2023 Mercedes EQB 350 4MATIC 70mph Highway Range Test

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 107

  • @RNtechie
    @RNtechie 2 ปีที่แล้ว +48

    I traded in my model 3 for an EQB 300 for better ride comfort and better build quality. I love it.

    • @GreyWolfAuto
      @GreyWolfAuto 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      I ordered Tesla Model 3 performance, and then i meet guy with EQB 300, then i go to Mercedes dealership for a test drive... i canceled Tesla order and order EQB ...

    • @Idiotsincarshere
      @Idiotsincarshere ปีที่แล้ว

      @@GreyWolfAuto how long did it take to get your EQB? How's your experience been? Any issues? Thanks

    • @GreyWolfAuto
      @GreyWolfAuto ปีที่แล้ว

      Actually I bought w206 220d 😂 because electric cars is not for me … but now I have aEQB as a second car and everything is good… but the real range on EQB300 is maximum 300km, when you go 160km/h then it’s only 170-180km range… now I got 10k km with no problem.

    • @liamlee0811
      @liamlee0811 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I have an EQB 250 for a month, and I ordered third-party adaptive cruz control. I can't wait! Love EQB!!!

  • @GregoryVeizades
    @GregoryVeizades 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    My dads GLK 250 has 235mm wide tires as well. They aren't thin. Thats perfectly fine for that size of vehicle.

  • @therandomvlogs
    @therandomvlogs 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    My wife just got an EQB 300. Thankfully at MSRP. Unfortunately ours doesn’t have auto seats. They just credited us for it. It was a fair trade off to find this at the price point and without having to wait. She loves it.

    • @Ryn2890
      @Ryn2890 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      “Thankfully at MSRP” 😂😂😂😂
      Things arnt worth paying over 35k for

  • @mikedrew394
    @mikedrew394 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Great job Jordan. Very interesting that someone would purchase a bare bones EQB without adaptive cruise control or lane centering etc. Instead of a loaded ionic five, EV6 etc haha

  • @roadtripusa9433
    @roadtripusa9433 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    We just got our 2024 EQB four days ago. First thing we did a day later was going on a 400km (~250 miles) roundtrip.
    Car drives nice. It’s fully equipped with a list price just shy of €80k. That is absolutely crazy. Thank god it’s a company car. Our previous hybrid GLC with the same equipment had a €76k price tag in 2020. Make of that all you want.
    The premium stereo is fantastic. It tales you through an entire sound profile set up (if you dare) during which it lets you set up the sound behavior of your stereo way beyond more / less bass.
    Overall it drives nice. Top speed is only 163 kph (just over 100 mph), which is a bit slow for German roads. Rest of world would care, I guess. When living in the U.S. we almost never crossed 90 mph anyways. It pulls nicely all to the limiter.
    But driving that fast will limit ones range. We got an realistic 240-250km (150-155mls) out of the battery. But that’s at all out German-highway-speed, which really means lots of hard breaking and hard acceleration. 😂
    Charging speed at 100kw/h is rather suspect, but well…
    Our son loves the car, as it’s so quiet. Ride is comfortable with the premium setup.
    Mercedes app works well. However, if you’ve ever owned / drove a Tesla you’d miss the full on phone-as-a-key feature. It always needs you to have the key on you, which a Tesla does not require.
    One thing that’s annoying to me: no real one-pedal-driving. It does well up to about 5 mph, after which it just keeps creeping along. That could be better. Takes away from the experience when driving in city traffic. (I know, I am lazy).
    MBUX in the 2024 is way more modern than in this video.
    That’s about it.

  • @kens97sto171
    @kens97sto171 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Nice .. love the videos.
    little crazy to me that a $60 Mercedes, has less standard basic safety equipment like radar cruise, lane departure etc.. than a base model Toyota Corolla.

    • @johnwallace2384
      @johnwallace2384 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I am very surprised on reading the comments regarding how poor the specs are on this EQB 350 . Here in the UK it is fully specced & the only add on one gets when configuring the 350 is Driving Assistance Package & the rest of the well specced vehicle are all standard. I have a pdf file of my configuration which shows all the kit available in this vehicle if anyone wants to see it.

    • @kens97sto171
      @kens97sto171 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@johnwallace2384
      Seems to me the safety equipment should be standard on a car that expensive. That's the only thing that really bugged me. How ridiculous that a base model Toyota Corolla has more standard driver assistance.

    • @johnwallace2384
      @johnwallace2384 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@kens97sto171 I most definitely agree.

    • @TeddyBearGaming999
      @TeddyBearGaming999 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That’s the way the Germans do it. Everything is an optional extra

  • @techups3082
    @techups3082 2 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    No More 7500 credit. Underwhelmed by the range test. I cancelled my booked order

    • @H.avery355
      @H.avery355 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      When did it stop qualify for tax credit

    • @techups3082
      @techups3082 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@H.avery355 Aug 16. Any EV manufactured outside North America does not Qualify. Unless they amend the law again... but as of today it does not qualify

  • @hendriknoack6057
    @hendriknoack6057 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Hey Jordan, did you do the Mercedes Me setup with MBUX? Without that it won't enable the EQ functionality that is included. You definitely need the account to be setup first, or the navigation will just be the same as with a regular combustion car.
    Otherwise no surprises for a shared platform car from Mercedes.

  • @justsahar1253
    @justsahar1253 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Are you guys going to do a highway range test for the EQS SUV?

  • @marlonb2804
    @marlonb2804 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I have the EQB 300 and purchase it over the model Y because it ride, built quality and the luxury interior.
    Very sporty ride, smooth and planted ride.
    The only car that i like over it is the IX BMW, amazing ride and Handling.
    The IX is my next EV!!!

  • @brightymcbrightface
    @brightymcbrightface 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    "I didn't wreck it this time!" … deserves a thumbs up.

  • @DadMichoMurphy
    @DadMichoMurphy 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    As a used car, these are going for high 30s. What do you think of the value of a sub 5k miles nearly-new version at that price?

  • @peterjorgensen3
    @peterjorgensen3 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Hey Out Of Spec - Do you have all your range results in a spreadsheet somewhere? Like what Bjorn Nyland has?

  • @Crazypostman
    @Crazypostman 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    You say it's a box but it went quite a bit further with better wh/mi Mach-E 70 mile range test.

  • @mikebroom1866
    @mikebroom1866 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Brand name is the only reason to buy this. It's spec'd like a car from 3-4 years ago.

  • @Trades46
    @Trades46 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Was debating between this EQB 350 4matic and the Audi Q4 50 e-tron quattro. At the end the Audi was significantly less expensive, has more range and felt like a better EV due to its purpose built MEB architecture. The Mercedes wins in interior quality and material use, but in Canada where a loaded EQB 350 is close to $91k CAD while the Q4 e-tron clocks in at $78k, this is a no brainer.

  • @blackeyeliner86
    @blackeyeliner86 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Completely agree, how is keyless entry not standard?!! I finally found my EQB and made sure it had Keyless entry. It’s included in the Exclusive Trim level

  • @airplanenut6242
    @airplanenut6242 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Just coming back to this video to say this range test doesn’t appear on the out of spec website. Not sure why.

  • @christiansta2771
    @christiansta2771 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Went with the EQB350 because I got it for MSRP and did not have to pay a crazy markup, this was 5-6 months ago. The other options were far more expensive with the markups.

    • @issacabraham1505
      @issacabraham1505 ปีที่แล้ว

      And now people are getting 15% off MSRP plus incentives in them..

    • @christiansta2771
      @christiansta2771 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@issacabraham1505 yup. Changes in the economy will do that. It is what it is. I am ok with it, just glad I didn't pay over MSRP.

  • @cjonesplay1
    @cjonesplay1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Good Video Jordan

  • @ctk4949
    @ctk4949 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    XC40/C40 has the same range as this, but has 130 more HP and is cheaper!! LOL!!

    • @johnj2803
      @johnj2803 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Aren't the Volvos smaller than this?

    • @ctk4949
      @ctk4949 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@johnj2803 Hmm its about 10" longer, but 2" narrower, and wheelbase is only 5" longer. So meh, rather have the XC40/C40.

    • @petrkubena
      @petrkubena 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      But it's not really drivable under 10% especially in winter (look up Bjorn's test). Plus some (like me) have problems with chinese owned companies.
      As for you dimensions "meh" - Hyundai Kona is "only" 9" shorter than XC40, is that also "meh"?

    • @ctk4949
      @ctk4949 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@petrkubena Meh, I'm rarely under 10% or that cold in South FL, lol. Meh, Kona EV is more of a sub-compact SUV and $35k, I think the eqb and XC40, would be considered compact SUV.

    • @hajosapper2640
      @hajosapper2640 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ctk4949 the EQB is as long as a Volvo XC60, Audi Q5, BMW X3! That is compact??? Unbelievable, for us in Germany it is mid-class!😊

  • @febrianadji5758
    @febrianadji5758 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    GLB are also came with 1.3L engine
    235mm wide tires seems reasonable if not too wide for 1.3L
    But idk with EQB

  • @Jim-hr1ky
    @Jim-hr1ky 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Myrtle the Mercedes turtle.

  • @AUNTLISEY
    @AUNTLISEY 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I would get the EQB over the Y because of the more luxurious interior and the smooth ride. However the Y excels in performance and driving range so it's a toss up. Just wish the interior of the Y didn't look so darn ugly.

  • @Yormsane
    @Yormsane ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'd go for the base EQB 250 (FWD), and add ventilated seats and the Burmester sound system. But I'd definitely cross-shop it with a Kia EV6 Wind (RWD) edition, which has more quoted range, faster charging potential, better standard equipment, and a lower price.

  • @CMCNestT
    @CMCNestT 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    If the EQE SUV does start under $80k to qualify for Federal Tax Credits then this Hungarian made EQB doesn't make sense. Except for maybe an absolute base spec.

  • @alen32896
    @alen32896 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Would like to see better tech for the price. At least as an option would be nice.

  • @mikedrew394
    @mikedrew394 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hey I have an idea for an additional channel: Out of Spec Craft Beer Reviews. What do you say? Haha

  • @jciii5589
    @jciii5589 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Traded my 2009 gl 550 and w/ the tax incentive price was $31k. Love the ride!

  • @SiuLeung
    @SiuLeung 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Pretty much all the credits are gone for all EVs. The battery source requirements screwed all EVs

  • @coffeewithdawood
    @coffeewithdawood 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I own one and had been at the shop over 30 days, huge issue with charging.....Mercedess blames eletrify and eledtrify blames Mercedess........DO NOT BUY EQB.....However I have EQS and no charging issue

  • @DamianW-p7g
    @DamianW-p7g 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Did you ever do the charging test?

  • @amcdonal86VT
    @amcdonal86VT ปีที่แล้ว

    You said the wind was 3mph but then said that the wind picked up at the end. I wonder if there was a headwind for part of the drive?

  • @andypyatt2783
    @andypyatt2783 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just last weekend I drove the model three on Friday and the EQ be on Sunday. I also chose the EQ be over the model way. To me, it felt more luxurious, and the dry felt better. True, it did not have as much power, but it felt as if it was better made. Also, I already have a model three and the Y felt like a tall version of the model three. I also think the, Mercedes has more trunk space than the Y does although I could be wrong. Lastly, I live in Florida and the Mercedes had ventilated seats. Hard to pass that up.😂😂

    • @andypyatt2783
      @andypyatt2783 ปีที่แล้ว

      One other thing, had MSRP of $61 with options, but purchased for $59 soooo not as pricey as stated in the video

  • @davidgarrison8012
    @davidgarrison8012 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    No tow rating nor hitch option for a hitch mounted bike rack is a huge disappointment.

  • @HPF-Jensen
    @HPF-Jensen 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    i would buy it because it looks like a car and drives like a car😊

  • @Marker-er3ro
    @Marker-er3ro 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    We won’t be buying one. Dealers are asking $7500 over sticker with no tax break for a poorly spec’d car. It drives well, but is a poor value.

  • @xristosvasiliou3408
    @xristosvasiliou3408 ปีที่แล้ว

    What do the numbers 250
    250+
    300
    And 350 stand for?

  • @claudium1441
    @claudium1441 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Unless you’re getting a huge discount, it doesn’t make sense.

  • @carsafetytechnology1663
    @carsafetytechnology1663 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    for someone who needs 7 seater EV. Not so many alternatives (Model Y and EQB only? for relatively reasonable price. Model X much more expensive), otherwise 3 models from Hyundai corporations, especially GV60 leaves EQB in a dust.

  • @GlassActivist
    @GlassActivist 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    EPA mileage standard should be adopted in Europe, too. WLTP is a joke.

  • @mspeed2441
    @mspeed2441 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great test. $75,000 for 211 miles???!!! I guess it's 2015. That's ridiculous.
    What has happened to Mercedes? Unless you spend $150,000, this is what you get.

  • @IlIlIlIlIlIlIlIl-v9h
    @IlIlIlIlIlIlIlIl-v9h ปีที่แล้ว

    Kum & Go? An entire board of adults thought that’d be a good name? 😂😂😂😂 KUM 😂😂😂and go 😂😂😂😂😂

  • @victorvek5227
    @victorvek5227 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This or an e-tron?

  • @scubatrucker6806
    @scubatrucker6806 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Look like a VW Touareg.

  • @commanderroddi7742
    @commanderroddi7742 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    the turtle must be something german... Klauss?

  • @anthonydavis7151
    @anthonydavis7151 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir Edward the turtle 🐢

  • @antonymcneillis
    @antonymcneillis 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Myrtle

  • @techfixr2012
    @techfixr2012 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Yoshi

  • @Huskerj1000
    @Huskerj1000 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Looks like an old grandma car. Almost no tech, slow grandma speed , 0 to 60 in 7 secs😮,yikes. Slow grandma charging. 😢 Mercedes fangirls will probably like this car😂

  • @matthewprather7386
    @matthewprather7386 ปีที่แล้ว

    Rideshare / taxi spec.

  • @tubelator
    @tubelator 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What a boring car. No options on the basic version which is kinda sad.

    • @CHMichael
      @CHMichael 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's why it's basic - they expect you to ad what you like extra. This is just the car to state a lower starting price. "Starting at "

    • @danielstehura9657
      @danielstehura9657 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You would not buy it if it had Options!!!

  • @naarealy
    @naarealy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wouldn't buy it, but Mercedes is hoping you will because it's the cheapest way to get an electric "7-seater".
    Otherwise it's pretty terrible value when compared to the Hyundai/Kia/Génesis or even Tesla.

  • @kevinphillips9408
    @kevinphillips9408 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    That’s a very disappointing range. Thanks for your review.

  • @Ficon
    @Ficon 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Dollar for dollar, Mercedes offers the absolute worst value of the German big three. Super cheaply made base cars with very expensive options. If you don’t need 250+ miles of range (and you don’t), you can get a lightly used e-Tron for the same money.

  • @zoner__
    @zoner__ ปีที่แล้ว

    Needs 270 range

  • @williammillard687
    @williammillard687 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Mertle

  • @MF-et5nk
    @MF-et5nk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Lousy range for the money.

  • @tmwei396
    @tmwei396 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This vehicle is a joke for what they're charging. It's a hard pass for me.

  • @tofislam
    @tofislam ปีที่แล้ว

    Turdle

  • @yzoooon
    @yzoooon 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That color is not my type

  • @edgarplummer6750
    @edgarplummer6750 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Put four passengers and a load of groceries in the trunk then repeat the same drive - give me real world usage test that I can actually use?

    • @updlate4756
      @updlate4756 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Because that's how everyone does range tests, right? lol. FYI, weight doesn't really have an impact on highway range. It does have a small impact on city range during acceleration and breaking, although it should be minor given that EVs regen when coming to a stop.

    • @edgarplummer6750
      @edgarplummer6750 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@updlate4756 Weight don't effect range have you ever driven a car before?

    • @edgarplummer6750
      @edgarplummer6750 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@updlate4756 So according to you we both can drive the same car the same distance even I'm pulling 2 ton of cargo WTF?

    • @updlate4756
      @updlate4756 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@edgarplummer6750 Yes, I have. And yes, I've watched hundreds of EV range tests, and understand how the powertrains work. Do you?

    • @updlate4756
      @updlate4756 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@edgarplummer6750 2 ton of cargo? Yeesh, how much do your passengers and groceries weigh exactly? 2 tons... 4,000 lbs of passengers and groceries. Wowzers.