That Gripen crash is especially sad as it not only destroyed a beautiful aircraft but also shows that the builder massively underestimated the forces acting on such a large aircraft and built it like many smaller scale planes - out of wood... which is not an issue by itself (see the DH Mosquito), but this thing seemed to be far to fragile to be even airworthy. The fact that the fuselage disintegrated like that shows that this perfectly. And it seems to be made of sections for easier transport, creating even more weak spots.
I couldn’t agree more and condolences to the owner/pilot, however in cockpit videos of the blue angels I’ve seen the highly engineered vertical stabs vibrating like crazy during certain manoeuvres and that design is very strong indeed! Just goes to show the forces involved during certain speeds and manoeuvres.
For real it sucks, but I wouldn’t say the whole aircraft looks flimsy. From what I saw, it seems like the vertical stabiliser breaks first. That clearly means the vertical stabiliser was too flimsy. Once the vertical stabiliser breaks, the whole plane is destabilised, causing the plane to go through the air at a strange angle, putting far more pressure on the rest of the plane than you would ever expect it to withstand. Of course it’s going to break up. The tail was clearly too weak. The rest of the aircraft? Hard to say. But I would certainly hesitate before claiming that it’s all too weak. It clearly got off the ground and flew for a while before breaking.
the second plane shows very impressively that scaling up a plane is not just scaling up the parts. there is a limit to model making and a hard transition to proper plane building.
It has nothing to do with scale but correct build methods; in this case the tail sheared off. There isn't a limit to model making before you get to a real plane, they just get bigger till you get . . . . a mosquito, for example.
Proper planes will disintegrate if you fly them like this. The thrust-to-weight ratio is massively higher on models than real planes, basically the square-cube law.
@@elmodiddly that is most definitely not true, just like a crow can't exist let alone fly if you reduce it to the size of a mosquito, and a mosquito can't exist if you enlarge it to the size of a crow. These models are built to _look_ like real airplanes, but the physics of flight and of material strength are very different
@@straightpipediesel All of those are parts of the same thing. These models _need_ that kind of thrust to compensate for bad aerodynamics, moving an actually well designed plane towards something closer to a remote controlled rocket or drone with some plane-looking scaffolding on top that barely helps it to fly. Look up small aircraft with wings and propellers that were actually designed to fly like Lancet drones - they don't look like boeing 747s at all
@@NJ-wb1czYou also have to consider bad piloting. You don't fly an airplane without basic instruments by external eyeball 300 feet away. A model's got to be able to climb when a pilot pulls up enough when it looks fast enough. UAVs, missiles and such have inertial reference units, air data probes and autopilots which consider these factors.
These do illustrate how and why airliners aren't meant to bank in turns more than about 35 degrees max. There's no lift surface when they do, so they drop like rocks.
You can do way more than 35° it would just be considered outside the normal flight envelope but yes they are flying these liner way to aggressively, if they are faithful then the aerodynamics are similar and then you're not supposed to fly it like a fighter.
@@user-lv7ph7hs7l Or, if you are going to fly it that aggressively, you need to fly it higher so you have more altitude to try and recover it in. You can see at 0:26 he's almost recovered to level flight, but he needed at least fifty feet more altitude for it to successfully arrest its descent.
@@phytonso9877 Yeah but that's not as spectacular... I have a lot of respect for RC pilots I can't do line of sight well, so I get the desire to keep then close but then again I don't build these things that cost more than a used Toyota. I think some of them are better engineers than they are pilots because if you fly that low you can't mess up. Although I guess the Gripen was the opposite, he seemed like a good pilot but his aircraft completely disintegrated, him I felt bad for. The Concorde was more than high enough to recover from the stall, not sure what he was trying with a delta wing flying as slow as my foam RC plane. You can almost run faster than the stall speed of that thing but I still crashed it... used to having a (virtual) instrument panel and artificial horizon otherwise I would perform about the same. Especially with these using multiple actual jet engines that cost about 3 grand minimum you'd think they focus a bit more on the basics of flying like not stalling or not flying close to the ground at that speed and banking at 60°+. In German we say Mehr Geld als Verstand which roughly translates to more money than common sense/intelligence.
Bank angle doesn't have anything to do with lift. It's energy and angle of attack. The first pilot stalled the right wing. Edit: 3rd and 4th were also stalls.
@@icecl0ud Of course it does, you say yourself he stalled a wing. That's why wings level is one of the steps in a terrain escape maneuver because it gives you the best possible climb rate. Now I supposr you could call it effective lift, as yes technically both wings generate equal lift but that no longer point up against gravity, like a component force, the large the angle at which the force acts the lower the force, remember the vector crap from school? If you are relatively slow or banking extremely hard, the component of the lift facing upward can become less than gravity pulling the aircraft down and it stalls. This causes the nose to drop when you bank, so that's why you give some backpressure and the more you bank the more you pull the nose up to maintain your angle of attack and climb rate. If you don't do that the nose will drop fast at a high bank angle. Try rolling a 737. At some point the nose just drops around 60-70 degrees even if you fully pull up and you drop and by the time you've inverted you're 30° nose down and overspeeding.
Well sadly I have seen a few real crashes of plains and every time when they crash they made a huge fire ball and massive ploom of black smoke, so there really is not comparison to RC.
Number 1: Stall during turn Number 2: Structural Failure of vertical stabiliser followed by complete mid air breakup Number 3: Stall of port wing during turn Number 4: Stall potentially due to low airspeed and high AoA but possibly made worse by wash from aircraft in front Number 5: Pilot distracted by no.4 also stall (note the left rolled just before the final right roll)
7 หลายเดือนก่อน +20
no the number 1 was Bank Angle. It overbanks, and the plane rolls over resulting in steep dive.
The first one was due to a loss of lift from high bank angle, not technically a stall. The lift forces went from mostly pointing up, to pointing sideways. From there the only force keeping the nose up was from the rudder. As the nose fell the pilot didn’t react quickly enough to stop the roll input and pull out of the dive, which due to the low altitude resulted in the crash. Had the pilot quickly reacted to the loss of attitude control and banked left before the loss of lift, it would have been fine. Otherwise they immediately needed to stop with the roll and pull up to maintain altitude
Actually, if you look very closely, it was NOT the engine that fell apart first, but the vertical stabilizer. In fact, the engine and main bidy stayed intact till the very end. So what are you talking about?😅
Given that at 1:48 you can see some glider trailers I suspect this is an airfield for glider planes. They should provide the perfect condition for these kind of events.
1:14 how that can really make you appreciate just how well built real fighter jets are. The fact that they can handle so many g's without tearing apart like that is pretty amazing.
The irony about the Saab disintegrating in midair was that the announcer was going on about how rc models of this size have to get very thoroughly inspected and certified for safelty, proper materials and building quality. And as he was saying that, the thing fell apart...!
1:46 Glad to see that guys hi-vis was telling us what the pilot was thinking. Pretty much all of these crashes could be avoided by learning what bank angle is, and what happens when you go to far.
“Tower we are declaring an emergency” “Copy flight 735, can you make it to the runway” “Negative tower, we’re going down!” “Copy that 735, the giant humans with fire extinguishers are rolling on the tarmac as we speak”
@@MrPoopYTP No they do make RC sized real jet engines, compressor stages, combustion chamber, nozzle, fan, bypass or none. 2-3 grand a pop. Before EDF it used to be more common, now of course you can get high performance EDF like many do for airliners, but with fighter jets it's still common to use actual turbines. It's not that expensive compared to the rest of the thing, some spend 20 grand one toys like that. I will try to add a link for the popular manufacturer but YT sometimes doesn't allow links but easy to find "rc jet engine" anything below 2 grand is EDF. Above there is fire. And noise. They make a lovely roar like a proper aircraft.
what pissed me off the most was how those guys were just stomping around in some guys field over his plants.. crash sure, go get it and walk out, don't stomp all over the farmers livelihood
Nein Nein !!! Actually I feel really sorry for the guys who own and made this, it is their passion. They love this stuff here in Germany, I enjoy watching them in the fields here, although I still argue why they are allowed to do this which disturbs the birds, stresses the wild life, but I cannot go fishing. However it is not because I want this stopped, I just want to go fishing!!!
@@marcoporro Dont start lol Nor is fishing for a hobby. That is why in the Netherlands catch and release is not only allowed but law lol Germany is one of the only countries out of two I think in Europe that do not allow it, catch and release does not kill anything, that is why recaptures of the exact same fish are so regular in some lakes. Anyway, you did not start but I did, sorry lol. But it is an argument because they say, causing them stress for a hobby is the reason, this causes birds stress to fly loud planes around them lol Anyway it is what it is, I still love watching these guys fly them here and I still drive all of the way to the Netherlands to go fishing, so its all good lol
@@Pobsta-de7hb oh no, let me be clear, I have nothing against fishing. I am just saying that more people fish than fly, and there is a more direct impact (you are voluntarily disturbing/injuring fishes vs just possibly and unintentionally disturbing birds), so it's easier to see why people are more concerned with fishing. And even then, in my country I think you almost always have to have a permit on public areas to fly drones or planes (but it might be mostly related to accidentally crashing on people, idk)
@@marcoporro Gawd knows, I am just a whinging old guy and I hate the ban on catch and release fishing here but I am not alone, many do. It is all this peta group or something they are called, but apparently letting your dogs crap where ever they want, leaving rubbish everywhere walking them, cats breeding in the streets by the thousand so theres a massive over population of street cat issues, the largest pet shop having puppies, kittens, monkey and all sorts down the road from me, all look sad and depressed, is ok with them though but not me fishing with my son lol As for flying, I am not sure whether the guys that fly their planes etc here need permits by law etc, perhaps so. I just enjoy watching them and watching them freely enjoy their hobby that they love, whilst I cant lol Who knows, maybe I will learn to fly these things and take up a new hobby lol
That and its producing decent enough speed, the outer shell of these RCs are limited in what kinda material they can use, at least in show regulations but they come made that way.
The last one with the 2 concordes is just strange cuz both crashed at the same time pretty much the one in front crashed after the one behind and that second one was just insane cuz it tilted and the tail just gave in and one that happened the whole plane crumbled
Oh the humanity... the 1/32" scale humanity... Well, time to assemble a scale model airplane hanger and get the tiny NIST investigators on scene, put it back together as best as you can and deliver a teeny tiny investigation report.
Another reason why the fighter jet disintegrated in mid air could be down to the fact that the landing gear wasn't retracted causing excessive drag beyond the aircraft's structural integrity at high speed.😢
I saw an explanation in another video where this is included and I think the pilot tried to fix the angle by changing the rudder direction which put it into that much strain it ripped off, thus the plane lost the ability to stay straight and at that speed the air resistance is too big for it to not tear apart when suddenly going vertical.
![Отказ пилота! Как посадить самолет в экстренной ситуации! [Инструкция]](/img/n.gif)
So are there like big RC firetrucks that they can send out to a crash? 🤔😂
🥇
Also big RC beer trucks and utility trucks to recreate that one scene near the end of Airplane
@@Cyke101 lol and a dump truck full of lamps to get some lights out on that feild
Lol
Lmfao
That was sad to see the entire Brazilian Airforce disintegrate like that.
Not funny
@@LeftIsBest001 Yes funny 😄
@@LeftIsBest001learn to take a joke
@@LeftIsBest001This guys username fits how sensitive his comment is lmao
not that funny since it doesnt make sense unless you are ignorant@@allistairlicorice310
My thoughts are with the tiny families of the tiny souls lost in those crashes. 🙏
R.i.p
I shed a tiny tear for each one
Yea and i was the pilot
@@alexgomez-rc5nt"Where were you when the plane crashed..."
In the tiny cockpit, obviously@@MeOwOgai
All I hear in my head is:
"Bank Angle. Bank Angle. WHOOP WHOOP TERRAIN TERRAIN!!! PULL UP WHOOP WHOOP"
Yes 😂. I can hear the ambiguous robotic female voice loud and clear.
STALL, STALL
TERRAIN AHEAD! TERRAIN AHEAD! WHOOP WHOOP PULL UP! WHOOP WHOOP! PULL UP! STALL! STALL!
DONT SINK, DONT SINK
CLIMB CLIMB
DESCENT DESCENT
WHOOP WHOOP PULL UP PULL UP
STALL STALL
BANK ANGLE BANK ANGLE
SINKRATE DONT SINK
I can't imagine all the tiny paperwork they had to go through after these crashes
That Gripen crash is especially sad as it not only destroyed a beautiful aircraft but also shows that the builder massively underestimated the forces acting on such a large aircraft and built it like many smaller scale planes - out of wood... which is not an issue by itself (see the DH Mosquito), but this thing seemed to be far to fragile to be even airworthy. The fact that the fuselage disintegrated like that shows that this perfectly. And it seems to be made of sections for easier transport, creating even more weak spots.
You can see the despair in his body language. So much money, time and effort gone in an instant.
American 587 moment
As a Brazilian i almost cried..
I couldn’t agree more and condolences to the owner/pilot, however in cockpit videos of the blue angels I’ve seen the highly engineered vertical stabs vibrating like crazy during certain manoeuvres and that design is very strong indeed!
Just goes to show the forces involved during certain speeds and manoeuvres.
For real it sucks, but I wouldn’t say the whole aircraft looks flimsy. From what I saw, it seems like the vertical stabiliser breaks first. That clearly means the vertical stabiliser was too flimsy. Once the vertical stabiliser breaks, the whole plane is destabilised, causing the plane to go through the air at a strange angle, putting far more pressure on the rest of the plane than you would ever expect it to withstand. Of course it’s going to break up.
The tail was clearly too weak. The rest of the aircraft? Hard to say. But I would certainly hesitate before claiming that it’s all too weak. It clearly got off the ground and flew for a while before breaking.
0:29
It even crashed realistically.
Yeah, unlike certain "planes" in the past.
@@nckhedu mean 🛩️✈️🏙️🏙️
@@Chuchisqtoo soon
well yeah it was in real life.
actually it happened again, boy with a giraffe plush on news, he said a second plane hit south tower again
the second plane shows very impressively that scaling up a plane is not just scaling up the parts. there is a limit to model making and a hard transition to proper plane building.
It has nothing to do with scale but correct build methods; in this case the tail sheared off. There isn't a limit to model making before you get to a real plane, they just get bigger till you get . . . . a mosquito, for example.
Proper planes will disintegrate if you fly them like this. The thrust-to-weight ratio is massively higher on models than real planes, basically the square-cube law.
@@elmodiddly that is most definitely not true, just like a crow can't exist let alone fly if you reduce it to the size of a mosquito, and a mosquito can't exist if you enlarge it to the size of a crow. These models are built to _look_ like real airplanes, but the physics of flight and of material strength are very different
@@straightpipediesel All of those are parts of the same thing. These models _need_ that kind of thrust to compensate for bad aerodynamics, moving an actually well designed plane towards something closer to a remote controlled rocket or drone with some plane-looking scaffolding on top that barely helps it to fly. Look up small aircraft with wings and propellers that were actually designed to fly like Lancet drones - they don't look like boeing 747s at all
@@NJ-wb1czYou also have to consider bad piloting. You don't fly an airplane without basic instruments by external eyeball 300 feet away. A model's got to be able to climb when a pilot pulls up enough when it looks fast enough. UAVs, missiles and such have inertial reference units, air data probes and autopilots which consider these factors.
Fantastic entertainment, and a terrible loss :) Thanks!
Hi
yo
These do illustrate how and why airliners aren't meant to bank in turns more than about 35 degrees max. There's no lift surface when they do, so they drop like rocks.
You can do way more than 35° it would just be considered outside the normal flight envelope but yes they are flying these liner way to aggressively, if they are faithful then the aerodynamics are similar and then you're not supposed to fly it like a fighter.
@@user-lv7ph7hs7l Or, if you are going to fly it that aggressively, you need to fly it higher so you have more altitude to try and recover it in. You can see at 0:26 he's almost recovered to level flight, but he needed at least fifty feet more altitude for it to successfully arrest its descent.
@@phytonso9877 Yeah but that's not as spectacular... I have a lot of respect for RC pilots I can't do line of sight well, so I get the desire to keep then close but then again I don't build these things that cost more than a used Toyota. I think some of them are better engineers than they are pilots because if you fly that low you can't mess up. Although I guess the Gripen was the opposite, he seemed like a good pilot but his aircraft completely disintegrated, him I felt bad for. The Concorde was more than high enough to recover from the stall, not sure what he was trying with a delta wing flying as slow as my foam RC plane. You can almost run faster than the stall speed of that thing but I still crashed it... used to having a (virtual) instrument panel and artificial horizon otherwise I would perform about the same. Especially with these using multiple actual jet engines that cost about 3 grand minimum you'd think they focus a bit more on the basics of flying like not stalling or not flying close to the ground at that speed and banking at 60°+. In German we say Mehr Geld als Verstand which roughly translates to more money than common sense/intelligence.
Bank angle doesn't have anything to do with lift. It's energy and angle of attack. The first pilot stalled the right wing.
Edit: 3rd and 4th were also stalls.
@@icecl0ud Of course it does, you say yourself he stalled a wing. That's why wings level is one of the steps in a terrain escape maneuver because it gives you the best possible climb rate.
Now I supposr you could call it effective lift, as yes technically both wings generate equal lift but that no longer point up against gravity, like a component force, the large the angle at which the force acts the lower the force, remember the vector crap from school?
If you are relatively slow or banking extremely hard, the component of the lift facing upward can become less than gravity pulling the aircraft down and it stalls.
This causes the nose to drop when you bank, so that's why you give some backpressure and the more you bank the more you pull the nose up to maintain your angle of attack and climb rate. If you don't do that the nose will drop fast at a high bank angle. Try rolling a 737. At some point the nose just drops around 60-70 degrees even if you fully pull up and you drop and by the time you've inverted you're 30° nose down and overspeeding.
Imagine people really far away not realising it's an RC plane and just thought they saw a commercial airline crash in front of their own eyes
Well sadly I have seen a few real crashes of plains and every time when they crash they made a huge fire ball and massive ploom of black smoke, so there really is not comparison to RC.
@@HOLLASOUNDSthe odds of seeing more than one plane crash in real time in your life are roughly 400,000 times less likely than winning the lottery
@@asparkdeity8717however he never mentioned or clarified he was at the scene or just watched a youtube compilation
@@asparkdeity8717 I'm not convinced that's true. What numbers are you using?
@@HOLLASOUNDS You mean like the great plains?
Imagine stalling two Concords within seconds
I'd never seen a spontaneous mid-air re-kit before.
*CAUSE OF ALL CRASHES*
0:00 Pilot Error
0:46 Too much stress on vertical stabiliser
1:32 Pilot Error
1:56 Stall
4th one was pilot error as well. Should've known that the plane couldn't climb that steeply, and didn't leave enough altitude for stall recovery
@@ZeroG_Bandit yeah. Basically AF4590 in a nutshell
@@FlamingHotGamingYT, well, AF4590 was on fire, this one wasn't
Was wondering why that gripen just kind of exploded
That griffin went down like it went into a Star Wars nebula fr
Man, I had no idea RC planes got that big. That is crazy.
you probably mean hobbies/toys. otherwise (often military) drones can be as large as manned aircraft
@@user-wq9mw2xz3jHe never said drones
@@user-wq9mw2xz3jYou know what they mean.
Just equip one with a bomb and you have something scarier
@@user-wq9mw2xz3jwas about to say this, I think the James-Webb space telescope is also rc technically
Number 1: Stall during turn
Number 2: Structural Failure of vertical stabiliser followed by complete mid air breakup
Number 3: Stall of port wing during turn
Number 4: Stall potentially due to low airspeed and high AoA but possibly made worse by wash from aircraft in front
Number 5: Pilot distracted by no.4 also stall (note the left rolled just before the final right roll)
no the number 1 was Bank Angle. It overbanks, and the plane rolls over resulting in steep dive.
The first one was due to a loss of lift from high bank angle, not technically a stall. The lift forces went from mostly pointing up, to pointing sideways. From there the only force keeping the nose up was from the rudder. As the nose fell the pilot didn’t react quickly enough to stop the roll input and pull out of the dive, which due to the low altitude resulted in the crash. Had the pilot quickly reacted to the loss of attitude control and banked left before the loss of lift, it would have been fine. Otherwise they immediately needed to stop with the roll and pull up to maintain altitude
Number 1: No one cares
Number 2: no one cares
Number 3: No one cares
Number 4: no one cares
Number 5 did not crash hardly probably just the gear broke
@@jasonmurawski5877this is indeed correct. This is a very common error for inexperienced pilots and pilots flying planes heavier than they’re used to.
the Concorde one was actually quite realistic
Edit: thank yall for the likes
nah, there was no hotel… just a fence
@@ILoudEstI nah 💀
@@ILoudEstIthats crazy
The Concorde was paying tribute to TU-144...
@@ILoudEstI 💀
The tragedy... so many lives lost 😢
The plants were damaged
At least those kind giants rendered assistance.
yeah ants
Meat eaters cry for the plants. 😭
Rip to the ants
1:11 They learned a hard lesson that day. Not to make a high end RC jet engine out of confetti. 😭
lol mate im aussie what about you mate
@@user-zv7ew5lo1pwhat's being an Australian got to do with anything he said ?
@@kainesun3403I bet you it was the confetti
Actually, if you look very closely, it was NOT the engine that fell apart first, but the vertical stabilizer. In fact, the engine and main bidy stayed intact till the very end.
So what are you talking about?😅
TIMMMAAAHHHH
@@kainesun3403
i hope the farmers crops are ok
in the second one I was kinda expecting to see the pilot ejecting...
That's what I enjoy tremendously about these giant RC airliners backed by hundreds hours of expert craftmanship : their crashes. Utter joy.
🤣🤣🤣
Don’t forget : they cost $1000s to build.
Oh, you a devil
@@Danin4985 Ohhh, that renders the crash even more pleasurable 🤤🤤🤤!!!
@@Shifftee I may resemble that remark.
1:46 Can’t believe we escaped Buganda-
Thankfully Vanoss knew how to fly a plane
1:11 show this to any marketing team that asks why engineers take so long to complete testing
i love how the plans are so big that they have a whole ass huge runway
Most RC clubs have a runway, if not a real street then well trimmed grass fields.
Ass huge
Given that at 1:48 you can see some glider trailers I suspect this is an airfield for glider planes. They should provide the perfect condition for these kind of events.
1:14 how that can really make you appreciate just how well built real fighter jets are. The fact that they can handle so many g's without tearing apart like that is pretty amazing.
That's why they cost tens of millions each
Theyre like largely solid fckin titanium and aluminum
If you built one that can handle great G's, you'd have a flying razor blade! 😬😬😬
@@xfg007 I thought it was just because the military wants to waste the tax dollars haha
@@xfg007thanks captain obvious
I feel so sorry for these guys.
The way they are sad after all the work😕
They have tons of money, so..they’ll get over it
@@andy86i That's not always the case...
Occupational hazard that goes with this hobby I guess.
I just hope they cleaned up the mess they made.
1:29 When your plane disintegrates in the air and that one guy laughs ! 😂
That AirBerlin crash accurately depicted how the company ended💀
Especially the “oh, Scheiße!” part!
That guys vest gives 2 Fuchs.
that guy fuchs
What are you talking abo- oooohhh...
It's pronounced "Fuooks"
@@niallproud7450 Jared?
1:26
"Tja, das ist natürlich sehr sehr schade jetzt..."
The German reaction for everything from a dropped sandwich to a plane crash 😅
2:01 LMAO both concords fall out of the sky.... lol
The mini black boxes were recovered
But the mini fig ntsb were still investigating
The irony about the Saab disintegrating in midair was that the announcer was going on about how rc models of this size have to get very thoroughly inspected and certified for safelty, proper materials and building quality. And as he was saying that, the thing fell apart...!
RIP in pepperoni Vanoss and Lui 🙏🏼 Now they cant ever escape Uganda 😞
I cant believe that vanossgaming and luicalibre crashed what a tragedy 😢
1:48
The back of his high vis summing up the current situation perfectly.
Anyone else curious to watch the other crashes after the Vanoss video?
RIP to all those brave pilots.
I forgot i said this
@@gamer-fe9edwooosh
@@gamer-fe9ed🎉that’s the joke🎉
@@gamer-fe9ed Really, ya think?
@@gamer-fe9ed😮🤯
The lineup for the new season of Air Crash Investigation's looking incredible so far
1:13
- How many times have you watched this ?
- Me: Yes
1:46 Glad to see that guys hi-vis was telling us what the pilot was thinking.
Pretty much all of these crashes could be avoided by learning what bank angle is, and what happens when you go to far.
You beat me to it, was just going to say the same thing!!
Looks fun. Really expensive but fun. Hope they all got their planes fixed up.
“oh you thought it was fine not to put your tray table up look what’s gonna happen now!”
“Tower we are declaring an emergency”
“Copy flight 735, can you make it to the runway”
“Negative tower, we’re going down!”
“Copy that 735, the giant humans with fire extinguishers are rolling on the tarmac as we speak”
1:22 bro in the white shirt has such a zesty run lol
Yeah I noticed that 😂
I bursted out laughing at 00:30, when he uses the fire extinguisher for the small fire....
All part of the requirements probably at a public event.
That's a 5 grand jet engines, if you can save it or at least parts of it that's worth a try.
@@oddities-whatnotno that was on a private airfield. They tried to suffocate the fire with dirt but it didn’t work
@@user-lv7ph7hs7lwhat you mean is EDFs, right? Jet engines would be overkill on an airliner
@@MrPoopYTP No they do make RC sized real jet engines, compressor stages, combustion chamber, nozzle, fan, bypass or none. 2-3 grand a pop.
Before EDF it used to be more common, now of course you can get high performance EDF like many do for airliners, but with fighter jets it's still common to use actual turbines. It's not that expensive compared to the rest of the thing, some spend 20 grand one toys like that. I will try to add a link for the popular manufacturer but YT sometimes doesn't allow links but easy to find "rc jet engine" anything below 2 grand is EDF. Above there is fire. And noise. They make a lovely roar like a proper aircraft.
I thought that first plane had Ryanair markings - I was going to say it looked like one of their better landings...
Air New Zealand
what pissed me off the most was how those guys were just stomping around in some guys field over his plants.. crash sure, go get it and walk out, don't stomp all over the farmers livelihood
Yup, total lack of respect.
Vanoss and lui were driving that one commercial plane
They look real. And since they are unmanned I could watch this all day
3:28 Cows were like "Yo everyone check this shit out, some humans crashed this tiny plane in our field"
Lol
THEY’RE HERE TO MUTILATE US!!! RUN! 😂
Who here from Vanoss
the concorde was a bit unlucky - it wouldve landed hard but fine without the fence
That concord cannot get a break. (No pun intended)
Reminded me of the TU 144 Le Bourget event. Except 2 supersonics crashed at the same time instead of 1
the concorde flew just like the real ones
HAHAHA!
Not really. This one was way underpowered.
@@goku445he meant like how they crash
@@Aviation_Videos123 I knew what he meant.
Mate flip you there was only 1 Concorde crash
I know it must be incredibly frustrating and costly to the owners but there is something quite amusing about RC crashes, lol.
😂😂
The NASA dude be like “The vehicle has suffered an unscheduled rapid disassembly” once again. 😂
Wasn't that an excuse SpaceX used once? lol
@@darkwoodmovies yep! April 2023 when a test flight failed 🤣
As someone from NZ, I doubt Air NZ will even bother giving out refunds for the unpleasant flight experience.
If you see a cow walking around experiencing a small plane enema………………………
2:09 The Concorde really is the Ford Mustang among RC planes ☠
1:14 it’s kinda scary how realistic the Gripen crash looks like
Too much speed sound
Rip the Concorde that hit the fence
Nice Crash!
Ha ha ha, voll geil und so authentisch, super Show 😄🤣😂😆😉👍👏👏👏
🤬🤬🤬🤬😡😡😡👿👿👿😡😡👿👿😡👿👿😡👿🤪😡😡😡👿😡👿😡😡👿😡👿😡
Okay, I think the Boeings were rolled too far to their sides, and the Concordes were stalling out, but the Mig? Was it hit with a MIM-23 Hawk?
Wasn’t a Mig it was a Gripen
It was 1 Boeing and 1 airbus lol. and that’s a gripen not a mig
They all stalled.
High bank angle, too much aero dynamic forces, too high angle of attack
Wish it was a longer video. Absolutely hilarious.
Sadly all 0 passengers died on all of these fights
As Howard Coesll once said “ down goes Frazier “ . 😂
This is tough to watch. Rest in peace to all the people on those planes🙏
Many thanks to these guys for making me feel like my Warhammer-hobby isn't that expensive after all. 😂
2:07 9/11..
why did it make that explode sound 😭😭😭😭
Great to see so many qualified aircraft engineers giving their professional input in these comments…
ksp1 players
Thought that second one was a real size jet for a minute. WOW ! That's BIG !!
So much work, expense, patience and craftsmanship gone in a heartbeat.
Nein Nein !!! Actually I feel really sorry for the guys who own and made this, it is their passion. They love this stuff here in Germany, I enjoy watching them in the fields here, although I still argue why they are allowed to do this which disturbs the birds, stresses the wild life, but I cannot go fishing. However it is not because I want this stopped, I just want to go fishing!!!
I guess because they are not actively killing birds, lol
@@marcoporro Dont start lol Nor is fishing for a hobby. That is why in the Netherlands catch and release is not only allowed but law lol Germany is one of the only countries out of two I think in Europe that do not allow it, catch and release does not kill anything, that is why recaptures of the exact same fish are so regular in some lakes. Anyway, you did not start but I did, sorry lol. But it is an argument because they say, causing them stress for a hobby is the reason, this causes birds stress to fly loud planes around them lol Anyway it is what it is, I still love watching these guys fly them here and I still drive all of the way to the Netherlands to go fishing, so its all good lol
@@Pobsta-de7hb oh no, let me be clear, I have nothing against fishing. I am just saying that more people fish than fly, and there is a more direct impact (you are voluntarily disturbing/injuring fishes vs just possibly and unintentionally disturbing birds), so it's easier to see why people are more concerned with fishing.
And even then, in my country I think you almost always have to have a permit on public areas to fly drones or planes (but it might be mostly related to accidentally crashing on people, idk)
@@marcoporro Gawd knows, I am just a whinging old guy and I hate the ban on catch and release fishing here but I am not alone, many do. It is all this peta group or something they are called, but apparently letting your dogs crap where ever they want, leaving rubbish everywhere walking them, cats breeding in the streets by the thousand so theres a massive over population of street cat issues, the largest pet shop having puppies, kittens, monkey and all sorts down the road from me, all look sad and depressed, is ok with them though but not me fishing with my son lol
As for flying, I am not sure whether the guys that fly their planes etc here need permits by law etc, perhaps so. I just enjoy watching them and watching them freely enjoy their hobby that they love, whilst I cant lol
Who knows, maybe I will learn to fly these things and take up a new hobby lol
@@Pobsta-de7hb fly an RC helicopter and use it to fish, lol. Catch two fishes with one stone ahah
Those aren't planes, those are cruse missiles!!...
“34 days without a crash”. Oh dammit. “0 days without a crash”.
The concords are so realistic. Wow!
In germany we would say : ,, nicht so tief, Rüdiger !“
2:03
Perfect example of a stall because of low airspeed and high angle of attack
Very interesting to see a stall like that.
The Concorde actually was saved quite well.
With the Concordes, did the second guy just rubber-neck and lose his as well or?
Are some of them just disintegrating in mid-air from the wind resistance?
That and its producing decent enough speed, the outer shell of these RCs are limited in what kinda material they can use, at least in show regulations but they come made that way.
poor construction using weak balsa wood for too large airframe. Hilariously embarrassing failure
No it’s too much stress in the airframe I think
Could be caused by too many g-forces or overspeed
RC air defense just doing its job on the MiG 😅
It was a Saab
that first crash is a great example of why fly by wire system exist at all, I believe it was dutch roll that put him over
Nicht so tief, Rüdiger!!
The last one with the 2 concordes is just strange cuz both crashed at the same time pretty much the one in front crashed after the one behind and that second one was just insane cuz it tilted and the tail just gave in and one that happened the whole plane crumbled
It would be a lot cheaper to fly a full size 😱
some of that reminded me of United 93... back in 2001.
Wow, both concorde's going in at the same time???
RIP all those tiny pilots.
3:02 watch out sheep!
Oh the humanity... the 1/32" scale humanity...
Well, time to assemble a scale model airplane hanger and get the tiny NIST investigators on scene, put it back together as best as you can and deliver a teeny tiny investigation report.
"Thanks for letting me try here is your controller back. I think the BBQ has started over there, see ya!"
Another reason why the fighter jet disintegrated in mid air could be down to the fact that the landing gear wasn't retracted causing excessive drag beyond the aircraft's structural integrity at high speed.😢
Look again, It was retracted
The tail came off; nothing to do with the landing gear, which were retracted, by the way.
What happened to the second one at 1:11?
Was it rammed by a fly?
There was so much pressure on the Rc plane so it exploded in mid air
I saw an explanation in another video where this is included and I think the pilot tried to fix the angle by changing the rudder direction which put it into that much strain it ripped off, thus the plane lost the ability to stay straight and at that speed the air resistance is too big for it to not tear apart when suddenly going vertical.
@@ayeshafaisal949 correction on your lack of intelligence, the planes structure was to weak for THATS speed stressing the tail and so on.
@@desynx9571 hahaha you're the one lacking intelligence for posting such reply.
@@goku445 please delete this, you are embarrassing yourself, smh.
And then they waited for the in flight recorder to see what went wrong.
Welcome to ArCee Airlines! I'm your lead pilot, Captain C. G. Toofarback, here with your co-pilot Turner Notastuntplane ...
"Nein! Nein!" was definitely his wife knowing he will be back in the cellar for the next months 😅
"Hey, look, we're trashing some guy's farm." "Who cares, muh plane went down."