@RR PLAN C to each their own. I had a 1.6 VTEC Sport EP2 and a 1.8 SE. The handling and performance trumps both. Admittedly, it’s not a Type R but, it does me fine. Still love it.
@@KuroMicra Yeah its an awesome car, I have a 2017 Civic SR in Red and it looks so nice and is a joy to drive. Its amazing how good of a driver's car it really is, and drives very sporty at high revs.
Hi, I just bought the car yesterday at 53000 miles. Is the ticking sound in the engine normal? Also, at what sort of mileage did you change the timing belt? Thanks
Honda finally figured out what Suzuki already knew in 1987! 1987 chevy sprint turbo fuel injected turbo charged 1.0liter. It got 50-60mpg on 87octane. Built by.... SUZUKI
Great review! I actually test drove the same model last week, and to be honest, I wasn't expecting much from a 1l, 3 pot, even with the turbo. However, I was really surprised with how smooth the engine was, and how slick the gearbox was. I wasn't keen on the look either, but once I saw it in person in the showroom, I really changed my mind. I was tempted with the 1.5 sport version, but my local Honda dealer told me there was quite a long wait for that model- 16 weeks. Moreover, in reality, I know that the model I'd test driven would be more than adequate for my needs, so I ordered one in rallye red. I've watched quite a few of your reviews, and always find them extremely well balanced. It's refreshing to see reviews minus the gimmicks, and clarkson-esque humour.
Hi Simon. Wow, thank you for all of that. Agreed, engine and gearbox on the 3-pot are both brilliant. Well done on ordering one! When will it arrive? As for our reviews, you're too kind, thank you. It takes a lot of work to put one together, so it's good to know people are watching and enjoying! SW
Well, I've had the Civic for a couple of weeks now, and I'm quite impressed with it. I love the smooth gearbox, cabin layout, cabin and boot space, and the electric lumbar support. The ride quality is surprisingly good, as is front visibility. The rear visibility was always going to be compromised by the spoiler, but I haven't had any noticeable problems, plus the rear view camera does help to mitigate this when reversing. I'm also impressed with the variable ratio steering, which makes driving around twisty A roads rather fun. Allied to the multi link rear suspension, I feel very reassured when cornering at speed. The turn in is far better than I expected too. I was expecting the infotainment to be disappointing, judging by some of the reviews, but after a good play around, it's not really all that bad. It certainly isn't class leading, but I've found it perfectly acceptable. That 1 litre engine really is a gem, apart from the somewhat throaty rapid rasp I get in 1st gear, once you move up gears, it's pretty refined for such a small engine. I'm still not keen on the rear end styling, but, other than that, I'm really happy with my purchase.
Simon Mellor how you getting on with this now mate? I have the 1.0L turbo SR, I do a mix of dual carriageway and b roads on my 16 mile work commute each way...currently only getting 29mpg in eco mode and im a relatively gentle driver.
I have the 1.0L turbo SR, I do a mix of dual carriageway and b roads on my 16 mile work commute each way...currently only getting 29mpg in eco mode and im a relatively gentle driver.
Mate I’m doing 41mpg with mine in London. Mix M25 and city driving on a 24 mile commute round trip . What works for me is as less gear changes as possible and breaking as less as possible. You don’t want to push the acceleration too much.
I have a 2009 8th gen Civic with 1,8 naturally aspirated R18 engine, been flooring it since then for 100k miles already, still I've never had 29 mpg suburban consumption even when doing 90-100 mph on highways.
I cant help being a little bit sceptical about a 1,0 liter engine is such a large car. So while 129 hp is more than enough, I would go for the 1,5. It will provide effortless power in all situations, and real world fuel consumption will likely be much closer to the 1,0, than it is in the artificial EU-test. If you are a really high mileage user, wait for the diesel.
I'd go for the 1.5 litre as well if I'm honest, but for a three-cylinder engine it's really quite good. And yes, if you're driving high mileage the diesel might be better, but we'll have to drive it first to find out! SW
fundiver198 and that's exactly why here in Pakistan Honda only released the 1.5 turbo and 1.8 engine variants ...sadly we don't get hatchbacks here yet
We skipped the 1.0 litre here in Canada. Only 2.0 and 1.5 litre since we pay fuel excise taxes, not on engine displacement. The 1.5 doesn’t have to work anywhere near as hard-peak torque occurring at 1800 RPM-so you can keep it in 5th or 6th gear for 40 MPH driving and it will still pull. It will likely return better real world fuel economy.
I know that the shouldn't be compared because of the price and the size of them but..How does the driving experience compare to the new swift you reviewed recently in terms of an agile car fun to drive, as a first car? I really like your video reviews, keep up the good work!
Next he’ll talk about the colour, I want to know engineering detail. Honda doesn’t give information on its web site, I mean things like is it direct injection, if so in what configuration, how many sensors, where, doing what. How does the computer control, what cpu does it use. What octane fuel does it use. How does the gear box work etc
I get 38-40mpg, pretty good for a 1.0l VTEC Turbo petrol - and it handles + performs excellent for a 1.0L engine, you would never think its a 1.0L its so strong! (feels more like a 1.5 or 1.8l engine with the type of response and performance it achieves (VTEC technology is amazing))
Luka Nobody will really know if there are any little weaknesses for a while yet because it's an all new engine. But it comes with a three year/90,000 mile warranty in the UK.
It may be getting on a bit but it is good enough to hold its own. I would much rather the current 1.6 at the price theyre offering than pay £2-3k more for a newer version which in all likelihood wouldn't make that much difference.
Terrible review. Work on your present skills. There was very little objective info. A good review should blend facts with opinion presented in a confident way. Your not selling us the car (unless they sponsor u) have some fun!!
@@robovac3557Maybe Mazda 3 it's better for more modern interior but in all other things (external futuristic look/design, performance, speed, acceleration, engine, fuel consumption, quality etc) Honda Civic is far superior in that class of vehicles.
Ugliest honda ever. The rear end is an abomination, the lights, bumper and bootlid all look like they belong on different cars, and the front end isn't much better.It may be a good car but it looks horrendous.
Steven Macdonald I wasn't impressed, thought it was designed by dyson Hoover's.. then I looked around one in person, started to warm towards it, went and looked the next week, now really love it.??.. just seems to grow on you, looks better every time I see them..
![MV วิถีชีวิตใต้ - ผา อัยย๊ะ [Official MV HD]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nODlkOUu9B0/mqdefault.jpg)
I have the pleasure of owning a 1.0 EX Sportline and absolutely love it!
@RR PLAN C to each their own. I had a 1.6 VTEC Sport EP2 and a 1.8 SE. The handling and performance trumps both. Admittedly, it’s not a Type R but, it does me fine. Still love it.
@@KuroMicra Yeah its an awesome car, I have a 2017 Civic SR in Red and it looks so nice and is a joy to drive. Its amazing how good of a driver's car it really is, and drives very sporty at high revs.
Hi, I just bought the car yesterday at 53000 miles. Is the ticking sound in the engine normal? Also, at what sort of mileage did you change the timing belt? Thanks
Honda finally figured out what Suzuki already knew in 1987! 1987 chevy sprint turbo fuel injected turbo charged 1.0liter. It got 50-60mpg on 87octane. Built by.... SUZUKI
Two Spiralmaxes in the exhaust and two in the intake will give you greater economy and power.
Solid review though the short burst of Bourne supremacy shaky cam was jaunting, steering tech sounds like fun.
Great review! I actually test drove the same model last week, and to be honest, I wasn't expecting much from a 1l, 3 pot, even with the turbo. However, I was really surprised with how smooth the engine was, and how slick the gearbox was. I wasn't keen on the look either, but once I saw it in person in the showroom, I really changed my mind. I was tempted with the 1.5 sport version, but my local Honda dealer told me there was quite a long wait for that model- 16 weeks. Moreover, in reality, I know that the model I'd test driven would be more than adequate for my needs, so I ordered one in rallye red. I've watched quite a few of your reviews, and always find them extremely well balanced. It's refreshing to see reviews minus the gimmicks, and clarkson-esque humour.
Hi Simon. Wow, thank you for all of that. Agreed, engine and gearbox on the 3-pot are both brilliant. Well done on ordering one! When will it arrive? As for our reviews, you're too kind, thank you. It takes a lot of work to put one together, so it's good to know people are watching and enjoying! SW
I should be collecting sometime towards the end of June.
Well, I've had the Civic for a couple of weeks now, and I'm quite impressed with it. I love the smooth gearbox, cabin layout, cabin and boot space, and the electric lumbar support. The ride quality is surprisingly good, as is front visibility. The rear visibility was always going to be compromised by the spoiler, but I haven't had any noticeable problems, plus the rear view camera does help to mitigate this when reversing.
I'm also impressed with the variable ratio steering, which makes driving around twisty A roads rather fun. Allied to the multi link rear suspension, I feel very reassured when cornering at speed. The turn in is far better than I expected too.
I was expecting the infotainment to be disappointing, judging by some of the reviews, but after a good play around, it's not really all that bad. It certainly isn't class leading, but I've found it perfectly acceptable.
That 1 litre engine really is a gem, apart from the somewhat throaty rapid rasp I get in 1st gear, once you move up gears, it's pretty refined for such a small engine.
I'm still not keen on the rear end styling, but, other than that, I'm really happy with my purchase.
Simon Mellor how you getting on with this now mate?
I have the 1.0L turbo SR, I do a mix of dual carriageway and b roads on my 16 mile work commute each way...currently only getting 29mpg in eco mode and im a relatively gentle driver.
Hi , can you tell me 1.0 Litre Turbo (1000cc) having no issue with Hill driving(up county ) ?
Nice reveiw - these new small engines are amazing.
Thanks for commenting again! They are, and they're getting better and better every year.
I test drove both and honestly, the 1.0 3 cylinder is better.
It's a great little engine. Speak to anyone in Honda and they're very proud of it!
@@newmotoring try two Spiralmaxes in the exhaust and two in the intake.. . will give you greater economy and power.
Lol
lol at first I though who is this kid reviewing
I at first wondered if he was old enough to drive but after that, I just thought he hadn't found the seat hight adjustment.
I have the 1.0L turbo SR, I do a mix of dual carriageway and b roads on my 16 mile work commute each way...currently only getting 29mpg in eco mode and im a relatively gentle driver.
Interesting... Whereabouts are you? UK?
Is it manual or CVT?
That's not good bud thinking of buying 1, have a 16 plate dtec it's fabulous
Mate I’m doing 41mpg with mine in London. Mix M25 and city driving on a 24 mile commute round trip . What works for me is as less gear changes as possible and breaking as less as possible. You don’t want to push the acceleration too much.
I have a 2009 8th gen Civic with 1,8 naturally aspirated R18 engine, been flooring it since then for 100k miles already, still I've never had 29 mpg suburban consumption even when doing 90-100 mph on highways.
Great Video Review and I liked the Model you reviewed
Thanks Jamie!
Is it bullet proof Honda engineering?
Hi guys is there a big difference between the 2017 version and 2019 version. Just to confirm both are the new design and are 1 litre..
I cant help being a little bit sceptical about a 1,0 liter engine is such a large car. So while 129 hp is more than enough, I would go for the 1,5. It will provide effortless power in all situations, and real world fuel consumption will likely be much closer to the 1,0, than it is in the artificial EU-test. If you are a really high mileage user, wait for the diesel.
I'd go for the 1.5 litre as well if I'm honest, but for a three-cylinder engine it's really quite good. And yes, if you're driving high mileage the diesel might be better, but we'll have to drive it first to find out! SW
fundiver198 and that's exactly why here in Pakistan Honda only released the 1.5 turbo and 1.8 engine variants ...sadly we don't get hatchbacks here yet
We skipped the 1.0 litre here in Canada. Only 2.0 and 1.5 litre since we pay fuel excise taxes, not on engine displacement. The 1.5 doesn’t have to work anywhere near as hard-peak torque occurring at 1800 RPM-so you can keep it in 5th or 6th gear for 40 MPH driving and it will still pull. It will likely return better real world fuel economy.
Пять лет назад был 2017-й год, а уже обозревали модель 2019-го года... Прям Нострадамусы... 🤣👍
I know that the shouldn't be compared because of the price and the size of them but..How does the driving experience compare to the new swift you reviewed recently in terms of an agile car fun to drive, as a first car?
I really like your video reviews, keep up the good work!
Civic is better I think, its more low to the ground and has an aerodynamic setting, its got great handling and fine tuned performance
I absolutely love it ;-) Also the black trim is awesome.
Anyone of you ever driven something like B16 3-stage VTEC? What's wrong with you Honda?
Nice review! Thank you... Ignore the negative comments :)
Was that piggy on left side on 3:11 ?
Next he’ll talk about the colour, I want to know engineering detail. Honda doesn’t give information on its web site, I mean things like is it direct injection, if so in what configuration, how many sensors, where, doing what. How does the computer control, what cpu does it use. What octane fuel does it use. How does the gear box work etc
What kind of mileage do you get with such a small engine?
I get 38-40mpg, pretty good for a 1.0l VTEC Turbo petrol - and it handles + performs excellent for a 1.0L engine, you would never think its a 1.0L its so strong! (feels more like a 1.5 or 1.8l engine with the type of response and performance it achieves (VTEC technology is amazing))
@@theweeknd2725 my ep2 gets 45mpg
can someome tell me is this engine good when it comes to reliability?
Luka Nobody will really know if there are any little weaknesses for a while yet because it's an all new engine. But it comes with a three year/90,000 mile warranty in the UK.
tnx
Try two Spiralmaxes in the exhaust and two in the intake. It will give you greater economy and power.
What ?
1.0 litre yea we def dont have that in the US
I've changed 3 of these engines already. Not good
What do you mean? Please explain.
@@PAUL-ESNEED vtech and turbo failure due to particles getting into the oil and blocking the gauze filters feeding them.
Wet belt in the 1.0. Disastrous.
Is that a pedal car for the driver😂😂
I wish Honda made a new diesel engine, say a 3cyl diesel.. The 1.6 is getting on a bit..
Still a too Engin I have a 2016 it's f fabulous
It may be getting on a bit but it is good enough to hold its own. I would much rather the current 1.6 at the price theyre offering than pay £2-3k more for a newer version which in all likelihood wouldn't make that much difference.
Terrible review. Work on your present skills. There was very little objective info. A good review should blend facts with opinion presented in a confident way. Your not selling us the car (unless they sponsor u) have some fun!!
Car is poor. Huge chunks of piano plastic, inside and out. Steering is very heavy. Feels cheap.
🤣
@@hondamanvtec2894 I test drove the civic and mazda 3 same day. Mazda 3 superior in every way.
@@robovac3557Maybe Mazda 3 it's better for more modern interior but in all other things (external futuristic look/design, performance, speed, acceleration, engine, fuel consumption, quality etc) Honda Civic is far superior in that class of vehicles.
Ugliest honda ever. The rear end is an abomination, the lights, bumper and bootlid all look like they belong on different cars, and the front end isn't much better.It may be a good car but it looks horrendous.
It's not to everyone's tastes, that's for sure...
Steven Macdonald best looking one in the last 12 years
Steven Macdonald
I wasn't impressed, thought it was designed by dyson Hoover's.. then I looked around one in person, started to warm towards it, went and looked the next week, now really love it.??.. just seems to grow on you, looks better every time I see them..
Best looking Civic they've ever made in my opinion, and very different to all the other cars in the class...