ESA did a video on how the Soyuz works a few years back, but yours is far more detailed and advanced. And now I know what those T and M and A abbreviations mean.
Jared , just a request, please create more videos on science related topics , it literally helps out a lot of students as well as learners , and lemme tell you that your animations make every concept crystal clear . Thank you so much
@@AverageAlien this is kind of science that is specifically dealing with space .... I am talking about science that we use in day to day life.... Like he made a video on working of electric dc motor....
@@JaredOwen I am very confused on how the ISS narvigates the earth. Does the iss go round the earth such that at a time its above the earth and another time, the earth is above it? What is a free fall of the iss? Does the iss use energy to move round the Earth. An animation will definitely clear the illusion so many of us have
Who else agree that this guy deserves much more for such amazing reascearch and animation. That clearly shows how much effort you put into it. Really impressive :]
In some cases, the latest Soyuz modification can deliver crews to the ISS in 3 hours. And on the Progress ship, a flight for 1.30 hours will soon be tested, which will then be applied on the Soyuz.
For people commenting: "it's a 50 years old rocket" no it's not, It not the same rocket, it has changed A LOT, the only thing that remains it's the name and the shape, also Russia is using the Proton-M rockets and the Angarah ones.
@TheDarkSide69420 It's funny though the soyuz is still flying and the u s used it for a decade because they didn't have anything to get to space.It's funny, though the Soyuz. Maybe the US should ask Russia or China to help them get their stranded astronauts from the space station..😂😂😂
I enjoy the way Jared simply talks into his microphone instead of shouting into it like so many other TH-camrs today. Makes for a pleasant listening experience.
I never know the Soyuz was more than 40 years old and was originally intended for Lunar landing missions. Sergei Korolev(The Soyuz Designer) is truly a 'miracle worker'
Над этим проэктом работали тысячи учёных, а не только Королев. Это если сейчас говорить, что Илон Маск создал SpaceX, и не говорить о тысячах учёных в его команде!
The first flight of the b-52 was in 1952...The last aircraft of the B-52 series was built in June 1962.))))So why are you surprised.These machines have also been modernized and improved over their history.😂
@@jayesh1891 nah cmon you're a bit too pessimistic, you've seen how spacex progress. starship might not be fully orbitally capable in october but in a few years it'll be flying for sure. spacex are counting on it for starlink V2 deployment after all. human rated starships might take a while though, for sure.
It still blows my mind that we're able to fire people off the face of the planet and they dock onto a craft that's wizzing around up in space. I can't even dock my key into the front door lock on the first 3 attempts per entry.
@Stephen Beck-von-Peccoz BRUH MAYBE HE JUST DOESN’T HAVE GOOD HAND EYE COORDINATION. JUST BECAUSE SOMEONE CAN’T PUT A KEY IN A LOCK DOESN’T MEAN THAT THEIR AN ALCHOHOLIC
In Malaysia we have a first astronaut “Dr.Sheikh Muszaphar Shukor” launched to the ISS aboard Soyuz TMA-11 on 10 October 2007….greeting from Malaysia guys🇲🇾🤗
Now Soyuz takes only 3 hours to reach the ISS! "The Russian Soyuz MS-17 spacecraft carrying NASA astronaut Kate Rubins and Russian cosmonauts Sergey Ryzhikov and Sergey Kud-Sverchkov docked with the space station at 4:48 a.m. EDT (0848 GMT), just 3 hours and 3 minutes after lifting off from the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan on a Soyuz rocket."
I love the Soyuz. Its amazing how long the basic design has endured. The spacecraft is old, but the rocket, from the R-7 family, is older still. You can look at what launched Sputnik in the 1950s and its pretty much the same rocket.
LOL they are not the same spacecraft and not the same rocket. Just like the author explained, there have been many major modifications and revisions. Soyuz has been setting world records for orbital docking because it has extremely reliable and precise launch sequence. That's thanks to new hardware and automation they got in 2016. And Soyuz 2.1b upper stage uses RD-0124 engine that first flew in 2006 and has vacuum efficiency (ISP) of 359 seconds, far surpassing anything else kerosene based. For example, SpaceX Merlin vacuum engine has 348 seconds ISP. Just because something looks the same doesn't mean its the same. Modern Soyuz is the most reliable, precise and efficient piloted spacecraft currently operational. It is a vast improvement over 1960's version.
russians know how to build simple technology that gets the job done. simple means that not a lot can go wrong and that it doesn't go out of date quickly. it's something I wish other countries would learn to do.
Ты, имбецил? Он с первых же минут врёт, союз не лунный корабль и космическая гонка шла до первого полёта человека в космос, а не выдуманной американцамт "лунной гонки"
@@МойАккаунт-ъ6и имбецил тут только ты. Изначально союз разрабатывался в рамках программы полёта к луне, быдлоид необразованный. И лунная гонка - часть космической гонки, которая не закончилась только лишь полётом человека в космос
@@Виктор-ф8ц7я идиоты изучили новое слово? и теперь им везде ИИ мерещится. Видосы парень сам пилит и из Блендера не вылазиет, тут только перевод на Русский через ИИ. Назови мне хоть один ИИ который такую графику делает? лол
When you are modeling any curved surfaces with geometry like here with the periscope and windows (6:50), I know that the norm is to use as few polys as needed to convey shape, but sometimes it is very visible on the final render, what I've realized over time is that regardless of the program if you increase the number of polys by 2, 4, 8, 16 or even more only on those sections (if you decide not to use masked textures), it usually doesn't really affect performance or render time as much if at all, but if it does affect try to attach as many separate geometries into a single object because that decreases the number of calls to memory, with this technique I've managed to have entire cities modeled in detail light as a feather on the viewport where otherwise I couldn't get a single block of houses when they had all their elements separated. I LOVE the thoroughness you show on your projects!!! Cheers!!!
This is some of the highest quality educational content I’ve ever seen on TH-cam. Keep it up! I hope someday we’ll get to see animations for Orion, starliner, starship, and dragon! Also, I’m impressed you’ve already updated your ISS module to include nauka!
@@UnQuacker да, украинский политик, грамотный тип. Хотелось бы Украине такого. В нашу сторону (России) не смотрит. Говорит красиво, заслуги есть, но к сожалению, у него нет связи ни с силовиками, ни с армией. А жаль. ПослеСлов: мне жалко советское наследие и пусть оно не достанется нам то, хотя бы не пропадет.
I have been fascinated with spaceflight in general and Soyuz in particular for as long as I can remember. This video is stunning, and right up my alley, thank you!!!
I have to admit that the Soyuz is still the most convenient mini-ship for getting people into orbit. It's still better than the Crew-Dragon, whose passengers are forced to urinate (and poop) in a small container right above their helmets, instead of being secluded in a separate compartment (to even powder your nose), like in the Soyuz. In the head of the designers of this spacecraft was the idea of a submarine, where all systems should help the survival of the crew.
У штатов в принцепе с унитазами не задалось, достаточно вспомнить, как часто он ломается на их модуле на МКС и как их космонавтам приходится бегать в нашу половину.
I noticed that as well. One update from me though - I believe Soyuz docks now even within 3 hours, not 6. Nevertheless this video is great work and great source of knowledge, so thanks for making it.
Small issue in the orbital animations: Both the orbital and angular velocity decrease with the orbital radius (and thus height). So when the Soyuz is below the ISS, it should be slightly faster and also also complete a single orbit faster. This is essential for understanding docking, e.g. why the Soyuz launches _after_ the ISS passes above and why to catch up with the ISS you don't need to accelerate, you just need to wait in a lower orbit. On the other hand, accelerating prograde raises your orbit, but at the same time slows you down. Admittedly, 250 km and 500 km don't differ much in terms of the earths radius and thus their orbital speed is quite similar, but to me it looked in your animations almost like the angular velocity of all spacecraft was the same. On addition to exaggerating the difference in orbital heights, I would have exaggerated the speed of the lower spacecraft to bring the point across, which I in theory learned during my physics degree but internalised while playing KSP
Thanks Michael - you are right, that is a critical part of Rendezvous and Docking. I was afraid the video was getting too long so I decided to cut that part out
Türkiye'de astronomi eğitimi alanında doktora yapıyorum. Öğrenciler için temel astronomi konularıyla ilgili öğretim materyalleri hazırlıyorum. Bu sırada videolarınıza denk geldim ve çok başarılı buldum. Bu videoları derslerde öğrencilere göstererek uzay teknolojilerinin nasıl çalıştıklarını onlara daha kolay anlatabiliriz. Bu başarılı içerikleri hazırlamak için gösterdiğiniz gayretlerden dolayı teşekkür ederim.
I love the Russian philosophy in solving engineering problems, compared to us in the US. Russian systems are simple, tough and long lasting. Ours happen to be precise but very sensitive and pretty. Even when you take a look at their Airforce planes. Ours have extremely advanced avionics but require enormous maintenance for the skin and have to be cautious in bad weather because of skin peeling off; also FOD. Russians on the other hand designed their planes tough, can take off and land in sand storms So fascinating!!
It's interesting since part of the reason why they have lost the space race was because their rocket design was too complex, the N1 rocket was powered by 30 engines which made it too unreliable. There are examples of complex Russian military projects, some of which were produced, for example when it comes to planes: ANT-20 - soviet interwar heavy bomber powered by 8 engines (Its development, the TB-6 was supposed to be a super heavy bomber powered by 12 engines) Su-5 - a mixed propeller and jet plane Lun-class ekranoplan - a 286 ton ground effect plane classified as a ship VVA-14 - a soviet military ekranoplan that was also meant to later have VTOL capability Yak-38 - soviet VTOL plane Ka-50 - an attack helicopter with 2 counterrotating rotors Su-47 - a reverse wing fighter plane requiring complex controls There is also the Buran space shuttle that was more advanced than the American space shuttle, but the project was too expensive. There are also quite a lot of non-aircraft soviet experimental vehicles, for example one of the cooler ones was TES-3, soviet mobile tracked nuclear reactor. I suppose the Russian simplicity is mainly a result of their leadership philosophy which recognises that they shouldn't spend too much money on mass producing too expensive, unreliable, experimental designs.
Do you understand how talented you are and how much you’ve revolutionized learning mechanics for those trying to learn? Thank you from the bottom of my heart
Terima kasih kerana menggunakan Bahasa Melayu untuk video ini dan kami rakyat Malaysia suka dan faham dengan apa yang disampaikan melalui ucapan yang jelas😊
Really well done! I remember getting to pick out a model at the hobby store on a trip to the coast with my folks at 11yrs old in 1975. I picked out the "Apollo-Soyuz Mission Commemorative Model" but could not figure out anything about the Soyuz part nor how it worked and who went where (nor could my Dad, an aerospace engineer). Now I finally know, and the Soviets have such a novel and unique approach to things.
@@Алекс-к5ц5ъ я не хочу тебя расстроить, но каких-то принципиально новых технологий в crew dragon не используется, он выглядит безусловно необычно, не более. Если ты говоришь про starship, то там те же жрд, материалы корпуса и комплектующих, но масштабы больше в несколько раз. Стар союз если только внешним видом. Он используется для запуска на НОО и делает это отлично, пусть наша космонавтика сейчас явно отстаёт, но называть союз-старым говном, это признак твоей неграмотности в космонавтике. Маск вешает лапшу на уши про 1 000 000 людей на марсе в ближайшие десятилетия(эту глупость разоблачили конечно), использует космос для маркетинговых целей своих компаний, я не говорю про то, что он недавно писал в твиттере. Противопоставь что-либо мне, я готов поспорить
@@Алекс-к5ц5ъ представляешь-"святой маск" отказался от американской системы возвращаемых Шатлов и перешел ровно на ту же систему,что и использовал СССР и Россия-запуск космического корабля на ракете,стыковка к МКС,отстыковка от МКС и вход в атмосферу Земли так же как это делает Советский космос уже 60 лет-используя термощит,а не с ...ые плитки из-за которых погиб экипаж "Коламбуса"!И так же после входа в атмосферу в низкие ее слои открывается парашют-ровно так же как это ху....у тучу лет делают на Союзах!И еще так же как на Союзах у Драгона появилась точно такая же система спасения экипажа как у Союза!И которая полностью отсутствовала на "Шатлах"!Так что правильно тебе ответили-ляпнул как в лужу ...нул!.. ;)
Soyuz launch animation: th-cam.com/video/_v7YgDum2Sg/w-d-xo.html For more videos like one check out my space playlist: th-cam.com/play/PLgVMn8k8t5JNeGds2KjPLXh37Y2oHuKHW.html
I love how thorough and detailed this video is. The orbital animation really helped me to understand how they move up or down in orbital positions. I can really tell you put a lot of effort into this video. Thanks. I learned a lot.
Cosmonaut "κόσμος" + "ναύτης" that is, "floating in space," "driving ships in space." Agree, this is more logical, isn't it? Especially considering that cosmonauts really control a spaceship in space, and not on the star "Αστέρας", as in the case of an astronaut)
A Chinese astronaut instead is called Taikonaut. From the world "tàikōngrén", meaning "Spaceman". But in Chinese, the official word means "Heaven Navigator"
Dear friends, can you imagine what we could achieve by working together and trusting each other? What an unthinkable stupidity to be at enmity instead of going forward... I hope you and I will see peace and friendship in our lives... Peace and good to all!! Many thanks to the author for the work done!
You see, most of the space stuff was created because of the Space Race. Without it, it would be impossible to explain people why governments spend hundreds of billions of tax money for some space junk instead of improving healthcare, education etc. People DO NEED competition to complete truly great projects.
I am positively amazed with the quality of your videos... This is the third one I'm watching and you really do have a talent for explaining technical things in a way anyone can understand... Great work 🙂🙂🙂
In Russian it was Soyuz-Apollon witn N at the end with stress on the last syllable. And there were cigarettes of the same name en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo-Soyuz_(cigarette)
@@paruhblgen4222 - I knew that the Soviets called it Soyuz-Apollon if you transliterate directly from the Cyrillic. Given that the video seems targeted mostly towards an American audience, I decided to translate the name instead of transliterate it. Besides, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary and Romania all called the Apollo programme "Apollo", not Apollon; and I was including all of the Eastern Bloc, not just the USSR.
На самом деле от старого союза там осталось название и оболочка. Его модернизировали много раз, чтобы теперь он мог долетать за 3 часа. Расчёты на технике 40 летней давности не позволяли делать это так быстро. Как и координировать работу двигателей как теперь.
@@darxray Надеюсь когда нибудь настанет время когда эти свиньи (олигархи, миллионеры, политики, корпорации) не будут мешать дружбе всех народов. Нам, простым людям нечего делить
It's really amazing to see you doing all these animations, and explaining it in simple terms for us to understand. I also love how you share what tools you are using to do all these, for example for this video, the Skillshare platform. Very impressive.
these animations are a fantastic resource for us parents trying to find material that will both engage and enrich our young children, not to mention it is an amazing product of your meticulous research and effort. Thank you so much and please don't stop!!
@@jasperzanjani I have 4 grown children, one is doing a Phd in Aeronautical engineering and wants to become an astronaut, one has a MSC in computing and AI, yet none could I get interested enough to want to sit through this and take it in, despite its quality.
@@jasperzanjani She is clever and has her own mind, gifted in maths but does not like maths. So I am pleased the direction she wants to go in, Yet it is of limited direction from me. Maybe I inspired her more than taught her, the maths certainly is way over my head. I always found it hard to get my kids to sit down with me.
This is an incredibly impressive animation. If you’re at university, any NASA center would absolutely hire you for a pathway internship. There are so many mission concepts that need a skilled animator to bring them to life.
7:15 Notice how the hatches always open inward so that pressurei inside the spacecraft pushes the and keeps the hatch closed. It’s failsafe and iimpossible for a hatch to burst open while in space. This is unlike in movies and TV where spacecraft hatches and airlock doors always seem to open inside out. (Impossible)
Старался оболгать. Он с первых же минут врёт, союз не лунный корабль и космическая гонка шла до первого полёта человека в космос, а не выдуманной американцамт "лунной гонки".
Your videos are amazing! U deserve way more subscribers. I can’t imagine the work that goes in to animating and researching these videos! Keep it up mate!
Thankyou Jared! If I may in light of your superb video's about Soyuz, may I add that Cosmonaut Yulia Peresild has added even more interest in Soyuz by making the movie The Challenge around Soyuz flights SM-19 assent and SM18 return, and her 12 days on the ISS! I have been advised by another TH-camr that the movie The Challenge, is expected to take less than a year from her 17 October 2021 Soyuz landing to be completed. Yulia Peresild is one of Russia's most loved and accomplished actresses, I always love her internationally acclaimed leading role in and movie The Battle for Sevastopol. Yulia played the Russian Staff Sergeant, promoted Officer Luydmila Pavlichenko (Hero of the Soviet Union) severely injured in the siege's of Odessa, and Sevastopol and who then took part in a tour of the US to encourage America to open a second front against fascism in WW2. American First Lady Mrs Eleanor Roosevelt embraced the world famous Pavlichenko and made her a guest at the White House while in Washington... a well publicised story at the time and a part of US/Russian history. Yulia was great, now standby fof her role in The Challenge! Cheers!
Thank you for covering this. I’ve always been fascinated by the space industry. To say your videos are incredible is an understatement! Also, The Everyday Astronaut has been working on a big video project on the history of Soviet rocket engines and their design. The wealth of knowledge on TH-cam is fantastic.
An absolutely fantastic video, I've been wanting something like this for ages. Slight mistake: The Kurs system expects the drogue to be facing retrograde along the orbit, so for docking to a nadir port such as on Rassvet like you show here, the ISS will rotate around such that the port points retrograde. However this is really not recorded anywhere so I don't blame you for missing it. Bonus fact: The Soyuz's on-orbit lifetime is limited by the degradation of the peroxide in it's landing thrusters to about 200 days. Second bonus fact: Rassvet is the only Russian orbital section hardware to have been launched on a US launch vehicle
Not 6 hours but 3 hours: Russians express jurney is improved so well that they can get from start to docking to ISS in just three hours! And one mistake: The third nationality in space after Soviets and Americans were Czechs. In 1978 on Soyuz 28 flight to Salyut 6 orbital station, cosmonauts Alexej Gubarev from Russia and Vladimir Remek, Czech nationality. Polish flag is missing there too.
Vietnam is missing too. We're the first non-Soviet Asian country to travel cosmonaut into space thanks to the USSR international program (Soyuz 37.) Maybe this list in the video is only countries after 1991? I'm not sure, just a guess.
@@danieldronzek8616 Remek is a Czech guy. A backup cosmonaut Pelcak was Slovak nationality. You know, we were two nations in one country Czechoslovakia.
If you count nationalities like that, than I am sure Czechs would be way down the list of Russians, Ukrainians, Belorussians, Tatars and so on. Besides, what is the glory of being a passenger… Beer is good, though. For now.
@@dyadyaboba Sure. Most nationalities were in space not like pilots, but like specialists working on some project. Our cosmonaut Remek had a lot of work there too. Not much time to just enjoy lazy resting. And in those times (1978) also these passengers were trained to work as pilots. They spent about one year just by training a learning. He had to know all about the Souyz spaceship and a lot of about Saljut 6 orbital station. If something wrong happened and the captain had some health issue, the second guy needed to take over the guidance of the spaceship.
Бытовой отсек с отдельным туалетом все таки выглядит более комфортной идеей даже по сравнению с более современными концепциями новых пилотируемых кораблей.
@@NomTom They actually do! The first Space Shuttle to visit Mir brought along an adapter so it could dock and left it attached to the station for all the other Shuttle-Mir missions.
@@NomTom well they do, if they docking with Soviet/Russian orbital vessels, like one of first uses of adapters was on Soyuz-Apollo mission in 1975, when Apollo also had payload adapter to dock with Soyuz
It is also getting slowly more standarized since many countries copied (or licensed) the Soviet APAS system, and with international berthing port standards.
Obrigado Jared ! Eu sempre tive uma enorme curiosidade sobre o design e funções dos componentes da Soyus. Um grande vídeo ! Bem didático e explicativo. Vou deixá-lo salvo para futuras consultas e compartilhamos. Abraços.
10:50 nope The Holman transfer (2 engine burns) is only done once, the 2nd orbital transfer is called a Bielliptic transfer that requires 3 engine burns. The 3rd burn is the critical one as it sets Soyuz on to its near ISS orbit with enough speed. Watched the 3 videos “Journey to the ISS”
You and Animagraffs, straight into my veins please! It's like those vertical slice picture books as a kid where they showed Cruiseships and the like in detail. Absolutely love it!
FINALLY A VIDEO ON THE SOYUZ Ive been continously perfecting my Soyuz replica in the game SR2 for my ISS recreation, and even learned the history of the Soyuz to recreate old versions and even the LOK version for the moon Edit: I always thought the "Soyuz" name was a reference to the Soviet Union
An entire 15 minutes video is being Animated. That must be lot of pain. How many days of research, Modeling, Animating, Rendering and editing. Plz plz plz let me know. I'm a very big fan of you sir. That would make my day. Thanks Every single Frame Appreciated.
@@JaredOwen so now you have to hope this video can generate enough money to cover the cost of 2 months of living costs plus extra to compensate for your hard work
I’ve been in the space industry for my entire career and have never seen this explained so clearly. Well done!!
Thanks Bobby
@@JaredOwen *bobby*
@@JaredOwen *bobby*
@@JaredOwen *bobby*
@@JaredOwen Bobby
ESA did a video on how the Soyuz works a few years back, but yours is far more detailed and advanced. And now I know what those T and M and A abbreviations mean.
Thanks! The ESA one is fantastic and it definitely covers a few things that my video doesn't.
What's with aluminium oxide? Solidfuel?
@@idzkk PBAN and APCP
Hi Aluminium Oxide!!! I have seen your comment. I also subscribed to you.
@@JaredOwen keep up the great
Jared , just a request, please create more videos on science related topics , it literally helps out a lot of students as well as learners , and lemme tell you that your animations make every concept crystal clear . Thank you so much
Thanks PSD - I will see what I can do!
this is science...
@@AverageAlien this is kind of science that is specifically dealing with space .... I am talking about science that we use in day to day life.... Like he made a video on working of electric dc motor....
@@JaredOwen I am very confused on how the ISS narvigates the earth. Does the iss go round the earth such that at a time its above the earth and another time, the earth is above it? What is a free fall of the iss? Does the iss use energy to move round the Earth. An animation will definitely clear the illusion so many of us have
@@Tech.Library are you crazy
Thanks
Who else agree that this guy deserves much more for such amazing reascearch and animation. That clearly shows how much effort you put into it. Really impressive :]
Thanks Bruhh😎
Respect. Stellar documentary
Yes this is man really awesome deserve to much more subscriptions and appreciation.
true dat
@@JaredOwen compare 1930s Nazi Germany Vs 2020s Communist Chinazi IN YOUR NEXT VIDEO Project.
Парень, ты красавчик! Я живу в России и интересуюсь космосом. Но твой фильм - самый понятный и информативный из всех, что я видел! GREAT WORK, CAMRAD!
Я тоже не находил на Ютубе более качественного разбора корабля Союз.
За исключением моментов "лунной" программы...
Camrada
Наконец-то Яндекс ввел перевод и озвучку фильмов на лету, теперь даже все непонятное становится понятным. Супер канал!
@@user_55.6 TH-cam auto translate is not the best so that can happen
In some cases, the latest Soyuz modification can deliver crews to the ISS in 3 hours. And on the Progress ship, a flight for 1.30 hours will soon be tested, which will then be applied on the Soyuz.
True, they take less orbits to catch up with ISS
Nice, soon they can order Pizza and get it delivered still warm.
@@Xaito 20000$ pizza + free delivery
@@AmogusAbobusAutobusmore like 60$ pizza +10000$ shipping
pizza 5$ delivery 20000$
For people commenting: "it's a 50 years old rocket" no it's not, It not the same rocket, it has changed A LOT, the only thing that remains it's the name and the shape, also Russia is using the Proton-M rockets and the Angarah ones.
Yeah, but it’s the same Soyuz program. Apollo 1 and 16 are different yeah but they are both in the same mission of apollo
@TheDarkSide69420 It's funny though the soyuz is still flying and the u s used it for a decade because they didn't have anything to get to space.It's funny, though the Soyuz. Maybe the US should ask Russia or China to help them get their stranded astronauts from the space station..😂😂😂
@@fgk765jkh Илон Маск поможет 😂 Да уже помог НАСА справиться с проблемой транспорта. Союз только быстрее
Soyuz two point one A booster rocket is used today 🎉
What a really great video!! Sooo many impressively well-animated details! Keep up the great work.
Agreed
Chris Cassidy?
Indeed
Ok
I am your subscriber too @BranchEducation
I enjoy the way Jared simply talks into his microphone instead of shouting into it like so many other TH-camrs today. Makes for a pleasant listening experience.
YES VERY TRUE
why would he shout anyways? this is a explanatory video not a regular one so he is obv gonna talk calmly 🤦♂️
I never know the Soyuz was more than 40 years old and was originally intended for Lunar landing missions.
Sergei Korolev(The Soyuz Designer) is truly a 'miracle worker'
Cult of personality here. Korolev was certainly an accountable manager (and a harsh team leader, btw). Solo designer? Nope, not even close.
@@vladimirstarostenkov4417 they couldn't even get the N1 to work after Korolyov died. "Manager" my ass
The Korolev Cross is the coolest stage separation, and it’s not even close.
Над этим проэктом работали тысячи учёных, а не только Королев. Это если сейчас говорить, что Илон Маск создал SpaceX, и не говорить о тысячах учёных в его команде!
The first flight of the b-52 was in 1952...The last aircraft of the B-52 series was built in June 1962.))))So why are you surprised.These machines have also been modernized and improved over their history.😂
感谢您添加中文语音和字幕，您是一位认真而专业的科普博主，很喜欢您的视频。❤
谢谢
this is the stuff that easily passed as professional educator material, good job man
Thanks Arsyan
Best animations Jared, keep the space vids coming, can't wait for a Starship video!!!!!!!!!
@Littbit you bet he will once it's flying!!
@@soleenzo893 so u r saying, we'd have to wait for eternity...
@@jayesh1891 nah cmon you're a bit too pessimistic, you've seen how spacex progress. starship might not be fully orbitally capable in october but in a few years it'll be flying for sure. spacex are counting on it for starlink V2 deployment after all. human rated starships might take a while though, for sure.
Crew starship probably won't be a thing until around 2024 or maybe 2025 though, before that it'll all be cargo starship launches.
Same
It still blows my mind that we're able to fire people off the face of the planet and they dock onto a craft that's wizzing around up in space. I can't even dock my key into the front door lock on the first 3 attempts per entry.
one word:
lmao
Awesome work you do as well my friend
@Stephen Beck-von-Peccoz Bro WTF?
@Stephen Beck-von-Peccoz BRUH MAYBE HE JUST DOESN’T HAVE GOOD HAND EYE COORDINATION. JUST BECAUSE SOMEONE CAN’T PUT A KEY IN A LOCK DOESN’T MEAN THAT THEIR AN ALCHOHOLIC
@Stephen Beck-von-Peccoz 🤣🤣🤣🤣 you guys made this comment section hilarious
In Malaysia we have a first astronaut “Dr.Sheikh Muszaphar Shukor” launched to the ISS aboard Soyuz TMA-11 on 10 October 2007….greeting from Malaysia guys🇲🇾🤗
fake astronaft
The Soyuz spacecraft has been my favorite spacecraft so far. I really have learned a lot about the Soyuz in this video. Great job
Thank you! This video was a lot of fun to make
@@JaredOwen No problem
Now Soyuz takes only 3 hours to reach the ISS! "The Russian Soyuz MS-17 spacecraft carrying NASA astronaut Kate Rubins and Russian cosmonauts Sergey Ryzhikov and Sergey Kud-Sverchkov docked with the space station at 4:48 a.m. EDT (0848 GMT), just 3 hours and 3 minutes after lifting off from the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan on a Soyuz rocket."
@@Niksky2 thanks for that info
Великолепное видео! Спасибо за такой сложный и детальный труд!
Я знаю, что он мой любимый ютубер!
*help*
I love the Soyuz. Its amazing how long the basic design has endured. The spacecraft is old, but the rocket, from the R-7 family, is older still. You can look at what launched Sputnik in the 1950s and its pretty much the same rocket.
LOL they are not the same spacecraft and not the same rocket. Just like the author explained, there have been many major modifications and revisions.
Soyuz has been setting world records for orbital docking because it has extremely reliable and precise launch sequence. That's thanks to new hardware and automation they got in 2016. And Soyuz 2.1b upper stage uses RD-0124 engine that first flew in 2006 and has vacuum efficiency (ISP) of 359 seconds, far surpassing anything else kerosene based. For example, SpaceX Merlin vacuum engine has 348 seconds ISP.
Just because something looks the same doesn't mean its the same. Modern Soyuz is the most reliable, precise and efficient piloted spacecraft currently operational. It is a vast improvement over 1960's version.
Russian space tehcnology of course👍
@@mitua604 come on you dont have to be that guy
russians know how to build simple technology that gets the job done. simple means that not a lot can go wrong and that it doesn't go out of date quickly. it's something I wish other countries would learn to do.
Don't touch if it's work
Спасибо за вашу работу. Прекрасное видео!
Согласен
Ты, имбецил? Он с первых же минут врёт, союз не лунный корабль и космическая гонка шла до первого полёта человека в космос, а не выдуманной американцамт "лунной гонки"
@@МойАккаунт-ъ6и имбецил тут только ты. Изначально союз разрабатывался в рамках программы полёта к луне, быдлоид необразованный. И лунная гонка - часть космической гонки, которая не закончилась только лишь полётом человека в космос
Это не его работа. Это голимый искуственный интелект
@@Виктор-ф8ц7я идиоты изучили новое слово? и теперь им везде ИИ мерещится. Видосы парень сам пилит и из Блендера не вылазиет, тут только перевод на Русский через ИИ. Назови мне хоть один ИИ который такую графику делает? лол
When you are modeling any curved surfaces with geometry like here with the periscope and windows (6:50), I know that the norm is to use as few polys as needed to convey shape, but sometimes it is very visible on the final render, what I've realized over time is that regardless of the program if you increase the number of polys by 2, 4, 8, 16 or even more only on those sections (if you decide not to use masked textures), it usually doesn't really affect performance or render time as much if at all, but if it does affect try to attach as many separate geometries into a single object because that decreases the number of calls to memory, with this technique I've managed to have entire cities modeled in detail light as a feather on the viewport where otherwise I couldn't get a single block of houses when they had all their elements separated. I LOVE the thoroughness you show on your projects!!! Cheers!!!
This is some of the highest quality educational content I’ve ever seen on TH-cam. Keep it up!
I hope someday we’ll get to see animations for Orion, starliner, starship, and dragon!
Also, I’m impressed you’ve already updated your ISS module to include nauka!
Thanks Michael - I'm going to keep making these space animations so stay tuned!
AND WITH A CLEAR ND NOT LOUD VOICE.. A VERY RARE ASSET TODAY
AND ALSO A CLEAR ENGLISH NOT AFFECTED BY AMERICAN SLANG AS IT IS FOR MANY MANY SPEAKERS IN YOU TOBE VIDEOS
Отличное видео! Уверен многим будет интересно увидеть подобные сюжеты и по другим космическим программам.
@@littlewing3966 как ты относишься к Мураеву? Или ты зомбак и говорить не умеешь?
@@littlewing3966 Вы хоть отдаете себе отчет, что Ваш этот комментарий, именно вот здесь, -выглядит в крайней степени иронично...
@@littlewing3966 и$иот
@@head3k в что там было?
@@UnQuacker да, украинский политик, грамотный тип. Хотелось бы Украине такого. В нашу сторону (России) не смотрит. Говорит красиво, заслуги есть, но к сожалению, у него нет связи ни с силовиками, ни с армией. А жаль.
ПослеСлов: мне жалко советское наследие и пусть оно не достанется нам то, хотя бы не пропадет.
Лежу, смотрю на иностранном канале с русскими субтитрами видео про наши " Союзы " 😁. Спасибо, автор! 👍
Уже неплохую нейросеточную озвучку прикрутили!
@@Дрывня_та_Нызалыжня_ВукраыняА, так это нейросеть озвучила?
@@user-abush_008 Да, обрати внимание, как она в озвучивании чисел парится. Интересно, почему это так сложно
Тоже лежу на диване...Видео понравилось. Системно ! .Информативно !. Красочно !.😊
🤝🤝🤝🙂
I've never seen anything this complex explained so clearly and simply. The visuals are beautiful. Fantastic work.
За 15 минут о Союзе узнал больше, чем на отечественных каналах. Спасибо!
похожее видео было от европейского агентства. Но не такое красивое.
У наших космоблогеров полно таких роликов, стоит просто поискать...
@@vozDushnyjzmej I would love to see it, give me the links please 🙏🙏
@@heybudi maybe th-cam.com/users/tvroscosmosfeatured
Естественно емли ты отечественные не смотришь . Он не упомянул что америкмнский сегмент мкс Зоря был спроектирован и построем в России
I have been fascinated with spaceflight in general and Soyuz in particular for as long as I can remember. This video is stunning, and right up my alley, thank you!!!
Thank you!
I have to admit that the Soyuz is still the most convenient mini-ship for getting people into orbit. It's still better than the Crew-Dragon, whose passengers are forced to urinate (and poop) in a small container right above their helmets, instead of being secluded in a separate compartment (to even powder your nose), like in the Soyuz. In the head of the designers of this spacecraft was the idea of a submarine, where all systems should help the survival of the crew.
У штатов в принцепе с унитазами не задалось, достаточно вспомнить, как часто он ломается на их модуле на МКС и как их космонавтам приходится бегать в нашу половину.
@@_lazure_6051 You just wonder how many nappies NASA astronauts used when "flying" to the Moon!
Obviously, your thinking is still stuck in the last century
Keep in mind part of this may stem from the fact that the Soyus takes 1 less person. Gives more space for that.
@@teresar6348 Agree. And the Soyuz can't be reused.
One of the best space-related videos on the entire TH-cam. Masterfully done, sir! Love from Czechia!
Jared I like the fact that you replaced the Pirs docking port with Nauka - good catch!
Yeah I saw that too
Thanks! The docking happened right when I was in the middle of making this animation
@@JaredOwen some pure dedication there my guy
@@JaredOwen You forgot to make the station spin uncontrollably! xD
I noticed that as well. One update from me though - I believe Soyuz docks now even within 3 hours, not 6. Nevertheless this video is great work and great source of knowledge, so thanks for making it.
Small issue in the orbital animations: Both the orbital and angular velocity decrease with the orbital radius (and thus height). So when the Soyuz is below the ISS, it should be slightly faster and also also complete a single orbit faster. This is essential for understanding docking, e.g. why the Soyuz launches _after_ the ISS passes above and why to catch up with the ISS you don't need to accelerate, you just need to wait in a lower orbit. On the other hand, accelerating prograde raises your orbit, but at the same time slows you down. Admittedly, 250 km and 500 km don't differ much in terms of the earths radius and thus their orbital speed is quite similar, but to me it looked in your animations almost like the angular velocity of all spacecraft was the same. On addition to exaggerating the difference in orbital heights, I would have exaggerated the speed of the lower spacecraft to bring the point across, which I in theory learned during my physics degree but internalised while playing KSP
Thanks Michael - you are right, that is a critical part of Rendezvous and Docking. I was afraid the video was getting too long so I decided to cut that part out
Excellent conceptual observation and explanation 👏👏
Love the orbiter 2010 version of this craft. First thing I ever used to dock with. Now the principles of rendezvous make much more sense.
Türkiye'de astronomi eğitimi alanında doktora yapıyorum. Öğrenciler için temel astronomi konularıyla ilgili öğretim materyalleri hazırlıyorum. Bu sırada videolarınıza denk geldim ve çok başarılı buldum. Bu videoları derslerde öğrencilere göstererek uzay teknolojilerinin nasıl çalıştıklarını onlara daha kolay anlatabiliriz. Bu başarılı içerikleri hazırlamak için gösterdiğiniz gayretlerden dolayı teşekkür ederim.
That’s awesome that you got Chris Cassidy and Scott Kelly to consult on this! Amazing video!
I love the Russian philosophy in solving engineering problems, compared to us in the US. Russian systems are simple, tough and long lasting. Ours happen to be precise but very sensitive and pretty.
Even when you take a look at their Airforce planes. Ours have extremely advanced avionics but require enormous maintenance for the skin and have to be cautious in bad weather because of skin peeling off; also FOD.
Russians on the other hand designed their planes tough, can take off and land in sand storms
So fascinating!!
I called it Russian quality
yeah,but i am kinda sad that i have tobuse intel/amd cpus instead of russians elbrus, i hope soon elbrus cpus will be more for people
It's interesting since part of the reason why they have lost the space race was because their rocket design was too complex, the N1 rocket was powered by 30 engines which made it too unreliable. There are examples of complex Russian military projects, some of which were produced, for example when it comes to planes:
ANT-20 - soviet interwar heavy bomber powered by 8 engines (Its development, the TB-6 was supposed to be a super heavy bomber powered by 12 engines)
Su-5 - a mixed propeller and jet plane
Lun-class ekranoplan - a 286 ton ground effect plane classified as a ship
VVA-14 - a soviet military ekranoplan that was also meant to later have VTOL capability
Yak-38 - soviet VTOL plane
Ka-50 - an attack helicopter with 2 counterrotating rotors
Su-47 - a reverse wing fighter plane requiring complex controls
There is also the Buran space shuttle that was more advanced than the American space shuttle, but the project was too expensive. There are also quite a lot of non-aircraft soviet experimental vehicles, for example one of the cooler ones was TES-3, soviet mobile tracked nuclear reactor.
I suppose the Russian simplicity is mainly a result of their leadership philosophy which recognises that they shouldn't spend too much money on mass producing too expensive, unreliable, experimental designs.
Чувак, это Советский Союз, тут от современной России только программное обеспечение и то не факт)))
@@augustekrone1566 да ладно тебе так гнать сразу
Do you understand how talented you are and how much you’ve revolutionized learning mechanics for those trying to learn? Thank you from the bottom of my heart
Thank you Zachary!
you dont understand that he had and have 2-3 mil subscribers ? this number is not coming from nowhere when he had no talent :D
e² Σπ
.6500-+Ω
π÷√² ×
Terima kasih kerana menggunakan Bahasa Melayu untuk video ini dan kami rakyat Malaysia suka dan faham dengan apa yang disampaikan melalui ucapan yang jelas😊
Really well done! I remember getting to pick out a model at the hobby store on a trip to the coast with my folks at 11yrs old in 1975. I picked out the "Apollo-Soyuz Mission Commemorative Model" but could not figure out anything about the Soyuz part nor how it worked and who went where (nor could my Dad, an aerospace engineer). Now I finally know, and the Soviets have such a novel and unique approach to things.
I am an amateur space enthusiast and knew quite a bit about the Soyuz capsule but this just explained it all in 15 minutes! Thank you
Отличная работа! То, что нужно для популяризации космической тематики в мире. Thanks from Russia!
Пожалуйста!
космической тематики в мире ? да это старое гавно по сравнению с тем что делает маск
@@Алекс-к5ц5ъ Сказал, как в лужу пёрнул.
@@Алекс-к5ц5ъ я не хочу тебя расстроить, но каких-то принципиально новых технологий в crew dragon не используется, он выглядит безусловно необычно, не более. Если ты говоришь про starship, то там те же жрд, материалы корпуса и комплектующих, но масштабы больше в несколько раз. Стар союз если только внешним видом. Он используется для запуска на НОО и делает это отлично, пусть наша космонавтика сейчас явно отстаёт, но называть союз-старым говном, это признак твоей неграмотности в космонавтике.
Маск вешает лапшу на уши про 1 000 000 людей на марсе в ближайшие десятилетия(эту глупость разоблачили конечно), использует космос для маркетинговых целей своих компаний, я не говорю про то, что он недавно писал в твиттере.
Противопоставь что-либо мне, я готов поспорить
@@Алекс-к5ц5ъ представляешь-"святой маск" отказался от американской системы возвращаемых Шатлов и перешел ровно на ту же систему,что и использовал СССР и Россия-запуск космического корабля на ракете,стыковка к МКС,отстыковка от МКС и вход в атмосферу Земли так же как это делает Советский космос уже 60 лет-используя термощит,а не с ...ые плитки из-за которых погиб экипаж "Коламбуса"!И так же после входа в атмосферу в низкие ее слои открывается парашют-ровно так же как это ху....у тучу лет делают на Союзах!И еще так же как на Союзах у Драгона появилась точно такая же система спасения экипажа как у Союза!И которая полностью отсутствовала на "Шатлах"!Так что правильно тебе ответили-ляпнул как в лужу ...нул!.. ;)
Спасибо за твои отличные видео! Ждём разных новых ещё! 👍👍👍
Спасибо! Я всегда работаю над новым контентом 😊
Soyuz launch animation: th-cam.com/video/_v7YgDum2Sg/w-d-xo.html
For more videos like one check out my space playlist: th-cam.com/play/PLgVMn8k8t5JNeGds2KjPLXh37Y2oHuKHW.html
:•
Clicked as sone as got notification
You interest me...
i love your work, Owen 💜
Im exited
I love how thorough and detailed this video is. The orbital animation really helped me to understand how they move up or down in orbital positions. I can really tell you put a lot of effort into this video. Thanks. I learned a lot.
Soyuz. The Soviet masterpiece of the space age technologies. Soviet era masterpiece,still working perfectly fine
Has been redesigned several times.
@@RideAcrossTheRiver *updated (of course back then they didnt have the tech we have today)
@@BrunoSantos-lm1pz I dunno ... it just seems stagnated.
@@RideAcrossTheRiver If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Soviet tech may have been behind US tech, but it's *solid*
@@mooniejohnson Soyuz has broken several times and has been redesigned several times. But it's bare minimum.
Finally! An excellently described and perfectly animated description of the SOYUZ....Thank You
You are welcome Nyck. Thank you!
Cosmonaut "κόσμος" + "ναύτης" that is, "floating in space," "driving ships in space." Agree, this is more logical, isn't it? Especially considering that cosmonauts really control a spaceship in space, and not on the star "Αστέρας", as in the case of an astronaut)
@Living Soul wow, wow,wow! I`m marxist and materialist. Relax, man )
They are in Russia
it literally means universe sailor. It was a name given to Russian astronauts.
astronaut can mean star sailor. Someone who sails BETWEEN the stars. A little more cool, at least in english, if you ask me.
@@moonasha nobody ask you. Cosmos is ful of stars!
Astro-naut are the Greek words for "star” and “sailor"
Cosmo-naut are Greek words for "cosmos" "sailor"
Thank you, it bugged me when he said it just means Russian Astronaut.
Underrated
A Chinese astronaut instead is called Taikonaut. From the world "tàikōngrén", meaning "Spaceman".
But in Chinese, the official word means "Heaven Navigator"
@@antoniousai1989 ooh. I was wondering if anyone used "the heavens" to name their space explores.
Thanks for that bit of info.
@@robertalaverdov8147 your welcome.
It bugged me to, than I realized not everyone knows the meanings behind their names.
As a student studying Aerospace engineering, I must point out that your explanations are very friendly and accurate:)
Dear friends, can you imagine what we could achieve by working together and trusting each other? What an unthinkable stupidity to be at enmity instead of going forward... I hope you and I will see peace and friendship in our lives... Peace and good to all!! Many thanks to the author for the work done!
You see, most of the space stuff was created because of the Space Race. Without it, it would be impossible to explain people why governments spend hundreds of billions of tax money for some space junk instead of improving healthcare, education etc. People DO NEED competition to complete truly great projects.
Сильные мира сего думают иначе. Спасибо Вам за правильные слова, простые люди хотят мира!
Дружба с америкой сравнимо с самоубийством.
@@aur485а зачем отсвечивать своей глупостью на весь ютуб?
Я не знаю зачем ты отсвечиваешь.@@alexanderalexander7908
I am positively amazed with the quality of your videos...
This is the third one I'm watching and you really do have a talent for explaining technical things in a way anyone can understand...
Great work 🙂🙂🙂
The Apollo-Soyuz Test Project was only so called in the USA. The USSR and most of the Eastern Bloc countries simply called it "Soyuz-Apollo".
In Russian it was Soyuz-Apollon witn N at the end with stress on the last syllable. And there were cigarettes of the same name en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo-Soyuz_(cigarette)
@@paruhblgen4222 - I knew that the Soviets called it Soyuz-Apollon if you transliterate directly from the Cyrillic. Given that the video seems targeted mostly towards an American audience, I decided to translate the name instead of transliterate it. Besides, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary and Romania all called the Apollo programme "Apollo", not Apollon; and I was including all of the Eastern Bloc, not just the USSR.
@@paruhblgen4222 - The cigarette is new to me, though.
Это из-за удобства произношения всего лишь
"For the sake of convenience"
I love the soyuz, its just so functional
Finally understand some of the more nuanced elements - thank you.
Definition of 'if it ain't broke, don't fix it'
Soviet era tech summarized
На самом деле от старого союза там осталось название и оболочка.
Его модернизировали много раз, чтобы теперь он мог долетать за 3 часа.
Расчёты на технике 40 летней давности не позволяли делать это так быстро. Как и координировать работу двигателей как теперь.
Same with Boeing
I love how scientists from US and Russia work together in space missions
as well as business people and everyone else excluding small group of elites. hmm 🤔
Amogus like if you agree
@@darxray Надеюсь когда нибудь настанет время когда эти свиньи (олигархи, миллионеры, политики, корпорации) не будут мешать дружбе всех народов. Нам, простым людям нечего делить
@@f1shyspace 0 likes💀
It's really amazing to see you doing all these animations, and explaining it in simple terms for us to understand. I also love how you share what tools you are using to do all these, for example for this video, the Skillshare platform. Very impressive.
Very interesting video !
thank you Jared .
I loved the updated ISS with the new nauka module ¡great detail! Love these animations BTW, i was expecting to see more of your gorgeous ISS model
these animations are a fantastic resource for us parents trying to find material that will both engage and enrich our young children, not to mention it is an amazing product of your meticulous research and effort. Thank you so much and please don't stop!!
How did you get your children this interested in space to watch such a good video?
@@favesongslist I told her to sit down or else
@@jasperzanjani I have 4 grown children, one is doing a Phd in Aeronautical engineering and wants to become an astronaut, one has a MSC in computing and AI, yet none could I get interested enough to want to sit through this and take it in, despite its quality.
@@favesongslist if your daughter is an aeronautical engineer then maybe you should be asking for recommendations rather than giving them
@@jasperzanjani She is clever and has her own mind, gifted in maths but does not like maths. So I am pleased the direction she wants to go in, Yet it is of limited direction from me. Maybe I inspired her more than taught her, the maths certainly is way over my head. I always found it hard to get my kids to sit down with me.
I just wanna say I appreciate how you updated your ISS model to include the new Nauka module. It's a small detail but I appreciate it
Danke!
Now Soyuz Reach The Space Station In Only 3 Hours.
This is an incredibly impressive animation. If you’re at university, any NASA center would absolutely hire you for a pathway internship. There are so many mission concepts that need a skilled animator to bring them to life.
CGI is the life. Sorry
@@StarNumbers I smell flat earther
@@adammaher6601
I think you like Peter Pan -- never grow up in the never-never land
Nah mate. That's you
@@StarNumbers Basement dweller spotted
This is insane, Jared! I love the animations, storytelling and of course, above all, deep expertise
Thanks Filip!
^
|
|
Best person in world
7:15 Notice how the hatches always open inward so that pressurei inside the spacecraft pushes the and keeps the hatch closed. It’s failsafe and iimpossible for a hatch to burst open while in space. This is unlike in movies and TV where spacecraft hatches and airlock doors always seem to open inside out. (Impossible)
same as airliner doors...
Well.. the crew dragon hatch opens to the outside so it's not impossible. It's just not conventional
@@WuffiePhoenix The crew dragon hatch opens outwards due to lessons learned on Apollo 1.
Мне было интересно смотреть, узнал о Союзах много нового, видно что автор старался)
он и правда молодец :)
так и да)
Старался оболгать. Он с первых же минут врёт, союз не лунный корабль и космическая гонка шла до первого полёта человека в космос, а не выдуманной американцамт "лунной гонки".
Your videos are amazing! U deserve way more subscribers. I can’t imagine the work that goes in to animating and researching these videos! Keep it up mate!
Большое спасибо создателям фильма. Получила ответы на многие вопросы, которые меня интересовали. И только в этом фильме.
I really think Soyuz was very much ahead of its time! The Space Lada is everlasting
Lada is cheap but it breaks too often. Soyuz on the other hand is the most reliable spacecraft ever built so far.
Великолепная работа автора! Спасибо!
I was really into space for most of my childhood. It's cool to see behind the curtain a bit more. Great animation as always! =)
Thank you Eric!
Thankyou Jared!
If I may in light of your superb video's about Soyuz, may I add that Cosmonaut Yulia Peresild has added even more interest in Soyuz by making the movie The Challenge around Soyuz flights SM-19 assent and SM18 return, and her 12 days on the ISS!
I have been advised by another TH-camr that the movie The Challenge, is expected to take less than a year from her 17 October 2021 Soyuz landing to be completed. Yulia Peresild is one of Russia's most loved and accomplished actresses, I always love her internationally acclaimed leading role in and movie The Battle for Sevastopol. Yulia played the Russian Staff Sergeant, promoted Officer Luydmila Pavlichenko (Hero of the Soviet Union) severely injured in the siege's of Odessa, and Sevastopol and who then took part in a tour of the US to encourage America to open a second front against fascism in WW2. American First Lady Mrs Eleanor Roosevelt embraced the world famous Pavlichenko and made her a guest at the White House while in Washington... a well publicised story at the time and a part of US/Russian history. Yulia was great, now standby fof her role in The Challenge!
Cheers!
Have you already watched the movie? It's already released.
@@aur485
Good day! No I haven't, I cant find it anywhere to watch.
@@AussieMaleTuber Maybe on torrent sites? In the English adaptation the film is called "The Challenge"
@@aur485
Not found so far! And I can't get a Russian visa to go to Moscow to look for it with English sub-titles.
Говно фильм. И Юлия Пересильд посредственная актриса, ее не очень то и любят в России.
Thank you for covering this. I’ve always been fascinated by the space industry. To say your videos are incredible is an understatement!
Also, The Everyday Astronaut has been working on a big video project on the history of Soviet rocket engines and their design. The wealth of knowledge on TH-cam is fantastic.
Thanks norweeg - I enjoy Everyday Astronaut videos!
I love his videos too
An absolutely fantastic video, I've been wanting something like this for ages.
Slight mistake: The Kurs system expects the drogue to be facing retrograde along the orbit, so for docking to a nadir port such as on Rassvet like you show here, the ISS will rotate around such that the port points retrograde. However this is really not recorded anywhere so I don't blame you for missing it.
Bonus fact: The Soyuz's on-orbit lifetime is limited by the degradation of the peroxide in it's landing thrusters to about 200 days.
Second bonus fact: Rassvet is the only Russian orbital section hardware to have been launched on a US launch vehicle
Thanks for watching and commenting Lewis!
@@JaredOwen ya
You are space shuttle from space agency
@@aviationairways_real ok?...
@@aviationairways_real it’s based on res space shuttle
With animation, it is easier and enjoyable to see and understand how do things work. Great job. Greetings from Brazil 🇧🇷❤
Thank you!
Thanks to the built-in voice translation, I can watch your videos in Russian. Thanks for the quality content!
Great video. Missing the Cuban flag for Soyuz 38 with Arnaldo Tamayo, first Latin American and first person of African heritage to go to orbit.
Arnaldo Tamayo Mendez, if I recall correctly.
This is the very best explanation of my favorite spacecraft. Thank you, Jared!!
soyuz also has meanings like the union of husband and wife, or the union of several countries.
The best video on Soyuz on TH-cam
Perfect use of animations to make such an impressive detailed video!!
Thank you!
@@JaredOwen 😂 his name was hard so only thank you
LOL
Super job !!! Formidable et pationnant. Merci beaucoup.
Great!
Это ж надо так постараться , всё разузнать до мелочей, потом детально и красиво нарисовать, анимировать... Автор молодец
ну голос вроде как ни детский а союза выкройки как и шатлов и прочих конструкций в журналов моделистов ... корабли вообщем точно есть.
Not 6 hours but 3 hours: Russians express jurney is improved so well that they can get from start to docking to ISS in just three hours!
And one mistake: The third nationality in space after Soviets and Americans were Czechs. In 1978 on Soyuz 28 flight to Salyut 6 orbital station, cosmonauts Alexej Gubarev from Russia and Vladimir Remek, Czech nationality. Polish flag is missing there too.
Vietnam is missing too. We're the first non-Soviet Asian country to travel cosmonaut into space thanks to the USSR international program (Soyuz 37.)
Maybe this list in the video is only countries after 1991? I'm not sure, just a guess.
Minor thing: Remek was actually from Czechoslovakia.
@@danieldronzek8616 Remek is a Czech guy. A backup cosmonaut Pelcak was Slovak nationality. You know, we were two nations in one country Czechoslovakia.
If you count nationalities like that, than I am sure Czechs would be way down the list of Russians, Ukrainians, Belorussians, Tatars and so on. Besides, what is the glory of being a passenger… Beer is good, though. For now.
@@dyadyaboba Sure. Most nationalities were in space not like pilots, but like specialists working on some project. Our cosmonaut Remek had a lot of work there too. Not much time to just enjoy lazy resting. And in those times (1978) also these passengers were trained to work as pilots. They spent about one year just by training a learning. He had to know all about the Souyz spaceship and a lot of about Saljut 6 orbital station. If something wrong happened and the captain had some health issue, the second guy needed to take over the guidance of the spaceship.
Бытовой отсек с отдельным туалетом все таки выглядит более комфортной идеей даже по сравнению с более современными концепциями новых пилотируемых кораблей.
This video is beautiful. You do a better job than NASA website. Outstanding quality and information 👍
It warms my heart to see the different country docking systems on the ISS are non-compatible... Just like our power outlets
I wonder if they have adapters
@@NomTom They actually do! The first Space Shuttle to visit Mir brought along an adapter so it could dock and left it attached to the station for all the other Shuttle-Mir missions.
@@NomTom well they do, if they docking with Soviet/Russian orbital vessels, like one of first uses of adapters was on Soyuz-Apollo mission in 1975, when Apollo also had payload adapter to dock with Soyuz
It is also getting slowly more standarized since many countries copied (or licensed) the Soviet APAS system, and with international berthing port standards.
They all need a single port for all like usb C
Офигенный ролик! Классные термины, графика, рассказ! Спасибо огромное! :)))
Да не термины, а определения.)))
Obrigado Jared ! Eu sempre tive uma enorme curiosidade sobre o design e funções dos componentes da Soyus. Um grande vídeo !
Bem didático e explicativo. Vou deixá-lo salvo para futuras consultas e compartilhamos. Abraços.
Obrigado!
You have to admit. It is a very well designed space craft and has a great record of being very dependable... 👍
Soyuz is actually safest orbit delivery system out there. (for now) it has a fail safe procedures at avery stage of the flight.
Muchas gracias Jared. Eres el mejor youtuber divulgador de ciencia y creatividad de la animación. TH-cam debería premiarte por ello.
10:50 nope
The Holman transfer (2 engine burns) is only done once, the 2nd orbital transfer is called a Bielliptic transfer that requires 3 engine burns. The 3rd burn is the critical one as it sets Soyuz on to its near ISS orbit with enough speed.
Watched the 3 videos “Journey to the ISS”
You and Animagraffs, straight into my veins please! It's like those vertical slice picture books as a kid where they showed Cruiseships and the like in detail. Absolutely love it!
Soyuz makes space X look like science fiction. Like the difference between a model T car and a Corvette StingRay
But it works and works well!
Only time with tell if SpaceX can match its safety record...
Ayo awesome vid Jared! I’m Russian, and we pronounce Soyuz like saYOOZ and not SOYooz. Again, great vid nevertheless.
Thanks Benny - I figured Americans would pronounce it a bit different. Glad you like the video!
@@JaredOwen Yep! No problem
You pronounce it sayuz but soyuz is more right and not wrong, a-kanje is new thing in russian languge...
a Slav should pronounce how he writes, and write how he pronounces, that is what makes him a Slav
He's American
Great animation and accurate information! Thanks from Russia. How about the latest one and a half hour maneuver from start to docking?
Джаред! Вы -- лучше всех! Hi from Gambia!
FINALLY A VIDEO ON THE SOYUZ
Ive been continously perfecting my Soyuz replica in the game SR2 for my ISS recreation, and even learned the history of the Soyuz to recreate old versions and even the LOK version for the moon
Edit: I always thought the "Soyuz" name was a reference to the Soviet Union
@Luciana Rotty ye
@Luciana Rotty Sovjetskij
An entire 15 minutes video is being Animated. That must be lot of pain.
How many days of research, Modeling, Animating, Rendering and editing. Plz plz plz let me know. I'm a very big fan of you sir. That would make my day. Thanks
Every single Frame Appreciated.
Thank you! Total time was almost 2 months of full time effort. It was worth it though
@@JaredOwen
It is, thanks for the great upload
@@JaredOwen so now you have to hope this video can generate enough money to cover the cost of 2 months of living costs plus extra to compensate for your hard work
I love your content especially the daily life objectives like the fan and pen
Your video is translated to my native language, thx
Спасибо за видео. Очень доступно и понятно.
Die Russen (kennen nichts) so läuft die Propaganda Lernt euch 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂