Electric Vehicles: Will they save or destroy us?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 มิ.ย. 2024
- Go to ground.news/sabine to stay fully informed on breaking news, compare coverage and avoid media bias. Sign up or subscribe through my link for 30% OFF unlimited access if you support the mission and find it as useful as I do.
Transportation is a major contributor to greenhouse-gas emissions. Will electric vehicles be the key to stopping climate change or will they wreck the electrical grid? What are the major issues and drawbacks of electric vehicles? For this video, we have collected all you need to know for the ongoing transition to electric vehicles.
Many thanks to Jordi Busqué for helping with this video jordibusque.com/
💌 Support us on Donatebox ➜ donorbox.org/swtg
🤓 Transcripts and written news on Substack ➜ sciencewtg.substack.com/
👉 Transcript with links to references on Patreon ➜ / sabine
📩 Sign up for my weekly science newsletter. It's free! ➜ sabinehossenfelder.com/newsle...
🔗 Join this channel to get access to perks ➜
/ @sabinehossenfelder
🖼️ On instagram ➜ / sciencewtg
00:00 Introduction
00:55 Current Situation
04:32 Regulations
05:17 Charging Availability
10:16 Grid Issues
13:39 Carbon Footprint
15:37 Production
16:27 Raw Materials
19:49 Human Resources
21:25 Summary
22:15 A Better Way for Reading News
#science #environment - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
![[TH] VCT Masters Shanghai Playoffs DAY 2 // PRX vs G2 | EDG vs TH](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/T5j2XVcDFs0/mqdefault.jpg)
As several of you pointed out, our video on electric vehicles which ran last week contained several mistakes and omissions. I was very unhappy about this and decided to revise and reupload it. Thank you all for your feedback, I really appreciate it.
Can we please have a bullet point list of correction for those who don't want to watch it again?
Enjoying the jokes just as much the second time. 😊
❤❤❤
Thank you my dear lady for your consideration for us.
@@thearpox7873 No! 🤣🤣🤣
Full credit for owning any mistake and improving the final product. This is why I will keep watching you.
Just found and why i subscribed
Kudos for acknowledging the mistakes! Takes a pair to pull off!
Given the climate I live in and huge distances involved in routine trips, EV will never be an option here simply from survival standpoint.
I often have to park off the road during blizzard and wait the blizzard out inside the car (with the engine off - obviously - i have layers to survive -40 'F inside the car just fine). With the gasoline car, I know that I can simply wait it out, sleep in the car and survive.
Try to take a wild guess how long will the EV battery last at -40 'F/ - 40'C and whether the car will start after , say, 8-10 hours out in the elements (full exposure to wind-chills down to -60 'F), especially after having driven 200-300 kms already, but if someone's aspiration is to win a Darwin's Award, hey - no judgement there :)
That being said, EV could be a nice, fourth (not second, not third) summer car. I can see it could be used for about 3-4 months out of a year, probably 2, perhaps even 3 times per week for things like - getting an ice cream, picking up mail or visiting neighbors across the street :)
On a second thought, for $80,000, I can probably imagine a nicer summer car than a typical fugly EV...
I haven't finished the video yet, but personally, I don't like how she seems to talk about the amounts of money needed for EV transitioning as if it's a fool's errand.
As if that's waaayyy beyond what's reasonable for a country's expenditure.
It makes it sound defeatist which isn't the kind of message we need.
@@VladR1024 EV batteries don't technically lose charge in the cold. You just can't get the energy out till they are warm again. (Which in your case would be a problem, I agree)
But sodium batteries are coming and they work with close to 100% efficiency up to -20°C. Even at -40°C I'd expect them to work decently well, but time will have to tell there.
Does your combustion car even start at that temperatures? Don't they need a block heater at that point?
Before somebody asks why the range is worse in winter then: heating, winter tires and worse road conditions.
@@VladR1024 what cars are you looking at that $80.000 is your go-to? There are so many, so much cheaper EVs.
Hi Sabine, your mind set for AC home charging is based on combustion engine fuel tank refills. You go to the service station when your fuel tank is low.
With an electric vehicle you top-up charge every time you drive into your car port or garage. On average most daily distance covered by a vehicle is less the 50km. This would require approximately 4 to 6 kwh of charging energy. With a 15 amp AC socket this will take approximately 2 hours or less. If you have solar and charge during the day the cost to do so will be small or nearly free.
It's great having control of your own electric fuel supply at home. Will never go back to ICE vehicle.
I fully agree on the fuel tank refill analogy @henvan8737, several times during the video I found you, Sabine, try to apply "old-style" (i.e. petrol/energy) mindset one to one to BEVs.
Another example is peak loads for the grid (transformers). This assumes energy generation and distribution will remain forever centralized, but we already see a disruption there happening right now due tue exponentially growth of renewable energies. So, yes the grid needs to change and become more flexible but mainly due to renewables and not BEV.
And again, this is already happening. There are smart home chargers on the market which charge your car whenever there is cheap electricity (and low load to the grid).
Also, every BEV and home owner will add solar to the roof, for purely economic reasons, thus effectively reducing load to grid.
Not to mention vehicle to grid which you can already buy in some countries (e.g. in Germany: Volkswagen - E3DC)
All of that (and more to come) is reducing load to grid and is part of a transformation, that is happening anyway due to solar+wind even if no BEV would exist on earth...
As a new EV owner, I was warned against daily charging. There is a limit to the number of times a battery can be charged. Topping off your EV battery is similar to keeping your phone or laptop always plugged in. It reduces the life span of the battery. I was told to use the battery for what it was intended. I drive my EV down to a charge level where the remaining distance is at or below 50 miles, unless I plan to drive a considerable distance. Then I charge it up to 80% to ensure I can make it back home.
@@lawrenceemke1866that's why most ev top up to 80% , 60% to 80% top up will not degrade your battery
@@lawrenceemke1866 yes it treu if lithium batteries are kept full they eat away at the catode best is to put it in staorage charge i think 3.7 volts per cell with the ev batteries but you want to have it full so when you want to drive you can go even having youre battery at at full for a week will damage it.i know this from drone racing and using lithium batteries we would store them at storage charge so they will keep there punch if you did not do that the batteries would get weak very quickly
@@jbcola74 yes it will if you want to store the ev you need to put it in storage charge but there is no option for that and fast chasrging will damage it to yes it can do it but if you charge slow the battery will last longer
Biphase in the US. Every house has 240V coming in, and it's split into 120V. You just need to run a 240 circuit to your driveway for the charger (it cost us about $900, but 30% was a direct federal income tax deduction).
The problem is apartment buildings that don't have parking.
CARB liers about the efficiency of EVs. In their ARB/MSD/7---94 they claim that battery efficiency is 80% and motor is 90%. These are LIES!!!! Charging a battery in one hour is 5.88% efficient, in 15 minutes it is only 0.3675%. The motor depends on how many stops it makes. Ech time it starts the motor and system efficiency is almost ZERO!!!!
Sorry for being a week late with this comment.
Thank you for taking pride in your work. Too many youtubers don't look back to correct their content. I appreciate all of your videos. I love the humor and the density of accurate scientific information.
Well said.
😊😊😊😊
Hi Sabine! I've been driving my Tesla Model Y since June of 2021 and my experience has been as follows:
- I never think about going to a gas station. No more calculating if I should stop at a gas station before or after my next destination (or wait until tomorrow). Just plug in at night and forget about it.
- No more standing outside in the wind, rain and cold to fill up the tank.
- On the rare occasion I do need to use a Supercharger, just plug right in. No swiping your credit card as the charger knows who you are and knows how to bill you.
- Driving is tireless as I rarely need to use the brake. Letting off the accelerator automatically switches to regenerative braking which slows the car to a stop. No more switching your foot back and forth in slow traffic.
- Tesla service staff comes to my house for certain service calls. Recalls have been handled via over-the-air software updates (thus far)
- Charging costs less than half the equivalent gasoline (according to the app). Easy to configure off-peak charging.
Well done, Sabine. You managed to discuss electric vehicles without mentioning the shortcomings of the currently dominant EV power source, namely lithium-ion batteries. Leaving aside the whole raw materials issue and the fact that Rio Tinto, the world's largest mining company, said at a recent industry conference that there simply isn't enough lithium in existence to meet demand, there's the issue of the chemistry.
While the dangers of Li-Ion may very well have been overstated, the fact is that they have very real consequences on the motor trade. Among them:
The escalating severe depreciation of EVs that can now be measured on a weekly basis;
the scrapping of battery packs with only superficial damage to the outer casing (which usually means writing off the entire vehicle because of the cost of replacement);
the refusal of used car dealers to take them as trade-in or to buy them at auction;
the increasing reluctance of insurance companies to insure them and steeply rising premiums for everyone, EV owner or not;
the inability of local mechanics to repair them because, amongst other things, manufacturers (especially Tesla) refuse to supply them with parts because they are not authorised repairers; and
the increasing unwillingness of body shops to take in crashed EVs because of the danger that a damaged battery pack will ignite and burn everything to the ground.
Note that I haven't even mentioned all the problems with battery disposal at end of life. As things stand, spent Li-Ion batteries go straight to landfill because they cannot be recycled and that means that they will be oozing toxic chemicals into the land and water for decades if not centuries to come.
Battery electric vehicles are an environmental disaster in the making. In fact, it's already happening in China. Maybe in the near future solid state batteries will arrive to save the day but right now what you have is a bunch of scientifically illiterate politicians pushing a suicidal agenda that will do lasting environmental harm down our throat for the purpose of establishing their green credentials.
Well put, it's nice to see a voice of criticism during this, what some would call, mass schizophrenia event. 😢
I would add another point, regarding safety.
In case of accident, or catastrophic battery failure one is dealing with a fire that is hard to extinguish.
Since battery burns independently from oxygen supply, conventional methods and extinguishers are u effective. Fire itself is a chemical reaction that will run its course for anywhere of up to 36 hours.
As we already know, although rare, spontaneous ignition of a lithium based batteries happen. Imagine one of such EV, being parked in the underground parking of apartment building.
That just might be a reason to insurance companies behind reluctant about EV.
Recycling of batteries is a big issue that no one wants to talk about. Public is well attuned and oposes nuclear waste storages while turning the head other way when we have similar r problem but on much bigger scale with all renewables.
In fact recycling is the biggest problem of all renewables. Recycling is a daunting, ridiculously expensive and notoriously not included in energy cost forecasts. Why? Because then they would be totally unappealing solution, as EV are now. Same goes for solar panel and wind turbines on a smaller scale.
In general all prognosis seem to be well to optimistic, loke not even taking demographic decline as factor in near future.
This obviously not popular opinion in the doctrine of climate change.
Don't get me wrong, let's get off fossil fuels but in a sensible, not a reckless way.
Imho, by the way and means of introduction, lack of sensible debate and exercise in scaremongering, whole industry smell fishy to say the least.
We have been driving a Chevy Volt for 6 years. 90% of our charging is at home. Often you don’t use 100% of the power and don’t need to charge every night. And the big omission in the revised version is the cost savings of routine repairs. In six years: no brake pads replaced, no electric motor adjustments, no battery maintenance! Sure, replacing the whole battery would be expensive, but that is more like replacing an internal combustion engine rather than a gas tank. It happens, but very rarely. In my experience, the vast majority of EV drivers would never go back to the high cost of gas and routine maintenance. Thanks for asking for input Sabine. Your integrity is showing. 😊
Generaly, I agree with this article except the notion on brake pads: less used brakes will rust away quickly, so they will need to be replaced. Some EV manufacturers use good old drum brakes…
I turned my bicycle into an electric bike. It weighs less than 30 pounds, has a top speed of 22 mph, and a range of 25 miles. With another six pounds of battery, the range doubles to about 55 miles.
I bet its fun trying to get several bags of groceries home with that.
@@michaelfried3123 With proper panniers, no problem. I do that for some years now.
@@michaelfried3123I have a trailer on one bike.. holds loads
@@1puppetbike I'd be too afraid of a car smashing into me where I live to use it as a grocery getter. Sadly.
Woah how did you do that??!!!
I'm glad you pulled the other video, it had a huge number of serious mistakes in it. This one is much better. I'll make some additions, simple things that people can remember:
* A good rule of thumb for passenger-vehicle EV power consumption is 3 miles per 1 kWh. Tesla's get closer to 4, but 3 is a good conservative rule of thumb). From this it is easy to determine how much electrical energy is required, since statistics on miles driven are readily available and each individual has a pretty good idea how much they drive.
* So in terms of charging at home, the charge rate you need for convenience depends entirely on the above. If you drive the average round-trip commute of 40 miles a day, you need (40 / 3) = 13 kWh worth of charging each day. At a space-heater rate of 1000W (1kW) this would take 13 hours with an L1 charger. With a L2 charger set to 16A it would be (16A x 240VACrms = 3.84 kW, so (13 / 3.84) = 3.4 hours. At 35A, even less time.
For home charging, thus, it comes down to what is convenient for the consumer. A good rule of thumb is "overnight charging". L2 chargers are more convenient but to be very explicit here there is no need to charge at 35A. You can easily charge at 16A or even 8A or whatever, so being circuit-limited is not that big a deal. And if it came down to it, you could charge from a normal consumer outlet (120VACrms in the U.S., 12A = 1.4kW, or (13 / 1.4) = 9 hours to charge 40 miles.
* This determines, more or less, how dependent on fast DC charging one is. If you have no outlets at all, say you park on the street and can't string an extension cable without someone getting angry at you, or if you drive a lot but can't get L2 charging, or if you are driving long distance all in one go, such as when taking a trip, then you need to use a fast DC charger for at least part of your trip.
Most people do NOT need to use a fast DC charger for nominal work commutes. Not to mention that there is also such a thing as "destination charging" which is typically built-out by businesses that more and more EV commuters will be able to use over time.
* This means that Fast DC charging is really only necessary for longer trips. There does need to be a build-out, and Europe is way ahead of the U.S. on that, but it isn't really a show-stopper. That is, there will be push and pull just like any other build-out, but it is not necessarily something that needs to be 100% government funded. Demand creates supply creates demand.
--
This time around you made only two significant mistakes worth noting:
(1) The first was confusing what parts of the grid have to be upgraded. To be clear, the ENTIRE EV rollout can occur with only minimal distribution-side upgrades and, in fact, no home services need to be upgraded. Sure, it might be convenient for some home owners to upgrade, but it is absolutely not a requirement for any home. The serious upgrading of the grid has to occur on the generation side because the renewables generation expansion is "a larger number of smaller generators" and those generators need feeders and backbones. That's 99% of the problem.
Feeding residential power back to the grid does NOT require distribution line or transformer upgrades because backfeeds are limited to 20% of the service size anyway, which is less than peak consumption.
But it MAY require a substation transformer upgrade... mostly the reason for this is to upgrade to a transformer with better voltage regulation automation. substations transformers have various taps that the substation can switch them between to change the voltage ratio of the transformer. When feeding power in the reverse direction, the voltage is being scaled up rather than scaled down and if a large subdivision is pushing a lot of power it is generally doing so near the top of the allowed voltage range. Which means that the step-up in the reverse direction can sometimes exceed the substation's intermediate voltage rating. Hence the need to upgrade that particular transformer.
Distribution (e.g. pole) transformer upgrading is only a function of potential peak charging rates which for EVs can be significant, except that there is no actual requirement that an EV be charged at 35A. It can just as easily be charged at 8A or 12A or 16A, for example, which are far less stressful on distribution transformers. So is it actually a show-stopper? No. Just a convenience. The utility can simply require that homes with un-upgraded equipment charge at a slower rate until such a time as the equipment can be upgraded. That's it.
That's the technical explanation. But it should be noted that substation upgrades are only required piecemeal. The entire substations / all substations do NOT need to be upgraded because neighborhoods just don't all upgrade to solar, let alone reverse EV feeding, overnight.
The quoted dollar amounts or spectacularly over-estimated and completely ignore the dynamics of the rollout and adoption of EVs as well as the 30+ year time-frame involved. When you divide it all out, it really isn't as much money as people think it is.
(2) You, like a lot of people, greatly misunderstand the power of industrial scale in production when it comes to the cost of building an EV. This is the primary mover. You also are still a bit behind on understanding battery chemistries. Cobalt and Nickel are used in NMC and NCA chemistries, but are NOT required in LFP chemistries (you mention LFP later but you clearly got lost on the significance). So neither Cobalt or Nickel are show-stoppers. Lithium is a very abundant element all over the world that requires only the mining to be scaled up. That is happening. Just because there is some push and pull doesn't mean that it's actually any sort of problem that would stick with us.
You mention LFP, but you are a bit behind on the chemistry. Adding manganese (LFMP, for example), and other similar adjustments, has brought the energy density up to near the same levels of lithium ternary batteries (typically NMC) and this is clearly where the market is headed.
Sodium batteries are NOT in scaled, volume production yet. LFP batteries are. Sodium batteries are a bit behind on the technology scale but they could very easily grow into a competitive alternative.
==
That's everything in a nutshell. You did a much better job this time around. Just remember that the technology is progressing VERY quickly, which means that you have to keep up with it at the same pace.
Thanks so much. One additional comment, not aimed at our dear Sabine in particular. Many alarmist EV discussions are "Oh my, EV' transition is such a huge problem, where will we possibly get XYZ materials!!"
They completely leave out the alternatives. The growing demand in developing countries for more and more transport, in addition to more developed countries replacements. Without EVs, the world could not meet the much greater XYZ material demands and inefficiencies with ICE transport. EV's are already getting much more recyclable, for example. Fewer parts. Less pollution in use. Less pipeline and refining buildouts. Less oil spills. Fewer tanker trucks on our roads. Less sea bed drilling blowouts. Etc.
The past and future environmental devastation caused by fossil fuel use MUST be included in any critical discussion of EVs.
The dollar amount of the upgrade to the grid is also overestimated because that upgrade is INSTEAD of normal upgrade that would have been done in any case during those same 30 years. The needed upgrade might cost more, but it's not all ADDITIONAL costs.
But I can understand why estimating that is more difficult (it also depend on how much investment in grid maintenance is done by different utilities and that is very different in different countries)
I thought the main problem with Lithium supply was all the water it uses in the pools, Matt Ferrell (@UndecidedMF) did a video about companies trying to extract it in different ways but it didn't sound like they were near commercialisation yet.
I agree about the grid, there is a lot of alarmist reporting out there, normally from media with big fossil fuel sponsors. 🙄
There are bound to be areas where the infrastructure has been ignored for too long and will need substantial investment, then there are areas which are already ready. I can't afford Patreon so I don't have access to the references, I was wondering how much charge was needed for each vehicle in the estimations at 10:20, not a question for you but something I wondered while listening.
I didn't think many people drive further, every day, than a standard power plug can provide overnight, assuming people plug in when they get home and not the moment before they fall asleep. I think most of us spend more than 8-9 hours at home before leaving again.
If they can get a V2G standard widely adopted they should be able to use the "smarts" to distribute the load around so nothing gets exceeded and everyone has enough charge for the next day. Of course this will require people to think ahead and set how much charge they'll need for days they'll travel more than usual, so it's probably headed to massive online and talkback radio bitching!
I'm very bullish on sodium-ion batteries.
They probably won't be in long range cars anytime soon or ever, as they are competitive with LFP and some day maybe even with NMC in Wh/kg, but not Wh/l.
But I think they will be in all low to mid range cars at some point. They just have amazing properties compared to existing lithium-ion batteries.
While they are in mass production now, it's not at a big scale yet, that is for sure.
CATL is very clear that current lithium-ion battery factories can be easily converted, but that is of course only half of the story. The materials used are completely different. So building up supply chains could take years. But let's hope it goes a bit quicker than that.
@@Cluuey the water that is used up in lithium mining is brine from salt lakes in which nothing can survive and that can be used for nothing else. Compared to mining other metals lithium is basically planting trees to grow back the rain forest or something like that.
There are people saying that it magically makes fresh water disappear, but that doesn't make any sense. It's more likely that that is due to the big cattle herds in the area. If tens of thousands of cows are drinking water in a desert for decades, at some point there won't be any water left. Where is it supposed to come from? Rain? It's a desert.
From many perspectives an excellent presentation of the situation, but Sabine! You once again omitted an extremely important point! Cars, electric or otherwise, are designed for things they are statistically never used for. Cars are driven short (
It's better to have the ability to travel long distances when you need to. I can tell you I would never buy one that is slow with less range than what I have. You can produce it but it's doubtful many would buy it.
Great review Sabina. I am basically an environmental petrol head! Our home is now fully self sufficient for power water and outputs. We are actually on our second complete solar system. Technical efficiency has improved dramatically over the last 18 years and costs fallen dramatically. Our new battery hybrid 8.6kw system cost less than our original 2kw system! Everyone said back in 2009 when bought our Prius ITech that the batteries wouldnt last that it wasnt viable etc but the main batteries are still original and operating to specification. The only thing replaced was the inverter in 2022. So full EVs will be both better and worse than people expect IMO. There will always be a fundemental issue where mass is involved. For hauling loads long distance EVs cannot compete with efficiency of the modern Turbo Diesel. And so people are going to be faced with transformative change. Travelling long distances hauling caravans or trailers will be much more difficult. When you consider that the most popular new vehicle in Australia and the USA is 4wd SUV utility many are going to find change difficult.
"For hauling loads long distance EVs cannot compete with efficiency of the modern Turbo Diesel. " I agree ! I bought a diesel car precisely for that reason. But that is only for a transition period. New battery technology will be mass produced end 2023-2024 (CATL & BYD) with a range of 750 miles/1000Km and charging from 10% to 80% in 15 minutes. The technology is improving fast, and mass production takes less than 2 years now. So I bought my diesel car because my old diesel is not allowed to drive in the city due to political "environmental" reasons. I therefore needed a solutiion until 2027-2028 when the EV with a longer range faster charging batteries will be available, and affordable.
I used to agree with you about trucks, but check out Tesla big trucks that Pepsi is using wow!
Electric trucks are the way to go.
My current electric vehicle has a 500km range & is brilliant at towing trailers. The penalty on range is about 30% which still makes it economical!
They won't find change difficult because they won't change. Large countries with vast swaths of land like US or Australia or Russia will simply continue using fossil fuel cars until maybe hydrogen becomes trendy
One is reminded of the old question "When is the best time to plant a tree?" Answer - "Fifty years ago! The second best time? Now!"
Great that Sabine is willing to update the video with fixes. Is there a list of corrections?
Never make a list of your mistakes and let anyone see it.
@@bugsbunny8691 why?
I was looking for such a list. It's easy to miss important corrections, and you may be left with a mistaken idea because it wasn't explicitly pointed out.
quite a few corrections, but still many more needed.
@@hcubicsuch as?
Dear Sabine, thank you for all your interesting videos. YES, I'm driving an full E-vehicle, and that fact came in my life with different other events, all of them making sense together. First of all; I bought this car when I was 67, and liberated from professional pressure (I'm not sure it would have been possible if I was 40). Second point: I finally became strongly conviced about climat change and the absolute need of decarbonizing our lives. What means: accepting change, accepting reduction of expenses, reduction of consumption. What means: reduction of mobility. I don't fly anymore, I stopped eating beef, and try to convince my neighbours and family about reduction of green house gasses emissions, what is a sometimes a painfull challenge. So, I bought a LITTLE e-vehicle (Opel Corsa). I therefore abandonned my dream of driving a beautifull Volvo XC40 (abandonning dreams is also challenging). I charge aat homs, at night, and don't drive mors than 200 km/day. Living in Belgium, a little country where everithing is close to you, makes that not too difficult. For longer distances, I stop using the car and take the train. Decarbonizing our lives is an absolute piority!!!
BALONEY. FOOL
There needs to be more people like him@@NineInchTyrone
Well mate I live in rural Australia and am now 77 years old and on a limited income like many others plus this also include those on a low income - unlike I suspect you might not be and simply could never afford to own an EV even if we wanted to which I might add I will not do under any circumstances. Even if I did the infrastructure for charging out here is simply not there and the distances we have to travel are far greater than you do in Belgium. This push for carbon reduction is in my mind at least 30-40 years too late something should have been done about it way back then. I will admit that there were stricter regulations put on ICE vehicles back then but ti sems to have sputtered to a halt right now and should be further investigated.
Fast charging wastes most of the electricity and will INCREASE pollution!!!!
Sabine, there are a few points you missed I'd add but I'll mention just one. "Range Anxiety" has become rather a media trope and, 6yrs in on my 2nd EV, you get to know your range pretty quickly in different conditions - hot, cold, wet or windy. "Charger Anxiety" is a more accurate description, knowing whether the units at the next stop will work or have a queue when on a longer trip. Of course a Tesla heading to the Tesla network has this mostly sorted. Larger charging hubs more closely spaced will eventually solve all but the busiest of times.
Range or Charge. same difference. ps who needs more anxiety in their lives?
Fast charging wastes most of the electricity! charging in pone hour is 5.88% efficient. In 15minutes it is only 0.3675%!!! Check out Joule's law!!!
THIS is why I appreciate your channel, you updated a video based on your current understanding of the topic.
IF everyone did this, it'd make things a lot simpler.
That's how science should work. Unfortunately, this process is hindered by commercial pressure. Thank you Sabine for doing science the proper way
@@jurjenbos228 There are plenty of inaccuracies, the fact that many people think this as an accurate presentation makes me lose faith in humanity.🤒
Your videos are so great. I drive an EV, Volkswagen, and live in a cold climate. The most difficult thing that I didn’t anticipate when making the choice of which car to get was the significant, almost 40%, reduction in range when the temperatures are cold. It makes the effective range considerably lower than advertised for almost half of the year.
@@Justanotherhumanonthenet heating isn't that bad. there's tons of resources and comparisons for that.
but with improving heating, not much can be achieved. the insulation is already pretty good. better models are equipped with heat pumps. that's only helping so and so much, though. you've surfaces heated like the steering wheel, seats, and even armrests at times; which helps with lowering demand of overall cabin heat. the issue with reduced range really mostly stems from them batteries being so sensitive to the environmental conditions.
this might get sorted in future with different battery technology.
@@Justanotherhumanonthenet yes, what you describe may certainly help with range.
maybe it worsens overall efficiency? (something everyone's concerned because of how expensive it this to adapt the power grid.)
I've heard that too. Not a particular concern where we live. Sabine noted that 50% of new car sales in Norway are electric. Norway is pretty cold in the winter. It doesn't seem like the cold weather is negatively affecting EV sales though.
@@brownro214 Norwegians are relatively rich, electricity thanks to ideal geological conditions plentiful and therefore their preferred choice.
Norway is cold but where most people live (close by the sea) not even as cold as you might think. the south tip is where the still warm gulf stream passes by
@@brownro214 I expect that's because a car's normal daily use is substantially less than half the capacity of the battery & ample recharging can be achieved while the car is not in use (most cars are used less than 10% of the day).
(Recently retired from a Fortune 100 US electric company) The big time factor in building new transmission lines is acquisition of the right-of-way. The process often has a lot of dead ends, so the negotiations typically start with getting past choke points. Only after those are identified and commitments acquired can the less challenging parts be negotiated. NIMBY - Not In My Back Yard - is still a problem, as is the perception by potential sellers that they have a unique commodity. 15 years is remarkably fast for these projects.
The other infrastructure concern is electric availability: enough generation at the moment to meet demand. The load/generation curve commonly called the "duck curve" illustrates the breath-taking shortfalls in generation at sundown in particular areas like California and Hawaii. Today, the focus is rightly on grid level storage. Using EVs for storage is a distant possibility: their status is never known (are they full or empty? Will there be fewer or more tonight than last night?).
None of these are insurmountable problems, but they are facets of the folly of politics driving the pace of changes. We can get there - whatever "there" actually looks like - but not nearly as fast as we might like. Fifty years would be very optimistic; 70-80 years more realistic. It is likely we will find we have made quite a few wrong turns on the way. I only know for certain when we get there we will marvel at how naive we are today.
I’ve driven a plug-in hybrid for the past four years and a full battery electric for one year. I also have a solar array on my roof that generates a surplus, so my charging costs are very low. In my experience, the full electric vehicle requires some changes in lifestyle and planning to avoid prematurely degrading the battery or running out if power on a road trip. My plug-hybrid requires almost no change in ordinary habits, except for what is perhaps the most important feature - - home charging - which means only having to visit a gas station for long road trips with 90% of local driving powered by the battery. My full battery electric car is fun to drive and I’m happy that I bought it. But for the average household, I think that a plug-in hybrid with at least 40 miles of range is currently the best option.
Thank you for painting a more complete picture in this revised video.
I'd like to point out, as an EV owner that is charging from a 230V wall socket, you don't need to charge for a whole day. Most of the time, you will not be at 0% but more around 50%.
Also, even if you charge from empty, you still don't have to charge it to 100% if you don't need it! You charge what you need.
..or charge what you can get, be it 60% or 87%. Charging an EV is like grazing instead of gobbling.
@@salipander6570 Or do it when you're sleeping. Most people do.
And even more importantly, we don't all charge from 20% to 80% every night. These calculations need to also include the average distance people drive each day and the average energy consumption of the EVs on the road to calculate the amount of energy needed to charge every night. And they never take solar and home battery uptake into account. I pretty much only need to charge once a week, and I do that from solar on my house, mostly on weekends. Most people doing the work commute will find one or two charging sessions a week will meet their needs easily. If your workplace has the sense to go solar and provides charging infrastructure for employees, then the problem goes away. All the talk about grid infrastructure needs is often partly driven by grid companies seeking to profit from investment in their networks. One of the real drivers of cleaning up our energy systems will be decentralisation, ideally behind the meter, through solar and home storage (and stationary batteries are a much easier target than mobile ones from the resource perspective). Some sensible investment, through low or no interest loans for people to buy locally manufactured home batteries would go a massive way towards grid resilience. Oh, and we get increased domestic security as a byproduct by massively increasing the number of targets an adversary has to hid to cripple our energy systems, and by onshoring more and more of our energy sources.
Yes, I think most of the projections for electricity usage by electric vehicles are inflated. It's advantageous to inflate them for both petrochemical interests and electric grid operators, not to mention various political groups.
This paper presents what I think is an even-handed, trustworthy estimate:
Low energy: Estimating electric vehicle electricity use - david s. rapson rapson.ucdavis.edu/uploads/8/4/7/1/84716372/bbrw_paper_nber_final.pdf
At least, I think it is, but since I'm no energy expert I could be wrong.
"Time/energy to charge to 100%" is a completely irrelevant metric. EV manufacturers need to start advertising in terms of miles/hour of charging instead of whatever the hell they're doing now.
My 2018 Leaf is 250km on a full charge of 40kWh, which means it charges 60km worth per hour on a Level 2 or 12km worth per hour on a standard 120V.
If you commute to work every day and you spend only 10 hours at home, you'll still be able to top up every night plugging into your wall socket as long as your commute is less than 120km both ways. As far as charge times goes, that's literally the only figure that matters.
Thanks for a great video Sabine. I’m using an EV since 2020 in India. At that time there were few fast chargers on the highways so had to request restaurants (Dhabas) on the way to plug in my portable (very slow) charger and order endless tea (chai) and pakoras! That situation has changed rapidly with many fast chargers on the highways set up by different power companies. At home, I put solar PV (grid connected with net metering) so now my car, AC cooling and cooking is practically free and green. Going by the immense change I have seen in India, I am more optimistic than your video!
You own a nexon ev?
Will you pay billions for your grid upgrade?
In India, the sun shines almost every day, but what about countries farther from the equator?
@@piotrrossudowski2758skill issue + plenty of other options than sun
If you have an EV in India you are probably very upper class and well off. People like that seem to have more hope for the future for some reason...
I have a 2023 Mustang Mach E. I have a 40 amp, 240 volt charger (9600 watts) that can bring the car up overnight without fail. For 99% of the driving I do, it's all where I can return home without charging and charge at home. I schedule the charging between 11PM and 6AM where the grid is fairly unloaded -- the car allows one to specify charging times.
My battery chemistry is NMC, and I normally charge to just 80% unless I'm doing a longer trip.
I absolute love the car.
Great video and seems very complete. Thanks.
Outstanding ‘fact based’ and intelligent content. I really appreciate your videos and your subtle but brilliant humour!
I haven't had any issues with using an EV, and now I charge my car using solar, so my grid demand has actually gone down. I hope we'll see more community electricity storage so that solar production could be stored more broadly and efficiently than residential battery storage.
I hope so too - I work in the industry. EVs can use a similar amount of energy to the household before the EV arrived. The electrical industry has moved from resisting change, to working with the change to alternative power - they had no choice anyway. Distributed generation, both commercial and residential, will lighten the load on the established grid generation and transmission. The only thing in the way now is politics.
Congratulations! You are better prepared for any gas price disruptions, wars etc. This prepper attitude will allay range anxiety for many, I think.
Well said. The other aspect of EV is Vehicle to Grid where the EV battery can feed the grid in order to balance the demand with supply.
This V2G also reduces the need for upgrading electricity infrastructure by making it more efficient - presently the electricity infrastructure has been designed to deliver power to end points, like homes and factories, but as roof top solar and batteries (EV and/or home battery) homes and factories become the source of power sending power in the other ( currently unused ) direction.
Yes Officer this one here, he's advocating against energy monopoly. can't have that.
@@BenMitro the only problem I see with vehicle to grid is you are are putting wear on tear on your battery and unless you are making enough selling power you are gonna be stuck with a massive bill replacing your battery. At least grid operators can buy storage at scale to lower their costs.
I'm driving a used Tesla since 2018 that replaced our big car for the long trips. It had around 200.000km on the odometer when I bought it and it is still doing great. The battery is far from dying.
You have 2-3 more years before you'll eat those words.
This is an exception, not the rule. At my small BMW dealership, we do at least 1 battery a month. The Porsche dealership has a similar turnaround rate. Batteries are also prone to burning for three days. That VW ship with $850,000,000 worth of vehicles had a hole melted in the hull, which sank it. Getting close enough to do anything, which is basically nothing, would've killed anyone. I know of three houses burnt down from faulty chargers. I've over 50 bad chargers that almost burnt their house down
And, LFP/LMFP batteries will last even longer than the Ternary batteries… and data is coming in on those early Ternary batteries which are showing lifespans in excess of 400k miles. My last ICE vehicle was falling to pieces after 170k miles… and it was a van, not something that was driven hard and fast. lol
@@chadcooper7348 Lithium technology is volatile garbage. It won't make the cut after Sodium Ion gets energy density on par with current Lithium cobalt. Also, batteries aren't rated in mileage for lifespan, it's a time over discharge/recharge table, not mileage, period. There's also a factor of chemical degradation in the cell after a period of time. Ie, most lead acid batteries are expected to last 3-5 years, Lithium cobalt, 6-8 years, less if you factor in cold weather usage.
@@andyfreeman6865Ever heard of major oil spoils, Ice cars burning in an accident, total engine overhauls, problems with transmissions, cooling systems, fuel system, clutch changes and so on. Evs are costly to buy and maintain on purpose, there is no free ride. There are cheap small city Evs but they don't give much profit to manufactures.
My wife and I drive a 2021 Volkswagen ID.4 Pro S RWD and just love it! We are located on Vancouver Island on Canada's West coast. I am the moderator of two Facebook groups (Canadian EV Supersite and Canadian ID.4 Electric Vehicles). I focus a lot on innovations, the public charging infrastructure and the supporting public policy around electric vehicles.
Since you asked, I’m driving a Subaru Solterra in Japan, and so far am absolutely loving it.
The public chargers, while not ubiquitous, are at least common and have even some 100% free options if you’re willing to visit a public park in Tokyo.
A quick charge at a highway stop is ¥800 with a ¥4000/mo membership fee, or double that without (break even at 3 charges/mo) and several malls such as those run by Mitsui and Aeon have chargers, some of which are free and only cost parking fees, which of course you can also waive by shopping. Many smaller shops have public chargers with the same card system as the highway rest areas, and if approved, businesses can install them completely on the government dime, equipment and construction both, if they’re available to the public, even when payment is required to use them.
I have encountered situations where I couldn’t use the specific charger I wanted, the high amperage chargers are taken first of course, but I haven’t this far encountered a situation where I had to queue for an available charger. Then again, I only took delivery of the car last week, there’s plenty of time yet to be inconvenienced by the bad manners and whims of other drivers.
The standard highway charger is 50kW, which can be awkward in a Solterra with a 71kWh battery. Public rapid chargers limit you to 30 minutes per use, and so while they add about 140 km of range, they in no way will push the battery from 20% to 80% in a single charging session. This is where my preference for said higher amperage chargers is from, and yet some infrastructure is as low as 25 kW, though that’s not typical.
The one thing I do really like about the public charging infrastructure is that there is real-time usage reporting. From either an app or my car navigation, the available, usage or out of service state of chargers is visible, and my car at least lets you restrict searching to available chargers only.
All of that is subject to change of course, but that’s been my experience thus far.
My wife and I drove ~10,000 km from the Vancouver BC area to southern Ontario and Toronto and back again in early May, in our Tesla Model 3 with an LFP battery. We had no problems during our drive, when we relied on the Tesla Supercharger (DCFCs with the Tesla NACS plug) network, and averaged just under 1000km/day during the eastward portion of our drive and our best time was just under 10 hours to drive ~950km and that included charging stops! We averaged about 7km/kwh for the whole trip. I bought the Model RWD with the LFP battery because it is the most efficient electric car available and because Tesla has introduced an adapter so that most newer Teslas can also charge at non-Tesla DC Fast Chargers (DCFCs with the CCS1 plug) which greatly increases the number of fast charging stations available, especially in rural areas. We usually charge at home but the availability of DCFCs makes long trips quite feasible. The DCFC charging network is rapidly expanding in North America and we had no problems driving from BC to SE Arizona and back again, last winter.
Your reasons for your car choice were the same as mine! I took delivery of a 2023 model-3 rwd on last November 28. I charge at home (7 kwh). In December we traveled from Michigan to Tennessee (670 miles), charged 4 times at superchargers. I'm spoiled, haha!
Last Sunday we drove north 67 miles to visit friends, ate, saw a giant Sequoyah tree... drove home and still had 102 miles left.
I've been driving a Tesla for years now. And, a year ago, I got solar panels for my home. I live near Seattle, so the sunlight on my house is not as good for solar power as if I lived in sunny California or any other lower-latitude place. Even so, the solar panels can cover the needs of my car during most seasons of the year.
A fossil fuel car always needs fossil fuels (or expensive synthetic fuels). An electric car doesn't care where its electricity comes from, and solar or wind power can run an electric car.
I believe nearly all of the problems listed in this video can be solved quickly. As Tony Seba and others predicted, solar and wind power is growing at an exponential rate. If it really is a problem to have transformers working at night, then we simply need time-of-use pricing on electricity that encourages charging at the optimal time. In places with a lot of solar power installed, there is the famous "duck curve" where power is pushed onto the grid when it's sunny whether there is need for it or not; in such places, if the rates are cheapest during the day, people would be encouraged to charge their cars during the day and that "duck curve" power will be more likely to be put to good use.
In the long run, electric transportation will reduce the impact of humans on the planet. It's true that it takes more minerals to make an electric car... my car has a battery pack that weighs around 1200 pounds (545 kg) and that battery pack holds 100 kWh, about the energy of 3 gallons of gas (11.4 litres). Yet the EPA estimated range of my car (when new) was 335 miles (539 km)! And that battery pack should work for at least a couple of decades, and then will be recycled, whereas fossil fuels, once burnt, are not only gone (needing to be totally replaced) but also add pollutants and carbon dioxide products to the atmosphere. Compare that battery pack weight with the weight of gasoline: I've computed that my old VW station wagon would burn about 3600 pounds of gasoline (1633 kg) each year I drive it. If we assume my electric car lasts 20 years, it (including all the minerals in it) would prevent the burning of 72000 pounds of gasoline (32660 kg)!
Then consider the second-order savings. Gasoline is made out of atoms and must be hauled around: tanker ships bring crude oil, refineries make gasoline, trucks deliver gasoline to the filling station. In contrast, electricity flows through wires. (And I make most of the electricity I need from the roof of my house.) I've read that 40% of all ships on the ocean are hauling fossil fuels around (oil, natural gas, or coal). When the majority of our energy used is electricity, and the majority of generation is renewable, the pollution and waste associated with the fossil fuel economy will mostly disappear.
Electric cars are a rare case where doing the right thing is no sacrifice. My electric car is the nicest car I've ever owned. The only thing wrong with it is that it cost a lot up front, but it's extremely inexpensive to operate it. (Especially considering I live in the state with the most expensive gasoline in the USA, but relatively inexpensive electricity. And once my solar panels are paid off, I'll get a great deal of electricity at no further cost to me.)
I would be happy if all new houses were designed and built to have solar power generation on the roof, and a ground-source heat pump for heating and cooling. It will always be less expensive to design such things into the house and build at scale, than to build houses without them and retrofit later. And people won't mind the cost of solar or the heat pump if those costs are rolled into the mortgage.
Good lord, where to start on your comment, and do I even want to bother.
There is not one easy fix to the problems she mentioned and if you think there are, you and I didn't watch the same video.
You putting solar panels on your upper-middle-class Seattle home has nothing to do with the entire rework that's going to have to happen across the globe to accommodate this.
Suffice it to say, before I go even an inch deeper into this: Unless we do something about China and India's emissions, the entire Western World could literally drop off the map tomorrow and make nary a dent in the bottom line global effect.
That seems to be something conveniently ignored. We could commit cultural suicide in the West and go completely dark tomorrow, and nothing would change as far as hitting the climate "event horizon" tipping point.
So, there's that.
Just remember that unless you decarbonize China and India, nothing you or I do affects any outcomes. Too little way too late.
The "exponential" solar growth has been largely subsidized by tax dollars, not market demand. It's also been a colossal cluster-f that has created a slave labor market due to lithium demand and truly offered very little. Even the most fluffed numbers are diresome.
Your solution would require *extreme* government intervention to a degree and will require further reach into citizens' already-ailing pockets for a solution that will likely have no meaningful outcome on global temps. (Because again...China and India. I want everything I say here to be viewed from the lens that *nothing* we do matters unless China switches away from coal. They're building entire coal supply railroads to supply the hundreds of new plants they're building yearly...to ironically power their EVs)
EV tech is a unidimensional view of environmental harm that ONLY takes the boogeyman of CO2 into account and not the entire Lithium battery pipeline and the actual LIFETIME environmental damage of an EV; The chemicals poured into the earth to refine lithium, the repair, the disposal of lithium, the slave child labor, the problem of there just not *being* enough lithium on the planet for us to go full EV.
The smelting and maintenance of the blades, The entire species of migrating birds they're killing, the forests that have to be cleared to erect them. Oh, and solar panels. The toxic chemicals involved in their manufacturing and disposal are only the tip of the iceberg.
So you may get some CO2 relief only to poison your water with the toxic manufacturing offshoots of lithium batteries and solar panels.
A study I read recently estimates that, in the US, you're saving about 15% CO2 over the entire the life of an EV, when all things are taken into account. (Versus a state of the art economy-minded gasoline vehicle.
This study was based in America, where the majority of power is produced by coal. An EV charged by a coal-fired plant is less efficient than many modern gasoline engines.
If everyone had the money to kit their houses out with solar panels and buy a $50,000, EV we'd be in business. But until then, I see this new brand of environmentalism as an upper middle-class issue that only the rich have *time* to care about.
Couple this with resistance to new nuclear technologies that I see coming from the loudest climate proponents, and I start to realize that many people care a whole lot less about carbon output than they do finding a way to track purchases and tack on new carbon taxes for things we're already paying taxes on.
Until the loudest voices in the modern environmental movements take nuclear seriously, I can't take them terribly seriously.
I'm on a phone, so unable to really phrase things how I'd like but. The bottom line is there's nothing easy about reworking the entire country's power grid and putting 7p trillions of dollars of new infrastructure to accommodate an electric future.
It also ignores so many unintended consequences.
The answer right now is nuclear. Maybe in 50 years we will have a viable solution, but that hasn't been invented yet.
Current EV tech is pretty much for city-dwellers with minimal commutes who live in climates that don't get too hot or cold. (Because heat destroys a battery's longevity and cold destroys a battery's capacity)
It's why most of the people who have such lovely experiences with EVs live on the west coast in temperate climates and drive 30mins or less to work.
EV's are an upper middle class luxury right now and until they actually become affordable for the majority, it's going to remain that way.
Synthetic fuel would be cheap if the power is cheap or free to produce it
@@jemima_brownthe battery won't last 20 years. I almost bought EV vans until I found out I'd be replacing the battery every 18 months to 2 years. My vans travel 3,500 miles per month
@@Justanotherhumanonthenet existing infrastructure, poor people can keep what they already have. 3rd world countries would be able to use it. No one would have to purchase anything. People would be able to keep their jobs in the industry
@@Bryan-Hensley Where did you get those crazy numbers from? Look into how many cycles LFP- and sodium-ion batteries can do. Your van will likely fall apart before the battery dies.
Thanks Sabine, you do an amazing job with your videos.
I ordered a battery EV car last week. Tested it a few weeks ago and it was some really cool experience, and that's an understatement.
Why now? Well, because the technology reached the point to be practical _in the place where I live in_, and that's a very important distinction. The car has a 77kWh battery, that gives you around 550km of range. The island where I live in (Gran Canaria) is perfect for this kind of range, in fact with a fully charged battery I could drive round-trips around the whole island 3 times and still have a quite a bit of battery left, so the range anxiety depends a lot on the circumstances of every individual driver and the place where the car will be used. I will have a 7.2kW charging station at home, so the battery will be full every morning easily, and I don't think I will have to ever go to a public charging station at all.
So at the end for the question "Are EV cars practical?" the answer is "Depends on where you live". At some places, like where I live, it is already, by far. But, for some other bigger places where you may have to drive for hundreds of kilometers in a single day, the situation can be more complicated, and depends too much on charger infrastructure.
I think the range anxiety depends even more on your lifestyle than where you live, commuting long distances everyday is also lifestyle dependent. I work from home most days so charging at home is more than enough. Living in rural areas solar is probably a good choice and should be enough.
Fast charging wastes most of the electricity and will increase pollution!!!!!
@@anthonytrujillo106 Really? Please explain
We have two cars at home and one is a BEV. We have a garage and a nearby 240V outlet. If you plan on replacing one of your cars and can charge it at home, you have no calculations to make. If you can supply all the charging yourself it is absolutely a no-brainer. Even if you have no environmental concerns, do it for the money. I am saving well over 50% of the total previous household fuel costs. We got the new car last December. I have tried quick changing on trips but in Costa Rica, it is still far from dependable. I plan a longer trip to a rural area for the end of the year. That trip will be in my old car.
The Tesla Charger always work easily. But charging at home is far easier and cheaper. A lot of us have 240 volt power in the US with up to 48 amp usable. You can charge at about 45 miles per hour with this setup.
Nice! Wouldn't it be easier to be in Park while charging?
@@alib6060
It would certainly save on extention cords.
Here in Korea, charging is just not really an issue. Most apartment complexes have charging in the car park now, as do supermarkets, libararies, etc. The grid doesn't seem to be overloaded, and electric cars are very popular now - projected to be about 15% of total units in circulation by the end of the year
I just plug my car in at night, maybe once every 2 weeks or so, and it charges for about 20% of the cost it does for a petrol car. I can drive it for about 6-8 hours before needing to charge
It's a no-brainer - just needs infrastructure
Thanks for the video. I have been driving evs for 5 years from a leaf 24kwh to a 30kwh and now a 44 kwh BMW I3, these were all bought as as commuter cars, What is intresting is that they have gone from barely 12O kms range to 300kms range for the same budget,. I think energy efficiency is the Key to the EV transition, which is one of the motivations for buying the I3. More efficient vehicles would surmount a lot of the problems you correctly raise. I am a shareholder of Aptera motors which is a super efficient EV that can get a lot of its power from solar energy,
I am glad you revise a video if needed!
I drive a Tesla model 3 for 4 years now. And I drive a lot. More than 40.000 km per year. I drive mostly long distances between Holland and the south of France. 4 years ago I had to plan a bit more, to be sure to find superchargers when needed. Now there are almost dubble the amount. So now it’s a breeze. No worries at all. With my previous car I also took a break every 2 or 3 hours just to stay alert and healthy. Now I do the same, at the supercharger. So almost no extra time for me.
I would never go back to fuel. Apart from driving cleaner with a BEV, I like how it drives!
Yes. Ditto
I have to say that tens of billions doesn't really sound that much if one considers that the USA spends hundreds of billions on military each year...
We need the military. Think of how much money is wasted producing the insane amount of movies produced. Hundreds of billions of dollars spent on wasting people’s time and lives on a bunch of stupid recycled stories and plots. What an enormous waste.
Even Germany found a 100 billion for its military just lying around when it became clear that Russia was still a threat. On top of regular spending, of course.
@@cougar2013 you need about a tenth of your current military. In its current form is pure socialism.
@@cougar2013 We need an inhabitable planet even more.
@@4203105 To be fair, they also found 200 billion for fighting climate change ("Klima- und Transformationsfonds"). It's indeed not a money problem.
Investing in public transportation and building the right infrastructure for it would help with this problem too
@@JustanotherhumanonthenetBike? ;)
@@Justanotherhumanonthenet In these types of areas, where everything is just a million miles away, cars make 100% sense.
I've been driving a plugin hybrid (Honda Clarity) with >40 mile electric capability for several years now, and while doing so is probably not adding much pressure on industry to improve the charging network (I charge mainly at home and at work), it has been a very satisfying experience for me. I probably average >90% running on electricity, and have zero range anxiety. I understand that I'm not getting all the benefits of all-electric vehicles (low mechanical complexity), but it's a very good tradeoff for me personally, and the car doesn't lug around a battery that is way oversized for 90% of the use cases. The very few times a year I need long range, and/or drive in a rural area, I use gasoline once the battery runs out. It's a shame the technology isn't catching on more.
Thanks, Sabine for saying very important things that aren't heard anywhere else.
I heard "subsidies" in this video many times, and sadly this is true. However, we observe that governments deal with it in two ways:
1. They put additional requirements and costs on energy distributors and producers (ETS costs and others), those regulations increase the cost of producing energy which is the reason why prices of energy in the EU are one of the highest in the world and still rising.
One of the craziest regulations was to force energy distributors to buy power generated privately from solar or wind generators even if that power cannot be sold, or can only be sold at a fraction of what that private producer gets for it. This also needs to be financed from higher bills for homeowners. It also makes the energy market chaotic, green power is not produced in places that need that power, it is wasted and we pay for that waste.
2. They do indeed make subsidies, which need to be financed, from taxes of course, which makes the EU a place with the sharpest rising taxes in the last years, and more are in the way.
Sorry Sabine, some more corrections..
1. Producing hydrogen gas from electrolysis isn't bad to run on intermittent electricity because the reaction is "slow to ramp" up per se. It's because it becomes uneconomical when the capital cost of electrolysers is (currently) too large to have them "standing by and standing back" most of the time.
2. You stop at 80% most of the time because NMC (nickel, managese, cobolt) Li-on batteries don't like being fully charged & it goes slow at the end - this is not true if you have other battery chemistries like LFP (Lithium iron phosphate) or use an AC charger 11kw or lower. With NMC you should ideally go down only to 20% for the same battery care reasons.
3. Overall maintenance costs for EVs are often lower than ICE cars so long as you take care of the battery - there are far less moving parts that can wear out. At the same time EVs are more expensive to insure for the reasons you explained. One should do an total cost of ownership calculation for it to make any sense of this (fuel/repairs/insurance/interest costs), to see which is "cheaper".
Same with coal power stations. But if you let them run, they’re extremely efficient
Recycling might be the main source of lithium in the future. I think China is closer to 50% of energy from renewables than 15%.
1. I don't disagree, but I think that the problem I mention will be the more relevant in the long run.
2. Yes the statement at the beginning is for the currently most widely used batteries. I am very sorry I did not spell this out explicitly, I did not anticipate it would cause misunderstanding.
3. I am very sorry I did not spell out in more detail exactly what the cost breakdown comes from, but there's only so much you can cram into 20 minutes.
Thanks for your interest.
@@SabineHossenfelder thanks, I appreciate your effort!
i would very much see that 3 point as well, it is the crux of the issue after all, are we going from a better technology to a worse one or the other way.
i would add total cost of ownership over lifetime comparison, which live for longer, which cost more upfront and what other indirect costs are added to own one.
sorry for the last point as that rather directly goes against evs, but ive seen quite a lot of comments on it, its nice if you can afford things but its only IF you can afford them and most of the world population can not just jump from poor to rich in a day, it takes tremendous amounts of Work or in other words Energy, energy that must come from somewhere.
Sure its nice and "cheap" to charge with your own solar, or heck a mini/residential nuclear power plant, but it will just cost up front in "fuel" rather than step by step in time.
in the end i would like us to be realistic, not just have pink coggles on and then get to regret our decisions later in life, i dont really care it were gonna be an EV, ICE or more probably a mix* civilization in the future, i would rather like our efforts to go in the right place and do what they purportedly do than to just appease our feelings, rather shallowly, and make things worse then they are in the long run.
*the right technology for the right things
I have been driving electric since 2012 and my family (2 cars) exclusive electric since 2014. We driving ~ 12k mi/year in each car, go on road trips, etc everything typical people do with cars. The picture you present does not reflect my experience in North America with Tesla; Superchargers are generally widely available and very VERY dependable (unlike the competition- a question of incentives) and home charging has been a complete non-issue.
My other beef with your exposé is that it leans to heavily on the current state of things. Ford CEO not withstanding, battery prices _have_ been falling dramatically over this decade.
Final thing that was frankly ridiculous: repair cost. Fact is: the maintenance of our Teslas have been far far cheaper than the ICE cars we had previously. And they are cheaper to operate (I have records to prove this).
Then another idea is instead of using charging stations along highways, is to have a electrical wire system the vehicle can connect to such as were used by electric trams in cities where a attachment on top of the tram connected to the overhead wires. No charging stations along highways needed at all, and the smaller battery packs only needed for local driving helps to conserve the materials the battery manufacturing requires.
Gas stations along highways would be the losers in this scenario but as gasoline is being phased out they would disappear anyway to reappear as something else for land use.
Great review, your opening comment says it all, reduce your need to drive. Everything you have stated I have researched. We do 10,000KM a year in my 2017 Euro 6 diesel. My calculations have worked out in the UK with the energy generation mix of 285 grammes of CO2 per KWh it would take 29 years to offset the CO2 of a new electric car. A lot of people are being completely conned by being "pious in their Prius" by buying an electric car. I should point out that we are virtuality carbon nuetral at home including a wood fired heating system, bore hole and solar panels. Hence the reason I researched buying an EV. If you live in Norway and Northern Sweden yes👍
I'm actually proud to say as an American, that I've lived my entire life without owning a car. I don't ever expect anyone around me to acknowledge that as an accomplishment, but with the money I saved, I was able to buy my own house.
At this point in my 40's, it's paid off and I'm completely debt free.
I live in a large city on the East Coast, a quarter mile from a supermarket in either direction, and a Home Depot. There tons of restaurants & parks close by, and I ride my bike wherever I go.
Never have to worry about parking, and the bike lanes are constantly improving. I feel like I'm living the new American dream. Hopefully, someday everyone else will join me :)
I just had to like your comment. That is genuinely quite an achievement, and you at least get a high-5 from me!
it isn't easy to not own a car if you're married with kids I could guess
@@kfireven Friend of mine lives in a larger German city and never owned a car. He does borrow one from time to time though. Not owning one doesn't mean you never use one.
@@EngineersFear yeah, I really don't mind about owning or using a car, I'm very satisfied with public transportation and like OP I also got everything I need around my house and I have much more important things to waste my money on. The problem starts when you begin dating, the ladies have high demands (at least here in Israel), they think that everything, all the chores will be on the one who owns a car - for arrangements, kids going to kindergarten/school, medical emergencies, travel, etc... so it's good as long as you're single, but the changes to find a partner with the same mindset is very low
I was born brain damaged and I'm now blind. I live in London and obviously have never been medically allowed to drive a car. I have relied on public transport and my own two feet, traveling the 10 miles to school on my own via train since the age of 8. I would severely severely struggle in the countryside but London is very connected with public transport albeit not perfect but definitely good enough. I do use taxis when my health is poor or its a really tricky journey to make (like going to Guys & St Thomas's Hospital absolutely need a taxi for that). But I live independently and nobody within 75 miles that I know can drive a car. So I'm pretty much car free except for the occasional taxis. London is great for being able to go car free although there are obviously some limitations.
One thing which I think is underrated and rarely mentioned is that the switch to EV is a catalyst towards other changes. It's something visible which brings the message home and starts people thinking. They are a gateway drug leading people to look at Solar, insulation and home batteries and from there many other improvements. I think we massively under value the impact EVs have on public awareness of climate change and showing that change is not just possible....it can be better.
I agree with that. Even since getting an EV I started thinking about getting solar for the house as well and pay way more attention to what kind of fuel sources my energy company uses to make the electricity.
@@MD-mf4fj Just don't demand the immediate shutdown of our present fossil fuel fired electric power plants...to effect power shortages and way higher price.
If you are really rich, maybe, but for most people, it's either EV or other improvements because it's all expensive and have long ROI.
@@mrblc882 If you have to fund it all yourself. But there are lots of grants, schemes and offers out there to help for some people. As the costs of energy rise more and more people are taking the plunge to invest now to save money in the future.
I sold my diesel car in April 2022 and bought a secondhand 2018 BMW i3 94Ah. I drive about 15,000 miles (24,000kM) per year. At around the same time I had 40 solar panels with a peak output of 15.5kW fitted on my house roof and 45kW of battery storage. The latter was necessary in the UK because most houses only have a Single Phase supply, feed-in is therefore limited to 4kW and I didn't want to throw away available energy. 4kW is a ridiculous limit to impose. The peak output power from the panels had been factored to extend use of home generated electrical energy into October and March.
Apart from longer journeys when I have to use fast chargers the car runs on home generated solar energy. I don't suffer 'Range Anxiety'. I plan journeys beforehand, use Eco Pro on the i3 by default and on motorway driving often opt for slip-streaming large lorries.
The whole exercise has been fun (80% of the time - when my wife is with me she doesn't care for the risks I take with range but the closest we came to running out still left us with 3 miles when we reached a charger - she was not happy). I would certainly never go back to an ICE. I would say 70% of my mileage costs me nothing in electricity because it's "free" if you ignore the investment I've made.
Why did I do it? Because I know someone who lives near Barmouth in Wales who has been told by the Environment Agency that their house, along with 220,000 other homes in England and Wales will be lost to the sea, as levels rise. We have also begun to see an exodus of climate refugees leaving equitorial regions to move to more Northern latitudes dying in small boats. We all owe a duty to reduce our use of carbon to help the rest of mankind. Where you are born is an accident of fate, not choice.
Funny, more than once during this video I said to myself "but what about..." then you promptly talked about the what. Nicely done.
I would love to hear a deeper dive on recycling of the various types of battery packs. It seems there are only two types of recycling videos, terrible recycling or awesome recycling.
The awesome recycling videos tend to have more real data than opinions.
We've had a Model Y long range for two years and we love it. I find it cumbersome and awkward when I am required to drive a gas car now. The lag in throttle response and having to switch to the brake pedal every time you stop or slow down is annoying. I also like the 8 year, 125,000 mile drivetrain and battery pack warranty.
Yes a deeper dive would be nice.
Until then, the short version is that several researches (including one done by AU Govt) has shown that recycling 90% of batteries is totally feasible and economical. There will be some difficulties, but it can be done. One of the current difficulties simply is the demand for that at the moment. There are a few companies around that are already completely recycling batteries, but those are very few and far between. Again simply because there is not a big demand for needing more at the moment.
And there likely will not be a strong demand for that quite some time to come. As batteries, especially those for vehicles and generally some sort of lithium base, will have a second life purpose elsewhere for a very long time. For instance a battery bank for a vehicle can easily last well over a decade as its life expectancy. But that life expectancy is going to be about 70% SoC. So those will unlikely be recycled as you will likely be able to sell it for a second purpose use for better price than recycling company can make. And that battery bank will last another very long time. You are easily talking about decades before it needs recycling. There will be a demand down the road in the future, in like say 30 years or longer. Batteries banks will more than likely in most cases outlast the vehicle before it even reaches its life expectancy, and then see a second life elsewhere, although there will always be exceptions of course.
I have been driving EV's for nearly 6 yrs and in that time it has changed dramatically. The nearest charging hub to me had just 3 chargers, now it has 64. In my town there was just 1 rapid chargers now there are 8 rapids and 40 destination chargers.
When I first started I needed to plan my trip but now there are enough chargers not to worry about it, plus the car will take me to one when it needs it.
Driving EV's is great fun and so relaxing with the one pedal driving ie press your foot down to go and lift it to brake. Of course I now drive a Tesla and I never get tired of that acceleration, it never fails to put a smile on my face
Nice you can afford a Tesla. I just bought a new car for twenty thousand. That's all I can afford.
@@bilahn1198 I sold my last EV for £16k but life has been good.
My only advice is not to buy a new ICE vehicle at the moment, they arent selling and people are just holding off until the price of an EV drops a bit more, Tesla will be making a new model next year which will sell for £25k and with very low running costs that makes it cheaper to own than an ICE vehicle, also MG make some very good EV's now for £25k, not a good time to buy an ICE car
@@bilahn1198I bought a used Chevy Bolt in 2021 for $20K. The only thing that sucks about it is that the DC fast charging is slow (it’s based on 2016 speeds; you have to stop for 60-75 minutes if you’re on a road trip). Otherwise, it’s a great little car.
EVs still need to get cheaper, but things are moving the right direction. Especially if you consider the total cost of ownership; EVs tend to cost more at the beginning but less over the life of the car due to fewer things that can break, no oil changes, and lower fuel costs.
I recently got a Tesla model 3, I love it. From the hassle free purchase without having to deal with a rip off car dealer to the ease of charging at home, it is wonderful.
I bought my first Tesla in 2015, and my second in 2018, and the car is … adequate. But the dealerships all suck! By far the worst dealership experiences of my life have all been with Tesla. Prior to my first Tesla I had mostly owned BMWs and M-Bs, with the occasional Audi and a few Lotus, so perhaps comparing to Ford or Chrysler wouldn’t make Tesla look so bad, but I doubt even Big-3 dealers lie as much as Tesla lies about their cars, and the service experience is simply atrocious, it’s a good thing Teslas need essentially zero maintenance.
@@jemima_brown fixed price means everyone pays the same price, which means that people in a weak bargaining position aren’t unfairly at a disadvantage. For example, women, minorities, people with less than stellar credit… at a traditional dealership where the price reflects the privilege of the buyer, all those people would have to pay a higher price than the white man with a great job and fantastic credit. At a dealership that charges a fixed price, people in a weaker negotiating position aren’t forced to subsidize the purchases of the people of privilege in a strong negotiating position.
Sabine. Really appreciate all of your videos. Informative and NOT boring. We own a 2014 Tesla Model S and a 2022 Tesla Model 3. We just completed the installation of 17 kW of roof mounted solar panels and two Tesla Powerwall 2 batteries. I will be in the dog house for a while yet as my lovely wife is not happy about the cost. I am looking at the long term. Living in northern Vermont (USA) we have limited solar input and during winter months there’s not much Solar with clouds and the sun being so low on the mountainous horizon. Living in such a beautiful place means compromises. Worth it. Our electricity is 90% combination of hydroelectric, solar, wind and nuclear. Natural gas is used for times of heavy demand and emergencies. We charge at our house and at Tesla Superchargers when on the road. Tesla has nailed it with their Superchargers. Reliable, frequent and convenient. Not a fan of how Elon Musk has evolved but Tesla really excels with their cars and batteries. Thank you for your work.
Excellent. As a retired physics teacher, I love your depth. An old Scientific American article studied the most efficient transportation, incl birds, planes, walking, horses, etc…. 10 speed BIKES were far ahead of everything. Think of walking a km vs biking a km.... I like Sailboats that use solar energy by slowing storm winds, with no pollution. (make sails with photocells) Also LIVE LOCAL, stop Globalization. Grow a garden. Sew clothes. Buy from farmer markets
Thanks a bunch for all your work, Sabine! 😊
Stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊
Aliens 😂
As I commented last time: the overwhelming number of cars is parked more than 22hrs a day. So you could charge almost all of them all the time with low voltage. Meaning, you wouldn't have significant usage peaks at any time of the day at all. You just need comparably cheap plugs wherever cars are parked. The "alternative charging method in Germany" part is kinda hilarious, because electric trams have been around for 150 years and trains and also buses that are powered this way are not at all new technology.
I think you mean low power, not low voltage.
I think most EVs by far in Norway are charged slowly over night, and quite a few are probably charged slowly at work.
In the last video I think she mentioned transformers need to cool down over night in warmer climates. My average electricity consumption has increased by a huge amount since we got an EV so I’m not sure how significant of a problem that will actually be. But even if it is wouldn’t it just be a matter of increasing the size of the container for the transformer, so it has more surface area to cool from? The transformer itself doesn’t need to be bigger
Yeah I live in a condo with no garage (well it does have a garage but the gf parks there, only room for 1). Can't charge at work. And I like to go camping, and strangely the wilderness has no charging stations. So yeah, I'm keeping my ICE vehicle.
And yeah I get annoyed when elites make policy. They don't understand how poorer people live. Not everyone has garages. In fact, I've never had a garage in 50 years of living.
I wish I didn’t have to drive and could just chill on a tram or train 😢
The standard uses case is: Drive to work in the morning, drive home on the afternoon, du things with you car (one needs food and there is something called free time), so the car will be available for charging in the evening. That gives something between 8 and 10 hours of charging. And afaik that is not enough time to fully charge a car with normal voltage. And we would get the usage peak in the night that Sabine is talking about for sure. Also charging something with a powerline while driving is not the same as just using the power. But you are right, it works, but is is very expensive.
Since you asked... We bought our first Tesla in 2019, only maintenance was cabin filter and tires. Practically no brake wear as we use regenerative braking. No coolant/Oil to worry about. No engine to turn on for heating and cooling. No range anxiety, 100% reliable superchargers. We have one home charger in the garage, plenty for our family fleet of, now 4, Teslas. Also fun and safe to drive. No going back to ICE cars...
I always have trouble understanding what is wrong with Bicycles, feet & public transport!
Still, Thanks Sabine for another great info-video!
Dave.
_Bicycles, feet & public transport!_ Bicycles and cars do not mix. Feet hurt on rough hot roads. Public transport is not door-to-door. (Sometimes cars are not door-to-door either.)
Urban planning, mostly. The typical modern city - especially in the US - was really built around the car. There are zoning rules that separate residential and commercial areas, so there isn't anywhere within walking distance - all shops and workplaces are in a different part of the city from the homes. The road layout is made to maximise efficiency for car transport, with little regard to cyclists or pedestrians. The suburbs are especially bad, as their population density is too low to even support public transport - the houses are spaced so far apart that no matter where you put a bus stop or subway station, there wouldn't be enough people in walking distance to support it. If they could even reach it without having to cross dangerous six-lane roads.
Public transport and walkable/bikable cities would be great, but it's hard to undo a century of city design. Politically difficult too, in that you'd have to change a lot of laws which still have public support: People like the comfortably spread-out suburban sprawl where they can live in a mini-mansion and be happy that none of the icky poor people can afford to live nearby.
There are a few youtube channels dedicated to the issue of poor urban planning, especially the impact of car-focused design. I'd suggest www.youtube.com/@NotJustBikes and www.youtube.com/@strongtowns
I have used each many times, commuting on foot for a few days and by bicycle for a few months at a time, amounting to about two years out of my 48 years working. I have several times lived in urban areas where bus service was non-existent.
Bicycling is not for the timid. I have been caught in downpours, blinding sandstorms, and had cars turn in front of me while they were still beside me.
Fine and dandy if you are fit enough but many people are too old and some are disabled.
@@user-jb7uz4hs2i Selective respect never sounded like respect to me. The Good Samaritan parable has lost its meaning entirely. It is a sociopathic culture that is terribly short of STEM values./rant
Thanks for bringing up the infrastructure Issue for BEVs. It was the most worrisome thing I considered when debating on getting an Bev. For my daily commute the overnight 120 works fine, but it is a concern that I hope gets resolved. I have seen 2 new chargers added to my area after buying my Bev so hopefully that's a good sign. So far, I love my car so much nicer than my old Honda.
At least she is educating the dense about this massive issue.
@@jeffwads dense or slow?
We have 230v in Australia, my house has 3 phase so we can charge at 11kW.
Funny thing is we don’t actually need more than 3.6kW
@@lindam.1502 In South Africa, the same. In fact, with our planned power outages (load shedding) a bi-directional BEV is ideal.
The true solution is cheap, clean and reliable public transport systems for both commuters and freight.
Apparently 45% of Americans have no access to public transport. Changing that might be less than the trillions needed to upgrade the electrical system but it is unlikely to happen, especially since devotion to cars is entrenched as it is.
In the US, the average driving distance per day is 37 miles, so roughly 10 hours of charging on a 120 volt standard outlet is enough, which all houses will have. Assuming you want a faster charge, simple devices to share a plug for a dryer charger are available. The amount of extra capacity needed is less than the amount from adding air conditioning which was added to most homes since the 1960s. Also, the video does not consider economies of scale. Already cost per kWh for batteries has dropped since the release of this video about 6 months ago. And renewable electricity generation has increased as well, making a cleaner grid. With things changing so fast, Sabine will have to update this every six months! And that is a good thing.
I have owned a Gen 2 Chevy Volt since 2016, and it is the best car I ever owned. It is a technological marvel. Very reliable, very solid and a pleasure to drive on the highway and in the city. Just turned 100,000 kms on it, and averaged 1.5 l/100 km since its manufacture. Highway fuel consumption is about 4 l/100 km. Sadly, GM stopped manufacturing it a couple of years ago. As I live in Canada, and there can be long distances between cities, PHEVs make the most sense and when the time comes to replace the Volt, I'll be looking for another PHEV vehicle. Sadly, all the PHEV SUVs have a very limited all-electric range. I wish manufacturers made PHEV SUVs with at least 120 km all-electric range.
When I lived in Warsaw, Poland, I didn't own a car. There were two tramlines on either side of my apartment building one of which took me to the metro in one stop, and a train station that was a short walk away, all running on electricity. I had no need of a car at all. From what I have seen, cars exist to mainly serve their owners vanity. They are status symbols and if there was a well developed mass transit system they would largely be unneeded. Now I live in Los Angeles, and the amount of dust raised by cars speeding past my apartment building clings to my blinds and builds up on every interior surface. Many of these cars are electric but they still emit brake dust, tire dust and noise from their tires which I find stressful and is probably unhealthy.
You are right, cars are a fundamental problem, co2 is the biggest, but other emissions and the land use of more and more highways must be added in the reckoning. But of course Sabine is right, most people never will give up their cars, so the development towards EVs is nessecary, if we turn to regenerative electricity.
It is unhealthy for shure
Definition of "dangerous" emission is the key. They will find a new definition, dust, brake dust, tyre dust. Electric waves maybe too🤷🏽♂️
Most of us travel too fare between job and home
@@kayfelix5054 right, but electric waves are not, we have already so much, we all would be dead, if they would be dangerous
Yeah, but most of us don't live anywhere that public transport of any kind provides a plausible or convenient solution to getting around. BEVs are the perfect solution.
It's not just raised dust, a lot of it is apparently tire particles. Those are carcinogenic microplastics that cover everything, our lungs included.
I always wish such videos included a mention of how good and how much more efficient the alternatives can be. High speed trains, trams, trolleybuses? They all run on electricity with no need of a battery, are more efficient (trains and trams especially), can be used by elderly, disabled, children and drunk people, require a lot cheaper infrastructure and are better for the environment. High speed trains can even be 3-4 times faster than cars for intercity transport! It's just most people haven't witnessed how good they can be.
I live in an apartment in Los Angeles that I can barely afford. It's a one room studio. I have no parking. My flat is on the same wiring as the apartment building, i.e. utilities included. If I run my air conditioner and the toaster it pops the circuit breaker on main board for the building. All of the building lights and the laundry room go dark. I don't think, even if I had a parking place, that I could charge an EV here. And my work schedule and commute leave me just enough time for 8 hours of sleep and a few hours in the morning for breakfast and chores, so I'm not going to spend that time driving to wait in line at a fast charging point that will then take hours to charge my car. My whole life would then be driving to work, working my shift, driving home, sleeping, waking up, driving to a charging place and waiting, waiting, waiting, then driving to work. I would need a 5 minute charge time, to full, because my commute isn't short. Secondly, there is no room in my budget to even buy another car. I'm driving a 1996 Honda that I had bought for $300. There is no part of my income that can be directed to a new car. I used to have a short commute until my workplace moved. I don't fly anywhere, I live in 300 sq ft of space, while others live in lavish 11,000 sq ft homes, jet set to Europe multiple times per year, consume on a much grander scale than I can even imagine, but oh, they drive Teslas and are saving the world.
Sounds like LA needs a good bus system. Maybe self-driving cars will provide a service like Uber by 2030, except cheaper. Then you could ditch your car and not pay for insurance or gas, just cheap Ubery-thing. Other possibilities... car-pooling, electric bike (bring the battery inside to charge) or star in a TV series called "One Broke Guy" and have a limo drive you around.
LA is a big city. There should be amazing public transport. I know in the case of LA there is not, but you guys should really work on that. I agree, EVs are not the highest priority for you.
Congratulations on your episode on electric cars. A couple of points from someone who has driven a Kia Soul EV for 3 years. They are fantastic to drive. Far nicer and easier than a I/C car. If you have off street parking(60% in U.K.) you can start every day with a ‘full tank’. Overnight charging is far cheaper on low rate tariff. Cost of ownership is way lower. In the first two years we didn’t use a commercial charger once. With a range of 260/300 miles, depending on ambient temperature, it wasn’t necessary with our sort of driving. Normally you charge to 80% for good battery life but if you have a long journey you set to 100%. The battery on our car does not seem to have deteriorated in the 3 years. However, I would not have one if I was driving 500/800 miles a week and be cautious if I did not have off street parking. However the charging infrastructure in UK is improving rapidly and we have done 1000 mile round trips since the pandemic with relative ease. Watch out for the many 7kw chargers though. A service station overnight is not fun! Remember if you are charging at home the odd 40 mins in a service area still means you are spending less time ‘filling up’ than an I/C car. Obviously I am looking at this from the user angle and understand the implications for updating the power grid etc. No more awful I/C stop/start systems driving me mad and no worry during petrol/diesel shortages. Oh, and servicing is minimal!
All your points are highly subjective but I have to refute the last few - start/stop systems are common but you can still buy IC cars without one. Additionally they can be disabled. Gas shortages don't occur often enough to be an argument against an IC car and finally, the maintenance is mininal on all new cars - IC or electric. After a few years (or enough kilometers) the maintenance will be significantly more expensive on your electric car then on a comparable IC one.
@@alisav8394 We are all subjective! Is that a crime? So are you, which is no problem for me. You couldn’t turn off my stop/start Peugeot. Maybe an EU rule. Plse advise why maintenance on an EV will be higher than I/C? I guess you are thinking of battery replacement after circa a decade. Good point. But if you amortise over 10 years from the savings on ‘gas’ you’ll be still saving money. Look forward to your ‘objective’ reply.
@@alisav8394 why do you think maintenance on an old EV will be more expensive than on an old IC? If worked myself on old IC cars and I can tell you especially for the modern ones: they have a lot of difficulties and most of them have to do with fluids, engines or exhaust.
@@alisav8394I have a ten year old EV and a ten year old Prius. My cost of ownership for the last two years has been about $1700 less for the EV. Much of that is due to fuel cost, but some is due to the fact that maintenance costs on the Prius have been significantly higher. I know that my anecdote doesn't prove anything, but I don't accept the claim that EVs will have higher overall maintenance costs than ICE vehicles. The Boogeyman of EV maintenance costs is battery replacement, but how often does battery failure happen compared with how often ICE vehicles have expensive mechanical failures?
The minimal servicing is nice, in theory as long as the servicing is opened up to all mechanics. The fact that electric vehicles are simpler means that manufacturers cannot rely on a revenue stream for parts. So servicing is going to be more expensive, and the independent mechanics are locked out. We need right to repair laws.
Gasoline stations make very little money from selling gasoline, the markup is only about 1.2%. They make money from the sales of lottery tickets, convenience foods, beer, water, etc.
So the basic infrastructure is there to set up an electric charging area, the main thing needed is actually convenient land areas close to highways to setup a charging station. A present day gasoline station has the conveniences a person having to wait 20 minutes or more to charge their vehicles need, bathrooms, food and drinks.
Solar panel chargers set up to charge vehicles sitting at work sites would be no stress on the electrical system. A solar panel system at home would help take draws off the electrical system during the day to run home systems like air-conditioning. Being more decentralized in electricity production would help to allow the present system to not need huge upgrades to support an electric vehicle society.
This was great to see - thank you for responding to the comments. Some of the issues you brought up had a much better balance this time. Please take a look at RethinkX and respond to their analysis of this problem of economic cost and benefits of this transition.
A few points I'd like to make:
1) Electric vehicle costs are declining quickly and not increasing. As an example, Jim Farley's Ford has cut the price of the F150 pickup by roughly $10k US in the past week.
2) Maintenance costs for electric vehicles are significantly lower than internal combustion vehicles. This is proven across manufacturers and includes collision repair.
3) If you include oil and gas production as mineral extraction (which you should), electric vehicles require significantly less minerals. (Some simple math => 150,000 miles at 25 miles per gallon times 6 pounds per gallon equals 16.4 tons of fuel - none of which can be recycled).
Agreed...although I've read that Ford is losing $billions on its electric vehicles (but you gotta play the game!) and also that insurance companies are "totaling" Teslas for what otherwise would be repairable collision impacts.
10:00 OMG, they re-invented the trolleybus!
I remember those from my childhood in Brighton, UK! They would keep losing power when they went round corners and the power pickup lost contact with the overhead line. Or maybe I'm misrememberng - it was a loooong time ago.
Thanks for this video. I'm curious how much more effective it would be to simply change city design to allow for greener forms of transportation that are less expensive like cycling, walking or taking public transit. As well as making cities denser with more housing and shops closer together. This seems like a cheaper solution, so I'm curious how fast that would bring down emissions!
GREAT point, which is almost always overlooked in discussions of public policy. A corollary is that people won't willingly live in energy-efficient areas (i.e., dense cities) if those are not safe, pleasant, and affordable. Personally, I was raised in a large city and prefer it in many ways. I would much rather walk everywhere than drive everywhere. However, I live in a small suburban city because the large cities near me are unsafe, unpleasant, and unaffordable. I am sorry to say this, but the wealthier neighbors I have don't rob my house, steal my stuff, shoplift, carjack, join gangs, filth things up, ruin the schools, and overburden the safety net. I have to drive to everything, which I hate, but it's a great defense against undesirables. (BTW, this isn't closet racism. My neighborhood is very multi-racial. They're just not criminals and deadbeats. And yes, I recognize how classist that is. But when urban governments don't protect the productive people, they protect themselves by moving away. And that's a huge driver for carbon emissions, which liberals refuse to even discuss. And, to be politically balanced, part of the reason for large city failures has been off-shoring caused by not charging for carbon emissions and pollution by means of taxes and import duties, which conservatives refuse to even discuss.)
@@davidmackie3497 I'm with you. I live in a clean, quiet neighborhood in the suburbs, and I would rather die than live in a densely populated city with high crime.
Effective? Yes, there are way more effective ways to remodel our cities to allow for all kind of EVs (trams, trains, subway, bikes, scooters, bicycles) AND walkable ones at the cost of people's sanity, as you'd have to squeeze everyone together if you were to make everything walkable, you'd have to stack people on top of each other in smaller housing and tall towers.
Now, it's not realistic at all, i'd say it's even more unrealistic than anarchism and/or communism. We could make new cities based around that concept, but who would even move there in the first place? When the reason they've moved to the big cities is because everyone is there and everything they need is already there, despite how uncomfy it may be, so you'd have to forcefully evict and rehome everyone on the new comfortable and efficient city.
Changing cities to accomodate for better transportation and transit so people can use efficient EVs, public transport and still have all the vehicles needed to restock stores and deliver big objects or big amounts of materials to people's houses is outright impossible from an economic point of view. You would have to cut many roads to install trams, have lanes for public transports and you'd still need to have accessible roads for trucks everywhere to restock stores or to move furniture and other big stuff around.
@@davidmackie3497 :: Well, during the Pandemia we learned that some jobs can be done in home, at least partially. We have the roofs that are areas where we can place solar batteries, Public transportation can be upgraded and augmented, China, Australia and the USA had immense desert areas where solar (and wind) can generate electrical energy. The Sahara is also immense. Also, there is that concept of solar-wind chimneys that take advantage of the Mountains height to embed in them chimneyes that can be as high as one kilometer, the base-to-top differential in temperature and pressure can be used to generate electricity with turbines.
I have a Nissan Leaf 62 kWh now two years old.and has completed only 7000 miles. At first I got free charging from Tesco. When that programme finished I luckily had my Wallbox home charger installed. I rarely need to pay for charging away from home but I have an account PodPoint and carry an Electroverse card which I know for sure works with Shell cabinets. As I am disabled I also use a heavy Mobility Scooter about 15 miles per week - weather permitting. In my car boot I carry a folding power wheelchair which does only. 2 miles a month taking me into Supermarkets. I have an electric hoist to make light work of its stowage and deployment. To. Complete the picture I have an electric stairlift. For me the EV is great. I don’t need to pump smelly fuels and seldom venture more than 150 miles from home, I do not suffer from Range Anxiety but I do plan my more distant excursions using PodPoint Map and ZapMap to identify charging locations. The Tory supporting Press as hard at work decrying EVs. A retired neighbour enuir3 d about my car’s range. When I told him 180 to 220 miles he exclaimed nobody could go anywhere on that!
Thankyou for the better researched update. I initially commented on your original version saying how disappointed I was with the errors but then deleted my comment at that time ( my bad). I’m very pleased to be able to say ‘good job’ this time.
Oh and yes I am an EV driver here in the U.K. and I’m fortunate enough to be able to charge at home for 7.5pence per kW. on green energy.
I recently learned once a population reaches about 25% on acceptance of an idea the rest tend to follow.
"We talked about the hydrogen economy, the biggest problem beeing that it doesnt exist" amazing :D
Comparing the cost to replace the battery with the cost to replace the gas tank makes sense from a functional standpoint (both store energy), but not really from a cost of ownership standpoint. In an ICE vehicle, most of the major repair costs related to the drivetrain are due to engine malfunction. In an EV, the largest potential cost is due to the battery failure. Battery replacement for most EVs will still tend to be more expensive, but not by nearly so great a margin. The other factor to consider is how common battery failures are compared to major engine failures. I don't know the answer to that one.
At least a Tesla doesn't need to be serviced. Now running 3 years, without ANY service. Still going strong. The rest of the parts are equal cost or lower than ICE. So saying that EV er more expensive to repair, that's doesn't seem correct. Would like that @Sabine had used some documentation for this...
A few items to consider. The energy used to generate U.S. electricity is currently about the same order of magnitude as the total energy from gasoline and diesel for transportation. So it will be a huge challenge if we are to phase out generation from natural gas and coal and replace the electricity with generation from solar panels and wind turbines while steadily doubling the demand caused by converting to EV's. You did a good job highlighting the problems with infrastructure for charging and transmission. However, you could add more for sources of electricity. Current plans are to depend on solar panels (mostly from China) and wind turbines. However, solar panels only provide an average of 25% of rated capacity and wind turbines 35% compared to 94% for nuclear. The problem with solar panels is they don't work at night and work poorly in the morning, evening and when it is cloudy. Average demand for U.S. electricity is highest in August, but U.S. average generation from wind turbines is not only lowest in August, it is frequently lowest at mid day when electricity demand is highest. You mentioned that most people will likely charge their EV batteries at night. But if say 25-30% of our electricity comes from solar panels, that won't work. We might use wind turbines, but we would probably need 5-10 times the number calculated to meet average demands to account for the daily variability in the wind and solar panels only being effective about 6-8 hours per day. We might consider large banks of batteries. Iron flow batteries are a promising technology, but energy density is too low to be cost effective for cars. Iron is not toxic and does not burn like lithium does when exposed to water and iron is very abundant. But then there is the same question as we have for EV's about when to charge them. If the batteries are designed to be used at night when solar is not available, when do we charge the batteries? During the day won't work because demand is highest then unless we have a lot more solar panels, but then there is the liability on cloudy days. I built an economic model to represent 3 days of electricity supply and demand in 4 hour time slices. The only way I got utility scale batteries to be useful is to charge them during the day using electricity from the coal and natural gas plants that are supposed to be shut down. Nuclear should still be considered a clear option especially the Integral Fast Reactor designed by Argonne National Laboratory. They built a very effective one, but the program was cancelled for political reasons by President Clinton based on a strong push from John Kerry (our climate czar). This article is a good start. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integral_fast_reactor
I just listened to a TH-cam presentation from Peter Zeihn, discussing deep geothermal heat as a source for generating electricity. This source takes advantage of developments from shale oil technology. He pointed out that the footprint for shale oil sites is smaller and a new shale site can be in production in just a few weeks and costs less. In his presentation he reports that a pilot geothermal installation exists to prove the viability of the source. The advantage of deep geothermal heat is that this source is not subject to time of day or the weather. Therefore It can even be considered as a base load generator. If adopted country wide, depending on how it is implemented the need for transmission grid updates might be reduced. Every state would want one or more. One problem is the possibility of a paradigm shift from thinking big. Suppose the generator could fit into the area of a substation. (even if it could be used for very large generator equipment). With smaller generators, the impact of a network generator failure would be reduced. It would increase redundancy Deep heat is everywhere, and abundant. Would companies accept a smaller but more numerous generator environment? Probably not, just as legacy auto makers rejected single casting of the car body, until Tesla proved its power, and showed it possible. The human mind set beliefs are hard to change. It is easier to bring up objections because that is the way it has always been done.
Picked up a second hand leaf in the UK, 40,000 miles on the clock. It's great and I'm finding plenty of charging spots for my needs. I forgot to charge yesterday and drove to a rapid charger nearby and was able to get back to what I needed to in 3 minutes.
I also have an electric bike, and use that a lot for shopping and getting around. Though I'm sure living in the city helps a lot in my case.
If the UK had clean electrical production then it would be an ideal place for EV's...
As your travel distances are short with plenty of villages & towns in between long trips...
@@davidhollenshead4892 I mainly charge at home and use a green energy supplier, so even though technically the electricity I use isn't necessarily green I'm voting with my wallet for change, as much as can be.
You are 100% right though, this is something that really works for me in my specific case, hopefully as more modern EVs enter the second hand market it'll become more attainable for more people as the ranges increase.
I live in Ireland and drive an EV. Last year did three continental road trips and made it to Germany in all three. Great fun!
I would note a full switch to EVs would have some knock-on effects. No need for a lot of fuel delivery runs for instance. And it makes a stronger case for rooftop solar for many people.
yes, it is true. the drilling, processing, and distribution of oil already costs quite some energy that's saved when no one needs this anymore because everyone's charging at home. I've heard some people even say that about half of the energy used to charge an EV gets saved this way. not saying that this doesn't come with negative knock off-effects as well like the need for more power plants and the very expensive investment into a more capable power grid to handle the additional load.
@@HxTurtle though loads of batteries plugged into the grid can soak up excess power from solar/wind. I already do that at home with my panels.
@@KevinLyda this is true! you'd need to have a form of electronic communication with the grid operator. most people probably prefer to charge over night so it's ready for the morning.
ideally, it also serves as a stabilizing backup to cover peak demands. this sounds very good in theory, but I haven't seen much of this happening in the real world. unsure whether there's technical limitations; or people just unwilling to provide their expensive car battery for the common good. 🤷♂️
California definitely already runs into issues of having too much electricity generated during daytime from that solar roof mandate (paying Arizona to take some of their extra electricity.) but massively struggle to fulfill the overall demand (Diablo Canyon, cough.)
@@HxTurtle This is why some are pushing for workplace charging. Yes, EVs can flatten the demand curve at night which was great when we had a fossil fuel powered grid. But with a grid with lots of solar panels, we need more demand during the day. Workplace charging could deliver that.
So can electric school buses, electrified public transit, etc.
@@KevinLyda yes, that makes sense. it might be easier for the employer to provide the infrastructure necessary (you've one single point of construction required) than everyone doing something at home. it might also be easier to observe that no one abuses or pranks them charging vehicles (like it's easy to see with street side parking and charging during nighttimes.)
this could either be tax incentivised or an outright legal requirements for companies above a certain size to offer. ideally for free of charge so that more people feel to urge to capitalize from this fact.
yes, sounds doable. 👍
(especially when electricity is free at work, people won't charge up their vehicle unreasonably during night. just enough to make it to work.)
I drive a BEV here in NZ. LFP battery pack(BYD). The only time I ever use fast chargers is when I travel on holiday.
Plugging in at night is usually just part of my parking when I get home. (I use a bicycle for trips around town for shopping and recreation). With the conservative way I drive I get 480km on a full charge so range anxiety is non-existent. (20km travel per day usually, with 100km at most) Since I really only use an approximately 1.4kW charger I'm not feeling guilty about overloading the local grid. It never bothers me to just leave the car on charge at home as my car begins the nightly charging cycle during a 3 hours of free charging provided by my power payment plan. My employer also is happy to allow me to charge at work when I'm on the 100km days, it's much cheaper than petrol vouchers. It's all been about planning ahead and charging before I need it, so I don't need to worry about charging.
NZ generates at least 40% of it's power using renewables at present, my batteries contain no Ni or Co, and I've had almost no running costs in a year. (wiper fluid and an occasional fancy car-wash) So I'm not feeling very guilty. :)
Very informative video. Two points need coverage 1. Recycling of mountains of used batteries and its environmental impact. 2. This is relevant in countries of the third world- power theft, that will ruin utilities and also bring down the grid.
AS I mentioned on the first iteration: using my EV for 2,5 months now and had zero issues. I was always able to find charging stations fpr a reasonable price. I also did a trip over 1800km from southern Germany to Dresden, through Tzech Republic and back. Really nice driving. Only thing I have adjusted is my speed of travel as i ever go over 120km/h and most of the time drive 110km/h. Range anxiety has vanished with this trip too as it is nearly always possible to find a opportunity to recharge as the electrical grid is nearly everywhere.
The child laborers in the Congo who dug out the cobalt by hand that went into the EV batteries are happy that you're pleased with your car.
@@SurLaMer_ you don't even know if my car is running a battery with cobalt as there were already models in 2021 with alternatives: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithium_iron_phosphate_battery
But yeah just blame anyone with electric car xD Do you do this too under every apple/samsung keynote video? Burning more oil surely is not the way forward mate.
@@SurLaMer_ who dug up the cobalt used to extract the sulfur from the gasoline you use in your car? Happy miners on the moon or maybe those same child laborers in the Congo?
You know most EV batteries have very little cobalt in them, some have none. All gasoline and diesel production uses a boatload of cobalt for desulfurization
Yes I drive an electric vehicle, an ebike to be precise and i love it 😍and for longer trips I use public transport.
Make sure you park it outside away from anything flammable
@@Bryan-Hensley Make sure that you don't keep devices with Li-po batteries at home. Like phones, laptops, power banks and battery power tools...
I'm glad you pointed out the grid issue. Tesla power stations are at most buc-ees.
The issue with BMW drivers using Teslas is dangerous as they overheat the batteries.
Standard single phase residential voltage in the USA is 240v (effective average absolute potential) 60hz.
The way we reference it to the ground it alternates from -170v to +170v (peaks of sine wave), and so low power recepticals can operate at half potential, or 120v(average), by using either of the two legs with a ground conected neutral conductor. But in short all homes in the USA have 240v power, very old homes with non-electric heat having 100amp and most newer homes 200amp service.
(150 is common also in a few regions, and very large homes, those with a substantial workshop(welding and such) or sharing a connection with a commercial business will have 400amp)
A few appartment buildings use 208v/120v but that is a 3phase which is higher total power and they inherently have easy access to any other 3phase voltage, wye or delta up to ~13kV (the common streetside voltage and occationally used directly in heavy industry. Trunk distribution is 115kV up to 1000kV). In practice 480v/277v is very common, 600v in industrial settings and 4.2kV for special purposes.
I live in Scotland. Until April 2023 it was free to charge your car, in early 2023 getting a charger was becoming more and kore difficult as more and more people bought electric cars.
As of April 2023 you are now charged either 33p pkw or 50p pkw, depending on the charger.
Now all the charger stations are empty as it is cheaper to charge at home. If you have a jome charger installed for free by your power company, it will cost you 12p pkw. Far cheaper and no hunting around for a charging point. Clean air and fast than most petrol cars.
What really matters isn't range, it is sufficient range to do the next journey. For commercial vehicles there is an interesting business model being trialled in Australia, lorries with standard swappable batteries; the lorry doesn't charge its battery it goes to a swap station and in 5 minutes can have a fully charged battery put in. The transport company buys lorries without batteries and the charged battery is supplied as a service.
Electric lorries/trucks make sense. To move a large mass of cargo requires a large amount of torque at first movement. Electric motors generate torque at first movement, and without the need for gearbox transmission.
There is a hydrogen version of this where hydrogen is stored chemically bonded to some substance (can't recall what of course) in a canister that you swap out instead of pumping hydrogen into your tank, but with similar output as a pressurized tank. Sabine is too quick to dismiss H2 as an energy storage solution IMO. The same source energy issues she sites for H2 are also there for electric, but fails to compare them point by point. What matters are efficiency factors and the H2 people are quickly catching up.
Love my EV... bought a 1st gen Nissan Leaf... the most reliable and least expensive car I have ever owned... it is 12 years old now... still going strong... though has lost some range... but still plenty for running around town and is our daily driver... the only downside... it can no longer take us very far out of town... and my partner suffers from range anxiety... so we do have a second petrol car... but to be honest it mostly just sits in the driveway... serving to relieve my sweetie's anxiety by its presence... and despite rarely being driven, being a money pit... the electric car has been wonderful... no regrets...
we have a 2020 40kw leaf and love it. saves us a fortune on petrol servicing and road tax
Nissan leaf is what I almost bought used. Then I found out what it was going to cost to replace the battery, at only 90,000 miles. Turned me completely away from EVs. $14,000 for a battery that lasts 90,000 miles. I did some calculations and it was more economical to drive a vehicle getting 14 mpg. I now have two full size Chevy express vans that will travel 450 miles without refueling. Which only takes 5 minutes. I can even camp in them
I have a bycicle to go around the city - I live in a city with over 3M habitants. Cars themselves are the problem, they are responsible by enormous waste of space, energy and materials.
I recently bought a used 2012 leaf. the 50 mile range is far enough for my daily needs, but I am worried about the heater issues these early leafs had.
@@Bryan-Hensley The Leaf is regrettably infamous for poor battery life. Not only has the battery tech improved substantially since the Leaf hit the market, Nissan decided to rely on passive battery cooling to save costs. This turned out to be a huge mistake, as high battery temperatures murder those older cells. They STILL don't use active cooling, not even forced air. Everyone else uses at least forced air, or in most cases liquid cooling. For this reason alone I couldn't recommend a Leaf even brand new these days which is a shame because otherwise they're great.
Point being that the idea of having to spend umpteen-thousand-dollars on a new battery every few years is a myth based entirely on anti-EV FUD and, again regrettably, the Nissan Leaf...
Thanks Sabine, enjoyed the video. It's a bit of an uphill struggle to counter all the negative rubbish that's posted about ev's, like some of the comments below, but don't give up, the future is electric and all dinosaurs end up as fossils eventually. We are 7 years into ev motoring, now 100% electric transport with 2 vehicles refueled 90 % from a 16kw solar array, so not grid dependant. Something that wasn't mentioned is the huge amount of electricity used to refine fossil fuel, reduce this need and it can be used for cleaner transport.
Been driving a Tesla since 2018 for mostly work. Minimal costs for maintenance. Presently at 110,000 miles on this battery which has lost about 18% of its charging ability. Home is solar with batteries, so almost all of the charging is done at home with a level 2 charger. Very satisfied with this result as there are major savings on maintenance and energy even though the cost of the car was higher than average. I figure I have saved about $4-$5,000 per year with this form of transportation which will more than make up the cost of a new battery in the future. It is important to take into consideration the carbon footprint of all items that happen with the production and the maintenance of any vehicle and your analysis is appreciated. I will put one plug in to your take on the cost of agriculture as it probably only takes into consideration of the machinery. The real cost of agriculture must also add in all of the costs and not just the machinery. When that is done there is often a major change in the numbers which can markedly be affected by the global diet.
110 years ago, gas stations were rare
And should have stayed that way.
In 30 years they will be rare again.
In Australia, the biggest problem with EV uptake is cost. And we will very soon have EVs which cost the same or less than smelly cars. Many residences in Australia are detached houses with garages and 240v systems that can support a Type 2 charger charging at 7 kW per hour. More and more Australian houses are installing rooftop solar which can be used for daytime charging. EVs use less domestic energy than old electric hot water services and replacing old hot water services with heat pump systems would just about offset EVs. (The big electricity drain is air conditioning.)
Indeed. Here in Germany, electricity delivered through the public grid is actually going down, despite electric cars and electric heat pumps becoming more and more common. Because ... well, rooftop solar. Some supermarkets have started roofing their parking lots with solar panels, so customers keep their cars out of the sun and can charge a bit for free while shopping.
Not sure why Sabine found only sources expecting a need for big and expensive grid updates.
@@jemima_brown Doing a good guess on how much charge one needs per week is a good idea. If your commute is less than 20% of your EV's range, you can ride all 5 workdays from one charge and refill on the weekend. Also, kind employers have solar at their office/factory and allow to charge from that.
If all this fails, one can always fall back to charging from the grid, so no fear of stranding with empty batteries somewhere. Even with regularly charging a portion from the grid it's still a lot cheaper than gasoline/diesel.
@@jemima_brown You make good points. Home batteries at the moment are too small and expensive for EV charging at night. However, many people now work from home and even one hour of charging on a 7 kW charger will put about 40 km of range in an EV. Even if the family EV is not at home for charging during the day, solar can supply power for the house during the day and the EV can be charged at night; this can take much of the peak demand off the grid and remove the necessity for grid upgrades. Many businesses have large roof areas which could support panels for daytime charging of employee cars as an incentive for employees to work in the office.
@@traumflug Impressive. And yes, I think there are a number of smaller things such as solar panels, home batteries, reverse cycle air conditioners and heat pump hot water systems that can take pressure off the electricity systems.
@@traumflug Yes, I work on getting 40 km range per hour from my 7 kW Zappi charger.
I drive an electric vehicle already. It is a hyundai kona with 300 Km range. We use the car for 22.000 km a year. We live in a small town on the countryside of northern Germany. A lot of people go electric here.
I think there have been misconceptions of BEVs from the start. They thought of them as small vehicles for the city. But there is no charging infrastructure.
Here, on the countryside almoust everyone has a house and a parking space next to it. They all charge at home. Furthermore: almoust every household here has two or more cars, but no one needs them both to have 700 km range. So they often first change one of their cars to electric.
Our experience is: We rarely need a car with more than 300 km of range. We don´t care if we had to wait 30 minutes on a longe trip to recharge. On the other side we save a lot of money and time during normal working weeks with charging at home. We don´t miss the gas station. Also the comfort in an BEV is much higher, the music sounds better without engine noises.
Another problem in the US is that many like to do long road trips and a 10-min. gas refill every 300-350 miles is far preferable to a few hour recharge every 180-300 miles for them.
It is not correct to say that it takes a “few hours” to charge an EV on a road trip. In the US it is easy to drive a Tesla 200+ miles and then charge for less than a half an hour at a Tesla Supercharger. I know this because I’ve been doing it for a decade.
No one's perfect. Thanks for your work.
Thank you too!
Hi Sabine, Love your direct presentation style and balanced presentation of data.
The origin impetus for us buying our first EV, the Leaf, was to allow us to better benefit from the electricity our PV was generating rather than exporting it to the grid at a much lower rate than our imported electricity costs. We are presently upsizing our PV to allow us to satisfy the higher AC charging rate our Polestar will accept.
My point is that many EV owners either do, or aspire to, charging their vehicles from their own solar generation. Apart from the cost benefits there is also the advantage of knowing that their EV is using fully renewable fossil fuel free electricity, AKA running your EV on sunshine. Also in regard to the demand on grid infrastructure that you identify the charging of EVs from generation in the immediate vicinity (home or workplace) mitigates this grid demand.
In addition the adoption of V2G and V2H functionality will further buffer both peak grid demand and peak daytime generation from PV which it is used as the charging source.
Much has been said by futurists such as Tony Seba in this regard and on the changing ways we will source energy and the uses we will put it to in the coming decades. EVs are just part of a much wider network that will change hugely in the coming years.
I think most people believe they will charge their EV via an electrical socket off the grid (with many here still stating "oh 100% efficient magic from that socket"); but perhaps "aspire to the off the grid existence" I do think sounds so doable - but I used to read Popular Science and such in the old days and they made moon bases seem so easy and doable too, and sure many will say that is still true but it is so expensive and a long path of .. if there are not other variable such as world events and bad behaviors taking place.
Solar generation is idiotic..
Are you familiar with the principle of One way energy entanglement?
Another Scam, pushed by the elites, they think they're special,!
Model YLR owner i charge off my solar panels. I have not payed anything for elect for 6 years. My solar gives back in the day time and helps the grid. I plug in at night and start charging at 12 AM this helps the utility balance the load and helps wast by ramping up in the day and down at night.
@@billthompson9482 Yeah.. No, your solar array doesn't "help the grid" it just passes your bills to the rest of society..
I drive a plug-in hybrid car and find that it is perfect for a small city. The approximate 35 km electric range from charging at home takes me anywhere in the city the next day. I rarely need to fill with gas, but never have "range anxiety". As a bonus, I love the smoothness, quietness, and strong torque of the electric motor.
Great video and analysis of the problems with the role out of electric vehicles. Would love to also see a spotlight done on the lack of technology in regards to recycling electric cars once their lifespan is over and a comparative analysis of electric car lifespan to internal combustion car lifespan.
I appreciate the corrected video, und MEHR SABINE/SWTG IST IMMER GUT!
Been driving an EV for quite a few years now. They are excellent for daily commuter use, and very competitive even for long road trips (my longest single day drive was about 900 miles/1450km). We have chargers at our house and that's super convenient too. I really like NEVER having to go to a gas/petrol station.
We had quite similar positive experiences with our EV, driven since 2016 already.
In New Zealand, BP is a significant player, but not the biggest, in providing charge points at each petrol station (or working on it anyway). I stop there for a quick get me home charge in my leaf sometimes. They charge 3x the market rate per unit or kWh, but that's good... There are free chargers around, but everyone queues for those. Not for the pay stations.
Remember, you only have to recharge what you used. If you only drive 40km in a day, that's 3 hours on a slow home charge outlet, without any special wiring.
Thanks for your videos. I now drive an BEV and I can tell you it is like night and day. I love it. Btw, range anxiety is charge anxiety. And it only can happen on road trips beecause most of us charge at home. In any case, it doesn't bother me at all, just requires slightly more thought and planning when doing road trips.
I run a phev. I have a long commute but even so it manages 65 to 80km per litter of fuel. Cold weather reduced efficiency. PHEV make the most sense at present whilst we build grid and charging capacity. My experience is that a prius phv uses 1/10th of the fuel used for a smaller Mazda demio. Where I live most people would not commute as far as I do and the grid is 90% renewable.
It seems strange that we don't extoll the phv as the ideal right now.
The fact that I didn't notice any mistakes in the first video serves as a reminder not to blindly trust _all_ the brilliant and funny theoretical physicists we're subscribed to... 😎
Trusting Sabine, as this update shows, is the best
It was mostly outdated information. Which is kinda understandable. If you find numbers in astrophysics from 5 years ago, they don't suddenly be wrong, if you find numbers regarding EVs from 5 years ago, those are garbage now.
Contemporary design is focussing on prestige cars requiring more power long range capability. A different mind set is required. It's not just about transportation.
I've been driving my first electric car (Kia eNiro) since just over 2 years. Wouldn't go back to an ICE. Solar charging at home 80% for local/regional driving, 20% charging on the road for long drives. The infrastructure is getting better, and we are getting better at dealing with any issues. I keep on trying to promote adoption amongst friends, with some success. Living near Munich.
Hi Sabine,
Ok, if you generate power from renewables, then you reduce emissions by some amount, as long as you invest uncountable fantasticillions into the grid etc. There is not enough Lithium being mined for all of these countries that propose to ban the sale of ICE vehicles by 203x. And there are not enough mines on the drawing board to satisfy the demand, so we better hope that the alternative battery technology is scaled up and put into production real quick.
And while we are at it, can we also get to work on battery recycling plants! A lot of expensive lithium is already going to landfill - at least in Australia, where currently, we only recycle ~8% of lithium batteries. Start adding lots of EV batteries being scrapped and we have a big environmental problem.
If we actually wanted to reduce emissions, using the lithium we have for home batteries combined with rooftop solar makes far more sense and will offset a lot more carbons. Replacing an ICE traffic jam with an EV traffic jam makes little or no sense, we would be better of redesigning our cities and using eBikes.
Yes, we know that Australia is clueless about everything. So what? :-)