How to Share Opportunities and Split Commissions in Salesforce

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 31 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 14

  • @marysab7860
    @marysab7860 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi. Thank you for the video. Do you know the way to make opportunity splits to work with ETM?

    • @Rotive
      @Rotive  ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Mary, I don't know about this. I don't think ETM connects with Opportunity Teams, though I'm sure you could use a Flow if needed to fill out the team based on the primary owner.

  • @marrevaldez131
    @marrevaldez131 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is there a way to allow up to an "x" number of splits? For example, I can split the opportunity with up to 3 members?

    • @Rotive
      @Rotive  ปีที่แล้ว

      Absolutely, you can have three members. Just add additional splits in that split edit screen. There is a button in the lower left to add row. I do believe there is a maximum limit, but I'm not 100% sure about that.

    • @marrevaldez131
      @marrevaldez131 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Rotive Thank you! I want to know if I can configure a maximum limit to avoid splitting the opportunity more than 3 times. I'll continue searching. Thanks again!

    • @Rotive
      @Rotive  ปีที่แล้ว

      @@marrevaldez131 I see now. I don't think so, but not sure. Curious to hear what you find out!

    • @marrevaldez131
      @marrevaldez131 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Rotive Hello again! I pulled this off by installing Rollup Helper. Below are the steps:
      1. Install Rollup Helper
      2. Create a custom field on the Opportunity object of type number.
      3. Create a rollup, using Rollup Helper, that will count each split (funny enough, you can't create this rollup using Salesforce) and save the count in the field created in step 2.
      4. Create a validation rule to check the number of splits on the field created in step 2 (if its greater than three trigger, the validation).

  • @swellscs
    @swellscs ปีที่แล้ว

    It looks like someone missed something when setting up Opp Teams; when we add a Team Member, they don't have access to edit the Opportunity (confirmed their access is set to Read/Write). Was there a step missed to override the Read Only Access on their Profile?

    • @Rotive
      @Rotive  ปีที่แล้ว

      Hey Sarah, If the Profile has Read Only access to an object you won't overwrite that with the Opportunity teams setting. There is no way that profile can edit that type of record. You probably want to set their profile to read/write and then change Organization Sharing Rules so they can't edit opportunities they don't own. Permissions are tough because it's controlled in a few places: Organization Wide Sharing, Roles, Profiles, and Permissions.

  • @jessicawatkins5563
    @jessicawatkins5563 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I saw I can enable the splits down to the product level. I cannot for the life of me, find where to add the product level split. Any ideas? Thanks!

    • @jessicawatkins5563
      @jessicawatkins5563 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not sure why it takes just asking the question for the answer to just come to you but if anyone else is looking for this, edit page in the lightning builder and instead of trying to add a related list, it is actually a standard component so on the left, search Opportunity Split and it will come up! Both editing opportunity as well as product splits are there!

    • @Rotive
      @Rotive  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you, Jessica!

  • @Jeremysoccer45
    @Jeremysoccer45 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is best practice in regards to having 2 opportunity owners tagged to a single opportunity? Is it okay to add both on the opportunity team with the same Team Member role of "Opportunity Owner" OR is it best to avoid this by having a validation rule that only allows 1 distinct Team Member role per opportunity?

    • @Rotive
      @Rotive  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hey Jeremy, There will always be one person listed in the opportunity owner fields on the record. You can't have two users in that spot. That's, of course, where opportunity teams comes in to play. I think it's fine to have two "owners" on the team. Just know that one of them will be the technical owner of the record which should matter if you're reporting based on the team.