Is having a law enforcement apprehension dog conditioned to not escort prisoner after the bite a good idea? That's a HUGE error in the training program. In the field, during arrest with dog apprehension the dog would protect officer during suspect pat down search and hand cuffing. Then escort suspect to vehicle for transport. Dog should NEVER turn it's back to suspect. Amateur hour here folks.
Using dogs in law enforcement is not only immoral it's also not scientific. They're wrong when it comes to detecting drugs as often as they are right. That's not a good track record. As far as using them to subdue suspects, there's a strong case to be made in the US that it's unconstitutional under the 8th amendment.
Can you elaborate on this please "They're wrong when it comes to detecting drugs as often as they are right." Specifically, when the dog is as you commented "wrong". In that case when searching for a suspect there would be no "find", or if searching for contraband, firearms or explosives no "find". So, without a "find" there's no suspect or no evidence. Where does that leave things?
@@zangzang1268 best case scenario: the cop made an honest mistake when suspecting there were drugs present and called for the dog. Worst case: the cop lied and called for the dog to violate the citizen's civil rights simply to inconvenience them and to skirt the 4th and 5th amendment. It would then be up to the citizen to initiate the lengthy and expensive process of hiring a lawyer and filling a civil suit.
@@joemg323 As expected my BS alarm was on target. "Worst case" cop lies, so that makes the use of doge immoral and not scientific. Tell ya what sport. There's searching and detection, both have dogs looking for something. In what's typically termed "searching" it could be for a lost child or missing confused senior citizen. Searching could also be looking for an armed felon. Try hiding from a search dog sometime and be honest about the results... You have no clue on the topic you are attempting to advise on.
@@zangzang1268 you went off on a tangent that I wasn't even talking about and I'm the one who doesn't have a clue? LOL 🤣 there are studies that show how ineffective dogs are when used by law enforcement. Try getting the boot from out of your mouth for a minute and do some research first
Thank you for your service, officers.
Amazing❤
❤❤❤
You gotta know the language ❤
They know the difference...
Is having a law enforcement apprehension dog conditioned to not escort prisoner after the bite a good idea? That's a HUGE error in the training program. In the field, during arrest with dog apprehension the dog would protect officer during suspect pat down search and hand cuffing. Then escort suspect to vehicle for transport. Dog should NEVER turn it's back to suspect. Amateur hour here folks.
Using dogs in law enforcement is not only immoral it's also not scientific. They're wrong when it comes to detecting drugs as often as they are right. That's not a good track record. As far as using them to subdue suspects, there's a strong case to be made in the US that it's unconstitutional under the 8th amendment.
Can you elaborate on this please "They're wrong when it comes to detecting drugs as often as they are right." Specifically, when the dog is as you commented "wrong". In that case when searching for a suspect there would be no "find", or if searching for contraband, firearms or explosives no "find". So, without a "find" there's no suspect or no evidence. Where does that leave things?
@@zangzang1268 best case scenario: the cop made an honest mistake when suspecting there were drugs present and called for the dog. Worst case: the cop lied and called for the dog to violate the citizen's civil rights simply to inconvenience them and to skirt the 4th and 5th amendment. It would then be up to the citizen to initiate the lengthy and expensive process of hiring a lawyer and filling a civil suit.
@@joemg323 As expected my BS alarm was on target. "Worst case" cop lies, so that makes the use of doge immoral and not scientific.
Tell ya what sport. There's searching and detection, both have dogs looking for something. In what's typically termed "searching" it could be for a lost child or missing confused senior citizen. Searching could also be looking for an armed felon. Try hiding from a search dog sometime and be honest about the results...
You have no clue on the topic you are attempting to advise on.
@@zangzang1268 you went off on a tangent that I wasn't even talking about and I'm the one who doesn't have a clue? LOL 🤣 there are studies that show how ineffective dogs are when used by law enforcement. Try getting the boot from out of your mouth for a minute and do some research first