Diagonalization

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ก.ค. 2024
  • Now that we know about eigenvalues and eigenvectors, we are ready to learn about diagonalization. This involves writing a matrix as a product of other matrices, one of which is a diagonal matrix, with values only along the main diagonal. This has many applications in computation, so let's take a look!
    Script by Howard Whittle
    Watch the whole Mathematics playlist: bit.ly/ProfDaveMath
    Classical Physics Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDavePhysics1
    Modern Physics Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDavePhysics2
    General Chemistry Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDaveGenChem
    Organic Chemistry Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDaveOrgChem
    Biochemistry Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDaveBiochem
    Biology Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDaveBio
    EMAIL► ProfessorDaveExplains@gmail.com
    PATREON► / professordaveexplains
    Check out "Is This Wi-Fi Organic?", my book on disarming pseudoscience!
    Amazon: amzn.to/2HtNpVH
    Bookshop: bit.ly/39cKADM
    Barnes and Noble: bit.ly/3pUjmrn
    Book Depository: bit.ly/3aOVDlT

ความคิดเห็น • 212

  • @Dan-jq7eq
    @Dan-jq7eq ปีที่แล้ว +489

    This man really just explained 2 weeks worth of content in 8 minutes, what am I paying all this tuition for 🙃

  • @nishantbanjade920
    @nishantbanjade920 5 ปีที่แล้ว +360

    Sir I'm from Nepal ,because of your tutorials I'm able to grab schlorship of $35K . thanks sir

    • @shreejanshrestha1931
      @shreejanshrestha1931 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      That's amazing brother. Kun thau ma k ko payeko ho? Anyway congratulation dhilai vayeni hai. Jay Nepal

    • @habondoemmanuel7558
      @habondoemmanuel7558 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Professor you're really supercalifragilisticexpialidocious

  • @azadprasad856
    @azadprasad856 5 ปีที่แล้ว +122

    Congratulations professor Dave for becoming a father!

  • @greendino9918
    @greendino9918 3 ปีที่แล้ว +152

    Prof Dave, thank you so so much! You literally helped me survive my first year of engineering (calculus, chemistry, and physics) and now I'm back for my second year! Your visuals are so amazing and they make everything super easy to understand!! I just want to let you know that you're doing amazing work and we stem students appreciate you so much!

  • @Prof.afterMATH
    @Prof.afterMATH 4 ปีที่แล้ว +75

    This is always a hard topic to teach. This is straight forward and clear. Great video!

  • @noellelavenza494
    @noellelavenza494 3 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    My professor hasn't lectured all semester and just pointed us at the textbook, and this was the last topic I didn't fully get on my own before our exam today. You're a lifesaver.

  • @nolapickering1917
    @nolapickering1917 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    You're such an incredible teacher! Textbooks are so esoteric where your videos are so accessible :) thank you for your work

  • @fizzy4149
    @fizzy4149 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    I have a PhD in math but professor Dave is so much more well rounded than myself. He's doing matrix algebra here and I'm using his videos to get the gist of population evolution and abiogenesis.

    • @mikuculus3720
      @mikuculus3720 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yea idk how he knows all the physics and math at a level he knows

  • @kevingarza6862
    @kevingarza6862 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This definitely simplified everything that was taught to me in my class lecture. Everything is super clear now. Thank you so much!

  • @ephemeronchimera
    @ephemeronchimera 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Prof Dave: I am currently doing self-study of every math course required for an undergraduate math program and I was having a hell of a time understanding fully how to perform diagonalization! I have read countless textbooks' sections on diagonalization and watched several other videos. I took thorough notes from your mini lecture, followed along with you on the example and am stoked to say I was able to go through the example problem at the end and got everything right. ALSO...nowhere else has anyone mentioned to ALWAYS choose x2=1. That tiny detail helped make everything else click and I agree with you that the process of diagonalization is in fact easy, albeit time-consuming. I cannot thank you enough for this! The way you go through and show every single detail is a TREMENDOUS help! I really appreciate you!

  • @youtubecubedude8940
    @youtubecubedude8940 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Prof Dave is great at teaching, but it’s really the editing that makes these videos so easy to understand.

  • @deuslapis5247
    @deuslapis5247 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I'm currently binging as many linear algebra videos as i can for an upcoming final and i gotta say, yours is really really good.

  • @joserobertopacheco298
    @joserobertopacheco298 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Congratulations for you job, Professor Davis. You make mathematics easy to understand. I wish you were my teacher.

  •  3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    T - 7:17:00 until the exam, thank you! Learned what was chaotically taught in two weeks in under two hours with notes taken and examples calculated by watching two of your videos. The 222 (*3 :])

  • @enes4642
    @enes4642 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You saved me a lot of time Dave. Thanks for the incredible video series.

  • @jevcampbell2301
    @jevcampbell2301 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    THANK YOOUUU SOO MUCH ... HOLY it's people like you why I'm able to go back to school and have hope.. keep doing what you're doing you're helping the mental health of people everywhere... I was so depressed... cause I can't get this and my finals consist mostly of this ... this really helps.. thanks so much.

  • @Anna-qp1fi
    @Anna-qp1fi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Professor Dave will go down in history as one of the greatest legends of all time.

  • @timothyli2820
    @timothyli2820 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Hi Professor Dave! You helped me sooo much before my test! U saved me and my classmates!

  • @komare5344
    @komare5344 ปีที่แล้ว

    Quick thank you to Professor Dave and others like him for the fact that i can just type in a subject i want to learn about and i easily find a few minute video about it that is easy to understand :)

  • @Jerry_TheLittleOne
    @Jerry_TheLittleOne 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is indeed a pure gem! Thank you for posting it 👏

  • @conzopontsho3253
    @conzopontsho3253 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I am from South Africa, because of you i have managed to get My Degree. Thank you so much

  • @MuhammadIbrahim-nx9fg
    @MuhammadIbrahim-nx9fg 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    loved the video. thank you for saving my academics.

  • @petrineys5184
    @petrineys5184 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This was honestly so good. Thank you.

  • @tofubtofub
    @tofubtofub 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Universities around the world NEED professor like you.

  • @mohsen865
    @mohsen865 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    thank you professor.
    every teacher must see you videos first to be qualified for teaching

  • @wavvy94
    @wavvy94 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    How is it that I sat through two lectures on diagonalisation and it hardly made sense, yet after watching this video the entire concept could NOT be any simpler??
    Actual lifesaver, I'm defs getting 100% on my linear algebra quiz tomorrow

  • @yash1152
    @yash1152 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    7:41 "so, lets check comprehension" wowww, never seen that part in any other video. awesome, thanks a lot for including that :)

  • @mouhametcheikhdiop5296
    @mouhametcheikhdiop5296 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much , this is the best i’ve found !

  • @nozawatakahiro7730
    @nozawatakahiro7730 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you, Prof Dave. This video made me clear in this topic otherwise some of text books written in Japanese are so hard to understand for newbie.

  • @noorulain7111
    @noorulain7111 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    5:19 How will we know that in which sequence we put the eigen vectors ,is there any rule of it or we can just randomly put any eigen vector in first coloum or second column.?

  • @willynannbalenia564
    @willynannbalenia564 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are so good at what you do. i hope I become like you in terms of teaching! So cool!

  • @fernanmontevista204
    @fernanmontevista204 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I reading my linear algebra book but i cant comprehend .Looking for several videos but im still confuse halfway..
    This is the video that enable me to understand it clearly.
    Thanks Dr Dave.

  • @Ggk5392
    @Ggk5392 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    great explanation. Thank you so much

  • @Iffat-id9js
    @Iffat-id9js 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks Mr Dave for making the topic so easy😊

  • @user-ye8pt5fg1c
    @user-ye8pt5fg1c 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much professor for your explanation. Good luck

  • @TenaciousDanR
    @TenaciousDanR 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Great video! This helped me so much. I know this is a little late but I just wanted to point out that instead of calculating X inverse to check your answer at the end, you can simply check to see if AX = XD . This is much easier if you are asked a similar question that uses nxn matrices where n > 2 as the computing the inverse becomes more annoying as n increases.

    • @chimphead73
      @chimphead73 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      XD

    • @infernon
      @infernon ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@chimphead73 LOL!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @yomihost2732
    @yomihost2732 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    It really helps me! Thanks a lot!

  • @trainwithyv1011
    @trainwithyv1011 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    4:13 , why did you choose x2 = 1, why not x1 = 1?
    If we take x1 = 1 will our answer be the same ?

  • @haroldvillacorte2092
    @haroldvillacorte2092 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great explanation! Thanks!

  • @lahirujeewantha5208
    @lahirujeewantha5208 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanm you so much sir.. This is another vedio I understood whole concept from you.. you are such a prolific teacher.. Wooh!

  • @kanishka.s.jaeronauticalen8053
    @kanishka.s.jaeronauticalen8053 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your teachings are so awesome sir thankyou

  • @damianomartucci9814
    @damianomartucci9814 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you! I can't understand why professors complicate things so much!

  • @Brantendo64
    @Brantendo64 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    @4:48 Why can we just choose x2 = 1? Don't you get x2 by subtracting 5x and dividing 4 giving you x2= 5x/4 ?

  • @ethanjiang7070
    @ethanjiang7070 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    very clear explanation!

  • @rolandoblest610
    @rolandoblest610 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Your videos are excellen. In my native language: Sus vídeos son excelentes. Thanks a lot

  • @cedricsipakam2601
    @cedricsipakam2601 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love your content so much !

  • @yokubjonabralov6294
    @yokubjonabralov6294 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow thank you, I finally understood this stuff

  • @chathurikadilhani1951
    @chathurikadilhani1951 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much 🔥❤️perfect explanation 💯

  • @karenkamimasumaili137
    @karenkamimasumaili137 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How do you know which eigen vector to use first and second to make up the eigen vector matrix?

  • @leoshi1418
    @leoshi1418 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    How did you just make me understand this so easily :D

  • @edwardmocheko5933
    @edwardmocheko5933 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Prof when i try the example in the end the inverse reads -1,-2,-2 and -2 since we multiplied X by -2...I have been stuck on this for hours..can you please explain it?

  • @srinityapadma5125
    @srinityapadma5125 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much Sir.../\ It is so easy to understand your explanations Sir...

  • @user-saint
    @user-saint ปีที่แล้ว

    Great explanation

  • @abhivaryakumar3107
    @abhivaryakumar3107 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you professor dave
    Just thank you
    You are saving me from failing my math class

  • @michaelharris1884
    @michaelharris1884 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    what do you do if thie L is only equal to one number like for example "L^2+4L+4" will be only equal to -2. Would I use the same one to make two of the same thing? like I get [3,1] for one of my eigen vectors, then would I just write the same thing for my 2nd eigen vector [3,1]

  • @shubhreetbhullar4845
    @shubhreetbhullar4845 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    When I multiplied X^-1DX, the result was not A it was A with the -1 and 2 switched places. Did I do something wrong or is this how it is supposed to be?

    • @luminousvalentine8011
      @luminousvalentine8011 ปีที่แล้ว

      It was X(D)X^-1 as matrix multiplication is not commutative

  • @thebestworst8002
    @thebestworst8002 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Where was this series the beginning of the semester? I now have to cram so much information the days before my final.

  • @XBJASHITHABATULA
    @XBJASHITHABATULA หลายเดือนก่อน

    great explaination

  • @immortalspiritualbeing7037
    @immortalspiritualbeing7037 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    very clear, thank you

  • @pietlemao8491
    @pietlemao8491 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks so much prof

  • @georgiasonter1842
    @georgiasonter1842 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi Professor Dave,
    Thanks for the great linear algebra videos.
    At around 7:00, why did you multiply D by X inverse first? Instead of multiplying matrix X by matrix D first? I didn't think that matrix multiplication was commutative?

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      not being commutative simply means that we can't reverse the order in which we list the matrices, but we can simplify in any order we want, if you do the other multiplication first you should get the same answer

  • @ajeetchella4747
    @ajeetchella4747 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    excellent explanation

  • @qefeng2254
    @qefeng2254 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi, do you have a video to explain why this works?

  • @mohamedabdosalam7093
    @mohamedabdosalam7093 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks alot, you are the best

  • @AlexLeo365
    @AlexLeo365 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice explain sir i love it😍❤

  • @quaminafetchout234
    @quaminafetchout234 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Please why do you normally choose X2=1
    I don’t get that part

  • @sayanjitb
    @sayanjitb 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thanks prof. Dave for your amazing comprehensive but precise talk on linear algebra. In this particular video why are we supposed to take X2 equal to 1 for every time as you were taking? Is this a free variable that allows us to assign any value to it or just for ease calculation as well! Thanks in advance.

    • @tinyasira6132
      @tinyasira6132 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      did u get this ans? i wanna know too

    • @joaocosta3506
      @joaocosta3506 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tinyasira6132 its because it is a free variable, if you reduce to echelon form you'll see that the only pivot will be x1, therefore the x2 will be a free variable.

  • @samaawagih7272
    @samaawagih7272 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank You!🥰🥰

  • @souviksen3362
    @souviksen3362 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great explanation sir

  • @lucaskloosterman3016
    @lucaskloosterman3016 ปีที่แล้ว

    At the last one I had the same eigenvalues 4 and 5 but I turned them around in matrix D. Is that wrong is doesnt it matter?

  • @gooseberry_disliker
    @gooseberry_disliker ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you so much!!!!

  • @resey1999
    @resey1999 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sir, you saved my life

  • @alenasahoo3107
    @alenasahoo3107 ปีที่แล้ว

    you're amazing thank you so much

  • @arisnikou04
    @arisnikou04 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Professor Dave casually saving everyone's ass again this year

  • @hatelovebowel4571
    @hatelovebowel4571 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    professor dave, how do you know how to put the 1 and 2 in that order in the diagonal matrix?

    • @mattsamfab
      @mattsamfab 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      wish he answered this

  • @Myron19
    @Myron19 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Super video!

  • @johnkhan7966
    @johnkhan7966 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    sir in integration video you say that we can find the area of a curve by slipting into a bunch of rectangles a mountain has a curve shape, can we split it in to a bunch of rectangles, please reply

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      yes, the rectangles are infinitely thin so they are essentially lines, but it would be nearly impossible to find a function that corresponds with the topology of a mountain so i don't think it's really meant for that application

  • @yashvats9703
    @yashvats9703 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Professor Dave rocks🤘🤘

  • @azhua123
    @azhua123 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    where do the -4's go at 3:57?

  • @Iffat-id9js
    @Iffat-id9js 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is there only two videos relating to the eigen topic?

  • @lisajose9219
    @lisajose9219 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Really talented.keep it up.

  • @faraday3833
    @faraday3833 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks! but i keep finding X inverse's last row as [ -1,-1 ] instead of [ 5,5 ] at 6:26. I am using the method of reducing the A with its Identity matrix. I also used some online matrix inverse calculators, also they are giving me my result instead of this video's. Are they just mean same thing? Or the video is not correct?

  • @sandippaul468
    @sandippaul468 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can't thank you enough.

  • @veeramallavaishnavi6705
    @veeramallavaishnavi6705 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir, If X2 corresponds to lamda=1 and X1 corresponds to lamda=2 do we get same diagonal matrix?

  • @kaushikdr
    @kaushikdr 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can you explain what XDX-1 means? I understand XD is a matrix of the scaled eigenvectors after the transformation A and X-1 is the inverse of X. However, I don't know what it means for a matrix to be the inverse of the eigenvectors.

    • @louiswouters71
      @louiswouters71 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      If you want to fully understand it, I suggest you watch 3blue1brown's videos about linear algebra, but here is the short version. The matrix A is a matrix that transforms space, everything gets shifted except for the eigenvectors, they just get longer. So what we can do is first map the eigenvectors to our unit vectors (X^-1), then scale those vectors (D), then map them back to the eigenvectors (X). Since these are all linear transformations, this is not only true for the eigenvectors, but also for all other vectors in the 2D plane. So XDX^-1 = A.

  • @alkhaled4976
    @alkhaled4976 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Perfect

  • @shreejanshrestha1931
    @shreejanshrestha1931 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    P.S. in 6:45 ( A= X-1 D X ) is known as eigenvalue decomposition

  • @muthiahpillaipalanichamy3939
    @muthiahpillaipalanichamy3939 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great Professor

  • @rashedriju6990
    @rashedriju6990 หลายเดือนก่อน

    what if for 3 by 3 matrices I got 2 lemda value then how to solve that problem?

  • @babajan5370
    @babajan5370 ปีที่แล้ว

    amazing I understand BST ❤ thnks

  • @jasminliao8940
    @jasminliao8940 หลายเดือนก่อน

    why do they choose the value of x2 = 1 for that equation?

  • @rupalijaipuria3797
    @rupalijaipuria3797 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir can I write eigen vectors at any place during making X matrix

  • @tymofei8586
    @tymofei8586 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    How pure complex eigenvalues of rotation matrix cause rotation by actual elongation with factor lets say 'i' ? Should i think complex plain as 4 dimensional to grasp it intuitively because it doesnt make sense at all like how multiplying complex eigenvector by unit 'i' will scale it in a way so its projection on real plane will be seen as rotation of components of real vectors?

  • @babajan5370
    @babajan5370 ปีที่แล้ว

    excellent sir

  • @sohailaihab1533
    @sohailaihab1533 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    God Bless you Sir

  • @STKeTcH
    @STKeTcH 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    THANK YOU

  • @juanpaez5855
    @juanpaez5855 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    can my D X be in a different order as long as their eigen value/vectors are in the same order respectively to each other?

  • @hugeturnip3520
    @hugeturnip3520 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    thnak you so much

  • @williambyamukama2251
    @williambyamukama2251 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank u professor

  • @kimdull
    @kimdull 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    best explanation i ever seen entire TH-cam videos !!!!
    I have question does D has to be in order of
    1 0
    0 2
    or it doesn't matter if it was
    0 2
    1 0 ?

    • @Entervation
      @Entervation 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The values in D are the eigenvalues, order them from lowest on the top left to highest on the bottom right, following the diagonal :) (As shown from 7:58 and onwards)

    • @jota1858
      @jota1858 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Entervation thnx a lot