@@NiniBonita Yes, beautiful girl, we hate those filthy Anglo-Saxons, we will take them down soon and they will pay for what they did to you🤺☦🇷🇺That video is such bs😅They're making up migration theories just so it will fit their false narrative of only one common ancestor who came from Africa - wrong. The R1b Chadics are natives of Africa just like the others🤦♂️😂 The "out of Africa" model is a false interpretation of the genetic data. There were 3 identical y-mrcas for us all, not just one, and modern science haven't figured it out yet. This is the true division of the y-dna tree: NOAH (Y-MRCA) | HAM ---- SHEM -- JAPHET (ymrca)(ymrca)(ymrca)x3 | HAM = A00/A0: Cush (A00/A0)-->(AB)»» (A/B/R1b-v88/E3a/E3b1-v32/L) Mitsrayim (A00/A0)-->(E)»» (E3b1-v12/E-v13/T) Put (A00/A0)-->(E)»» (E3b2) Canaan (A00/A0)-->(E1b)»» (E1b1a1,E1b1b1b) SHEM = BCDEF: Elam (BCDEF)-->(J)»» (J2) Arpaxshad (BCDEF)-->(CDEF)»» (CF/D/G/H/IJK/M/NO-O/P/Q/S) Ashur (BCDEF)-->(J)»» (J1a) Lud (BCDEF)-->(G)»» (G1) Aram (BCDEF)-->(G)»» (G2) JAPHET = IJKLT Gomer (IJKLT)-->(k)»» (N3/R1b/R1b) Magog (IJKLT)-->(I)»» (I1) Javan (IJKLT)-->(J/J2)»» (J2a/J2a/J2a/J2b) Tiras (IJKLT)-->(I)»» (I2) Tubal (IJKLT)-->(J2)»» (J2f) Meshech (IJKLT)-->(R)»» (R1a-z283) Madai (IJKLT)-->(R)»» (R2, R1, R1a-Z93)
@@NiniBonita sounds more like conquerors who kicked the sht out of the locals to me. Not everybody can be a winner . Theres always gotta be a loser . Colonizer is a loser word. Its just their way of saying , hey im right here , youre not done yet !
If the sea levels were 500 feet lower all over the world 12500 years ago then it stands to reason that humanity would have lived where the water now covers. Our history is buried under the waves.
People like you are so rare, I am so fed up with those humans, they are so intellectually inferiors. And then they spit some migration nonsense, even if they know that the sahara was full of forests 8000 years ago... The deserts was done by arabs from morocco to india. This is how r1b was divided. Next is a condensed knowledge of mine, be as intelligent and you should be able to fully understand the whole history, with topography and geology. ''' 500 feet lower all over the world 12500 years ago ''''. Keywords : Burn the forests = Pyrocumulus = Melt the ice and snow to get fresh water. Modern story : Kobold mining + Bill gates + Mining Greenland + Wildfires on the whole northern latitudes "california, canada, europe, russia, siberia " => First rain on Greenland August 14, 2021 Ice sheet are more than 3 kilometers thick most of the times. Plus the snow in the mountains melted into rivers, Plus water springs in the earth exposed when the earth, or mountains (ancient plateau of the origin'al garden) is eroded, creating some giant leaks, mud floods and mega rivers like amazon rivers... Remove 3 kilometers of water from the ocean, see the video '' nasa drains the ocean '' and add 50% to recreate the erosion, invisible, on top of that, for the "re-emerged lands". I am pretty sure than less than one million years ago, the ocean did not even exist.
"The area below was unsuitable for frail humans, who had to compete with wild beasts from Africa. So they had no choice but to leave Africa in search of a good land to live in" 6:19. Wha?? Humans have been competing with "wild beasts from Africa" as long as there have been humans. And doing quite well, thank you. Our species didn't abandon Africa, we expanded our range beyond it. We were still in Africa. That's just...never mind.
This video is most definitely Eurocentric. The only thing I agree with is the DNA that shows "North Africans" are really descended from the steppes. The original inhabitants were overtaken. The whole migration theory from 10,000 years ago sounds like foolishness.
Only it is such bs😅You making up migration theories just so it will fit your false narrative of only one common ancestor who came from Africa - wrong. The R1b Chadics are natives of Africa just like the others🤦♂️😂 The "out of Africa" model is a false interpretation of the genetic data. There were 3 identical y-mrcas for us all, not just one, and modern science haven't figured it out yet. This is the true division of the y-dna tree: NOAH (Y-MRCA) | HAM ---- SHEM -- JAPHET (ymrca)(ymrca)(ymrca)x3 | HAM = A00/A0: Cush (A00/A0)-->(AB)»» (A/B/R1b-v88/E3a/E3b1-v32/L) Mitsrayim (A00/A0)-->(E)»» (E3b1-v12/E-v13/T) Put (A00/A0)-->(E)»» (E3b2) Canaan (A00/A0)-->(E1b)»» (E1b1a1,E1b1b1b) SHEM = BCDEF: Elam (BCDEF)-->(J)»» (J2) Arpaxshad (BCDEF)-->(CDEF)»» (CF/D/G/H/IJK/M/NO-O/P/Q/S) Ashur (BCDEF)-->(J)»» (J1a) Lud (BCDEF)-->(G)»» (G1) Aram (BCDEF)-->(G)»» (G2) JAPHET = IJKLT Gomer (IJKLT)-->(k)»» (N3/R1b/R1b) Magog (IJKLT)-->(I)»» (I1) Javan (IJKLT)-->(J/J2)»» (J2a/J2a/J2a/J2b) Tiras (IJKLT)-->(I)»» (I2) Tubal (IJKLT)-->(J2)»» (J2f) Meshech (IJKLT)-->(R)»» (R1a-z283) Madai (IJKLT)-->(R)»» (R2, R1, R1a-Z93)
There are 80 million Hausa people, out of which 70 million are from a recent genetic study in Nigeria. The E strain of the Hausa people in Nigeria is 73%, the B strain is 9%, and the R strain is only 18%. In 2008, the genetic study of the Hausa people was 47% of the Hausa R-line in Sudan, while the Hausa people in Sudan were only one or two million. Early research misled many people
One other thing:thanks Geonomad for the clarity and detail of your post.I’m sure that 90% of viewers were ignorant of how and why that halotype is in Africa.🎉❤🤝👍🧐😮😇🎓🎓🎓🙃🤗🤗🤗
No idea how you can describe those petroglyphs as having "fair-skin, blonde hair, and blue eyes." For one, the image you showed of the Saharan rock art clearly resembles black or red-brown skin tones common in Africa today, along with a few people sporting literal afros, and there is no indication of eye color in a visual style so elementary. Also the current scholarly consensus about the traits you described is that genes associated with that phenotype didn't begin overtaking the dark-haired, dark-skinned (but possibly blue-eyed) Mesolithic Europeans until as recently as 6,000 BC. The Saharan Petroglyphs and entire Green Sahara period are much older, dating from around 12,600 BC to around 3,500 BC. Eurocentric wishful thinking at its best, and entirely unrelated to this video, the authenticity of its claims I am now forced to question. Genotype =/= Phenotype, and as is shown by the Haplogroup R1b (shared by the people of Chad and Western Europe) and, for example, Haplogroup D (shared by the Ainu, Andaman Islanders, and Tibetans), Paternal Haplogroup is not necessarily the only defining factor of physical appearance or traits like "blonde hair, blue eyes, and fair skin."
amy schumer is POC because i see her in met GALA show having very brown skin ariana grande too she is black because her skin is sooo dark when i see her in hollywood
🤺☦🇷🇺Don't defame's God's name! That channel is following the evolution model wtf That is such bs😅You making up migration theories just so it will fit your false narrative of only one common ancestor who came from Africa - wrong. The R1b Chadics are natives of Africa just like the others🤦♂️😂 The "out of Africa" model is a false interpretation of the genetic data. There were 3 identical y-mrcas for us all, not just one, and modern science haven't figured it out yet. This is the true division of the y-dna tree: NOAH (Y-MRCA) | HAM ---- SHEM -- JAPHET (ymrca)(ymrca)(ymrca)x3 | HAM = A00/A0: Cush (A00/A0)-->(AB)»» (A/B/R1b-v88/E3a/E3b1-v32/L) Mitsrayim (A00/A0)-->(E)»» (E3b1-v12/E-v13/T) Put (A00/A0)-->(E)»» (E3b2) Canaan (A00/A0)-->(E1b)»» (E1b1a1,E1b1b1b) SHEM = BCDEF: Elam (BCDEF)-->(J)»» (J2) Arpaxshad (BCDEF)-->(CDEF)»» (CF/D/G/H/IJK/M/NO-O/P/Q/S) Ashur (BCDEF)-->(J)»» (J1a) Lud (BCDEF)-->(G)»» (G1) Aram (BCDEF)-->(G)»» (G2) JAPHET = IJKLT Gomer (IJKLT)-->(k)»» (N3/R1b/R1b) Magog (IJKLT)-->(I)»» (I1) Javan (IJKLT)-->(J/J2)»» (J2a/J2a/J2a/J2b) Tiras (IJKLT)-->(I)»» (I2) Tubal (IJKLT)-->(J2)»» (J2f) Meshech (IJKLT)-->(R)»» (R1a-z283) Madai (IJKLT)-->(R)»» (R2, R1, R1a-Z93)
He is wrong. R1b entered the Chadian gene pool during Baggarization. Baggara Arabs spoke Arabic, not Chadic, implying that people carrying R1b-V88 were not responsible for the spread of Chadic languages, which may have spread approximately 3,700 years ago. We found no evidence for migration of Near Eastern farmers or any ancient episodes involving Eurasian backflow.
🤺☦🇷🇺Don't, because that is such bs🤦♂️😅They're making up migration theories just so it will fit their false narrative of only one common ancestor, who came from Africa - wrong. The R1b Chadics are natives of Africa just like the others - you are the people of Havila, descendants of Cush. The "out of Africa" model is a false interpretation of the genetic data. There were 3 identical y-mrcas for us all, not just one, and modern science haven't figured it out yet. This is the true division of the y-dna tree: NOAH (Y-MRCA) | HAM ---- SHEM -- JAPHET (ymrca)(ymrca)(ymrca)x3 | HAM = A00/A0: Cush (A00/A0)-->(AB)»» (A/B/R1b-v88/E3a/E3b1-v32/L) Mitsrayim (A00/A0)-->(E)»» (E3b1-v12/E-v13/T) Put (A00/A0)-->(E)»» (E3b2) Canaan (A00/A0)-->(E1b)»» (E1b1a1,E1b1b1b) SHEM = BCDEF: Elam (BCDEF)-->(J)»» (J2) Arpaxshad (BCDEF)-->(CDEF)»» (CF/D/G/H/IJK/M/NO-O/P/Q/S) Ashur (BCDEF)-->(J)»» (J1a) Lud (BCDEF)-->(G)»» (G1) Aram (BCDEF)-->(G)»» (G2) JAPHET = IJKLT Gomer (IJKLT)-->(k)»» (N3/R1b/R1b) Magog (IJKLT)-->(I)»» (I1) Javan (IJKLT)-->(J/J2)»» (J2a/J2a/J2a/J2b) Tiras (IJKLT)-->(I)»» (I2) Tubal (IJKLT)-->(J2)»» (J2f) Meshech (IJKLT)-->(R)»» (R1a-z283) Madai (IJKLT)-->(R)»» (R2, R1, R1a-Z93)
R1b (europeans) are distante to other human groups. Genetical distance from a spanish to morroco is 29%. But only 7% to a russian, who is R1a. Different haplogroups are usually different from each other.
@@ct4470R1b entered the Chadian gene pool during Baggarization. Baggara Arabs spoke Arabic, not Chadic, implying that people carrying R1b-V88 were not responsible for the spread of Chadic languages, which may have spread approximately 3,700 years ago. We found no evidence for migration of Near Eastern farmers or any ancient episodes involving Eurasian backflow.
There is none. R1b entered the Chadian gene pool during Baggarization. Baggara Arabs spoke Arabic, not Chadic, implying that people carrying R1b-V88 were not responsible for the spread of Chadic languages, which may have spread approximately 3,700 years ago. We found no evidence for migration of Near Eastern farmers or any ancient episodes involving Eurasian backflow.
There are four plausible scenarios for R1b-V88 in Chadic speaking Africans: 1. From Neolithic Europe into Northern Africa during the Green Sahara via Eastern/Western Hunter Gatherers 2. From Near-Easterners originating in Armenia who back migrated 3. Canaanites/Hyksos or Mitanni migrations into Egypt 4. The Recent movements of Baggara Arabs (Nilo-Saharans are all matriarchal, so easy for founder effect)
@@CurtisThomas-l9p if R1b originated in that African cluster, every R1b would have the V88 marker. But we don't. That means it was a regional mutation and not the founder population.
@@garyhighley9022exactly these people want everything to be originally African, sure the first human haplogroups originate in Africa but the mutation that led to R1B happened in Eurasia and the fact that we only have one group of R1B in Africa whilst having so many variations in Eurasia proves that it originated outside of Africa, we also know the closest variants and the navestir variants of R1B-v88 are found in Eurasia, to my knowledge the closest variant to R1B-v88 is found in southern Europe.
@@2trappy2 yeah they have that Wakanda mentality lol. We know humanoids derived from Africa eons ago but the developed independently in Africa , Australia and Eurasia.
@@2trappy2 There's more Puerto Rican's living in mainland America then the island of Puerto Rico. By your logic Puerto Rican's are originally from Mainland America verse Puerto Rico because there's more living in the mainland. Foolish logic.
No it's not..R1b entered the Chadian gene pool during Baggarization. Baggara Arabs spoke Arabic, not Chadic, implying that people carrying R1b-V88 were not responsible for the spread of Chadic languages, which may have spread approximately 3,700 years ago. We found no evidence for migration of Near Eastern farmers or any ancient episodes involving Eurasian backflow.
🤺☦🇷🇺That is such bs😅You making up migration theories just so it will fit your false narrative of only one common ancestor who came from Africa - wrong. The R1b Chadics are natives of Africa just like the others🤦♂️😂 The "out of Africa" model is a false interpretation of the genetic data. There were 3 identical y-mrcas for us all, not just one, and modern science haven't figured it out yet. This is the true division of the y-dna tree: NOAH (Y-MRCA) | HAM ---- SHEM -- JAPHET (ymrca)(ymrca)(ymrca)x3 | HAM = A00/A0: Cush (A00/A0)-->(AB)»» (A/B/R1b-v88/E3a/E3b1-v32/L) Mitsrayim (A00/A0)-->(E)»» (E3b1-v12/E-v13/T) Put (A00/A0)-->(E)»» (E3b2) Canaan (A00/A0)-->(E1b)»» (E1b1a1,E1b1b1b) SHEM = BCDEF: Elam (BCDEF)-->(J)»» (J2) Arpaxshad (BCDEF)-->(CDEF)»» (CF/D/G/H/IJK/M/NO-O/P/Q/S) Ashur (BCDEF)-->(J)»» (J1a) Lud (BCDEF)-->(G)»» (G1) Aram (BCDEF)-->(G)»» (G2) JAPHET = IJKLT Gomer (IJKLT)-->(k)»» (N3/R1b/R1b) Magog (IJKLT)-->(I)»» (I1) Javan (IJKLT)-->(J/J2)»» (J2a/J2a/J2a/J2b) Tiras (IJKLT)-->(I)»» (I2) Tubal (IJKLT)-->(J2)»» (J2f) Meshech (IJKLT)-->(R)»» (R1a-z283) Madai (IJKLT)-->(R)»» (R2, R1, R1a-Z93)
I+R1b haplotypes were found in skeletons in Lepenski Vir, in today's Serbia, Balkan. Today's European Y chromosome genetic is mostly R1b P297>M269, But those found in Balkan 8000BC was R1b-L754 (which is basically V88). Today present mostly in western Africa.
Interesting. I remember reading about Balkan hunter gatherers mixing with Anatolian hunter gatherers before the Anatolian farmers migrated to Europe. Since haplogroup R is Siberian, perhaps this subclade migrated around the Black Sea into the Middle East, and from there it spread into Africa with farming. Perhaps it would help explain the Chaoskampf myth pattern that is observed most often in people of Ancient North Eurasian ancestry, but also in the Middle East and Egypt.
@@f.el.h637 West Asian, the migration back from Mongolia is assumed therefore not relevant, R1b-v88 may have never left the Levant before migrating westwards and later north again into Europe, We should be talking about Afro-Asiatic genes going into Europe via Spain instead.
I've listened to several Tishkoff lectures and she clearly says the Mbuti and Khoisan populations are genetically most diverse , which would be central and southwest Africa. That said, it's possible Jebel Irhoud was an earlier lineage that diverged before the A00 haplogroup. Would love to know the DNA from Jebel Irhoud...
@@kalestanforde Thanks for replying. I'm aware of the recent Princeton study using IBDmix, but their Neanderthal DNA findings were only generalizable to the populations studied. I have a few questions if you don't mind. 1) Do any African populations exhibit zero Neanderthal DNA; 2) How is it known the defining mutation for haplogroup A is older than the defining mutation for haplogroup B; 3) Some argue that haplogroup B is not descended from haplogroup A, and the two evolved separately. Aside from mutation ages is there any genetic evidence proving haplogroup B/BT descends from haplogroup A/A1b? These questions derive from work published in part by Anatole Klyosov and Ulfur Arnason who contest an OOA origin. Please refer to "The unidirectional phylogeny of Homo sapiens anchors the origin of modern humans in Eurasia" and their subsequent papers for specific arguments. Thanks so much for your time.
🤺☦🇷🇺That is such bs😅You making up migration theories just so it will fit your false narrative of only one common ancestor who came from Africa - wrong. The R1b Chadics are natives of Africa just like the others🤦♂️😂 The "out of Africa" model is a false interpretation of the genetic data. There were 3 identical y-mrcas for us all, not just one, and modern science haven't figured it out yet. This is the true division of the y-dna tree: NOAH (Y-MRCA) | HAM ---- SHEM -- JAPHET (ymrca)(ymrca)(ymrca)x3 | HAM = A00/A0: Cush (A00/A0)-->(AB)»» (A/B/R1b-v88/E3a/E3b1-v32/L) Mitsrayim (A00/A0)-->(E)»» (E3b1-v12/E-v13/T) Put (A00/A0)-->(E)»» (E3b2) Canaan (A00/A0)-->(E1b)»» (E1b1a1,E1b1b1b) SHEM = BCDEF: Elam (BCDEF)-->(J)»» (J2) Arpaxshad (BCDEF)-->(CDEF)»» (CF/D/G/H/IJK/M/NO-O/P/Q/S) Ashur (BCDEF)-->(J)»» (J1a) Lud (BCDEF)-->(G)»» (G1) Aram (BCDEF)-->(G)»» (G2) JAPHET = IJKLT Gomer (IJKLT)-->(k)»» (N3/R1b/R1b) Magog (IJKLT)-->(I)»» (I1) Javan (IJKLT)-->(J/J2)»» (J2a/J2a/J2a/J2b) Tiras (IJKLT)-->(I)»» (I2) Tubal (IJKLT)-->(J2)»» (J2f) Meshech (IJKLT)-->(R)»» (R1a-z283) Madai (IJKLT)-->(R)»» (R2, R1, R1a-Z93)
@@Kolesha the Proto-semitic people had Haplogroups E1B1*...his Indo-European or Caucasian ancestors carrying Haplogroups R must have dwelled among the tents ⛺ of Shem
Yes, the Harvard group has an interesting theory that I was initially attracted by, but I don't think there's much evidence of R1b haplogroups being of SW Asian origin. The evidence is clear that R1b has a very old presence in Europe, and last time I checked, the immediate predecessor haplogroup of V88 is found in Eastern Europe where various subclades of R1b originated - is this still accepted? My understanding is that further back, R itself originated somewhere between central Asia, western Siberia, and the fringes of eastern Europe. I do not buy that it originated in Ma'lta, despite the earliest known sample.
Remember that the Masai are cattle herders, and the original cattle herders were from SWAsia (Anotolia to NW India) which is where domesticated cattle also originated. Therefore SW Asia has to be the place where the R1 haplogroup originated, not W Europe.
I am curious why you think it didn't originate with the Ancient North Eurasians at Malta-Buret? At the Yana Rhinoceros Site, which predates Malta by thousands of years and is in the vicinity of Malta in Siberia, an even older ancestral clade is found in a population called Ancient North Siberian, who are ancestral to Ancient North Eurasians. The sample recovered was haplogroup P, a clade directly ancestral to both haplogroup R and Q. The haplogrouo Q is currently the dominant group in Native Americans, and we know they also have Ancient North Eurasian ancestry. So in other words, Yana RNS cam be interpreted as being ancestral to both Europeans and Natives. Both haplogroup R and Q. Haplogrouo R does not occur outside central and eastern Siberia until much later. All evidence points to Siberia as being the origin point of haplogroup R, and its subclades likely originating in related groups.
@@jonswap9097 Nonsense because all African cattle were domesticated in the Green Sahara from African Auroch these cattle are genetically distinct from Asian Aurochs. Different lineages of cattle. Cattle domestication was done by Y dna e1b1b Africans independently. R-V88 were Hunter-Gatherers from Europe. Steppes people carried R1b but Anatolians didn't so did they go to Africa using Ethiopian Airline? They came from Europe.
We don't know half or what you say or draw on the map. First of all R did not originate in Siberia but almost certainly in South Asia (where R2 abounds, and also the precursor of R and Q: P1) or less likely in West Asia (where R1a and R1b, as well as their cousin Q, originated). It's certain that R1b migrated from West Asia both to Africa and Europe but we know that R1b was present in Europe as early as the Epipaleolithic (Villabruna), so to this day is unclear if European R1b was co-opted by farmers after ariival (as happened with I2 as well) or was brought anew with the Neolithic migrants. Even less clear is what happened in Africa, because it's a different branch (V88), however it is also present and quite diverse in Sardinia and Italy (but almost unheard of in Iberia or otherwise in Western Europe), so V88 is likely to have been carried by farmers from West Asia. However they did not arrive to Africa the way you said but almost certainly via Sudan (where both R1b and I2 are surprisingly abundant), from where they spread as pastoralists to the Chad region, where founder effects probably amplified the impact of the patrilineage. So, sorry but I have to thumbs down: way too many fantasies and a very mixed bag with data.
@@ario4795 - I thought it was R* but in any case... so what? How many ancient samples we have from Southern Asia? There's an intrinsic bias in ancient DNA research in favor of colder latitudes, for reasons of preservation. This bias must be acknowledged and accounted for and balancing must be done from other data, be it archaeological (which establishes the factual "pecking order" of human expansion in Asia-plus) or from modern DNA (which is a complementary source of infor and IMNSHO can and should be used to trace the routes taken by our ancestors in their epic and millenarian journeys). Both these complementary sources very strongly suggest that Y-DNA P originated in Sundaland (modern Malaysia and West Indonesia, cf. Karafet) and that P1 (back-)migrated westwards across Northern India and Pakistan, leaving a trail (P* in Bengal-Bihar, R2 across India, incorporation of South Asian IJ and T, etc.) The same story is told by mtDNA (N/R and M1), adding some uncertainties because mtDNA evolves much slower than Y-DNA so the fine detail is lost. Archaeology also strongly tells us that there was first a migration into "the Indies" (tropical and subtropical Asia east of Iran) c. 100-90 Ka BP (with previous stage in Arabia and Palestine since c. 125 Ka BP) and, separately (intermediate stages are poorly studied yet), that the West Eurasian colonization was a single massive wave c. 50 Ka BP involving West Asia (core region, maybe also including southern Central Asia), Europe, Central Asia (incl. parts of Siberia) and NE Africa (where another matrilocal admiture happened with the natives, incorporating Y-DNA E1b to the West Eurasian genetic pool most notably, also some lesser L(M,N) mtDNA lineages). This last is the early Upper Paleolithic and the former is Middle Paleolithic of various types but quite notably Aterian and Nubian techno-cultures very clearly in India and persisting across the Toba ashes (cf. Petragila).
It's like questioning the truth of ooa's theory. how many samples were taken from the rest of the earth? you just don't want if R comes from Siberia though P and R basal even the oldest Q found there.
@@wftvtfrctyhrtd - Again, the problem is exactly what you mention: "how many samples were taken from the rest of the earth?" Or, in this case, from ancient West and South Asia? None: we have some West Asian ancient samples only from the Neolithic and South Asian ancient DNA is almost non-existent altogether. That's a bias of researchers, a problem of state introduced barriers and difficulties to prehistoric research (India especially has not been very collaborative), a problem of wars (before the civil war, Syria was one of the most productive countries in the region in terms both archaeological and archaeogenetic) and a problem of preservation (the hotter the climate, the worse DNA is preserved). So what I say is that it's only natural that we have many early derived branches in Siberia, because it's cold, has always been cold, and, before this very year Russia was very accessible to research. That doesn't mean that people originated there but that branches from further south arrived there and left remains that we haven been able to find and analyze successfully. It's an intrinsic bias we must beware of.
@@LuisAldamiz Approximately 47,000-50,000 years ago，K enter South Asia，they split into K2 and LT，K1a/L stay in South Asia，K1b/T enter West Asia，K2 enter Indochina Human presence in Southeast Asia dates back to at least 40,000 years ago, when the current islands formed a continental shelf called Sundaland. In the Philippine Islands, Peninsular Malaysia, and Andaman Islands, there exist indigenous groups collectively called Negritos whose ancestry can be traced to the “First Sundaland People” K2，They split into K2a and K2b... 1，K2b1 (M,S) → went south mixed with local Denisovan, and became Papuan peoples, Melanesians, Australian Aborigines, Polynesians 2，Y dna K2b2 (Q,R) ，P1 through Indochina/Sunda Shelf→Northern China/Tianyuan Cave→Siberia，they split into Q and R（about 30,000 years ago） 3，Y dna K2a-M2313 (N,O) stay in Indochina，NO enter South China，they split into N and O，Then , N1a enter Siberia（about 10,000-15,000 years ago）and Northeast Europe O has two primary branches: O1 and O2 O1 enter Indochina through South China→Baiyue，Austronesian，Mon-Khmer，Tai-Kadai，Japanese Korean aborigines
@@夜行者-s2x You may mean K2, not K, which also includes K1 (IJ and LT essentially), which coalesced in South Asia. Both descend from F (also coalesced in South Asia, unlike its "brother" C, which seems more oriental), which also includes H (typical Souh Asian) and G (a bit more mysterious but I'd say that derived from some lesser ancient South Asian clade whose trail we have not found). In general F all the way to K seems to have coalesced in South Asia but K2 migrated eastwards, where it may have put pressure on C and D, displacing them outwards from the more fertile regions of SE Asia, there split between K2a (N and O), which headed to the north or stayed in Indochina and K2b (incl. P, M and S), which seems to have coalesced in Sundaland and sent branches to Australasia (M and S) and westwards back into South and West Asia (P1). The key point of disagreement among us seems to be that you force P1 to go through North Asia in a time when it was almost deserted of modern humans, and not accounting for related developments like the westward expansion of associated mtDNA (which left a trail in South Asia, notably R subclades but also some of the N(xR) variant), or the Y-DNA P1 trail it also clearly left there (notably P1* and R2 but maybe even R1 coalesced in the subcontinent, judging on the available data, R1b and R1a however seem from West Asia already. Another key indication is that in their back-migration westwards that population incorporated some South Asian patrilineages, notably IJ and T (but not L for whatever random reason), as well as some H (somewhat common in European Paleolithic ancient DNA) but not a single bit of South Asian mtDNA. Therefore they must have been matrilocal, which is also confirmed by the gender-unequal admixture pattern in or near Egypt. This is very unlike the patterns we observe in the two clear Paleolithic Siberian expansions, that of proto-Amerinds first and Uralics later: these show very marked patrilocality instead, retaining most of their ancestral Y-DNA but incorporating very large amounts of mtDNA from where they found other peoples. I must also add, even if it may be less obviously supportive of what I say, that they also carried some Y-DNA C with them, leaving a trail of C5 in South Asia and of som C1 (distantly related to Japanese C1) in (again) the Paleolithic European ancient DNA data set. Don't just look at the Y-DNA and don't just (please!) accept that findings in Siberia mean automatically origin in Siberia. Siberia is just a freezer that preserves DNA better than in other places, especially the tropical and subtropical landscape that our ancestors favored originally.
Interesting Video! I’m gonna check out more. I was wondering when it comes to Africa and the eldest race have you heard that they have the most diverse DNA with the black woman having the most dominant genes if they are the 1st race on this planet does that mean all life started in Africa before gene modification where than we began to expand and separate?
🤺☦🇷🇺That is such bs😅You making up migration theories just so it will fit your false narrative of only one common ancestor who came from Africa - wrong. The R1b Chadics are natives of Africa just like the others🤦♂️😂 The "out of Africa" model is a false interpretation of the genetic data. There were 3 identical y-mrcas for us all, not just one, and modern science haven't figured it out yet. This is the true division of the y-dna tree: NOAH (Y-MRCA) | HAM ---- SHEM -- JAPHET (ymrca)(ymrca)(ymrca)x3 | HAM = A00/A0: Cush (A00/A0)-->(AB)»» (A/B/R1b-v88/E3a/E3b1-v32/L) Mitsrayim (A00/A0)-->(E)»» (E3b1-v12/E-v13/T) Put (A00/A0)-->(E)»» (E3b2) Canaan (A00/A0)-->(E1b)»» (E1b1a1,E1b1b1b) SHEM = BCDEF: Elam (BCDEF)-->(J)»» (J2) Arpaxshad (BCDEF)-->(CDEF)»» (CF/D/G/H/IJK/M/NO-O/P/Q/S) Ashur (BCDEF)-->(J)»» (J1a) Lud (BCDEF)-->(G)»» (G1) Aram (BCDEF)-->(G)»» (G2) JAPHET = IJKLT Gomer (IJKLT)-->(k)»» (N3/R1b/R1b) Magog (IJKLT)-->(I)»» (I1) Javan (IJKLT)-->(J/J2)»» (J2a/J2a/J2a/J2b) Tiras (IJKLT)-->(I)»» (I2) Tubal (IJKLT)-->(J2)»» (J2f) Meshech (IJKLT)-->(R)»» (R1a-z283) Madai (IJKLT)-->(R)»» (R2, R1, R1a-Z93)
R1b in Europeans is clustered in archaic populations like Euskadi. It’s not particularly surprising to find it in subSaharan African populations because it’s very old and the European and African populations are both descendants of an older population that lived in the Sahara before it became desertified.
R1b entered the Chadian gene pool during Baggarization. Baggara Arabs spoke Arabic, not Chadic, implying that people carrying R1b-V88 were not responsible for the spread of Chadic languages, which may have spread approximately 3,700 years ago. We found no evidence for migration of Near Eastern farmers or any ancient episodes involving Eurasian backflow.
@@Jordi_Llopis_i_Torregrosa96 it’s the basic theory of human diaspora, Einstein. The archaeology indicates its soundness. What do you propose, ancient aliens?
@@zokavulin Absolute nonsense u Slavic melt.. who are slavs feeding? U lot have been slaves for most part of history.. r1b in the region is from Arabs not Europeans
Here in America we're all mixed so all bets are off. I Know white guys who have sub Saharan YDNA from hundreds of years ago...and you may have a male European lineage. But it's all very interesting indeed.
@@garyhighley9022 color is just a racial construct. Understanding Genetics helps people understand how we are all human. Interestingly the 3 major Haplogroups of AB, DE, and CF*(GHIJKLMNOPQRST) looks similar to Ham, Shem, and Japheth respectively
Just "The Sahara", not "The Sahara Desert". "Sahara" means "desert". On the subject matter, there has to be another explanation, one that also gives a genetic perspective from the point of mutations. Ninety two percent of Norwegians cluster in Ethiopian haplotypes. But that does not say much.
this video is extremely well edited and researched. i’d like to point out at 2:13 the map showering berbers has a spot in chad, however no berbers live in chad.
🤺☦🇷🇺That is such bs😅You making up migration theories just so it will fit your false narrative of only one common ancestor who came from Africa - wrong. The R1b Chadics are natives of Africa just like the others🤦♂️😂 The "out of Africa" model is a false interpretation of the genetic data. There were 3 identical y-mrcas for us all, not just one, and modern science haven't figured it out yet. This is the true division of the y-dna tree: NOAH (Y-MRCA) | HAM ---- SHEM -- JAPHET (ymrca)(ymrca)(ymrca)x3 | HAM = A00/A0: Cush (A00/A0)-->(AB)»» (A/B/R1b-v88/E3a/E3b1-v32/L) Mitsrayim (A00/A0)-->(E)»» (E3b1-v12/E-v13/T) Put (A00/A0)-->(E)»» (E3b2) Canaan (A00/A0)-->(E1b)»» (E1b1a1,E1b1b1b) SHEM = BCDEF: Elam (BCDEF)-->(J)»» (J2) Arpaxshad (BCDEF)-->(CDEF)»» (CF/D/G/H/IJK/M/NO-O/P/Q/S) Ashur (BCDEF)-->(J)»» (J1a) Lud (BCDEF)-->(G)»» (G1) Aram (BCDEF)-->(G)»» (G2) JAPHET = IJKLT Gomer (IJKLT)-->(k)»» (N3/R1b/R1b) Magog (IJKLT)-->(I)»» (I1) Javan (IJKLT)-->(J/J2)»» (J2a/J2a/J2a/J2b) Tiras (IJKLT)-->(I)»» (I2) Tubal (IJKLT)-->(J2)»» (J2f) Meshech (IJKLT)-->(R)»» (R1a-z283) Madai (IJKLT)-->(R)»» (R2, R1, R1a-Z93)
This interesting video reminds me some stories in Bible, Qur'an, and some other ancient texts... Would you suggest me some books and papers used as references for this video?
please translate all into Portuguese Brazil is very important because we Brazilians are the most missigenated people in the world.. I have 9 European nations. German. Dutch. French. Irish. Scottish. Welsh. Italian .Ukrainian. Portuguese. Nigerian.Kenya.West Africa. mbuti congo. mandé .seneganbia .is Mesoamerican Andean Central and South America
I have r1b v88. 98% of my dna is Celtic-Germanic . I have less than 1% of DNA that is considered “sub Saharan “. My paternal lineage that has this DNA come from Malta.
R1b그룹이 유럽보다 아프리카에 더 우세한거죠? 지난번 영상에서 러시아, 중앙아시아의 R에서 파생된 r1a는 주로 유럽으로, r1b는 아프리카로 갔다고 본 것 같은데, 제가 이해 한것이 맞나 모르겠네요....r1b V88 SNP가 우세하다고 해서 30프로 정도 나오나 싶었는데, 90프로 나오는 곳도 있다고 하니 진짜 인종을 구별하는데 중요한 마커인듯 합니다. 초승달 지역은 지도상 보면 성경의 가나안땅 듯합니다. 젖과 꿀이 흐른다는 비옥하고 환경이 좋은 땅~~언제나 좋은 영상 재미있게 보고 있습니다. 엄청난 수고와 열정이 느껴집니다^^
Maybe you should read a bit more than what you have. Canaan was Hams son, so that area would belong to a black group of people similar to Somalians or Fulanies
Gioiello Tognoni demonstrated more than 10 years ago, against all, that R-V88 was born in Europe and not in Middle East as all thought, and that is proved from aDNA now. Sylvain, ask the Harvardians, the theorists of the "Southern arc theory", how many hg. R1b they found in aDNA in Middle East older than those found in Europe beginning from Villabruna, Italy, 14000 ybp.
We have several dna samples in europe with dna for light skin, and one dna example without the dna for light skin. So automatically we say that there could've been darker skinned people living with the lighter skinned people, but if they dark skin, than it's not possible for lighter skinned people to exist along side them. If one is dark skinned they're all dark skinned. If some are light skinned, there is likely dark skinned there as well, we just haven't found it yet. And no, it's not possible for the one dark skin to be an outlyer. We found a dark skin so they're all dark skin. That's how science works. What a joke... ha, ha....
@@liteneyIt's about environment. It's easy to survive in Europe with dark skin; all one needs is a diet rich in Vitamin D. However, it's not easy to survive in Africa with light skin, because the intense UV radiation of the Sun can induce skin cancer and folate-depletion in light skin, especially near the equator.
@@SaintFort So you're saying ancient light skinned people didn't exist in africa? Because they did, regardless if you like it or not. That's like saying people who have dna that's not the norm wouldn't exist, as it would've been evolved out of them. That's not science, and you're burying the lead. We're talking about Europe, not Africa. If they find an ancient human with light skinned dna in Europe, they claim there has to be dark skinned people there as well, we just haven't found them yet. Where as if they find an ancient human with dark skinned dna, they claim they were all dark skinned people. That's not science. That's racist.
Hopefully if you talking about the concentration of haplogroup G and how got it spread from mesopotamia to reach the Caucasian region . Your videos really interesting. Thank you.
🤺☦🇷🇺That is such bs😅You making up migration theories just so it will fit your false narrative of only one common ancestor who came from Africa - wrong. The R1b Chadics are natives of Africa just like the others🤦♂️😂 The "out of Africa" model is a false interpretation of the genetic data. There were 3 identical y-mrcas for us all, not just one, and modern science haven't figured it out yet. This is the true division of the y-dna tree: NOAH (Y-MRCA) | HAM ---- SHEM -- JAPHET (ymrca)(ymrca)(ymrca)x3 | HAM = A00/A0: Cush (A00/A0)-->(AB)»» (A/B/R1b-v88/E3a/E3b1-v32/L) Mitsrayim (A00/A0)-->(E)»» (E3b1-v12/E-v13/T) Put (A00/A0)-->(E)»» (E3b2) Canaan (A00/A0)-->(E1b)»» (E1b1a1,E1b1b1b) SHEM = BCDEF: Elam (BCDEF)-->(J)»» (J2) Arpaxshad (BCDEF)-->(CDEF)»» (CF/D/G/H/IJK/M/NO-O/P/Q/S) Ashur (BCDEF)-->(J)»» (J1a) Lud (BCDEF)-->(G)»» (G1) Aram (BCDEF)-->(G)»» (G2) JAPHET = IJKLT Gomer (IJKLT)-->(k)»» (N3/R1b/R1b) Magog (IJKLT)-->(I)»» (I1) Javan (IJKLT)-->(J/J2)»» (J2a/J2a/J2a/J2b) Tiras (IJKLT)-->(I)»» (I2) Tubal (IJKLT)-->(J2)»» (J2f) Meshech (IJKLT)-->(R)»» (R1a-z283) Madai (IJKLT)-->(R)»» (R2, R1, R1a-Z93)
Something is wrong. R1b was already present in Europe much before, there are eastern gravettians and epigravettians who were R1b in the middle of upper paleolithic.
One of the things we never explore in these videos is the transformation of dark skinned humans who are the aboriginal peoples of all continents into the people we see today throughout Europe, Asia, and mostly in the Americas who are not Africoid. These stories into the genetic diversity doesn’t neatly square into both archaeological evidence, as well as many of the forensic evidence we find in cultural references. We are likely missing a exciting chapter of our humans story, merely looking at such a myopic view and thinking it is the complete story. That way, surprises of finding a “European“ gene inside of the African continent could be explained by connecting the aboriginal Europeans in the north, who likely initially had Africa white features that then got spread to later populations, who migrated there afterwards. Investigating this will also prevent us from applying today’s Geo political realities to history that tends to hide or even disparage the realities that these areas were once populated by different races of people. This is likely the case of populations throughout northern east Africa, to the entirety of the Arabian peninsula towards the civilizations of the Fertile Crescent, as well as the Indus valley, given other videos, which expressed key parts, showing that the oldest human populations have by far the greatest level of phenotypical differences as well as genetic variations, it makes sense that those jeans would find themselves in populations that today look nothing like the progenitor phenotypes.
Correct, what is considered.modern African or European can not be transposed on to the ancient past. North Africa plus Arabia was a hotspot of human activity and maybe even the birthplace of humanity.
No the r1b haplogrouo just traveled around everywhere and left their DNA wherever they went north Africa used to be much more habitable than it is today and it was easy to go there even preferable to other places it only became a desert relatively recently on a large timescale for a while EVERYONE wanted to go there
@@UpperNileGuy R1b entered the Chadian gene pool during Baggarization. Baggara Arabs spoke Arabic, not Chadic, implying that people carrying R1b-V88 were not responsible for the spread of Chadic languages, which may have spread approximately 3,700 years ago. We found no evidence for migration of Near Eastern farmers or any ancient episodes involving Eurasian backflow.
I think people have to really understand that haplogroups for the most part don't mean genetic makeup as we think today. There are some white people who have E1B1A ( not a lot) but the issue is that people have to understand that a haplogroup being "european" in origin does not mean that the origins of that haplogroup population are the same people of today. What it means is a single male won the genetic lottery. r1b is 20, 000 years old. The europeans that we see today had an african ancestor that migrated to eurpe and formed subclades. Some traveled back to africa, some kept moving through europe. Therefore the genes will return to africa and dispersed in europe. For example that people can understand..... If 100 people in a Nigerian village left and went to the UK, then they marry each other's daughters and sons off, the offspring will form a subgroup or subclade due to concentrated breeding. ( The recessive genes will be very dormant and the dominant genes will be very expressive which formed that new subgroup.) We'll call this new subgroup N1B. It will be a European ORIGIN haplogroup originating in the UK. The males will now carry this lineage. If some of the males return to Nigeria and have children with local women, Then those males will still carry haplogroup N1B. If the ones that stayed in the Uk have children with women in the uk, those males will still carry N1B. Thus sharing a common male ancestor. If the sons marry white women in the Uk and their sons do the same, Then you will have white Uk populations with N1B (if it becomes dominant) and black populations in nigeria with N1B.
My 👊🏿😅, see hein the problem is that Europeans want to connection to Africa , hence a subclade is formed for those that returned to Africa but the one in Europe remains the same … R1B V88 for the African one 😂… I’ll tell you the problem , see hein the Roman Empire had so many black soldiers and these men fathered so many children across the western coast of Europe hence the Y chromosome is still there as well as in Africa in high concentrations. But because they don’t like to admit to common sense then stories are created .. But really they absorbed our kingship and our ways and then resented us till today… Which is why the message of slavery regarding African people has been the only message in the history books 😅, you see the deception all to take peoples attention from the real truth or truths
@@sensei2353 that’s like say that because men apeared in Africa, inuit had to apear in Africa. Or you simply mean thst the far ancestors of those haplogroups eere from Africa? Yes. Still, haplogroup R didn’t apeared in Africa.
This video is quite interesting, my maternal line is Hausa/Fulani. The Hausas are indigenous to Northern Nigeria (Hausaland), and originated from Nigeria (Hausa Bakwai) where 90% of the Hausas allover the world live in their villages, and cities. How come the R1b is found in Europe, except they migrated there and not the other way round.
The first humans came out of Africa so it’s not surprised. I highly doubt that they came from Europe to Africa but the other way round. From African into Europe based on historical records. Hopefully you will make a video of the genocide skeletons still at the chad desert 🇬🇲🇬🇲
@@NubiansNapata so your saying it's from R1B is Arab but the problem today's Arabs are not one people they are arabicised Arabs If you study the deep history of the Arabs from Arab literature they will admit that today's Arabs arab because their ancestors of different backgrounds took on Arab culture and language and so became part of the the original ethnic Arab group . The original Arab group look like Africans and are originally part of a mixture of kushite peoples and the kushite themselves are a mix of many different African tribes of old
@@Samba652 No, they weren't, you are an ignorant afrocentric. Yes, most Arabs are Arabized peoples, but the original Arabs are the Ishmaelite tribes of Arabia and the Levant - descendants of Abraham and his brother, cousins of the Jews, and todays majority population of Arabia. They all carry haplogroup J1e. They belong to the Semitic race, while Cushites belong to the Hamitic race, which also includes the so called Natufians, who are nothing but the first Canaanites (no, geniuses, they were only linguistically Semitic, not genetically, so don't start with that again lol)
🤺☦🇷🇺That is such bs😅You making up migration theories just so it will fit your false narrative of only one common ancestor who came from Africa - wrong. The R1b Chadics are natives of Africa just like the others🤦♂️😂 The "out of Africa" model is a false interpretation of the genetic data. There were 3 identical y-mrcas for us all, not just one, and modern science haven't figured it out yet. This is the true division of the y-dna tree: NOAH (Y-MRCA) | HAM ---- SHEM -- JAPHET (ymrca)(ymrca)(ymrca)x3 | HAM = A00/A0: Cush (A00/A0)-->(AB)»» (A/B/R1b-v88/E3a/E3b1-v32/L) Mitsrayim (A00/A0)-->(E)»» (E3b1-v12/E-v13/T) Put (A00/A0)-->(E)»» (E3b2) Canaan (A00/A0)-->(E1b)»» (E1b1a1,E1b1b1b) SHEM = BCDEF: Elam (BCDEF)-->(J)»» (J2) Arpaxshad (BCDEF)-->(CDEF)»» (CF/D/G/H/IJK/M/NO-O/P/Q/S) Ashur (BCDEF)-->(J)»» (J1a) Lud (BCDEF)-->(G)»» (G1) Aram (BCDEF)-->(G)»» (G2) JAPHET = IJKLT Gomer (IJKLT)-->(k)»» (N3/R1b/R1b) Magog (IJKLT)-->(I)»» (I1) Javan (IJKLT)-->(J/J2)»» (J2a/J2a/J2a/J2b) Tiras (IJKLT)-->(I)»» (I2) Tubal (IJKLT)-->(J2)»» (J2f) Meshech (IJKLT)-->(R)»» (R1a-z283) Madai (IJKLT)-->(R)»» (R2, R1, R1a-Z93)
Since men and women migrate together, wouldn't consistent pattern of a haplotype in the (male) Y chromosome be matched by consistent pattern of a haplotype in (female) mitochondrial DNA? And wouldn't a mismatch indicate that something is very wrong? Here they talk about the male haplotype, but say nothing about the female. How can that be?
Y-dna migrations didnt always bring mtdna haplogroups of their kin with it, especially in the case of indo-european expansions which was nearly entirely paternally mediated, These were young men that had left their tribe and were expanding into the world, Look up the koryos.
@@damianscott3710 The genes of these blood group systems are autosomal, except XG and XK which are X-borne, and MIC2 which is present on both X and Y chromosomes. The antigens can be integral proteins where polymorphisms lie in the variation of amino acid sequence (e.g., rhesus [Rh], Kell), glycoproteins or glycolipids (e.g., ABO)
I don’t think anyone knows how genes really work. For some reason I look more Greek then most Greeks, more Italian then most Italians and more Egyptian then most Egyptians 🗿🤷🏿♂️🗿
Then your ancestor didn't came from Africa, like the R1b-v88 which are natives of Africa. 🤺☦🇷🇺That vid is such bs😅They're making up migration theories just so it will fit their false narrative of only one common ancestor who came from Africa - wrong. The R1b Chadics are natives of Africa just like the others🤦♂️😂 The "out of Africa" model is a false interpretation of the genetic data. There were 3 identical y-mrcas for us all, not just one, and modern science haven't figured it out yet. This is the true division of the y-dna tree: NOAH (Y-MRCA) | HAM ---- SHEM -- JAPHET (ymrca)(ymrca)(ymrca)x3 | HAM = A00/A0: Cush (A00/A0)-->(AB)»» (A/B/R1b-v88/E3a/E3b1-v32/L) Mitsrayim (A00/A0)-->(E)»» (E3b1-v12/E-v13/T) Put (A00/A0)-->(E)»» (E3b2) Canaan (A00/A0)-->(E1b)»» (E1b1a1,E1b1b1b) SHEM = BCDEF: Elam (BCDEF)-->(J)»» (J2) Arpaxshad (BCDEF)-->(CDEF)»» (CF/D/G/H/IJK/M/NO-O/P/Q/S) Ashur (BCDEF)-->(J)»» (J1a) Lud (BCDEF)-->(G)»» (G1) Aram (BCDEF)-->(G)»» (G2) JAPHET = IJKLT Gomer (IJKLT)-->(k)»» (N3/R1b/R1b) Magog (IJKLT)-->(I)»» (I1) Javan (IJKLT)-->(J/J2)»» (J2a/J2a/J2a/J2b) Tiras (IJKLT)-->(I)»» (I2) Tubal (IJKLT)-->(J2)»» (J2f) Meshech (IJKLT)-->(R)»» (R1a-z283) Madai (IJKLT)-->(R)»» (R2, R1, R1a-Z93)
For the origins of R1b and R1a we should really look at the Latitude at which Mal'ta Buret and Afontova Gora are found....even the route they travelled would have been approximately at that Latitude. Somewhere between 24 000 and 18 000 years ago. If I remember correctly the Villabruna cluster is estimated to have started to form around that time already....18 000 years ago. My guess is R1b formed somewhere between the Southern Urals, Caucasus and the North Eastern Carpathians...
It's most likely Central Asia. There are multiple R1b subclades that are relatively absent from Europe, but unique to Central Asia. R1b's age is also 23,000 years old, and the oldest rooted R1b, older than all the rest INCLUDING Villabruna, comes from Uzbekistan. Villabruna is only 14,000 years old In addition to this, Mal'ta Boy shares a high degree of affinity towards Iranian neolithic people, meaning that there was a migration of Iranian-like DNA into Siberia by 24,000 years ago, which is right around when R1b was about to arise. How would Iranian DNA get into Lake Baikal? Through Central Asia
@@AKu-xs5vg You forgot about Yana RHS who is much Older and related to Mal'ta and Tianyuan Man.....If there was a migration from Southern Central Asia it had to predate those samples. So I think we have to look at when Ust Ishim man reached Southern Siberia around 45 000 years ago....
@@asialee8102 Or albinos fleeing from thousands of years of being treated like animals in Africa? And thousands of years of being sold as slaves in Africa, from the time the Tower of Bable fell in the Book of Jasher: until the United States Marines fought on the shores of Tripoli in Libya in the 19th century, Europeans and eventually Americans were fleeing slavery, and were commonly sold as slaves in Africa. Look into it online... "Like a hunted animal run to ground, the little girl was cornered. Branded a 'ghost' on account of her striking white skin, Mariam Emmanuel had been chased through her African village, in a remote corner of Tanzania, by a bloodthirsty mob. Exhausted and terrified, the five-year-old slumped in the dust at the end of an alley. She whimpered and cowered while the adults surrounded her and sharpened their knives and machetes. Then they set to work, butchering her and dividing up her remains between themselves." They're worth more if they scream loud and long, so... 'Mariam did not have the benefit of being unconscious before she died,' said one shocked investigator. 'She was killed, like an animal, by grown men who showed no compassion for another human being.' Mariam's crime? She was an albino, one of more than 17,000 black Africans who suffer from a rare genetic condition that makes their skin white and their hair red or blond. In many African nations - but most commonly in Tanzania - albinos are butchered in the street. Their remains are used in the macabre human potions used by traditional healers to treat the sick. Believing it will bring them good luck and big catches, fishermen on the shores Lake Victoria weave albino hair into nets. Bones are ground down and buried in the earth by miners, who believe they will be transformed into diamonds. The genitals are made into treatments to bolster sexual potency."
The genetic peer-reviewed research seems unclear whether certain sub-Saharans do not possess Neandertal DNA, and I've heard genealogical reports also confirming certain African individuals show zero Neandertal DNA. Can anyone confirm this finding, and also clarify whether certain African populations likewise show zero Eurasian admixture? Thanks for any assistance on these topics.
It's unclear whether or not Neanderthal genes have been found in people living in sub-Saharan Africa from what I know and know. Sorry for not providing clear information.
@@geonomad1 Hey no problem! I have located some studies where several sub-Saharan populations showed Neandertal ancestry, but the key question is whether these results may be generalized to 'all' sub-Saharan populations. Have you read the peer-reviewed Princeton paper titled, "Identifying and Interpreting Apparent Neanderthal Ancestry in African Individuals"? The study employed a new detection methodology called IBDmix, and based on the populations sampled I was wondering if you believe their findings are generalizable to the entire African population. Would enjoy hearing your thoughts, if possible. Thanks!
i have less than 2% neanderthal and my y group is R1b-P25 so that means the neanderthals intermingled with R1b way down stream and that is more than likely how Europeans turned white because they were originally darker. My family is from Jamaica (west African diaspora) most people in that area with R1b have V88. the separation at around R-M269 reminds me of the story of Esaú and Jacob. V88 (Jacob) did settle in the levant for a time before migrating back to Africa. and his brother went into the caucus mountain region before migrating west (yamnaya) which is interesting
@@jasonborn867 All human populations, who are not modern indigenous hunter gatherers, have Neanderthal, Denisovan or unknown archaic introgression or a mixture.
@@captivesojournerThe last academic paper I read claims that if Neanderthals mated with humans it happened in the Levant/Arabian Peninsula area 50,000 years ago which was before modern humans populated Europe. The original anatomically modern Europeans were dark because they consisted of several direct out of Africa migrations that began over 30,000 years ago. R1b was a back-migration. It consisted of dark-skinned Africans who left the continent following the herds of animals into Asia. Those same Africans migrated to the Levant and some of them returned home to the African continent. They eventually became pastoralists of the wet Sahara. When the Sahara dried, they were isolated in the south. Africans have the highest frequency of albinism. My theory is one of the groups of R1b that did not return to Africa were albinos. They migrated to the Caucuses mt. region and settled there for thousands of years. Eventually, the albino trait became fixed, and those light skinned R1b carriers migrated to Europe. Based on models they killed all males who were not R1b and mated with the females.
It is so, so, so, so funny that the narrator is saying that the Africans are Europeans instead of saying that Europeans has the African DNA when it is the origin DNA. And when everybody according to the science are from Africa.
Because you don't understand the video. It's not as clear as what most people think. Yes genes mostly flowed out of Africa but some flowed back into Africa. This particular haplogroup originated out of Africa and moved into Africa. It's really not that complicted
@@woozyz2769 yes. And you know that europeans were in the Sahel less than a century, right? And the video has in account their known descendants, it haven’t signalized the basters of South Africa.
Hello…The fact that a nation carries a haplogroup to a large extent does not mean that the source of that haplogroup is that nation. The important thing is that they carry the oldest genes and have many mutations. Kurds carry the R1b haplogroup, which is the oldest form of the r1b haplogroup. Neolithic farmers in southeast Anatolia carried this gene. Thousands of years ago with cattle herds, R1b spread to the world from southeast anatolia. Not only did it spread to Europe, countries like Chad and Cameroon also carry R1B (v88) almost entirely. The source of haplogroup r1b is the neolithic ancestors of the Kurds.. Kurds still live in those lands.. Kurds are the father of civilization
Watched a bunch of these vids .im not a dna expert was hoping on seeing more on greek dna me being greek. But no help here im curious about the 1000 plus studies on graves from bronze age
This haplogroup R is not European and has no connection to Europe. It entered Europe and came from Asia as invaders and exterminated the original inhabitants of Europe. Haplogroup R is Asian and the ancestors of the Africans who carry this lineage never crossed Europe.
This is proof that haplogroup doesn't identify ethic group, but instead genetic mutation. You claiming they are Europeans because of their mutation but I can argue that Europeans are negro Africans because R1 mutations can be trace backward to them. The Fulani aren't Europeans because modern Europeans have that mutation but instead they are Africans who migrated back to Africa while another group migrated to Europe. This proves that Fulani was the original while those who migrated to Europe became further admixed with the "Europeans".
The primitive Fulani people were members of the Mandelian language family, who lived and grazed around the Niger River. Initially, the Fulani people were E1a, which can be found in places where Fulani people were present. Later, only more Atlantic Congo language speakers, such as E-M2 (E1b1a), were mixed in because they were speakers of the Niger Congo language family and were easily assimilated. The population of the Chadian language family (Kirdi people) is very exclusive, and the Fulani people dislike them. In the 19th century, the Fulani people launched a holy war to invade their territory, and the Fulani people enslaved their Chadian language family (Kirdi people). The vast majority of the Chadian speaking population are farmers The truth is that 86% of Fulani people in Cameroon are African patrilineal haplogroups, with the majority being E1a (E-M132), while Fulani people in Sudan are close to 54% R1b.
They don't want to hear that especially as they again attempt to insert, steal or otherwise modify history to place themselves as being the father of all mankind... Amazing, these people have spent centuries staying as far as possible from anything Negroid, next they will become Haplogroup Adam, A00 which is the goal...They traveled all over exploring and leaving their seed along the way. That's how I see that foreign seed taking hold, not much unlike slavery.
As a Welshman I am chuffed to Beans to have 'family' in Africa irrespective of Skin Colour. If this truth doesn't destroy Racism I don't know what does. I suppose the R1A lot might get ansi but that's a whole other ball game :-)
@@famitsus987ok let me post the lastest study of R1B in the region. They found that genetic diversity in Chad was broadly divided by a north-south axis. The core ancestry of Southern Chadians was Central African, most closely related to Pygmies. Southern Chadians then experienced four waves of gene flow over the last 3,000 years from West-Central Africans, Eastern Africans, West-Central Africans again, and then Arabians. In contrast, Northern Chadians did not share Central African ancestry and were not influenced by the first wave of West-Central Africans but were influenced by Northern African ancestry. found that Y DNA haplogroup R1b entered the Chadian gene pool during Baggarization. Baggara Arabs spoke Arabic, not Chadic, implying that people carrying R1b-V88 were not responsible for the spread of Chadic languages, which may have spread approximately 3,700 years ago. We found no evidence for migration of Near Eastern farmers or any ancient episodes involving Eurasian backflow.
@@famitsus987investigated the genetic history of Chad, in the context of the Sahel as well as in the global context. We did not find evidence of immigration of Near Eastern farmers or ancient Eurasians of any sort. We found that the Y DNA haplogroup R1b correlated with the presence of Arabian and Western Asian ancestries in the Sudanese gene pool. Using autosomal data, we found that Western Asian and Arabian ancestries mixed in the 13th century prior to entering the Sudanese gene pool. We found that Arabian ancestry migrated from east to west, having entered the Sudanese gene pool 20 generations ago, the Chadian gene pool 15 generations ago, and the Cameroonian and Nigerian gene pools 10 generations ago. Linguistic data
The red dots he showed are locations of ancient skeletons found with the haplogroups named. Ancient skeletons compared with modern sample groups is how we know where each comes from.
"Chad was a megachad" lmao well-phrased
Yet the massive genocide skeletons are still in the Chad desert left by the colonizers 🇬🇲
@@NiniBonita Yes, beautiful girl, we hate those filthy Anglo-Saxons, we will take them down soon and they will pay for what they did to you🤺☦🇷🇺That video is such bs😅They're making up migration theories just so it will fit their false narrative of only one common ancestor who came from Africa - wrong. The R1b Chadics are natives of Africa just like the others🤦♂️😂
The "out of Africa" model is a false interpretation of the genetic data. There were 3 identical y-mrcas for us all, not just one, and modern science haven't figured it out yet. This is the true division of the y-dna tree:
NOAH (Y-MRCA)
|
HAM ---- SHEM -- JAPHET
(ymrca)(ymrca)(ymrca)x3
|
HAM = A00/A0:
Cush
(A00/A0)-->(AB)»»
(A/B/R1b-v88/E3a/E3b1-v32/L)
Mitsrayim
(A00/A0)-->(E)»»
(E3b1-v12/E-v13/T)
Put
(A00/A0)-->(E)»»
(E3b2)
Canaan
(A00/A0)-->(E1b)»»
(E1b1a1,E1b1b1b)
SHEM = BCDEF:
Elam
(BCDEF)-->(J)»»
(J2)
Arpaxshad
(BCDEF)-->(CDEF)»»
(CF/D/G/H/IJK/M/NO-O/P/Q/S)
Ashur
(BCDEF)-->(J)»»
(J1a)
Lud
(BCDEF)-->(G)»»
(G1)
Aram
(BCDEF)-->(G)»»
(G2)
JAPHET = IJKLT
Gomer
(IJKLT)-->(k)»»
(N3/R1b/R1b)
Magog
(IJKLT)-->(I)»»
(I1)
Javan
(IJKLT)-->(J/J2)»»
(J2a/J2a/J2a/J2b)
Tiras
(IJKLT)-->(I)»»
(I2)
Tubal
(IJKLT)-->(J2)»»
(J2f)
Meshech
(IJKLT)-->(R)»»
(R1a-z283)
Madai
(IJKLT)-->(R)»»
(R2, R1, R1a-Z93)
@@NiniBonita sounds more like conquerors who kicked the sht out of the locals to me. Not everybody can be a winner . Theres always gotta be a loser . Colonizer is a loser word. Its just their way of saying , hey im right here , youre not done yet !
@@correctpolitically4784What goes around comes around.
@@EbikeAdventures667 cept when darwin makes the rules. And he does. I heard they wrote all their secret plans in cursive. And used basic math.
🤔 A lot of these haplotypes letter groups did a lot of moving around. Currently, LGBTQ groups can be easily found in major cities around the world.
😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂😂
Is it Chadic to be LGBTQ nowadays 🥱
😭😭😭😭
🤣🤣🤣👍🏽
If the sea levels were 500 feet lower all over the world 12500 years ago then it stands to reason that humanity would have lived where the water now covers. Our history is buried under the waves.
People like you are so rare, I am so fed up with those humans, they are so intellectually inferiors.
And then they spit some migration nonsense, even if they know that the sahara was full of forests 8000 years ago... The deserts was done by arabs from morocco to india.
This is how r1b was divided.
Next is a condensed knowledge of mine, be as intelligent and you should be able to fully understand the whole history, with topography and geology.
''' 500 feet lower all over the world 12500 years ago ''''.
Keywords : Burn the forests = Pyrocumulus = Melt the ice and snow to get fresh water.
Modern story : Kobold mining + Bill gates + Mining Greenland + Wildfires on the whole northern latitudes "california, canada, europe, russia, siberia " => First rain on Greenland August 14, 2021
Ice sheet are more than 3 kilometers thick most of the times.
Plus the snow in the mountains melted into rivers,
Plus water springs in the earth exposed when the earth, or mountains (ancient plateau of the origin'al garden) is eroded, creating some giant leaks, mud floods and mega rivers like amazon rivers...
Remove 3 kilometers of water from the ocean, see the video '' nasa drains the ocean '' and add 50% to recreate the erosion, invisible, on top of that, for the "re-emerged lands".
I am pretty sure than less than one million years ago, the ocean did not even exist.
TH-cam is definitely underrating this amazing academic documentary
It's a great episode!
The reason why R1B is in Africa is because lake Chad is where Yakub’s laboratory was.
Yacub’s laboratory was moved to 125th street in the early 1970’s.
YO, THAT CLONE STORY GOT OLD S LONG TIME AGO
Delusional stories black people made up for themselves in order to feel better about their lack of history. Sad and pathetic
@@rafaels.3969 The migration of man is old,yet here we are
Yakub’s lab in Chad? Mm🤔, that sounds like fantasy and not real science.
"The area below was unsuitable for frail humans, who had to compete with wild beasts from Africa. So they had no choice but to leave Africa in search of a good land to live in" 6:19. Wha?? Humans have been competing with "wild beasts from Africa" as long as there have been humans. And doing quite well, thank you. Our species didn't abandon Africa, we expanded our range beyond it. We were still in Africa. That's just...never mind.
This video is a bit Eurocentric
@@plntycash This video is a bit ridiculous
This video is most definitely Eurocentric. The only thing I agree with is the DNA that shows "North Africans" are really descended from the steppes. The original inhabitants were overtaken. The whole migration theory from 10,000 years ago sounds like foolishness.
Aidetic cannibals
Let them know 👁️
You can’t believe Everything on yT.
Really appreciate the effort you put in these videos.
Thank You.
Only it is such bs😅You making up migration theories just so it will fit your false narrative of only one common ancestor who came from Africa - wrong. The R1b Chadics are natives of Africa just like the others🤦♂️😂
The "out of Africa" model is a false interpretation of the genetic data. There were 3 identical y-mrcas for us all, not just one, and modern science haven't figured it out yet. This is the true division of the y-dna tree:
NOAH (Y-MRCA)
|
HAM ---- SHEM -- JAPHET
(ymrca)(ymrca)(ymrca)x3
|
HAM = A00/A0:
Cush
(A00/A0)-->(AB)»»
(A/B/R1b-v88/E3a/E3b1-v32/L)
Mitsrayim
(A00/A0)-->(E)»»
(E3b1-v12/E-v13/T)
Put
(A00/A0)-->(E)»»
(E3b2)
Canaan
(A00/A0)-->(E1b)»»
(E1b1a1,E1b1b1b)
SHEM = BCDEF:
Elam
(BCDEF)-->(J)»»
(J2)
Arpaxshad
(BCDEF)-->(CDEF)»»
(CF/D/G/H/IJK/M/NO-O/P/Q/S)
Ashur
(BCDEF)-->(J)»»
(J1a)
Lud
(BCDEF)-->(G)»»
(G1)
Aram
(BCDEF)-->(G)»»
(G2)
JAPHET = IJKLT
Gomer
(IJKLT)-->(k)»»
(N3/R1b/R1b)
Magog
(IJKLT)-->(I)»»
(I1)
Javan
(IJKLT)-->(J/J2)»»
(J2a/J2a/J2a/J2b)
Tiras
(IJKLT)-->(I)»»
(I2)
Tubal
(IJKLT)-->(J2)»»
(J2f)
Meshech
(IJKLT)-->(R)»»
(R1a-z283)
Madai
(IJKLT)-->(R)»»
(R2, R1, R1a-Z93)
@@geonomad1how you come up to this bullshit
@@geonomad1 white slavery is still in Africa in every single nation
@@andhnamazi285Neolithic remains and other ancient remains show the migration patterns. Modern humans only show where the line ended up, dearyo.
This is far too complex and speculative for me to blindly accept what has been said here.
There are 80 million Hausa people, out of which 70 million are from a recent genetic study in Nigeria. The E strain of the Hausa people in Nigeria is 73%, the B strain is 9%, and the R strain is only 18%. In 2008, the genetic study of the Hausa people was 47% of the Hausa R-line in Sudan, while the Hausa people in Sudan were only one or two million. Early research misled many people
One other thing:thanks Geonomad for the clarity and detail of your post.I’m sure that 90% of viewers were ignorant of how and why that halotype is in Africa.🎉❤🤝👍🧐😮😇🎓🎓🎓🙃🤗🤗🤗
No idea how you can describe those petroglyphs as having "fair-skin, blonde hair, and blue eyes." For one, the image you showed of the Saharan rock art clearly resembles black or red-brown skin tones common in Africa today, along with a few people sporting literal afros, and there is no indication of eye color in a visual style so elementary. Also the current scholarly consensus about the traits you described is that genes associated with that phenotype didn't begin overtaking the dark-haired, dark-skinned (but possibly blue-eyed) Mesolithic Europeans until as recently as 6,000 BC. The Saharan Petroglyphs and entire Green Sahara period are much older, dating from around 12,600 BC to around 3,500 BC. Eurocentric wishful thinking at its best, and entirely unrelated to this video, the authenticity of its claims I am now forced to question. Genotype =/= Phenotype, and as is shown by the Haplogroup R1b (shared by the people of Chad and Western Europe) and, for example, Haplogroup D (shared by the Ainu, Andaman Islanders, and Tibetans), Paternal Haplogroup is not necessarily the only defining factor of physical appearance or traits like "blonde hair, blue eyes, and fair skin."
Thats why we should take these videos with a grain of salt
Yes and in particular Fulani, same hairstyles and cattle too.
White skin is not fair skin
amy schumer is POC because i see her in met GALA show having very brown skin ariana grande too she is black because her skin is sooo dark when i see her in hollywood
@@goldsteinman ion know about that but those Ethiopian Jews would be considered “Black” if and when they come here so…
Your channel is a god sent gift, thanks for your efforts
Thank you very much for your positive comments.
🤺☦🇷🇺Don't defame's God's name! That channel is following the evolution model wtf That is such bs😅You making up migration theories just so it will fit your false narrative of only one common ancestor who came from Africa - wrong. The R1b Chadics are natives of Africa just like the others🤦♂️😂
The "out of Africa" model is a false interpretation of the genetic data. There were 3 identical y-mrcas for us all, not just one, and modern science haven't figured it out yet. This is the true division of the y-dna tree:
NOAH (Y-MRCA)
|
HAM ---- SHEM -- JAPHET
(ymrca)(ymrca)(ymrca)x3
|
HAM = A00/A0:
Cush
(A00/A0)-->(AB)»»
(A/B/R1b-v88/E3a/E3b1-v32/L)
Mitsrayim
(A00/A0)-->(E)»»
(E3b1-v12/E-v13/T)
Put
(A00/A0)-->(E)»»
(E3b2)
Canaan
(A00/A0)-->(E1b)»»
(E1b1a1,E1b1b1b)
SHEM = BCDEF:
Elam
(BCDEF)-->(J)»»
(J2)
Arpaxshad
(BCDEF)-->(CDEF)»»
(CF/D/G/H/IJK/M/NO-O/P/Q/S)
Ashur
(BCDEF)-->(J)»»
(J1a)
Lud
(BCDEF)-->(G)»»
(G1)
Aram
(BCDEF)-->(G)»»
(G2)
JAPHET = IJKLT
Gomer
(IJKLT)-->(k)»»
(N3/R1b/R1b)
Magog
(IJKLT)-->(I)»»
(I1)
Javan
(IJKLT)-->(J/J2)»»
(J2a/J2a/J2a/J2b)
Tiras
(IJKLT)-->(I)»»
(I2)
Tubal
(IJKLT)-->(J2)»»
(J2f)
Meshech
(IJKLT)-->(R)»»
(R1a-z283)
Madai
(IJKLT)-->(R)»»
(R2, R1, R1a-Z93)
We real germans always knew what we are °° And the rest of these mixed creatures seemingly too ://
I am from Chad and I appreciate this message.
He is wrong. R1b entered the Chadian gene pool during Baggarization. Baggara Arabs spoke Arabic, not Chadic, implying that people carrying R1b-V88 were not responsible for the spread of Chadic languages, which may have spread approximately 3,700 years ago. We found no evidence for migration of Near Eastern farmers or any ancient episodes involving Eurasian backflow.
@@NubiansNapata tu es tchadien ?
@@abdelkaderbenchamakh8942 Both of them are wrong - Chad are natives to Africa wtf🤦♂️😅
🤺☦🇷🇺Don't, because that is such bs🤦♂️😅They're making up migration theories just so it will fit their false narrative of only one common ancestor, who came from Africa - wrong. The R1b Chadics are natives of Africa just like the others - you are the people of Havila, descendants of Cush.
The "out of Africa" model is a false interpretation of the genetic data. There were 3 identical y-mrcas for us all, not just one, and modern science haven't figured it out yet. This is the true division of the y-dna tree:
NOAH (Y-MRCA)
|
HAM ---- SHEM -- JAPHET
(ymrca)(ymrca)(ymrca)x3
|
HAM = A00/A0:
Cush
(A00/A0)-->(AB)»»
(A/B/R1b-v88/E3a/E3b1-v32/L)
Mitsrayim
(A00/A0)-->(E)»»
(E3b1-v12/E-v13/T)
Put
(A00/A0)-->(E)»»
(E3b2)
Canaan
(A00/A0)-->(E1b)»»
(E1b1a1,E1b1b1b)
SHEM = BCDEF:
Elam
(BCDEF)-->(J)»»
(J2)
Arpaxshad
(BCDEF)-->(CDEF)»»
(CF/D/G/H/IJK/M/NO-O/P/Q/S)
Ashur
(BCDEF)-->(J)»»
(J1a)
Lud
(BCDEF)-->(G)»»
(G1)
Aram
(BCDEF)-->(G)»»
(G2)
JAPHET = IJKLT
Gomer
(IJKLT)-->(k)»»
(N3/R1b/R1b)
Magog
(IJKLT)-->(I)»»
(I1)
Javan
(IJKLT)-->(J/J2)»»
(J2a/J2a/J2a/J2b)
Tiras
(IJKLT)-->(I)»»
(I2)
Tubal
(IJKLT)-->(J2)»»
(J2f)
Meshech
(IJKLT)-->(R)»»
(R1a-z283)
Madai
(IJKLT)-->(R)»»
(R2, R1, R1a-Z93)
@@abdelkaderbenchamakh8942 no.. sudanese Nubian.
Artificial narration and instructional video background music. Powerful.
What does the occurrence of R1b mean to differences or closeness of these different human groups?
R1b (europeans) are distante to other human groups. Genetical distance from a spanish to morroco is 29%. But only 7% to a russian, who is R1a. Different haplogroups are usually different from each other.
Basically white people with dark skin.
It's not R1b-M269. Only V-88 line
Have you considered the migration of Arabian people to Sahel and Chad region?
No r1b people i think
Arabs sleep with there family members so no.
@@randomdiscordmeme no he's correct
@@ct4470R1b entered the Chadian gene pool during Baggarization. Baggara Arabs spoke Arabic, not Chadic, implying that people carrying R1b-V88 were not responsible for the spread of Chadic languages, which may have spread approximately 3,700 years ago. We found no evidence for migration of Near Eastern farmers or any ancient episodes involving Eurasian backflow.
@@NubiansNapata okay
What about R1b from North America?
There is none. R1b entered the Chadian gene pool during Baggarization. Baggara Arabs spoke Arabic, not Chadic, implying that people carrying R1b-V88 were not responsible for the spread of Chadic languages, which may have spread approximately 3,700 years ago. We found no evidence for migration of Near Eastern farmers or any ancient episodes involving Eurasian backflow.
It came with the french and britts ...
There are four plausible scenarios for R1b-V88 in Chadic speaking Africans:
1. From Neolithic Europe into Northern Africa during the Green Sahara via Eastern/Western Hunter Gatherers
2. From Near-Easterners originating in Armenia who back migrated
3. Canaanites/Hyksos or Mitanni migrations into Egypt
4. The Recent movements of Baggara Arabs (Nilo-Saharans are all matriarchal, so easy for founder effect)
Or from the group originating there and migrating out
@@CurtisThomas-l9p if R1b originated in that African cluster, every R1b would have the V88 marker. But we don't. That means it was a regional mutation and not the founder population.
@@garyhighley9022exactly these people want everything to be originally African, sure the first human haplogroups originate in Africa but the mutation that led to R1B happened in Eurasia and the fact that we only have one group of R1B in Africa whilst having so many variations in Eurasia proves that it originated outside of Africa, we also know the closest variants and the navestir variants of R1B-v88 are found in Eurasia, to my knowledge the closest variant to R1B-v88 is found in southern Europe.
@@2trappy2 yeah they have that Wakanda mentality lol. We know humanoids derived from Africa eons ago but the developed independently in Africa , Australia and Eurasia.
@@2trappy2 There's more Puerto Rican's living in mainland America then the island of Puerto Rico. By your logic Puerto Rican's are originally from Mainland America verse Puerto Rico because there's more living in the mainland. Foolish logic.
Do you do maternal haplogroups too?
I'd love to see one on M. I'm M1A1 and Somali
It seems that it will take some time to organize the maternal haplogroups.
@@geonomad1 what about my halopgroup E-m132 where we come from
@@ahmedmuhammad2163 Mali country in Africa can easily find halopgroup E-m132 (Y-DNA)
@@EAB-m4h but it's origin is not 🇲🇱 its sudan but it's found in 🇲🇱
It's found in Egyptian mummies
This is so incredibly informative. Thank you!
No it's not..R1b entered the Chadian gene pool during Baggarization. Baggara Arabs spoke Arabic, not Chadic, implying that people carrying R1b-V88 were not responsible for the spread of Chadic languages, which may have spread approximately 3,700 years ago. We found no evidence for migration of Near Eastern farmers or any ancient episodes involving Eurasian backflow.
🤺☦🇷🇺That is such bs😅You making up migration theories just so it will fit your false narrative of only one common ancestor who came from Africa - wrong. The R1b Chadics are natives of Africa just like the others🤦♂️😂
The "out of Africa" model is a false interpretation of the genetic data. There were 3 identical y-mrcas for us all, not just one, and modern science haven't figured it out yet. This is the true division of the y-dna tree:
NOAH (Y-MRCA)
|
HAM ---- SHEM -- JAPHET
(ymrca)(ymrca)(ymrca)x3
|
HAM = A00/A0:
Cush
(A00/A0)-->(AB)»»
(A/B/R1b-v88/E3a/E3b1-v32/L)
Mitsrayim
(A00/A0)-->(E)»»
(E3b1-v12/E-v13/T)
Put
(A00/A0)-->(E)»»
(E3b2)
Canaan
(A00/A0)-->(E1b)»»
(E1b1a1,E1b1b1b)
SHEM = BCDEF:
Elam
(BCDEF)-->(J)»»
(J2)
Arpaxshad
(BCDEF)-->(CDEF)»»
(CF/D/G/H/IJK/M/NO-O/P/Q/S)
Ashur
(BCDEF)-->(J)»»
(J1a)
Lud
(BCDEF)-->(G)»»
(G1)
Aram
(BCDEF)-->(G)»»
(G2)
JAPHET = IJKLT
Gomer
(IJKLT)-->(k)»»
(N3/R1b/R1b)
Magog
(IJKLT)-->(I)»»
(I1)
Javan
(IJKLT)-->(J/J2)»»
(J2a/J2a/J2a/J2b)
Tiras
(IJKLT)-->(I)»»
(I2)
Tubal
(IJKLT)-->(J2)»»
(J2f)
Meshech
(IJKLT)-->(R)»»
(R1a-z283)
Madai
(IJKLT)-->(R)»»
(R2, R1, R1a-Z93)
@@NubiansNapata wrong, Chadics and R1b-v88 are natives to Africa
@@EasternRomeOrthodoxy it's not
@@EasternRomeOrthodoxy r haplotype itself has it's origin in Eurasia
I+R1b haplotypes were found in skeletons in Lepenski Vir, in today's Serbia, Balkan.
Today's European Y chromosome genetic is mostly R1b P297>M269, But those found in Balkan 8000BC was R1b-L754 (which is basically V88). Today present mostly in western Africa.
Interesting. I remember reading about Balkan hunter gatherers mixing with Anatolian hunter gatherers before the Anatolian farmers migrated to Europe. Since haplogroup R is Siberian, perhaps this subclade migrated around the Black Sea into the Middle East, and from there it spread into Africa with farming. Perhaps it would help explain the Chaoskampf myth pattern that is observed most often in people of Ancient North Eurasian ancestry, but also in the Middle East and Egypt.
I am Kurd and I have r1b - p297
Nothing was found on the Balkan. Just cheap fairy tales to blind people and talk them out of believing that God exists.
R1b in west Africa Came from Arabs
@@NubiansNapata No. Arabs are not black.
Are the people in Africa's R1b European? (R1b-V88). NO! They are autochthone Africans but with recent Eurasian admixture,
recent ? haahaha
@@f.el.h637 West Asian, the migration back from Mongolia is assumed therefore not relevant, R1b-v88 may have never left the Levant before migrating westwards and later north again into Europe, We should be talking about Afro-Asiatic genes going into Europe via Spain instead.
I've listened to several Tishkoff lectures and she clearly says the Mbuti and Khoisan populations are genetically most diverse , which would be central and southwest Africa. That said, it's possible Jebel Irhoud was an earlier lineage that diverged before the A00 haplogroup. Would love to know the DNA from Jebel Irhoud...
What do you specifically want to know about the DNA?
@@kalestanforde Thanks for replying. I'm aware of the recent Princeton study using IBDmix, but their Neanderthal DNA findings were only generalizable to the populations studied. I have a few questions if you don't mind. 1) Do any African populations exhibit zero Neanderthal DNA; 2) How is it known the defining mutation for haplogroup A is older than the defining mutation for haplogroup B; 3) Some argue that haplogroup B is not descended from haplogroup A, and the two evolved separately. Aside from mutation ages is there any genetic evidence proving haplogroup B/BT descends from haplogroup A/A1b?
These questions derive from work published in part by Anatole Klyosov and Ulfur Arnason who contest an OOA origin. Please refer to "The unidirectional phylogeny of Homo sapiens anchors the origin of modern humans in Eurasia" and their subsequent papers for specific arguments. Thanks so much for your time.
I'm mixed African American and White so I'm a little of both European and African DNA 🧬
🤺☦🇷🇺That is such bs😅You making up migration theories just so it will fit your false narrative of only one common ancestor who came from Africa - wrong. The R1b Chadics are natives of Africa just like the others🤦♂️😂
The "out of Africa" model is a false interpretation of the genetic data. There were 3 identical y-mrcas for us all, not just one, and modern science haven't figured it out yet. This is the true division of the y-dna tree:
NOAH (Y-MRCA)
|
HAM ---- SHEM -- JAPHET
(ymrca)(ymrca)(ymrca)x3
|
HAM = A00/A0:
Cush
(A00/A0)-->(AB)»»
(A/B/R1b-v88/E3a/E3b1-v32/L)
Mitsrayim
(A00/A0)-->(E)»»
(E3b1-v12/E-v13/T)
Put
(A00/A0)-->(E)»»
(E3b2)
Canaan
(A00/A0)-->(E1b)»»
(E1b1a1,E1b1b1b)
SHEM = BCDEF:
Elam
(BCDEF)-->(J)»»
(J2)
Arpaxshad
(BCDEF)-->(CDEF)»»
(CF/D/G/H/IJK/M/NO-O/P/Q/S)
Ashur
(BCDEF)-->(J)»»
(J1a)
Lud
(BCDEF)-->(G)»»
(G1)
Aram
(BCDEF)-->(G)»»
(G2)
JAPHET = IJKLT
Gomer
(IJKLT)-->(k)»»
(N3/R1b/R1b)
Magog
(IJKLT)-->(I)»»
(I1)
Javan
(IJKLT)-->(J/J2)»»
(J2a/J2a/J2a/J2b)
Tiras
(IJKLT)-->(I)»»
(I2)
Tubal
(IJKLT)-->(J2)»»
(J2f)
Meshech
(IJKLT)-->(R)»»
(R1a-z283)
Madai
(IJKLT)-->(R)»»
(R2, R1, R1a-Z93)
whats the origin og the Niger congo speakers, i mean, the " negroid phenotype''? It is that old?
I am R-V88 from sephardic jewish origin. My Y FULL DNA is R-V88 (Portugal/Brazil) and mt-DNA X3a1 from sephardic jewish origin, too.
Interesting, your ancestors must have intermingled with the Proto-semitic people carrying Haplogroups E1B1*.
@@secondexodus9105
You don't know that. He didn't say that he also possess DNA from haplogroup E1b1.
@@Kolesha the Proto-semitic people had Haplogroups E1B1*...his Indo-European or Caucasian ancestors carrying Haplogroups R must have dwelled among the tents ⛺ of Shem
Tu es de religion juive mais tu n'es pas hébreu tes ancêtres sont des convertis européens ils ne sont pas des sémites
This so weird in N Africa meanwhile this european R1B is rare
Yes, the Harvard group has an interesting theory that I was initially attracted by, but I don't think there's much evidence of R1b haplogroups being of SW Asian origin. The evidence is clear that R1b has a very old presence in Europe, and last time I checked, the immediate predecessor haplogroup of V88 is found in Eastern Europe where various subclades of R1b originated - is this still accepted? My understanding is that further back, R itself originated somewhere between central Asia, western Siberia, and the fringes of eastern Europe. I do not buy that it originated in Ma'lta, despite the earliest known sample.
Remember that the Masai are cattle herders, and the original cattle herders were from SWAsia (Anotolia to NW India) which is where domesticated cattle also originated. Therefore SW Asia has to be the place where the R1 haplogroup originated, not W Europe.
The universe started from the head of the Aryan Nordic man in the void of supersymmetry
I am curious why you think it didn't originate with the Ancient North Eurasians at Malta-Buret? At the Yana Rhinoceros Site, which predates Malta by thousands of years and is in the vicinity of Malta in Siberia, an even older ancestral clade is found in a population called Ancient North Siberian, who are ancestral to Ancient North Eurasians. The sample recovered was haplogroup P, a clade directly ancestral to both haplogroup R and Q. The haplogrouo Q is currently the dominant group in Native Americans, and we know they also have Ancient North Eurasian ancestry. So in other words, Yana RNS cam be interpreted as being ancestral to both Europeans and Natives. Both haplogroup R and Q. Haplogrouo R does not occur outside central and eastern Siberia until much later. All evidence points to Siberia as being the origin point of haplogroup R, and its subclades likely originating in related groups.
@@jonswap9097 the original cattle herders were from the pontic steppe, not SW Asia. And R1b also comes from the pontic steppe, not west Asia.
@@jonswap9097 Nonsense because all African cattle were domesticated in the Green Sahara from African Auroch these cattle are genetically distinct from Asian Aurochs. Different lineages of cattle. Cattle domestication was done by Y dna e1b1b Africans independently. R-V88 were Hunter-Gatherers from Europe. Steppes people carried R1b but Anatolians didn't so did they go to Africa using Ethiopian Airline? They came from Europe.
Am R1B R-V88 berber from south tunisia and proud ! 🇹🇳
Then u are from the line of Esau.
I Can that the r1b-v88 is connected to the Tuareg people of Libya 🇱🇾👍 and it also found among the indigenous inhabitants of the Sahara desert
@@simonsays2774who is that?
@@Football-ko1jii am from oasis
We don't know half or what you say or draw on the map. First of all R did not originate in Siberia but almost certainly in South Asia (where R2 abounds, and also the precursor of R and Q: P1) or less likely in West Asia (where R1a and R1b, as well as their cousin Q, originated). It's certain that R1b migrated from West Asia both to Africa and Europe but we know that R1b was present in Europe as early as the Epipaleolithic (Villabruna), so to this day is unclear if European R1b was co-opted by farmers after ariival (as happened with I2 as well) or was brought anew with the Neolithic migrants.
Even less clear is what happened in Africa, because it's a different branch (V88), however it is also present and quite diverse in Sardinia and Italy (but almost unheard of in Iberia or otherwise in Western Europe), so V88 is likely to have been carried by farmers from West Asia. However they did not arrive to Africa the way you said but almost certainly via Sudan (where both R1b and I2 are surprisingly abundant), from where they spread as pastoralists to the Chad region, where founder effects probably amplified the impact of the patrilineage.
So, sorry but I have to thumbs down: way too many fantasies and a very mixed bag with data.
@@ario4795 - I thought it was R* but in any case... so what? How many ancient samples we have from Southern Asia? There's an intrinsic bias in ancient DNA research in favor of colder latitudes, for reasons of preservation. This bias must be acknowledged and accounted for and balancing must be done from other data, be it archaeological (which establishes the factual "pecking order" of human expansion in Asia-plus) or from modern DNA (which is a complementary source of infor and IMNSHO can and should be used to trace the routes taken by our ancestors in their epic and millenarian journeys).
Both these complementary sources very strongly suggest that Y-DNA P originated in Sundaland (modern Malaysia and West Indonesia, cf. Karafet) and that P1 (back-)migrated westwards across Northern India and Pakistan, leaving a trail (P* in Bengal-Bihar, R2 across India, incorporation of South Asian IJ and T, etc.) The same story is told by mtDNA (N/R and M1), adding some uncertainties because mtDNA evolves much slower than Y-DNA so the fine detail is lost. Archaeology also strongly tells us that there was first a migration into "the Indies" (tropical and subtropical Asia east of Iran) c. 100-90 Ka BP (with previous stage in Arabia and Palestine since c. 125 Ka BP) and, separately (intermediate stages are poorly studied yet), that the West Eurasian colonization was a single massive wave c. 50 Ka BP involving West Asia (core region, maybe also including southern Central Asia), Europe, Central Asia (incl. parts of Siberia) and NE Africa (where another matrilocal admiture happened with the natives, incorporating Y-DNA E1b to the West Eurasian genetic pool most notably, also some lesser L(M,N) mtDNA lineages). This last is the early Upper Paleolithic and the former is Middle Paleolithic of various types but quite notably Aterian and Nubian techno-cultures very clearly in India and persisting across the Toba ashes (cf. Petragila).
It's like questioning the truth of ooa's theory. how many samples were taken from the rest of the earth?
you just don't want if R comes from Siberia though P and R basal even the oldest Q found there.
@@wftvtfrctyhrtd - Again, the problem is exactly what you mention: "how many samples were taken from the rest of the earth?" Or, in this case, from ancient West and South Asia? None: we have some West Asian ancient samples only from the Neolithic and South Asian ancient DNA is almost non-existent altogether. That's a bias of researchers, a problem of state introduced barriers and difficulties to prehistoric research (India especially has not been very collaborative), a problem of wars (before the civil war, Syria was one of the most productive countries in the region in terms both archaeological and archaeogenetic) and a problem of preservation (the hotter the climate, the worse DNA is preserved).
So what I say is that it's only natural that we have many early derived branches in Siberia, because it's cold, has always been cold, and, before this very year Russia was very accessible to research. That doesn't mean that people originated there but that branches from further south arrived there and left remains that we haven been able to find and analyze successfully. It's an intrinsic bias we must beware of.
@@LuisAldamiz Approximately 47,000-50,000 years ago，K enter South Asia，they split into K2 and LT，K1a/L stay in South Asia，K1b/T enter West Asia，K2 enter Indochina
Human presence in Southeast Asia dates back to at least 40,000 years ago, when the current islands formed a continental shelf called Sundaland. In the Philippine Islands, Peninsular Malaysia, and Andaman Islands, there exist indigenous groups collectively called Negritos whose ancestry can be traced to the “First Sundaland People” K2，They split into K2a and K2b...
1，K2b1 (M,S) → went south mixed with local Denisovan, and became Papuan peoples, Melanesians, Australian Aborigines, Polynesians
2，Y dna K2b2 (Q,R) ，P1 through Indochina/Sunda Shelf→Northern China/Tianyuan Cave→Siberia，they split into Q and R（about 30,000 years ago）
3，Y dna K2a-M2313 (N,O) stay in Indochina，NO enter South China，they split into N and O，Then , N1a enter Siberia（about 10,000-15,000 years ago）and Northeast Europe
O has two primary branches: O1 and O2
O1 enter Indochina through South China→Baiyue，Austronesian，Mon-Khmer，Tai-Kadai，Japanese Korean aborigines
@@夜行者-s2x You may mean K2, not K, which also includes K1 (IJ and LT essentially), which coalesced in South Asia. Both descend from F (also coalesced in South Asia, unlike its "brother" C, which seems more oriental), which also includes H (typical Souh Asian) and G (a bit more mysterious but I'd say that derived from some lesser ancient South Asian clade whose trail we have not found).
In general F all the way to K seems to have coalesced in South Asia but K2 migrated eastwards, where it may have put pressure on C and D, displacing them outwards from the more fertile regions of SE Asia, there split between K2a (N and O), which headed to the north or stayed in Indochina and K2b (incl. P, M and S), which seems to have coalesced in Sundaland and sent branches to Australasia (M and S) and westwards back into South and West Asia (P1).
The key point of disagreement among us seems to be that you force P1 to go through North Asia in a time when it was almost deserted of modern humans, and not accounting for related developments like the westward expansion of associated mtDNA (which left a trail in South Asia, notably R subclades but also some of the N(xR) variant), or the Y-DNA P1 trail it also clearly left there (notably P1* and R2 but maybe even R1 coalesced in the subcontinent, judging on the available data, R1b and R1a however seem from West Asia already.
Another key indication is that in their back-migration westwards that population incorporated some South Asian patrilineages, notably IJ and T (but not L for whatever random reason), as well as some H (somewhat common in European Paleolithic ancient DNA) but not a single bit of South Asian mtDNA. Therefore they must have been matrilocal, which is also confirmed by the gender-unequal admixture pattern in or near Egypt. This is very unlike the patterns we observe in the two clear Paleolithic Siberian expansions, that of proto-Amerinds first and Uralics later: these show very marked patrilocality instead, retaining most of their ancestral Y-DNA but incorporating very large amounts of mtDNA from where they found other peoples.
I must also add, even if it may be less obviously supportive of what I say, that they also carried some Y-DNA C with them, leaving a trail of C5 in South Asia and of som C1 (distantly related to Japanese C1) in (again) the Paleolithic European ancient DNA data set.
Don't just look at the Y-DNA and don't just (please!) accept that findings in Siberia mean automatically origin in Siberia. Siberia is just a freezer that preserves DNA better than in other places, especially the tropical and subtropical landscape that our ancestors favored originally.
Interesting Video! I’m gonna check out more.
I was wondering when it comes to Africa and the eldest race have you heard that they have the most diverse DNA with the black woman having the most dominant genes if they are the 1st race on this planet does that mean all life started in Africa before gene modification where than we began to expand and separate?
🤺☦🇷🇺That is such bs😅You making up migration theories just so it will fit your false narrative of only one common ancestor who came from Africa - wrong. The R1b Chadics are natives of Africa just like the others🤦♂️😂
The "out of Africa" model is a false interpretation of the genetic data. There were 3 identical y-mrcas for us all, not just one, and modern science haven't figured it out yet. This is the true division of the y-dna tree:
NOAH (Y-MRCA)
|
HAM ---- SHEM -- JAPHET
(ymrca)(ymrca)(ymrca)x3
|
HAM = A00/A0:
Cush
(A00/A0)-->(AB)»»
(A/B/R1b-v88/E3a/E3b1-v32/L)
Mitsrayim
(A00/A0)-->(E)»»
(E3b1-v12/E-v13/T)
Put
(A00/A0)-->(E)»»
(E3b2)
Canaan
(A00/A0)-->(E1b)»»
(E1b1a1,E1b1b1b)
SHEM = BCDEF:
Elam
(BCDEF)-->(J)»»
(J2)
Arpaxshad
(BCDEF)-->(CDEF)»»
(CF/D/G/H/IJK/M/NO-O/P/Q/S)
Ashur
(BCDEF)-->(J)»»
(J1a)
Lud
(BCDEF)-->(G)»»
(G1)
Aram
(BCDEF)-->(G)»»
(G2)
JAPHET = IJKLT
Gomer
(IJKLT)-->(k)»»
(N3/R1b/R1b)
Magog
(IJKLT)-->(I)»»
(I1)
Javan
(IJKLT)-->(J/J2)»»
(J2a/J2a/J2a/J2b)
Tiras
(IJKLT)-->(I)»»
(I2)
Tubal
(IJKLT)-->(J2)»»
(J2f)
Meshech
(IJKLT)-->(R)»»
(R1a-z283)
Madai
(IJKLT)-->(R)»»
(R2, R1, R1a-Z93)
R1b in Europeans is clustered in archaic populations like Euskadi. It’s not particularly surprising to find it in subSaharan African populations because it’s very old and the European and African populations are both descendants of an older population that lived in the Sahara before it became desertified.
R1b entered the Chadian gene pool during Baggarization. Baggara Arabs spoke Arabic, not Chadic, implying that people carrying R1b-V88 were not responsible for the spread of Chadic languages, which may have spread approximately 3,700 years ago. We found no evidence for migration of Near Eastern farmers or any ancient episodes involving Eurasian backflow.
@@Jordi_Llopis_i_Torregrosa96 it’s the basic theory of human diaspora, Einstein. The archaeology indicates its soundness. What do you propose, ancient aliens?
No. We have no relationship
no ..we do not...but our ancestors did feed you in the same way we are forced to feed you today in our countries
@@zokavulin Absolute nonsense u Slavic melt.. who are slavs feeding? U lot have been slaves for most part of history.. r1b in the region is from Arabs not Europeans
@@zokavulin what does this have to do with this tolpic-- dimwit low IQ guy this is not about feeding people.
@@zokavulinok neanderthal 🙄
Mlionea they not like us
I'm Black American and my ydna haplogroup is R1b
You may belong to R1b-V88.
Here in America we're all mixed so all bets are off. I Know white guys who have sub Saharan YDNA from hundreds of years ago...and you may have a male European lineage. But it's all very interesting indeed.
@@garyhighley9022 color is just a racial construct. Understanding Genetics helps people understand how we are all human. Interestingly the 3 major Haplogroups of AB, DE, and CF*(GHIJKLMNOPQRST) looks similar to Ham, Shem, and Japheth respectively
@Gary Highley most white people don't have African dna but you Africans do have west Eurasian dna aka white people dna
@@secondexodus9105 race is vary real thing
R1b is from Asia and is not native to Europe.
lake baikal ....
Yes F haplogroup originates in Indian subcontinent . 90% of all non African males have link to F haplogroup .
Still Caucsiod
@@akhripasta2670not true
@@famitsus987 There are native africans in central Africa with R1b
Just "The Sahara", not "The Sahara Desert". "Sahara" means "desert". On the subject matter, there has to be another explanation, one that also gives a genetic perspective from the point of mutations. Ninety two percent of Norwegians cluster in Ethiopian haplotypes. But that does not say much.
Yes he is right Sahara does not mean desert ,desert mean hamada , so in Hausa Sahara desert translate to Hamada’s sahara
Perfect video
👍👍👍👍😊
Very good video
this video is extremely well edited and researched. i’d like to point out at 2:13 the map showering berbers has a spot in chad, however no berbers live in chad.
🤺☦🇷🇺That is such bs😅You making up migration theories just so it will fit your false narrative of only one common ancestor who came from Africa - wrong. The R1b Chadics are natives of Africa just like the others🤦♂️😂
The "out of Africa" model is a false interpretation of the genetic data. There were 3 identical y-mrcas for us all, not just one, and modern science haven't figured it out yet. This is the true division of the y-dna tree:
NOAH (Y-MRCA)
|
HAM ---- SHEM -- JAPHET
(ymrca)(ymrca)(ymrca)x3
|
HAM = A00/A0:
Cush
(A00/A0)-->(AB)»»
(A/B/R1b-v88/E3a/E3b1-v32/L)
Mitsrayim
(A00/A0)-->(E)»»
(E3b1-v12/E-v13/T)
Put
(A00/A0)-->(E)»»
(E3b2)
Canaan
(A00/A0)-->(E1b)»»
(E1b1a1,E1b1b1b)
SHEM = BCDEF:
Elam
(BCDEF)-->(J)»»
(J2)
Arpaxshad
(BCDEF)-->(CDEF)»»
(CF/D/G/H/IJK/M/NO-O/P/Q/S)
Ashur
(BCDEF)-->(J)»»
(J1a)
Lud
(BCDEF)-->(G)»»
(G1)
Aram
(BCDEF)-->(G)»»
(G2)
JAPHET = IJKLT
Gomer
(IJKLT)-->(k)»»
(N3/R1b/R1b)
Magog
(IJKLT)-->(I)»»
(I1)
Javan
(IJKLT)-->(J/J2)»»
(J2a/J2a/J2a/J2b)
Tiras
(IJKLT)-->(I)»»
(I2)
Tubal
(IJKLT)-->(J2)»»
(J2f)
Meshech
(IJKLT)-->(R)»»
(R1a-z283)
Madai
(IJKLT)-->(R)»»
(R2, R1, R1a-Z93)
This interesting video reminds me some stories in Bible, Qur'an, and some other ancient texts...
Would you suggest me some books and papers used as references for this video?
Interestingly the 3 major Haplogroups of AB, DE, and CF*(GHIJKLMNOPQRST) looks similar to Ham, Shem, and Japheth respectively
@@secondexodus9105 💀
This is very informative knowledge concerning European ( haplotypes) connection to Africa. Mitochondrial DNA is a game changer !!!
please translate all into Portuguese Brazil is very important because we Brazilians are the most missigenated people in the world.. I have 9 European nations. German. Dutch. French. Irish. Scottish. Welsh. Italian .Ukrainian. Portuguese. Nigerian.Kenya.West Africa. mbuti congo. mandé .seneganbia .is Mesoamerican Andean Central and South America
Brazil is one of the most diverse countries on the planet.
But what if it is the case that R1b came to Europe from Central Africa instead of R1b coming to Central Africa from Europe?
The Sahara was green and the Mediterranean shoreline was completely different. There must of been a land route from s.europe into the green sahara.
Especially if they claim human life startedbthere
Nope.
1 R1b didn’t came to Africa from Europe.
2 The variety of Europe is diferent.
@@jbrown8601 morocco and spain is 14 km away from each other in the closest point at the strait of gibraltef
I came from the middle east into north africa and then spread southward
I have r1b v88. 98% of my dna is Celtic-Germanic . I have less than 1% of DNA that is considered “sub Saharan “. My paternal lineage that has this DNA come from Malta.
Thanks for making this video. Where did you get the geojson files you've used in this video? Are they open source?
R1b그룹이 유럽보다 아프리카에 더 우세한거죠? 지난번 영상에서 러시아, 중앙아시아의 R에서 파생된 r1a는 주로 유럽으로, r1b는 아프리카로 갔다고 본 것 같은데, 제가 이해 한것이 맞나 모르겠네요....r1b V88 SNP가 우세하다고 해서 30프로 정도 나오나 싶었는데, 90프로 나오는 곳도 있다고 하니 진짜 인종을 구별하는데 중요한 마커인듯 합니다. 초승달 지역은 지도상 보면 성경의 가나안땅 듯합니다. 젖과 꿀이 흐른다는 비옥하고 환경이 좋은 땅~~언제나 좋은 영상 재미있게 보고 있습니다. 엄청난 수고와 열정이 느껴집니다^^
R1b는 주로 오늘날 서유럽인들이지만, R1b 브랜치중에 일부인 V88이 아프리카로 갔습니다. 차드 지역 아프리카인에게서도 R1b-V88이 많이 발견됩니다.
내 가설은 Haplogroup E1B1* 보인자가 유전적으로 셈족이거나 Shem의 후손이라는 것입니다. Haplogroups CF*(GHIJKLMNOPQRST)의 보균자인 사람들은 야벳의 후손입니다.
그리고 성경의 함의 후예인 사람들은 아프리카 대륙의 원주민인 AB의 Haplogroups를 가질 것입니다.
Maybe you should read a bit more than what you have. Canaan was Hams son, so that area would belong to a black group of people similar to Somalians or Fulanies
@@geonomad1 Maybe the same way the other Invaders invaded so-called Middle East.
Agriculture started in Syria
Not in Anatolia
From Syria spread to Anatolia
Mesopotamia including Eastern Syria, part of Iraq and Turkey.
@@Dani-wc9cu
He's talking about Anatolia.
Gioiello Tognoni demonstrated more than 10 years ago, against all, that R-V88 was born in Europe and not in Middle East as all thought, and that is proved from aDNA now.
Sylvain, ask the Harvardians, the theorists of the "Southern arc theory", how many hg. R1b they found in aDNA in Middle East older than those found in Europe beginning from Villabruna, Italy, 14000 ybp.
What about E-M4451 ?
There is a weird insistence in academic archeology today that everything originated out of africa, and nothing ever came back in.
We have several dna samples in europe with dna for light skin, and one dna example without the dna for light skin. So automatically we say that there could've been darker skinned people living with the lighter skinned people, but if they dark skin, than it's not possible for lighter skinned people to exist along side them. If one is dark skinned they're all dark skinned. If some are light skinned, there is likely dark skinned there as well, we just haven't found it yet. And no, it's not possible for the one dark skin to be an outlyer. We found a dark skin so they're all dark skin. That's how science works. What a joke... ha, ha....
@@liteneyIt's about environment. It's easy to survive in Europe with dark skin; all one needs is a diet rich in Vitamin D. However, it's not easy to survive in Africa with light skin, because the intense UV radiation of the Sun can induce skin cancer and folate-depletion in light skin, especially near the equator.
@@SaintFort So you're saying ancient light skinned people didn't exist in africa? Because they did, regardless if you like it or not. That's like saying people who have dna that's not the norm wouldn't exist, as it would've been evolved out of them. That's not science, and you're burying the lead. We're talking about Europe, not Africa. If they find an ancient human with light skinned dna in Europe, they claim there has to be dark skinned people there as well, we just haven't found them yet. Where as if they find an ancient human with dark skinned dna, they claim they were all dark skinned people. That's not science. That's racist.
How are you saying a group from is somehow “ European “?
Hopefully if you talking about the concentration of haplogroup G and how got it spread from mesopotamia to reach the Caucasian region .
Your videos really interesting. Thank you.
Thank You. You can refer to the Haplogroup G video.
🤺☦🇷🇺That is such bs😅You making up migration theories just so it will fit your false narrative of only one common ancestor who came from Africa - wrong. The R1b Chadics are natives of Africa just like the others🤦♂️😂
The "out of Africa" model is a false interpretation of the genetic data. There were 3 identical y-mrcas for us all, not just one, and modern science haven't figured it out yet. This is the true division of the y-dna tree:
NOAH (Y-MRCA)
|
HAM ---- SHEM -- JAPHET
(ymrca)(ymrca)(ymrca)x3
|
HAM = A00/A0:
Cush
(A00/A0)-->(AB)»»
(A/B/R1b-v88/E3a/E3b1-v32/L)
Mitsrayim
(A00/A0)-->(E)»»
(E3b1-v12/E-v13/T)
Put
(A00/A0)-->(E)»»
(E3b2)
Canaan
(A00/A0)-->(E1b)»»
(E1b1a1,E1b1b1b)
SHEM = BCDEF:
Elam
(BCDEF)-->(J)»»
(J2)
Arpaxshad
(BCDEF)-->(CDEF)»»
(CF/D/G/H/IJK/M/NO-O/P/Q/S)
Ashur
(BCDEF)-->(J)»»
(J1a)
Lud
(BCDEF)-->(G)»»
(G1)
Aram
(BCDEF)-->(G)»»
(G2)
JAPHET = IJKLT
Gomer
(IJKLT)-->(k)»»
(N3/R1b/R1b)
Magog
(IJKLT)-->(I)»»
(I1)
Javan
(IJKLT)-->(J/J2)»»
(J2a/J2a/J2a/J2b)
Tiras
(IJKLT)-->(I)»»
(I2)
Tubal
(IJKLT)-->(J2)»»
(J2f)
Meshech
(IJKLT)-->(R)»»
(R1a-z283)
Madai
(IJKLT)-->(R)»»
(R2, R1, R1a-Z93)
Something is wrong. R1b was already present in Europe much before, there are eastern gravettians and epigravettians who were R1b in the middle of upper paleolithic.
My Paternal Haplogroup is E-M4451
One of the things we never explore in these videos is the transformation of dark skinned humans who are the aboriginal peoples of all continents into the people we see today throughout Europe, Asia, and mostly in the Americas who are not Africoid. These stories into the genetic diversity doesn’t neatly square into both archaeological evidence, as well as many of the forensic evidence we find in cultural references. We are likely missing a exciting chapter of our humans story, merely looking at such a myopic view and thinking it is the complete story.
That way, surprises of finding a “European“ gene inside of the African continent could be explained by connecting the aboriginal Europeans in the north, who likely initially had Africa white features that then got spread to later populations, who migrated there afterwards. Investigating this will also prevent us from applying today’s Geo political realities to history that tends to hide or even disparage the realities that these areas were once populated by different races of people. This is likely the case of populations throughout northern east Africa, to the entirety of the Arabian peninsula towards the civilizations of the Fertile Crescent, as well as the Indus valley, given other videos, which expressed key parts, showing that the oldest human populations have by far the greatest level of phenotypical differences as well as genetic variations, it makes sense that those jeans would find themselves in populations that today look nothing like the progenitor phenotypes.
dude...from nazlet khater (egypt ) to hofmeyer skull (SA) europeans are down there for now 40 000 years
asselar man (you) is only 7 000
Correct, what is considered.modern African or European can not be transposed on to the ancient past. North Africa plus Arabia was a hotspot of human activity and maybe even the birthplace of humanity.
Claim it european to the R1b? when it entered in Africa, it wasnt even present in Europe.
@@adamnesico dude R1b V88 it came from the balkan
and R1b is in Europe for now 15 000 years
@@sensei2353 and you have that from cnn?
the fossils are what they are ..there is no room for changing it
These are the same groups mostly with RH- blood being common, Basques, Berbers and Celts, the native people of the Atlantic shores.
No they're not.. CHADIC R1b came from Arabs.
*Are the people in Europe with R1B Africans?*
No the r1b haplogrouo just traveled around everywhere and left their DNA wherever they went north Africa used to be much more habitable than it is today and it was easy to go there even preferable to other places it only became a desert relatively recently on a large timescale for a while EVERYONE wanted to go there
@@UpperNileGuy R1b entered the Chadian gene pool during Baggarization. Baggara Arabs spoke Arabic, not Chadic, implying that people carrying R1b-V88 were not responsible for the spread of Chadic languages, which may have spread approximately 3,700 years ago. We found no evidence for migration of Near Eastern farmers or any ancient episodes involving Eurasian backflow.
@@UpperNileGuy r1b is rare in north Africa, north Africans including myself are mostly E1b1b and J 1 and J 2
Yo that clone story got old a long time ago back in the 70s
Haplogroup rb1 come from central Asia or Siberia. Tchad have central Asian haplogroup
R1b is highest in Europe also centre Asian natives are Caucsiod white
@@famitsus987we waz central Asians
I think v88 migrated from europe via the sea
I think people have to really understand that haplogroups for the most part don't mean genetic makeup as we think today.
There are some white people who have E1B1A ( not a lot) but the issue is that people have to understand that a haplogroup being "european" in origin does not mean that the origins of that haplogroup population are the same people of today.
What it means is a single male won the genetic lottery. r1b is 20, 000 years old.
The europeans that we see today had an african ancestor that migrated to eurpe and formed subclades. Some traveled back to africa, some kept moving through europe. Therefore the genes will return to africa and dispersed in europe.
For example that people can understand.....
If 100 people in a Nigerian village left and went to the UK, then they marry each other's daughters and sons off, the offspring will form a subgroup or subclade due to concentrated breeding. ( The recessive genes will be very dormant and the dominant genes will be very expressive which formed that new subgroup.)
We'll call this new subgroup N1B. It will be a European ORIGIN haplogroup originating in the UK.
The males will now carry this lineage. If some of the males return to Nigeria and have children with local women, Then those males will still carry haplogroup N1B.
If the ones that stayed in the Uk have children with women in the uk, those males will still carry N1B. Thus sharing a common male ancestor. If the sons marry white women in the Uk and their sons do the same, Then you will have white Uk populations with N1B (if it becomes dominant) and black populations in nigeria with N1B.
An african ancestor?
Who?
R1b didn’t originated in Africa.
Maybe you mean the E1b1b father of the europeans who carry it.
My 👊🏿😅, see hein the problem is that Europeans want to connection to Africa , hence a subclade is formed for those that returned to Africa but the one in Europe remains the same … R1B V88 for the African one 😂… I’ll tell you the problem , see hein the Roman Empire had so many black soldiers and these men fathered so many children across the western coast of Europe hence the Y chromosome is still there as well as in Africa in high concentrations. But because they don’t like to admit to common sense then stories are created .. But really they absorbed our kingship and our ways and then resented us till today… Which is why the message of slavery regarding African people has been the only message in the history books 😅, you see the deception all to take peoples attention from the real truth or truths
Africa is a most diverse continent on the face of the Earth. It is not surprising that the DNA comes from there and not anywhere else.
That dna did not speared in Africa.
Yr racist mind can’t tolerate the idea if have non african ascendancy?
@@sensei2353 that’s like say that because men apeared in Africa, inuit had to apear in Africa.
Or you simply mean thst the far ancestors of those haplogroups eere from Africa?
Yes. Still, haplogroup R didn’t apeared in Africa.
@@adamnesico it’s factual that humans emerged from Africa Lmao don’t be mad now
@@Yrkr785 yes, but each race is the adaptation to a different place.
@@adamnesico I'm racist for speaking the truth?
This video is quite interesting, my maternal line is Hausa/Fulani. The Hausas are indigenous to Northern Nigeria (Hausaland), and originated from Nigeria (Hausa Bakwai) where 90% of the Hausas allover the world live in their villages, and cities. How come the R1b is found in Europe, except they migrated there and not the other way round.
The first humans came out of Africa so it’s not surprised. I highly doubt that they came from Europe to Africa but the other way round. From African into Europe based on historical records. Hopefully you will make a video of the genocide skeletons still at the chad desert 🇬🇲🇬🇲
R1B in Africa came from Arabs
@@NubiansNapata so your saying it's from R1B is Arab but the problem today's Arabs are not one people they are arabicised Arabs
If you study the deep history of the Arabs from Arab literature they will admit that today's Arabs arab because their ancestors of different backgrounds took on Arab culture and language and so became part of the the original ethnic Arab group .
The original Arab group look like Africans and are originally part of a mixture of kushite peoples and the kushite themselves are a mix of many different African tribes of old
@@NubiansNapata R1b in Africa came from African, m0r0n lol
@@Samba652 No, they weren't, you are an ignorant afrocentric. Yes, most Arabs are Arabized peoples, but the original Arabs are the Ishmaelite tribes of Arabia and the Levant - descendants of Abraham and his brother, cousins of the Jews, and todays majority population of Arabia. They all carry haplogroup J1e. They belong to the Semitic race, while Cushites belong to the Hamitic race, which also includes the so called Natufians, who are nothing but the first Canaanites (no, geniuses, they were only linguistically Semitic, not genetically, so don't start with that again lol)
@@Samba652 nonsense. from a genetic point of view
Actually this one can explain quite a few things.
I love this information. It is a common Gael Haplogroup as well. Cynthia Allen McLaglen
🤺☦🇷🇺That is such bs😅You making up migration theories just so it will fit your false narrative of only one common ancestor who came from Africa - wrong. The R1b Chadics are natives of Africa just like the others🤦♂️😂
The "out of Africa" model is a false interpretation of the genetic data. There were 3 identical y-mrcas for us all, not just one, and modern science haven't figured it out yet. This is the true division of the y-dna tree:
NOAH (Y-MRCA)
|
HAM ---- SHEM -- JAPHET
(ymrca)(ymrca)(ymrca)x3
|
HAM = A00/A0:
Cush
(A00/A0)-->(AB)»»
(A/B/R1b-v88/E3a/E3b1-v32/L)
Mitsrayim
(A00/A0)-->(E)»»
(E3b1-v12/E-v13/T)
Put
(A00/A0)-->(E)»»
(E3b2)
Canaan
(A00/A0)-->(E1b)»»
(E1b1a1,E1b1b1b)
SHEM = BCDEF:
Elam
(BCDEF)-->(J)»»
(J2)
Arpaxshad
(BCDEF)-->(CDEF)»»
(CF/D/G/H/IJK/M/NO-O/P/Q/S)
Ashur
(BCDEF)-->(J)»»
(J1a)
Lud
(BCDEF)-->(G)»»
(G1)
Aram
(BCDEF)-->(G)»»
(G2)
JAPHET = IJKLT
Gomer
(IJKLT)-->(k)»»
(N3/R1b/R1b)
Magog
(IJKLT)-->(I)»»
(I1)
Javan
(IJKLT)-->(J/J2)»»
(J2a/J2a/J2a/J2b)
Tiras
(IJKLT)-->(I)»»
(I2)
Tubal
(IJKLT)-->(J2)»»
(J2f)
Meshech
(IJKLT)-->(R)»»
(R1a-z283)
Madai
(IJKLT)-->(R)»»
(R2, R1, R1a-Z93)
the autor: "Chad was a mega chad".
GigaChad: ** just looking**.
Since men and women migrate together, wouldn't consistent pattern of a haplotype in the (male) Y chromosome be matched by consistent pattern of a haplotype in (female) mitochondrial DNA? And wouldn't a mismatch indicate that something is very wrong?
Here they talk about the male haplotype, but say nothing about the female. How can that be?
You should have been more aware of deep darkness of humanity
Y-dna migrations didnt always bring mtdna haplogroups of their kin with it, especially in the case of indo-european expansions which was nearly entirely paternally mediated, These were young men that had left their tribe and were expanding into the world, Look up the koryos.
What are the blood types. Any RH NEGATIVE
Y chromosome doesn't affect blood types.
@@damianscott3710 The genes of these blood group systems are autosomal, except XG and XK which are X-borne, and MIC2 which is present on both X and Y chromosomes. The antigens can be integral proteins where polymorphisms lie in the variation of amino acid sequence (e.g., rhesus [Rh], Kell), glycoproteins or glycolipids (e.g., ABO)
@@billstream1974 Can't women also have RH negative blood type?
I don’t think anyone knows how genes really work. For some reason I look more Greek then most Greeks, more Italian then most Italians and more Egyptian then most Egyptians 🗿🤷🏿♂️🗿
u look nothing like a greek or italian, egyptian or indian maybe the case
@@deadbeat5165 idk I saw a statue of Apollo and Dionysus that look p close
When you are a so called Afro-American, your brain begin to be Damaged quickly.
Somethin just ain't adding up though...when you look on wiki is says they don't have the SOURCE of R haplogroup.
The earliest R is from Siberia. That is Mal'ta Boy who is from 24,000 years ago.
Great information. I’m African American and my paternal haplogroup R1b1a2a.
Then your ancestor didn't came from Africa, like the R1b-v88 which are natives of Africa. 🤺☦🇷🇺That vid is such bs😅They're making up migration theories just so it will fit their false narrative of only one common ancestor who came from Africa - wrong. The R1b Chadics are natives of Africa just like the others🤦♂️😂
The "out of Africa" model is a false interpretation of the genetic data. There were 3 identical y-mrcas for us all, not just one, and modern science haven't figured it out yet. This is the true division of the y-dna tree:
NOAH (Y-MRCA)
|
HAM ---- SHEM -- JAPHET
(ymrca)(ymrca)(ymrca)x3
|
HAM = A00/A0:
Cush
(A00/A0)-->(AB)»»
(A/B/R1b-v88/E3a/E3b1-v32/L)
Mitsrayim
(A00/A0)-->(E)»»
(E3b1-v12/E-v13/T)
Put
(A00/A0)-->(E)»»
(E3b2)
Canaan
(A00/A0)-->(E1b)»»
(E1b1a1,E1b1b1b)
SHEM = BCDEF:
Elam
(BCDEF)-->(J)»»
(J2)
Arpaxshad
(BCDEF)-->(CDEF)»»
(CF/D/G/H/IJK/M/NO-O/P/Q/S)
Ashur
(BCDEF)-->(J)»»
(J1a)
Lud
(BCDEF)-->(G)»»
(G1)
Aram
(BCDEF)-->(G)»»
(G2)
JAPHET = IJKLT
Gomer
(IJKLT)-->(k)»»
(N3/R1b/R1b)
Magog
(IJKLT)-->(I)»»
(I1)
Javan
(IJKLT)-->(J/J2)»»
(J2a/J2a/J2a/J2b)
Tiras
(IJKLT)-->(I)»»
(I2)
Tubal
(IJKLT)-->(J2)»»
(J2f)
Meshech
(IJKLT)-->(R)»»
(R1a-z283)
Madai
(IJKLT)-->(R)»»
(R2, R1, R1a-Z93)
african american generally has lots of white ancestry
@@EasternRomeOrthodoxycope
Then you came paternally from Western Europe.
You're not from Africa.
We don't know who we are or where we came from..,.do we?
For the origins of R1b and R1a we should really look at the Latitude at which Mal'ta Buret and Afontova Gora are found....even the route they travelled would have been approximately at that Latitude. Somewhere between 24 000 and 18 000 years ago. If I remember correctly the Villabruna cluster is estimated to have started to form around that time already....18 000 years ago. My guess is R1b formed somewhere between the Southern Urals, Caucasus and the North Eastern Carpathians...
I'm a Basque, Haplogroup R1b-M167/SRY2627 linked to Celts expanding with the Urnfield culture
@@ATfadf Interesting. I'm R1b L21...
DNA mutation only happened 8000 years ago in Kazakhstan......these people were black Africans...
It's most likely Central Asia. There are multiple R1b subclades that are relatively absent from Europe, but unique to Central Asia.
R1b's age is also 23,000 years old, and the oldest rooted R1b, older than all the rest INCLUDING Villabruna, comes from Uzbekistan. Villabruna is only 14,000 years old
In addition to this, Mal'ta Boy shares a high degree of affinity towards Iranian neolithic people, meaning that there was a migration of Iranian-like DNA into Siberia by 24,000 years ago, which is right around when R1b was about to arise.
How would Iranian DNA get into Lake Baikal? Through Central Asia
@@AKu-xs5vg You forgot about Yana RHS who is much Older and related to Mal'ta and Tianyuan Man.....If there was a migration from Southern Central Asia it had to predate those samples. So I think we have to look at when Ust Ishim man reached Southern Siberia around 45 000 years ago....
Not a fan of the robotic narration
So they migrated from Europe to Africa 😂😂😂😂
It just means Africans migrated as far as euroasian and migrated back
Yeah they make up all kinds of lies. Just ridiculous 😂😂😂
Why do so many countries /people want to associate their heritage with the Fulani people?🤔
Eurocentrists be like: We wuz fathers😂
Where did mitochondrial Eve and ydna Adam come from ?
Maybe they're thinking about how long Neanderthals were around before Homosapiens existed?
@@satanshameer690 Africa obviously.
They are the children of Lilith and Satan 💯
@@asialee8102
Or albinos fleeing from thousands of years of being treated like animals in Africa?
And thousands of years of being sold as slaves in Africa, from the time the Tower of Bable fell in the Book of Jasher: until the United States Marines fought on the shores of Tripoli in Libya in the 19th century, Europeans and eventually Americans were fleeing slavery, and were commonly sold as slaves in Africa.
Look into it online...
"Like a hunted animal run to ground, the little girl was cornered.
Branded a 'ghost' on account of her striking white skin, Mariam Emmanuel had been chased through her African village, in a remote corner of Tanzania, by a bloodthirsty mob.
Exhausted and terrified, the five-year-old slumped in the dust at the end of an alley. She whimpered and cowered while the adults surrounded her and sharpened their knives and machetes.
Then they set to work, butchering her and dividing up her remains between themselves."
They're worth more if they scream loud and long, so...
'Mariam did not have the benefit of being unconscious before she died,' said one shocked investigator.
'She was killed, like an animal, by grown men who showed no compassion for another human being.'
Mariam's crime? She was an albino, one of more than 17,000 black Africans who suffer from a rare genetic condition that makes their skin white and their hair red or blond.
In many African nations - but most commonly in Tanzania - albinos are butchered in the street.
Their remains are used in the macabre human potions used by traditional healers to treat the sick.
Believing it will bring them good luck and big catches, fishermen on the shores Lake Victoria weave albino hair into nets.
Bones are ground down and buried in the earth by miners, who believe they will be transformed into diamonds. The genitals are made into treatments to bolster sexual potency."
Another very interesting point is that one-third of the Y chromosomes of African Americans come from Western and Northern Europe.
The genetic peer-reviewed research seems unclear whether certain sub-Saharans do not possess Neandertal DNA, and I've heard genealogical reports also confirming certain African individuals show zero Neandertal DNA. Can anyone confirm this finding, and also clarify whether certain African populations likewise show zero Eurasian admixture? Thanks for any assistance on these topics.
It's unclear whether or not Neanderthal genes have been found in people living in sub-Saharan Africa from what I know and know. Sorry for not providing clear information.
@@geonomad1 Hey no problem! I have located some studies where several sub-Saharan populations showed Neandertal ancestry, but the key question is whether these results may be generalized to 'all' sub-Saharan populations. Have you read the peer-reviewed Princeton paper titled, "Identifying and Interpreting Apparent Neanderthal Ancestry in African Individuals"? The study employed a new detection methodology called IBDmix, and based on the populations sampled I was wondering if you believe their findings are generalizable to the entire African population. Would enjoy hearing your thoughts, if possible. Thanks!
i have less than 2% neanderthal and my y group is R1b-P25 so that means the neanderthals intermingled with R1b way down stream and that is more than likely how Europeans turned white because they were originally darker. My family is from Jamaica (west African diaspora) most people in that area with R1b have V88. the separation at around R-M269 reminds me of the story of Esaú and Jacob. V88 (Jacob) did settle in the levant for a time before migrating back to Africa. and his brother went into the caucus mountain region before migrating west (yamnaya) which is interesting
@@jasonborn867 All human populations, who are not modern indigenous hunter gatherers, have Neanderthal, Denisovan or unknown archaic introgression or a mixture.
@@captivesojournerThe last academic paper I read claims that if Neanderthals mated with humans it happened in the Levant/Arabian Peninsula area 50,000 years ago which was before modern humans populated Europe. The original anatomically modern Europeans were dark because they consisted of several direct out of Africa migrations that began over 30,000 years ago.
R1b was a back-migration. It consisted of dark-skinned Africans who left the continent following the herds of animals into Asia. Those same Africans migrated to the Levant and some of them returned home to the African continent. They eventually became pastoralists of the wet Sahara. When the Sahara dried, they were isolated in the south.
Africans have the highest frequency of albinism. My theory is one of the groups of R1b that did not return to Africa were albinos. They migrated to the Caucuses mt. region and settled there for thousands of years. Eventually, the albino trait became fixed, and those light skinned R1b carriers migrated to Europe. Based on models they killed all males who were not R1b and mated with the females.
Much better narration on this one
Fulani have more E than R1b
It is so, so, so, so funny that the narrator is saying that the Africans are Europeans instead of saying that Europeans has the African DNA when it is the origin DNA. And when everybody according to the science are from Africa.
Because you don't understand the video. It's not as clear as what most people think. Yes genes mostly flowed out of Africa but some flowed back into Africa. This particular haplogroup originated out of Africa and moved into Africa. It's really not that complicted
Are you dumb?
Great and informative video, however am surprised you haven't mentioned colonization
Why? Colonization obviously isn’t related to this.
@@adamnesico Colonization would explain a lot to why some Africans have European DNA, just saying
@@woozyz2769 NO
The dna presence then should be everywhere and never in such high %, and less in places with so few colonists.
@@adamnesico according to history it depends on how long the colonists were actually there, some stayed longer than others
@@woozyz2769 yes.
And you know that europeans were in the Sahel less than a century, right?
And the video has in account their known descendants, it haven’t signalized the basters of South Africa.
Wow the comments are way over my knowledge level.
Me too,I need deeper study.
Hello…The fact that a nation carries a haplogroup to a large extent does not mean that the source of that haplogroup is that nation. The important thing is that they carry the oldest genes and have many mutations. Kurds carry the R1b haplogroup, which is the oldest form of the r1b haplogroup. Neolithic farmers in southeast Anatolia carried this gene. Thousands of years ago with cattle herds, R1b spread to the world from southeast anatolia. Not only did it spread to Europe, countries like Chad and Cameroon also carry R1B (v88) almost entirely. The source of haplogroup r1b is the neolithic ancestors of the Kurds.. Kurds still live in those lands.. Kurds are the father of civilization
Nigeria also has more than ten percent West Eurasian maternal mtDNA: V U H haplogroup
I wonder if R1b-V88 is also responsible for Gobekli Tepe and Boncuklu Tarla cultures
No those people are not Europeans! Europeans may have came from them or something along those lines, but nothing about them are white!
Cope
blablabla bla bla R1b is White Indo-European under R1 from Central Asia.
R-V88 is the African clade under R1b that's it.
Watched a bunch of these vids .im not a dna expert was hoping on seeing more on greek dna me being greek. But no help here im curious about the 1000 plus studies on graves from bronze age
Have you heard of a people called #Toubou?
2:53
9:22 missed opportunity to call it giga chad
I am Kurd and R1B - P297
Are you white skintone ? Do you look Italian Greek?
@@Based556 yes
No you are not the ancient egyptians
Cette fois-ci , ce n'est pas l'africain qui est allé en Europe mais le contraire!
This haplogroup R is not European and has no connection to Europe. It entered Europe and came from Asia as invaders and exterminated the original inhabitants of Europe. Haplogroup R is Asian and the ancestors of the Africans who carry this lineage never crossed Europe.
This is proof that haplogroup doesn't identify ethic group, but instead genetic mutation. You claiming they are Europeans because of their mutation but I can argue that Europeans are negro Africans because R1 mutations can be trace backward to them. The Fulani aren't Europeans because modern Europeans have that mutation but instead they are Africans who migrated back to Africa while another group migrated to Europe. This proves that Fulani was the original while those who migrated to Europe became further admixed with the "Europeans".
The primitive Fulani people were members of the Mandelian language family, who lived and grazed around the Niger River. Initially, the Fulani people were E1a, which can be found in places where Fulani people were present. Later, only more Atlantic Congo language speakers, such as E-M2 (E1b1a), were mixed in because they were speakers of the Niger Congo language family and were easily assimilated.
The population of the Chadian language family (Kirdi people) is very exclusive, and the Fulani people dislike them. In the 19th century, the Fulani people launched a holy war to invade their territory, and the Fulani people enslaved their Chadian language family (Kirdi people). The vast majority of the Chadian speaking population are farmers
The truth is that 86% of Fulani people in Cameroon are African patrilineal haplogroups, with the majority being E1a (E-M132), while Fulani people in Sudan are close to 54% R1b.
African is the most genetically diversely continent and the mother land of human genes
They don't want to hear that especially as they again attempt to insert, steal or otherwise modify history to place themselves as being the father of all mankind... Amazing, these people have spent centuries staying as far as possible from anything Negroid, next they will become Haplogroup Adam, A00 which is the goal...They traveled all over exploring and leaving their seed along the way. That's how I see that foreign seed taking hold, not much unlike slavery.
@@itsnomyth144thsnd3 no, now its simply said that A00 is not human and guineans are highly mixed with non humans.
they have same color and look the same
Nah, Africa is predominantly haplogroup E, which only a little bit of R, J, D, A, B.
Eurasia haplogroups are wayyy more diverse than Africa.
@damianscott3710 you can search it up he is correct africa has the most genetic diversity
As a Welshman I am chuffed to Beans to have 'family' in Africa irrespective of Skin Colour. If this truth doesn't destroy Racism I don't know what does. I suppose the R1A lot might get ansi but that's a whole other ball game :-)
R1b haplotype in Africa was introduced by Arabs with west Eurasian ancestry.
@@NubiansNapatano lol also Arabs are west Eurasian
@@NubiansNapataArabs are Haplogroup j which came from the Caucasus
@@famitsus987ok let me post the lastest study of R1B in the region. They found that genetic diversity in Chad was broadly divided by a north-south axis. The core ancestry of Southern Chadians was Central African, most closely related to Pygmies. Southern Chadians then experienced four waves of gene flow over the last 3,000 years from West-Central Africans, Eastern Africans, West-Central Africans again, and then Arabians. In contrast, Northern Chadians did not share Central African ancestry and were not influenced by the first wave of West-Central Africans but were influenced by Northern African ancestry.
found that Y DNA haplogroup R1b entered the Chadian gene pool during Baggarization. Baggara Arabs spoke Arabic, not Chadic, implying that people carrying R1b-V88 were not responsible for the spread of Chadic languages, which may have spread approximately 3,700 years ago. We found no evidence for migration of Near Eastern farmers or any ancient episodes involving Eurasian backflow.
@@famitsus987investigated the genetic history of Chad, in the context of the Sahel as well as in the global context. We did not find evidence of immigration of Near Eastern farmers or ancient Eurasians of any sort. We found that the Y DNA haplogroup R1b correlated with the presence of Arabian and Western Asian ancestries in the Sudanese gene pool. Using autosomal data, we found that Western Asian and Arabian ancestries mixed in the 13th century prior to entering the Sudanese gene pool. We found that Arabian ancestry migrated from east to west, having entered the Sudanese gene pool 20 generations ago, the Chadian gene pool 15 generations ago, and the Cameroonian and Nigerian gene pools 10 generations ago. Linguistic data
DNA mutates. Just remember this humanity as you try to make sense of your true history
R1b comes to Cameroon from Pharaos, Pharaos come from Kyrgyzstan
Don't think so.
😂
@@Dani-wc9cuscience is more tham your thoughts😉
I just don't believe this at all.
because ur brain cant think complex, same like how ur brain can process of how universe phenomenon works,
This is curious ..... R1b is the most common hapla group , in Caucasians all throughout Europe .
Someone please educate me.
How is the origin of these genetic markers proven based on location? How do geneticist prove where the markers originated?
Seems like guess work
Its a theory nothing more nothing less
yea, cause I thought human beings migrated out of Africa but this makes it look like human beings went to Africa lol
The red dots he showed are locations of ancient skeletons found with the haplogroups named. Ancient skeletons compared with modern sample groups is how we know where each comes from.
@@agreedydragon fascinating. I’ve always wondered how geneticist keep track of origins with the endless amount of migrations throughout human history.