A couple of inaccuracies here. 1. The mono switch is for monitoring of the inputs, not the outputs. In stereo it pans input 1 to the left and input 2 to the right, for if you've plugged in a synth or game audio for example. 2. The A/B switch is for switching between outputs 1/2 and 3/4 in the headphones, not for switching between speakers at the back. To use output B you have to choose 3/4 as your outputs in software. A DJ would use output B to pre-listen to songs before playing them to the audience. A band would use it to send themselves a metronome that the audience can't hear.
Could you please tell me if activating mono switch mixes sound from my computer (DAW) to monitoring headphones to mono or would I be still be hearing stereo from computer in my monitoring headphones?
Greetings from 2020, this interface is no longer $80 USD, it is $129 USD! This has been a public service announcement from your friendly audiophile. Happy recording.
@Damian Chiliński I noticed the link goes to a different model now, the 404. I did find a couple of them on eBay and picked one up for $90 with shipping. I haven't received it yet, but am looking forward to trying it out.
Yep. Because of everyone is staying home microphones, webcams, audio interfaces, computer gaming parts, etc have sold out or have gone up in price (probably selling for MSRP instead of "street" price or straight up scalper pricing.) It's unfortunate but that is just the state of things. Pricing and stock are better now in January 2021, but I still see things OOS or selling for MSRP/scalper prices.
@@Luke-xl9cj It's actually on sale for $100. After the sale ends, it'll go back to $128.99. - www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/UMC204HD--behringer-u-phoria-umc204hd-usb-audio-interface Congrats on getting it on sale.
Man thank you so much! I’m buying my first lot of recording gear and been SOOOO overwhelmed about all the choices. Then I found your channel and I know everything I want now thanks to your videos. Goodness can’t thank you enough! You’re awesome 👊🏻
Great review, right to the point! I began with the UMC202HD then Upgraded to the UMC1820 for the 8 inputs then later tacked on the ADA8200 for 8 more via ADAT. Even though Behringer is notorious for terrible manuals they provide a good way to get into home recording at a reasonable price. TH-cam has more then enough tutorials to make up for the lousy documentation. Keep those doobliadoo reviews going!
Another great review, this almost made me jealous/worried I've just ordered a UMC22, but I think that too has an all metal chassis with the same midas preamps, so hopefully the build quality will be decent too now. Overall I'm gone for a budget starter setup and picked up the generic Knox Dynamic mic off the back of your review too, (knowing I've got a fair amount of ambient/background noise to contend with) and it is already by itself a decent step-up in quality from the simple headset mic I had been using. So with this and the knowledge I've gained from the reviews and podcasts, all I can say is thanks for all the efforts you've been putting in!
OMG this is literally me! Thank you so much Bandrew! Only thing I'm worried about is the "mix" knob which I am already used to and the UMC22 doesn't have... But as we're so close to the $100 price tag, isn't the 204HD comparable to the Scarlet Solo? Are there major differences in audio quality? :)
Hard to say since they don't provide any specs about the interface really. This does have 192kHz as opposed to the 96kHz of the scarlett. But I would probably still pick the Focusrite because based on reviews, I think it's probably more reliable. I haven't had any issued with either.
Yeah...the UMC22 is an upgraded version of the UM2 which includes a Midas preamp. However, it is limited to a sample rate of 48 kHz (as opposed to the 192 kHz of the HD interfaces). Also, it doesn't have anywhere near the compliment of i/o found on the other more expensive models. Just a stereo out for powered monitors.
After days of watching reading reviews on high sampling rate interface, my current conclusion is... 1. ZOOM UAC-2 - 24bit 192; USB 3.0, solid build, nice intuitive recording mixer with basic DSP effects. 2. BEHRINGER UMC204HD - 24BIT 192; Midas preamp, solid build, software package attractive, value for money. 3. AUDIENT ID14 - 24bit 96; pro grade preamp, solid build. Intuitive driver software. Great support and user base.
I have the UMC404, which is the same as this one with 2 extra pre-amps, and let me tell you this is built like a TANK! Paid $99 for it (had to wait almost 2 months for it), and it's by far the best audio interface for the money, hands down!
Quick heads up for anyone wanting to use this on MacOS. I had to update the drivers on this thing as it wasn't recognised by my MacBook (running on Catalina) - so had to plug it into a windows machine to do so. Once the drivers were updated I plugged it back into my Mac and everything worked as normal. Hope this helps.
I haven't yet decided on which first interface to buy, but, man, your reviews have been so helpful! Thank you so much for making these detailed videos!
The euphoria series has been great to me. The only issue I have is an issue that I doubt any interface really addresses, but I'd like to see individual channel phantom power instead of universal (not that it really makes much of a difference).
@@samnicholson5051 If you've to the trouble and expense of buying a ribbon mic, chances are you've done your homework about audio interfaces, pre-amps, and phantom power. If you can't be bothered then you shouldn't be buying ribbon mics.
For Windows 10 and Audacity, make sure Audacity is using MME, not the WASAPI windows audio interface. The error will be "Invalid sample rate" if using WASAPI. This is a software bug in WASAPI and MS will have to fix it.
I understand this is not tech support. But I've had nothing but issues with this interface. I can either get the mic to put out, or the headphone jack to work. I can never get both to work at the same time. I was on the fence on getting a new machine, but not having this interface pushed me to just do it. And even on another machine with a clean install of windows, I have the exact same issue. Please keep reviewing! You've informed me so much of my purchasing over the past year.!!!
Nogewd, use your system onboard headphone port for your headphones and use Behringer's port for direct monitoring. If you connect only one mic to one channel, you will get sound only on one side of the headphone for direct monitoring. You may need to custom-build a circuit that will make one channel play on both sides of the headphone. By the way, both onboard and Behringer headphone outputs provide 24 bit 192 KHz Studio quality playback.
Awesome review. Seems like a solid interface. I've been very happy with my mvi; no windows driver issues like a lot of these usb interfaces. That said, I'd love a yamaha AG03/06 review. ;-) I'm still contemplating getting one of those.
Hard to say since they don't provide any specs about the interface really. This does have 192kHz as opposed to the 96kHz of the scarlett. But I would probably still pick the Focusrite because based on reviews, I think it's probably more reliable. I haven't had any issued with either.
Dr-Ng'umbi Nickson Hassanally lemme ask you sonthing! On the 2i2 when u send phantom powwer u send it to both inputs so if u have a inst and a mic plugged in are u sending phantom to the instrament and dose that matter?
Definitely, check out the UMC404HD, it's the best bang for your buck in the whole UMC series, and you can do a lot with TRS outputs (not RCA), as well as 4 inputs - think stereo overheads + kick + snare. You can record a whole band with it. It also doubles as a standalone 4-channel mixer (can work without USB connection just on external power supply)
If you don't need all of the output options but need two input channels, try the UMC202HD...we got it for around $60 on Amazon and use it as a sound card for a MacBook running skype for our podcasts...I just got a compliment last night about how great our skype interviews sounded! Check it out! It's also the exact same form factor and aesthetic as this one with just usb and main outs on the back. Still has 48v phantom and everything
I was so happy to see a modded 72 Tele Reissue appear in this video, with what appear to be 7-string EMG active humbuckers? I play a 72 Tele RI with a Dimebucker in the bridge, and a JB in the neck position. (Pro tip: I removed/bypassed the tone knobs to get a little extra OOMPH out of the low end). I worked in music and pro audio for almost 20 years, and I'm VERY picky about gear reviews. I don't trust gamers or audiophiles to give me a realistic portrait of gear, because they're often not using the gear the way I would. I trust Podcastage to faithfully review gear that I don't have time to audition myself, and I know that I'm getting an honest appraisal (without negativity or trash talk), without all the "look how smart I am" bullshit that's in so many other gear reviews. I really appreciate the time and effort that goes into these vids. Thanks for putting in the work! And nice guitar.
Really appreciate the kind words. This is an older review so it's not as thorough as my more modern ones, but I'm glad you still found value in it. Happy recording Bryan!
That's a very fair point, and also why I just said to get one with Midas preamps, rather than just saying to buy the 204HD. Moreover, most youtubers could get away with not getting an HD version since their uploads will be compressed by youtube down to 48kHz or 96kHz (still can't seem to find any decent answers about this).
@@ytnoname1189 why would you need mono monitoring? is that really worth £20 more? if you're using it just for microphones you don't really need anything else more than what the 202HD already offers, especially if you're on a budget.
I'm new to recording audio and I have the UMC202HD. With the direct monitor feature on the 202 I can only hear sound on one side my headphones. One mic comes in through the left ear only and the other mic comes in through the right ear only. I believe the 204 would give me balanced sound in both ears. If anyone can clarify this issue for me it would be really, really appreciated.
@@zacjohnson452 Hi, sorry for the delay...yeah i think it's a great unit, i have it connected to my windows 10 pc with cubase 10 pro and it works great :D
Thanks for making this amazing video. I would love to know if you have the time, how the latency is on this device in ableton. Also, I want to listen to a metronome in headphones whilst having a separate out channel. Does the phones output get separated from the masteroutput in DAW ? Thanks
Seriously great video! Just picked up a Behringer UMC404HD, I assume it'll be just as awesome as this one. I was wondering if you'd be able to do a video on how to route an interface to do XLR, XLR, Google Hangout. Starting up a podcast and one host is going to be long distance. Thanks again for the great videos, you've given my friends and I the knowledge/courage to start a podcast. Thanks again!
I've been using a Blue Yeti microphone for almost 2 years now, and am looking to upgrade. I think I'm pretty much set on picking up a Rode NT1, but am still undecided on which audio interface to get. I only plan to use it for the one microphone and must have zero-latency monitoring to a standard headphone jack. I've narrowed it down to 3 interfaces: this one (the Behringer U-PHORIA UMC204HD), the Steinberg UR12, and the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (2nd gen). Which one would be the best for my situation? Thanks, and sorry for being a noob at this kind of stuff xD
Just Curious, I saw your review of the UM2 vs UMC22 and you mentioned neither unit could drive enough gain for your SM7B. Is there any improvement with this box? Thanks.
Finally got enough to order the one just below this, umc202hd, after selling my old crate BFX100 amp. Found a seller on amazon since it's been discontinued. Very excited to try it out when it arrives. Any ideas why it was discontinued?
Haha. For money? New Image, new Features (that you do not really Need), new Image... "I BUY THE NEWER ONE". . . You think the older Interfaces can not Keep pace with your recordings? But, unfortunately, Windows updates come all the time, DAWs updates come all the time and the hardware is not supported with UPDATED Drivers anymore, so you can buy from them again.
jokes, but i had huge problems with focusrite scarlett 2i4 2nd gen on windows 10, with sound in games/hi-res videos etc. and don't have any with umc404hd. such a shame for focusrite.
you should make a comparison video for interfaces with 24bit/192khz sampling capability. like this behringer or 404 version seems nice, the m-audio. scarlett, etc.
You're a fountain of misinformation, aren't you ? The Line/Inst switch is to be placed in the Instr position for a microphone, not Line (which is for a line level signal). The Stereo/Mono switch is for direct monitoring only, not to select the output mode (which is always in stereo). The playback RCA A/B jacks audio level is also controlled by the front Main Out volume knob, not just the Main Out on the back. BTW, the PAD button decreases the audio signal level by about -12db. Also, this is the only audio interface in this price range to offer Stereo/Mono switchable, zero latency monitoring. This thing blows many other overpriced audio interfaces right out of the water ! But it looks strangely similar to a certain Roland product...hmm. cdn3.volusion.com/xfjwp.bjyvq/v/vspfiles/photos/Roland_UA-55-2.jpg
@@ppsmovies To be honest, I don't know about using it under a Windows environment (with those required pesky drivers), but on my Mac it worked right out of the box, natively and flawlessly ever since. Maybe someone else who has tried it on a PC could tell you ?
@@ppsmovies Of course. Because it is essentially a sound card in an external box, powered by and using USB as the data bus. With the added benefit of XLR/quarter inch input jacks, and available Phantom power (for condenser mics), and MIDI. The only small drawback is the fact that it reduces the number of available USB ports permanently on a given PC.
Excellent reivew mate I sent one to my pal in Texas and he loves it! I almost bought one for myself but have recently acquired a MOTU M4. Great guitar riff and sound too! Is that a finished song?
Hard to say since they don't provide any specs about the interface really. This does have 192kHz as opposed to the 96kHz of the scarlett. But I would probably still pick the Focusrite because based on reviews, I think it's probably more reliable. I haven't had any issued with either.
@@Podcastage Thanks that's basically what I thought, it's a 204 minus midi and a few output ports at the back. Its good to have your opinion though. Thanks again.
Nobody seems to mention this. There's a high noise floor on the playback outputs, I have mine going to my stereo. I was able to mitigate this by using a range expander (dbx), but if I hadn't had this extra device, the Behringer would be a candidate for the circular file. If I were buying now, I would not buy this unit. I wish I had known before I spent my money.
@@Podcastage Thanks! It's called ShitTalk FM, just by the name you know what it's gonna be about. I've only got the first episode ready so far but I think it'll blow.
I know this is an older review, but I just recently picked up the UMC404HD and was blown away by how good the Midas pre-amps are. I had been using a Behringer X1204 Xenex mixer with my PR-40 plugged in along with a Cloudlifter to boost it a bit with the gain turned up pretty high for those Xenex preamps and thought it sounded great. However after using the same set-up into the 404, the gain is tuned WAY down in comparison and it sounds great. All from an interface $40-50 less than the 1204 mixer. This will probably end up replacing the Presonus 44VSL in my mobile podcasting kit
Got the UMC202HD (no MIDI and only the 6.3mm jacks for powered monitors) and a cheap multimeter to test it, and it looks like it'll give me about 45.5v (with a current of 6.8~ mA). It was a used purchase so I wanted to make sure that the phantom power worked.
5:25 You said signal not clipping, But it's clipping, you can clearly see that(and hear) by the waveform. However I really like your videos and one of the reasons that I'm buying this interface is your review.
I’ve been using the m audio delta. the NT1 tube pre amp always. On a pentium 4 that used to be xp. I run Linux on it now. I paid 350 bucks for the delta like 20 years ago. It’s audio only and does the job. Now I need something portable for just me .I just dred Usb my experience with usb was never good. But your video makes me feel a little better about it. I wish it had spdf ehhh I’ll give that plastic box a shot.
Can somebody give their opinion? Is Focusrite just charging a premium because of their brand reputation? Or do they have better pre amps or something? Comparing features and price, this seems to beat the 2i2/2i4 I've been considering.
Uh - the line/instr switch changes the input to line (nom +4dBu, max +20dBu for balanced) vs Inst Level (usually about -20 to -10dBu). Mic level is -60 to -40 dBu
There's more than a noticeable difference using one channel in mono vs two in stereo. My only issue now is trying to find a tube preamp that can run those two channel separately.
I've probably been hitting the cookie kush too much lately, I already know I'm wrong thinking I'm streaming at the full 192khz when the UMC driver can only operate at 44khz to begin with. Despite the driver being at 44khz the audio floor is MUCH better using both cables directly into the amp.
Hello Bandrew, great review. Near the end of the video a pop-up note mentions that you had some concern with the Instrument Inputs. I was hoping you could elaborate on this comment as I'm not exactly sure what you are referencing. Thank you
I'm not happy with how it captures the instruments tone. It's not very transparent. It also has the clipping sound issue I illustrated during the music test.
I just got this, I can't wait to use this now. But have a question.. What metal effect/plugin are you using on logic cuz that's what I work with. Sounds really dope.
I have bought it today and I am very frustrated. One of my worst decisions ever. The voice goes to left or right channel only not to both and the quality of voice is so terrible even worse than the usual microphone built in my laptop. Money lost in vain!
My main mixer now is a Mackie. The ProFX8usb love it. Really quiet preamps. However I did originally start out with a Behringer three(?) (I can't remember, I know it had two line level inputs and at least one quarter inch input) channel mixer with xeynx preamps. Those sucked, noisy at 45 percent with dynamics. Plus no USB out so i had to run everything to a behringer USB sound card through unbalanced RCA outs. So not cool. THIS INTERFACE THO. I may just buy one for the price alone lol. But seriously, this would be great for a simple two person podcast or basic production. If the midas pre's are as good as you suggest, this'll be a wonderful investment.
You buy all this equipment with your own money I heard you say on the better Podcast podcast show. I think thats dedication but you must have so much equipment by now :)
I find the headphones volume to be a bit weak. The Pad attenuates A LOT! Like 30dB. Personally, I find the Midas preamps to be a bit weak too. Even running a Shure SM58 through a 6 foot cable requires the gain to be up at 3 to 4 o’clock. Considering the dial stops at 5 o’clock, that doesn’t leave much headroom.
1:40 what exactly is the "pad"? Should I use my guitar with Pad on or off? 1:50 should I use my Gain near the ciipping point to get the maximum audio fidelity? Or can I use it near the minimum with no loss in audio quality? 2:08 while using guitar should I use this switch on Stereo or mono? 3:10 does the Pahntom Power change anything when I am just using guitar? 3:33 can you give me an example of external signal processor? What is the use of this? 5:32 wow niceee demonstration. My amplitube and guitarrig is sounding like trash on my behringer umc 204hd :/ Awessome review. thank you
@Nino I see, I am currently on windows 10, and I do need reliability since I won't be buying another audio interface anytime soon, So I may consider getting the UMC204HD. Also, do you happen to know the differences between UMC202HD and the UMC204HD?
@Nino hmm, I don't find a need for midi ports as of now, so I think I might go for the 202 since it's about 30$ cheaper. It has been helpful. Thanks for your input!
It all depends on the use case. If it's just me recording a single mic, it doesn't matter at all. But if I plan on recording a full drumset with 8 mics, then it is EXTREMELY important. You just need to think about what you're going to be recording, and will you be expanding in the future.
A couple of inaccuracies here.
1. The mono switch is for monitoring of the inputs, not the outputs. In stereo it pans input 1 to the left and input 2 to the right, for if you've plugged in a synth or game audio for example.
2. The A/B switch is for switching between outputs 1/2 and 3/4 in the headphones, not for switching between speakers at the back. To use output B you have to choose 3/4 as your outputs in software. A DJ would use output B to pre-listen to songs before playing them to the audience. A band would use it to send themselves a metronome that the audience can't hear.
impressive, never thought it could be used like that
Sweet, good tips!
Could you please tell me if activating mono switch mixes sound from my computer (DAW) to monitoring headphones to mono or would I be still be hearing stereo from computer in my monitoring headphones?
@@samatg I own the interface and it just puts both inputs to both sides of your headphones. The sound from your computer remains in stereo.
Anyone know how would I use this to get separate audio signals to record an interview with someone over Skype or zoom?
Greetings from 2020, this interface is no longer $80 USD, it is $129 USD! This has been a public service announcement from your friendly audiophile. Happy recording.
What happened? On Amazon the only place to buy it if selling it for almost $300!
@Damian Chiliński I noticed the link goes to a different model now, the 404. I did find a couple of them on eBay and picked one up for $90 with shipping. I haven't received it yet, but am looking forward to trying it out.
Yep. Because of everyone is staying home microphones, webcams, audio interfaces, computer gaming parts, etc have sold out or have gone up in price (probably selling for MSRP instead of "street" price or straight up scalper pricing.) It's unfortunate but that is just the state of things. Pricing and stock are better now in January 2021, but I still see things OOS or selling for MSRP/scalper prices.
It's actually $100 even on Sweetwater.com with free shipping. Got mine in three days
@@Luke-xl9cj It's actually on sale for $100. After the sale ends, it'll go back to $128.99. - www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/UMC204HD--behringer-u-phoria-umc204hd-usb-audio-interface
Congrats on getting it on sale.
Man thank you so much! I’m buying my first lot of recording gear and been SOOOO overwhelmed about all the choices. Then I found your channel and I know everything I want now thanks to your videos. Goodness can’t thank you enough! You’re awesome 👊🏻
I have this and it's been awesome for the 3 years I've been producing with it
Only thing is that it has a little latency
@@Soldier_Sean is the umc22 any good for vocals?
Keep in mind that ill distort the will to live out of the vocals so quality prob isnt a big deal
Great review, right to the point! I began with the UMC202HD then Upgraded to the UMC1820 for the 8 inputs then later tacked on the ADA8200 for 8 more via ADAT. Even though Behringer is notorious for terrible manuals they provide a good way to get into home recording at a reasonable price. TH-cam has more then enough tutorials to make up for the lousy documentation. Keep those doobliadoo reviews going!
I have this guys bigger brother UMC404HD, and I love it! the value is insane for the price
I just got a Behringer UMC202HD for $50.. so happy.. good review man
That's awesome to hear!!!
DC Welker me to bro I bought this one and everything else I need to record I'm so excited
DC Welker is it worth to buy? (202HD)
Same here! Amazing what $50 gets you!
Another great review, this almost made me jealous/worried I've just ordered a UMC22, but I think that too has an all metal chassis with the same midas preamps, so hopefully the build quality will be decent too now.
Overall I'm gone for a budget starter setup and picked up the generic Knox Dynamic mic off the back of your review too, (knowing I've got a fair amount of ambient/background noise to contend with) and it is already by itself a decent step-up in quality from the simple headset mic I had been using.
So with this and the knowledge I've gained from the reviews and podcasts, all I can say is thanks for all the efforts you've been putting in!
OMG this is literally me! Thank you so much Bandrew! Only thing I'm worried about is the "mix" knob which I am already used to and the UMC22 doesn't have...
But as we're so close to the $100 price tag, isn't the 204HD comparable to the Scarlet Solo? Are there major differences in audio quality? :)
Hard to say since they don't provide any specs about the interface really. This does have 192kHz as opposed to the 96kHz of the scarlett. But I would probably still pick the Focusrite because based on reviews, I think it's probably more reliable. I haven't had any issued with either.
Thanks for your opinion! :)
Yeah...the UMC22 is an upgraded version of the UM2 which includes a Midas preamp. However, it is limited to a sample rate of 48 kHz (as opposed to the 192 kHz of the HD interfaces). Also, it doesn't have anywhere near the compliment of i/o found on the other more expensive models. Just a stereo out for powered monitors.
After days of watching reading reviews on high sampling rate interface, my current conclusion is...
1. ZOOM UAC-2 - 24bit 192; USB 3.0, solid build, nice intuitive recording mixer with basic DSP effects.
2. BEHRINGER UMC204HD - 24BIT 192; Midas preamp, solid build, software package attractive, value for money.
3. AUDIENT ID14 - 24bit 96; pro grade preamp, solid build. Intuitive driver software. Great support and user base.
I'm from the future - January 2019 and now the price is $120 to $130. That's quite a price hike in < 2 years.
hi it's 2020 where I am and these things are $245 on Amazon. $128.99 on Sweetwater
@@ss11733 For sure Amazon sellers scalp them.
Still as cheap as it ever was in Europe
Glad it's stayed at a consistent price of around 90€ from 2019 to now in Febuary of 2021 Here in Austria
March 2021 and it is 80€
I have the UMC404, which is the same as this one with 2 extra pre-amps, and let me tell you this is built like a TANK! Paid $99 for it (had to wait almost 2 months for it), and it's by far the best audio interface for the money, hands down!
Amazon?
@@andrewwest4546 Sweetwater
@@seiph80 thanks much
@@andrewwest4546 sure! Please be aware, though, that prices have gone up!
@@seiph80 sweetwater doesn't ship to my country. Thanks though
Wow dude this thing's epic! also I love that you get 192 KHZ 24 bits quality for only $80. Way too cool. The NT1 sounded pretty good on this as well.
Yeah I really liked the sound of the NT1 through this guy.
Except is $130 now, March 2019. Bummer. They must realize what it worth.
Damn u helped me sooo much when picking interface
Thumbs up and subscribed
Right. I think i know now, wich Interface i need next... :) thanks! :)
Very happy to hear. Have fun with this!
if you bpught it , is it good still ?
Quick heads up for anyone wanting to use this on MacOS. I had to update the drivers on this thing as it wasn't recognised by my MacBook (running on Catalina) - so had to plug it into a windows machine to do so. Once the drivers were updated I plugged it back into my Mac and everything worked as normal. Hope this helps.
Thanks for the tip.
The drivers or the firmware? Two different things.
I was just looking at this on amazon, thanks for the timely review!
I have the four-channel version. Absolutely love it. I use it mostly for transferring obsolete audio formats to digital.
I sub for the stickers
Ahhhaahhahaha. Cool.
LOL!
I think I will actually get this for my Rode NT1-A. Thanks again man!
That should work well.
I use it with a rode nt2a and lemme tell ya it's awesome
spent 5 months or so trying to get the 404HD best £115 I've ever spent, they are so good for the price I think
After linking this, I saw that the 404HD was $100 in the US, and almost bought the damn thing.
but to be fair either way it's still a bargain
I haven't yet decided on which first interface to buy, but, man, your reviews have been so helpful! Thank you so much for making these detailed videos!
The euphoria series has been great to me. The only issue I have is an issue that I doubt any interface really addresses, but I'd like to see individual channel phantom power instead of universal (not that it really makes much of a difference).
It does if you're using a ribbon and condenser at the same time
@@samnicholson5051 If you've to the trouble and expense of buying a ribbon mic, chances are you've done your homework about audio interfaces, pre-amps, and phantom power. If you can't be bothered then you shouldn't be buying ribbon mics.
I appreciate you putting out these reviews! thanks bro. keep them coming.
THE STICKER WAS MY FAVORITE PART
Just got this interface and dont know how it worked until this video! Thanks man, i subbed and liked!
Thats a really good interface! Just like the focusrite, this is good for the price
I just bought this thing, literally yesterday, and boom..! Review :D
It immediately blew up? Sucks dude.
heelloooo bandrew! love your work.....
Bought it while ago after days and of researches. Best budget Audio interface.
For Windows 10 and Audacity, make sure Audacity is using MME, not the WASAPI windows audio interface. The error will be "Invalid sample rate" if using WASAPI. This is a software bug in WASAPI and MS will have to fix it.
I understand this is not tech support. But I've had nothing but issues with this interface. I can either get the mic to put out, or the headphone jack to work. I can never get both to work at the same time. I was on the fence on getting a new machine, but not having this interface pushed me to just do it. And even on another machine with a clean install of windows, I have the exact same issue.
Please keep reviewing! You've informed me so much of my purchasing over the past year.!!!
Nogewd, use your system onboard headphone port for your headphones and use Behringer's port for direct monitoring. If you connect only one mic to one channel, you will get sound only on one side of the headphone for direct monitoring. You may need to custom-build a circuit that will make one channel play on both sides of the headphone. By the way, both onboard and Behringer headphone outputs provide 24 bit 192 KHz Studio quality playback.
Would be interesting to see a comparison with Focusrite Scarlett 2i4
yap. im confused of taking scarlett / umc 202. i think focusrite scarlett is also nice, but this Behringer has a Midi Output. Hmm...
@@nanomiya790 I have both
@@culturemax234 which one is better in your opinion?
@@ripped181 I like the berinhger a little bit more
Awesome review. Seems like a solid interface.
I've been very happy with my mvi; no windows driver issues like a lot of these usb interfaces.
That said, I'd love a yamaha AG03/06 review. ;-)
I'm still contemplating getting one of those.
Well that's sucks... in my country it cost right around $150-$270
170 aud here
try ordering from Thomann!
don't have that store here in the Philippines
+Peter Wurst you are really lucky :(
but i did see one that has a decent price for 90 backs on ebay including the shipping fee :D
Just bought one today bro this things is so quiet 😃 i love it
Very nice review! Would you recommend it - sound- and noisewise - over the scarlett solo?
Greetings
-another earthling.
Hard to say since they don't provide any specs about the interface really. This does have 192kHz as opposed to the 96kHz of the scarlett. But I would probably still pick the Focusrite because based on reviews, I think it's probably more reliable. I haven't had any issued with either.
Focusrite is the best, I am using the scarlet 2i2 studio
Dr-Ng'umbi Nickson Hassanally lemme ask you sonthing! On the 2i2 when u send phantom powwer u send it to both inputs so if u have a inst and a mic plugged in are u sending phantom to the instrament and dose that matter?
Scene Records I believe it detects if a guitar is plugged in or not. I may be wrong but it should be fine.
Definitely, check out the UMC404HD, it's the best bang for your buck in the whole UMC series, and you can do a lot with TRS outputs (not RCA), as well as 4 inputs - think stereo overheads + kick + snare. You can record a whole band with it. It also doubles as a standalone 4-channel mixer (can work without USB connection just on external power supply)
If you don't need all of the output options but need two input channels, try the UMC202HD...we got it for around $60 on Amazon and use it as a sound card for a MacBook running skype for our podcasts...I just got a compliment last night about how great our skype interviews sounded! Check it out! It's also the exact same form factor and aesthetic as this one with just usb and main outs on the back. Still has 48v phantom and everything
Great input. I agree. Most people will probably be fine with the UMC202HD.
Hey, greetings from India. Could you please do a 2i2 vs umc202hd as both are budget oriented and lots of people get confused over another.
I was so happy to see a modded 72 Tele Reissue appear in this video, with what appear to be 7-string EMG active humbuckers? I play a 72 Tele RI with a Dimebucker in the bridge, and a JB in the neck position. (Pro tip: I removed/bypassed the tone knobs to get a little extra OOMPH out of the low end).
I worked in music and pro audio for almost 20 years, and I'm VERY picky about gear reviews. I don't trust gamers or audiophiles to give me a realistic portrait of gear, because they're often not using the gear the way I would. I trust Podcastage to faithfully review gear that I don't have time to audition myself, and I know that I'm getting an honest appraisal (without negativity or trash talk), without all the "look how smart I am" bullshit that's in so many other gear reviews.
I really appreciate the time and effort that goes into these vids. Thanks for putting in the work! And nice guitar.
Really appreciate the kind words. This is an older review so it's not as thorough as my more modern ones, but I'm glad you still found value in it. Happy recording Bryan!
Many people don't even need the extra that the UMC204HD has over the UMC202HD. So if you are on a tight budget get the UMC202HD
That's a very fair point, and also why I just said to get one with Midas preamps, rather than just saying to buy the 204HD. Moreover, most youtubers could get away with not getting an HD version since their uploads will be compressed by youtube down to 48kHz or 96kHz (still can't seem to find any decent answers about this).
But 192 khz give less latency
do not get the 202hd, it doesnt have mono monitoring. this guy doesnt know what he's talking about.
@@ytnoname1189 why would you need mono monitoring? is that really worth £20 more? if you're using it just for microphones you don't really need anything else more than what the 202HD already offers, especially if you're on a budget.
I'm new to recording audio and I have the UMC202HD. With the direct monitor feature on the 202 I can only hear sound on one side my headphones. One mic comes in through the left ear only and the other mic comes in through the right ear only. I believe the 204 would give me balanced sound in both ears. If anyone can clarify this issue for me it would be really, really appreciated.
I bought mine about 4 years ago and I love the thing would recommend
Like a charm
@@424omari theyre like 120 now :(
Hello May 2017, this is March 2019 calling just to say that these are now $130 on Amazon...I guess demand went up so the price followed :(
Do you know if it is still worth it or not? I am very curious
Do you know if it is still worth it or not? I am very curious
@@zacjohnson452 www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/review-and-measurements-of-topping-d10-dac.2470/ measurements in here
@@zacjohnson452 Hi, sorry for the delay...yeah i think it's a great unit, i have it connected to my windows 10 pc with cubase 10 pro and it works great :D
Super sad, couldn't afford it when it was cheaper. Now time is having me pay the price, for that!
Just watched this
Awesome metal rifs with this interface
Thanks for making this amazing video.
I would love to know if you have the time, how the latency is on this device in ableton. Also, I want to listen to a metronome in headphones whilst having a separate out channel. Does the phones output get separated from the masteroutput in DAW ? Thanks
Seriously great video! Just picked up a Behringer UMC404HD, I assume it'll be just as awesome as this one. I was wondering if you'd be able to do a video on how to route an interface to do XLR, XLR, Google Hangout. Starting up a podcast and one host is going to be long distance. Thanks again for the great videos, you've given my friends and I the knowledge/courage to start a podcast. Thanks again!
Very happy to hear that! Best of luck on the podcast! Have fun!
Did you ever figure out the mix-minus/skype or other VOIP issues?
I've been using a Blue Yeti microphone for almost 2 years now, and am looking to upgrade. I think I'm pretty much set on picking up a Rode NT1, but am still undecided on which audio interface to get. I only plan to use it for the one microphone and must have zero-latency monitoring to a standard headphone jack. I've narrowed it down to 3 interfaces: this one (the Behringer U-PHORIA UMC204HD), the Steinberg UR12, and the Focusrite Scarlett Solo (2nd gen). Which one would be the best for my situation? Thanks, and sorry for being a noob at this kind of stuff xD
I'd go with the steinberg or scarlett solo since they seem to get less complaints about equipment failure.
Awesome review bro! Thank you
Just Curious, I saw your review of the UM2 vs UMC22 and you mentioned neither unit could drive enough gain for your SM7B. Is there any improvement with this box? Thanks.
Julian Krause has a nice review on his channel that combines the two. the internal gain seems to be enough without an additional activator.
We really can see your efforts..... Tnx for making video...
Finally got enough to order the one just below this, umc202hd, after selling my old crate BFX100 amp. Found a seller on amazon since it's been discontinued. Very excited to try it out when it arrives. Any ideas why it was discontinued?
Haha. For money? New Image, new Features (that you do not really Need), new Image... "I BUY THE NEWER ONE". . . You think the older Interfaces can not Keep pace with your recordings? But, unfortunately, Windows updates come all the time, DAWs updates come all the time and the hardware is not supported with UPDATED Drivers anymore, so you can buy from them again.
Should do a comparison of this to one of the new Roland interfaces, I'd love to hear the difference
Which is better Behringer U-PHORIA UMC204HD or Steinberg UR12?
Did you already buy something? I have the UR12.
Great Review! I just bought one of these
“Works on Windows 10”
Sold.
what is advantage?
jokes, but i had huge problems with focusrite scarlett 2i4 2nd gen on windows 10, with sound in games/hi-res videos etc. and don't have any with umc404hd. such a shame for focusrite.
you should make a comparison video for interfaces with 24bit/192khz sampling capability. like this behringer or 404 version seems nice, the m-audio. scarlett, etc.
You're a fountain of misinformation, aren't you ? The Line/Inst switch is to be placed in the Instr position for a microphone, not Line (which is for a line level signal). The Stereo/Mono switch is for direct monitoring only, not to select the output mode (which is always in stereo). The playback RCA A/B jacks audio level is also controlled by the front Main Out volume knob, not just the Main Out on the back. BTW, the PAD button decreases the audio signal level by about -12db. Also, this is the only audio interface in this price range to offer Stereo/Mono switchable, zero latency monitoring.
This thing blows many other overpriced audio interfaces right out of the water ! But it looks strangely similar to a certain Roland product...hmm.
cdn3.volusion.com/xfjwp.bjyvq/v/vspfiles/photos/Roland_UA-55-2.jpg
you seem to know what you're talking about, can you use this in place of your sound card on a PC?
thanks
@@ppsmovies
To be honest, I don't know about using it under a Windows environment (with those required pesky drivers), but on my Mac it worked right out of the box, natively and flawlessly ever since. Maybe someone else who has tried it on a PC could tell you ?
But what you're saying it can be used as a sound card
@@ppsmovies
Of course. Because it is essentially a sound card in an external box, powered by and using USB as the data bus. With the added benefit of XLR/quarter inch input jacks, and available Phantom power (for condenser mics), and MIDI. The only small drawback is the fact that it reduces the number of available USB ports permanently on a given PC.
can the playback outputs send/play/reproduce(i dont know which one is correct) audio from the computer or are just for monitoring inputs?
I just got this and the at2035. glad I made good choices
Good video but I wouldn’t say obviously so much. Not everyone knows all about this, and that’s why we are here.
That does seem like a fairly nice option. Certainly usable for any normal recording projects or TH-cam or podcast things.
well but ,u using scarlett almost all the time :)) ..so i'll go with Scarlett ...
and i have scarlet 2i2 2nd gen anyway :D !!
Donny putra Is the 2i2 good for the money? I might consider getting one.
far more expensive tho ,,even for the 2i2 1st generation ...the 2i2 2nd gen its about 150usd ..while the 2i2 1stgen 120usd ...
Excellent reivew mate I sent one to my pal in Texas and he loves it! I almost bought one for myself but have recently acquired a MOTU M4. Great guitar riff and sound too! Is that a finished song?
is it better than focusrite scarlet solo?
Hard to say since they don't provide any specs about the interface really. This does have 192kHz as opposed to the 96kHz of the scarlett. But I would probably still pick the Focusrite because based on reviews, I think it's probably more reliable. I haven't had any issued with either.
ok!! thnx
Focusrite is the best, I am using the scarlet 2i2 studio
Dr-Ng'umbi Nickson Hassanally got it! i am also in favour of focusrite... i am not able to make my mind for this
Focusrite is the best my friend, I have not used the behringer and I am not the sound guy but my experience with 2i2 is enough to say
Really enjoy your reviews, probably the best ones I've seen on yt. Was hoping you have or are going to do a review of the UMC 202hd?
The UMC202HD should be the exact same as the 204HD, but without a few features.
@@Podcastage Thanks that's basically what I thought, it's a 204 minus midi and a few output ports at the back. Its good to have your opinion though. Thanks again.
Nobody seems to mention this. There's a high noise floor on the playback outputs, I have mine going to my stereo. I was able to mitigate this by using a range expander (dbx), but if I hadn't had this extra device, the Behringer would be a candidate for the circular file. If I were buying now, I would not buy this unit. I wish I had known before I spent my money.
Thank you for made this cool review video! I like your way haha. Greeting from Thailand!
Super informative video. Thanks a bunch, you've basically got me sorted to start a podcast. Thanks! ;)
That's amazing. Super happy to hear that. Best of luck on the podcast!
@@Podcastage Thanks! It's called ShitTalk FM, just by the name you know what it's gonna be about. I've only got the first episode ready so far but I think it'll blow.
Thanks, very nice presentation. I enjoyed by the scene when you through back empty box.
Great interface, I have the UMC 202HD model which is basically the same as the 204HD but without the midi connectors.
Does it have a lot on noise with mic? Gonna use with old sm58.
@@avia4281 it was very quiet while it lasted but now I use a native instruments interface which is way better!
I know this is an older review, but I just recently picked up the UMC404HD and was blown away by how good the Midas pre-amps are. I had been using a Behringer X1204 Xenex mixer with my PR-40 plugged in along with a Cloudlifter to boost it a bit with the gain turned up pretty high for those Xenex preamps and thought it sounded great. However after using the same set-up into the 404, the gain is tuned WAY down in comparison and it sounds great. All from an interface $40-50 less than the 1204 mixer. This will probably end up replacing the Presonus 44VSL in my mobile podcasting kit
Got the UMC202HD (no MIDI and only the 6.3mm jacks for powered monitors) and a cheap multimeter to test it, and it looks like it'll give me about 45.5v (with a current of 6.8~ mA). It was a used purchase so I wanted to make sure that the phantom power worked.
hows it now? still good?
These are a great bang for your buck alternative to the much more expensive Focusrite interfaces.
mi lo sono domandato anch'io a che serve il adesivo , e la documentazione è scarsa ...ma la scheda audio è ottima!!! bravissimo bel video!!!!
5:25 You said signal not clipping, But it's clipping, you can clearly see that(and hear) by the waveform. However I really like your videos and one of the reasons that I'm buying this interface is your review.
I’ve been using the m audio delta. the NT1 tube pre amp always. On a pentium 4 that used to be xp. I run Linux on it now. I paid 350 bucks for the delta like 20 years ago. It’s audio only and does the job. Now I need something portable for just me .I just dred Usb my experience with usb was never good. But your video makes me feel a little better about it. I wish it had spdf ehhh I’ll give that plastic box a shot.
Super cool, thx a lot.
Thanks
I just subscribed.
Can somebody give their opinion? Is Focusrite just charging a premium because of their brand reputation? Or do they have better pre amps or something? Comparing features and price, this seems to beat the 2i2/2i4 I've been considering.
would this be good stand-alone with a dynamic mic, or would you recommend adding cloudlift? (and thanks for all your vids...you do a real service)
Depends on the mic.. Talking generic dynamic is a bit broad.. I used this interface with a Rode Procaster with no issues in gain stage at all.
@@blazemonger1 Gotcha. Thanks for the feedback.
My dude be flexing them guitar skills haha
Nice review and demo! Is there any noticeable latency when playing with amp sims through speakers?
man that short song was cool!!!
Uh - the line/instr switch changes the input to line (nom +4dBu, max +20dBu for balanced) vs Inst Level (usually about -20 to -10dBu).
Mic level is -60 to -40 dBu
The stereo / mono button is a mixdown for the two xlr inputs, I use it with a blue yeti pro so I can have that yummy stereo 192khz.
yung packin doesn't the yeti pro have 192kHz option on the built in USB interface?
There's more than a noticeable difference using one channel in mono vs two in stereo. My only issue now is trying to find a tube preamp that can run those two channel separately.
I've probably been hitting the cookie kush too much lately, I already know I'm wrong thinking I'm streaming at the full 192khz when the UMC driver can only operate at 44khz to begin with. Despite the driver being at 44khz the audio floor is MUCH better using both cables directly into the amp.
Hello Bandrew, great review. Near the end of the video a pop-up note mentions that you had some concern with the Instrument Inputs. I was hoping you could elaborate on this comment as I'm not exactly sure what you are referencing. Thank you
I'm not happy with how it captures the instruments tone. It's not very transparent. It also has the clipping sound issue I illustrated during the music test.
I just got this, I can't wait to use this now. But have a question.. What metal effect/plugin are you using on logic cuz that's what I work with. Sounds really dope.
Can it run a 250ohm or 600ohm headphones ?
I have bought it today and I am very frustrated. One of my worst decisions ever. The voice goes to left or right channel only not to both and the quality of voice is so terrible even worse than the usual microphone built in my laptop. Money lost in vain!
By the way I believe the pad offers -15db
Great info
My main mixer now is a Mackie. The ProFX8usb love it. Really quiet preamps. However I did originally start out with a Behringer three(?) (I can't remember, I know it had two line level inputs and at least one quarter inch input) channel mixer with xeynx preamps. Those sucked, noisy at 45 percent with dynamics. Plus no USB out so i had to run everything to a behringer USB sound card through unbalanced RCA outs. So not cool. THIS INTERFACE THO. I may just buy one for the price alone lol. But seriously, this would be great for a simple two person podcast or basic production. If the midas pre's are as good as you suggest, this'll be a wonderful investment.
I feel like I'm never going to buy this but it's fun to watch anyway :D
Not to mention not understanding a word he's saying :D
6.3mm input technically named TRS. Use it, Luke! :)
You buy all this equipment with your own money I heard you say on the better Podcast podcast show. I think thats dedication but you must have so much equipment by now :)
Can i use it for live performance ? I need the daw for autotune and 1/2 for main and 3/4 for custom mix on In Ear Monooring. Will it work ?
I find the headphones volume to be a bit weak.
The Pad attenuates A LOT! Like 30dB.
Personally, I find the Midas preamps to be a bit weak too. Even running a Shure SM58 through a 6 foot cable requires the gain to be up at 3 to 4 o’clock. Considering the dial stops at 5 o’clock, that doesn’t leave much headroom.
Which is better for live streaming? According to ur review i like yamaha ag 03 too. But budget is different
Holy hell, that little jam was the shit!
1:40 what exactly is the "pad"? Should I use my guitar with Pad on or off?
1:50 should I use my Gain near the ciipping point to get the maximum audio fidelity? Or can I use it near the minimum with no loss in audio quality?
2:08 while using guitar should I use this switch on Stereo or mono?
3:10 does the Pahntom Power change anything when I am just using guitar?
3:33 can you give me an example of external signal processor? What is the use of this?
5:32 wow niceee demonstration. My amplitube and guitarrig is sounding like trash on my behringer umc 204hd :/
Awessome review. thank you
Köszönjük!
You are too kind Sityuka. Thank you so much.
Should I go with this, or should I go straight for the Scarlett 2i2? I do have the budget for the Scarlett 2i2.
I'm sure there will be a video comparing both soon. Wait for it :)
@Nino I see, I am currently on windows 10, and I do need reliability since I won't be buying another audio interface anytime soon, So I may consider getting the UMC204HD. Also, do you happen to know the differences between UMC202HD and the UMC204HD?
@Nino hmm, I don't find a need for midi ports as of now, so I think I might go for the 202 since it's about 30$ cheaper. It has been helpful. Thanks for your input!
Nice video! How valuable do you believe the separate inserts are when comparing different interfaces?
It all depends on the use case. If it's just me recording a single mic, it doesn't matter at all. But if I plan on recording a full drumset with 8 mics, then it is EXTREMELY important. You just need to think about what you're going to be recording, and will you be expanding in the future.