Every Stop a Shipping Container Makes from China to Chicago | WIRED

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ธ.ค. 2021
  • The global pandemic triggered sky-high spending on manufactured goods. This increased spending created a huge bottleneck in the supply chain that could last for years. WIRED takes a look at the journey of a single shipping container; and with the help of supply chain analyst Lora Cecere, breaks down all the roadblocks a shipping container will encounter in 2021 and beyond.
    Still haven’t subscribed to WIRED on TH-cam? ►► wrd.cm/15fP7B7
    Listen to the Get WIRED podcast ►► link.chtbl.com/wired-ytc-desc
    Want more WIRED? Get the magazine ►► subscribe.wired.com/subscribe...
    Follow WIRED:
    Instagram ►► / wired
    Twitter ►► / wired
    Facebook ►► / wired
    Get more incredible stories on science and tech with our daily newsletter: wrd.cm/DailyYT
    Also, check out the free WIRED channel on Roku, Apple TV, Amazon Fire TV, and Android TV.
    ABOUT WIRED
    WIRED is where tomorrow is realized. Through thought-provoking stories and videos, WIRED explores the future of business, innovation, and culture.
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 482

  • @rawhide303
    @rawhide303 2 ปีที่แล้ว +507

    I was a longshoreman in Seattle for a few years, never made it into the union. I was shocked at the lack of technology, it felt like things hadn't changed since the 70's.

    • @nobody....168
      @nobody....168 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Can I ask how much did you earn at that time?

    • @babyg220
      @babyg220 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@nobody....168 average in the 60 thousands py

    • @14bqdonk
      @14bqdonk 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@babyg220 py?

    • @babyg220
      @babyg220 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@14bqdonk per year

    • @michaelrmurphy2734
      @michaelrmurphy2734 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That was because of the unions protecting jobs. Good for them, I say. My father was in the union here,
      but he was a supervisor. He was making up the scheduling and getting the "gangs" in.
      He made his career on the waterfront. I can only wonder what he would think of this.

  • @dron2336
    @dron2336 2 ปีที่แล้ว +218

    I’ve been to the port in Shanghai, it’s amazing. It’s huge and almost fully autonomous.

    • @JigilJigil
      @JigilJigil 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I've been almost in all China's ports, Shanghai too, it's huge and it's a mess, to some degree automated but it still a mess, all China's ports are mess depsite the huge investment, size and their considerable output, in real world pretty hard to manage ports with huge input and output, no matter where.

    • @TKOfromJohn
      @TKOfromJohn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      @@JigilJigil it's one of the largest, busiest ports in the world of course it's going to be a mess

    • @rcl998
      @rcl998 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      @@JigilJigil well, I think it's better than Long beach, at least the supply shortage due to logistic is mostly caused on US port not Chinese port

    • @danielch6662
      @danielch6662 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      Shanghai was over 40 million TEUs in 2020. Long Beach would be about 9 million TEUs in 2021. They somehow managed to expand fast enough to keep up with demand. US ports, not so much. We know where the bottleneck is. It's a function of the national government being willing to spend money to build infrastructure. In the US, there is a log jam caused by political bickering.

    • @enzhus
      @enzhus 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Port of Shanghai handled more containers (43,500,000 TEUs) in 2020 than top 4 US seaports, LA, Long Beach, New York and Savannah combined (29,499,000 TEUs)

  • @OwenRULESSS
    @OwenRULESSS 2 ปีที่แล้ว +82

    It is simply not true that 1-5% of containers fall into the ocean. She said this at 4:29
    “A WSC study found a tiny fraction, about .0006%” fall into the ocean

    • @marcusinternet
      @marcusinternet 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      thank you that seemed very high to me

    • @cryingwater
      @cryingwater 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      I think she meant if the ship loses containers. Then it will be around 1-5%

    • @emitting
      @emitting 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The number 1 to 5 % of containers fell off into the sea is wrong. Insurance cost for shipment is 1 % of cost of goods. I don't think insurance company will charge 1% if the lady quoted number 1-5% is correct.

    • @stephenmubanga7711
      @stephenmubanga7711 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      0006% is subjective (qualitative) data and 1-6% is objective (quantitative) data

    • @josephkowalczyk7459
      @josephkowalczyk7459 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      This whole thing is riddled with inaccuracies.

  • @wmercer7234
    @wmercer7234 2 ปีที่แล้ว +520

    It's insane that all of this is still cheaper than just making the goods here in the US

    • @djefr
      @djefr 2 ปีที่แล้ว +78

      They didnt really empasize enough how key the standardisation of the container is to keeping costs down. They made each step sound very complex, but in truth this whole system is extremely efficient and streamlined towards reducing costs at every step.

    • @Into_Ingrid
      @Into_Ingrid 2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      @@djefr While totally failing to be efficient at actually getting the goods where they need to be on time. The wonders of capitalism!
      And yes, I get that there's a pandemic going on, but it sounds like these issues should've been solved long ago.

    • @Sonic1575
      @Sonic1575 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      @@Into_Ingrid This has more to do with increased demand for imported goods. It's very efficient, it's just the infrastructure cannot be upgraded in such a short time to answer this increase.

    • @jsoe81657
      @jsoe81657 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      You think about it and it makes sense. The US doesn't have raw materials and other countries do.

    • @victoriancu7358
      @victoriancu7358 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Some products simply can't be made in the usa. Some products simply can't be made in china. That's why global trade exists. China relies heavily on some of our exports.

  • @alexbroere2669
    @alexbroere2669 2 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    As a Dutch citizen I'm proud of the port of Rotterdam. Together with Schiphol a great asset.

    • @mihovillmisha9885
      @mihovillmisha9885 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Just do not send your worthless degenerate soldiers to be part of un force to defend anybody.

  • @Pwn3dbyth3n00b
    @Pwn3dbyth3n00b 2 ปีที่แล้ว +62

    So basically the solution is trains but nobody wants to invest a large amount for a good solution for the long term. Politicians just want easy cheap fixes now which needs to be replaced frequently, ending up costing more in the long run.

    • @callummclachlan4771
      @callummclachlan4771 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Yep. Short term gains, "It'll be obsolete in a decade. But I won't be in power, so who cares."

    • @kurosakibell9982
      @kurosakibell9982 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      This's exactly why "China's belt and road initiative is the best project in the history of mankind"
      .
      People don't understand how this will make life so much bett r for everyone involve....

    • @gavinjohnson8063
      @gavinjohnson8063 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Most long distance overland freight in America is already sent by train.

    • @independentmediaassociation
      @independentmediaassociation 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah which is a shame because build all that infrastructure creates jobs in the short term

    • @wanderingfido
      @wanderingfido 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      And then TuSimple can't yet go live with their self- driving trucks. But what might've worked? More trains.

  • @Jhawk_2k
    @Jhawk_2k 2 ปีที่แล้ว +65

    The ending of the video explained: We need to invent trains

    • @taylor3950
      @taylor3950 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Well put! I really do hope that we can invest in rail infrastructure again. It makes so much more sense than long haul trucking

    • @JewTube001
      @JewTube001 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      it was even worse than it, she suggested the hyperloop....

  • @colinmartin9797
    @colinmartin9797 2 ปีที่แล้ว +81

    Lost me at the "we need Hyperloop"
    No. That pipe dream will never materialize for that purpose. We need practical solutions to things like.... The huge list of issues we have that other countries have solved.

    • @cainiaowu
      @cainiaowu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      An fully automated port like Shanghai Yangshan which use robot to load/unload is the solution.
      43.35 million annual TEU at Yangshan vs 8 million TEU at Long Beach.

    • @Floedekage
      @Floedekage 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The US needs to learn how to use railways first before they can have hyperloop!

    • @rncmv
      @rncmv 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      "something like hyperloop" is not the same as "hyperloop"

  • @jw7518
    @jw7518 2 ปีที่แล้ว +96

    The lady was right about the inefficient Ports in the US, but wrong about the most efficient Ports. 7 of the Top 10 in China, including 4 of the top 5 in China, #2 Singapore, #6 Korea, #10 Netherlands.

    • @emitting
      @emitting 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Very true.
      Also the number 1 to 5 % of containers fell off into the sea is wrong. Insurance cost for shipment is 1 % of cost of shipment. I don't think insurance company will charge 1% if the lady quoted number 1-5% is correct.

    • @Obsidian-Nebula
      @Obsidian-Nebula 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I guess You're missing the point a bit

    • @id204ghost7
      @id204ghost7 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Your sorting it based on volumes, not efficiency, though according to maritime-executive, not that anything would change, Asia dominates the top 50 efficient port, with Yokohama(Japan) at the top, and the rest you can prolly guess.

    • @jw7518
      @jw7518 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@id204ghost7 so how do you calculate your efficiency rate?

  • @timnor4803
    @timnor4803 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    She seemed informed and intelligent until she mentioned hyperloop😂😂😂

  • @ALWH1314
    @ALWH1314 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    This Shanghai container port is fully automated with no human crane and movers, so the port can operate almost five times faster than LA port and much safer for human who operate remotely in office via 5G. Don’t think LA port union will like this automation.

    • @coldee785
      @coldee785 ปีที่แล้ว

      And neither should you lol

  • @smilodnfatalis55
    @smilodnfatalis55 2 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    Literally we cannot organize moving boxes around. This is embarrassing.

  • @charlesspesock5069
    @charlesspesock5069 2 ปีที่แล้ว +167

    Sounds like America needs to invest in the ports. It doesn't help that they are owned by the cities they are in. This needs to be a federal thing.

    • @GreasyFox
      @GreasyFox 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      America's infrastructures have been crumbling down for the past few decades. Time to step up the game.

    • @Sinaeb
      @Sinaeb 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      b-b-b-b-but that's not infrastructure!

    • @Sinaeb
      @Sinaeb 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@ralphlaguna6168 with what labour?

    • @Richard_H
      @Richard_H 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@ralphlaguna6168 that's completely un realistic no one wants to buy a 200 dollar toaster every wants a 20 dollar one, the cost of manufacturing in the usa is really high.

    • @michaelcombrink8165
      @michaelcombrink8165 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why aren't there competitors? It may be that too much regulation and politicking is the problem
      The post office is federal
      Amazon is private

  • @DanSolowastaken
    @DanSolowastaken 2 ปีที่แล้ว +97

    It is important to voice that the lack of efficiency is where they make money. If they were as automated, upscaled, and logistically integrated as modern ports then everyone making money would lose it. They make money on service fees and premiums during congested times like these. The shipping monopolies are all deliberately not investing billions of dollars to upgrade things to the new standard. If they did then the profits of "economic rents" to their networks would plummet. Lots of traffic means lots of money for toll booths. More toll booths mean more traffic. Why would they invest in infrastructure that would reduce their "tollbooths"?

    • @cainiaowu
      @cainiaowu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      That is why China is beating American in this field, a strong central government with determination.

    • @willsjaime
      @willsjaime 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      There it is. The problem is fixable When it's not fixed, follow the money or the regulations.

    • @vp4822
      @vp4822 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      And they say that government is inefficient :D

    • @tropics8407
      @tropics8407 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      And who owns the tollbooths (ports) ?
      Who is benefiting ?
      Who stands to lose if this is fixed ?

    • @jw7518
      @jw7518 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Then I guess I shouldn't be surprised why 7 of the Top 10 in China, including 4 of the top 5 in China, #2 Singapore, #6 Korea, #10 Netherlands..

  • @adamhartmann4714
    @adamhartmann4714 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    The thumbnail is Japan to Mexico not China to Chicago.

  • @rebecagmz824
    @rebecagmz824 2 ปีที่แล้ว +54

    I can see why Amazon is trying to come up with their own strategies. Wouldn’t be surprised if they take over.

    • @khein2204
      @khein2204 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      what strategy? they would build their own port?

    • @rebecagmz824
      @rebecagmz824 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@khein2204 Amazon is chartering their own cargo ships, making their own containers and leasing planes to expedite goods. But get this, they are chartering their own vessels to less congested ports such as Houston and New Jersey. I’m pretty sure I read somewhere where Walmart is asking for their assistance as well.

    • @khein2204
      @khein2204 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rebecagmz824 that's a smart move, but I wonder why they didn't build their own port considering amazon is a giant corporation

  • @patriciaschuster1371
    @patriciaschuster1371 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Thanks for explaining about supply chain and shipping information.

  • @TheContainerGuyTV
    @TheContainerGuyTV 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    We're following a 20' container full of shoes. "There's our container!" As they circle a 40' on a vessel. Whoever edited this knows nothing about containers..

  • @Maro_MaroBCH
    @Maro_MaroBCH 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Are upgrading ports included in the infrastructure bill?

    • @tonyburzio4107
      @tonyburzio4107 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No actual construction will take place in California, the money is going to bail out the union pension plans.

    • @htopherollem649
      @htopherollem649 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      5 billion is earmarked for port upgrades in the infrastructure bill

  • @MarksmanSpecialist
    @MarksmanSpecialist 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    just playing as Travis in GTA5 on the shipping container mission is enough to tell me manual loading crates is very inefficient.

    • @Grimwood_
      @Grimwood_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      whos travis

  • @femanvate
    @femanvate 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    A rich investor, a politician, and a Railroad owner walk into a bar.
    They agree to build a new automated port and then LA ports will realize this is not a joke.

  • @Commander_HW
    @Commander_HW 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I remember i saw it on the news a few times about China's ports. It's about how they are using AI to manage those ports and making them fully autonomous. Why can't we use AI?

  • @KAIJUKING123
    @KAIJUKING123 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    So basically this is the day in the life of a shipping container

  • @bhavyagupta321
    @bhavyagupta321 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Everyone is first until they refresh

  • @JohnLaudun
    @JohnLaudun 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I'm pretty sure that's a 40 foot container, not a 20 foot one, that you're tracking. Also, aren't those folks at 6:55 unloading air shipping containers? Your essential point is a good one, but it's undermined by a fact check here and the wrong stock footage there.

  • @lysawoolley9008
    @lysawoolley9008 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    This was very interesting and informative. Thank you 😊

  • @alessandrobergamo6425
    @alessandrobergamo6425 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    You lost me at Hyperloop

    • @500features
      @500features 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      This whole video is sponsored by a future federal alphabet agency waiting to be created. Hyperloop lol.

  • @chinainformation
    @chinainformation 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    01:34 that's a 40feet container not a 20 :)

  • @rickcarrarini5696
    @rickcarrarini5696 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Man this was good. Real eye opener.

  • @rban123
    @rban123 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    a container provides a convenient way of ~containing~ lots of things to make them easier to move them around.

  • @imicca
    @imicca 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    3:02 slight correction & fun fact: ships, like any other vehicles, are feminine, so these are big girls !

    • @RaymondHng
      @RaymondHng 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      In Spanish, _ship_ is _el barco_ and that's masculine. Same with French, _le bateau_ . Same with Portuguese, _o navio_ . And Catalan, _el vaixell_ .
      But in Italian, it's feminine _la nave_ .

    • @imicca
      @imicca 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RaymondHng in English it is feminine :)

    • @RaymondHng
      @RaymondHng 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@imicca Grammatically, Modern English does not have noun gender or gender agreement. English does not change the determiner or adjective to agree with the noun like the Romance languages above do. The narration is using _big boys_ mainly because the two words are alliterative. Calling them _big girls_ loses the alliteration.
      Furthermore, the following Navy oilers are named after men.
      John Lewis T-AO-205 Christened July 17, 2021
      Harvey Milk T-AO-206 Christened November 6, 2021
      Earl Warren T-AO-207 Under construction
      Robert F. Kennedy T-AO-208 Under construction

  • @ApexierGS
    @ApexierGS 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Lol "we need to use something like Hyper Loop to transport the containers inland" are you stark raving mad woman?!! The hyper loop is expensive non efficient transport solution! We have something called freight trains and rail infrastructure that easily built at half the cost and 10x more efficient at transporting containers to an inland hub very quickly arrange schedule setup but no one seems to see port-to-rail directly as a solution to alleviate the congestion by federal government authority to coordinate such logistics by executive order. Sad we just let the logistics companies fumble and wait for them to figure out coordinations amongst themselves.

  • @m3r3dith
    @m3r3dith 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    2:15 Amsterdam...? Shouldn't this be Rotterdam? 🥲🤔

  • @aname8240
    @aname8240 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "something like hyperloop" is an unnecessarily complicated way to say "train"

  • @jdm1039
    @jdm1039 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Make more of our stuff in the USA like we used to and this problem is significantly reduced if not solved. The added bonus is there would be many more jobs in this country like there used to be.

  • @flyingbee10
    @flyingbee10 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can anyone explain what is a hyperloop?

  • @Cgllogistics365
    @Cgllogistics365 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fascinating video! As the founder of a logistics company, I understand the challenges well. Kudos to Lora Cecere for the insightful analysis.

  • @kevindbest2
    @kevindbest2 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wait they send back empty containers back to Asia? Can anyone explain why it's not filled on their way back

  • @ShaudaySmith
    @ShaudaySmith 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    developing a hyperloop for logistics makes a lot more sense than one for commuters between LA and SF.

    • @Varibeca
      @Varibeca 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Or maybe plain trains

    • @ANTSEMUT1
      @ANTSEMUT1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Lol no, hyperloop capacity is hilariously low and maintenance will be a huge pain.

  • @RustyB5000
    @RustyB5000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    they should put big QR codes on them. Or sell ad space

    • @tonyburzio4107
      @tonyburzio4107 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      We do use codes on the containers, the unions forced doing it on paper to keep clerical jobs.

  • @mattcollins4550
    @mattcollins4550 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Forgot to mention (on purpose) that unions in America resist automation and increases in efficiency in the ports.

  • @appry78
    @appry78 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Isn’t the Alameda corridor already the chassis free solution she is referencing?

  • @JAKempelly
    @JAKempelly 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You had me right up to "Hyperloop"

  • @Mansaber
    @Mansaber 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Port of Amsterdam? Don’t you mean the port of Rotterdam

  • @omegaman4153
    @omegaman4153 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    At the 6:50 second mark, what does that have to do with ocean containers?

  • @user-ih7gc7dt9l
    @user-ih7gc7dt9l 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What are chassis? I didn’t hear an explanation.

  • @downtourth
    @downtourth 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I should start a shipping company bringing all the empties back to China for a fair fee, I’d be a shipping magnet

    • @elsonsti
      @elsonsti 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      shipping companies are prettt much monoplization now. they make fortunes these two years.

  • @onyxpartitian
    @onyxpartitian 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Be interested to see the difference between Canadian ports and the American ports. Port of Prince Rupert puts containers on trains fairly quickly and it takes 4 to 6 days to get to Chicago by rail.

    • @mihovillmisha9885
      @mihovillmisha9885 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I was in PR driveing to AK in 1985. What a gloomy town. Probably you are bit more efficient is that minority that is Chi Coms run the port and no drunk Englishmen

  • @emitting
    @emitting 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The number 1 to 5 % of containers fell off into the sea is wrong. Insurance cost for shipment is 1 % of cost of goods. I don't think insurance company will charge 1% if the lady quoted number 1-5% is correct.

  • @busiestytnerd5175
    @busiestytnerd5175 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The autonomous iChassis by Cenntro is gonna be a major help

  • @indrajittt
    @indrajittt 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you Container

  • @daniellovestodance
    @daniellovestodance 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The volume fluctuating between speakers is so painful ..

  • @MingRose
    @MingRose 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    editor, please normalize the voiceover volume. Frequently changing volume is distracting.

  • @sharonhill2602
    @sharonhill2602 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Sounds like someone needs to sort these issues out. They seem simple issues. But why aren’t they being looked at! Especially the container identification.

    • @tonyburzio4107
      @tonyburzio4107 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Oh, it's been looked at. The Unions forced paper so they can keep their army of clerks employed, entering numbers on paper. Yes, on paper, backed up by strikes.

    • @Eselfar
      @Eselfar 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@tonyburzio4107 Seems unions are a cancer in most of the countries they are implemented in...

  • @stephenmubanga7711
    @stephenmubanga7711 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is a container part of the supply chain or logistics and transport?

  • @FDOTDEMONZ
    @FDOTDEMONZ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    thats soo epic

  • @Ayo22210
    @Ayo22210 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Container on barge is coming on the Mississippi

  • @allanj917
    @allanj917 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very very important information for people to understand how sophisticated & complex is the export import industry.....I always pay air freight cause if it arrives through LA....it will take another month or so...

  • @whatever_12
    @whatever_12 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Isn't the container rented and have to be return on a date or else you pay huge fine in usa? In china and africa it's mostly like this. And i see the container being open and transfer in enclosed trailer, for long distance it make sence but for short travel why not take the container directly to the depot. It's common practice here even for long travel, they divide if it is lcl mostly

  • @rolandmdill
    @rolandmdill 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    So instead of better organizing the shipping industry and getting it up the the standards the rest of the world already has implemented, the US should add another unproven mode of transportation like the Hyperloop? If ports and logistic hubs already struggle to get basic tasks automated you would really expect them to adapt that fully automated technology? To me it seems way more likely that asian or european countries will build Hyperloop networks to further improve their shipping industries, it would be the perfect addition for an already almost fully automated system. In the US a Hyperloop network would be congested within a day.

  • @cougarten
    @cougarten 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Whaaat, 1-5% go overboard? that's an insane ratio.

    • @cougarten
      @cougarten 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I looked it up and it was fractions of a percent, much ore likely. When she mentioned hyperloop I really started doubting her anyways....

  • @ronaldcarmona5485
    @ronaldcarmona5485 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Someone please answer this for me:
    If a big ship carries about 7,000 containers (40') does that mean it takes 7,000 semi-trucks to haul away the cargo one container at a time? That's a big job. Thanks for your knowledge.

    • @wanderingfido
      @wanderingfido 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sure is. And I would really hope they're using RFID tech for quicker tracking of assets. But I've been disappointed before.

  • @RaghunandanReddyC
    @RaghunandanReddyC 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    8:30 did she just say Hyperloop?

  • @Thecardiffkook
    @Thecardiffkook 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A way to move containers inland, hmmm where have I heard about this before…

  • @tmmullin
    @tmmullin 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Come on man! You make an explainer video about intermodal containers, and don't know the difference between a 20ft and a 40ft container. In the shot (showing the dimension as 20ft long, "your container" is obviously a 40ft. TEU (twenty foot equivalent units) is the base for measuring traffic volume and ship capacity, but most containers are 40ft.

  • @stev6963
    @stev6963 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very interesting video.

  • @boriscervanti8892
    @boriscervanti8892 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The clip is composed well, but one thing is not logical! Why the Wenzhou made cargo have to transit to Shanghai for export? IN between there is a seaport Ningbo where have shipping route to US as well! And it is not mentioned most container carriers will go Ningbo port for loading before arrival Shanghai?

  • @stuffedgrubs
    @stuffedgrubs 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Use the trailers just do everything at night when traffic is at a minimum and you can just keep on Rollin'

  • @JamSW91
    @JamSW91 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Something like a Hyperloop?? Or just a train maybe…?

  • @biltztom2685
    @biltztom2685 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    How Amazon is so fast and efficient?

  • @MrRoque-pg3yr
    @MrRoque-pg3yr 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Trucks really need their own dedicated highway.

  • @jesserai
    @jesserai 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The short: North American rail needs big infrastructure upgrades

  • @daveburr5650
    @daveburr5650 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The start of the video shows a bunch of *empty* container ships "waiting to unload at the dock".

  • @Piexus_
    @Piexus_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks Ms. Lora

  • @zarfmouse
    @zarfmouse 2 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    This video had me until the very end where she mentioned "Hyperloop". Lost all credibility there. Who in their right mind thinks that hyperloop would somehow solve this problem?
    Trains: they already exist. They are cheaper. They are more efficient. They are more flexible. They aren't the vaporware suggestion of a serial grifter. Real Trains >> Fantasy Hyperloop.

    • @woodalexander
      @woodalexander 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Yup. They ignore trains going to Chicago even though that's how virtually all containers get to Chicago, then they come up with "Hyperloop". It sounds like we need more trains and more chassis and operate the backhaul of empties or filling them with goods to be exported more efficiently.

    • @fallwitch
      @fallwitch 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      And this attitude is why the US is lagging behind (and will never catch up with) Asia and Europe now. People afraid and/or intimidated by new technology.
      That said it won't ever happen in the US any because it would require US companies spending money to upgrade to new technology and American companies no longer view business in the long-term, but only how to maximize short-term profits. Why invest in the future when we can give out management team fat bonuses every year? Who cares about customers or workers? Just give us that bonus!

    • @michaelrmurphy2734
      @michaelrmurphy2734 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Leon Musk...the Donald Trump of the "tech" sector.

    • @yiminyu7131
      @yiminyu7131 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      do you watch adam something's videos?

    • @zarfmouse
      @zarfmouse 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@yiminyu7131 I do, although I had this hyperloop-is-grifty-nonsense opinion before seeing his videos, that shared opinion is part of why I enjoy his videos now.

  • @UometyDev
    @UometyDev 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    😂 Wenzhou is my hometown, so surprised that my little town is mentioned here

  • @rueberschaer
    @rueberschaer 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Who was in charge of audio balancing in this video?!

  • @MrMcMind
    @MrMcMind 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    the moment she said hyperloop, she made it clear she is no expert at all.
    I bet years ago she tought "why not fly those containers around by plains", propably never figured out why we don't...

    • @AD-mo5sg
      @AD-mo5sg 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      She’s just an anti worker, pro automation shill.

  • @diaanaatd8360
    @diaanaatd8360 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What is shipping container?

  • @AaronHalliday
    @AaronHalliday 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    audio mastering needed

  • @timothygaming6305
    @timothygaming6305 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Time to automate And get rid of those longshoreman. They are over paid anyway.

  • @borg386
    @borg386 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    That is not a 20 ft container!

  • @xijinpig4211
    @xijinpig4211 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I hate to say it but the shelves are not empty the prices are up a little but not bad where I am even during the last week before Christmas

  • @yeanah9158
    @yeanah9158 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is this a re-upload? I feel like I’ve watched this before.

  • @iwouldliketoorderanumber1b79
    @iwouldliketoorderanumber1b79 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    America is always slow on new infrastructure tech, or just new infrastructure period. We spend little money on that.

  • @gregdennis3397
    @gregdennis3397 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Something doesn't add up. 226 million containers shipped annually but only 17 million containers globally. According to google. Yet 90 days to ship 1 container.

  • @tbrankin
    @tbrankin 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    7:40 Lora Cecere correctly identifies the main issue with the current container bottleneck at LA/LB (and many ports around the world): a shortage of truck chassis to evacuate full import containers and return empty (or full) containers for export - A lack of chassis. However, instead of shuttling containers via Hyperloop to distribution centers and container depot, EagleRail is a much more cost effective and practical solution: th-cam.com/video/csYb1J9tqvE/w-d-xo.html

  • @ellamennop
    @ellamennop 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    who owns the actual containers? whole video is fascinating, thank you

    • @Liamyownzu
      @Liamyownzu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      generally shipping lines own the containers

    • @AshrakAhmed
      @AshrakAhmed 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      mostly Shipping company who also owns the ships i.e. Maersk, Evergreen etc.
      Rest are own by container leasing company.

  • @hewhohasnoidentity4377
    @hewhohasnoidentity4377 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The video doesn't actually contain the information the title claims. I guess I'll tell you.
    Container loaded on a ship and departs China
    at sea in transit
    at port in other locations waiting for offload and loading of other containers
    At sea in transit.
    (Currently expect 20 day wait for clearance to enter LA Long Beach ports. You are not in line until you reach queue area. This causes full power in a hurry so they can wait. If they slow to conserve fuel it can cost millions and another week)
    Unload at port.
    Wait 9-11 days
    Get placed on a chassis and taken by truck to a warehouse in the greater LA area.
    Wait indefinitely for empty containers to be removed to make space at the dock to unload.
    Once unloaded the container becomes one of more than 100,000 estimated empty containers clogging up LA and Long Beach.
    For many reasons, mainly California being California, it is cheaper and easier to make another container in China than it is to take it back for reuse.
    Amazon is responding by having them made to easily convert to standard US road trailers. They charter entire ships with their own crane to offload. Next the road trailer is completed and the loaded trailer starts it's 20+ year life of highway use.

  • @davearbogast2882
    @davearbogast2882 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Ignores the fact that California has outlawed independent contractors = most long distance trucker (own and operate their rigs as independent contractors) can't pickup / drop-off containers in that state anymore. Any business having the choice of Ports in Florida know this fact.

    • @tonyburzio4107
      @tonyburzio4107 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      No, they exploit industry to pay off politicians.

  • @tamicawilson2965
    @tamicawilson2965 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks

  • @albizu
    @albizu 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The prediction about empty shelves and the inability to get Christmas presents never materialized.

  • @DavidNunezPNW
    @DavidNunezPNW 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Her solution is a Hyperloop? WTF 😂

  • @user-cw2py6wh8l
    @user-cw2py6wh8l 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    create a new port outside the city.

  • @MayorMcC666
    @MayorMcC666 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    if your solution is hyperloop you are just scrambling to line your pockets instead of actual infrastructural solutions

  • @ksingleton101
    @ksingleton101 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why was the container sent back to China empty?

    • @TheNixie1972
      @TheNixie1972 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Because there is not enough stuff produced in the US that can fill all return trips to China. Therefore to keep a flow of containers available to fill in China (or other Far East country) they have to be sent empty.

    • @flx4305
      @flx4305 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Us export more services than goods, like movies, tv shows, softwares, patents, knowhow, universities fees and so on..

  • @willsjaime
    @willsjaime 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hyperloop? That or just optimize the port.

  • @edward7764
    @edward7764 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    LOL that's not a 20ft container

  • @lmaobox4068
    @lmaobox4068 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    All to bring products that still break within a week

  • @maxd3028
    @maxd3028 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Chinese are very well talented In manufacturing cheap yet ok quality goods...