Cesium Chloride Density Gradient Centrifugation

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 ก.ย. 2024
  • This is the technique used in the Meselson and Stahl experiment, which tested hypotheses about DNA replication. I explain how the cesium chloride density gradient forms, and where DNA goes in the gradient during centrifugation.

ความคิดเห็น • 73

  • @agathman
    @agathman  12 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Note that the key to forming the density gradient is that you need an ion that is so massive that centrifugation partially overcomes the attraction between the ion and water molecules. The attraction to water keeps the ions dispersed evenly; the force of centrifugation pushes the ions down, but that effect is only noticeable IF the ion is really massive. That's why the Cl ions stay evenly distributed. So no, Na won't work -- it's not massive enough.

  • @harshitmangal8568
    @harshitmangal8568 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Thank u so much sir. I was struggling so much with the exact use of CsCl centrifugation in Meselson and Stahl experiment. But after watching your video, it is crystal clear.

  • @mohitgarg2679
    @mohitgarg2679 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    After struggling to understand it after surfing a lot of webpages with no result, I finally understand it here.

  • @serenastudy5745
    @serenastudy5745 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wow, that was so clear. Thank you for such depth and clarity!! Praise God.

  • @Viridian88
    @Viridian88 11 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This is a great explanation.. Many thanks! :) English is not my mother tongue so I do not fully get your explanation, but you explain (and write) in such a way that I get the most of it, anyway.
    There's only one thing I'm not sure about. I know that DNA density should be around 1.66 - 1.69 g/cm^3. If Cs+ maximum density were 1.6, DNA should fall all the way down.
    I thought that Cs density on the bottom were about 1.9 g/cm^3, in order to make the DNA lay "suspended" in the middle of the vial.

  • @myranasser8815
    @myranasser8815 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    i've looked up so many explanations and this is the only one that made me understand it thank you 👍

  • @yaangreece
    @yaangreece 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very nice and accurate explanation. Greetings from Greece!

  • @panktishah2375
    @panktishah2375 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    i audibly laughed in an empty room when you said duck, thank you for that

  • @agathman
    @agathman  11 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I've added a note on the video making this correction at the appropriate point. Good catch, thanks.

  • @asheemitabagchi2063
    @asheemitabagchi2063 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Such a beautiful explanation !!! Thank you so much!

    • @biologylover1565
      @biologylover1565 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I am happy to see you just promoting odia culture.

    • @monikaluthra339
      @monikaluthra339 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hey Asheemita, is it your page. Monika from IIT DELHI

  • @TheMountblanc
    @TheMountblanc 11 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    by the way, there is a serious small error in this video: Mr. Gathman claims that only the Cs+ will move down the tube but Cl- will stay equally distributed in the solution. This cannot be right, as this would mean a charge separation. Coulomb forces are very strong, much stronger than the small gravity differences due to the density gradient in solution. Therefore also the Cl- has to follow the Cs+ in order to keep the charge equilibrium in solution.

    • @Trypanosoma_
      @Trypanosoma_ 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      TheMountblanc I think you’re not taking into account the fact that the charges of both cesium and chloride ions are neutralized by the water molecules surrounding them, so there would be no potential difference between them

  • @damianomigani
    @damianomigani 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very informative Sir! thank you. Also i laughed when you said ' think about what floats: 'a duck' (7.57). Clear and relatable example.

  • @55shrey
    @55shrey ปีที่แล้ว

    Such a wonderful explanation, Respect.

  • @vedansfanclub-vfc
    @vedansfanclub-vfc 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    One of the best Explanation!

  • @amizan23
    @amizan23 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    you should upload more videos like this really helpful
    thank you..............

  • @ashwanichauhan6353
    @ashwanichauhan6353 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you sir your explaination is really conceptual

  • @cheeko6166
    @cheeko6166 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    awesome explanation thank you so much , hope you're safe and healthy

    • @agathman
      @agathman  3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Glad you found it useful. I'm happily retired for 4 years now, and I and my family are all healthy (and vaccinated)!

  • @sohamsarkar5492
    @sohamsarkar5492 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank You, Sir Allen! It's a massive help for me 🙏

  • @MaverickCF
    @MaverickCF ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you very much! very good explanation

  • @joenyc
    @joenyc 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    wow, he is very clear and knowledgeable about his explanations!!!! awesome!

  • @monikaluthra339
    @monikaluthra339 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Really, well explained sir. I am actually going through Plasmid Purification, so there we use EtBr CsCl density gradient centrifugATION, I got to know real concept of how CsCl creates density. Thanks, @Allen Gathman

  • @agathman
    @agathman  13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @lmarcze11 -- In the gradients that Meselson and Stahl ran, there would have been little protein there in the first place, as they were purifying the DNA before putting it in the gradient. Proteins should do the same thing that DNA or any other molecule does in the gradient, though. They would move to the place in the gradient where their density equals the density of the solution.

  • @rubaithasan8911
    @rubaithasan8911 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent video

  • @jamesstewart5005
    @jamesstewart5005 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This video turned me into a newt.

  • @nerds1841
    @nerds1841 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thankyou 😊😊

  • @films_films_films
    @films_films_films 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    your answer is so good and convincing ... Once again thanks a lot :)

  • @majidghorbanibirgani3355
    @majidghorbanibirgani3355 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you sir
    God bless you

  • @agathman
    @agathman  11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hmm.. Good point. I bet you're right about that.

  • @agathman
    @agathman  13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @Jonway9 - Who are you who are so wise in the ways of science?

  • @anupam15893
    @anupam15893 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    superb best and understandable video thanks alot.........

  • @alhilfisufyan6778
    @alhilfisufyan6778 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you i hope u still well

    • @agathman
      @agathman  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm fine, thanks, although somewhat grayer. I've been retired for two years now, and am loving it.

  • @Jonway9
    @Jonway9 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @agathman Oh I wasn't implying the explanation was flawed in any way. I was merely referencing Monty Python because your "even small rocks" comment reminded me of the duck scene.

  • @4oureveryoung
    @4oureveryoung 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    THAT WAS GREAT!! than you for the clear explanation!

  • @nemodot
    @nemodot 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great explanation!

  • @mhdhabiba5509
    @mhdhabiba5509 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much you saved me

  • @films_films_films
    @films_films_films 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thnks a lot fr this video .... I've got some doubts.... instead of CsCl if u proceed the centrifugation wit any salt like NaCl ..wil there b any gradient formation? if so y cant we proceed wit it? can anybody help me?

    • @mrinaliniroy6221
      @mrinaliniroy6221 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Because Na ions are smaller than Cs ions..they won't form a gradient..we needed something larger .. that's why

  • @CynthiaRWebb
    @CynthiaRWebb 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi, great video! could you tell me if CsCl could be replaced with anything else that is perhaps cheaper? Thank you.

  • @Viridian88
    @Viridian88 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Another (silly) question: we know that we may use NaCl to shield phosphate negative charges in order to make ss-DNAs re-annealing easier.
    According to a purely theoretical point of view, shouldn't CsCl mime the same "salting" effect as NaCl?
    I guess that while helping reannealing, we do not use centrifuge: yet, Cs+ should be way heavier than Na+ and tend to precipitate much more easily.
    Is it right?

  • @agathman
    @agathman  13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @Jonway9 I know -- you didn't notice my response was also a quote?

  • @mohammadrmit
    @mohammadrmit 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Clear explanation, keep it up

  • @Jonway9
    @Jonway9 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So, if she weighs the same as a duck, then she's made of wood. And therefore... A WITCH!

  • @Jonway9
    @Jonway9 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    haha lol I missed that. You are too subtle for me :) I need to have a Monty Python marathon.

  • @user-cb6eq3hc1s
    @user-cb6eq3hc1s 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks a Trillion

  • @bwnrehal9114
    @bwnrehal9114 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanku it is very helpful

  • @beningham9782
    @beningham9782 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video thankyou!

  • @abdulazeem1928
    @abdulazeem1928 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video :)

  • @WorldCollections
    @WorldCollections 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent!

  • @WonderSky32
    @WonderSky32 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    awesome, Thank you so much!!

  • @hyderali692
    @hyderali692 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I still can't understand what is the use of chloride here when the experiment depends on the concentration gradient of only cesium?

    • @agathman
      @agathman  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      If you were to put pure metallic cesium in the water, you'd have a violent reaction! What you need is cesium ions in solution. You can't have the cesium ions without another, negative ion for them to form a salt with, so CsCl is the handiest. I suppose it could be done with some other ionic cesium compound, but CsCl is readily available.

    • @hyderali692
      @hyderali692 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Oh. Thank You Allen.

  • @pavanieemani5084
    @pavanieemani5084 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir I didn't understand why cs ions will not form pellet at the end of the tube...?

    • @hammeredgrannies7821
      @hammeredgrannies7821 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      They’re positively charged and repel each other, and they are attracted to polar water molecules that keep them suspended.

    • @pavanieemani5084
      @pavanieemani5084 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@hammeredgrannies7821 thank you..!!!

  • @rohitverma2649
    @rohitverma2649 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    nice video thanks Sir!!

  • @beautiful30006522
    @beautiful30006522 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    fantastic vid

  • @user-ki4tz6wo9j
    @user-ki4tz6wo9j 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you. It's nice :)

  • @oa8255
    @oa8255 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    that was awesome

  • @alyaamohamed3990
    @alyaamohamed3990 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you sir

  • @nleontis
    @nleontis 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This is absolutely wrong. The centrifuge cannot separate the Cs+ and Cl- ions from each other! That would violate charge balance. It is true that the gradient forms but it is a gradient of Cs+ AND Cl- ions.

    • @acharjeeanwesha
      @acharjeeanwesha 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Neocles Leontis
      CsCl dissociates in any polar solvent. what made you think that the centrifuge would do that.

    • @mrinaliniroy6221
      @mrinaliniroy6221 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hey bro,centtifuge didn't separate them..they just dissociated in water as the Cs & Cl together made CsCl by ionic interactions, just like NaCl(bt sodium ion is much smaller than Cs), so they simply separated in their constituent ions in a polar solvent..hope could help you understand better Neocles

  • @SwethaShri-w4s
    @SwethaShri-w4s 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    But ducks don't float....they swim😂

  • @AnilkumarGulia
    @AnilkumarGulia 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    ur voice is not much clear