2021 Ford Bronco Sport Badlands - MPG Test | Real-world Highway Range

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 44

  • @patmason7276
    @patmason7276 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    On a 200 mile trip we avg 28 to 30 MPG on her badlands better with premium gas also non ethanol was even better. With turbo engines I've found certain speeds are better for economy. Found this on my 2018 f150 EcoBoost.

    • @thybigballs
      @thybigballs 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Do you use regular or premium?

    • @patmason7276
      @patmason7276 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@thybigballs regular for now. Use 90 non ethanol in my ecoboost f150 and got better fuel mileage. Some areas are using higher alcohol in the fuel now i believe.

    • @ShogunAutoworks
      @ShogunAutoworks 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Also what state or elevation level?

    • @brianxhell
      @brianxhell ปีที่แล้ว

      Where are you located?

  • @KamisamaFaburishio
    @KamisamaFaburishio 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Hey man thank you so much for this real demonstration of the mpg efficiency I was wondering if what the sticker said was real.

  • @FIVEOFEVER
    @FIVEOFEVER 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Nothing like a nice run down I94 past Ann Arbor

  • @Sea0fTime
    @Sea0fTime 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You can't get lower trims with the 2.0, just the Badlands and First Edition, which is a Badlands with added luxury.

  • @Jonatron503
    @Jonatron503 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This is nice! Too bad about the microchip issues going on right now. I think a lot of people won’t be waiting around for it…

    • @fouryearproductions
      @fouryearproductions 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I agree. Surprising how Biden is in bed with China

  • @thetreatmentvisuals
    @thetreatmentvisuals 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Good video... People should do more like this with there car reviews IJS

  • @Android.Paranormal
    @Android.Paranormal 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I did the math and you put in regular. But Ford says the 2.0T... "Regular unleaded (premium recommended)" so that means all gas mileage testing was done by Ford with premium. Also you don't get the full 250hp and 277lb of torque with regular gas.

    • @Android.Paranormal
      @Android.Paranormal 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It probably could get 28-29mpg with the recommended premium. But of course that's more money per mile, still best to run what's recommended.

  • @Wilsonthernsby
    @Wilsonthernsby 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    comment on the ride quality and road noise! Good video!

    • @DailyMotor
      @DailyMotor  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We'll talk about that more in the full review, but both were better than expected! Pretty decent.

  • @ShawnLB
    @ShawnLB 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Decent number for eco mode. Have you tried normal mode?

  • @runawayushould
    @runawayushould ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sorry. My 2022 Bronco Sport Big Bend MPG highway is.... 37 MPG That's my experience after 1 year

    • @NickHsieh
      @NickHsieh 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for sharing. It gives us an idea of how efficient the 1.5L engine (the one most people have) does on the highway. 37 MPG highway in a vehicle that's so upright is impressive. Are you using 87 octane gas or something higher?

    • @runawayushould
      @runawayushould 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@NickHsieh just regular gas.

  • @bobw9297
    @bobw9297 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    was that cruse on or off

  • @5rocklobsters
    @5rocklobsters 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Did you use premium or regular?

    • @Slick_Nick
      @Slick_Nick 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I've heard you get better MPG off premium vs regular

  • @GreyGhost9
    @GreyGhost9 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Kool! Thanks.

  • @doncuong
    @doncuong 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The 2.0L Badlands is rated at 23 mpg per Ford and the 1.5L gets 26 mpg. So it did better than expected.

    • @Slick_Nick
      @Slick_Nick 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      that's combined not highway

  • @CC-gt3ro
    @CC-gt3ro 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The bronco sport badlands is a cool looking car, it is normal it use more gas thanother suv in its class, as it is really a off-road vehicle as well. The other are city suv. The bronco car drive in harsh condition.

  • @1drummer172
    @1drummer172 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Use Shell gas only; best for turbocharged engines.😊

  • @TopSecretVid
    @TopSecretVid 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nailed it out of the park??... 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @jaysson1151
      @jaysson1151 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      What’s so funny?

  • @dannytomaszewski9999
    @dannytomaszewski9999 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Realistic testing doesn’t involve going 70mph, nobody drives the speed limit on the highway

    • @shortstories3349
      @shortstories3349 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I do. I usually drive at, or five below. I get 34-37 mpg highway driving in my Kia Cadenza because of it.

  • @08polaris500HO
    @08polaris500HO 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    27mpg for a body on frame SUV that can hang with the legendary jeep wrangler all day long, sorry, but there is no other substitute model from other brands. These were designed to be a lifestyle symbol and those who buy them probably intend on using them the way they were designed. Just my 2 cents…. Now let’s hear from all the coach potato youtube car gurus.

    • @matthewgaines10
      @matthewgaines10 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Unibody, not body on frame. Same basic platform as the Escape. Nor can it hang with the Wrangler in the most extreme situations. The Jeep Compass Trailhawk actual competes with the Bronco Sport Badlands. Like even the Wrangler, most are not used in off road situations. I don't know what delusional ideas you have but you seem to have alot of things twisted.

    • @jaysson1151
      @jaysson1151 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      How does your foot taste with it in your mouth? Seriously you just made yourself look like a fool calling it a body on frame, which it’s not, and then calling everyone else a ‘coach’ potato… that’s not even close to being considered a typo. Once again since the unveiling of the Bronco Sport, you’re one of the thousands of ignorant NPCs that doesn’t read and mistaken this vehicle with the actual Bronco!
      Now talking about the car itself, it’s a good vehicle. Probably the most rugged and capable compact UNIBODY crossover on the market after watching TFL put it through the ringer. Something I wouldn’t mind driving at all and would breath easier when my wife is driving by herself here in south Louisiana where the rain comes down in buckets and floods everywhere. This can drive through 2 feet of water.

  • @Estoooopid
    @Estoooopid 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    26 mpg? my Silverado did 24 and that was a much larger vehicle.

    • @marktolsma8816
      @marktolsma8816 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Your Silverado also has cylinder deactivation...have fun repairing that after 70k miles

  • @mr.2cents.846
    @mr.2cents.846 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    A Bronko with a three banger. Shame!
    I'll stick with my 2010 Escape Limited. V6, 240hp, power, good gas mileage.

    • @matthewgaines10
      @matthewgaines10 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Except the one in this video has a 4 cylinder 2.0L. It has more horsepower than your 2010 Escape.

    • @mr.2cents.846
      @mr.2cents.846 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@matthewgaines10 more than 240 HP? But probably not as good on gas.

    • @jaysson1151
      @jaysson1151 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@mr.2cents.846 Ugh… you people need to READ and PAY ATTENTION longer than 10 seconds!! He got 27 mpg with this off-road specced version.

    • @MarioLuigi-vb3rp
      @MarioLuigi-vb3rp 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mr.2cents.8462010 ford escape is 171 horsepower

  • @Kev-----
    @Kev----- 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sifter SUCKS

  • @FlyingNDriving
    @FlyingNDriving 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Those freaking wheels, fake steelies has got to be the most dumb idea ever

    • @thybigballs
      @thybigballs 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I have to agree. If you want steelies, just get steelies and the benefits that come with them.