I get it. I'm also struggling with being nervous in front of the mic. I hope that practice gets me to a better place in terms of speaking in my videos. Keep it up, your content is good!
Hi, Sam Haynes this app is sport session planner. If you see my newest videos, I now use TacticalPad for my videos. Both are good but I would say that I like TacticalPad more. The good thing about SportSeasionPlanner though, is that you can also use it for Futsal. On TacticalPad, you would have to but the software separately to use the Futsal option. I hope that helps. Thanks for your support!
Because you have 3 forward, it’s a great option to open the game up, after recovering the ball, this would spread the defenders, then try to get a ball back to the center, as you would have two possible options going forward. It’s important to take advantage of the three attacking players. That’s just on thought. It also depends on where the ball is, who recovers the ball, where the defenders are, and what type of players are on the team. Hope that helps. Thanks for your support.
I would play 3 CBs, in a defend only system. The only time the CBs would leave their shape is if they are on the ball or if they know 100% they can get to the ball.
100% Agree. I use the formation with a diamond in the midfield. The weak side midfielder drops in to support the 6 and cut off options to play the ball wide. The weak side 7 or 11 drops in as well. Not allowing the wide space to be easily exploited with a direct option. Offensively, we create many more options going forward and my back three actually find it easier to play out of the back.
You know, I do not have enough data to be able to give you factual response but based on the positions and actions of the the players in this formation, I would say it doesnt produce any more that any other formation that have three forwards. If you are looking for corner kicks then you need to play with a formation that is focused on sending crosses like the 4-4-2 flat or the 4-2-3-1 or if you want to play with three in the back then the 5-3-2/3-5-2. I hope this somewhat gives you what you were looking for. Thank you for your engagement in my channel. Thank you! Coach Luis Laureano La Vida Fútbol
Hi and thank you for your question. Yes, you have attacking wingers which make up the outside left and right on top [3-4-(3)], and behind the those players you have outside midfielders or left and right midfielders in the middle [3-(4)-3]. I hope this answers your questions. If you have any more questions or need clarification, please do not hesitate to ask. Thank you for your support! Coach Luis Laureano La Vida Fútbol
Yes, this formation would be good against most all variations of the 442. The three forwards make it difficult for the fullbacks to be part of the attack. That makes it difficult for the formation to sustain an aggressive attack when they constantly have to deal with a possible attack on both the wings and the center of the pitch. The middle would be even as both have four players and then the defense have a 3v2 numerical advantage so this formation does seem to be a good fit against the 442 wide or like I mentioned, most all variations but you need to have players to fulfill their roles to be able to take advantage of those advantages. Thank you for your support and your question. Coach Luis Laureano La Vida Fútbol
Yeah that’s okay. I believe there are many different ways to play with a particular formation. Key details get modified because of the players available. I’m curious to know what your team does with this formation? Thanks for your comment. I hope I can help in any way shape or form.
The focus is not to split the center backs but more so to be versatile. The more options you can create the more difficult it becomes for the opponents to adjust. The center backs should not remain separated, they obviously need to return during the defensive phase unless one of the midfielders drops back to cover momentarily.
Just watch the conte system break down of the 343. Overloading often using the outside cbs, the cm often drop and tucks in. Or draws multiple players in a fight space, drops the ball to the cb, who plays it wide and you transition forward quickly. The cb in his system, sits, where as a team like Atalanta, the cb of the 3 steps forward often. Just all comes down to how you want to play it
![ช้างศึกสู้ต่อไป!! พาเปียโน ดูบอลไทยครั้งแรก ตกรอบแบบโคตรเสียดาย!! l [Nickynachat]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/4WloIH645Lg/mqdefault.jpg)
I get it. I'm also struggling with being nervous in front of the mic. I hope that practice gets me to a better place in terms of speaking in my videos. Keep it up, your content is good!
Great, thanks for your support!
‘Essentially’ it’s good!
I'm understanding about football tactics thank you
This definitely helped me with my formations!
Awesome! I'm glad I could help out!
What app or software is that?
Btw love the vid
Hi, Sam Haynes this app is sport session planner. If you see my newest videos, I now use TacticalPad for my videos. Both are good but I would say that I like TacticalPad more. The good thing about SportSeasionPlanner though, is that you can also use it for Futsal. On TacticalPad, you would have to but the software separately to use the Futsal option. I hope that helps. Thanks for your support!
@@LaVidaFutbol are they on the app store
Sam Haynes TacticalPad Yes and SSP is not. SSP is all online so all your files get saved on their cloud.
What’s the best counter for this formation
Because you have 3 forward, it’s a great option to open the game up, after recovering the ball, this would spread the defenders, then try to get a ball back to the center, as you would have two possible options going forward. It’s important to take advantage of the three attacking players. That’s just on thought. It also depends on where the ball is, who recovers the ball, where the defenders are, and what type of players are on the team. Hope that helps. Thanks for your support.
I would play 3 CBs, in a defend only system. The only time the CBs would leave their shape is if they are on the ball or if they know 100% they can get to the ball.
100% Agree. I use the formation with a diamond in the midfield. The weak side midfielder drops in to support the 6 and cut off options to play the ball wide. The weak side 7 or 11 drops in as well. Not allowing the wide space to be easily exploited with a direct option.
Offensively, we create many more options going forward and my back three actually find it easier to play out of the back.
Does this formation usually produce more corners in a game bro ?
You know, I do not have enough data to be able to give you factual response but based on the positions and actions of the the players in this formation, I would say it doesnt produce any more that any other formation that have three forwards.
If you are looking for corner kicks then you need to play with a formation that is focused on sending crosses like the 4-4-2 flat or the 4-2-3-1 or if you want to play with three in the back then the 5-3-2/3-5-2.
I hope this somewhat gives you what you were looking for. Thank you for your engagement in my channel.
Thank you!
Coach Luis Laureano
La Vida Fútbol
Are there wingers in this formation?
Hi and thank you for your question. Yes, you have attacking wingers which make up the outside left and right on top [3-4-(3)], and behind the those players you have outside midfielders or left and right midfielders in the middle [3-(4)-3]. I hope this answers your questions. If you have any more questions or need clarification, please do not hesitate to ask.
Thank you for your support!
Coach Luis Laureano
La Vida Fútbol
Is this formation good against a 4 4 2 wide formation.
Yes, this formation would be good against most all variations of the 442. The three forwards make it difficult for the fullbacks to be part of the attack. That makes it difficult for the formation to sustain an aggressive attack when they constantly have to deal with a possible attack on both the wings and the center of the pitch.
The middle would be even as both have four players and then the defense have a 3v2 numerical advantage so this formation does seem to be a good fit against the 442 wide or like I mentioned, most all variations but you need to have players to fulfill their roles to be able to take advantage of those advantages.
Thank you for your support and your question.
Coach Luis Laureano
La Vida Fútbol
I play a CB my team plays with 3-4-3 with a CDM
Um, that's not how we do it.
Yeah that’s okay. I believe there are many different ways to play with a particular formation. Key details get modified because of the players available. I’m curious to know what your team does with this formation? Thanks for your comment. I hope I can help in any way shape or form.
What do you mean? There's plenty of other ways to show it.
This man was showing us just one way.
Tactics are off for the system
Thanks for your message. I more than happy to read your opinion on the video and on the system.
I would have to agree.
You have no idea what your on about,you do not split your centre backs
The focus is not to split the center backs but more so to be versatile. The more options you can create the more difficult it becomes for the opponents to adjust. The center backs should not remain separated, they obviously need to return during the defensive phase unless one of the midfielders drops back to cover momentarily.
Just watch the conte system break down of the 343. Overloading often using the outside cbs, the cm often drop and tucks in. Or draws multiple players in a fight space, drops the ball to the cb, who plays it wide and you transition forward quickly. The cb in his system, sits, where as a team like Atalanta, the cb of the 3 steps forward often. Just all comes down to how you want to play it
Who doesn't? Depending on what players you have,who rotates in, and what you are trying to accomplish, you can do whatever you want.
In FM it called wide centerback. It's a wide Libero basically. It depends on what player you have. Modern football opened for modern interpretation.