I have a feeling people respond differently to different types of training, and the most successful athletes are the ones who are in tune with what works for them.
My conclution from this is that there are a lot of very different strategies that can work. I also think that trying to follow the path of superatlethes can lead to overtraining and injuries for less fit people.
super athletes clearly have very individual responses to training modalities. would be very interesting to hear the comments of stephen seiler on this variability. since he is the scientist who originally described the 80/20 intensity approach based on initial research in norway, i wonder if he is willing to comment in one of your future videos. he seems very connected to the endurance training scene, especially in Norway. thank you for your wonderful and interesting videos. unfortunately, our 15 yo ski racing daughters really took to the "candy, junk food" video!
It seems like there are two methods: zone 5+ moderate intensity training or zone 3+ low intensity training- do you think it is necessary to push more on long session if you do a lot of zone 5 to be able to keep the Pace in distance
@@xcskiing_universe Thanks for the reply!I understand if you want to be anonymous. But I think it would give more credibility if we also know who you are. Otherwise it’s just some random person on the internet making up things and could also have hidden motives or connections to brands/companies. We don’t know that. :)
Hard to get from atheles talk, many of them dont have a ideia if is Hard or not. And many do too much Hard thinking os thrsehold. Definition is a problem. 2-3hours os not Hard if not interval sessions.
I have a feeling people respond differently to different types of training, and the most successful athletes are the ones who are in tune with what works for them.
I fully agree and additionally every athlete has different genetics, for example how many fast twitch ot slow twitch fibers etc.
I have a feeling you value Peter’s concept!
My conclution from this is that there are a lot of very different strategies that can work. I also think that trying to follow the path of superatlethes can lead to overtraining and injuries for less fit people.
super athletes clearly have very individual responses to training modalities. would be very interesting to hear the comments of stephen seiler on this variability. since he is the scientist who originally described the 80/20 intensity approach based on initial research in norway, i wonder if he is willing to comment in one of your future videos. he seems very connected to the endurance training scene, especially in Norway. thank you for your wonderful and interesting videos. unfortunately, our 15 yo ski racing daughters really took to the "candy, junk food" video!
Haha! Did they change their diet because of that video? 😅 a part 2 is coming soon btw
Interesting discussion. Thank you for putting this together. Who is the professor at 6:50?
Jostein Hallén. Professor at the Norwegian school of sports science
🔥
👍👍 now can you make this video but with female athletes?
It seems like there are two methods: zone 5+ moderate intensity training or zone 3+ low intensity training- do you think it is necessary to push more on long session if you do a lot of zone 5 to be able to keep the Pace in distance
What’s the name of the person(-s) behind this channel? What education do they have and profession?
@@brum293 it’s one person. I can reveal that I’m a guy from Norway, that’s it
@@xcskiing_universe Thanks for the reply!I understand if you want to be anonymous. But I think it would give more credibility if we also know who you are. Otherwise it’s just some random person on the internet making up things and could also have hidden motives or connections to brands/companies. We don’t know that. :)
@@brum293 I’m not sponsored by anyone
@@xcskiing_universe that surprises me a lot. I thought you were from the US)
Почему нельзя сделать субтитры на всех языках?
Большунов увидит, еще быстрее побежит. Опасаются
What's obvious is that you shoud make your sessions harder when you don't do a lot of work of low intensity and vice-versa.
Can you summarize it in English?
Just the core
There are a plethora of contrasting opinions within elite XC training philosophy for what is the best method of training.
Hard to get from atheles talk, many of them dont have a ideia if is Hard or not. And many do too much Hard thinking os thrsehold.
Definition is a problem. 2-3hours os not Hard if not interval sessions.