Complex, Hermitian, and Unitary Matrices

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ส.ค. 2019
  • Remember when we talked about complex and imaginary numbers? All that a + bi stuff, it was a while ago. Well that can apply to matrices as well! We've been looking at real matrices thus far, but we can have imaginary or complex matrices if we have imaginary or complex terms as entries. What can we do with these? We can find the complex conjugate, we can find the conjugate transpose, we can check to see if matrices are Hermitian, or unitary, lots of stuff! Let's give it a try.
    Script by Howard Whittle
    Watch the whole Mathematics playlist: bit.ly/ProfDaveMath
    Classical Physics Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDavePhysics1
    Modern Physics Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDavePhysics2
    General Chemistry Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDaveGenChem
    Organic Chemistry Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDaveOrgChem
    Biochemistry Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDaveBiochem
    Biology Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDaveBio
    EMAIL► ProfessorDaveExplains@gmail.com
    PATREON► / professordaveexplains
    Check out "Is This Wi-Fi Organic?", my book on disarming pseudoscience!
    Amazon: amzn.to/2HtNpVH
    Bookshop: bit.ly/39cKADM
    Barnes and Noble: bit.ly/3pUjmrn
    Book Depository: bit.ly/3aOVDlT

ความคิดเห็น • 92

  • @ProfessorDaveExplains
    @ProfessorDaveExplains  4 ปีที่แล้ว +116

    Whoops! In the checking comprehension for question 1, the top right entry on that matrix should be 2 + i, not 2 + 1. Sorry!

    • @chemisthenry3001
      @chemisthenry3001 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      sure, thanks for the Video.
      May you put more Math videos related to quantum physics.!

    • @lamalamassu5337
      @lamalamassu5337 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Thank you...but I recognize that from the solution.

    • @mariyahaxix2360
      @mariyahaxix2360 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It is not square matrix

    • @vellabro
      @vellabro 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Amazing Playlist ❤

    • @b_f_d_d
      @b_f_d_d 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@vellabroyup

  • @allisonphysics6416
    @allisonphysics6416 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Thanks for saving me once again Prof. Dave! If you ever add to this series can you cover the following: Symmetric bilinear forms, sesquilinear forms, adjoint/ self-adjoint linear maps, the spectral theorem, Jordan Canonical Form, and positive self-adjoint linear maps.

  • @charmy3021
    @charmy3021 5 ปีที่แล้ว +67

    He knows a lot about all kinds of stuff! Professor Dave Explains~~~

  • @mohammadamanalimyzada1462
    @mohammadamanalimyzada1462 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you so much for the amazing series
    I have learned many things from it

  • @michaelzumpano7318
    @michaelzumpano7318 ปีที่แล้ว

    That was the best explanation I've heard. Thanks. I really appreciated your video where you discussed who you are.

  • @keshosingh5645
    @keshosingh5645 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    explained in very simple and lucid style. thank for the video

  • @Alexandra-he8ol
    @Alexandra-he8ol 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I needed linear algebra for better understanding the data science algorithms. Thanks for the well-structured and clear course!

  • @mddinar
    @mddinar 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This lecture is bloody good.. Thank Prof.

  • @emlmm88
    @emlmm88 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Really liking these math videos. You should do a series on modern algebra as well.

  • @harishbalaji658
    @harishbalaji658 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Professor Dave it was really pakka, crystal clear

  • @jinyoungpung2178
    @jinyoungpung2178 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Crystal clear. Love it!

  • @paraskevidimoraga5960
    @paraskevidimoraga5960 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Excellent, thank you!!

  • @huythai6210
    @huythai6210 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thank you so much it's very clear to understand

  • @areejmohammad7567
    @areejmohammad7567 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    This video is amazing! 👍🏻

  • @alfandosavant4639
    @alfandosavant4639 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    2nd week of engineering major and I need to recall this. Thank you so much!

  • @can_dospreadgospel5770
    @can_dospreadgospel5770 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks very very much Professor. You have really thought me a lot. I’m much grateful. God bless you as well 🙏

  • @newaz1268
    @newaz1268 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks, man! Your video is great.

  • @harshvisaini2843
    @harshvisaini2843 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Amazing lecturer. THanks Professor !!

  • @slainiae
    @slainiae 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fantastically explained.

  • @scottrose9260
    @scottrose9260 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you for this, a layman curious about the world, been looking at treatments of this for years, but founds some pearls of wisdom in this video that I didn't know or realize. I suppose they should have occurred to me by now, but your explanations were simple and intuitive and I feel like I gained meaningful insights. Thanks again, looking forward to more of this.

  • @sapaephyu6532
    @sapaephyu6532 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thx for saving my life, prof.

  • @rohimakhatun6581
    @rohimakhatun6581 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you sir ...... it's more helpful for me .... thanks a lot

  • @sanjana3251
    @sanjana3251 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    In the comprehension question no.1 in the 1st row 2nd column it was written 2+1 but in the answer you have written it in the form of conjugate transpose 2-i

    • @jitenranjan
      @jitenranjan ปีที่แล้ว

      I think it's typing mistake it was 1+i

    • @jitenranjan
      @jitenranjan ปีที่แล้ว

      2+i

  • @josephkennedy6188
    @josephkennedy6188 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This was really well explained! Thanks! I (along with countless others) appreciate this!

    • @toxicrow9473
      @toxicrow9473 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Could you solve the problems?
      I am getting
      1/3 0
      0 1/3
      As the result of unitary Matrix
      It's not identity Matrix tho

    • @josephkennedy6188
      @josephkennedy6188 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@toxicrow9473
      I’ll give it a try!

  • @yettocome786
    @yettocome786 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks a lot Professor Dave💞💞💞💞💞

  • @uditsaxena3844
    @uditsaxena3844 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks sir very clear

  • @lamees1134
    @lamees1134 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are amazing. PLZZZZZZZ keep up the good work up.

  • @ambitionstudypointsurajsah921
    @ambitionstudypointsurajsah921 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent 👌🏻

  • @manjusulekha4042
    @manjusulekha4042 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Second...🙋very usefull video...thank you sir...

  • @bernab
    @bernab 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yes. it is 2+ i. But anyway. Great video. Thank you Professor Dave. Will there be more videos of Linear Algebra??

  • @theanalyser8456
    @theanalyser8456 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is one of the channels that you just see one video and you instantly subscribe 😊

  • @fadia217
    @fadia217 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thats great thank you so much ❤ from Jordan 🇯🇴

  • @user-kh2gn1pn8c
    @user-kh2gn1pn8c 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    شكرا ً جزيلاً
    Thanks a lot

  • @samiransari6707
    @samiransari6707 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is the value of (i) in unitary

  • @nthumara6288
    @nthumara6288 หลายเดือนก่อน

    thank youuu sir

  • @yashaggarwal2822
    @yashaggarwal2822 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Doubt :: i need to find adjoint of Matrix , matrix comprises of Complex elements so
    What i have to do ? I mean I just have to transpose the matrix or to take its conjugate transpose?

  • @anson8570
    @anson8570 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi. I don't know more things about matrix multiplication. But I have a doubt . Why we are taking conjugate transpose instead of transpose for complex matrix multiplication ? What will happen if we don't take conjugate .

  • @sofiyaprincy
    @sofiyaprincy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Professor Dave, I have a topic in my linear algebra and matrix paper called 'Nature of characteristic roots in case of special matrix' . Could you please post on that topic?

  • @momomuscu1261
    @momomuscu1261 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello , what is the identity matrix in C ?

  • @dicksonkachamac787
    @dicksonkachamac787 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    nice one

  • @Tomas-zv2js
    @Tomas-zv2js 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hey how is the conjugate of that original matrix in the first example not -7 but remains as seven but all the other terms have their signs flipped?

  • @damien20ntakirutimana96
    @damien20ntakirutimana96 ปีที่แล้ว

    What does orthonormal basis mean?

  • @user-tn3wh9sx7i
    @user-tn3wh9sx7i 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    한글자막 누가 달았는지는 모르겠지만 감사합니다
    Thank you very much for the Korean subtitles!!

  • @tpeianlee
    @tpeianlee 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    This guy does better than my prof

  • @danielerimantaadapilah1152
    @danielerimantaadapilah1152 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The first entry in column two is 2+i but not 2+1

  • @moreblessingmushohwe6506
    @moreblessingmushohwe6506 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you Professor Dave!!!!
    Ps: Found out you came to Cornell a week ago and I didn't get to see you 😥💔💔

  • @ys1940
    @ys1940 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Could you make a video about cramer's rule

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      i did that already

    • @ys1940
      @ys1940 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ProfessorDaveExplains oh really? I didn't notice that😂

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      check out my mathematics playlist, it's got everything you need

  • @ZaChousenWan
    @ZaChousenWan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    "Change the sign of each imaginary number on the matrix and turn the rows into columns." vs " Show the Transpose of the Complex Conjugate of the given Matrix."
    Good teachers vs sadistic teachers.

  • @dayanulalam1678
    @dayanulalam1678 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    4:56 the linear algebra Jesus confirmed

  • @amk1108
    @amk1108 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    8:15 type on the original matrix. should be 2+i in upper right corner

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      whoopsie! thanks for catching that, i'll pin a comment.

    • @amk1108
      @amk1108 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      thank you for your videos dave! Keep it Up!!

  • @CSBPRAKASHDEEPAK
    @CSBPRAKASHDEEPAK 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can anyone check q3 in exercise?

    • @barfy.man3624
      @barfy.man3624 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Inverse short cut doesn't work for complex matrix

  • @tabindawani6869
    @tabindawani6869 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks a lot for your efforts.
    This video helped me a lot.
    Lots of love,hope and trust from Indian occupied Kashmir.😍

  • @Recordingization
    @Recordingization 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awasome

  • @lukasnegumbo1879
    @lukasnegumbo1879 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Let’s assume it’s right the way it was given and agree to it being a Hermitian Matrix🙂

  • @amogh5427
    @amogh5427 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Easy

  • @chasethescientistsaturre5009
    @chasethescientistsaturre5009 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Time to go to advance mathematics woohoooooooooooooooo

  • @Amanda-if4qp
    @Amanda-if4qp 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i th

  • @omarabduljaleelaltuwaijari4754
    @omarabduljaleelaltuwaijari4754 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you...university of Baghdad

  • @Wiyt
    @Wiyt 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    What's up with your video view to subscriber ratio?

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The only people that are dying to watch a linear algebra tutorial are people who are currently studying linear algebra.

    • @Wiyt
      @Wiyt 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Professor Dave Explains I get that... I just don't understand how other people won't watch. It's such a tiny percentage compared to the people that receive your videos in their subscription box.

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Why would they watch if they aren't studying linear algebra? My content is not at all entertaining.

    • @Wiyt
      @Wiyt 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ProfessorDaveExplains I'm not sure. Why would a channel with almost half a million subs only have 132 patrons on their Patreon?
      I know of people with 100k subs that have over 1000+ patreons. Your channel subscribers compared to the amount of people that watch just doesn't add up. I'd assume people would still click on the videos, unless it's just all botted subs.
      But what do I know?

    • @promorizzics
      @promorizzics 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @Abhay Kamath bad idea

  • @lalegulbuz3496
    @lalegulbuz3496 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    allah anlatsa ancak bu kadar güzel anlatırdı.

    • @unlkc
      @unlkc 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      :D

  • @Yuras20
    @Yuras20 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    If i = sqrt(-1) then -1 = i * i = sqrt(-1) * sqrt(-1) = sqrt( (-1) * (-1) ) = sqrt(1) = 1. That's why I would rather assume i ^ 2 = -1, rather than i = sqrt(-1) because it doesn't lead to such contradictions.

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's not a contradiction. You just said that i^2 = -1, and -i^2 = 1. That's how negative numbers work.

  • @bullee
    @bullee 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wikipedia: In mathematics, a Hermitian matrix is a complex square matrix that is equal to its own conjugate transpose.
    Is this really what you're saying around 5 minutes?

    • @bullee
      @bullee 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ah "hermitian transpose" not the same as "hermitian matrix"