Very much the dilemma of luminance. The brighter something is, the easier it is to see...which is sort of an obvious statement I know. The kicker here is that 'Planet 9' might also be a small black hole. Then no telescope will see it.
What if we are looking for the wrong thing? Can it be a tiny black hole? Five times the size of earth means about 4.5cm radius. Really, really hard to detect it.
I think it will need the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) to confirm its existence. Reason: it can find the object without the interference effects of the Earth's atmosphere.
JWST studies mostly in IR. Its capabilities will be largely useless in attempting to find the planet. That said, once the planet has been found, it might be useful. Its limit on the visual spectrum is about 2.3 times that of Hubble's, so it's an alternative to visual study of the planet if it's found (or if it takes too long, the only viable space telescope with which to do so if Hubble is no longer in service)
where have you been for the last 8/9 years? Myself and 7other's around the globe spotted 9/ Nibaru" 8 almost 9 years ago. And to be honest, by our calculations it is out of control so to speak. And it's gotten closer and closer on an unpredictable course but then several months pass and it's correct in trajectory??? We would very much like to know what you all know! Very soon. It's as if this monstrous planet could actually be on a collision course with eigther the sun or earth. Please tell us what's up!!
You should consider they might find as many new planets as there are old ones . One is the supposed mars sized planet 10 but planet 9 might have had dislodged all planets in it orbit so if there are 11 and 12 they are even further out
That is what I believe. If you look at most of our direct images of other solar systems, you see all these far AU large planets making up the majority of what we can see only because we can't see the inner solar systems of these other stars. In our system its the opposite. We can see all the inner planets but not the high AU planets because of our vantage point.
We are only able to detect larger planets, that’s why there are so many more “super earths” and large planets found. There are just as many earth size and smaller planets, we just can’t see them well with the current technology.
Great video. Only one mistake. The final images of rocky exoplanets do not correspond to the expected composition of planet 9. Planet 9 is a mini Neptune, so probably it is full of gas, followed by ice and silicate with a rocky core deep inside.
3:17 Wasn't Pluto reclassified because it had not cleared out all the debry from its orbital path like the other planets have? I thought that was the one criteria that it did not met 🤔
Yep, that was the bit they added to specifically eliminate Pluto and Ceres as planets. Problem is Earth hasn't technically cleared its orbit either. Still a lot of large Near Earth Objects in our path.
@@BLACKLIGHT_NL and Jupiter dosen't orbit "the sun". It orbits a barricenter which is outside "the sun". And actually, "the sun" is not the official name of our central star. It doesn't really have one, though on most astronomical applications its labeled as "Sol". The definition was rushed and not well thought out.
To all Pluto lover friends: Evolve with science and more discoveries, don’t get stuck in a point in time. if Pluto is considered a planet, we would have a lot of planets since more objects are discovered that are like Pluto and larger than Pluto
@@JOhnDoe-nl4wj And i know a scenario where this is a possibility. A world war, where every nation will attack the satelites of the other nation. There are no agreements really. And if this will happen then the Kessler syndrome might become a reality super quick. Because i dont think China for example would hold back on destroying satelites which are giving crucial informations about positions of equipment and such.
Starlink, will be launched to low orbit. So, it would be a HINDRANCE or BARRIER, that it would.BLOCK the new propsosed SPACE TELESCOPE to be LAUNCHED since it will be LAUNCH to the HIGHER ORBIT area
@@aarondizor1069 check this info i have found in a comm at another video on topic - is like the glasses on the nose, are so many photos of its entire system... Back in Time Vega was the North star in the days of Giza! With knowing that information and the belief that Vega will once again be our North star after the next pass when the poles are flip back, gave the obvious implication that the fiery dragon is in orbiting from Lyra! Anyone interested you can can find it using stellarium and this information: Right Ascension: 23m 34s Declination: +33° 13’ 19” Galactic Longitude: 66.06° Galactic Latitude: 8.38° Constellation: Lyra GLIESE 758 HR 7368
about 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 planets although, not counting planets without suns and only counting for the observable universe as of now we found 4,108 exoplanets so far (+ our own 8)
@@JOhnDoe-nl4wj do you think there may be multiverses? I do lol say someone took a trip to the observable universe if he had that tech just to see I bet there would be another universe why would there be nothing you know if there is that would be crazy af or maybe another universe may be so far couldn’t see it idk lol im high
@@PieRatedGFX mayy you explain more because In our universe we know for sure there are 3… maybe 11 and explain why we couldn’t see it wouldn’t we be able to see universes with the same laws as ours wouldn’t we see some things? Or you saying it would be maybe timeless or basically a empty void of space and time ?
We have been told of the existence of another mysterious planet in our solar system since ancient times but many scientists namely David Morrison from NASA were dismissive of this idea. I can't help but feel that it is quite arrogant and narrow-minded of us to assume that our ancestors always know less than we do.
Mostly we can't see planets around other stars. We infer that they are there by observing the Doppler shift in the spectra of their stars. Sort of the way you can tell a cop car is passing your house by the siren pitch going high to low. Even if you can't see it from inside your bathroom....
The vast majority of exoplanets discovered to date were not found through direct imaging. Even when direct imaging is possible, the exoplanet shows up as a pixelated dot, far too small for any meaningful details to be revealed. However, we know where to look to find exoplanets, but we only have a general area as to where planet 9 could possibly be found. Current telescopes would be able to detect planet 9 assuming we knew exactly where to look, but there lies the problem.
@@matthewmenchaca5686 naah... it is like the glasses on the nose - check here Back in Time Vega was the North star in the days of Giza! With knowing that information and the belief that Vega will once again be our North star after the next pass when the poles are flip back, gave the obvious implication that the fiery dragon is in orbiting from Lyra! Anyone interested you can can find it using stellarium and this information: Right Ascension: 23m 34s Declination: +33° 13’ 19” Galactic Longitude: 66.06° Galactic Latitude: 8.38° Constellation: Lyra GLIESE 758 HR 7368
Still thought to be outside Neptune, maybe crossing its orbit slightly. But Brown felt that 5 gas giants in one system always simulates to one being kicked out.
the one thing that's illogical with most science fiction movies are that every planet has inhabitants when in fact, most are just a lump of natural disasters with no living object
not my info, but i kept it because i see it in my skies and i have photos of it. Back in Time Vega was the North star in the days of Giza! With knowing that information and the belief that Vega will once again be our North star after the next pass when the poles are flip back, gave the obvious implication that the fiery dragon is in orbiting from Lyra! Anyone interested you can can find it using stellarium and this information: Right Ascension: 23m 34s Declination: +33° 13’ 19” Galactic Longitude: 66.06° Galactic Latitude: 8.38° Constellation: Lyra GLIESE 758 HR 7368
Using the wrong instrument to find it like a giant camera where the light is extremely dim! should be using some form of radar rather than a light based system would yield results...
Any planet in trans-neptunian orbit is in unstable orbit and the moment it enters Sun's heliosheath, it will glow brightly and become a comet causing chaos and will be captured into stable equatorial orbit around Sun.
You can't see it because it could be a small singularity or a dense stellar core black burnt out or a piece of it or lets imagine every object of density it could be besides a planet
They are just dragging this thing on and on as long as they possibly can, before forced to go public at some point. It's what the authorities do, is it not?
Something has been bothering me about looking for a faint object with a 20,000 year orbit. This video talks mainly about magnitude. What about the issue of relative movement. It seems to me that this TNO would spend thousands of years moving in a direction across the field of view of someone on earth, so slowly, that the issue of magnitude is comparatively minor. In my mind this issue should be discussed in interviews such as this one, in an effort to manage expectations. Perhaps its relative position as earth moves around the sun would be more meaningful than movement over a period of one hour.
while it has a longer orbital duration of 10 to 20 thousand years. it also covers a lot more distance. With an orbit 20 times bigger than neptune, which covers 28.27 billion km in 165 years with 5.43 km/s, Planet X would need to cover 565.49 billion km in 10,000 to 20,000 years. This translates to 0.9 to 1.8 km/s average orbital speed. Which would be uniform with Kepler's Law.
Anyone interested you can can find it using stellarium and this information: Right Ascension: 23m 34s Declination: +33° 13’ 19” Galactic Longitude: 66.06° Galactic Latitude: 8.38° Constellation: Lyra GLIESE 758 HR 7368
At a certain angle of the orbits it almost resembles the eye of ra. In Egyptian heiroglyphs. Makes one wonder if that's the reference we use to find the other planet/s.
Instead of wasting time and resources scanning this "large swathe of sky" wouldn't it be easier to send a telescope to land on Pluto or another tno and observe from that perspective rather than trying to look from a trajectory view or our distant view??
I assume planet x or 9 is only one of many bigger object out there -all those that didnt get ejected completely when the sun were created are still out there .If earth had thea to collide with and every planet has one or two theas but they got ejected but in orbit still - Is the count on mars+ sized planets same as the numbers in the solar system or greater ( could be)
An then we get to see that this will probably end up being the next gen of prob or hobble type telescope in space an combined with the Rubin etc will deffently help speed up information an processing of it too. Cant wait to see it.
As others have undoubtedly noticed, the solar system animation in the opening sequence is weird ... the large outer planet moving faster in its circular orbit than the planets closer to the sun! That's a violation of the laws of physics.
According to Indian astronomy there are two planets which couldn't see one is rahu and other one is kethu. I think these are black holes. One is our galaxy massive black hole (Rahu) other one may be small black hole near to our solar system (kethu).
Seems as though if a planet 9 exists it could be found by looking at stars that changed brightness Over a lengthy time the change in star brightness would be in a line that would be the planets otbit. There are probably star chart photos that go back 70 or more years to compare.
Planet 9 is still called Pluto, so if you are looking for something new it will be planet 10. 11, 12 and so on. I think it will take many more years to understand how our galaxy works.
The statement that because most stars have super earth therefore our sun should also have one was quite a stretch. Can you say there is another star just like us where there are three inner planets exactly in the same spot as us and there's Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune and Pluto? Of course not.
Might it's estimated 20.000 years orbit, cause any detectable anomaly in the fossil record? Something related with sun brightness, or tidal forces... Just a guess Thank you for the video
Planet nine and sister planets and moons plus a huge debris field on a highly elliptical orbit is supposed to come very close to Earth after being sling shot out after orbiting the sun on this next Passover.
I thought the existence of planet 9 was debunked a while ago. Other factors besides a hypothetical giant planet can explain the orbital anomalies of the Trans-Neptunians.
try this... Anyone interested you can find it using stellarium and this information: Right Ascension: 23m 34s Declination: +33° 13’ 19” Galactic Longitude: 66.06° Galactic Latitude: 8.38° Constellation: Lyra GLIESE 758 HR 7368
We found the newest 3 planets only recently like Uranus was only found in 1781 and Pluto only in 1930 around the time that certain German President was ruling
Ya know, if Nibiru is really out there and it was found to be on its way, do you really think they would release that information? No They would not. Because that knowledge people would freak out. They would demand something be done to save them. People wouldn't work, pay taxes and chaos would ensue.
That cat be chillin tho
it gave me smiles
I miss the simpler times when Pluto was a planet
It still is
@@avus-kw2f213 It's not. There's a ton of pluto-like objects in our solar system, we'd end up with wayy too many planets
@@sopwafel Pluto is a dwarf planet, it literally has the word planet in it's type.
@@sopwafel they are not planet not because we found too much, it's because they are a dwarf planet
@@___6___6__six40 and it also has the word "dwarf" in it. is it hard to understand?
All in favour of naming Planet 9 'Waldo'
I second this motion
I see what you did there. The idea has merit 😁
I believe there's a name for that planet already, it's called planet X.
@@gabrielung4088 yeah it is creative lol but planet X already took it 😂😂
@@LOTStreets You didn't get the joke did ya
Great interview. Professor Batygin is a great educator.
Telescope: See millions and billions of light years away
Also telescope: Can’t see something much much closer
Very much the dilemma of luminance. The brighter something is, the easier it is to see...which is sort of an obvious statement I know. The kicker here is that 'Planet 9' might also be a small black hole. Then no telescope will see it.
@@WestOfEarth i think my girlfriend might also be a small black hole, I can’t seem to see her😂
What if we are looking for the wrong thing? Can it be a tiny black hole? Five times the size of earth means about 4.5cm radius. Really, really hard to detect it.
As the phrase goes however, “when you hear hooves think horses not zebras” A black hole seems unlikely. Like how would it get there?
@@thomasjones4893
Planet 9 was unlikely about 10 years ago.
@@abseiduk 10 years ago? Not even a couple years. It's planet X and it's coming to destroy us
Then it would probably evaporate because of hawking radiation, idk
Unlikley
I think it will need the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) to confirm its existence. Reason: it can find the object without the interference effects of the Earth's atmosphere.
I can't wait for them to launch it
JWST studies mostly in IR. Its capabilities will be largely useless in attempting to find the planet. That said, once the planet has been found, it might be useful. Its limit on the visual spectrum is about 2.3 times that of Hubble's, so it's an alternative to visual study of the planet if it's found (or if it takes too long, the only viable space telescope with which to do so if Hubble is no longer in service)
it`s launched!
please see my earlier comment.
where have you been for the last 8/9 years? Myself and 7other's around the globe spotted 9/ Nibaru" 8 almost 9 years ago. And to be honest, by our calculations it is out of control so to speak. And it's gotten closer and closer on an unpredictable course but then several months pass and it's correct in trajectory??? We would very much like to know what you all know! Very soon. It's as if this monstrous planet could actually be on a collision course with eigther the sun or earth. Please tell us what's up!!
3 gigapixel camera the size of a car, is pretty insane
That'll be in our phones in 10 years.
@@JJs_playground probably
@@JJs_playground definitely possible considering a 200 megapixel smartphone camera is just around the corner
You should consider they might find as many new planets as there are old ones . One is the supposed mars sized planet 10 but planet 9 might have had dislodged all planets in it orbit so if there are 11 and 12 they are even further out
That is what I believe. If you look at most of our direct images of other solar systems, you see all these far AU large planets making up the majority of what we can see only because we can't see the inner solar systems of these other stars. In our system its the opposite. We can see all the inner planets but not the high AU planets because of our vantage point.
Is nice camera, but does it have portrait mode for selfies?
Yeah but you gotta extend your arm really far
If Planet 9 does in fact exist, what would you name it?
Urectum
Pluto
Pluto 2
Ix (like the roman numeral 'IX' for 9)
Bloomberg 🪐
We are only able to detect larger planets, that’s why there are so many more “super earths” and large planets found. There are just as many earth size and smaller planets, we just can’t see them well with the current technology.
Great video. Only one mistake. The final images of rocky exoplanets do not correspond to the expected composition of planet 9. Planet 9 is a mini Neptune, so probably it is full of gas, followed by ice and silicate with a rocky core deep inside.
It's full of convenient mistakes.
3:17 Wasn't Pluto reclassified because it had not cleared out all the debry from its orbital path like the other planets have? I thought that was the one criteria that it did not met 🤔
Yep, that was the bit they added to specifically eliminate Pluto and Ceres as planets. Problem is Earth hasn't technically cleared its orbit either. Still a lot of large Near Earth Objects in our path.
@@colleenforrest7936 haha so lol earth is not a planet? 🤔
@@BLACKLIGHT_NL and Jupiter dosen't orbit "the sun". It orbits a barricenter which is outside "the sun".
And actually, "the sun" is not the official name of our central star. It doesn't really have one, though on most astronomical applications its labeled as "Sol".
The definition was rushed and not well thought out.
@@colleenforrest7936 haha wow 🤔 I hope the earth is still round, might need to start questioning that also. Thanks mate learned something today 👌🏻
@@BLACKLIGHT_NL it's more of an ovoid
To all Pluto lover friends: Evolve with science and more discoveries, don’t get stuck in a point in time. if Pluto is considered a planet, we would have a lot of planets since more objects are discovered that are like Pluto and larger than Pluto
I don't understand why ppl are still upset about Pluto 😂
It's just a classification... Pluto doesn't care
@Jacus Szewczyk it's an object without any thoughts or emotions... It doesn't care what do we classify it as. Duhh
@Jacus Szewczyk how do you know he cares did you ask him ? lol
@@bhuvaneshs.k638 it's moon Charon literally has 'care' in it's name
@@Freshbott2 charon is no moon, charon and pluto are a binary dwarf planet system
lol
Planet 9 is 30 degrees below the "Orion" constellation closest to Betelgeuse & Saiph. I also have video on it through my telescope....this page.
One of my concerns is that starlink satellites ruin all images that this telescope takes
i'd be more afraid of burned aluminum oxide in the atmosphere or kessler syndrome
@@JOhnDoe-nl4wj And i know a scenario where this is a possibility. A world war, where every nation will attack the satelites of the other nation. There are no agreements really. And if this will happen then the Kessler syndrome might become a reality super quick.
Because i dont think China for example would hold back on destroying satelites which are giving crucial informations about positions of equipment and such.
Starlink, will be launched to low orbit. So, it would be a HINDRANCE or BARRIER, that it would.BLOCK the new propsosed SPACE TELESCOPE to be LAUNCHED since it will be LAUNCH to the HIGHER ORBIT area
@@aarondizor1069 check this info i have found in a comm at another video on topic - is like the glasses on the nose, are so many photos of its entire system...
Back in Time Vega was the North star in the days of Giza!
With knowing that information and the belief that Vega will once again be our North star after the next pass when the poles are flip back,
gave the obvious implication that the fiery dragon is in orbiting from Lyra!
Anyone interested you can can find it using stellarium and this information:
Right Ascension: 23m 34s
Declination: +33° 13’ 19”
Galactic Longitude: 66.06°
Galactic Latitude: 8.38°
Constellation: Lyra
GLIESE 758
HR 7368
Flat earthers would be asking "what southern sky?"
Just an up side down basement of the flat earth...
They be pretending that flat earth exist to calm themselves
@Jupiter rules bro do you feel trippy after taking those psychidelic shrooms
@Jupiter rules wouldn't eclipses (solar and lunar) scare you?
@Jupiter rules weird when flat earthers only have cartoons of the "true form" of the earth
Planet 9 is otherwise known as Niburu. It is on a 3000 year orbit and was last here during the time of Moses. Expect it soon.
There are so many planets out there that we may never discover.
about 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 planets
although, not counting planets without suns
and only counting for the observable universe
as of now we found 4,108 exoplanets so far (+ our own 8)
@@JOhnDoe-nl4wj do you think there may be multiverses? I do lol say someone took a trip to the observable universe if he had that tech just to see I bet there would be another universe why would there be nothing you know if there is that would be crazy af or maybe another universe may be so far couldn’t see it idk lol im high
@@marioramon682 If there are multiverse, you can't observe them from any POV as each one will be separate by different dimensions.
@@PieRatedGFX mayy you explain more because In our universe we know for sure there are 3… maybe 11 and explain why we couldn’t see it wouldn’t we be able to see universes with the same laws as ours wouldn’t we see some things? Or you saying it would be maybe timeless or basically a empty void of space and time ?
We have been told of the existence of another mysterious planet in our solar system since ancient times but many scientists namely David Morrison from NASA were dismissive of this idea. I can't help but feel that it is quite arrogant and narrow-minded of us to assume that our ancestors always know less than we do.
I vote for this 9th planed being called Pluto II
Yes please!
Plutwo
I vote for calling it Planet X
Every science human: “You can use math to discover planets”
Planet 9: “You need poetry to discover me.”
lol
I hope the planet is rad.
Isn't it funny that we can see planets and stars from different solar systems far away, but not the ninth planet from our own solar system.
Mostly we can't see planets around other stars.
We infer that they are there by observing the Doppler shift in the spectra of their stars.
Sort of the way you can tell a cop car is passing your house by the siren pitch going high to low.
Even if you can't see it from inside your bathroom....
The vast majority of exoplanets discovered to date were not found through direct imaging. Even when direct imaging is possible, the exoplanet shows up as a pixelated dot, far too small for any meaningful details to be revealed. However, we know where to look to find exoplanets, but we only have a general area as to where planet 9 could possibly be found. Current telescopes would be able to detect planet 9 assuming we knew exactly where to look, but there lies the problem.
To think in our lifetime we lost a planet and gained a continent without any cataclysmic event happening.
『sOcIaL cOnStRuCtS』
@taladuga picpwaspwat Zealandia
@taladuga picpwaspwat zealandia the sunken continent
So just a few years and we’ll know
Unless we need another telescope…
We’re probably gonna need a telescope 10x larger then that one there😂
Well, will they want more tax money?
@@brianroberts5740 Who? Elon? No
@@matthewmenchaca5686 naah... it is like the glasses on the nose - check here
Back in Time Vega was the North star in the days of Giza!
With knowing that information and the belief that Vega will once again be our North star after the next pass when the poles are flip back,
gave the obvious implication that the fiery dragon is in orbiting from Lyra!
Anyone interested you can can find it using stellarium and this information:
Right Ascension: 23m 34s
Declination: +33° 13’ 19”
Galactic Longitude: 66.06°
Galactic Latitude: 8.38°
Constellation: Lyra
GLIESE 758
HR 7368
funny how we can find things billions of light years away but Planet X and Planet 9 are still hiding in our back yard.
I am wondering how close would be the Planet 9 to Sun at its perihelion: 120-150 AU ?
Still thought to be outside Neptune, maybe crossing its orbit slightly. But Brown felt that 5 gas giants in one system always simulates to one being kicked out.
240 AU, according to the estimates made in the most recent paper
Great educational presentation thanks for this.
I wonder if there’s anything that happens on earth on a 20,000 year cycle
If I find Planet IX, I'll name it Hades because of Nibiru's legends
I do 20 Terrabytes, on the daily, Son!
-Dave Chappelle
i like how he pronounced uranus different the way its supposed to be pronounced
Great video! Thanks
the one thing that's illogical with most science fiction movies are that every planet has inhabitants when in fact, most are just a lump of natural disasters with no living object
I love cell phones. Thanks for actually making them for me. It allows me to see without moving around.
not my info, but i kept it because i see it in my skies and i have photos of it.
Back in Time Vega was the North star in the days of Giza!
With knowing that information and the belief that Vega will once again be our North star after the next pass when the poles are flip back, gave the obvious implication that the fiery dragon is in orbiting from Lyra!
Anyone interested you can can find it using stellarium and this information:
Right Ascension: 23m 34s
Declination: +33° 13’ 19”
Galactic Longitude: 66.06°
Galactic Latitude: 8.38°
Constellation: Lyra
GLIESE 758
HR 7368
4:44 On average, we are too primitive at the moment to find anything but the biggest exoplanets. Your statistics are skewed.
Using the wrong instrument to find it like a giant camera where the light is extremely dim! should be using some form of radar rather than a light based system would yield results...
Would take 20 years to get an image back from something 10 light-years away.
What Greek/Roman name that's not been used on any drawf planet/exoplanet can we use for Planet X?
Any planet in trans-neptunian orbit is in unstable orbit and the moment it enters Sun's heliosheath, it will glow brightly and become a comet causing chaos and will be captured into stable equatorial orbit around Sun.
Orbit kontol planet mana ada orbit, planet mengambang di alam semesta
“Told y’all bout this on Nibiru!” - - Ab-Soul
You can't see it because it could be a small singularity or a dense stellar core black burnt out or a piece of it or lets imagine every object of density it could be besides a planet
Is the object in question, inside or outside the oort cloud?
Nibiru is coming
20 Terra bytes!! That’s massive
and is not alone, there is a system of 8 planets with specific colors and paterns and have moons, we have photos of them...
Nicely Explained 👍👍
It’s already referred to in mythology as Nibiru
They are just dragging this thing on and on as long as they possibly can, before forced to go public at some point. It's what the authorities do, is it not?
Uranus never lets me down.
Incredible Thing
Something has been bothering me about looking for a faint object with a 20,000 year orbit. This video talks mainly about magnitude. What about the issue of relative movement. It seems to me that this TNO would spend thousands of years moving in a direction across the field of view of someone on earth, so slowly, that the issue of magnitude is comparatively minor. In my mind this issue should be discussed in interviews such as this one, in an effort to manage expectations. Perhaps its relative position as earth moves around the sun would be more meaningful than movement over a period of one hour.
They literally mentioned this concern near the later half of the video.
$20,000 year orbit is horrendous
while it has a longer orbital duration of 10 to 20 thousand years. it also covers a lot more distance.
With an orbit 20 times bigger than neptune, which covers 28.27 billion km in 165 years with 5.43 km/s, Planet X would need to cover 565.49 billion km in 10,000 to 20,000 years.
This translates to 0.9 to 1.8 km/s average orbital speed. Which would be uniform with Kepler's Law.
As of November 18, 2021, Planet 9 has been said to be discovered! BTW it was discovered in 1983.
Back in my day, we already had 9 planets.
not anymore
200 years ago we had 11...
There is the possibility, as history has told this planet is inhabited with an advanced race of being, maybe they just don’t want to be found
Anyone interested you can can find it using stellarium and this information:
Right Ascension: 23m 34s
Declination: +33° 13’ 19”
Galactic Longitude: 66.06°
Galactic Latitude: 8.38°
Constellation: Lyra
GLIESE 758
HR 7368
At a certain angle of the orbits it almost resembles the eye of ra. In Egyptian heiroglyphs. Makes one wonder if that's the reference we use to find the other planet/s.
Some don't mention poor old Pluto anymore, as if it has been wiped from existence.
Instead of wasting time and resources scanning this "large swathe of sky" wouldn't it be easier to send a telescope to land on Pluto or another tno and observe from that perspective rather than trying to look from a trajectory view or our distant view??
@@joshualangford2464 it's too cold and dark for the technology we have but if it's a nuclear rover maybe it's easier
Welcome to the whacky world of cancel culture. Hence, Planet X.
We'll try southern hemisphere later.
You will always be number 9 Pluto. 💛
Could it be all the objects in the Kuiper belt is what's influencing not a planet x?
I assume planet x or 9 is only one of many bigger object out there -all those that didnt get ejected completely when the sun were created are still out there .If earth had thea to collide with and every planet has one or two theas but they got ejected but in orbit still - Is the count on mars+ sized planets same as the numbers in the solar system or greater ( could be)
An then we get to see that this will probably end up being the next gen of prob or hobble type telescope in space an combined with the Rubin etc will deffently help speed up information an processing of it too. Cant wait to see it.
Thank you 🙏
Planets around other stars are easier to find than a planet in our solar system 🤔
Wants to find new planets*
There are new planets at home.
*the new planets at home
As others have undoubtedly noticed, the solar system animation in the opening sequence is weird ... the large outer planet moving faster in its circular orbit than the planets closer to the sun!
That's a violation of the laws of physics.
According to Indian astronomy there are two planets which couldn't see one is rahu and other one is kethu. I think these are black holes. One is our galaxy massive black hole (Rahu) other one may be small black hole near to our solar system (kethu).
20TB per night?! What kinda of storage array are you talking about?!
A pretty big one
Look to the lower south to southwest horizon around 36 to 40 degrees..
Im make myself a 20 " telescope and start looking for it myself here in the mountains of Costa Rica, wish me luck guys.
Sorry, imeant I will.
Maybe planet 9 is Niburu after all? ;)
Only if it's hurtling towards earth for a second run.
if annunakis are real...
'A new planet will be heard before it is seen. This is a prophesy. ' - HPB circa 1860
Lloyd Pye talked about the 9th planet for a long time! RIP
So basically Neptune and the nineth are like Heisenberg's uncertainty 😂
Don't bother...they found it years ago it's behind the sun.
Seems as though if a planet 9 exists it could be found by looking at stars that changed brightness Over a lengthy time the change in star brightness would be in a line that would be the planets otbit. There are probably star chart photos that go back 70 or more years to compare.
You're Pluto when your crush is still looking for the right person.
They know exactly where it is , 💯
Planet 9 is still called Pluto, so if you are looking for something new it will be planet 10. 11, 12 and so on.
I think it will take many more years to understand how our galaxy works.
Could planet nine cause the great flood from history ?
Could the hemisphere be effecting the orbit of uranus
The statement that because most stars have super earth therefore our sun should also have one was quite a stretch. Can you say there is another star just like us where there are three inner planets exactly in the same spot as us and there's Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune and Pluto? Of course not.
Planet 9 guys :- it's out there we are about to find it
Northern Hemisphere :- Ahem... 😆
We already did. It's called Pluto.
@@ivandinsmore6217 i think.. no.
Might it's estimated 20.000 years orbit, cause any detectable anomaly in the fossil record? Something related with sun brightness, or tidal forces...
Just a guess
Thank you for the video
Some have suggested planet 9 could be a microscopic black hole. If it is true, it would be even more difficult to find.
Planet nine and sister planets and moons plus a huge debris field on a highly elliptical orbit is supposed to come very close to Earth after being sling shot out after orbiting the sun on this next Passover.
If they don't name it Erectum I will be very dissapointed.
This is interesting. But it’s more fascinating when you’re high
I thought the existence of planet 9 was debunked a while ago. Other factors besides a hypothetical giant planet can explain the orbital anomalies of the Trans-Neptunians.
just because it 'can' explain something doesn't mean it is the explanation... We don't know and every theory is viable at this point.
try this...
Anyone interested you can find it using stellarium and this information:
Right Ascension: 23m 34s
Declination: +33° 13’ 19”
Galactic Longitude: 66.06°
Galactic Latitude: 8.38°
Constellation: Lyra
GLIESE 758
HR 7368
Scientist should start looking along the ecliptic plane and watching disturbances amongst the stars aliening through the ecliptic plane
I like how they get rid of Pluto so they don’t have to call it Planet X
Pluto. Found it, thanks.
Why not use the JWST to find this planet now?
If there was another planet we would found it years ago
Or were still living in the middle ages
We found the newest 3 planets only recently like Uranus was only found in 1781 and Pluto only in 1930 around the time that certain German President was ruling
@@mr.burnsgaming8985 oh right the angry moustache maincrafft
Ya know, if Nibiru is really out there and it was found to be on its way, do you really think they would release that information?
No
They would not. Because that knowledge people would freak out. They would demand something be done to save them. People wouldn't work, pay taxes and chaos would ensue.
Why would it freak ppl out if we discovered a ninth planet?
@@TheNewAmericanDream because it is going to pass by VERY close.
We're talking about a potential real planet, not the mythical nibiru.
Planet 9 was called Pluto when I was a kid. Let's make it easy. Pluto
Excellent
lets just ignore the fact that's in fact next to the sun!
Fascinating.
I have a feeling this thing wont be colonizable.
Why cant we just ask the Aliens that are helping out underground in Area 51?
If we were on another planet in a different solar system, what planet in our solar system would be discovered first?
_"Insert Pluto comment here"_