There are things in Amazing Spider Man #178 that are definitely true. New York is real, the subway system is real, chemistry is verifiable, people speak the right language and make references to real historical events.. therefore it's RIDICULOUS to say that spider powers aren't real
I just have to imagine when people in the future, say 300 or 500 years from now "discover" those ancient documentations and if they will interpret them right ^^. And now I have to think about Galaxy Quest :P "By Grabthar's Hammer...."
You took the words right out of my mouth. I also love how he keeps telling Peterson he needs to do more research, but it sounds like he needs to do more research
"I'm actually so well-versed in the Bible. What's that guy's name, Cephas? Cephus? Chiphas? Cornelius? Centaur? Anyway, you should really refrain from speaking on this subject if you don't know what you're talking about."
Him: Back then people were more trustworthy and therefor the writings were more accurate. So we don’t need other supporting accounts. This is his standard of evidence for one the wildest claims in human history. He’s dismissed
He seems to have a sketchy grasp of history and apparently knows some of the Bible, but has no problem declaring it to be completely historically accurate and reliable. Amazing.
when I was in high school I could recite whole passages from Monty Python and the Holy Grail, I haven't seen the movie in years but I can still debate you on the text, you won't win
I don’t want to talk to you no more, you empty-headed animal food trough wiper. I fart in your general direction. Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries.
We know they said "We have no king but caeser" because in Jesus christ superstar they chant it and you cant argue that Jesus Christ superstar doesnt have some serious bops in it
As long as those four friends describe things like weather, river rapids, rocks and wild animals we can pretty safely assume they are telling the truth. But if they start describing castles floating on clouds? Flying unicorns? Talking snakes? That would require pretty substantial evidence to be accepted as truth. Way more than any religion can show to back up their claims.
The gospel writers should at least agree with each other if I'm to believe Saints rose from their graves to reenact michael jackson's thriller around downtown jerusalem.
If we give the same arguements for the iliad I don't think they'd agree that the city of troy existing proves the historical accuracy of the stories of Greek mythology.
@ 5:45 "I accept skepticism......."as long as it suites me and agrees with what I think...... he did not outright say that, but you sort of could hear it in his hesitation.
The argument about whether Paul was or was not a Christian was just a semantics argument between both people. It can depend on if you defined a Christian as a follower of Christ, in which case Paul would be a Christian; or if you only define a christian as when they started being called Christians by other people in the literature.
Captain America fought Hitler during WW2. Hitler existed and WW2 was a historical event that happened, Therefore, captain America is a historically accurate figure 🤦♂️
I think it’s less about becoming an atheist, and more about being honest about what the bible actually says He needs to be guided towards scholars like Bart Ehrman, Josh Bowen, Kipp Davies, James Tabor, Dale Allison, Dan Mclellan etc who read the original languages and can tell you about it without the apologetics If he reads those and is still a Christian, all the power to him, but he deserves a fighting chance
Actually there are Egyptian documents mentioning Hebrew artisans employed in pyramids-buildings and other projects, but nothing mentioning an army of slaves just getting up and leaving with a lot of special effects to boot.
Oh the pharaos had a VERY good countability though. Basically because the amount of food produced and consumed, the numbers and qualifications (hence the amount of food, clothes and jewelry per capita) of the egyptian working force and the military were vital to Egypt. About losses and failures... Let's just say Seti the first was not very nice toward his father and predecessor. Nor were the scribes. This desire to have at least a good countability is one of the reasons no matter how HARD and how LONG they tried to erase him, we are still aware of Akhenaton. So... Exodus ? Nope, even if just Egypt still existing to be taken by the Ptolemes is already enough to discard that episode of the Bible.
sources please: Israel or Hapiru are not mention till after the reign of Ramses II and at that time Egyptian stopped buildoing pyramids for centuries already.
I would even go as far as saying that the ONLY récollection of canaanite slaves we have is the mention of 10 000 prisonners of war waaaaay after the end of Ramses II... And, to put it bluntly, Cleopatra VII was closer to us that she was to the pyramid building era. And Ramses II is around the middle of the time that separates Cleopatra VII from the pyramids. Sooo... Does not bid well for hebrews building pyramids or even mastabas. BUT they might have been enslaved for ziggurats. There is just no ziggurat in Egypt, but who cares about errors of barely tens of hundreds of kilometers when it comes to geography ?
His Grand Canyon analogy doesn't work. The four people are on the trip together. Matt, Mark, Luke and John were written a wildly different times, decades apart
@33:40 the colour of Jesus robe PURPLE?????? that was about the most expensive die thoroughout the whole Mediterranean and only to be used by consuls or emperors. The narrow purple stripe on a white tunic was the distingtion mark of a Roman senator. If Jesus could permit himself a purple robe he must have been very very rich. I thing the purpleness is a topic much later added to the Jesus myth to put him on the same level as the ruling Roman class.
On the topic of Gospel contradictions they even get the resurrection mixed up. Did 1 person go, or 2 or 4? Was there guards or weren’t there? Was there 1 angel or 2? Was the tomb already opened or did they watch it open? Was there an earthquake or was it silent? Was an angel(s) already there or did the angel(s) arrive afterwards. Did the Mary and Mary spread the news immediately or did they remain silent. There’s a few more i don’t feel like typing out.
He seems to be merging together the Old and New Testaments together when he talks about their historical reliability; but they are very different, having emerged from different times and cultures and given that the Hebrew Bible describes events that are either mythological or happened hundreds of years before, while the New Testament was written much closer to the time it takes place. In any case, neither are historical texts in the modern sense, only historical sources.
Chop Suey! ----------------- Father, into your hands I commend my spirit Father, into your hands Why have you forsaken me? In your eyes forsaken me In your thoughts forsaken me In your heart forsaken me - System of a Down Great song :) ( CSvFpBOe8eY ) timestamp : #t=2m22s
He's so well versed in the Bible but, he first didn't know about the first verse Peterson brought up then he didn't know the verse he was bringing up. This dude's a joke. 😂😂😂😂
I got up to around an4 minutes in and just had to stop. The arrogance of the guy who thinks that he knows better than the scholars who have studied the topic their whole lives, just annoys me.
This guy keeps making false comparisons between historical battles and fucking magic... Also, when he does make these comparisons, he just says "all the eye witnesses" for his claims in the Bible, yet he can't name a single eye witness for any miracle claim in the book that he worships.
Yes, there are ways to test if the gospels are accurate. You read them, then you find all the MASSIVE contradictions and you come to the obvious conclusion that it's a massive pile of horseshit. It's not hard Christians.
There is a lot of irony going on here. Dude thinks he's a bible scholar; yet, is so very wrong about pretty much everything regarding what the Bible says. Clueless guest. If you don't know how to do actual research, learn!
The easy answer to the question is, "No." Firstly, the Bible isn't actually any one kind of book. It's a collection of a lot of different types of writing, only a small portion of which even purports to be an accounting of events. Even those sections are primarily aimed at recounting the faith-related aspects of those events. (Luke/Acts is the best example of history-with-an-agenda in that the writer specifically says, "These things are written so that you will believe that Jesus is the Christ..." So, does the Bible relate some actual events that actually happened? Yes. Sometimes it's difficult to verify which events actually occurred though, especially in the details. (We can confirm that Jesus, the Nazarian was put to death by crucifixion by the Romans around 33 CE, but we only have the gospel writers' word for it that the events took place as they described them. (There's no corroboration from non-Christian sources. That doesn't mean it's wrong. It simply means there's no way to verify the account.) Does the Bible relate the events in the way history ideally relates them (in a chronological order with only a small amount of interpretation)? Not at all and that's not really the intent of the writers anyway.
There are clear error ls in the septuagint. And funnily enough an argument that Jesus makes in one of the stories is based on an error in the translation made in the septuagint. That means that either jesus made this error or the writer of the story did. Either way it shows a lack of knowledge about what the Hebrew said.
Or the Septuagint (LXX) was, at that time, the version of the texts used. Hence when the various NT authors quote, they quote from the LXX, which gives the very infamous misunderstanding you allude to as hilariously explained in the opening of the film Snatched.
@@DoctorX101 yes, so the writer of the text used the septuagint and had no knowledge of what Jesus actually said (most probably because this story is fiction).
“I’m actually quite versed in the Bible and biblical scholars”. Had to ask which verse in John Peterson is quoting. So who’s the ignorant one here exactly?
Most of the stories in the bible are written many years after the supposed events. The longer that time the less likely is the accuracy. Add to that the fact that the Hebrew people had a tendency to pretend that "God" authorized their actions, and you have a series of tall tales all linked together by a common geography and little else. The Hebrews were never enslaved in Egypt, but Egypt occupied the land where the Hebrews lived, and they were ruled over by a Pharaoh... That IS history. Moses was a myth, as were Adam and Eve and Noah. I think much of Hebrew history is fiction. All the "good stuff" is.
Take this Jesus of Nazareth, the bodily evangelist of love, the "Saviour," who brought holiness and victory to the poor, to the sick, to the sinners. Was he not in fact seduction in its most terrible and irresistible form, the seduction and detour to exactly those Judaic values and new ideals? Didn't Israel in fact attain, with the detour of this "Saviour," with this apparent enemy to and dissolver of Israel, the final goal of its sublime thirst for vengeance? Isn't it part of the secret black art of a truly great politics of vengeance, a far-sighted, underground, slowly expropriating, and premeditated revenge, that Israel itself had to disown and nail to the cross the tool essential to its revenge before all the world, so that "all the world," that is, all Israel's enemies, could then swallow this bait? On the other hand, could anyone, using the full subtlety of his mind, imagine a more dangerous bait? Something to match the enticing, intoxicating, narcotizing, corrupting power of that symbol of the "holy cross," that ghastly paradox of a "god on the cross," that mystery of an unimaginable and ultimate cruelty and self-crucifixion of god for the salvation of mankind? . . . At least it is certain that sub hoc signo [under this sign] Israel, with its vengeance and revaluation of the worth of all other previous values, has triumphed again and again over all other ideals, over all nobler ideals. On the Genealogy of Morals A Polemical Tract by Friedrich Nietzsche
█▄░█ █▀█ █░▀█ █▄█ It is not, it's a collection of stories ripped off from older stories, which were made up by people who didn't know, so they guessed.
There are things in Amazing Spider Man #178 that are definitely true. New York is real, the subway system is real, chemistry is verifiable, people speak the right language and make references to real historical events.. therefore it's RIDICULOUS to say that spider powers aren't real
You're forgetting that Peter Parker is a photographer for a newspaper, both photographers and newspapers exist, so clearly it's all true
I just have to imagine when people in the future, say 300 or 500 years from now "discover" those ancient documentations and if they will interpret them right ^^. And now I have to think about Galaxy Quest :P "By Grabthar's Hammer...."
In a thousand years, All will know that the wall crawler is the one true god, Because new york exists.
for a guy who said he is very well versed in the bible, he sure says "I don't know" a lot!
and he says he is very well versed after not knowing about "We have no king but Ceasar" 😂😂😂
You took the words right out of my mouth. I also love how he keeps telling Peterson he needs to do more research, but it sounds like he needs to do more research
He also thinks that city Paul wrote to was called "Corinthia", and doesn't know what a centurion was.
I lost brain cells.
He'd be laughed at in any basic college level religious studies class.
Josephus wrote about Jesus like twice. And by "about" I mean mentioned a figure named Christ in passing. That's doing a LOT of heavy lifting.
And only that the christians believed a thing. Which we know without him.
@@pimpbisquick7036 yup, he doesn’t add a lot to the narrative.
"I'm actually so well-versed in the Bible. What's that guy's name, Cephas? Cephus? Chiphas? Cornelius? Centaur? Anyway, you should really refrain from speaking on this subject if you don't know what you're talking about."
Ah yes, a letter written to the people of Corinthia. Not Corinth, the city in Greece, but the mythical land of Corinthia.
…isn’t Corinthia just southwest of Narnia or am I not remembering things correctly?
I'm pleased others picked up on that. But yes, Corinthia borders Narnia to the south, and Elbonia to the northeast😆.
Him: Back then people were more trustworthy and therefor the writings were more accurate. So we don’t need other supporting accounts.
This is his standard of evidence for one the wildest claims in human history. He’s dismissed
You could record this and play it back to them, and they wouldn't see a problem.
Epistemology should be mandatory in schools.
He seems to have a sketchy grasp of history and apparently knows some of the Bible, but has no problem declaring it to be completely historically accurate and reliable. Amazing.
when I was in high school I could recite whole passages from Monty Python and the Holy Grail, I haven't seen the movie in years but I can still debate you on the text, you won't win
I don’t want to talk to you no more, you empty-headed animal food trough wiper. I fart in your general direction. Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries.
he’s just repeating what his mom is telling him, you can tell that’s why he needs stuff repeated and muted himself more than once
One minute he’s not familiar with “we have no king but Caesar” and the next minute his boasting about how “well versed” he is 😂😂😂
As a guy who is incredibly well versed in the Bible, I can say this guy is NOT well versed in the Bible 😅
I'm glad this kid was able to validify his researches
We know they said "We have no king but caeser" because in Jesus christ superstar they chant it and you cant argue that Jesus Christ superstar doesnt have some serious bops in it
As long as those four friends describe things like weather, river rapids, rocks and wild animals we can pretty safely assume they are telling the truth. But if they start describing castles floating on clouds? Flying unicorns? Talking snakes? That would require pretty substantial evidence to be accepted as truth. Way more than any religion can show to back up their claims.
The gospel writers should at least agree with each other if I'm to believe Saints rose from their graves to reenact michael jackson's thriller around downtown jerusalem.
If we give the same arguements for the iliad I don't think they'd agree that the city of troy existing proves the historical accuracy of the stories of Greek mythology.
This is the main thing I would like for people like the caller to understand.
@ 5:45
"I accept skepticism......."as long as it suites me and agrees with what I think......
he did not outright say that, but you sort of could hear it in his hesitation.
The argument about whether Paul was or was not a Christian was just a semantics argument between both people. It can depend on if you defined a Christian as a follower of Christ, in which case Paul would be a Christian; or if you only define a christian as when they started being called Christians by other people in the literature.
Captain America fought Hitler during WW2. Hitler existed and WW2 was a historical event that happened, Therefore, captain America is a historically accurate figure 🤦♂️
34:21 what a bummer to be one of the 3 guys that leave just before the pivotal moment in your religion.
the guy said that a civilization was discovered that was 11,000 years old i was raised in the church and was taught that the earth wasn’t that old
it is more or less an argument for: archeology had this or that wrong, so it could be wrong on biblical stuff, so my idea about it is right.
@@kamion53
'it could be'
That doesn't mean it is.
For someone who is well versed, i can hear someone in the backround helping him 😂
no way i have to listen back
It's his mother.
Even with the extra help he's still getting schooled on the Bible by an atheist, like most Christians...
I think this kid may one day become an atheist because of this conversation. Compared to others you've talked to, he seems to have a decent head.
not with his mom in the background
I think it’s less about becoming an atheist, and more about being honest about what the bible actually says
He needs to be guided towards scholars like Bart Ehrman, Josh Bowen, Kipp Davies, James Tabor, Dale Allison, Dan Mclellan etc who read the original languages and can tell you about it without the apologetics
If he reads those and is still a Christian, all the power to him, but he deserves a fighting chance
Actually there are Egyptian documents mentioning Hebrew artisans employed in pyramids-buildings and other projects, but nothing mentioning an army of slaves just getting up and leaving with a lot of special effects to boot.
Nothing official. Pharaoh's and Ceasars were not known to keep good records of their failures...🥴
Oh the pharaos had a VERY good countability though. Basically because the amount of food produced and consumed, the numbers and qualifications (hence the amount of food, clothes and jewelry per capita) of the egyptian working force and the military were vital to Egypt.
About losses and failures... Let's just say Seti the first was not very nice toward his father and predecessor. Nor were the scribes.
This desire to have at least a good countability is one of the reasons no matter how HARD and how LONG they tried to erase him, we are still aware of Akhenaton. So... Exodus ? Nope, even if just Egypt still existing to be taken by the Ptolemes is already enough to discard that episode of the Bible.
sources please: Israel or Hapiru are not mention till after the reign of Ramses II and at that time Egyptian stopped buildoing pyramids for centuries already.
I would even go as far as saying that the ONLY récollection of canaanite slaves we have is the mention of 10 000 prisonners of war waaaaay after the end of Ramses II... And, to put it bluntly, Cleopatra VII was closer to us that she was to the pyramid building era. And Ramses II is around the middle of the time that separates Cleopatra VII from the pyramids. Sooo... Does not bid well for hebrews building pyramids or even mastabas. BUT they might have been enslaved for ziggurats. There is just no ziggurat in Egypt, but who cares about errors of barely tens of hundreds of kilometers when it comes to geography ?
They'll use these false 'exodus' narratives to claim a right to settle in Egypt in the future. It's a Kleptoculture.
The Bible is historically accurate. You have never seen a talking bush or a talking serpent?
maybe you can see a talking serpent after smoking some burning bush
its a metaphor!🤪
@@UltraVioletKnight…a burning bush might require antibiotics. See a doctor!
Depends on the, er, "bush"?
His Grand Canyon analogy doesn't work. The four people are on the trip together. Matt, Mark, Luke and John were written a wildly different times, decades apart
Yup. With Mk later than 70 CE and Mt and Lk using him as a source.
…but what about John, Paul, George, and Ringo? Weren’t they on the Grand Canyon trip together?
@33:40
the colour of Jesus robe PURPLE??????
that was about the most expensive die thoroughout the whole Mediterranean and only to be used by consuls or emperors. The narrow purple stripe on a white tunic was the distingtion mark of a Roman senator.
If Jesus could permit himself a purple robe he must have been very very rich.
I thing the purpleness is a topic much later added to the Jesus myth to put him on the same level as the ruling Roman class.
The bible is just as good as a history book as a marvel comic is good at prescribing instructions for aviation 😭
Most of his Sources: Trust me, bro
On the topic of Gospel contradictions they even get the resurrection mixed up. Did 1 person go, or 2 or 4? Was there guards or weren’t there? Was there 1 angel or 2? Was the tomb already opened or did they watch it open? Was there an earthquake or was it silent? Was an angel(s) already there or did the angel(s) arrive afterwards. Did the Mary and Mary spread the news immediately or did they remain silent. There’s a few more i don’t feel like typing out.
Abe Lincoln was a Vampire Hunter
He seems to be merging together the Old and New Testaments together when he talks about their historical reliability; but they are very different, having emerged from different times and cultures and given that the Hebrew Bible describes events that are either mythological or happened hundreds of years before, while the New Testament was written much closer to the time it takes place. In any case, neither are historical texts in the modern sense, only historical sources.
He's just flailing.
Chop Suey!
-----------------
Father, into your hands I commend my spirit
Father, into your hands
Why have you forsaken me?
In your eyes forsaken me
In your thoughts forsaken me
In your heart forsaken me
- System of a Down
Great song :)
( CSvFpBOe8eY ) timestamp : #t=2m22s
Yes. Mr Tankian, and co, provide way more wisdom than the bible.
Good lord the Dunning Kruger Effect is strong with this kid.
He's so well versed in the Bible but, he first didn't know about the first verse Peterson brought up then he didn't know the verse he was bringing up. This dude's a joke. 😂😂😂😂
I got up to around an4 minutes in and just had to stop. The arrogance of the guy who thinks that he knows better than the scholars who have studied the topic their whole lives, just annoys me.
There are immortals who fight eachother across time on earth because there can be only one
Historically acurate locations/circumstances
This guy keeps making false comparisons between historical battles and fucking magic...
Also, when he does make these comparisons, he just says "all the eye witnesses" for his claims in the Bible, yet he can't name a single eye witness for any miracle claim in the book that he worships.
Yes, there are ways to test if the gospels are accurate. You read them, then you find all the MASSIVE contradictions and you come to the obvious conclusion that it's a massive pile of horseshit. It's not hard Christians.
We haven't fount it... YET. We haven't found a lot of it... is that evidence?
There is a lot of irony going on here. Dude thinks he's a bible scholar; yet, is so very wrong about pretty much everything regarding what the Bible says. Clueless guest. If you don't know how to do actual research, learn!
Isnt Caephus one of the high priests?
Your point about Paul's letters contradicting Acts is wrong. Acts wasn't written by Paul or someone who even met Paul.
2:55 yeah lol like all of them?
24:14 seee see decades....thats less then centuries
There are these people called Biblical scholars and historians . . . They write these things called books and you can learn about the Bible's history.
The easy answer to the question is, "No." Firstly, the Bible isn't actually any one kind of book. It's a collection of a lot of different types of writing, only a small portion of which even purports to be an accounting of events. Even those sections are primarily aimed at recounting the faith-related aspects of those events. (Luke/Acts is the best example of history-with-an-agenda in that the writer specifically says, "These things are written so that you will believe that Jesus is the Christ..."
So, does the Bible relate some actual events that actually happened? Yes. Sometimes it's difficult to verify which events actually occurred though, especially in the details. (We can confirm that Jesus, the Nazarian was put to death by crucifixion by the Romans around 33 CE, but we only have the gospel writers' word for it that the events took place as they described them. (There's no corroboration from non-Christian sources. That doesn't mean it's wrong. It simply means there's no way to verify the account.)
Does the Bible relate the events in the way history ideally relates them (in a chronological order with only a small amount of interpretation)? Not at all and that's not really the intent of the writers anyway.
System of a Down taught me more about the bible than this guy learned in all his "studies".
This guy claimed he knew the Bible and the history around soooo well. Yet seemed to not know much of anything when asked. Lol
14:32 claim claim claim
When defending the historicity of the Bible the last culture you wanna mention is the Assyrians. 😂
I'd feel a lot more sorry for him if he wasn't so painfully arrogant.
Paul did not write a book. He wrote letters.
To the people of Corinithia!
@@martin2289 and other places
@@martin2289 Yeah, lots of people have no knowledge of the ancient world outside of a Christian context.
Symbolocism..
😂😂😂😂😂😂
That was ridiculous
He's an expert but he made a mistake right before he said it?
lol this guy toke on The Deconstruction Zone and got owned, the host kept debunking everything he brought up.
There are clear error ls in the septuagint. And funnily enough an argument that Jesus makes in one of the stories is based on an error in the translation made in the septuagint. That means that either jesus made this error or the writer of the story did. Either way it shows a lack of knowledge about what the Hebrew said.
Or the Septuagint (LXX) was, at that time, the version of the texts used. Hence when the various NT authors quote, they quote from the LXX, which gives the very infamous misunderstanding you allude to as hilariously explained in the opening of the film Snatched.
@@DoctorX101 yes, so the writer of the text used the septuagint and had no knowledge of what Jesus actually said (most probably because this story is fiction).
@@leerass Particularly given that the sayings attributed to him were composed in the wrong language.
New york city is mentioned in spider man comics, and the Empire State Building as well.... spider man comics are historically accurate
Sure, don't scatter my illusion my favorite comic hero is not real.
Spiderman is real because NewYork is a real place🤗
“I’m actually quite versed in the Bible and biblical scholars”.
Had to ask which verse in John Peterson is quoting. So who’s the ignorant one here exactly?
I couldn't possibly listen to the end! That he says he has so much knowledge about the Bible, he fails miserably!
For a guy who is very well-versed in this sure doesn’t know much about it. It’s funny how these people just lie.
Is this Almando ( Chrisr Rightous) who is the caller?
He sounds a bit like him, accent and the same garbled ignoramica very selfconvinched.
Most of the stories in the bible are written many years after the supposed events. The longer that time the less likely is the accuracy. Add to that the fact that the Hebrew people had a tendency to pretend that "God" authorized their actions, and you have a series of tall tales all linked together by a common geography and little else. The Hebrews were never enslaved in Egypt, but Egypt occupied the land where the Hebrews lived, and they were ruled over by a Pharaoh... That IS history. Moses was a myth, as were Adam and Eve and Noah. I think much of Hebrew history is fiction. All the "good stuff" is.
Take this Jesus of Nazareth, the bodily evangelist of love, the "Saviour," who brought holiness and victory to the poor, to the sick, to the sinners. Was he not in fact seduction in its most terrible and irresistible form, the seduction and detour to exactly those Judaic values and new ideals? Didn't Israel in fact attain, with the detour of this "Saviour," with this apparent enemy to and dissolver of Israel, the final goal of its sublime thirst for vengeance? Isn't it part of the secret black art of a truly great politics of vengeance, a far-sighted, underground, slowly expropriating, and premeditated revenge, that Israel itself had to disown and nail to the cross the tool essential to its revenge before all the world, so that "all the world," that is, all Israel's enemies, could then swallow this bait?
On the other hand, could anyone, using the full subtlety of his mind, imagine a more dangerous bait? Something to match the enticing, intoxicating, narcotizing, corrupting power of that symbol of the "holy cross," that ghastly paradox of a "god on the cross," that mystery of an unimaginable and ultimate cruelty and self-crucifixion of god for the salvation of mankind? . . . At least it is certain that sub hoc signo [under this sign] Israel, with its vengeance and revaluation of the worth of all other previous values, has triumphed again and again over all other ideals, over all nobler ideals.
On the Genealogy of Morals
A Polemical Tract
by
Friedrich Nietzsche
Lmfao, I click on this video and it has 666 views. How fitting
Christianity is a weapon of Judaism/ Jesus was the Bait for the Gentiles/Pagans Without this your argument is weak
Listening to this I believe you are you verified Food
I like your videos but i HATE hearing people eat and drink and i keep landing on those videos. It just takes me out of the whole thing 😅
You need to ask these cooks to explain the book of enoch. They'll be stumped everytime
█▄░█ █▀█
█░▀█ █▄█
It is not, it's a collection of stories ripped off from older stories, which were made up by people who didn't know, so they guessed.
This is the 3rd youtube video today, where the host is drinking or eating in such a loud way, slobbering on the mic, it's so gross to listen to.
it was din din time