Review: Air Jordan 1 Retro High OG "Bred" (2013 vs. 2016)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ก.ย. 2024
  • With this past weekend's crazy release now over and with the dust all settled, I highlight the differences between the 2013 "Bred" 1 versus its 2016 updated counterpart. With slight variations between both versions, both with their pros and cons, which year's Bred 1s do you prefer?
    Instagram: / sgo8
    Twitter: / sgo8
    Flickr: www.flickr.com...
    Music: The Passion HiFi - The Art of Soul - Hip Hop
    / free-the-passion-hifi-...

ความคิดเห็น • 83

  • @rayjaro6893
    @rayjaro6893 8 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    One of the most in depth comparisons for the 13' and 16' 👍🏼👍🏼

    • @SeanGo
      @SeanGo  8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Respect!

  • @dextarlestat7172
    @dextarlestat7172 8 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    2016 of course, the right size and the better leather finishing.

  • @TheOthminator
    @TheOthminator 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I got the 2013s used for 30 dollars from a thrift shop in Kuwait. They had no idea what they are. They are 100% legit and barely used. In really excellent condition wayy better than used sold online.

  • @otakusamsay1953
    @otakusamsay1953 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    For anyone who sees this in the future. The '16 and '85 reds are about the same. The brighter red is something JB did with the '94 and it was at it's brightest with the '01 pair. They dialed it back with later releases but the shade of red on the 16's are the closest to the OG.

  • @kodman619
    @kodman619 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    2013 is way more like the original. Tumbled leather and skinny swoosh of the 16 are deal breakers.

    • @JohnnyAntonio956
      @JohnnyAntonio956 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Mos definitely a deal breaker 13’s look hella better smooth leather bigger swoosh makes it the closest to the og for sure

  • @DashDrones
    @DashDrones 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Loved this comparison, the 2016's are 🔥
    I have a 2013 pair of Chicago's and they're almost identical in shape to the Breds from the same year.

  • @1LE_Ciko
    @1LE_Ciko 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    2013 Jordan’s leather was so good but the shape was amazing the 2016 breds and 2017 royals have such a bulky shape and that that tumble leather don’t do it for me

  • @JTS0110
    @JTS0110 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    i have both the 2013 and the 2016 pairs and they are both great but i have to say i prefer the 2016 pair more. 2016 has higher cut and better leather for sure.

  • @christophertrujillo719
    @christophertrujillo719 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    2013 breds are soo much better than the 2016. the 2016 is too dark and hate the tumble leather which kills it and wish it was that glossy smooth leather like the 2013

  • @mjo23dan
    @mjo23dan 8 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Very nice comprehensive review Sean. Excellent work!

    • @SeanGo
      @SeanGo  8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks 🙏🏼

  • @FifaMessi010
    @FifaMessi010 7 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    2013 is closer to the 1985 version but the 2016 do have better leather at least in the look since it's tumbled leather but 2013 wins for me

    • @galvinisby5395
      @galvinisby5395 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same

    • @otakusamsay1953
      @otakusamsay1953 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      2016 is closer to 85's/94's save for the tumbled. The 2013 is more like the jumpan jordan 1 releases.

    • @tonihill5274
      @tonihill5274 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      2013 is closer to the 85, straighter back, wider toe box, larger swoosh. The leather on the 2016 is tumbled, making it look better and feel softer. I doubt there is that much different in quality.

  • @Emmet19
    @Emmet19 8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Your production quality is a1

    • @SeanGo
      @SeanGo  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks man 👊🏼👊🏼👊🏼

  • @whoopswag24
    @whoopswag24 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Bought the 2013 pair, sold them when I found out 2016 was dropping then I sold the 2016 to re buy the 2013. Nice leather quality on the 2016 but the shoe itself just doesn’t pop. The red is too dull on 2016 pair and the “good leather quality” takes away from the pop imo. I prefer the brighter red and the smooth leather better.

    • @TheOthminator
      @TheOthminator 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I bought 2013 used from a thrift shop that did not know what they are for 30 dollars. They are barely used toooo. I live in kuwait

    • @JohnnyAntonio956
      @JohnnyAntonio956 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      13 way better leather, reds better, swoosh is better, not a fan of tumbled and skinny ass swoosh

  • @galvinisby5395
    @galvinisby5395 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    2013 are better

  • @samonn7350
    @samonn7350 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    2016 Nike air logo have two R on the tongue 2013 don't.

  • @pattonPwr
    @pattonPwr 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm in search of a pair.. from this review which one should I go for? I read that the 13 is more like the original but the 16 has a better quality leather. Help please! :) thanks

    • @SeanGo
      @SeanGo  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I’d go 2016

  • @FatalCorleone07
    @FatalCorleone07 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    HONEST OPINION: these or the OG Shattered Backboards??

    • @SeanGo
      @SeanGo  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      FatalCorleone07 These definitely

  • @DiceB
    @DiceB 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The 16 is the best no question

    • @DiceB
      @DiceB 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Agreed

  • @Eojx
    @Eojx 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I feel like anyone that is interested in getting a pair of Bred 1's should want them to look as close as possible to the original 85 pair, and that means the 2013 pair win by default, at least for me. I'll take the hit to leather quality to get a more true to the original look.

    • @otakusamsay1953
      @otakusamsay1953 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      16's are way closer to the original than the 2013's. Even down to the shade of red used. The worse thing is that they tumbled the red parts to be more like the banned 2011 release. I've owned all nike air b/red 1 releases from '85 '94 '01 '11 '13 and the '16. In terms of closeness in shape and height etc the 94's and 16's come the closest to the original.

    • @JohnnyAntonio956
      @JohnnyAntonio956 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      You right the 13 is closer to og down to the swoosh and the smooth leather, that skinny swoosh and tumbled leather fucks it up on them 16’s, the only thing the 16 has on the 13’s is height

  • @aungmyatthu_mmr
    @aungmyatthu_mmr 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    here I am in 2024, got my first ever Burned in hand and it's 2016 ver!

  • @wrozay
    @wrozay 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    2013 looks better

  • @alpaphoenix3252
    @alpaphoenix3252 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Very nice comparison. This is my first time having the bred 1s and I like the 2016 version the best.

    • @sayfulislam42
      @sayfulislam42 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I'm just still mad I didn't get a pair. Fuck!!

  • @tseringtobten8467
    @tseringtobten8467 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi gentlemen am new to shoe world , I want to buy Jorden retro 1 high og “ bred” where can I find pls help me

  • @Darth-Cosmos
    @Darth-Cosmos 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That tumbled leather though 😰

  • @Excsta
    @Excsta 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Imo the 2013 are better. Closest thing to what mj wore too and the leather is good. The 2016 skinny swoosh don't do it for me but at least the leather on them is butter.

  • @nikowang2260
    @nikowang2260 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    hope for an on feet video of banned 16

  • @thomaslee2558
    @thomaslee2558 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    2013 no glitter and better tongue

  • @lifewithahmed81
    @lifewithahmed81 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    how much are these in toronto now?? thnx

    • @SeanGo
      @SeanGo  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Probably around $500 resell?

  • @LeHaoNguyen
    @LeHaoNguyen 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    best content ever, i love it! but why only ~100k sub #__#

  • @jrssneakershow
    @jrssneakershow ปีที่แล้ว

    Which one do you like better?

  • @amosaft7060
    @amosaft7060 ปีที่แล้ว

    the swoosh on 2016 is an eye sore

  • @MathiasJohannesen
    @MathiasJohannesen 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    is the 2013 worth getting tho it seems like u bashing it :c

    • @SeanGo
      @SeanGo  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      I personally wouldn't get the 2013, quality is a lot worse

    • @JohnnyAntonio956
      @JohnnyAntonio956 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sean Go nah man 13 quality way better, if you know you know, the only thing I’d say that the 16 has over the 13 is height and that’s it.

    • @MathiasJohannesen
      @MathiasJohannesen 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JohnnyAntonio956 im dying bro I was like 11 when I commented that

    • @JohnnyAntonio956
      @JohnnyAntonio956 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mathias Johannesen 😂 a lil late then?

  • @migc7113
    @migc7113 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where can I find this in europe, I only find the patent leather bred

    • @Quan-ls3ku
      @Quan-ls3ku 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Only available on goat of flight club

  • @mikeespada6700
    @mikeespada6700 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    BEST SHOE EVER!!!

  • @dylanochoa6008
    @dylanochoa6008 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    POST NOTIFICATIONS ON

  • @FELIPE8226M
    @FELIPE8226M 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    2013 is better

  • @ronalddeguzman6379
    @ronalddeguzman6379 ปีที่แล้ว

    2013

  • @maxj8604
    @maxj8604 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for sharing.

  • @willthebeast8002
    @willthebeast8002 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent job.

  • @faresmathers
    @faresmathers 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent work !!

  • @CapitanRad
    @CapitanRad 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video! Just got a pair of 2016 Breds and they’re my first AJ1s. Amazing quality and tone of Red. Only worm them once so far. Many more to come 🙌🏾

    • @SeanGo
      @SeanGo  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Great way to start the AJ1 collection :D

    • @CapitanRad
      @CapitanRad 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sean Go hope to cop the Shadows next

    • @QuirklessJesus
      @QuirklessJesus 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I started with the shadows even though I've always wanted the Banned 2016 since they came out. I just don't have the money for the resell market lol The shadows on release day were actually within my price range so yeah

  • @TSneaks
    @TSneaks 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice pick up! I copped 2 pairs!

    • @SeanGo
      @SeanGo  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lucky guy!

  • @KrazEWillY
    @KrazEWillY 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    2016 ftw

  • @richswavy3626
    @richswavy3626 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i have 2013 version

  • @thejademonkey1
    @thejademonkey1 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    WC4 were my top release this year but i have to say got these in hand recently and they stole top slot. Beautiful shoe and great comparison vid.

    • @SeanGo
      @SeanGo  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Can't go wrong with either. Thanks!

  • @Youngmiyagi
    @Youngmiyagi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    So came here for the good knowledge as usual bcuz I saw a “good price” for a 2013 pair”. After watching this review helps me say no don’t spend the extra money on a 2013 “mid” thanks again for the gems

  • @jirenthegrey5754
    @jirenthegrey5754 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    which one do you like?
    I like 2016 how bout you

  • @derrickvang4205
    @derrickvang4205 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    2013 is a MID *wack*

  • @whateverunbox5008
    @whateverunbox5008 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is your 2013 fakes?

    • @SeanGo
      @SeanGo  7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      WHATEVER UNBOX no lol

  • @jvsting531
    @jvsting531 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love both my 2013 & 2016 pairs but the 2016 pair is a better build just wish it was the same red as the 13. Still need a pair of 85s tho 🙏🏼

    • @SeanGo
      @SeanGo  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Agreed. 2016 build with 2013 color would've been 👍🏼

  • @ryankbui
    @ryankbui 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    i can't decide which one i should get. which one would you pick bro?

    • @SeanGo
      @SeanGo  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      2016

  • @MyWifesSon69
    @MyWifesSon69 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Which ones are closer to the original that jordan played in