Extremely ajeeb to see some comments here even after 2 hours lectures. Still they dare to make tabdee on salafi scholars. May Allah cure their sickness in their heart and guide them to the salafiyyah.
@@Athariyyaa ameen, ameen. I want this video to be a preventive measure for those who might fall in to such violations. As for the people who have set their minds and chose to take this route; this video means nothing to them, they will just twist my words, and call me names. Unless Allah guides them.
13:00 There are some people in Salaffiyah who have gone towards ghulum (extremism) 1:16:07 Syed Qutb ---- Another good short video on this topic: th-cam.com/video/SSis6MWxAFg/w-d-xo.htmlsi=-THMqKDWQPLUAzD7 -- If someone makes a statement, what parameters do we judge it by? The Quran and Sunnah We see if it coincides with the Quran and Sunnah 1:49:00 Uthman Ibn Farooq? -Bad approach to dawah -Sitting with Ali Dawah -May Allah guide us all -Praised some takfiris 1:49:49 Muslim Lantern? 1:49:57 Ali Dawah -Sits with anyone -Cooperates with anyone -He justifies sitting with inappropriately dressed women 1:52:14 Who do you recommend we watch in English? -It’s a circus out there -Allah Muste3an 1:52:33 Abdul Aziz Haqqan (Garden of Ilm) 1:52:42 One way to Paradise 1:52:50 Saajid Lipham (Ilm Institute) 1:53:57 Omar Suleiman - no 1:54:30 Zad Academy 1:54:38 Assim Al Hakeem - no 1:55:02 How to differentiate between Hanafis? 1:56:49 Uthman Bin Farooq 1:57:42 Ustadh Muhammad James Sutton (at Ilm Institute) *Ustadh Faris, Muhammad James Sutton and Saajid are close. You should ask Saajid to introduce you guys to each other iA 2:01:00 Who decides who is a salafi? Allah decides
how beneficial is this. May Allah bless ustaadh faris hamad. Allahumma baarik lahu. Extremely beneficial. Tabdee makers in social media must listen to this lecture. Its very crystal clear.
JazakAllah khair! Shaikh clarified so many things. Looking forward to learn more from you Shaikh. May Allah keep you steadfast and grant you strength to not fear the blame of the blamers.
اسلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته أخي الكريم. Baraak Allah oe fik ustadh. Can you name a few channels who have these ghulo in refutation so we can avoid. If possible in sha Allah. Zjazaak Allah gijran.
Brother this was the reason for the fitna which began when Sh Muhammad Ibn Hadi called them Saafiqah and spoke badly about them - perhaps too harsh and inappropriate. It was because they began these same issues you mentioned
@@SanadAbdulla-k9n From what I know thats not how it began though. I have a voice note of the (public) conversation between Shaykh Ibn Hadi and Shaykh Rabi, it started when they lied about shaykh Ibn Hadi in that conversation (and you can hear what he was saying vs what they were saying). Allahu Allam, better not slander any of them or spread any fitnah. And better stay away from it
@ exactly they make up things and accusations against people and warn against people then blame them when they defend themselves. They accused MBH for calling to working with Hizbis and Qutbis which he clearly denied
@@dejvimuca3466 maybe you didnt see the part where I talked about this. When we differ on a person, but our manhaj is correct. Doesnt mean we must desert the person.
@@Farishammadi i saw that very well faris and what you are saying is clear watering down the deen.Al halabi was considered an inovayors by the scholars and whoever doesnt tebdi someone who the scholars have made tebdi upon is an innovator.Sheikh al fawzans words not mine.Look it up
i think the Ummah need the like of them, i think it is not wise to turn the youth against them. they hold a very strong position in the the ummah, woe to this Ummah, if people stop doing jarh and taadeel upon haqq and manhaj of the salaf, there's no doubt that no one is more firm upon it in the west than them. it is from the blessing we have them and ustadh faris ustadh abdul aziz al haqqan. in the time of uthaymeen, ibn baz, al Albani,(correct me if i am wrong) they found it best to not speak about the like of sayid qutub hoping the issue will be forgotten and wont be big. but his fitnah spread and became big, wasnt it the ijtihad of the like sheikh rabee and did what they deemed to be correct for the Ummah, the manhaj of the ikhwani would have spread far greater. indeed didnt people critisze them for that, didnt some people oppose their ijtihad. but Alhamdoulilah now we know it was the right thing to do. sometimes clarity is indeed better. maybe we can learn something from the sahaba. during the fitnah both parties made their ijtihad and stood for what they deemed to best for the Ummah. we see this kind of division happening many times throughout the history of islam and again is a matter of ijtihad. it is from the means through which Allah test us.
*_Salaf is not a sect. In Islam, the orthodox and pure way is to call to the worship of Allah alone, not to one's group, political affiliation, or to one's Masjid. This orthodox call to the way of Salaf (ancestry; following the first three early Muslim generations) is a methodology, not a specific group with a badge, label, membership, or stamp of approval. Salaf is a methodology, not an elite group._*
ja sheikh i thing we forget to recognize that this a matter of ijtihad and i think is wrong to call them hizb or the like of it for their ijtihad, for a matter that they deemed to be most beneficial for the ummah, for exmpl.. the situation of ibn Hadi. i dont think is backward for them to seek clearance on the matter, cause now days everything is public, something that is already public cannot be hidden from the students, sooner or Later they will come to find out. i dont think is backward, cause ya sheikh many who receive guidance and turn toward salafiyah end up becoming hizb, because of some of these subahat they come across. i also can understand the wisdom on the other side. so therefore ya ikhwa this is a matter of ijtihad. as much as you don't agree with their method like andrew tate, that those not mean they are wrong, that those dont mean they are a hizb, what do we do of the saying of many of the scholars about them. they have the right to be against the ijtihad of some of the scholars and critisize them for it, i dont see them calling them hizb or mubtadee for their stance.
There is a famous Sheikh on youtube that says that as a layman if you take knowledge from him, you have to trust him on everything he says until the day of judgement... and it's his own responsability and he takes the guilt if he said something wrong... whoever knows him knows who I'm talking about. As if we shouldn't seek knowledge too
Students of Darul Tas-heh in New Cairo, Markaz As Syaikh Abu Abdil'ala Khalid Al Mishri حفظه الله th-cam.com/video/2m39sARBiEM/w-d-xo.htmlfeature=shared الشيخ سليمان الرحيلي مع الشيخ خالد عبد الأعلى المصري حفظهما الله th-cam.com/users/shortsRva8lo_EepI?feature=shared حفظ الله علماء أهل السنة والجماعة في كل مكان
Ustaadh, with all due respect, you refuted Ustaadh Abu taymiyyah’s 5 hour for the very same points you used in this video to refute the ghulaat, the same ibn Taymiyyah quotes he quoted, so it makes me wonder, is this only happening after brothers get stung?
Thats not true akhi. Abu Taymiyyah threw salafis under the bus, not just hizbis, and it made his ahl bidah friends very happy. Also he justified clear cut transgressions that he did. Here ustadh is talking about extremism/ghulu of certain salafis, and we all know this hizbiyyah exists
Most of that 5 hour video can be summed up in Ali's (May Allah be pleased with him) words كَلِمَةُ حَقٍّ أُرِيدَ بِهَا بَاطِلٌ A word of truth by which is intended falsehood. Plus, calling out Muslim rulers publicly is not a subsidiary matter. Its a fundamental issue. Using scholars pictures to justify one's wrongdoing is blameworthy and Shaikh Faris cleared this matter in this video. There's a difference between a person who violates something of the Deen by mistake and it happens like once or twice and between that person who justifies his wrongdoing. Allah knows best
@Pathofsalafalsalih He is refuted for his extreme irja by shaykh saleh aalshaykh. He said no rulers establish tauheed today even the rulers in khaleej. He said something like, if a ruler does zina in live television for half an hour, don't speak. Lol, this man can't give a better example. And many more refutations by salafi ulemas. Some say he made tauba from all his irja, wallahualam. It's good he made tauba, but no need to raise him to a level that does not fit him. There are mashaykhs who are purely salafi to take from.
@@riyasin I didn’t even see the rest of your comment Shaykh ibn Uthaymin رحمه الله preceded Shaykh Abdul aziz ar rayyis in that statement about the ruler and it had no time length on it don’t exaggerate be just it has nothing to do with irjaa, irjaa linguistically means to delay. What is being delayed inkar on the ruler ? You warn against the wrongdoing but don’t put a name or direct it towards the ruler this is what the ulama say the doubts of the khawarij have reached you, this is exactly what they used against the shaykh. Yes, he had other mistakes one you named isn’t one and I think he still retracted. And he was praised by more then 5 shuyookh after that time in detail , your exactly what Ustadh Farris is speaking about, you don’t except retraction?
@@riyasinso according to you who is a jahil shaykh Al rayis is not a pure salafi? 🤣. Go look at his efforts and refutations he has done on innovators before you speak
Extremely ajeeb to see some comments here even after 2 hours lectures. Still they dare to make tabdee on salafi scholars. May Allah cure their sickness in their heart and guide them to the salafiyyah.
@@Athariyyaa ameen, ameen. I want this video to be a preventive measure for those who might fall in to such violations. As for the people who have set their minds and chose to take this route; this video means nothing to them, they will just twist my words, and call me names.
Unless Allah guides them.
May Allah protect the brother at Spubs. The scholars have praised them.
Ameen!
May الله guide them and us
13:00 There are some people in Salaffiyah who have gone towards ghulum (extremism)
1:16:07 Syed Qutb
----
Another good short video on this topic:
th-cam.com/video/SSis6MWxAFg/w-d-xo.htmlsi=-THMqKDWQPLUAzD7
--
If someone makes a statement, what parameters do we judge it by?
The Quran and Sunnah
We see if it coincides with the Quran and Sunnah
1:49:00 Uthman Ibn Farooq?
-Bad approach to dawah
-Sitting with Ali Dawah
-May Allah guide us all
-Praised some takfiris
1:49:49 Muslim Lantern?
1:49:57 Ali Dawah
-Sits with anyone
-Cooperates with anyone
-He justifies sitting with inappropriately dressed women
1:52:14 Who do you recommend we watch in English?
-It’s a circus out there
-Allah Muste3an
1:52:33 Abdul Aziz Haqqan (Garden of Ilm)
1:52:42 One way to Paradise
1:52:50 Saajid Lipham (Ilm Institute)
1:53:57 Omar Suleiman - no
1:54:30 Zad Academy
1:54:38 Assim Al Hakeem - no
1:55:02 How to differentiate between Hanafis?
1:56:49 Uthman Bin Farooq
1:57:42 Ustadh Muhammad James Sutton (at Ilm Institute)
*Ustadh Faris, Muhammad James Sutton and Saajid are close. You should ask Saajid to introduce you guys to each other iA
2:01:00 Who decides who is a salafi?
Allah decides
Muhammad James Sutton? The same guy who quotes Yahya al Hajoori al Hadadi?
Is zad academy bad?
No it's good ignore this extremist@@mohammadshahil9519
God bless u, Shaikh. I ask Allah to grant u success and bless u with beneficial knowledge
Jazak Allah khair shaykh faris.
how beneficial is this. May Allah bless ustaadh faris hamad. Allahumma baarik lahu. Extremely beneficial. Tabdee makers in social media must listen to this lecture. Its very crystal clear.
JazakAllah khair! Shaikh clarified so many things. Looking forward to learn more from you Shaikh. May Allah keep you steadfast and grant you strength to not fear the blame of the blamers.
جزاك الله خيرا
looking forward to understanding the correct manhaj 🙂
JazaakAllaahu khayran for th clarification ustadh
اسلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته أخي الكريم. Baraak Allah oe fik ustadh. Can you name a few channels who have these ghulo in refutation so we can avoid. If possible in sha Allah. Zjazaak Allah gijran.
Most of the ones I came across were these short-clip channels that make refutation videos.
Clear and beneficial
جزاكم الله خيرا وبارك الله فيكم
Barak Allahu Feekum . Great Reminder indeed . May this lesson brings about goodness Ameen
Brother this was the reason for the fitna which began when Sh Muhammad Ibn Hadi called them Saafiqah and spoke badly about them - perhaps too harsh and inappropriate. It was because they began these same issues you mentioned
@@SanadAbdulla-k9n From what I know thats not how it began though. I have a voice note of the (public) conversation between Shaykh Ibn Hadi and Shaykh Rabi, it started when they lied about shaykh Ibn Hadi in that conversation (and you can hear what he was saying vs what they were saying). Allahu Allam, better not slander any of them or spread any fitnah. And better stay away from it
@ exactly they make up things and accusations against people and warn against people then blame them when they defend themselves. They accused MBH for calling to working with Hizbis and Qutbis which he clearly denied
Can you disable advertisement
I'm not even 20 minutes in and I've already gotten 4 ads
You’ve been refuted unfortunately I cannot listen to you anymore 💔💔😂may Allah preserve u and protect us from this plague
You have been deceived by shaytan
@ it’s a joke…may Allah guide us
Clear and to the point. This is very much needed, many brothers newly upon Islam are very confused due to this issue and warning against other salafis
May Allah bless you ustadh
JazakumAllahu khairan wa BaarakAllahu feekum.
جزاك الله خيرا
I've been listening to Khalid Green's classes for many years, Abu Musab for much longer. I think they're both beneficial in English.
Khalid green follows inovators like al halabi.Stay away from him.
@@dejvimuca3466are u sure he still follows him to this day?
We judge by what's apparent@@SalafiOnyx
@@dejvimuca3466 maybe you didnt see the part where I talked about this. When we differ on a person, but our manhaj is correct. Doesnt mean we must desert the person.
@@Farishammadi i saw that very well faris and what you are saying is clear watering down the deen.Al halabi was considered an inovayors by the scholars and whoever doesnt tebdi someone who the scholars have made tebdi upon is an innovator.Sheikh al fawzans words not mine.Look it up
i think the Ummah need the like of them, i think it is not wise to turn the youth against them. they hold a very strong position in the the ummah, woe to this Ummah, if people stop doing jarh and taadeel upon haqq and manhaj of the salaf, there's no doubt that no one is more firm upon it in the west than them. it is from the blessing we have them and ustadh faris ustadh abdul aziz al haqqan. in the time of uthaymeen, ibn baz, al Albani,(correct me if i am wrong) they found it best to not speak about the like of sayid qutub hoping the issue will be forgotten and wont be big. but his fitnah spread and became big, wasnt it the ijtihad of the like sheikh rabee and did what they deemed to be correct for the Ummah, the manhaj of the ikhwani would have spread far greater. indeed didnt people critisze them for that, didnt some people oppose their ijtihad. but Alhamdoulilah now we know it was the right thing to do. sometimes clarity is indeed better. maybe we can learn something from the sahaba. during the fitnah both parties made their ijtihad and stood for what they deemed to best for the Ummah. we see this kind of division happening many times throughout the history of islam and again is a matter of ijtihad. it is from the means through which Allah test us.
wa alaikum asalam wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuh
The modern Salafi movement has been splitting up since it began. Groups within groups
*_Salaf is not a sect. In Islam, the orthodox and pure way is to call to the worship of Allah alone, not to one's group, political affiliation, or to one's Masjid. This orthodox call to the way of Salaf (ancestry; following the first three early Muslim generations) is a methodology, not a specific group with a badge, label, membership, or stamp of approval. Salaf is a methodology, not an elite group._*
It could be very good with time stamps ya Ustadh :)
ja sheikh i thing we forget to recognize that this a matter of ijtihad and i think is wrong to call them hizb or the like of it for their ijtihad, for a matter that they deemed to be most beneficial for the ummah, for exmpl.. the situation of ibn Hadi. i dont think is backward for them to seek clearance on the matter, cause now days everything is public, something that is already public cannot be hidden from the students, sooner or Later they will come to find out. i dont think is backward, cause ya sheikh many who receive guidance and turn toward salafiyah end up becoming hizb, because of some of these subahat they come across. i also can understand the wisdom on the other side. so therefore ya ikhwa this is a matter of ijtihad. as much as you don't agree with their method like andrew tate, that those not mean they are wrong, that those dont mean they are a hizb, what do we do of the saying of many of the scholars about them. they have the right to be against the ijtihad of some of the scholars and critisize them for it, i dont see them calling them hizb or mubtadee for their stance.
There is a famous Sheikh on youtube that says that as a layman if you take knowledge from him, you have to trust him on everything he says until the day of judgement... and it's his own responsability and he takes the guilt if he said something wrong... whoever knows him knows who I'm talking about.
As if we shouldn't seek knowledge too
@@mirko5673 wrong concept
I know who you're talking about and you have lied and this is not what he meant
جزاكم الله خيرا
Can you take this matter to shaykh khalid ad dhafiri who is in your land? Be very interested to get his view on this before you get ‘refuted’
We are the Party of Allah
Please send this video to Spubs.
Students of Darul Tas-heh in New Cairo, Markaz As Syaikh Abu Abdil'ala Khalid Al Mishri حفظه الله
th-cam.com/video/2m39sARBiEM/w-d-xo.htmlfeature=shared
الشيخ سليمان الرحيلي مع الشيخ خالد عبد الأعلى المصري حفظهما الله
th-cam.com/users/shortsRva8lo_EepI?feature=shared
حفظ الله علماء أهل السنة والجماعة في كل مكان
I read the book of Shk Khalid about these extremists.
39:58 very very important.
Another good short video on this topic:
th-cam.com/video/SSis6MWxAFg/w-d-xo.htmlsi=-THMqKDWQPLUAzD7
Ustaadh, with all due respect, you refuted Ustaadh Abu taymiyyah’s 5 hour for the very same points you used in this video to refute the ghulaat, the same ibn Taymiyyah quotes he quoted, so it makes me wonder, is this only happening after brothers get stung?
Thats not true akhi. Abu Taymiyyah threw salafis under the bus, not just hizbis, and it made his ahl bidah friends very happy. Also he justified clear cut transgressions that he did.
Here ustadh is talking about extremism/ghulu of certain salafis, and we all know this hizbiyyah exists
And these hizbis have been warned against by the major scholars of Kuwait and Saudi that we know, trust me. Even those that praised them in the past
That's true, a lot of innovators used that 5hr video against salafis@@SalafiOnyx
36:14
Most of that 5 hour video can be summed up in Ali's (May Allah be pleased with him) words
كَلِمَةُ حَقٍّ أُرِيدَ بِهَا بَاطِلٌ
A word of truth by which is intended falsehood.
Plus, calling out Muslim rulers publicly is not a subsidiary matter. Its a fundamental issue. Using scholars pictures to justify one's wrongdoing is blameworthy and Shaikh Faris cleared this matter in this video. There's a difference between a person who violates something of the Deen by mistake and it happens like once or twice and between that person who justifies his wrongdoing. Allah knows best
01:43:46
1:27:21 😮
42:51
😂😂😂 1:07:14
Is abdul aziz arrayees a salafi?
Shaykh Abdul aziz ar rayyis حفظه الله ? Who is a known shaykh praised by many of the ulama including shaykh fawzan in detail
@Pathofsalafalsalih
He is refuted for his extreme irja by shaykh saleh aalshaykh.
He said no rulers establish tauheed today even the rulers in khaleej.
He said something like, if a ruler does zina in live television for half an hour, don't speak. Lol, this man can't give a better example.
And many more refutations by salafi ulemas.
Some say he made tauba from all his irja, wallahualam. It's good he made tauba, but no need to raise him to a level that does not fit him. There are mashaykhs who are purely salafi to take from.
@@riyasin I didn’t even see the rest of your comment Shaykh ibn Uthaymin رحمه الله preceded Shaykh Abdul aziz ar rayyis in that statement about the ruler and it had no time length on it don’t exaggerate be just it has nothing to do with irjaa, irjaa linguistically means to delay. What is being delayed inkar on the ruler ? You warn against the wrongdoing but don’t put a name or direct it towards the ruler this is what the ulama say the doubts of the khawarij have reached you, this is exactly what they used against the shaykh. Yes, he had other mistakes one you named isn’t one and I think he still retracted. And he was praised by more then 5 shuyookh after that time in detail , your exactly what Ustadh Farris is speaking about, you don’t except retraction?
Accept *
@@riyasinso according to you who is a jahil shaykh Al rayis is not a pure salafi? 🤣. Go look at his efforts and refutations he has done on innovators before you speak
52:28