Great call T-Pott! The Topps Mystery Refractors from regular Topps products in 1997 Football and 1995 Basketball (NOT the mystery refractors inserted in Topps Finest Basketball packs though) are incredibly rare and under appreciated. The 1995 basketball versions look the best IMO though they usually have print line issues...
@@mofomoco yes, it's pretty fun. I have a few"Sports Cards" videos on the "home" section of my TH-cam page that explains it. You can gain #1 for your fav players and get a pin from PSA.
I agree that Court Kings cards are very underrated. I’m actually 25 cards in on the 30 card 2019 Points in the Paint insert set in the Sapphire (SN’d to 25) parallel. Such a cool artistic looking set when all the cards are side by side
Hello maybe I’m old but for me to be fair to people I think that grading companies should be more lenient on printing flaws or cantering if is a common problem in certain brands or years. I have been in the hobby for over 35 years and some brands and years it’s just impossible to get a decent centred card in the entire print run. As long as corners, edges and no creases or stains, grading companies should take the rest into consideration. If it’s a set that a print line or off centering isn’t a common issue then yes dock the grade but if it is a known problem of the particular product then it should not affect the grade. Like seriously, if a tiny print line or a dot the size of a pen tip is going to make a difference on an otherwise perfect card, imo grading has went too far. Before grading if you had corners and edges that were sharp, no stains or creases and the centering didn’t cut off any of the card you got top dollar. Heck you had a valuable rarity if you had all the above but the centering was so bad it had part of another card with it. Now if you had that graded, it would not be a rare and unique card worth something, it would be considered as garbage. Idk grading is more of a headache than a great breakthrough in my mind. But I won’t get into it, but just think of all the negatives that have arisen in the hobby since grading started in comparison to before.
Cool cards you got there. I'd love to see a vintage submission. I know it seems all of the great vintage cards have been submitted, but who says I suggested topps? Find yourself a low pop oddball set or something.
percentage-wise, $2 or $3 per card is a lot if you are only paying $15 a card, like in a bulk sub...if you submitted 100 cards, $200 or $300 is a decent amount of money on top of grading costs -- cool cards in your sub
Guys yelling are so rude 😀 Court Kings is underrated, just like Spectra. Probably because hobby is so expensive for such few cards. I got a Giannis Aurora Gem I graded myself 😊 I’m surprised market movers wasn’t used much. Thanks T-Pott for sharing! Take care Brother!
Great call T-Pott! The Topps Mystery Refractors from regular Topps products in 1997 Football and 1995 Basketball (NOT the mystery refractors inserted in Topps Finest Basketball packs though) are incredibly rare and under appreciated. The 1995 basketball versions look the best IMO though they usually have print line issues...
POP1s are also extra nice when competing in the PSA set registry.
There is a competition for psa aet registry?
@@mofomoco yes, it's pretty fun. I have a few"Sports Cards" videos on the "home" section of my TH-cam page that explains it. You can gain #1 for your fav players and get a pin from PSA.
I agree that Court Kings cards are very underrated. I’m actually 25 cards in on the 30 card 2019 Points in the Paint insert set in the Sapphire (SN’d to 25) parallel. Such a cool artistic looking set when all the cards are side by side
Love the Barry Sanders cards. If you really like that shine, the 1997 Zenith Z-Team Gold Mirror Barry Sanders is a must have.
Hello maybe I’m old but for me to be fair to people I think that grading companies should be more lenient on printing flaws or cantering if is a common problem in certain brands or years. I have been in the hobby for over 35 years and some brands and years it’s just impossible to get a decent centred card in the entire print run. As long as corners, edges and no creases or stains, grading companies should take the rest into consideration. If it’s a set that a print line or off centering isn’t a common issue then yes dock the grade but if it is a known problem of the particular product then it should not affect the grade. Like seriously, if a tiny print line or a dot the size of a pen tip is going to make a difference on an otherwise perfect card, imo grading has went too far. Before grading if you had corners and edges that were sharp, no stains or creases and the centering didn’t cut off any of the card you got top dollar. Heck you had a valuable rarity if you had all the above but the centering was so bad it had part of another card with it. Now if you had that graded, it would not be a rare and unique card worth something, it would be considered as garbage. Idk grading is more of a headache than a great breakthrough in my mind. But I won’t get into it, but just think of all the negatives that have arisen in the hobby since grading started in comparison to before.
They do. Look at 1979 o pee chee hockey
With that Topps Finest Mystery, is there a way to determine the gold versus bronze when looking at an ungraded card? Some pics are not helpful.
Easiest way for 1997, Gold version player is in their Pro Bowl uniform
Cool cards you got there. I'd love to see a vintage submission. I know it seems all of the great vintage cards have been submitted, but who says I suggested topps? Find yourself a low pop oddball set or something.
90's cards 🚨🔥🔥🔥🚒
ill bin that barry gold refractor where can i reach you
percentage-wise, $2 or $3 per card is a lot if you are only paying $15 a card, like in a bulk sub...if you submitted 100 cards, $200 or $300 is a decent amount of money on top of grading costs -- cool cards in your sub
That Divisional Foes 4/5 is 🔥 something I'd grade without hesitation. ❤️ multiple star cards
Love that metal Barry Sanders card. Very cool
Love the Freeman/Harper Tpot!
Damn those Barry's are badass!
Wish psa would label cards like that barry sanders that have been "altered" like they used to with a "w/o film"
Guys yelling are so rude 😀 Court Kings is underrated, just like Spectra. Probably because hobby is so expensive for such few cards. I got a Giannis Aurora Gem I graded myself 😊 I’m surprised market movers wasn’t used much. Thanks T-Pott for sharing! Take care Brother!
Me: I'm not a fan of cards released after an athlete retires.
TPott: Turns over the Barry Sanders Surge
Me: 😯okay, there are exceptions
Pre-screening is stupid.
Ive had cards with issues gem and ive had cards that look flawless, get 9s 😂😂
Great video, thanks!
Good video, thanks!
Nice job!
Nice🔥
Did I just hear 2012 and "nice vintage look"? 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
Everything you do seems to go against what your boss should allow . You are pushing your cards on his channel now ?
5 min advertisement to start the video, really?
3:30 I think grading is subjective not science so if you listen to others prescreen you hurt yourself. You can’t gem cards you don’t send
cant even judge his own cards
what keeps gotbaseballcards from switching your cards out unless they are serial number? This hobby is shady place
no way you got a 10 on the capt america