I was expecting an "expert" claiming that the stones were transported from the Moon and cut with a plasma cutter into the shape, but luckily it was not one of those videos! Thanks for this! This video really shows how crudely the pyramid cores and 95%+ of the total volume was built.
It would be neat to see what these guys would have to say about Kailasa Temple in India. There's a lot of controversy about it; it would be neat to see a sober analysis at least attempted on Kailasa, just as a breakdown is performed here, again, by sober presentation.
In the Great Pyramid, you can see the 'outer shell' of blocks clearly. Near the end of the robber's tunnel you see the transition from fitted blocks to mortar & rubble, about 26m of fitted outer blocks at that level. The inner corridors are all lined with fitted blocks, too.
There's a great channel called History for Granite that examines the pyramids very closely. The Robber's tunnel has been patched up, he found great early pictures where you can see the large gaps before it was cleaned up and made tourist safe.
Thank you. It's been rough filtering through the ancient alien and ancient advanced civilization theories. I need valid theories with experimentation, and that's surprisingly hard to come by.
Makes sense in terms of building quickly and cost effectiveness. In the case of the Great Pyramid I would ask about structural integrity in relation to the chambers and shafts, seems to me that quite a lot of this masterpiece would have had to be made of carved blocks laid fairly precisely, not rubble and inferior workmanship. There are also many, many questions to be asked about how other temples, monuments, statues, obelisks, underground chambers and tunnelling were accomplished. Not by rubbing 2 bits of limestone together. Anyone who thinks this solves any mystery of Ancient Egypt needs a reality check.
The style of building with rubble inside and facing stones outside such as at the Cathedral explains the inner chambers, rubble piled up is very stable, like a dry stone wall if done with a little care it is exceptionally stable, same as clearly visible on outside of the pyramids, the smooth outside stones rest on the backing stones, like in a cathedral hallway the smooth stone is supported either side by rubble. All that's needed is the backing rubble has a few points of contact to be stable with the surface stones. is there a single feature you consider to be impossible?I have been at this for a while and have tracked back the claims of precision and symmetry to their source. The claims of precision etc are grossly exaggerated, perhaps you could provide an example to give me a reality check. It really only takes one solid example, I have yet to see one. Many vague lists i get but no one ever seems to be able to point at something and show it can't be done. Is there a single solid reality check. If you've seen his channel and watched the full videos on Mike Haduck I linked in the description you'd know it's a lot more than rubbing two stones together. That's merely a single example of getting a surface flat such as casing stones. If you'd like I can link videos I made showing to get granite a flat and polished with primitive tools. Easy to repeat although it was old news centuries ago.
@@SacredGeometryDecoded I will give you one, the Serapeum near the Djoser pyramid at Saqqara. I get that you are only saying construction and are not offering opinion on the movement and placing of artefacts, eg the Sarcophagi. I would love to hear how you propose these granite boxes were carved and finished to such a quality. If you are aware of the work of Christopher Dunn in terms of accuracy. How many years would you think it would take? Mind you that this is just one job.
A specific example that you asked for and yet no response. Referring to some video of you "polishing" a cut piece of granite does not answer the question of parallel walls, precision cornering and walls that are within microns of being perfectly flat. Can you get that finish?
@@ronaldhill1233 th-cam.com/video/bEwxMFDRmek/w-d-xo.html links on the description The Saqqara Serapeum coffers have ZERO precision to them, those who are still selling this precision claim after many books and tour deals are frauds. There is NO LEGITIMATE way to interpret the Saqqara Serapeum as any sort of example of precision. Even by my noobish standards they are poorly made and finished. You don't need fancy equipment, the ripples and pitting give it away froma distance just in the reflections. Grinding and polishing to flat. th-cam.com/video/a-EHHnBYaIg/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/ol2P7nEz-ac/w-d-xo.html Yes i can beat the flatness, anyone can, the Whitworth 3 plate technique for making granite surface plates is based on the old school polishing methods. It shouldn't have to be proved by me since there are entire industries where hand polishing precise instruments such as lens and mirror to flatness measured in nanometre. All based off of ancient mirror and other craftsman techniques. Highly polished walls- floors or granite are strewn across the pre modern machining world. It's cringe that those selling the " impossible" flatness either don't know the basics, or more likely given their tendency to suppress contrary info, they do know very well and are faking. I am very aware of Chris Dunn thank you. I other videos in this long series I can conclusively prove he is a fraud, not in error, but a deliberate falshood spreader. th-cam.com/video/H-d8FZjS42Y/w-d-xo.html In short the single experiment in the entirety of Lost High Ancient tech and grante cores was done by CHris Dunn, the guy faked it and did it with a machine. I will repeat he faked the experiment, impossible to get only a 1mm taper with a top heavy hand powered drill. In the link above I show his pictures from the Serapeum, his own squares do not fit, it's visible, indisputable, just like all the others who took a square and found the precision very IMPRECISE. SOme people I may disagree on interpretation, but the facts are the pyramids are built with rubble infill and mortar, and the Saqqara Serapeum boxes are NOT PRECISE or special in any way except size. WHile the niches inthe tunnels give a 1001 anchor points to move or spin the coffers into place. Sand to lower them deeper ones down. There's no evidence at all of precision, nothing questionable on how to make them with primitive tech. Trihedral inner corner th-cam.com/video/HQ2bHE7mTi4/w-d-xo.html Although even the corner is basic, you see them everywhere amongst masonry. Cutting corners like that is an early part of learning the mason trade.
@@SacredGeometryDecoded So how does saying they used mortar and rubble to build answer the simple question on how ancient egyptians moved the rocks of which some weighed many tons? Just one quick example, like the massive obelisks? Because we are talking about people who did not have the massive cranes we use today to build. The architects, precise measuring metals and modern day technology/equipment. these people barely had anything. I don't think they made a wooden crane and used a rope to hoist granite or limestone that weighed tons, that would snap easily.
This is wild I just tuned into your content and I already follow Mike Haddock. I’m also a mason from PA. I keep thinking about the distance from Aswan so many sites in Egypt are that feature that rose granite....dressing stones is one thing...transporting, staging, lifting and setting stones is another
Cheers. I have a few vids on ancient lifting tech but will update soon. The best way though is never to actually lift them. Always keep a part on the ground. Check out Wally Wallington if you haven't seen his videos on moving and erecting monoliths. There's also these ways th-cam.com/video/BgekJnMeNiY/w-d-xo.html the second method- using sand (just like Wally) is also mentioned in an Egyptian text in regards to raising giant statues. I need to dig up that source though.
They filled it all with junk. I’ve built stuff, I cant build this kind of things with present day tools with this precision, why go that length to be precise in the first place? Who cares if one end of a50 foot house is 3 inches offset to the right or left. Cant tell it with your eyes and nobody is crazy enough to measure them to make sure they are straight.
Actual stone masons have no problems with this.. not those idiots like Christopher Dunn and co. which obv havent even worked stone. I remember seeing this one years ago .. and i still chuckle. So, basicly... What impresses us today, and really should, is the amazing amount of workhours they put into their monuments. Thats the real achievement.
For some reason I see this on my phone but doesn’t show in comments on my PC? Sometimes edited comments go to ‘held for review’ but not there either. How goes the megalith dog?
@@SacredGeometryDecoded Hm, maybe some kind of shadowban as ive commented on many ancient high tech vids lately .. they dont seem to like that and report me or something. Doggo is doing pretty ok.
That's the way we do it today😂 Who has built a stone structure half the size of the giza pyramid??? He explained nothing How was the granite cut and lifted inside the kings chamber and others 50 ton blocks
th-cam.com/video/wHps6ongTGs/w-d-xo.html a playlist of Mike Haduck visiting ancient sites up to cathedrals and castles explaining the masonry techniques, the full videos often include demonstrations of stone properties and techniques
Excellent ! I am still a part of the smartest subspecies known to man, safe in the knowledge that men only snore to frighten snakes from the trees we used to sleep in. I suspected aliens had a sense of humour.
All this research on how the pyramids were build and all these experts couldn't just ask a real mason on they're opinion and they're common sense to solve the problem on how the Egyptians built the pyramids? Excellent guys you make so much sense. 👏👏👏🙂🇵🇷🇺🇸
th-cam.com/video/xv70B0T3cUM/w-d-xo.html - flint tools work virtually as good as steel to shape granite th-cam.com/video/a-EHHnBYaIg/w-d-xo.html - this one i wanted to grind to " precision" flat but the same principle for more rapid grinding but you'd use large grit instead of finer stuff Somewhere I have an experiment with pounding stones, they work really well for smoothing as well I'd prefer steel tools or better yet power tools but the old stuff works, steel isn't that much better. in some ways though the flint tools better, cheap and they are self sharpening, i tried a bit myself and its very surprising, a sharp thin edge stays even with heavy mallet strokes, very it does break off little slivers fall away leaving a fresh sharp edge
Sorry but : - if it is filled with "junk", how come all stone floors are parallel ? - how did they quarried/smoothed/place multi tonnes granite blocs in the center - why is there knobs on the outside and inside of the pyramide? - what is the proof that these pyramids were tombs again?
-if it was, they plainly were. - I have posted sample demos of splitting, working , smoothing granite with simple tools. Sail rigging is basis of ancient and modern lifting tech. The images of their boats and surviving rope shows they skilled with knots. Simple knots like truckers hitch turns single piece of rope into a crane. No knowledge of mechanical advantage means you can’t sail into the wind. Plus they used shaduf so had understanding of lever and counterweight.. -why knobs? They make a great lever point for one thing - whether tombs or not is irrelevant .
Vadim left this in a later comment Whoever quarried 400-1300 tonne blocks and cut them into perfectly symmetrical single piece statues(Luxor), is orders of magnitude superior in stone work and power to ANY cathedral worldwide. Whoever quarried 120 tonne pieces of granite and carved out internal dimensions parallel to each other on 7 feet with a 1/1000th of an inch margin of error, and replicated this over and over, has mastered physics and manufacturing process, period(precision granite boxes in the serapeum). Whoever worked stone like styrofoam in Egypt and arranged it in the millions of tons, can build rooms, believe me, idiotic to think otherwise. What defines Egypt is not rubble and mortar but megalithic polygonal build technique, massive structures that were never replicated again anywhere(pyramids), precision statues and boxes in the Saqqara, tunnels shooting straight into bedrock for 100s of feet with 80 tonne boxes in rooms they lead to, super engineered artifacts with an unknown to us purpose, like the schist disk, cardinal alignment of GP that we epically failed trying to attempt with a building a 1000 times smaller, in modern day, and much much more. This video is for the average dummy, for the naked eye so to speak. I know better, and have taken closer look. I hope you enjoyed your trip to Egypt though. You should do Cusco next, we need your expertise there. As that work is right there, in your face, humbling anyone who's ever held a chisel and mixed some mortar. " It's a shame that people like him have to make things like up the precision in the stone, when just by running a light over them shadows and reflections give away the imperfections. They don't really want any answers, they always bring up the polygonal thing, with a pantograph they make perfect replicas of elaborate sculpture, or better still fit shattered original stone to new pieces in restorations. Fitting the smooth curves of polygonal walls is no mystery compared to pure chaos of refitting shattered stone in 3D. But there's no mystery in seeing things done.
Look up “ analysing the Egyptian pyramids in the digital age” around 30min mark onwards. They show the internal structure a bit further. Stronger walls inside , but not tight fitting stones, then the spaces filled with rubble. Then in case of Great Pyramid, built on natural hill, no one knows for sure but the bedrock underneath might go up to support the chambers? That’s pure speculation though. I have a video somewhere on the bedrock plugs under the two biggest Giza Pyramids. Though the rubble and mortar itself is quite strong. The weight goes directly down so little care would have to be given to lateral forces.
@@SacredGeometryDecoded that was amazing! Not sure if that answered the question but I think that’s maybe because they were the first to do that work.. hopefully more will be done!
And the red granite in the interior of the great pyramid? The finishing on it is exquisite having seen it personally, higher quality then the casing blocks.
I have filmed and posted a few videos on working with granite and primitive technology. Experiments such as bringing rough split face granite to " precision" flat surface. During that I was getting all the close ups of granite artefacts and temples to compare results. The sarcophagus in Great Pyramis has cut marks , trace of a drill core and a surface that is on the low end of being honed. I did much better in my first two attempts. The walls are the same, the surface is still covered in puts and low spots. Even by hand working standards the standards of finishing are pretty average and inconsistent across each surface. Even as a total noob at grinding and polishing I don't see exquiistie work but rushed work. It takes max of 4 hours to bring split face block to a middle level reflective polish. Even by the low standards the granite in the Great Pyramid is not high quality work.
Exactly how do you cut rose granite with hand tools? The stonemasons are speaking as if Egyptians had access to the same exact tools that they use. Modern stonemasons use electrical saws and diamond tipped drills. There are no depictions of Egyptians using any type of electrical saws or diamond tip drills when constructing the pyramids. In fact, there are no depictions of Egyptians building the pyramids. Yet I can find depictions of slaves washing the genitals of their masters.
layman terminology used throughout. Very well narrated and documented . Max kudos guys . Our intelligence is being insulted . Thanks for opening eyes and minds and introducing time served knowledge . Make a hollow pyramid ! Indeed for we can all pile rubble up .l
I'm a bit confused at what you're getting at here. are the implications that they just used normal technology to build pyramids and that's it? or, is there some hidden subtext I missed
@@wodenravens yes, I know -- that's what I'm saying. that's why I asked him if he is trying to say something more, because in his other videos he shows how they deliberately made mistakes on the side lengths. it sounds to me like he's saying they deliberately flubbed the side lengths to encode very incredible mathematical things and created an extremely accurate model of the earth in it with just rubble and mortar. and this proves that they didn't have high technology? I'm having difficulty getting why he's trying to prove they used normal technology but then also that they purposefully flubbed the side lengths... there has to be another message he's trying to convey -- which is why I asked the question :)
@@kennybentley1161 I don't quite understand your point. Yes, the pyramids builders were not faultless. Yes, they were outstanding builders. Even the greatest dish in the world could have faults yet not need be 'jello'.
Tech vs knowledge. Todo the math or even take geodetic measures can be done with simple tools, such as measuring shadows in the way Eratosthenes measured the earth. Pi and phi and such with compass and straight edge. Only basic tech required, good logic and reasoning. Still a firm believer pre Greek people were good at geometry and taking observations. In fact I think it’s more impressive when done with “primitive” tools to 99.5% accuracy compared to 99.999999% accuracy and later developments in tech. The differences in size of base of Great Pyramid is 19.6cm between longest and shortest side. With a rope or measuring stick even a noob could do better than that. And surely someone would have double checked the all important lay out of the buildings foot print. They even had a special ceremony for laying out orientation and foundations of a new build. Stretching The Cord ceremony Basic tech just well applied is all that’s necessary. Still now craftsmen won’t polish the underside of a fancy grand piano the way they do the top and sides. The ugly rubble inside was never meant to be seen.
So how did they manage to shape those massive granite blocks in the Valley temple? No mortar either there. Also, when they speak about the pyramids it sounds as if they were talking about a cottage. How in h_ll did they solve the logistics and internal areas? How did they manage to keep the pyramids so straight, etc?? One more thing - nobody has been talking about "no mortar" in the filling stones of the pyramids, but rather the casing stones, and elsewhere, like in Peru.
How did they manage to shape the granite blocks? th-cam.com/video/xv70B0T3cUM/w-d-xo.html Shaping granite is no issue with the tools they had, if detailed carving can be done then shaping blocks is trivial. Not including other techniques such as fire setting to speed up the work of pounding stones. Logistics? In the records of early Egypt such as on the Palermo stone it shows they were a sophisticated civilisation. Apart from a regular census they even had special ones such as a census of the Goldsmiths. Schools of Life- scribe schools, Seshat the Goddess of accounting. Logistics of arming and supplying armies for foreign campaigns. Internal areas wouldn't have been internal during construction, I linked the full videos of Mike Haduck in description box, he goes inside and shows the places where bracing was placed, to keep the walls in place until the stone around it was laid and locked everything down. There are still cedar bracing beams to be found inside the Bent Pyramid and others too such as Meidum. Inside the pyramid there are many deviations and faults such as in the shafts, Upper chamber. I have been following this for a while and the big names in Lost Ancient HIgh Technology - Ancient Aliens speak of each block being precisely cut and laid and there being no mortar. If no one was talking about "no mortar" then why are so many people surprised to learn about the mortar? The few times I hear the mortar mentioned is to declare it is " only exterior repair work" because of the carbon dating.
No idea, though crowns of lower and upper Egypt used a snake. Wadjet of lower Egypt way back to earliest dynasties. All that type of history not really in my wheel house. I rely mostly on Dr Google for that kind of thing.
@@SacredGeometryDecoded l was expecting the opinion of stonemasons .Possibly barking up the wrong tree but as a lazy brain I try to rely on experience if a close up and personal type is involved. IMPRESSED you polished granite.
@@davepowell7168 th-cam.com/video/ol2P7nEz-ac/w-d-xo.html playlist of granite experiments, from making the abrasives through to drilling, cutting , polishing the primitive way
There are demos of people using those tools and they work. Flint tools on granite are self sharpening as they flake. To fit shattered stones together in restoration work they still use ancient masons device - pantograph. There’s nothing lol about tools that work. You should look into them and see what can be done. It’s a persistent myth this copper tool thing. The people selling the impossible with copper and stone tools carefully censor the demonstrations. I have filmed and posted several demos that anyone can repeat. Those who make a living pointing at stones can’t even be bothered trying but talk as if they know what they are saying. That is an LOL but really it’s more sad than anything. They still carry on about flatness and precision.
Building is building and has nothing to do with culture. Look at how the thing is put together. Nobody knows? Without a time machine it’s impossible to know exact process. How about you don’t speak at all. This guy is a mason with experience and actually shows the place rather than wave his hands in the air hiding behind “it’s all a mystery nobody knows.” The pyramids are piled blocks with mortar in the gaps. Corbeled grand gallery and more blocks piled. The bottom half contains 85% of the volume. A vaulted ceiling or something like the pantheon of blue mosque is a more complex build. I guess that’s a mystery no one can answer and you must be if that culture to look at it. Stfu
@Bringmea Bananaleaf as l said l am open to all conclusions, and sorry to dissapoint you on this but have to work too from time to time, have not read or seen yet the link you did send me. As soon as l have l will get back to you...
The Unfinished obelisk and the large stones in Baalbek are all still attached tot he Earth, and far from precise in their condition. The Ramses Ozymandias statue was that heavy but the " precision" is claimed rather than shown. The large statues at Karnak and Luxor are claimed to be precise but that is based on photography that had a grid placed over it in photoshop. They haven't been measured as precise. Though in recent years a giant statue was built in India for the Jains, using a plumb line and ruler to plot out the small model to the giant statue they maintained one inch over the whole thing.
@@SacredGeometryDecoded that is bs, have a look at the work of Christopher Dunn, even Flinders Petrie in the 1880's was aware of the precision, but could not prove it.
I see these a lot it's all so simple then from deep inside the pyramid there's an 80-ton Granite block been there shafts pointing at Orion carved through the rebel?
You can see old photos of masons moving and lifting heavy blocks into much more precarious positions with ancient tools. There is an argument s as bout those shafts alignments but the shafts themselves kink and are not “precise” or exceptionally well made. I hear that “heavy block” and “alignment/precision” thing all the time as well. These “it’s too hard” or it “can’t be done” people.
@@SacredGeometryDecoded although I do agree with you that ancient people have more knowledge than we give them credit for I think there was a society much more advanced than we are in almost every way who moved these blocks you may have seen them move some blocks but not blocks of a hundred or a thousand tons you need to look into how hard it is to build something to exact specifications although not impossible it is very difficult go get a granite rock and start banging on it with a copper chisel and you'll see what I mean there are so many mathematical equations in the pyramid it's a little hard to believe that it's all coincidental bottom line is we have no idea how this was done
Ohh, and added ancient organic material to it as well I suppose. Builders often make gypsum mortar and add tonnes of burnt 4500 year old timber to it. And yes, yes you absolutely are.
That's all it is, marketing scamming & priming. Like nasa, all primed by gobbles & employed von Braun Have you read his book about going to Mars? The group who goes to Mars was called ... *ELON* There are also the other things Werner blew the whistle on prior to his death Terrorists Asteroids (may have been replaced with "viruses -ala covid) Alien invasion All theater for the masses.
So the used mortar on the pillars but they not supposed to know about it to use it on the pyramids? WTF? How you think the kings were able to change the names that were carved when they became the ruler?
Points for shoring ups points and lifting bosses. They were used widely in recorded ancient history, In Egypt the broken off nubs were found amongst the debris. Sarcophagi still have them attached and some have them broken off but not completely polished out such as the Serapeum at saqqara.
🤣🤦 You know what I love about this idiotic claim = the sheer facile logic it represents......... To create blocks from a mixture and a mold - to say nothing of tens of thousands if not millions of them = is exponentially *MORE* labor intensive and resource intensive than simple quarrying of blocks. Ironic how the "geopolymer" idiots never seem to figure this out. 🤷 So here is your freebie: 1 - first of course you need your mixture = literally tons and tons of it. 2 - this means since you lack a local construction/hardware box store to simply purchase what you require = you must make it yourself..... 3 - this means you must: a - mine in vast quantities the requisite minerals etc. and convert those into usable form. b - all that must be transported to where it would be required. c - you must then create your mix - which means vast containers and mixing implements are required. d - all of that must then be poured into your molds...... - oh - did we forget about the molds. 4 - so you will additionally require wooden molds = quite a lot of them actually. You see no matter how careful you will invariably damage molds in the process of using them which will increase your requirements as far as numbers needed and importing a lot of wood to create them. 5 - finally your blocks upon curing - which means a lot of time wasted until then - must be removed from your molds and placed = hopefully without damaging them..... Meanwhile to quarry blocks you need manpower - which the corvee supplied. You need quarrying tools of which you have an endless supply of gneiss stone tools as well as bronze which can be recycled and recast when required. You have individuals skilled in creating and maintaining these tools + skilled in quarrying techniques. Finally you need food etc. to support your workforce = which again they already had. So which constitutes the larger effort then.......... 🤨
Romans built more accurately and with more material than the Pyramids but they put it all to the good use of making aqueducts. Massive infrastructure projects rather than vanity projects.
Your not the first with this information. In the 60's I used to be impressed by the Erich Von Däniken books, until I read a refutement work in the early 70's which was called, Some Believe In Chariots, I think. It was written by a group of Australian professors who took apart his theories in a way which was far more believable than Von Däniken's imagination. Since then I have ignored all ancient technology theorists.
Nobody said he was the first, he never said he was the first. He's just trying to explain the truth and pull some people's head out of their asses. He's literally exposing indoctrination and their attempt to keep us from progressing civilization
@J Beezy Von Daniken flat lied. He cropped photos to make Mesoamerican art look like elephants and rocket ships. His Nazca Lines as parking for starships omits that the lines are so close higher they wouldn't do for a car park. It goes on and on. Try the book *Crash Go the Chariots* for another debunk. If you must have video, NGS had a special on why it was obvious fabrication.
An example [for me] of someone who apparently knows a great deal about a subject of which I am quite ignorant, but their explanatory power is lacking. They presume [for me] that I, the listener, have some basic understanding of their specialty which I do not have. Good masons poor teachers. Also, please speak into the camera and not away from it. {Maybe I'm just stoopid}.
I saw a TV documentary on the Pyramids which was done by an engineer and he came up with his version of how they were built which pretty much ties up with your theory. He reckons each level was an outer layer of the nice casing stone and the internal bit was just back filled and repeated at each layer. Interestingly he pointed out that the amount of blocks that were supposedly used didn't match the the volume that had been left in the quarry they had used. Something else that no one takes into consideration is the fact that if 20million blocks were used and it was constructed in 22 years, that means the each block would have to have been quarried, transported, shaped and put in place every 5 minutes which is just not possible. It would be good if you guys did a piece on the granite boxes that have been found and have been hand carved to a ridiculous precision.
@@szpakmateusz8500 That's just the inner blocks by the way, it doesn't take into account the casing blocks, the construction of the internal chambers, the levelling of the bedrock....shall I go on? just not humanly possible in 22 years I'm afraid.
@@andyd2033 efficiency / time - your argument in theory it is possible ... you said so .... 1 block / 5 minutes or 288 blocks per day .. 2,500,000 blocks in 20 years
@@szpakmateusz8500 so it’s possible to quarry, transport, shape and then manoeuvre in place a block every 5 mins....are you crazy. You left out the quarry, transporting and shaping of the casing stones, the shaping of the bedrock, the blocks used around the bedrock. You seriously need to sit down and do the math. The historians have got it seriously wrong on how long it took to build one of these things.
Your take on the working of the stone is great, but make no mention of the overall mathematical precision and incorporation of pi, phi, etc, nor the astrological calculations and alignments. That stuff is a whole other kettle of fish, I guess.
I have hundreds of videos on the math and other features f the Pyramids, as well as the same thing has been used through time in public buildings and city plans right up until today. By a select group of architects. Here are a couple of Pyramid playlists aout the math, measures, astronomy etc. th-cam.com/video/2I0eDDz4yfI/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/play/PL47iaGB6hlT4MnmRZmIMqvBRqQQIam13N.html
very poor assessment, they talk about those 1000 ton rocks as if moving them was not a big deal, no word on precission, no tlk about perfect measures and alignments.
@Bringmea Bananaleaf they carve big part of bedrock but others are very heavy granite cut and place with high precession, you claim not to be ignorant do your research, don’t just believe garbage like this old men in the video
@Bringmea Bananaleaf there no fairy tales, people bypass the fact that we cannot even understand how they build the pyramids, they losely say how they did, but in practicality it is impossible to engineers currently to replicate it, you have to keep an open mind man, don’t be so fanatical about the things you learn, take a look at some ideas here th-cam.com/video/KFuf-gBuuno/w-d-xo.html don’t reject it without even consider other possibilities
I have drilled several different types of granite with different abrasives. Posted how to videos do anyone can replicate it. The problem is you’re getting your info from terrible sources. If these lost high tech guys can’t work out how to create flat surfaces or drill granite then their opinions on more complex details will surely be lacking. I have filmed and posted how to videos directly contradicting the false facts promoted by lost high technology.
That's kind of odd to say the least? th-cam.com/video/A4RAzgvOTgw/w-d-xo.html A playlist of experiments in granoite including many videos on every aspect of the core drilling. I have filmed how to drill stone cores in granite using the tools the Egyptians themselves show themselves using. It's cheap quick and easy to do, there is no mystery in core drilling, replicating every feature described as " impossible" by those who promote the " enigma of the stone cores". The striations, the tapering, the polishing...everything said to be impossible or mysterious are features you can't avoid making if you use primitive techniques. If you want to win some bets you can repeat what I have done here. Scientists Against Myths is another great channel to follow. They bust a lot of these myths with repeatable demonstrations as well. To be blunt the core drilling thing is a big scam, most of the the channels pushing it censor the information that contradicts their claims. The rest are just repeating what they hear from the bigger channel.s If they just spent a few dollars and a few hours doing a real experiment that whole thing would be settled.
Not add at all if you think about it. Ask yourself a simple question. Would a Pharaoh want a temple or whatever built from blocks with holes drilled into them for no apparent reason??? Answer: no = unless recycled stone was being used. Giza was first constructed in the Old Kingdom. Later during the New Kingdom it saw restoration as Thutmose IV's Dream Stele tells us. Again during the Late Period prior to the Persian invasion it again saw additions to it. Finally in between the various dynasties Egypt was fragmentary representing various zones of control under Viziers. Also Pharaohs sometimes cannibalized Old and Middle Kingdom sites for raw materials to build other things. Thus do not assume just because what you reference was found at Giza that is has to date to the time of Giza's creation. As alluded to Giza itself was added to - and cannibalized for stone to build other things - throughout its existence. Thus for all you know those cores might have been done later using iron tools rather than bronze. They may represent "cast off" stone or stone from other things repurposed to build something. Final thought. In the surrounding cemeteries at Giza the tombs of the workmen supervisors have stone facades - likely cast off stone as noted from other construction there which they used to create their own tombs. To consider a technology used you must place the object in the correct time frame.
What makes it a regression is we've lost contact with the majestic, harmonic roots. In a strictly material sense, perhaps the current product can be considered 'progression'. However, with a deeper understanding of the many levels of knowledge built into one single structure, today's is comparatively ant poop on an ant shoe.
@Ninth Heretic What is in Chartres is the same as in the pyramids. I'm not sure what you mean by 'profane' buildings being encoded. Perhaps you could explain a little more.
@Ninth Heretic Do you think modern architects have "keys" to ancient knowledge ?? or that the "Masonic" interpretation of symbols is unique and faultless ?? Do you prefer baroque, gothic or classical order?
@Ninth Heretic Your religious experiences and conclusions are your private "matter" .. I only prefer to talk about "crafts";) ancient temples were mainly available only to "priests", and today for tourists;). your last interesting vid;) Romanesque style chapel, although rebuilt;) I also recommend Maastricht
Hagia Sophia and the Quadrivium th-cam.com/video/q3rOdkfQgAc/w-d-xo.html My earliest videos were on Australia, especially a few people like Gov Macquarie who set out a pattern of town design and street widths etc. All very hermetic. Also architects like Barnet and Blackett. They embedded this in the designs of major public buildings. The sameg in other Australian capitals, Canberra is a textbook on it, in city plan and the buildings. But it is in Perth also, original and modern, St George Terrace is 1.5 miles or 7920 feet or 5280 cubits long. Also the old cathedral there by James Barnet, you;ll find all the measures and proportions there. Later the old Bond Tower Building and that circle monument thingy on the river bank. All by the numbers, where the ancient measure units converge on the harmonics.
@@SacredGeometryDecoded I didn't know that about st george's terrace, but yes, I'm aware of the harmonic's being built into buildings by particular architects. Usually, but not exclusively, linked to governance of some kind. The blue and red mosques are beautiful, yet another place I've had the privilege to visit, Istanbul. What I thought you were referring to in the vid was architecture in general, not the buildings encoding the ancient metaphysics. Thanks for the reply, and I will check out that link.
That’s not “mortar” that’s bits and pieces of rock and sand that they dumped into areas that were weathered or destroyed over time. Haha go inside the pyramid and show me the mortar they used. There’s literally nothing but solid granite in the grand gallery, kings chamber, queens chamber. All solid rose quarts or granite.
The grand gallery and queens chamber are limestone. The kings chamber is granite. It is mortar. It is beneath stone as well. It’s a gypsum mortar and has been analysed for chemical composition. Haha
@@SacredGeometryDecoded ha funny no it’s not. I’ve actually been inside lmao the kings chamber contains solid granite blocks in excess of 100 tons at an elevation of 300ft +. Idk what you’re smoking. It’s a fact that the great pyramid contains granite and rose quartz. Besides you can’t cut granite with copper either. Also no mortar used in any of the ancient structures in Peru. Also no you can’t fit a razor blade in between the near perfect blocks of granite. You’re talking about the outside of the pyramid in your video. Not the inside. It’s well known that the outside was filled will rubble before the casing stones were placed because it was easier. You also contradict yourself. You claim that they quarried these stones 400km away brought them to the Giza plateau only to cut them into smaller blocks when they got there? Makes absolutely no sense. Why wouldn’t they cut them into smaller blocks to make transportation easier? You “archaeologists” not that you are one don’t know a damn thing about engineering. You fools try and claim these structures were built with copper tools and pounding stones. I’d like to see you cut a block of granite or rose quarts with copper tools, you’ll probably die before you finish which is why it’s never been replicated to this date. Even the ancient Egyptians claim their civilization was one of inheritance during the time when the “gods walked amongst men”. The great pyramid is far older than previously believed. Over 2 million individual blocks including limestone, granite, and rose quartz. Allegedly completed in 25 years hahaha what a JOKE. They want us to believe that every man woman and child of the entire kingdom were working night and day for 25 years straight, averaging a stone block cut, moved and lifted within 2mins for each. Bring any stone Mason or engineer and have them explain it to you because obviously you were too ignorant to do so on your own. You guys hinge your belief on the fact that the only tools you found were copper ones, yet we know for fact that certain sophisticated items have been found like the Antikitherya mechanism, which had techniques and mechanisms we don’t fully understand today and we only found 1 example. Just because it hadn’t been found yet dosent make it a prerequisite to not exist. Everyone’s starting to wake up to this bullshit dogmatic origin of civilization you guys cling to. Humans have been around for 800k years yet you think we only started building stuff 6,000 years ago lmao and you were PROVEN wrong when Gobekli Tepi was discovered, completely up ending you’re entire argument. That’s why you fools had to change the definition of “Hunter Gatherers” instead of admitted y’all were wrong. It’s only a matter of time until you idiots are brushed aside. Also take s look at the companies researching the great pyramid, they’re all Astro physics, material science, etc investigating it. They actually understand the enigma that is the Giza pyramid. Even the CIA acknowledges it in their Adam and Eve story they declassified recently. Do your research. COPPER CANT CUT GRANITE
@@fullsendcirca9255 I have cut and drilled granite and basalt with copper and posted the videos for anyone to repeat the experiment. It’s cheap and easy to test. The rest is a word salad since I already said the kings chamber is granite. You said the grand gallery and queens chamber were granite. Your opinion on stones and mortar are as far from reality as your ideas on cutting granite. Modern gang saws using iron blades don’t cut granite with the blades either. The abrasive does the cutting. Just like the paper don’t do squat in sand paper accept to push the abrasive across the material you are working. Your ignorance is only over matched by your confidence. Btw the blocks in the chambers above kings chamber weren’t out there before the stones beneath it. The thing of their height is an idiotic point. Steel beams in a sky scrapers top floor are 1000 feet from the ground. The grand gallery angle of 26 degrees also found in ramps from ancient quarries. At that height the pyramid would still be the size of a football field. You are out of your league here buddy. I’ve heard it all and done many of the things your cult insists are impossible. Not that I should have needed to, the principles were well understood millennia ago. Nice try champ but you’ve brought a wet sponge to a gun fight. Can’t cut granite with copper. That’s the war cry of the lost high tech fantasist. 😂 What next? Something about Mohs scale I bet. Just a heads up window glass has the same mohs hardness rating as mild steel. I’ve heard it all sonny. Just with these comments I know you are just a parrot of lost high tech talking points. That you say then with such pride and confidence also tells me you are a goose. You’ve latched on to this cult hook, line and sinker.
It's a bit too "far" what you are talking about;) Baalbek, Angkor Wat, Greek, Roman temples and palaces, Inca walls etc ?? mortar and rubble? maybe only the "Chinese Wall" and contemporary reconstructions The cathedrals from the 19th century are not the same as from the Middle Ages Pyramids - not rubble - but a structure made of leveled platforms otherwise they would collapse .. cement mortars? ..lime mortars are a completely different story .. There is no need to compare reinforced concrete structures to the ancient ones .. no progress, only short-term copies ..
Grand cathedrals such as Chartres go back a little further than nineteenth century. No megalith structure has a decent living space But the pyramids are made of rubble and mortar. That’s just a fact Though Inca walls have similar construction. Nice looking for on outside. Look from behind and not so nice. Smaller ones like Cusco are decent enough but smaller than Bomarsund fortress and other later Cyclopean walls. Mike haduck has a cool video on Virgin Islands masonry. Two masons in the 70’s built some cool irregular stone walls.
Gypsum mortars not too different from modern mortar. Hardens over time. And mortars need to be less strong than the brick / stone The Mike haduck video on bent pyramid is worth a look. But either way the reality remains the pyramids are majority roughly hewn blocks and gypsum lime mortar, It was the standard building practice and seen in other sites The mortarless construction, precision cut thing is a myth
@@SacredGeometryDecoded "The mortarless construction, precision cut thing is a myth" - I don't think so, rather precise cuts and clamps .. especially for large blocks. I believe you are completely confusing the masonry techniques
@@szpakmateusz8500 the footage shown here is pretty conclusive in regards to the pyramids. At Luxor you can see stone clamps/ties still in place, not 15 feet from where a clamp is missing, guess which one gets shown all the time as a mystery? The guides there make a point of showing the surviving stone . Though if they used metal ties ..., they had metallurgy. I haven’t seen anything that can’t be explained within archaeological evidence, replicated with experiments or still not being practiced by traditional masons. Only the direct evidence of Egyptians using cranes. But they made shadufs and rugged ships for sail. Lever, counterweight and rigging. Literally all the pieces of ancient cranes.
@@SacredGeometryDecoded Where do you want to sail? by the Nile? or the sea ?? From Aswan to Giza? do you need sails and cranes ?? joints without mortar are not myths or mysteries - just a different non-standard technique, I have no doubt that mortar was used in the pyramids
All those Mike haduck videos full length show internals. Including the points for bracing the internals as they were filled around. But same as exterior racing stones but on smaller scale. Internals make a tiny fraction of overall. In older videos have shown them, such as kings chamber, close ups show not very well finished and gaps in between in places
These two guys really irritate me , there's just so much they're missing and failing to regard. Remembering the fact they are more than likely in the MASONS ! Hence the fact they picked out St John the divines cathedral ! And your comment at the end completely disagree with with . It's actually a very ignorant comment.
It’s actually a very ignorant comment. I respond in kind. It’s ignorant to compare stacked lintel style construction to high thin walls supporting a vaulted stone ceiling. Just by describing out the construction technique it is evident. That you had to mention St John Cathedral as a “Masonic” dog whistle. When you can find the same technique everywhere where masonry is practised shows you come at this from a political angle. Not a stone masonry angle. That you need to poison the well in this way says a lot. I don’t like a fact, it must be Masons, therefore....
On his channel he has demo’s with granite. I have a bunch myself cutting granite with copper. Though those casing stones don’t seem to have been cut. Granite especially splits and breaks very well. Shaping it with stone tools is little different than steel tools. I also have a series on Aswan quarry that goes into that.
th-cam.com/video/-_1GceufZuM/w-d-xo.html Here’s some info on cutting granite, the majority of what’s on TH-cam is very wrong, usually citing a nearly 30 year old clip that doesn’t include the larger context.
Granite in general was not used much in the Giza Pyramids if you look. In the Great Pyramid and Khafre's it is only found around the inner chambers/sarcophagi. Menkaure used it as facade for his - but his pyramid is a fraction of the size of the other 2. So immediately you must take into account that the amount seen is really not a large quantity. Further if you look at Menkaure's pyramid many of the granite blocks on the bottom are still rough. This lends to 2 possibilities. First is that the pyramid was not yet finished at the time of his death. So they might have still be smoothing out the granite casing stones and did not finish. That is not unusual as work typically stopped upon the death of the Pharaoh. The alternative is that the pyramid previously being damaged and looted saw renovation during the 26th Dynasty - which similarly was not finished. There is evidence of his tomb being looted early on and during the later "Late Period" just prior to the Persian conquest of Egypt - Giza saw some renovation. Menkaure got a new wooden coffin - the remains of which is in the British Museum - and a new granite sarcophagus which was lost at sea when the ship carrying it to England sank in a storm. So bronze saws and abrasives can cut granite. Also it can be pounded out using gneiss stone like dolerite and then sanded smooth using a flat block and abrasive. Final thought. As noted the amount involved here is a fraction of the total stone used. They would have known approximately how much was needed before the foundation of the pyramid was laid. Thus the quarry would have had literally years to quarry and transport the needed stone to Giza before placement on the pyramid. Quarries run in continuous operation and thus partially quarried stone is always on hand. See where the blocks are not uniform. It is easier to shape existing blocks to the fit than to purposely fabricate an entire block. So it appears they using whatever granite was quarried simply "adjusted" it to fit in a given space resulting in the lack of uniformity you see. If as the LAHT claim they had some supposedly "advanced" technology then common sense says we should see standardized blocks like you see today with bricks etc. of a uniform size/shape/consistency - which we don't. They were removing stone from available bedrock seams yielding various sized blocks and then shaping those to fit.
@@varyolla435 I said that the 'facing stones' were granite. The mostly missing facing stones that were taken away by construction looters over the past few thousand years. The one inscription found inside the great pyramid that claims that it was built for Kufu has been discredited. No proof that it was built at that time. I suspect the Sphinx is even older than any pyramid.
@@David35687 Sorry your reading issues complicate you ability to understand what is stated by others. One more time. The amount of granite blocks seen is small. If you wanted to argue against fabricating thousands or tens of thousands of granite blocks you may have an argument vis a vis logistics - but you're not. The amounts involved were doable while the tools at had were sufficient. As an aside. Upon what great trove of evidence do you declare the workman graffiti is fake??? Parroting dubious claims that "you" happen to believe does not make them real I'm afraid. Perhaps one day you'll understand this. The area of the relieving chambers was only accessible at the time of construction. The graffiti itself mirrors other seen in Egypt. The covering stones of the solar boat pits has similar red ocher paint graffiti on it - save for it references Dejedefre who followed his father Khufu as Pharaoh. At Saqqara there are similar workman markings on covering blocks of Sneferu's pyramids. In 2013 at Wadi al-Jarf where Merer's diary was discovered there were stone blocks dumped into an area near the caves. On some of those blocks = red ochre paint graffiti referencing work gangs - again related to Khufu. Facts as John Adams famously quipped are _"stubborn things."_
Is this guy for real the pyramids are over 4 000.000 years old and of cause there,s going to be some movement and cracks in the stone blocks though movement over time i just wonder if this mason built a grave stone would it last that long.
Are you for real? in 4million years the amount of erosion would cut down a mountain. Links to his full videos in description, in the Menkaure video at the end he goes to a graveyard and looks at what happens to limestone in a century. You might as well say the pyramids are 1000 billion trillion years old. You’re disproving your own point by bringing up erosion of gravestones. There is mortar linking those blocks, they obviously not like that because of movement, unless by magic the casing stones are exempted from the same forces. 🤦♂️
right limestone junk and mortar was used for the inner. how did they cut the granite facing stones? how did they corey them? how did they move them? also is no mortar between the facing stones, they fit perfect. you even show it in your video. you debunked nothing, or answered any questions.
How did they cut grantie facing stones? By asking that question it suggests you don't have an answer in which case I suggest you aren't in a position to judge if something has or hasn't been debunked. If you're not interested in traditional granite quarrying and working techniques and finding those answers, that are freely available, then you are not interested in this topic. From fine detailed carving all the way back to the quarrying process simple " primitive" tools work fine, and we find those tools littering the work sites.
@@SacredGeometryDecoded i know what is said, ball hammers and coper chisels. and it was built in 20 years. all BS. just because you find "primitive tools" littering the work site means nothing. thats like if someone dug up a train car 3k years from now and read the graffiti on the side and say "o this was made by a primitive cultures named the bloods and crips. there was an advanced civilization that was lost. they built the pyramids and they were not tombs. what happened to them IDK. but that is the question we all should be asking.
@@abhvgas if it’s BS on that time frame, and I never pushed that, or that it was a tomb either, then you’d know how long it takes? Then you’d be able to show it took so many years at least. Having gone out of my to actually do various experiments in primitive stone work, as well as looking for others, I am confident and going to be very direct and honest with you. You don’t know. You believe it to be true. But you don’t know.
@@SacredGeometryDecoded lol yes i dont know. i even say "IDK" ALL i know is what main stream academia say is not true. A) a primitive culture with stone hammers and coper chisels did not build them. B) they were not intended to be the resting place of some pharaoh. how long it takes is a dependent on the technology used in construction. when they were built, is just a guess. but if we know about the people and their building technology and tools we can eliminate the currant idea based on that alone. ill be blunt, if you think they quarried, hauled them (some up to 50 tons)500 miles and assembled with those tools, and with the amount of precision with stone hammers and copper your dreaming. to just to move one stone 10 tons 500 miles would be a feat almost imposable for the people that apparently built the pyramids. yet thats what we are told to believe. and you seam to believe it too.
@@abhvgas moving a 10 ton stone 500 miles, like floating it down the Nile from a quarry that is mostly flooded every year, to sites that are a short distance from the river. A half kilometre in flood from river in flood season. The distance thing should be expressed, half mile at most to river, then half mile from river. Moving a ten tonne stone that distance. Wally Wallington wouldn’t even get a sweat going with a 20t stone on his own. He doesn’t use a double hitch knot
OMG I actually watched the video. Its hilarious, or sad. Really cant decide, its pretty dam hilarious. The whole video is basically, its a pyramid, it like made of rock and stones. Some are smaller some are bigger. They are like pieced it together, there like stones like there's stones behind the stones. Its all like together into one big giant stone pyramid. See there's some mortar in that crack in the stone, no different then today because masons call it rubble construction. As you know, 5000 years ago they were using outdated rock placing techniques. They need to place the rock, on top of the rock, to make a rock house. Because its simple, in masonry its like rocks placed on top of other rocks. And look there's mortar between the cracks. Ah. I see now I was to harsh in calling these people names. But still. It had to be done least the consensus among the ignorant reign. Freaking hilarious video. Its hard to know if there for real, or just joking. These guys dont even know what the argument that is against modern archeology claim of the pyramids being built even is. I did not know t his entire video was a comedy. For a second I took it for a serious
For those interested solairable has been triggered and keeps leaving new comment threads. To put it in a nutshell he even invented a mountain range right up against the Nile. For some reason seeing reality spurns this crowd to invent bigger and better fictions to protect the fundamentalist religion. It’s pretty much useless sharing info or providing answers to questions. Facts have no place in their cult. Stone is magic and so only magicians can do any stone work. Isn’t always the way though. The loudest people are the incompetent ones screaming it can’t be done because everyone is as incompetent and tool shy as I am.
@@SacredGeometryDecoded Dude give it a rest. The world does not revolve around you and your pyramid theories. In fact does not revolve around me or any of us. You know what it revolves around? The sun. Ain't none of this important that's for sure. . Just dont take yourself so serious.
@@solairable then why do you keep starting new threads. This is my channel after all, where else would I be? Inventing mountain ranges and now inventing yourself as some sort of victim. First the other boys were mean to you😞 Now you’re being harassed because people respond to you. How dare they reply to your long factfree rambling comments, made as if you know a single thing about the topic you pretend to care about. You have to be the Mount Olympus of lacking in self awareness. You came here Einstein and made a bunch of comments. Even complaining about being replying to you, I have an ego yes. But much of that is built on the fact that at least I am not like you.
Lol 🤣🤣🤣 Sure mate, just put some rubble and use mortar and you're done! Take a look at some of UnchartedX documentaries and then come back and try to make a pyramid with all the correct geometrical precision, halls and corridors inside, instead of throwing random words out of your mouth...
Since he never shows any precision, but does say the word a lot, maybe you could come up with an example. Or maybe you’re just parroting BS because you’ve heard the lie so many times you’ve come to believe it without question. Though I am not sure the logic of referencing a guy who claims the pyramids were precisely cut and laid blocks. Is he really the person you want to reference? The video shows what the pyramids are made from. That it triggers you to see truth tells me a lot. That you’d point to uncharted x as some type of source puts that in bold underline.
I have hours on the math of the pyramids, I always use the J.H Cole survey. Closer to the time of the rubble around the base being removed, and it's in general agreement with later such as Dorner to within a few millimetres.
Lmao. These guys just cracked the pyramid case….. yeah right. The ignorance in these guys, it’s been known for many years now that it was done nicely on the outside and backfilled. Are you made it sound like this was a piece of cake. I would like to see you build one half the size. I mean you said it was easy lmaooooo. There’s so much more to these pyramids then just the rubble backfill. The engineering the pinpoint accuracy of where it’s located, The damn near perfect cuts, The moving of these materials, no one can even come up with The reason why they were built or what they even are, but I bet you can tell us. And then when they had the flat surface of rocks and then it changed to big humps you said all they did here was just put the stone in and then cut them down flat like these, I would like to see you cut just one of them down, and since you know how they did it, use the Method they did and then tell us. I can’t wait to hear how it was done, Lol The ignorance.
You might want to look at the other videos i Have posted before you call anyone ignorant. You clearly are not aware of the experiments that have been done, and examples of traditional masons still working to this day. When you do stumble out of your ignorance and look around outside of the lost high tech guys you'll be shocked by what the world has to offer. Wait until you stumble on the precision polygonal granite lighthouses and so many other examples to which you are plainly ignorant. Or when you stumble onto ancient lifting techniques and that they all emerge from ship rigging. Get out of the lost high tech bubble and look around, there's so much out there, it's easy to find. I did. Ignorance is curable but you have to look for answers rather than copy paste the same comments a million others post every day.
@@SacredGeometryDecoded This is no bubble and it’s no conspiracy theory, in the video they walk around like it was a piece of cake there’s more to it than that their whole argument basically was the rubble was thrown behind the outer casings In the outer casings would look good but it’s not even just about that scientist can’t even figure these things out
@@markpatrick9846 what scientists can’t figure what out? I hear vague shit like that all the time. I’d love to hear what these “scientists” can’t figure out. Please educate me on the SCiENCE. It’s going to be a tour guide talking about Chris Dunn I would bet? Or Yousef Awyan keeper of ancient wisdom?
Ah........the old "impossibility" rationalization. How quaint. 🙄 If there are supposedly "near perfect" cuts as you say = why not on all the blocks??? After all those nicely done ones are a drop in the bucket compared to the total number of blocks which are nowhere near as perfect as you claim. Also what supposed accuracy in location do you infer??? The siting of the Giza pyramids took place over several generations. Further Djedefre who followed his father Khufu on the throne did not build there. His own pyramid is further north of Giza. So if there was some "grand plan" apparently he did not get the word. lol! Meanwhile tombs were being built at Giza - hence cluttering the landscape - in the years between the 3 main pyramids being built. That means that when a royal pyramid was sited it had to accommodate existing quarries and cemeteries already in place - let alone available high ground which could accommodate a large structure. Finally why were they built = the Egyptian religion of course - duh! To exist in the afterlife you needed your body to survive + people to remember you and make offerings. Thus they mummified their bodies and built tombs to protect them. They built temples and cults around themselves to be remembered. Further those tombs "stood out" so as to broadcast your power and glory as well as to please your Gods who responded by making Egypt strong and the harvest bountiful. See = answers after all. All that was required is to actually learn as opposed to simply asking questions absent any real desire to understand. p.s. - there are evenly spaced post holes surrounding the foundations of Giza pyramids = literally hundreds of them. That shows how they meticulously surveyed their foundations using the Sun's shadow to ascertain the cardinal directions. See - no "advanced tech" needed. Merely time and patience - and a lot of posts and rope.
Everybody knows this, you act like this is a revelation. This is a no brainer, you can look right at it and see, duh! What people want to know is how they carved that huge lotus pillor with the perfect top . Or how they carved those statues of ramseses that are so perfect. Or how about the huge polished boxs at the serapeum? Tell how this stone mason could do that with bronze tools! This guys acts like he descovered the way the parimads were built. This is all old news.
If everyone already knows then why are so many people upset and surprised by these facts. Not everyone knows, not even a majority of know. If everyone already knows then why are Lost HIgh Tech channels like Brien Foerster, Bright Insight, Uncharted X , Khemit School getting away with saying the opposite of reality.Talking about millions of precisely cut and laid blocks? NO. Not everyone knows, Very few know. And the lost ancient high technology grifters are getting away with telling the exact opposite of reality. " What people want to know is how they carved huge giant lotus pillar with perfect ops" How do you know it's perfect? Because the lost high tech people told you it was!! The same people who say the Saqqara Serapeum coffers are " PRECISION" Just look at a corinthian capital and a lotus looks like childs play. Any skilled stone mason sculptor could do it , th-cam.com/video/xv70B0T3cUM/w-d-xo.html They could do it with flint tools. Question asked , question answered. You are allowed to look at ancient history and stone masonry outside of the lost high technology crowd. I know you haven't because you are repeating the exact same talking points of someone who hasn't looked outside of that echo chamber. You seriously think these exact same points haven't been brought up a 1000 times on my channel? A million times on other channels. I know exactly what you are going to say before you do, I know exactly what you've looked into, and what you haven't looked into. You are part of an echo chamber/cult. It's up to you if you want to break free of that but the fact is it is a cult. Once you recognise that you'll see. TYhese lost ancient high tech people are grifter frauds. Especially Chris Dunn, the father of lost high tech. It's an incestuous group of cowards who haven't the balls to accept any challenge, they cite each other and so circle jerk podcasts. It's an echo chamber. A giant snake oil ponzi scheme.
I was expecting an "expert" claiming that the stones were transported from the Moon and cut with a plasma cutter into the shape, but luckily it was not one of those videos! Thanks for this! This video really shows how crudely the pyramid cores and 95%+ of the total volume was built.
It would be neat to see what these guys would have to say about Kailasa Temple in India. There's a lot of controversy about it; it would be neat to see a sober analysis at least attempted on Kailasa, just as a breakdown is performed here, again, by sober presentation.
In the Great Pyramid, you can see the 'outer shell' of blocks clearly.
Near the end of the robber's tunnel you see the transition from fitted blocks to mortar & rubble, about 26m of fitted outer blocks at that level.
The inner corridors are all lined with fitted blocks, too.
There's a great channel called History for Granite that examines the pyramids very closely.
The Robber's tunnel has been patched up, he found great early pictures where you can see the large gaps before it was cleaned up and made tourist safe.
@@SacredGeometryDecoded Yes indeed, I'm sub'd to HFG :)
The Egyptians also re-cased structures. The sphinx temple is heavily weathered limestone underneath its granite casing.
Makes perfect sense, yet quite a feat and does still just adds more to the question of, Why, and for purpose.
Power
Every time you said, they put the outside on first and then they filled it in with junk, I took a drink. I'm quite drunk now
:))
Go outside first and fill it in with drunk
Thank you. It's been rough filtering through the ancient alien and ancient advanced civilization theories. I need valid theories with experimentation, and that's surprisingly hard to come by.
Makes sense in terms of building quickly and cost effectiveness. In the case of the Great Pyramid I would ask about structural integrity in relation to the chambers and shafts, seems to me that quite a lot of this masterpiece would have had to be made of carved blocks laid fairly precisely, not rubble and inferior workmanship.
There are also many, many questions to be asked about how other temples, monuments, statues, obelisks, underground chambers and tunnelling were accomplished. Not by rubbing 2 bits of limestone together.
Anyone who thinks this solves any mystery of Ancient Egypt needs a reality check.
The style of building with rubble inside and facing stones outside such as at the Cathedral explains the inner chambers, rubble piled up is very stable, like a dry stone wall if done with a little care it is exceptionally stable, same as clearly visible on outside of the pyramids, the smooth outside stones rest on the backing stones, like in a cathedral hallway the smooth stone is supported either side by rubble. All that's needed is the backing rubble has a few points of contact to be stable with the surface stones.
is there a single feature you consider to be impossible?I have been at this for a while and have tracked back the claims of precision and symmetry to their source. The claims of precision etc are grossly exaggerated, perhaps you could provide an example to give me a reality check. It really only takes one solid example, I have yet to see one. Many vague lists i get but no one ever seems to be able to point at something and show it can't be done.
Is there a single solid reality check.
If you've seen his channel and watched the full videos on Mike Haduck I linked in the description you'd know it's a lot more than rubbing two stones together. That's merely a single example of getting a surface flat such as casing stones.
If you'd like I can link videos I made showing to get granite a flat and polished with primitive tools. Easy to repeat although it was old news centuries ago.
@@SacredGeometryDecoded I will give you one, the Serapeum near the Djoser pyramid at Saqqara. I get that you are only saying construction and are not offering opinion on the movement and placing of artefacts, eg the Sarcophagi. I would love to hear how you propose these granite boxes were carved and finished to such a quality. If you are aware of the work of Christopher Dunn in terms of accuracy. How many years would you think it would take? Mind you that this is just one job.
A specific example that you asked for and yet no response.
Referring to some video of you "polishing" a cut piece of granite does not answer the question of parallel walls, precision cornering and walls that are within microns of being perfectly flat. Can you get that finish?
@@ronaldhill1233 th-cam.com/video/bEwxMFDRmek/w-d-xo.html
links on the description
The Saqqara Serapeum coffers have ZERO precision to them, those who are still selling this precision claim after many books and tour deals are frauds.
There is NO LEGITIMATE way to interpret the Saqqara Serapeum as any sort of example of precision.
Even by my noobish standards they are poorly made and finished.
You don't need fancy equipment, the ripples and pitting give it away froma distance just in the reflections.
Grinding and polishing to flat.
th-cam.com/video/a-EHHnBYaIg/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/ol2P7nEz-ac/w-d-xo.html
Yes i can beat the flatness, anyone can, the Whitworth 3 plate technique for making granite surface plates is based on the old school polishing methods.
It shouldn't have to be proved by me since there are entire industries where hand polishing precise instruments such as lens and mirror to flatness measured in nanometre. All based off of ancient mirror and other craftsman techniques.
Highly polished walls- floors or granite are strewn across the pre modern machining world.
It's cringe that those selling the " impossible" flatness either don't know the basics, or more likely given their tendency to suppress contrary info, they do know very well and are faking.
I am very aware of Chris Dunn thank you.
I other videos in this long series I can conclusively prove he is a fraud, not in error, but a deliberate falshood spreader.
th-cam.com/video/H-d8FZjS42Y/w-d-xo.html
In short the single experiment in the entirety of Lost High Ancient tech and grante cores was done by CHris Dunn, the guy faked it and did it with a machine.
I will repeat he faked the experiment, impossible to get only a 1mm taper with a top heavy hand powered drill.
In the link above I show his pictures from the Serapeum, his own squares do not fit, it's visible, indisputable, just like all the others who took a square and found the precision very IMPRECISE.
SOme people I may disagree on interpretation, but the facts are the pyramids are built with rubble infill and mortar, and the Saqqara Serapeum boxes are NOT PRECISE or special in any way except size. WHile the niches inthe tunnels give a 1001 anchor points to move or spin the coffers into place. Sand to lower them deeper ones down.
There's no evidence at all of precision, nothing questionable on how to make them with primitive tech.
Trihedral inner corner
th-cam.com/video/HQ2bHE7mTi4/w-d-xo.html
Although even the corner is basic, you see them everywhere amongst masonry. Cutting corners like that is an early part of learning the mason trade.
@@SacredGeometryDecoded So how does saying they used mortar and rubble to build answer the simple question on how ancient egyptians moved the rocks of which some weighed many tons? Just one quick example, like the massive obelisks?
Because we are talking about people who did not have the massive cranes we use today to build. The architects, precise measuring metals and modern day technology/equipment. these people barely had anything. I don't think they made a wooden crane and used a rope to hoist granite or limestone that weighed tons, that would snap easily.
This is wild I just tuned into your content and I already follow Mike Haddock. I’m also a mason from PA. I keep thinking about the distance from Aswan so many sites in Egypt are that feature that rose granite....dressing stones is one thing...transporting, staging, lifting and setting stones is another
Cheers. I have a few vids on ancient lifting tech but will update soon. The best way though is never to actually lift them. Always keep a part on the ground. Check out Wally Wallington if you haven't seen his videos on moving and erecting monoliths.
There's also these ways th-cam.com/video/BgekJnMeNiY/w-d-xo.html the second method- using sand (just like Wally) is also mentioned in an Egyptian text in regards to raising giant statues. I need to dig up that source though.
Hey man thanks for the links can’t wait to check them out cheers brother
They filled it all with junk.
I’ve built stuff, I cant build this kind of things with present day tools with this precision, why go that length to be precise in the first place? Who cares if one end of a50 foot house is 3 inches offset to the right or left. Cant tell it with your eyes and nobody is crazy enough to measure them to make sure they are straight.
Actual stone masons have no problems with this.. not those idiots like Christopher Dunn and co. which obv havent even worked stone.
I remember seeing this one years ago .. and i still chuckle.
So, basicly... What impresses us today, and really should, is the amazing amount of workhours they put into their monuments.
Thats the real achievement.
For some reason I see this on my phone but doesn’t show in comments on my PC? Sometimes edited comments go to ‘held for review’ but not there either.
How goes the megalith dog?
@@SacredGeometryDecoded Hm, maybe some kind of shadowban as ive commented on many ancient high tech vids lately .. they dont seem to like that and report me or something.
Doggo is doing pretty ok.
Thank you very much for this.
Mike Haduck Rocks!
That's the way we do it today😂
Who has built a stone structure half the size of the giza pyramid???
He explained nothing
How was the granite cut and lifted inside the kings chamber and others 50 ton blocks
His video is click bait. The scar on the side of the Menkare pyramid shows all the blocks on the inside of that pyramid. No rubble.
Thanks for your work, it's very important in this age of deception. They talk wonders about Egypt because they also want to regress civilization.
Great resources. Cheers.
Glad it was helpful!
th-cam.com/video/wHps6ongTGs/w-d-xo.html
a playlist of Mike Haduck videos at ancient sites, castles, cathedrals
But, but...ALIENS! I’m kidding. This is a fantastic video that should be shared everywhere. Thank you for sharing this. 👍
th-cam.com/video/wHps6ongTGs/w-d-xo.html
a playlist of Mike Haduck visiting ancient sites up to cathedrals and castles explaining the masonry techniques, the full videos often include demonstrations of stone properties and techniques
Not only that!!! Those aliens knew about pulley's. All is a lie even until today! This world system is build on lies!!!
Cement were used recently to preserve & to stop rain 🌧 going in now (DAMN ASS)
Excellent ! I am still a part of the smartest subspecies known to man, safe in the knowledge that men only snore to frighten snakes from the trees we used to sleep in. I suspected aliens had a sense of humour.
All this research on how the pyramids were build and all these experts couldn't just ask a real mason on they're opinion and they're common sense to solve the problem on how the Egyptians built the pyramids? Excellent guys you make so much sense. 👏👏👏🙂🇵🇷🇺🇸
How was the granite “shaved” down?
th-cam.com/video/xv70B0T3cUM/w-d-xo.html - flint tools work virtually as good as steel to shape granite
th-cam.com/video/a-EHHnBYaIg/w-d-xo.html - this one i wanted to grind to " precision" flat but the same principle for more rapid grinding but you'd use large grit instead of finer stuff
Somewhere I have an experiment with pounding stones, they work really well for smoothing as well
I'd prefer steel tools or better yet power tools but the old stuff works, steel isn't that much better. in some ways though the flint tools better, cheap and they are self sharpening, i tried a bit myself and its very surprising, a sharp thin edge stays even with heavy mallet strokes, very it does break off little slivers fall away leaving a fresh sharp edge
Not to mention how were the massive granite blocks lifted and placed with such precision?
Great overview. But how did they move and lift these big stones as they worked?
Brilliant as always Alan... seek and you shall not find LAHT
Sorry but :
- if it is filled with "junk", how come all stone floors are parallel ?
- how did they quarried/smoothed/place multi tonnes granite blocs in the center
- why is there knobs on the outside and inside of the pyramide?
- what is the proof that these pyramids were tombs again?
-if it was, they plainly were.
- I have posted sample demos of splitting, working , smoothing granite with simple tools. Sail rigging is basis of ancient and modern lifting tech. The images of their boats and surviving rope shows they skilled with knots. Simple knots like truckers hitch turns single piece of rope into a crane. No knowledge of mechanical advantage means you can’t sail into the wind. Plus they used shaduf so had understanding of lever and counterweight..
-why knobs? They make a great lever point for one thing
- whether tombs or not is irrelevant .
I think they might believe in a magical Sky man, and want to keep everything in that time frame
The Stone never lies 👍
They used *mortar*?! My dreams are crushed!
I can't stop giggling. Why do more people not mention this? First time I was so informed.
Ask an expert, someone with a lifetime of application of knowledge. I believe they call that wisdom.
Vadim left this in a later comment
Whoever quarried 400-1300 tonne blocks and cut them into perfectly symmetrical single piece statues(Luxor), is orders of magnitude superior in stone work and power to ANY cathedral worldwide. Whoever quarried 120 tonne pieces of granite and carved out internal dimensions parallel to each other on 7 feet with a 1/1000th of an inch margin of error, and replicated this over and over, has mastered physics and manufacturing process, period(precision granite boxes in the serapeum). Whoever worked stone like styrofoam in Egypt and arranged it in the millions of tons, can build rooms, believe me, idiotic to think otherwise. What defines Egypt is not rubble and mortar but megalithic polygonal build technique, massive structures that were never replicated again anywhere(pyramids), precision statues and boxes in the Saqqara, tunnels shooting straight into bedrock for 100s of feet with 80 tonne boxes in rooms they lead to, super engineered artifacts with an unknown to us purpose, like the schist disk, cardinal alignment of GP that we epically failed trying to attempt with a building a 1000 times smaller, in modern day, and much much more. This video is for the average dummy, for the naked eye so to speak. I know better, and have taken closer look. I hope you enjoyed your trip to Egypt though. You should do Cusco next, we need your expertise there. As that work is right there, in your face, humbling anyone who's ever held a chisel and mixed some mortar. "
It's a shame that people like him have to make things like up the precision in the stone, when just by running a light over them shadows and reflections give away the imperfections.
They don't really want any answers, they always bring up the polygonal thing, with a pantograph they make perfect replicas of elaborate sculpture, or better still fit shattered original stone to new pieces in restorations. Fitting the smooth curves of polygonal walls is no mystery compared to pure chaos of refitting shattered stone in 3D. But there's no mystery in seeing things done.
How far in does the “junk” rubble go cuz I’m thinking of the chambers inside with the shafts and such
Look up “ analysing the Egyptian pyramids in the digital age” around 30min mark onwards.
They show the internal structure a bit further.
Stronger walls inside , but not tight fitting stones, then the spaces filled with rubble.
Then in case of Great Pyramid, built on natural hill, no one knows for sure but the bedrock underneath might go up to support the chambers? That’s pure speculation though.
I have a video somewhere on the bedrock plugs under the two biggest Giza Pyramids.
Though the rubble and mortar itself is quite strong. The weight goes directly down so little care would have to be given to lateral forces.
@@SacredGeometryDecoded that was amazing! Not sure if that answered the question but I think that’s maybe because they were the first to do that work.. hopefully more will be done!
Finally! A rational person explaining it
Great job, as usual.
Thank you! Cheers!
And the red granite in the interior of the great pyramid? The finishing on it is exquisite having seen it personally, higher quality then the casing blocks.
I have filmed and posted a few videos on working with granite and primitive technology. Experiments such as bringing rough split face granite to " precision" flat surface. During that I was getting all the close ups of granite artefacts and temples to compare results.
The sarcophagus in Great Pyramis has cut marks , trace of a drill core and a surface that is on the low end of being honed. I did much better in my first two attempts. The walls are the same, the surface is still covered in puts and low spots. Even by hand working standards the standards of finishing are pretty average and inconsistent across each surface. Even as a total noob at grinding and polishing I don't see exquiistie work but rushed work. It takes max of 4 hours to bring split face block to a middle level reflective polish.
Even by the low standards the granite in the Great Pyramid is not high quality work.
Exactly how do you cut rose granite with hand tools? The stonemasons are speaking as if Egyptians had access to the same exact tools that they use. Modern stonemasons use electrical saws and diamond tipped drills. There are no depictions of Egyptians using any type of electrical saws or diamond tip drills when constructing the pyramids. In fact, there are no depictions of Egyptians building the pyramids. Yet I can find depictions of slaves washing the genitals of their masters.
Only a regression if they were built as a hall
layman terminology used throughout. Very well narrated and documented . Max kudos guys . Our intelligence is being insulted . Thanks for opening eyes and minds and introducing time served knowledge . Make a hollow pyramid ! Indeed for we can all pile rubble up .l
I'm a bit confused at what you're getting at here. are the implications that they just used normal technology to build pyramids and that's it? or, is there some hidden subtext I missed
Of course they used 'normal technology', what else would they use? They used the technology that was available to them at the time.
@@wodenravens yes, I know -- that's what I'm saying. that's why I asked him if he is trying to say something more, because in his other videos he shows how they deliberately made mistakes on the side lengths.
it sounds to me like he's saying they deliberately flubbed the side lengths to encode very incredible mathematical things and created an extremely accurate model of the earth in it with just rubble and mortar.
and this proves that they didn't have high technology? I'm having difficulty getting why he's trying to prove they used normal technology but then also that they purposefully flubbed the side lengths... there has to be another message he's trying to convey -- which is why I asked the question :)
as an analogy, it feels like he's trying to prove that a master chef made some jello.
@@kennybentley1161 I don't quite understand your point. Yes, the pyramids builders were not faultless. Yes, they were outstanding builders. Even the greatest dish in the world could have faults yet not need be 'jello'.
Tech vs knowledge. Todo the math or even take geodetic measures can be done with simple tools, such as measuring shadows in the way Eratosthenes measured the earth. Pi and phi and such with compass and straight edge.
Only basic tech required, good logic and reasoning.
Still a firm believer pre Greek people were good at geometry and taking observations.
In fact I think it’s more impressive when done with “primitive” tools to 99.5% accuracy compared to 99.999999% accuracy and later developments in tech.
The differences in size of base of Great Pyramid is 19.6cm between longest and shortest side. With a rope or measuring stick even a noob could do better than that. And surely someone would have double checked the all important lay out of the buildings foot print.
They even had a special ceremony for laying out orientation and foundations of a new build.
Stretching The Cord ceremony
Basic tech just well applied is all that’s necessary.
Still now craftsmen won’t polish the underside of a fancy grand piano the way they do the top and sides.
The ugly rubble inside was never meant to be seen.
So how did they manage to shape those massive granite blocks in the Valley temple? No mortar either there. Also, when they speak about the pyramids it sounds as if they were talking about a cottage. How in h_ll did they solve the logistics and internal areas? How did they manage to keep the pyramids so straight, etc?? One more thing - nobody has been talking about "no mortar" in the filling stones of the pyramids, but rather the casing stones, and elsewhere, like in Peru.
How did they manage to shape the granite blocks?
th-cam.com/video/xv70B0T3cUM/w-d-xo.html Shaping granite is no issue with the tools they had, if detailed carving can be done then shaping blocks is trivial. Not including other techniques such as fire setting to speed up the work of pounding stones.
Logistics? In the records of early Egypt such as on the Palermo stone it shows they were a sophisticated civilisation. Apart from a regular census they even had special ones such as a census of the Goldsmiths. Schools of Life- scribe schools, Seshat the Goddess of accounting. Logistics of arming and supplying armies for foreign campaigns.
Internal areas wouldn't have been internal during construction, I linked the full videos of Mike Haduck in description box, he goes inside and shows the places where bracing was placed, to keep the walls in place until the stone around it was laid and locked everything down.
There are still cedar bracing beams to be found inside the Bent Pyramid and others too such as Meidum.
Inside the pyramid there are many deviations and faults such as in the shafts, Upper chamber.
I have been following this for a while and the big names in Lost Ancient HIgh Technology - Ancient Aliens speak of each block being precisely cut and laid and there being no mortar. If no one was talking about "no mortar" then why are so many people surprised to learn about the mortar?
The few times I hear the mortar mentioned is to declare it is " only exterior repair work" because of the carbon dating.
check the mortar layers - a completely different technique than building a tower out of rubble
Great interpretation and presentation.
Would you hazard a guess on when the first snake was pinned atop the sphinx? I have only seen pictures.
No idea, though crowns of lower and upper Egypt used a snake.
Wadjet of lower Egypt way back to earliest dynasties. All that type of history not really in my wheel house.
I rely mostly on Dr Google for that kind of thing.
Just curious as it seems the earliest human 'addition' to existing stone. I am open to evidence.
@@SacredGeometryDecoded l was expecting the opinion of stonemasons .Possibly barking up the wrong tree but as a lazy brain I try to rely on experience if a close up and personal type is involved.
IMPRESSED you polished granite.
@@davepowell7168 th-cam.com/video/ol2P7nEz-ac/w-d-xo.html
playlist of granite experiments, from making the abrasives through to drilling, cutting , polishing the primitive way
@@SacredGeometryDecoded I have a 45cm disc to polish.
Thanks a lot. My girlfriend loves you and is ordering the stuff 💕
How did they cut and smooth the casing in place?
Abrasion, splitting, pounding stones
Dio Brando you forgot copper tools and a wooden mallet.. lol
There are demos of people using those tools and they work. Flint tools on granite are self sharpening as they flake.
To fit shattered stones together in restoration work they still use ancient masons device - pantograph. There’s nothing lol about tools that work.
You should look into them and see what can be done.
It’s a persistent myth this copper tool thing. The people selling the impossible with copper and stone tools carefully censor the demonstrations.
I have filmed and posted several demos that anyone can repeat.
Those who make a living pointing at stones can’t even be bothered trying but talk as if they know what they are saying.
That is an LOL but really it’s more sad than anything.
They still carry on about flatness and precision.
Ninth Heretic For the reasoning mind your statements are beyond absurd.. I guess we landed on the moon too! Cognitive dissonance is a hellava drug!
The truth is no one knows
i was just there wish i had seen this video before i visited Giza
I like how nobody knows how the pyramids were built but this guy has all the answers I'm so sure dude. Don't speak for Egypt speak on your own culture
Building is building and has nothing to do with culture. Look at how the thing is put together.
Nobody knows? Without a time machine it’s impossible to know exact process.
How about you don’t speak at all.
This guy is a mason with experience and actually shows the place rather than wave his hands in the air hiding behind “it’s all a mystery nobody knows.”
The pyramids are piled blocks with mortar in the gaps. Corbeled grand gallery and more blocks piled.
The bottom half contains 85% of the volume.
A vaulted ceiling or something like the pantheon of blue mosque is a more complex build.
I guess that’s a mystery no one can answer and you must be if that culture to look at it.
Stfu
Was the same technique used inside the pyramids?
@@dogscats5420 indeed it might be just that! I am open to all theories, my guess is l will not k ow this in my lifetime lol
@Bringmea Bananaleaf as l said l am open to all conclusions, and sorry to dissapoint you on this but have to work too from time to time, have not read or seen yet the link you did send me. As soon as l have l will get back to you...
Fair point but what about the stones they quarried that were in excess of a 1000 tonnes? And the sheer precision of some of them?
The Unfinished obelisk and the large stones in Baalbek are all still attached tot he Earth, and far from precise in their condition. The Ramses Ozymandias statue was that heavy but the " precision" is claimed rather than shown. The large statues at Karnak and Luxor are claimed to be precise but that is based on photography that had a grid placed over it in photoshop. They haven't been measured as precise.
Though in recent years a giant statue was built in India for the Jains, using a plumb line and ruler to plot out the small model to the giant statue they maintained one inch over the whole thing.
@@SacredGeometryDecoded that is bs, have a look at the work of Christopher Dunn, even Flinders Petrie in the 1880's was aware of the precision, but could not prove it.
Thx
That looks like a big roller cuter / grinder at 9:20. Not some one beating on it.
I see these a lot it's all so simple then from deep inside the pyramid there's an 80-ton Granite block been there shafts pointing at Orion carved through the rebel?
You can see old photos of masons moving and lifting heavy blocks into much more precarious positions with ancient tools.
There is an argument s as bout those shafts alignments but the shafts themselves kink and are not “precise” or exceptionally well made.
I hear that “heavy block” and “alignment/precision” thing all the time as well. These “it’s too hard” or it “can’t be done” people.
@@SacredGeometryDecoded although I do agree with you that ancient people have more knowledge than we give them credit for I think there was a society much more advanced than we are in almost every way who moved these blocks you may have seen them move some blocks but not blocks of a hundred or a thousand tons you need to look into how hard it is to build something to exact specifications although not impossible it is very difficult go get a granite rock and start banging on it with a copper chisel and you'll see what I mean there are so many mathematical equations in the pyramid it's a little hard to believe that it's all coincidental bottom line is we have no idea how this was done
Everyone knows they used mortar but what kind"" no one knows!
The only way we gonna know is if we build one
Cement were used recently to preserve & to stop rain 🌧 going in now (DAMN ASS)
Ohh, and added ancient organic material to it as well I suppose. Builders often make gypsum mortar and add tonnes of burnt 4500 year old timber to it.
And yes, yes you absolutely are.
Have you seen the floating theory?
👍 . you're not wrong. ancient aliens are obviously marketable tho no doubt about it. lol.
That's all it is, marketing scamming & priming.
Like nasa, all primed by gobbles & employed von Braun
Have you read his book about going to Mars?
The group who goes to Mars was called ...
*ELON*
There are also the other things Werner blew the whistle on prior to his death
Terrorists
Asteroids (may have been replaced with "viruses -ala covid)
Alien invasion
All theater for the masses.
They couldn’t build large open rooms, or.. they didn’t need it.
So the used mortar on the pillars but they not supposed to know about it to use it on the pyramids? WTF? How you think the kings were able to change the names that were carved when they became the ruler?
And yet they made that little tiny shaft with big H blocks, not some weird drilling, or easy back filling.
So what are the nubs? 🙂
Points for shoring ups points and lifting bosses. They were used widely in recorded ancient history,
In Egypt the broken off nubs were found amongst the debris. Sarcophagi still have them attached and some have them broken off but not completely polished out such as the Serapeum at saqqara.
Any ideas why the great pyramid was built?!
go watch Ancient Aliens 🤣🤣🤣
plenty of "ideas"
4:56 "...bhaadum..."
The blocks of the Great Pyramid are made of concrete. Yes, the Egyptians had the advanced technology of concrete. Look it up.
th-cam.com/video/hDK3oqke3CI/w-d-xo.html
k2019 is a scam, the blocks were quarried and gypsum mortar was used.
🤣🤦 You know what I love about this idiotic claim = the sheer facile logic it represents......... To create blocks from a mixture and a mold - to say nothing of tens of thousands if not millions of them = is exponentially *MORE* labor intensive and resource intensive than simple quarrying of blocks. Ironic how the "geopolymer" idiots never seem to figure this out. 🤷
So here is your freebie:
1 - first of course you need your mixture = literally tons and tons of it.
2 - this means since you lack a local construction/hardware box store to simply purchase what you require = you must make it yourself.....
3 - this means you must:
a - mine in vast quantities the requisite minerals etc. and convert those into usable form.
b - all that must be transported to where it would be required.
c - you must then create your mix - which means vast containers and mixing implements are required.
d - all of that must then be poured into your molds...... - oh - did we forget about the molds.
4 - so you will additionally require wooden molds = quite a lot of them actually. You see no matter how careful you will invariably damage molds in the process of using them which will increase your requirements as far as numbers needed and importing a lot of wood to create them.
5 - finally your blocks upon curing - which means a lot of time wasted until then - must be removed from your molds and placed = hopefully without damaging them.....
Meanwhile to quarry blocks you need manpower - which the corvee supplied. You need quarrying tools of which you have an endless supply of gneiss stone tools as well as bronze which can be recycled and recast when required. You have individuals skilled in creating and maintaining these tools + skilled in quarrying techniques. Finally you need food etc. to support your workforce = which again they already had. So which constitutes the larger effort then.......... 🤨
Everything in this video we learned in 6th grade.
Makes me feel like the Pyramids labour and material could have been used for more exquisite structures 😂
Romans built more accurately and with more material than the Pyramids but they put it all to the good use of making aqueducts. Massive infrastructure projects rather than vanity projects.
Black man showing who the real master is 😜
Your not the first with this information. In the 60's I used to be impressed by the Erich Von Däniken books, until I read a refutement work in the early 70's which was called, Some Believe In Chariots, I think. It was written by a group of Australian professors who took apart his theories in a way which was far more believable than Von Däniken's imagination. Since then I have ignored all ancient technology theorists.
Nobody said he was the first, he never said he was the first. He's just trying to explain the truth and pull some people's head out of their asses. He's literally exposing indoctrination and their attempt to keep us from progressing civilization
@J Beezy Von Daniken flat lied. He cropped photos to make Mesoamerican art look like elephants and rocket ships. His Nazca Lines as parking for starships omits that the lines are so close higher they wouldn't do for a car park. It goes on and on. Try the book *Crash Go the Chariots* for another debunk. If you must have video, NGS had a special on why it was obvious fabrication.
An example [for me] of someone who apparently knows a great deal about a subject of which I am quite ignorant, but their explanatory power is lacking. They presume [for me] that I, the listener, have some basic understanding of their specialty which I do not have. Good masons poor teachers. Also, please speak into the camera and not away from it. {Maybe I'm just stoopid}.
I saw a TV documentary on the Pyramids which was done by an engineer and he came up with his version of how they were built which pretty much ties up with your theory. He reckons each level was an outer layer of the nice casing stone and the internal bit was just back filled and repeated at each layer. Interestingly he pointed out that the amount of blocks that were supposedly used didn't match the the volume that had been left in the quarry they had used. Something else that no one takes into consideration is the fact that if 20million blocks were used and it was constructed in 22 years, that means the each block would have to have been quarried, transported, shaped and put in place every 5 minutes which is just not possible. It would be good if you guys did a piece on the granite boxes that have been found and have been hand carved to a ridiculous precision.
impossible? minutes? are you kidding
1440 minutes / 5 = 288 blocks / day / 10,000 people
@@szpakmateusz8500 That's just the inner blocks by the way, it doesn't take into account the casing blocks, the construction of the internal chambers, the levelling of the bedrock....shall I go on? just not humanly possible in 22 years I'm afraid.
@@andyd2033 efficiency / time - your argument
in theory it is possible ...
you said so .... 1 block / 5 minutes or
288 blocks per day ..
2,500,000 blocks in 20 years
@@szpakmateusz8500 so it’s possible to quarry, transport, shape and then manoeuvre in place a block every 5 mins....are you crazy. You left out the quarry, transporting and shaping of the casing stones, the shaping of the bedrock, the blocks used around the bedrock. You seriously need to sit down and do the math. The historians have got it seriously wrong on how long it took to build one of these things.
@@andyd2033
1 block / 5 min - it sounds so "scary" - TV shows;)
but 288 blocks / day - it's not so "magical "anymore
Tell us how they carved the pillars with the lotus top! This video is so lame.
Your take on the working of the stone is great, but make no mention of the overall mathematical precision and incorporation of pi, phi, etc, nor the astrological calculations and alignments. That stuff is a whole other kettle of fish, I guess.
I have hundreds of videos on the math and other features f the Pyramids, as well as the same thing has been used through time in public buildings and city plans right up until today. By a select group of architects.
Here are a couple of Pyramid playlists aout the math, measures, astronomy etc.
th-cam.com/video/2I0eDDz4yfI/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/play/PL47iaGB6hlT4MnmRZmIMqvBRqQQIam13N.html
very poor assessment, they talk about those 1000 ton rocks as if moving them was not a big deal, no word on precission, no tlk about perfect measures and alignments.
- So true. They overlook the Blue Whale in the koi pond.
@Bringmea Bananaleaf the base base rocks placed under the pyramid are similar to the balbek blocks
@Bringmea Bananaleaf they carve big part of bedrock but others are very heavy granite cut and place with high precession, you claim not to be ignorant do your research, don’t just believe garbage like this old men in the video
@Bringmea Bananaleaf there no fairy tales, people bypass the fact that we cannot even understand how they build the pyramids, they losely say how they did, but in practicality it is impossible to engineers currently to replicate it, you have to keep an open mind man, don’t be so fanatical about the things you learn, take a look at some ideas here th-cam.com/video/KFuf-gBuuno/w-d-xo.html don’t reject it without even consider other possibilities
I have drilled several different types of granite with different abrasives. Posted how to videos do anyone can replicate it.
The problem is you’re getting your info from terrible sources.
If these lost high tech guys can’t work out how to create flat surfaces or drill granite then their opinions on more complex details will surely be lacking.
I have filmed and posted how to videos directly contradicting the false facts promoted by lost high technology.
Good video, no mention of drill cores and holes that are scattered all around the pyramids. Thats kind of odd to say the least.
That's kind of odd to say the least?
th-cam.com/video/A4RAzgvOTgw/w-d-xo.html
A playlist of experiments in granoite including many videos on every aspect of the core drilling.
I have filmed how to drill stone cores in granite using the tools the Egyptians themselves show themselves using. It's cheap quick and easy to do, there is no mystery in core drilling, replicating every feature described as " impossible" by those who promote the " enigma of the stone cores".
The striations, the tapering, the polishing...everything said to be impossible or mysterious are features you can't avoid making if you use primitive techniques.
If you want to win some bets you can repeat what I have done here. Scientists Against Myths is another great channel to follow. They bust a lot of these myths with repeatable demonstrations as well.
To be blunt the core drilling thing is a big scam, most of the the channels pushing it censor the information that contradicts their claims. The rest are just repeating what they hear from the bigger channel.s
If they just spent a few dollars and a few hours doing a real experiment that whole thing would be settled.
Not add at all if you think about it. Ask yourself a simple question. Would a Pharaoh want a temple or whatever built from blocks with holes drilled into them for no apparent reason??? Answer: no = unless recycled stone was being used. Giza was first constructed in the Old Kingdom. Later during the New Kingdom it saw restoration as Thutmose IV's Dream Stele tells us. Again during the Late Period prior to the Persian invasion it again saw additions to it. Finally in between the various dynasties Egypt was fragmentary representing various zones of control under Viziers. Also Pharaohs sometimes cannibalized Old and Middle Kingdom sites for raw materials to build other things.
Thus do not assume just because what you reference was found at Giza that is has to date to the time of Giza's creation. As alluded to Giza itself was added to - and cannibalized for stone to build other things - throughout its existence. Thus for all you know those cores might have been done later using iron tools rather than bronze. They may represent "cast off" stone or stone from other things repurposed to build something.
Final thought. In the surrounding cemeteries at Giza the tombs of the workmen supervisors have stone facades - likely cast off stone as noted from other construction there which they used to create their own tombs. To consider a technology used you must place the object in the correct time frame.
What makes it a regression is we've lost contact with the majestic, harmonic roots. In a strictly material sense, perhaps the current product can be considered 'progression'. However, with a deeper understanding of the many levels of knowledge built into one single structure, today's is comparatively ant poop on an ant shoe.
@Ninth Heretic What is in Chartres is the same as in the pyramids. I'm not sure what you mean by 'profane' buildings being encoded. Perhaps you could explain a little more.
@Ninth Heretic Do you think modern architects have "keys" to ancient knowledge ?? or that the "Masonic" interpretation of symbols is unique and faultless ??
Do you prefer baroque, gothic or classical order?
@Ninth Heretic Your religious experiences and conclusions are your private "matter" .. I only prefer to talk about "crafts";) ancient temples were mainly available only to "priests", and today for tourists;).
your last interesting vid;) Romanesque style chapel, although rebuilt;) I also recommend Maastricht
Hagia Sophia and the Quadrivium
th-cam.com/video/q3rOdkfQgAc/w-d-xo.html
My earliest videos were on Australia, especially a few people like Gov Macquarie who set out a pattern of town design and street widths etc. All very hermetic. Also architects like Barnet and Blackett.
They embedded this in the designs of major public buildings.
The sameg in other Australian capitals, Canberra is a textbook on it, in city plan and the buildings.
But it is in Perth also, original and modern, St George Terrace is 1.5 miles or 7920 feet or 5280 cubits long.
Also the old cathedral there by James Barnet, you;ll find all the measures and proportions there.
Later the old Bond Tower Building and that circle monument thingy on the river bank. All by the numbers, where the ancient measure units converge on the harmonics.
@@SacredGeometryDecoded I didn't know that about st george's terrace, but yes, I'm aware of the harmonic's being built into buildings by particular architects. Usually, but not exclusively, linked to governance of some kind. The blue and red mosques are beautiful, yet another place I've had the privilege to visit, Istanbul. What I thought you were referring to in the vid was architecture in general, not the buildings encoding the ancient metaphysics. Thanks for the reply, and I will check out that link.
That’s not “mortar” that’s bits and pieces of rock and sand that they dumped into areas that were weathered or destroyed over time. Haha go inside the pyramid and show me the mortar they used. There’s literally nothing but solid granite in the grand gallery, kings chamber, queens chamber. All solid rose quarts or granite.
The grand gallery and queens chamber are limestone. The kings chamber is granite.
It is mortar. It is beneath stone as well.
It’s a gypsum mortar and has been analysed for chemical composition.
Haha
@@SacredGeometryDecoded ha funny no it’s not. I’ve actually been inside lmao the kings chamber contains solid granite blocks in excess of 100 tons at an elevation of 300ft +. Idk what you’re smoking. It’s a fact that the great pyramid contains granite and rose quartz. Besides you can’t cut granite with copper either. Also no mortar used in any of the ancient structures in Peru. Also no you can’t fit a razor blade in between the near perfect blocks of granite. You’re talking about the outside of the pyramid in your video. Not the inside. It’s well known that the outside was filled will rubble before the casing stones were placed because it was easier. You also contradict yourself. You claim that they quarried these stones 400km away brought them to the Giza plateau only to cut them into smaller blocks when they got there? Makes absolutely no sense. Why wouldn’t they cut them into smaller blocks to make transportation easier? You “archaeologists” not that you are one don’t know a damn thing about engineering. You fools try and claim these structures were built with copper tools and pounding stones. I’d like to see you cut a block of granite or rose quarts with copper tools, you’ll probably die before you finish which is why it’s never been replicated to this date. Even the ancient Egyptians claim their civilization was one of inheritance during the time when the “gods walked amongst men”. The great pyramid is far older than previously believed. Over 2 million individual blocks including limestone, granite, and rose quartz. Allegedly completed in 25 years hahaha what a JOKE. They want us to believe that every man woman and child of the entire kingdom were working night and day for 25 years straight, averaging a stone block cut, moved and lifted within 2mins for each. Bring any stone Mason or engineer and have them explain it to you because obviously you were too ignorant to do so on your own. You guys hinge your belief on the fact that the only tools you found were copper ones, yet we know for fact that certain sophisticated items have been found like the Antikitherya mechanism, which had techniques and mechanisms we don’t fully understand today and we only found 1 example. Just because it hadn’t been found yet dosent make it a prerequisite to not exist. Everyone’s starting to wake up to this bullshit dogmatic origin of civilization you guys cling to. Humans have been around for 800k years yet you think we only started building stuff 6,000 years ago lmao and you were PROVEN wrong when Gobekli Tepi was discovered, completely up ending you’re entire argument. That’s why you fools had to change the definition of “Hunter Gatherers” instead of admitted y’all were wrong. It’s only a matter of time until you idiots are brushed aside. Also take s look at the companies researching the great pyramid, they’re all Astro physics, material science, etc investigating it. They actually understand the enigma that is the Giza pyramid. Even the CIA acknowledges it in their Adam and Eve story they declassified recently. Do your research. COPPER CANT CUT GRANITE
@@fullsendcirca9255 I have cut and drilled granite and basalt with copper and posted the videos for anyone to repeat the experiment.
It’s cheap and easy to test.
The rest is a word salad since I already said the kings chamber is granite. You said the grand gallery and queens chamber were granite.
Your opinion on stones and mortar are as far from reality as your ideas on cutting granite.
Modern gang saws using iron blades don’t cut granite with the blades either. The abrasive does the cutting. Just like the paper don’t do squat in sand paper accept to push the abrasive across the material you are working.
Your ignorance is only over matched by your confidence.
Btw the blocks in the chambers above kings chamber weren’t out there before the stones beneath it. The thing of their height is an idiotic point. Steel beams in a sky scrapers top floor are 1000 feet from the ground. The grand gallery angle of 26 degrees also found in ramps from ancient quarries. At that height the pyramid would still be the size of a football field.
You are out of your league here buddy. I’ve heard it all and done many of the things your cult insists are impossible.
Not that I should have needed to, the principles were well understood millennia ago.
Nice try champ but you’ve brought a wet sponge to a gun fight.
Can’t cut granite with copper. That’s the war cry of the lost high tech fantasist. 😂
What next? Something about Mohs scale I bet. Just a heads up window glass has the same mohs hardness rating as mild steel.
I’ve heard it all sonny. Just with these comments I know you are just a parrot of lost high tech talking points. That you say then with such pride and confidence also tells me you are a goose. You’ve latched on to this cult hook, line and sinker.
It's a bit too "far" what you are talking about;)
Baalbek, Angkor Wat, Greek, Roman temples and palaces, Inca walls etc ?? mortar and rubble? maybe only the "Chinese Wall" and contemporary reconstructions
The cathedrals from the 19th century are not the same as from the Middle Ages
Pyramids - not rubble - but a structure made of leveled platforms otherwise they would collapse ..
cement mortars? ..lime mortars are a completely different story .. There is no need to compare reinforced concrete structures to the ancient ones .. no progress, only short-term copies ..
Grand cathedrals such as Chartres go back a little further than nineteenth century. No megalith structure has a decent living space
But the pyramids are made of rubble and mortar. That’s just a fact
Though Inca walls have similar construction. Nice looking for on outside. Look from behind and not so nice.
Smaller ones like Cusco are decent enough but smaller than Bomarsund fortress and other later Cyclopean walls.
Mike haduck has a cool video on Virgin Islands masonry. Two masons in the 70’s built some cool irregular stone walls.
Gypsum mortars not too different from modern mortar. Hardens over time. And mortars need to be less strong than the brick / stone
The Mike haduck video on bent pyramid is worth a look.
But either way the reality remains the pyramids are majority roughly hewn blocks and gypsum lime mortar,
It was the standard building practice and seen in other sites
The mortarless construction, precision cut thing is a myth
@@SacredGeometryDecoded "The mortarless construction, precision cut thing is a myth" - I don't think so, rather precise cuts and clamps .. especially for large blocks. I believe you are completely confusing the masonry techniques
@@szpakmateusz8500 the footage shown here is pretty conclusive in regards to the pyramids. At Luxor you can see stone clamps/ties still in place, not 15 feet from where a clamp is missing, guess which one gets shown all the time as a mystery?
The guides there make a point of showing the surviving stone .
Though if they used metal ties ..., they had metallurgy.
I haven’t seen anything that can’t be explained within archaeological evidence, replicated with experiments or still not being practiced by traditional masons.
Only the direct evidence of Egyptians using cranes. But they made shadufs and rugged ships for sail. Lever, counterweight and rigging. Literally all the pieces of ancient cranes.
@@SacredGeometryDecoded Where do you want to sail? by the Nile? or the sea ?? From Aswan to Giza? do you need sails and cranes ??
joints without mortar are not myths or mysteries - just a different non-standard technique, I have no doubt that mortar was used in the pyramids
No mention of the inner chambers or any other details of the interior design...hmmm...
All those Mike haduck videos full length show internals. Including the points for bracing the internals as they were filled around. But same as exterior racing stones but on smaller scale. Internals make a tiny fraction of overall.
In older videos have shown them, such as kings chamber, close ups show not very well finished and gaps in between in places
No looking for the full video links below...hmmm!
Everyone knows that it ain’t no difference than nobody knows no how. Just junk.
These two guys really irritate me , there's just so much they're missing and failing to regard.
Remembering the fact they are more than likely in the MASONS !
Hence the fact they picked out
St John the divines cathedral !
And your comment at the end completely disagree with with .
It's actually a very ignorant comment.
It’s actually a very ignorant comment.
I respond in kind. It’s ignorant to compare stacked lintel style construction to high thin walls supporting a vaulted stone ceiling.
Just by describing out the construction technique it is evident.
That you had to mention St John Cathedral as a “Masonic” dog whistle. When you can find the same technique everywhere where masonry is practised shows you come at this from a political angle. Not a stone masonry angle.
That you need to poison the well in this way says a lot.
I don’t like a fact, it must be Masons, therefore....
In this video did they ever explain their opinion of how the Egyptians were cutting the granite facing stones which are much harder than limestone?
On his channel he has demo’s with granite. I have a bunch myself cutting granite with copper.
Though those casing stones don’t seem to have been cut.
Granite especially splits and breaks very well.
Shaping it with stone tools is little different than steel tools.
I also have a series on Aswan quarry that goes into that.
th-cam.com/video/-_1GceufZuM/w-d-xo.html
Here’s some info on cutting granite, the majority of what’s on TH-cam is very wrong, usually citing a nearly 30 year old clip that doesn’t include the larger context.
Granite in general was not used much in the Giza Pyramids if you look. In the Great Pyramid and Khafre's it is only found around the inner chambers/sarcophagi. Menkaure used it as facade for his - but his pyramid is a fraction of the size of the other 2. So immediately you must take into account that the amount seen is really not a large quantity.
Further if you look at Menkaure's pyramid many of the granite blocks on the bottom are still rough. This lends to 2 possibilities. First is that the pyramid was not yet finished at the time of his death. So they might have still be smoothing out the granite casing stones and did not finish. That is not unusual as work typically stopped upon the death of the Pharaoh.
The alternative is that the pyramid previously being damaged and looted saw renovation during the 26th Dynasty - which similarly was not finished. There is evidence of his tomb being looted early on and during the later "Late Period" just prior to the Persian conquest of Egypt - Giza saw some renovation. Menkaure got a new wooden coffin - the remains of which is in the British Museum - and a new granite sarcophagus which was lost at sea when the ship carrying it to England sank in a storm.
So bronze saws and abrasives can cut granite. Also it can be pounded out using gneiss stone like dolerite and then sanded smooth using a flat block and abrasive. Final thought. As noted the amount involved here is a fraction of the total stone used. They would have known approximately how much was needed before the foundation of the pyramid was laid. Thus the quarry would have had literally years to quarry and transport the needed stone to Giza before placement on the pyramid. Quarries run in continuous operation and thus partially quarried stone is always on hand.
See where the blocks are not uniform. It is easier to shape existing blocks to the fit than to purposely fabricate an entire block. So it appears they using whatever granite was quarried simply "adjusted" it to fit in a given space resulting in the lack of uniformity you see. If as the LAHT claim they had some supposedly "advanced" technology then common sense says we should see standardized blocks like you see today with bricks etc. of a uniform size/shape/consistency - which we don't. They were removing stone from available bedrock seams yielding various sized blocks and then shaping those to fit.
@@varyolla435 I said that the 'facing stones' were granite. The mostly missing facing stones that were taken away by construction looters over the past few thousand years.
The one inscription found inside the great pyramid that claims that it was built for Kufu has been discredited. No proof that it was built at that time. I suspect the Sphinx is even older than any pyramid.
@@David35687 Sorry your reading issues complicate you ability to understand what is stated by others.
One more time. The amount of granite blocks seen is small. If you wanted to argue against fabricating thousands or tens of thousands of granite blocks you may have an argument vis a vis logistics - but you're not. The amounts involved were doable while the tools at had were sufficient.
As an aside. Upon what great trove of evidence do you declare the workman graffiti is fake??? Parroting dubious claims that "you" happen to believe does not make them real I'm afraid. Perhaps one day you'll understand this. The area of the relieving chambers was only accessible at the time of construction. The graffiti itself mirrors other seen in Egypt.
The covering stones of the solar boat pits has similar red ocher paint graffiti on it - save for it references Dejedefre who followed his father Khufu as Pharaoh. At Saqqara there are similar workman markings on covering blocks of Sneferu's pyramids. In 2013 at Wadi al-Jarf where Merer's diary was discovered there were stone blocks dumped into an area near the caves. On some of those blocks = red ochre paint graffiti referencing work gangs - again related to Khufu. Facts as John Adams famously quipped are _"stubborn things."_
Is this guy for real the pyramids are over 4 000.000 years old and of cause there,s going to be some movement and cracks in the stone blocks though movement over time i just wonder if this mason built a grave stone would it last that long.
Are you for real? in 4million years the amount of erosion would cut down a mountain.
Links to his full videos in description, in the Menkaure video at the end he goes to a graveyard and looks at what happens to limestone in a century.
You might as well say the pyramids are 1000 billion trillion years old.
You’re disproving your own point by bringing up erosion of gravestones.
There is mortar linking those blocks, they obviously not like that because of movement, unless by magic the casing stones are exempted from the same forces.
🤦♂️
right limestone junk and mortar was used for the inner. how did they cut the granite facing stones? how did they corey them? how did they move them? also is no mortar between the facing stones, they fit perfect. you even show it in your video. you debunked nothing, or answered any questions.
How did they cut grantie facing stones? By asking that question it suggests you don't have an answer in which case I suggest you aren't in a position to judge if something has or hasn't been debunked. If you're not interested in traditional granite quarrying and working techniques and finding those answers, that are freely available, then you are not interested in this topic. From fine detailed carving all the way back to the quarrying process simple " primitive" tools work fine, and we find those tools littering the work sites.
@@SacredGeometryDecoded i know what is said, ball hammers and coper chisels. and it was built in 20 years. all BS. just because you find "primitive tools" littering the work site means nothing. thats like if someone dug up a train car 3k years from now and read the graffiti on the side and say "o this was made by a primitive cultures named the bloods and crips. there was an advanced civilization that was lost. they built the pyramids and they were not tombs. what happened to them IDK. but that is the question we all should be asking.
@@abhvgas if it’s BS on that time frame, and I never pushed that, or that it was a tomb either, then you’d know how long it takes? Then you’d be able to show it took so many years at least.
Having gone out of my to actually do various experiments in primitive stone work, as well as looking for others, I am confident and going to be very direct and honest with you.
You don’t know. You believe it to be true. But you don’t know.
@@SacredGeometryDecoded lol yes i dont know. i even say "IDK" ALL i know is what main stream academia say is not true. A) a primitive culture with stone hammers and coper chisels did not build them. B) they were not intended to be the resting place of some pharaoh. how long it takes is a dependent on the technology used in construction. when they were built, is just a guess. but if we know about the people and their building technology and tools we can eliminate the currant idea based on that alone. ill be blunt, if you think they quarried, hauled them (some up to 50 tons)500 miles and assembled with those tools, and with the amount of precision with stone hammers and copper your dreaming. to just to move one stone 10 tons 500 miles would be a feat almost imposable for the people that apparently built the pyramids. yet thats what we are told to believe. and you seam to believe it too.
@@abhvgas moving a 10 ton stone 500 miles, like floating it down the Nile from a quarry that is mostly flooded every year, to sites that are a short distance from the river. A half kilometre in flood from river in flood season.
The distance thing should be expressed, half mile at most to river, then half mile from river.
Moving a ten tonne stone that distance. Wally Wallington wouldn’t even get a sweat going with a 20t stone on his own.
He doesn’t use a double hitch knot
Duh!
NY😂
lol
They are an eye sore, demolish them....
OMG I actually watched the video. Its hilarious, or sad. Really cant decide, its pretty dam hilarious. The whole video is basically, its a pyramid, it like made of rock and stones. Some are smaller some are bigger. They are like pieced it together, there like stones like there's stones behind the stones. Its all like together into one big giant stone pyramid. See there's some mortar in that crack in the stone, no different then today because masons call it rubble construction. As you know, 5000 years ago they were using outdated rock placing techniques.
They need to place the rock, on top of the rock, to make a rock house. Because its simple, in masonry its like rocks placed on top of other rocks. And look there's mortar between the cracks. Ah. I see now I was to harsh in calling these people names. But still. It had to be done least the consensus among the ignorant reign. Freaking hilarious video. Its hard to know if there for real, or just joking. These guys dont even know what the argument that is against modern archeology claim of the pyramids being built even is.
I did not know t his entire video was a comedy. For a second I took it for a serious
For those interested solairable has been triggered and keeps leaving new comment threads.
To put it in a nutshell he even invented a mountain range right up against the Nile.
For some reason seeing reality spurns this crowd to invent bigger and better fictions to protect the fundamentalist religion.
It’s pretty much useless sharing info or providing answers to questions. Facts have no place in their cult.
Stone is magic and so only magicians can do any stone work.
Isn’t always the way though. The loudest people are the incompetent ones screaming it can’t be done because everyone is as incompetent and tool shy as I am.
@@SacredGeometryDecoded Dude give it a rest. The world does not revolve around you and your pyramid theories. In fact does not revolve around me or any of us. You know what it revolves around? The sun. Ain't none of this important that's for sure. . Just dont take yourself so serious.
@@solairable then why do you keep starting new threads. This is my channel after all, where else would I be? Inventing mountain ranges and now inventing yourself as some sort of victim. First the other boys were mean to you😞
Now you’re being harassed because people respond to you. How dare they reply to your long factfree rambling comments, made as if you know a single thing about the topic you pretend to care about.
You have to be the Mount Olympus of lacking in self awareness.
You came here Einstein and made a bunch of comments. Even complaining about being replying to you,
I have an ego yes. But much of that is built on the fact that at least I am not like you.
Lol 🤣🤣🤣
Sure mate, just put some rubble and use mortar and you're done!
Take a look at some of UnchartedX documentaries and then come back and try to make a pyramid with all the correct geometrical precision, halls and corridors inside, instead of throwing random words out of your mouth...
Since he never shows any precision, but does say the word a lot, maybe you could come up with an example. Or maybe you’re just parroting BS because you’ve heard the lie so many times you’ve come to believe it without question.
Though I am not sure the logic of referencing a guy who claims the pyramids were precisely cut and laid blocks. Is he really the person you want to reference?
The video shows what the pyramids are made from. That it triggers you to see truth tells me a lot. That you’d point to uncharted x as some type of source puts that in bold underline.
Why dont you do the math stuff of the pyramid doing the 2015 survey that mark lehner did
I have hours on the math of the pyramids, I always use the J.H Cole survey. Closer to the time of the rubble around the base being removed, and it's in general agreement with later such as Dorner to within a few millimetres.
Lmao. These guys just cracked the pyramid case….. yeah right. The ignorance in these guys, it’s been known for many years now that it was done nicely on the outside and backfilled. Are you made it sound like this was a piece of cake.
I would like to see you build one half the size. I mean you said it was easy lmaooooo. There’s so much more to these pyramids then just the rubble backfill. The engineering the pinpoint accuracy of where it’s located, The damn near perfect cuts, The moving of these materials, no one can even come up with The reason why they were built or what they even are, but I bet you can tell us. And then when they had the flat surface of rocks and then it changed to big humps you said all they did here was just put the stone in and then cut them down flat like these, I would like to see you cut just one of them down, and since you know how they did it, use the Method they did and then tell us. I can’t wait to hear how it was done, Lol The ignorance.
You might want to look at the other videos i Have posted before you call anyone ignorant. You clearly are not aware of the experiments that have been done, and examples of traditional masons still working to this day.
When you do stumble out of your ignorance and look around outside of the lost high tech guys you'll be shocked by what the world has to offer.
Wait until you stumble on the precision polygonal granite lighthouses and so many other examples to which you are plainly ignorant.
Or when you stumble onto ancient lifting techniques and that they all emerge from ship rigging.
Get out of the lost high tech bubble and look around, there's so much out there, it's easy to find. I did.
Ignorance is curable but you have to look for answers rather than copy paste the same comments a million others post every day.
@@SacredGeometryDecoded This is no bubble and it’s no conspiracy theory, in the video they walk around like it was a piece of cake there’s more to it than that their whole argument basically was the rubble was thrown behind the outer casings In the outer casings would look good but it’s not even just about that scientist can’t even figure these things out
@@markpatrick9846 what scientists can’t figure what out? I hear vague shit like that all the time. I’d love to hear what these “scientists” can’t figure out.
Please educate me on the SCiENCE.
It’s going to be a tour guide talking about Chris Dunn I would bet?
Or Yousef Awyan keeper of ancient wisdom?
Ah........the old "impossibility" rationalization. How quaint. 🙄 If there are supposedly "near perfect" cuts as you say = why not on all the blocks??? After all those nicely done ones are a drop in the bucket compared to the total number of blocks which are nowhere near as perfect as you claim.
Also what supposed accuracy in location do you infer??? The siting of the Giza pyramids took place over several generations. Further Djedefre who followed his father Khufu on the throne did not build there. His own pyramid is further north of Giza. So if there was some "grand plan" apparently he did not get the word. lol! Meanwhile tombs were being built at Giza - hence cluttering the landscape - in the years between the 3 main pyramids being built. That means that when a royal pyramid was sited it had to accommodate existing quarries and cemeteries already in place - let alone available high ground which could accommodate a large structure.
Finally why were they built = the Egyptian religion of course - duh! To exist in the afterlife you needed your body to survive + people to remember you and make offerings. Thus they mummified their bodies and built tombs to protect them. They built temples and cults around themselves to be remembered. Further those tombs "stood out" so as to broadcast your power and glory as well as to please your Gods who responded by making Egypt strong and the harvest bountiful. See = answers after all. All that was required is to actually learn as opposed to simply asking questions absent any real desire to understand.
p.s. - there are evenly spaced post holes surrounding the foundations of Giza pyramids = literally hundreds of them. That shows how they meticulously surveyed their foundations using the Sun's shadow to ascertain the cardinal directions. See - no "advanced tech" needed. Merely time and patience - and a lot of posts and rope.
Everybody knows this, you act like this is a revelation. This is a no brainer, you can look right at it and see, duh!
What people want to know is how they carved that huge lotus pillor with the perfect top . Or how they carved those statues of ramseses that are so perfect. Or how about the huge polished boxs at the serapeum? Tell how this stone mason could do that with bronze tools! This guys acts like he descovered the way the parimads were built. This is all old news.
If everyone already knows then why are so many people upset and surprised by these facts. Not everyone knows, not even a majority of know. If everyone already knows then why are Lost HIgh Tech channels like Brien Foerster, Bright Insight, Uncharted X , Khemit School getting away with saying the opposite of reality.Talking about millions of precisely cut and laid blocks?
NO. Not everyone knows, Very few know. And the lost ancient high technology grifters are getting away with telling the exact opposite of reality.
" What people want to know is how they carved huge giant lotus pillar with perfect ops" How do you know it's perfect? Because the lost high tech people told you it was!! The same people who say the Saqqara Serapeum coffers are " PRECISION" Just look at a corinthian capital and a lotus looks like childs play.
Any skilled stone mason sculptor could do it ,
th-cam.com/video/xv70B0T3cUM/w-d-xo.html
They could do it with flint tools.
Question asked , question answered.
You are allowed to look at ancient history and stone masonry outside of the lost high technology crowd. I know you haven't because you are repeating the exact same talking points of someone who hasn't looked outside of that echo chamber.
You seriously think these exact same points haven't been brought up a 1000 times on my channel? A million times on other channels.
I know exactly what you are going to say before you do, I know exactly what you've looked into, and what you haven't looked into. You are part of an echo chamber/cult. It's up to you if you want to break free of that but the fact is it is a cult. Once you recognise that you'll see. TYhese lost ancient high tech people are grifter frauds. Especially Chris Dunn, the father of lost high tech. It's an incestuous group of cowards who haven't the balls to accept any challenge, they cite each other and so circle jerk podcasts.
It's an echo chamber. A giant snake oil ponzi scheme.
So this guy is saying the pyramids were built by the Egyptians😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂