Sure but do we not discuss everything? You discuss govt, education, Science, your health care, sports, but somehow religion is off-limits? Why? Because all the above have FACTS! Religion has none, zero! And they protect themselves by making sure questions are condemned, with a willing media doing their bid
Think more deeply about that. Do you really think that someone has the right to believe that they can fly planes into buildings killing innocent people ? I think I understand the positive message you're sending , and I agree to a point . But ,,, sometimes that message means " I'll respect your religion if you respect mine " People don't want everybody's religion respected ,,, they want their religion respected. I hope you don't take my comment personal, It's really not meant to be. Its just a thought.
For readers, atheists can have the logical question of (what is the origin of the universe?), but just because we really don't know, it doesn't mean it's the God of any religion because I can prove for every religion how and why their God isn't real, the God of christianity, Islam, the Gods of Hinduism, Judaism, etc, stop the faith child abuse, indoctrination
An agnostic is a person who hasn't given the subject that extra two minutes of thought, to realize that they are in fact an atheist. This isn't about a choice .
(a) What is atheism? The answer is given in the word, some say: A-Theism = NO-God-belief. - My name is not Jokp Fylox, what is my name? I don't live in Nuioh, where do I live? My code is not 20321 what is it? None of these questions can be answered with even microscopic probable certainty. Nor, what is atheism. Only well-defined pairs of 2 opposites can be answered with, NOT; like this: I am not she = I am he, not night=day etc. (b) What about to believe?: It is; to be quite sure, but not absolutely sure. Absolutely sure is: To Know. So: Not believe: To be unsure but not absolutely unsure. The same as ´to believe´! The concept of God is only implied as something higher and more powerful than us, to define or describe it more accurately is impossible. So what does NO-God belief become in this clarification: To be unsure but not absolutely unsure, whether something higher and more powerful than me, but not more precisely defined, exists, in this case God. (c) What the general public believes to be scientific evidence or proof rides the same humanity like a demon. The whole concept of proof has its origins in the mathematical method: An example of a mathematical proof: 449 is a prime number. Proof: No prime less than 21 divides 449. - Now how is a method like that to be transferred to all phenomena in the World or the Universe? So far there is NO possibility to generally use this method in the world, only in special cases, and Kurt Gödel prooved logically in 1931 that there are true statements in any logical system, that can not be prooven. Undecidable questions have even arisen in physics, suggesting that incompleteness afflicts not just math, but in some little understood way, The Reality. About the World and Reality, we must use the method of observation. And observations do not always give the whole picture, so theories must constantly be adjusted in line with new observations. Thus, existing phenomena may have inaccessible evidences - I have no evidence, just a question: (d) The answer to whether one believes in or the outlook on life one has can, because the word ´belief´ is fluid and the term God is only implied as something elevated over us, cannot therefore be answered with: I do not believe in God, I am an Atheist. The question must be clarified like this: I didn't ask what you don't believe, I asked what your outlook on life IS, what IS being an atheist, or what is the content of atheism? Someone will then try to rewrite NOT with other words: Rejection of, refutation of, lacking, dismissing, absence of etc... It doesn't help much. If the atheists have someting to say at all, the question must have a NOT-free answer. (e) Then I get lectured in that atheism is no beliefsystem, has no message, no philosofy, no answer, nothing; just ordinary people that has not got any evidence. But this is just a rewriting of NOT, so I ask: What are you lacking evidence of? "God" they answer. I ask then: What is that, describe that? - no answer - Then the atheist instead proudly explains: "We are not from the stoneage, we are modern. We have lazer tools, microscopes, telescopes, satelites, computers and cars etc., we dont need to believe in anything." - These tools give us greater opportunity to see how things happen, why things happen is in lesser degree revealed, and they often generate more questions than they answer. They do not explain why matter organizes, and things (forms) are assembled, and the nature of consciousness is still inaccessible to science. (f) Then the atheist deliver one spectacular devastating selfdestructing blow after another: "God belief is exactly parallell to this: Believer(theist): I believe unicorns exist. - Nonbeliever(atheist): I do not believe unicorns exist." - But unicorns are well defined and described fantasy animals and that gives us opportunity to search for one, and noone has ever found one on Earth. The idea of God is neither well defined and possible to describe in any detail, and this idea does not even belong to the category of ´things´. The atheists now clames that I have a personal problem that dont concerns them if I dont accept definitions with; NOT. But I only want to know what atheism contains. So that claim is synonymous to; If anyone want to know what atheism is, they have a personal problem! (g) Now the atheist tries to divert the subject by asking; why he should believe in the Christian god, out of 1000 other hungry gods who have to be fed with newborn children and people, drink blood and torture animals and humans to death? - In that case, the Christian God (Christ) is the opposite to all of this, so that could be a good reason for the atheist to become a Christian, but does he want that? "No, the 1000 gods dont exist", he say. "Ok, I understand, but describe in all details what it is that doesnt exist." Now the atheist gets angry and fights for his life; ridicules my horrible english and tells me to seek professional help, and tries a last desperat attempt to save himself by claiming that the burden of proof that God exists is on the believers, not the atheists. But Kurt Goedel proved in 1931 that there exist true statements that cannot be proven even in the well defined logical systems of consistent theories. So the burden of proof that they are true cannot possibly be on Kurt Goedel, exactly because he proved that they cannot be proven true, but STILL are TRUE. So the atheist are in urgent need to explain why they dont think such statements are true, contrary to the Goedel principle. When atheists reject this prooven principle the burden of dis-proof of it is on the atheist, but that cant be done. That leaves the burden of disproof of God on the atheist. But noone gives it! (h) Hundreds of atheist videoes have got this comment, but not a single factual counter-comment, just comments that scold this as nonsense and a meaningless wall of word-salad, or personal attacks and characterisations of me as an idiot that tries to look wise by cooking soup with advanced words(even though I dont use any). Never a comment that explains what is nonsense and why. - NOT ONE! - So every such harassing counter-comment is proof that I hit the rotten point where atheism collapses. (i) But once again I give atheists a chanse to explain what they positively without negatives, stand for: I want an answer from an atheist about the CONTENT of atheism without not, absence, rejection, dismissing etc. I am not satisfied with that definition with negatives; What is left of the atheist when all the NOTs (negatives) have done their job? Science? I also believe in science, but I am not an atheist. "We dont believe in God", they shout a bit louder, as if that helps. Describe that? I ask. And the atheist cannot answer, and even ask me for what evidence I have, or tells me to ask those who believe in God about it! So the atheists depend on the believers to tell them what not to believe in! But the believers cannot define or describe God, noone can. And round and round it goes, . . so I will give my answer:
(j) Even though atheism by the atheists own clame is nothing; the atheists are something. Millions og people deprived by satanistic propaganda, of any meaning, purpose, direction, hope and inspiration in life what so ever. That is dangerous, extreemly dangerous! The theists, while having the same definitional problem as atheists, at least have the humility to look up to something higher unfathomable in wonder, awe, inspiration and longing. This the atheists cannot do, and they cannot accept that others have it. They are driven by self-satisfaction and selfimportance. They want to ridicule those who have perceived something they do not see, all atheist videos show that. Atheism is therefore pride in the strongest form and therefore the original sin. The origin of sin! The orgin of human degradation. When one does not want to look up to something higher and more powerful than oneself, then it is only oneself and that which is lower than oneself that can be seen. When you think yourself are at the mountaintop, all further movement will lead downward. If you have no higher idea about life and existence, then: Down you go! And in this context that means destruction, breakdown, dissolution, disaster, desperation, aimless flight downwards and downwards to death and unconsciousness. And in time it will spread to everything, both personal, cultural, scientific, artistic, moral - EVERYTHING That is WHAT Atheism is. Don't go that way!
(k) If, on the other hand, one has something higher which is not just a word or an abstract, theoretical and very vaguely defined concept, but a supreme concrete example - Jesus Christ son of God - which we can visualize through concrete sources, then we always have something to reach for and we are securely anchored in the highest.
lol primitive people living under Kings/Dictators made your Gods We must get down on our knees, beg, grovel for his mercy, submit to him and pleased he will reward us with the good life in Heaven Is that it? Such stupidity!
1 Corinthians 15:1-4 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand; 2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain. 3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; 4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
Manmade Quotes from Paul The Antichrist, Benny Sinn'z Great Great Great Grandfather. Holey Eternal Omnipresent Greetingz. May the Pickle Jarz of Indoctrination be Broken ⚡️🤴
I said I don't care if they are jew Muslims what people are I care about there souls and if you don't care about what I posted why would you reply to it if it is so fake what does it matter to you see you seen the gospel and got offended just like the bible. says people would do because Jesus said the gospel is foolish to them who don't believe and you are one of the people see he even died for you to because you are a sinner to just like everyone else look at the ten commandments that will show see you need him more then you think you do you just choce not to believe Because that is the free will he give you when he created you choose the world over God and if you would but your faith in him from your heart you will see the truth and if you don't you won't may the grace of our lord Jesus Christ be with you John 3:16 King James Version 16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
God made in the image of the King/Dictator of the past "We must get down on our knees, swear eternal loyalty and obedience, beg for his mercy and hope he will be pleased and reward us(Heaven)" Amazing that such primitive views of God are the top religions of the day! God a Putin, a Saddam!
The incontrovertible fact that a gravitationally bound system of the sun and objects that orbit it directly or indirectly which man has been unable to replicate anywhere is enough proof that there is a God.
Tee el if you can recreate the entire solar system again,No I will make it easier, create a planet with all the money on earth then we can talk.For now you are apparently lost.
@@AA-mc8sr create a planet with all the money on earth should be proof? 🤔 As someone else has already commented, I'm starting to think you're either on drugs or you're just straight up trolling.
You cannot be taught anything unless its God breathed and God designed. Even the science we learn comes from an intelligent spiritual being. Intelligence which goes against God was created and thought out by an intelligent being. Satan, and God created everything good in this. Things we get for free. Friends, family, love, relationships, music, etc. All the devil can do is warp versions of Gods intelligence. Just like i can add or take away words from a book you wrote and then publish it saying i wrote it. God loves and cares for creation. But the question is do you love God enough to accept and respect Him.
@@thechessdungeon Wait there, you are complaining about Gods forgiveness and love and conditional relational activity with men. That is a theology which deserves hell.
@@joshuamartinpryce1237 Its not conditional if hell is involved Also the reason why God chose this path to create everyone is because he enjoys drama If he had created a world without sin or etc, then there will be nothing special about God He thrives because you believe you are broken (I don't believe in God)
7:30 for what the title claims the video is about.
THANK YOU!
I kept fast forwarding
Everyone has a right to their own beliefs, so let's just be good to ourselves. Maybe later we will be able to find answers to our questions.
Sure but do we not discuss everything? You discuss govt, education, Science, your health care, sports, but somehow religion is off-limits? Why?
Because all the above have FACTS! Religion has none, zero!
And they protect themselves by making sure questions are condemned, with a willing media doing their bid
Think more deeply about that. Do you really think that someone has the right to believe that they can fly planes into buildings killing innocent people ?
I think I understand the positive message you're sending , and I agree to a point . But ,,, sometimes that message means
" I'll respect your religion if you respect mine "
People don't want everybody's religion respected ,,, they want their religion respected. I hope you don't take my comment personal,
It's really not meant to be. Its just a thought.
For readers, atheists can have the logical question of (what is the origin of the universe?), but just because we really don't know, it doesn't mean it's the God of any religion because I can prove for every religion how and why their God isn't real, the God of christianity, Islam, the Gods of Hinduism, Judaism, etc, stop the faith child abuse, indoctrination
No. The God of Christ is real. You absolutely cannot disprove that God exists.
@@natsusatsujinki8342 A pot is between Mars and Earth because you can't disprove it
@@thechessdungeon and how many witnessed the pot? Definitely not you because I doubt you left earth. Basically your argument is invalid.
@@natsusatsujinki8342 As well as yours because you just said God is real
Because you can't disprove it
You can't disprove the pot because it's possible it's there
Why did you apply the same logic for God like the pot
The title is so misleading.
An agnostic is a person who hasn't given the subject that extra two minutes of thought, to realize that they are in fact an atheist.
This isn't about a choice .
Jump to 7:35
Story Story 🙄😂😂😂
(a) What is atheism? The answer is given in the word, some say: A-Theism = NO-God-belief. - My name is not Jokp Fylox, what is my name? I don't live in Nuioh, where do I live? My code is not 20321 what is it? None of these questions can be answered with even microscopic probable certainty. Nor, what is atheism. Only well-defined pairs of 2 opposites can be answered with, NOT; like this: I am not she = I am he, not night=day etc.
(b) What about to believe?: It is; to be quite sure, but not absolutely sure. Absolutely sure is: To Know. So: Not believe: To be unsure but not absolutely unsure. The same as ´to believe´! The concept of God is only implied as something higher and more powerful than us, to define or describe it more accurately is impossible. So what does NO-God belief become in this clarification: To be unsure but not absolutely unsure, whether something higher and more powerful than me, but not more precisely defined, exists, in this case God.
(c) What the general public believes to be scientific evidence or proof rides the same humanity like a demon. The whole concept of proof has its origins in the mathematical method: An example of a mathematical proof: 449 is a prime number. Proof: No prime less than 21 divides 449. - Now how is a method like that to be transferred to all phenomena in the World or the Universe? So far there is NO possibility to generally use this method in the world, only in special cases, and Kurt Gödel prooved logically in 1931 that there are true statements in any logical system, that can not be prooven. Undecidable questions have even arisen in physics, suggesting that incompleteness afflicts not just math, but in some little understood way, The Reality. About the World and Reality, we must use the method of observation. And observations do not always give the whole picture, so theories must constantly be adjusted in line with new observations. Thus, existing phenomena may have inaccessible evidences - I have no evidence, just a question:
(d) The answer to whether one believes in or the outlook on life one has can, because the word ´belief´ is fluid and the term God is only implied as something elevated over us, cannot therefore be answered with: I do not believe in God, I am an Atheist. The question must be clarified like this: I didn't ask what you don't believe, I asked what your outlook on life IS, what IS being an atheist, or what is the content of atheism? Someone will then try to rewrite NOT with other words: Rejection of, refutation of, lacking, dismissing, absence of etc... It doesn't help much. If the atheists have someting to say at all, the question must have a NOT-free answer.
(e) Then I get lectured in that atheism is no beliefsystem, has no message, no philosofy, no answer, nothing; just ordinary people that has not got any evidence. But this is just a rewriting of NOT, so I ask: What are you lacking evidence of? "God" they answer. I ask then: What is that, describe that? - no answer - Then the atheist instead proudly explains: "We are not from the stoneage, we are modern. We have lazer tools, microscopes, telescopes, satelites, computers and cars etc., we dont need to believe in anything." - These tools give us greater opportunity to see how things happen, why things happen is in lesser degree revealed, and they often generate more questions than they answer. They do not explain why matter organizes, and things (forms) are assembled, and the nature of consciousness is still inaccessible to science.
(f) Then the atheist deliver one spectacular devastating selfdestructing blow after another: "God belief is exactly parallell to this: Believer(theist): I believe unicorns exist. - Nonbeliever(atheist): I do not believe unicorns exist." - But unicorns are well defined and described fantasy animals and that gives us opportunity to search for one, and noone has ever found one on Earth. The idea of God is neither well defined and possible to describe in any detail, and this idea does not even belong to the category of ´things´. The atheists now clames that I have a personal problem that dont concerns them if I dont accept definitions with; NOT. But I only want to know what atheism contains. So that claim is synonymous to; If anyone want to know what atheism is, they have a personal problem!
(g) Now the atheist tries to divert the subject by asking; why he should believe in the Christian god, out of 1000 other hungry gods who have to be fed with newborn children and people, drink blood and torture animals and humans to death? - In that case, the Christian God (Christ) is the opposite to all of this, so that could be a good reason for the atheist to become a Christian, but does he want that? "No, the 1000 gods dont exist", he say. "Ok, I understand, but describe in all details what it is that doesnt exist." Now the atheist gets angry and fights for his life; ridicules my horrible english and tells me to seek professional help, and tries a last desperat attempt to save himself by claiming that the burden of proof that God exists is on the believers, not the atheists. But Kurt Goedel proved in 1931 that there exist true statements that cannot be proven even in the well defined logical systems of consistent theories. So the burden of proof that they are true cannot possibly be on Kurt Goedel, exactly because he proved that they cannot be proven true, but STILL are TRUE. So the atheist are in urgent need to explain why they dont think such statements are true, contrary to the Goedel principle. When atheists reject this prooven principle the burden of dis-proof of it is on the atheist, but that cant be done. That leaves the burden of disproof of God on the atheist. But noone gives it!
(h) Hundreds of atheist videoes have got this comment, but not a single factual counter-comment, just comments that scold this as nonsense and a meaningless wall of word-salad, or personal attacks and characterisations of me as an idiot that tries to look wise by cooking soup with advanced words(even though I dont use any). Never a comment that explains what is nonsense and why. - NOT ONE! - So every such harassing counter-comment is proof that I hit the rotten point where atheism collapses.
(i) But once again I give atheists a chanse to explain what they positively without negatives, stand for: I want an answer from an atheist about the CONTENT of atheism without not, absence, rejection, dismissing etc. I am not satisfied with that definition with negatives; What is left of the atheist when all the NOTs (negatives) have done their job? Science? I also believe in science, but I am not an atheist. "We dont believe in God", they shout a bit louder, as if that helps. Describe that? I ask. And the atheist cannot answer, and even ask me for what evidence I have, or tells me to ask those who believe in God about it! So the atheists depend on the believers to tell them what not to believe in! But the believers cannot define or describe God, noone can. And round and round it goes, . . so I will give my answer:
(j) Even though atheism by the atheists own clame is nothing; the atheists are something. Millions og people deprived by satanistic propaganda, of any meaning, purpose, direction, hope and inspiration in life what so ever. That is dangerous, extreemly dangerous! The theists, while having the same definitional problem as atheists, at least have the humility to look up to something higher unfathomable in wonder, awe, inspiration and longing. This the atheists cannot do, and they cannot accept that others have it. They are driven by self-satisfaction and selfimportance. They want to ridicule those who have perceived something they do not see, all atheist videos show that. Atheism is therefore pride in the strongest form and therefore the original sin. The origin of sin! The orgin of human degradation. When one does not want to look up to something higher and more powerful than oneself, then it is only oneself and that which is lower than oneself that can be seen. When you think yourself are at the mountaintop, all further movement will lead downward. If you have no higher idea about life and existence, then: Down you go! And in this context that means destruction, breakdown, dissolution, disaster, desperation, aimless flight downwards and downwards to death and unconsciousness. And in time it will spread to everything, both personal, cultural, scientific, artistic, moral - EVERYTHING That is WHAT Atheism is. Don't go that way!
(k) If, on the other hand, one has something higher which is not just a word or an abstract, theoretical and very vaguely defined concept, but a supreme concrete example - Jesus Christ son of God - which we can visualize through concrete sources, then we always have something to reach for and we are securely anchored in the highest.
Nonsense
Cant stand d host
Not much about atheism. Keep making omelettes.
Al Qur'an is the answer you need.
Read it then let talk
Your father wrote the qur'an???
The book written by a pedophile? 😂
lol primitive people living under Kings/Dictators made your Gods
We must get down on our knees, beg, grovel for his mercy, submit to him and pleased he will reward us with the good life in Heaven
Is that it? Such stupidity!
The same book saying sperm comes btn backbone and stomach😂😂
I read quran and it is buch of shit belive me. Lol
1 Corinthians 15:1-4
Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand;
2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain.
3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures;
4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
Manmade Quotes from Paul The Antichrist, Benny Sinn'z Great Great Great Grandfather. Holey Eternal Omnipresent Greetingz. May the Pickle Jarz of Indoctrination be Broken ⚡️🤴
Over half of the population in Nigeria is Muslim... In what universe is your comment in any way useful?
@@haudace i don't care what they are Jesus is for everyone even you.
@@mirandarogers3595 as much as you don't care about them, I similarly don't care about your fantasy make beliefs.
I said I don't care if they are jew Muslims what people are I care about there souls and if you don't care about what I posted why would you reply to it if it is so fake what does it matter to you see you seen the gospel and got offended just like the bible. says people would do because Jesus said the gospel is foolish to them who don't believe and you are one of the people see he even died for you to because you are a sinner to just like everyone else look at the ten commandments that will show see you need him more then you think you do you just choce not to believe Because that is the free will he give you when he created you choose the world over God and if you would but your faith in him from your heart you will see the truth and if you don't you won't may the grace of our lord Jesus Christ be with you John 3:16
King James Version
16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
He will find out there is a God when he dies
Zainab, you are a FOOL... get your proof first.
God made in the image of the King/Dictator of the past
"We must get down on our knees, swear eternal loyalty and obedience, beg for his mercy and hope he will be pleased and reward us(Heaven)"
Amazing that such primitive views of God are the top religions of the day!
God a Putin, a Saddam!
No he won’t cos he’ll be dead.
Thats already assuming god is real.
How do you know which God it is?
The incontrovertible fact that a gravitationally bound system of the sun and objects that orbit it directly or indirectly which man has been unable to replicate anywhere is enough proof that there is a God.
AA... Proof of what???... Are you high???
Lol,... And this...is proof that using big words doesn't mean that you know that you're talking about.
Tee el if you can recreate the entire solar system again,No I will make it easier, create a planet with all the money on earth then we can talk.For now you are apparently lost.
@@AA-mc8sr create a planet with all the money on earth should be proof? 🤔 As someone else has already commented, I'm starting to think you're either on drugs or you're just straight up trolling.
No, it's enough proof for Amaterasu.
Do you accept the Divinity Lord Amaterasu?
You cannot be taught anything unless its God breathed and God designed. Even the science we learn comes from an intelligent spiritual being. Intelligence which goes against God was created and thought out by an intelligent being. Satan, and God created everything good in this. Things we get for free. Friends, family, love, relationships, music, etc. All the devil can do is warp versions of Gods intelligence. Just like i can add or take away words from a book you wrote and then publish it saying i wrote it. God loves and cares for creation. But the question is do you love God enough to accept and respect Him.
Your comment doesn't make any sense😑
I wonder why God is so obsessed with love
I guess he created you because he needs a good story
@@thechessdungeon Wait there, you are complaining about Gods forgiveness and love and conditional relational activity with men. That is a theology which deserves hell.
@@joshuamartinpryce1237 Its not conditional if hell is involved
Also the reason why God chose this path to create everyone is because he enjoys drama
If he had created a world without sin or etc, then there will be nothing special about God
He thrives because you believe you are broken (I don't believe in God)
Stop talking as if you're in an abusive relationship
God cares for his creation and people die everyday under him