"Dont sleep on this commander" This will go perfectly in my Mathis deck. Its a mass boardwipe/mass revival deck where i basically wipe the board then we all bring back creatures (its kinda a hug deck too we all bring creatures back). Im literally drooling over this card.
It’s kinda just the aggressive direction commander is going. I didn’t mind Prosper cause it was super creative (albeit VERY strong), though it has gotten repetitive.
@@dapperghastmeowregard It has been pretty standardized. I actually think that Wizards is partially worried that new commanders won’t be as powerful as the treasure ones. Has power creep gone too far?
This commander definitely has a lot of potential, but I can see it still being overlooked or being one that people find annoying to play against. The reasons being that it’s either yet another Aristocrats commander, or people get super annoyed by it going in the direction of a bunch of board wipes. Now if there were more payoffs for having a bunch of Treasures (outside of massive spells or storming off), then yeah, it’d be neat, but as it stands, this is a commander that either falls into an already filled theme or into an annoying slot where you board wipe a lot.
What?!?! This is such a strong card. You can easily make at least 2 treasure tokens a turn with that. Moreover, it is expodential value. The first time you make treasure tokens will give you more mana for the next turn. With this mana you will be able to have more creatures die, so you will make more tokens and so on.. I am not kidding that this card can let you have you like 20 mana on turn 6 if goes unchecked I would also build this commander much different. I would focus havily on aristocrat strategy which let you killing creatures much easier than removals. Than i will use the mana to enhance the board state only growing my engine. The treasures are the cherry on top, letting you recover easily from board wipes and also maybe playing a few huge creatures
I've been wanting to make a Devil tribe deck for some time. I have most of the pieces for it but I kept switching between mono-red and black-red, even thought about Jund devils with the new 3 color commanders. This card is really tempting but I already have a black-red Minotaur tribal deck and really don't want another tribal deck in those colors. Its really tearing me up because of the limitations I have set. I will put this card in my Jund Snackrifice deck.
ok hear me out--- Urborg, kormus bell are on the battlefield, so all lands are creatures. Cast Mahadi, and while he's on the stack cast an instant speed boardwipe (eg. starswarm or regular boardwipe + vedalken orrery.) Mahadi etbs, you end your turn, all lands and creatures are gone and you have an insane amount of treasure. Jesus [edit: Or just float your mana before wiping then you don't need instant speed for the boardwipe]
Okay look, I love you. I love everything you do. You are a joy and a wonderful boon to this community. However, I am speaking for all fans of both D&D and magic right now. Please for the love of all that is holy, make an Elminster video.
I play Heartless summoning and lots of 1/1 token generators, so as soon as the tokens hit the board they die. it's great with Endrek Sahr, Master Breeder.
Blood Artist, Zulaport Cutthroat, Viscera Seer, Black Market, Dark Prophecy, Erebos Black Hearted, Grim Haruspex, Judith the Scourge Diva, Lolth Spider Queen, Nesting Dragon, Yahenni Undying Partisan & Syr Konrad the Grim. Just to start the Mahadi deck.
Not saying this isn't a great commander on its own, but first thing I see when I look at this is Korvold, Stimulus Package, and the sac outlet of your choice (which you should have plenty of in Korvold, already).
I’m running this D&D module right now and some of my players are mtg players a keep up to date with spoilers… I guess now they know that the Mahadi who has been so helpful to them is not the charming human he appears to be.
Only thing that bothers me slightly is that Mahadi doesn't have Hexproof, Shroud or Ward. I know that B/R are not known for those abilities, but it would be very flavorful since Rakshashas are infamous for their immunity to magic.
Given I literally just made a Jolene deck (which fortunately happened to include a lot of anti treasure tech), I'm absolutely going to sleep on this commander :33
Love the art work the sky is great however 🤔 I feel like the way the hands are done look like they have the thumb on the wrong side of the hand 🤔🤔🤔 but the rest of it looks great and looks forward to trying this commander
It feels like they reprinted Dockside without it actually being Dockside AND it can sit in the command zone. This effect is too cheap, and I hate the design. Really hope I'm wrong, but I think this card is going to cause some issues.
Dockside doesn't require additional cards to work and isn't vulnerable to removal this isn't even close. On top of needing removal or a board wipe to really get going you need a third card to keep him alive if you already put him out early meaning you can't play him then do a board wipe next turn you need enough mana to do it all in one go. 3 card combos that win the game are normal. To get a few treasure is meh.
@@regaleagle6533 The issue is that bc it's your commands, you can build your whole deck around it working. It wouldn't be hard to Blasphemous Act and then play your commander for 4 mama total. The fact that you could easily use any board wipe that kills, and then play your your commander at any time is a very dangerous combo imo. Sure, you have to wait a turn to get the full use out of the treasures, but the amount of mana you have your next untap is something to fear. I see this consistently making a lot of treasures the turn you decide to play it.
@@dawsonnunn2445 It can consistently make treasure but not Dockside consistent. Many board wipes take more than 1 mana and Blasphemous is hardly impervious to board protection. It also doesn't work with superior board wipes that exile. Also it is completely defeated by a removal that says "Destroy target creature" which does nothing against dockside it is already too late. A removal spell they can see they need coming from a mile away when this is in your command zone. It does not combo or loop infinetely with ease. It is good but not nearly on the same power level. It is also super weak to opposing board wipes and players not using creature heavy decks where Dockside just wants your opponent to be using sol ring and similar.
@@regaleagle6533 I see your points, and, on some reconsideration, think you're right that they're two different power levels. It isn't Dockside 2.0. That said, I still feel like it's poor design in that it pushes a play style that feels bad to play against and feels repetitive. I could easily see someone using a repeatable sack engine to get basically infinite mana by their end of turn if no one can stop them (I just hope they actually have a win-con if they do.). Time will tell if this card is as bad as I fear.
@@dawsonnunn2445 it does turn infinite sacrifice into infinite mana but I mean there was already ways to turn infinite sacrifice into infinite damage or mana pretty easily.
"Dont sleep on this commander"
This will go perfectly in my Mathis deck. Its a mass boardwipe/mass revival deck where i basically wipe the board then we all bring back creatures (its kinda a hug deck too we all bring creatures back). Im literally drooling over this card.
I can see making a bunch of devil tokens with “when this creature dies, deal 1 damage to any target” and having 1 go off to set off a chain reaction
Devil tribal is a hilarious direction to take this. I love it.
i'm kinda tired of treasure commanders and decks tbh but it's a powerful card no doubt
It’s kinda just the aggressive direction commander is going. I didn’t mind Prosper cause it was super creative (albeit VERY strong), though it has gotten repetitive.
When am I gonna get my energy commander?
"Wake up dear, time to put the same 25 cards into another treasure deck."
"Yes, WOTC..."
Yea I fill you there I've been avoiding treasure style decks lately bc of it
@@dapperghastmeowregard It has been pretty standardized. I actually think that Wizards is partially worried that new commanders won’t be as powerful as the treasure ones. Has power creep gone too far?
This commander definitely has a lot of potential, but I can see it still being overlooked or being one that people find annoying to play against. The reasons being that it’s either yet another Aristocrats commander, or people get super annoyed by it going in the direction of a bunch of board wipes. Now if there were more payoffs for having a bunch of Treasures (outside of massive spells or storming off), then yeah, it’d be neat, but as it stands, this is a commander that either falls into an already filled theme or into an annoying slot where you board wipe a lot.
What?!?! This is such a strong card. You can easily make at least 2 treasure tokens a turn with that.
Moreover, it is expodential value. The first time you make treasure tokens will give you more mana for the next turn. With this mana you will be able to have more creatures die, so you will make more tokens and so on..
I am not kidding that this card can let you have you like 20 mana on turn 6 if goes unchecked
I would also build this commander much different. I would focus havily on aristocrat strategy which let you killing creatures much easier than removals.
Than i will use the mana to enhance the board state only growing my engine.
The treasures are the cherry on top, letting you recover easily from board wipes and also maybe playing a few huge creatures
This will go in my Negan deck for sure!
I've been wanting to make a Devil tribe deck for some time. I have most of the pieces for it but I kept switching between mono-red and black-red, even thought about Jund devils with the new 3 color commanders. This card is really tempting but I already have a black-red Minotaur tribal deck and really don't want another tribal deck in those colors. Its really tearing me up because of the limitations I have set. I will put this card in my Jund Snackrifice deck.
You know I was *this* close to skipping a set for the first time since I got back in the game, but now…now you have my attention CLB
My lowest TCGPlayer market price is currently $1.08 for my Commander: Streets of New Capenna printing.
Damn this would work really well in treasure Jund/Rakdos sacrifice. Maybe with Bhaal?
This is definitely going in my Ognis Treasure Jund Pile deck
Do you think this would be crazy in a Riveteer Blitz deck?
I have a deck that is perfect for as part of the 99. That said i can already picture the sort of decks i could build around this.
Going straight into the Ziatora treasure deck as soon as it drops
same here
Wait, darksteel plate is expensive?
So fleshbag is a pay 3, net 3-4. Crazy good
ok hear me out--- Urborg, kormus bell are on the battlefield, so all lands are creatures. Cast Mahadi, and while he's on the stack cast an instant speed boardwipe (eg. starswarm or regular boardwipe + vedalken orrery.) Mahadi etbs, you end your turn, all lands and creatures are gone and you have an insane amount of treasure. Jesus
[edit: Or just float your mana before wiping then you don't need instant speed for the boardwipe]
I'm seeing more love for my Strionic resonator lately.💕 So useful
Oh that seems interesting
This will be perfect for my grenzo deck!
Okay look, I love you. I love everything you do. You are a joy and a wonderful boon to this community. However, I am speaking for all fans of both D&D and magic right now.
Please for the love of all that is holy, make an Elminster video.
I play Heartless summoning and lots of 1/1 token generators, so as soon as the tokens hit the board they die. it's great with Endrek Sahr, Master Breeder.
this is Gadrak but even BETTER because it counts tokens and has an extra color.
FOR EACH????? WHAT
In dnd that would be considered a rakshasa, but since magic already has a different version of rakshasa they have to call it a cat devil.
I was looking for a comment like this that would point this out and rakshasa are either devils or act closer to devils in dungeons & dragons lore.
Blood Artist, Zulaport Cutthroat, Viscera Seer, Black Market, Dark Prophecy, Erebos Black Hearted, Grim Haruspex, Judith the Scourge Diva, Lolth Spider Queen, Nesting Dragon, Yahenni Undying Partisan & Syr Konrad the Grim. Just to start the Mahadi deck.
Not saying this isn't a great commander on its own, but first thing I see when I look at this is Korvold, Stimulus Package, and the sac outlet of your choice (which you should have plenty of in Korvold, already).
Hey guys I found the korvold player
I both love and hate this commander. I want to build it
Geez, this is nice
This is going RIGHT into my Juri deck
I wonder if you can go infinite if there is a way to make treasures into creatures.
Wouldn't this be nice in a deck with Prosper as a commander?
Yea i also have one and immediately thought its a good include for that deck or even rakdos the showstopper
Anyone notice the hands are drawn on the wrong sides..lol...(thumbs should be on the outside according to how the hands are positioned)
It's a cat devil. Don't think about it too much.
@@Playlist4Ella that's how the cat devil gets you...beware
It's a Rakshasa, a creature D&D borrowed from Hindu Mythology.
Hellkite tyrant would work amazing in this deck since treasures are technically artifacts!
I’m running this D&D module right now and some of my players are mtg players a keep up to date with spoilers… I guess now they know that the Mahadi who has been so helpful to them is not the charming human he appears to be.
I’m probably going to put this in my ziatora sacrifice deck. Cool card.
I'm not sure I'd put that in my
Prosper deck.
Only thing that bothers me slightly is that Mahadi doesn't have Hexproof, Shroud or Ward.
I know that B/R are not known for those abilities, but it would be very flavorful since Rakshashas are infamous for their immunity to magic.
Fire covenant seems great in this deck
If Jund didn’t already get enough busted cards…
Board wipe dockside?
Damnation, Meathook Massacre are great but expensive with this commander.
Zurgo wrath deck!!!
Fun with helm of the host
Sooo... Gadrak but in Rakdos?
Korvold and this guy are best friends
Well, I bet anyone would be angry if someone decided to randomly sleep on them.
This with shadowborn apostles would be awesome.
Well! Time to go inifinte with Gravecrawler and Phyrexian Altar.
The art, it’s a devil, its strong, AND ITS A DND ACCURATE RAKSHASA LOOK AT THOSE BACKWARDS HANDS
He is not any old rakshasa he is a well know one that runs a business and kills his foes and turns them into soul coins as his treasures.
@@regaleagle6533 even better!
If I sac gravecrawler infinitely and recast him infinitely does this make infinite treasures, or just 1 because gravecrawler is the same creature?
Infinite treasures cause they are different creatures
Khajit has treasure if you have corpses
We sure needed another dockside. Good call wizards.
does it bother anyone else that the art has the guys hands backwards
another really good card is goldspan dragon
Given I literally just made a Jolene deck (which fortunately happened to include a lot of anti treasure tech), I'm absolutely going to sleep on this commander :33
Oh cool board wipe tribal my favourite ( ^:
Love the art work the sky is great however 🤔 I feel like the way the hands are done look like they have the thumb on the wrong side of the hand 🤔🤔🤔 but the rest of it looks great and looks forward to trying this commander
That's the point. Mahadi is a rakshasha, and in the lore of d&d rakshasa have backwards hands.
God I love mahadi in dnd I'm totally making this deck :)))
You could put this one into a jund sacrifice deck
Pitiless Plunderer
Hopefully there is a new ability to build around in baldurs gate
Did anyone else think Reckless Fireweaver immediately upon seeing this or is it just me?
Why is wizards still printing more treasure support. It was better when there was only a little
*something something* only sleep on foil cards *something something* flatten them out
Dope
Nobody will "sleep" on this card it will jump power for Arisocrat decks
wow.
Chainer!
I kind of just want to throw out Kalain with this commander
More of a 99 candidate
It feels like they reprinted Dockside without it actually being Dockside AND it can sit in the command zone. This effect is too cheap, and I hate the design. Really hope I'm wrong, but I think this card is going to cause some issues.
Dockside doesn't require additional cards to work and isn't vulnerable to removal this isn't even close. On top of needing removal or a board wipe to really get going you need a third card to keep him alive if you already put him out early meaning you can't play him then do a board wipe next turn you need enough mana to do it all in one go. 3 card combos that win the game are normal. To get a few treasure is meh.
@@regaleagle6533 The issue is that bc it's your commands, you can build your whole deck around it working. It wouldn't be hard to Blasphemous Act and then play your commander for 4 mama total. The fact that you could easily use any board wipe that kills, and then play your your commander at any time is a very dangerous combo imo. Sure, you have to wait a turn to get the full use out of the treasures, but the amount of mana you have your next untap is something to fear. I see this consistently making a lot of treasures the turn you decide to play it.
@@dawsonnunn2445 It can consistently make treasure but not Dockside consistent. Many board wipes take more than 1 mana and Blasphemous is hardly impervious to board protection. It also doesn't work with superior board wipes that exile. Also it is completely defeated by a removal that says "Destroy target creature" which does nothing against dockside it is already too late. A removal spell they can see they need coming from a mile away when this is in your command zone. It does not combo or loop infinetely with ease. It is good but not nearly on the same power level. It is also super weak to opposing board wipes and players not using creature heavy decks where Dockside just wants your opponent to be using sol ring and similar.
@@regaleagle6533 I see your points, and, on some reconsideration, think you're right that they're two different power levels. It isn't Dockside 2.0.
That said, I still feel like it's poor design in that it pushes a play style that feels bad to play against and feels repetitive. I could easily see someone using a repeatable sack engine to get basically infinite mana by their end of turn if no one can stop them (I just hope they actually have a win-con if they do.). Time will tell if this card is as bad as I fear.
@@dawsonnunn2445 it does turn infinite sacrifice into infinite mana but I mean there was already ways to turn infinite sacrifice into infinite damage or mana pretty easily.
sleeping on cards sounds uncomfortable and bad for keeping their value.
I'm so tired of treasure mechanics. It's not even that special anymore. It's just there.
So many treasure cards....WotC please chill.