Mapping the Multiverse
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 พ.ค. 2020
- PBS Member Stations rely on viewers like you. To support your local station, go to: to.pbs.org/DonateSPACE
↓ More info below ↓
Sign Up on Patreon to get access to the Space Time Discord!
/ pbsspacetime
Check out the Space Time Merch Store
pbsspacetime.com/
Sign up for the mailing list to get episode notifications and hear special announcements!
mailchi.mp/1a6eb8f2717d/space...
This is a map of the multiverse. Or in physics-ese, it’s the maximally extended Penrose diagram of a Kerr spacetime. And in english: when you solve Einstein’s equations of general relativity for a rotating black hole, the universe does not come to an abrupt halt at the bottom of the gravitational pit. Instead, a path can be traced out again but you do not end up in the universe that you started in. Like I said, it’s a map of the multiverse.
Hosted by Matt O'Dowd
Written by Matt O'Dowd
Graphics by Leonardo Scholzer, Yago Ballarini, & Pedro Osinski
Directed by: Andrew Kornhaber
Camera Operator: Bahaar Gholipour
Executive Producers: Eric Brown & Andrew Kornhaber
End Credits Music by J.R.S. Schattenberg: / @jrsschattenberg
#space #astrophysics #multiverse
Special Thanks to Our Patreon Supporters
Big Bang Supporters
Alexander Tamas
David Nicklas
Fabrice Eap
Juan Benet
Morgan Hough
Radu Negulescu
Quasar Supporters
Christina Oegren
Mark Heising
Vinnie Falco
Hypernova Supporters
william bryan
chuck zegar
Danton Spivey
Donal Botkin
Edmund Fokschaner
Hank S
John Hofmann
John Pollock
John R. Slavik
Jordan Young
Joseph Salomone
Julian Tyacke
Mathew
Matthew O'Connor
Syed Ansar
Timothy McCulloch
Gamma Ray Burst Supporters
A G
Adrian Hatch
AlecZero
Andreas Nautsch
Andrew Richmond
Bradley Jenkins
Brandon labonte
Brandon Lattin
Brian Blanchard
Cass Costello
Craig Stonaha
Dan Warren
Daniel Lyons
David Bethala
David Hughes
DFaulk
Eric Kiebler
Frederic Simon
Geoffrey Short
Graydon Goss
Greg Smith
Jennifer Crosley
John Funai
John Robinson
Josh Thomas
Justin Waters
Kevin Lee
Kevin Warne
Kyle Hofer
Malte Ubl
Mark Daniel Cohen
Michael Conroy
Mirik Gogri
Nick Virtue
Nick Wright
Nickolas Andrew Freeman
Oliver & Kiersten Thamm
Patrick Sutton
Paul Rose
Protius Protius
Robert Ilardi
Scott Gossett
Sean Warniaha
Shane Calimlim
Simon Oliphant
Steve Bradshaw
Tatiana Vorovchenko
Tim Stephani
Tonyface
Tybie Fitzhugh
Yannick Weyns
Yurii Konovaliuk
I'm disappointed that the ring singularity wasn't called a "ringularity"
That’s fairly common, he just didn’t use that in this video.
It would be a mistake, because it is NOT a ring either.
It is "another donut" (like the ergosphere), defined as ~whatever~ new strange physics that -DOES NOT COMPUTE- [different than what governs our universe].
From wikipedia: "A ring singularity or ringularity is the gravitational singularity of a rotating black hole, or a Kerr black hole, that is shaped like a ring."
@@spammerspammer90 This is like trying to argument that a black hole is a "hole" in the "fabric" of spacetime.
-> There is no discontinuity at all!
Spacetime does not "rip" or "break" or "shatter" [the Penrose Diagrams depend on the conceptual entelequia that (time+space)=energy=information].
@@spammerspammer90 How DARE you cite Wikipedia! Don't you know it can be edited by anyone? It can't possibly be as reliable as this awesome sketchy site from 1492.
I feel like every time we see a Penrose diagram in Spacetime, it is slightly larger than the previous one.
A few episodes doen the line and we will meet the boss of penrose diagrams, bigger, and more incomprehensible
Soon we'll be able to play Penrose chess. And then the universe shall have fulfilled its purpuse.
It is known that Penrose diagrams grow over time.
Jonathan Luoto
Not only that, but the rate of growth of Penrose diagrams is accelerating! Leading to physicists hypothesizing the existence of “Dark Cartography”
That's just a result of living in an expanding universe.
"Multiverse cartography..."
This is gonna be one of those hard mode episodes, isn't it?
@Kleos whaT
mHm , mHM its 11:08 PM and im brain is sleeping am a Rile. Differwnt. Subatomic brain is working, not the original. Oh I meant the subconcious is conciousing me instead of my regular concsious. it is asleep
*Before watching*
"Yeah, I think I'll understand a little of this..."
*After watching*
"I can feel the warp overtaking me... IT IS A GOOD PAIN!"
Heretic.
HERESY
6:51 "Our balls, and the geodesics they follow, rebound and travel back out." -Matt O'Dowd, 2020
ThisFlyingPotato So say we all.
Didn't he also say something about repulsiveness of naked rings and plunging into them?
SupraGuy2jzgte yoo new pick up line! For my nonexistent game.
@SupraGuy2jzgte To sum up the video, once you go black you never go back
I bet it took several takes before he got through that part without him or anyone else in the room laughing
"this may sound fun, but there's the inconvinient fact of your utter obliteration" got a real chuckle outta me
Because that's not an "inconvenient fact", it's a flesh wound
I wonder if we could control quantum entanglement with particles active to observers when sending them to the black hole; all of his manners would be replicated in their entangled par to be viewed live by humans.
"Our balls, and the geodesics they follow, rebound and travel back out." Haha, you tease!
This is an especially great video, even by PBS-ST standards.. I've been waiting for this one since pt 1, and it didn't disappoint. Love the stuff on the inner structure of the Kerr black hole especially, there's next to no information about this online that doesn't require a graduate-level (or higher) understanding of math/physics to even be able to read.
Right? I'm glad I understood most of it after watching it like 20 times and doing research, finally. I hope we can one day try to explore black holes more and more
Sayın enai hirt
Sizin anlattıklarıniz eski zaman masallarinin acı ortaylarini teğet gecen yamuk cozgilerdir.Yamuk çizgi günümüzde geçersizdir
Lütfen ayak degistirin
@Kleos um... what?
@@enaidealukal4105 I feel like many Atheists and Science-Fans dont realize how much
those 2 Overlap. And i even add a Third: Conspiracy-Debunk-Channel. Kent Hovind is a good Way to measure this constant Overlap in Content:
Hes covered by all 3 Kinds of Channels,
just like Flat-Earth and Evolution-Denial.
I think the Fans should be more aware that theres more Fun for them to have.
"Repulsive naked singularity"? Way to give the singularity body image issues, Matt.
Singularity shaming is a thing now??
I prefer the term 'time reversed' naked singularity, attractive in its own, beautiful, way
Does that depend on if we give them masculine or feminine pronouns?
No wonder it's always hiding behind that event horizon.
@@obsidianjane2267 Singularity is a female noun in French and Spanish
Can I get this Penrose diagram embossed on a towel? I'd like to pack as light as possible for the trip...
That is a great idea given that a towel it's the most important item for a galactic hitchhiker
@@luisaleman9512 yes thats the reference they were making
@@luisaleman9512 Haha, you were thinking along the same lines as me, see previous comment. 😄
I've been staying home, dealing with depression, everything is just kinda 'meh' in my life... And then this. No idea why, but I got so excited while watching this video! I muttered to myself multiple times in an effort to actually understand things, 'rewound' (is that word even used anymore?) probably a half-dozen times to make sure I really took in what was being said... This made me so happy. I'll never truly *understand* most of these videos, but it's so so fun to watch and think about anyways.
That's it, that's the exact same feeling I get. I watch them with an awe struck face trying to understand how there are some humans understanding things on a level I'll never be able to
But it's hypothetical unless we know for sure what singularity really is 😒
I had the same reaction. This is all theoretical but even the fact this is a possible is amazing. It really speaks to the fabric of space/time and how our universe functions. So much more research needs to be done but I doubt this gets the attention it deserves.
Break the cycle, raise above, focus on science, sis
"Be Kind, Rewind!" You're not alone, Margo. Stay safe, and stay sane, and don't feel like you can't reach out to someone, even if that one is a many and those many are internet strangers. Isn't this stuff just fascinating? :D
Am I the only one that laughed uncontrollably at "this may all sound fun but unfortunately theres the inconvenient affect of your utter obliteration" @11:10
Yes
It made me think of death. Maybe we have to die (go through the black hole and get obliterated) to get to our next life (another universe). I'm not religious or anything, just a thought.
Low key British wit gotta love it. I usually sort of do a half smile of amusement and slap around that lady from > Keeping Up Appearances
@@thepricillove5244 You slap Hyacinth Bucket on a regular basis?
@@pineapplepenumbra "it's pronounced Bouquet"
I just found out Matt O’Dowd is almost 50 years old.
Which of the time machine options have you used to look 20 forever?
Bro what?!
how is he so smart
I would've guessed late 30's
Seriously? That's insane.
Wow
T-shirt idea (from 8:05) - "Naked Singularities are Repulsive"
Steve WithAQ the t-shirt would thus also be cut open in the back
Oh
What, would you prefer one with hair? ;)
I would buy that
I'd buy that for a dollar :)
This is absolutely wildly interesting and elegant, I can conceptually comprehend maybe 19% of the whole concept at this time in this version of this existence in this universe.
localized entirely within your kitchen?!
Yep, localized entirely in my own kitchen, @Mandara8989
Well, this was an unexpected place to come across a Mage: The Ascension reference. Thanks, Matt!
We actually have a Kickstarter ending in about a week for a deluxe edition of our upcoming "Technocracy Reloaded," so please do check that out if it's the sort of thing that interests you.
I’m waiting for a ref to “Heirophant Apotheosis: The Raising”
You know you're in trouble when an astrophysicist calls you a nerd.
A compliment, to be sure.
...but he also knew the Order of Hermes from "Mage: The Ascension" so you can think of it as an inclusive greeting. Anyway, Homer Simpson quotes tend to get the last word, like in SG1 on the last fishing trip: "Close enough..."
wrg, not nerx no matter what, learning some science s k
Some Dude but a welcome one
@@DiracComb.7585 Of course.
When travelling the Multiverse, always remember : Don't panic and always carry a towel.
Spoony And don’t smash tiny rodents
Bring TP cause you never know if thats a thing in the new universe
@@JusNoBS420 Better panic buy now
Just make sure the towel has the maximally extended Kerr map of the Carter-Penrose diagram of space time printed on it.
Always a towel!
Question: So now that you've got this figured out for us, how about showing us what happens to matter and space time within these boundaries, but during a black-hole merger? Please and thank you :)
I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest that you probably don't want to be in there when that happens. Or would that be *where* that happens? We are flipping time/space coordinates after all...
@Kleos Huh? A "ruling bloodline" with the implication that he has some "insider" knowledge? Perhaps a fantasizing philosopher with a big ego.
The question "Are you really living on the planet you think you are?", while philosophical at heart, is more a question of semantics, because whether we live on a "planet" at all, and what particular planet it is called, is arbitrary semantics we've created to label something.
If the question revolves around whether
we've somehow been fooled or misunderstand our situation or are in the matrix, this is a very old conversation that goes back long before Rene DeCartes' famous line "I think, therefore I am". In other words: How do we really "know" anything at all aside from being a collection of thoughts? Fun topic, but nothing new or groundbreaking in philosophy.
@Kleos I will read further out of curiosity, but with all due respect, the Illuminati and anything related are more boogeymen than reality. To the rare "spiritually" enlightened person, and those who "like water" go with the natural flow and change of the world, any group/organization that might exist with such power will hold no sway over such a person.
To be fair, this is a rare minority, but any organization with power only achieves it in the minds of people. Without people thinking, believing, and following that which the Illuminati (or whoever) would want, they are powerless.
I would like to read this conversation you spoke of so I can get my thoughts on it.
Thank you to you and your team for producing these videos! They've long moved past my understanding, but I enjoy them all the same! If we had physical access to a black hole what are some experiments that could be done that could advance our understanding of space time?
*My Brain at the start of the video:*
“Multiverse _[Captivating Scientific Gibberish]_ . In English this is *[Captivating Scientific Gibberish with a hint of English]!* ”
@DejaVoodooDoll Or, just think anti-particles are regular particles going backwards in time, or regular particles just anti-particles going backwards in time. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
: Reads the headline: - yeah... I'll definitely understand this...
Its easy bro
@@E_PHI_r Don't get me wrong, I don't disagree, I think everything can be learned by the average human. I learned my profession by myself, with the internet...
and I understand this on a basic level, pretty well, but I don't understand how it should be understood, (on a mathematical level, with equations, etc...) it is not my profession.
I definitely don’t
Brilliant people. There's understanding then there's UNDERSTANDING. Its insane how deep the rabbit hole can go for what we believed to be simple.subjects from.a. vague point of view. Look at the proof for 1+1. Like wtf? You can proof what we thought we could take for granted.
Watches the video : yeah... I definitely understand it now...
“Let’s push a little harder and try to get through the ring”
Just remember not to pull out too early or it could get messy.
Black holes do have an irresistible attraction.
@@TheStarBlack Repulsive when naked
Matt: You're inside the inner erogsphere and could die.
Me: Haha spinny lightspeed ship go brrrrrrrr...
Matt: you can't really travel back in time!
Me: haha time go ɹɹɹɹɹɹɹɹɹq
Ride the ergosphere - good for a t-shirt!
Haven’t watched it yet but I don’t get it.
It's okay, you will understand even less after watching it.
@@LaminateMonkey remember, licking doorknobs is illegal on other planets
Watch the other videos of the channel and you will start to understand somethings
@@calculandopoop5825 bold of you to assume
@@sleazymeezy And just gross on this planet.
"nerdery".... as of today, definitely one of my favorite words! 🤓🔎
I love your visualizations and the sound design. Great work!
Wait, where is the bookshelf in this diagram?
I need to float to behind the bookshelf...
MURPH!
YES also how could anyone forget that LOVE is the ONLY THING that transcends time and space, we can do it guys. All we need is love
@@thatgirlinautumn5995 Yeah no 😂
Is this video saying that Cooper didn't come back to his own universe after that event in the black hole?
@@thatgirlinautumn5995 looks like aromantic people are gonna have to stay on earth
Good luck with that map, Google.
Meanwhile my GPS: "Recalculating..."
You cant go back to previous universes, but at least you can see entirety of them on google street view.
@@auregamer5 hey, they found the Millennium Falcon on maps, and that was from a long, long time ago in a galaxy far away
@@NaptownsClassic No, that would be in the past universe, you're now in a new universe...
there you are
Very interesting, informative and worthwhile video.
You’re the man I learn so much from watching your channel. I am going back to college for physics. Thanks for the inspiration!
Yes lads, good to see everyone checking in nice and early.
You know the world is global, right?
"Our balls, and the geodesics they follow." (6:51)
I chuckled.
_our balls_
Can you guys do a video on naked singularities, or the anti gravity universe you get into by traveling through the ring's wormhole?
Thanks Matt. I just watched a lecture by Sir Roger Penrose at Gresham College and had to watch your video again in an attempt to learn a bit more. Turns out quite a bit more. Thanks again for your time and work putting it all together.
I feel like many Atheists and Science-Fans dont realize how much
those 2 Overlap. And i even add a Third: Conspiracy-Debunk-Channel. Kent Hovind is a good Way to measure this constant Overlap in Content:
Hes covered by all 3 Kinds of Channels,
just like Flat-Earth and Evolution-Denial.
I think the Fans should be more aware that theres more Fun for them to have.
Don’t you mean “the multiverse of madness”?
Also, I’m guessing the hitchhiker’s guide to the galaxy isn’t gonna help me with these new universes?
No...this is pure physics
2 Sides 2 Every Truth yeah, this is mostly mathematical extrapolation involving manifolds and differential geometry. In a mathematical sense, it’s possible, and it certainly might exist, gut no experiment has yet proven that this is precisely how it works.
Think the new Doctor Strange is caught in a permanent limbo, or will we ever see it?
The Guide Mk.2 would have been able to help you, but it seems it was stolen by a disgruntled restaurant columnist.
I mean, this is a testable theory. We just need to get to our closest supermassive blackhole and take the plunge. And thanks to quantum immortality, you will survive the encounter.
9:55 The extra "l" stands for extra parallel.
it took me a few seconds to notice 😂
Episodes like these are what Space Time is all about (or what got me into watching SpaceTime).
6:16 No, this is not correct. It's easiest to see this in the Kruskal-Szekeres coordinate or the Penrose diagram. Also, space and time do not change directions, this is just an artefact of a strange coordinate system being used (namely, the one that results from first arranging the yet unknown metric into a diagonal form which is done merely to make solving the Einstein equation easier, or even possible, in a closed form). Such coordinate systems are singular at the horizons and due to a quirk of the mathematics involved, the letters labelling radial and time directions end up being reused at the resulting disconnected patches. But this is just a bit of notational laziness. Hawking and Ellis in their book try to counter this by switching the letters "r" and "t" for the interior portion of the Schwarzschild metric, for example. 7:33 It does not "become" repulsive. The ring singularity is gravitationally repulsive on both sides of the disc. The mass is not "negative", it's just that the radial coordinate labels become negative. Same thing about the "nakedness" of the singularity: it is so on _both_ sides (once inside the inner horizon), not just inside the "negative space". 14:15 This is very commonly asserted but it's just not true: Einstein was very likely not even aware of the Michelson-Morley experiment (USA was a scientific backwater then). His motivation was different: he was trying to resolve the infamous conundrum of Maxwell's equations not being true in a uniformly moving system. Since Newtonian mechanics obviously is not like that, and mechanics was supposed to be an effect of the microscopic electric and magnetic forces, this drove everyone crazy. His 1905 paper was in fact about justifying why the electromagnetic fields E and B were _physical_ after a Lorentz transformation (before him everyone assumed that those transformations were only mathematical curiosities). This was _the_ main conclusion of this paper in which he demonstrated how this reality of the transformed fields resolves the magnet-and-coil paradox he sets up in the introduction to the paper. But, as it very quickly turned out, probably within weeks of the publication, it was the first, kinematical (introductory) part of the 1905 paper that was the smoking gun (special relativity). So today hardly anybody even _reads_ the actual main (second, electrodynamical) part of the 1905 paper.
It just feels like you're explaining how the universe is gonna start and end over and over again.
Kinda looks like a torus in my mind. Where the extended penrose diagram could be seen as moving along the toroidal geometry. So it could just aswell be circular instead of infinite.
NoxA Eventide
Wouldn’t it being circular implicate that it is infinite?
Raezores Yeah, he can get a bit repetitive… =‑p
Even if you reverse time it woulden come out as the same entrophy wount be restored
th-cam.com/video/TWDMMaL2qc8/w-d-xo.html
It's really strange watching videos from a channel for years and barely understanding a thing. But I have to keep watching, it's so interesting!
Again I have the feeling that if I whatch it 100 times I will get it... So it is not possible a white hole existing or matter going trough it but is possible that the fabric of space itself can go through it? If that will be possible, it will make sense that the big bang could be a white hole that is accelerating the fabric of our universe by pouring "space" into our universe "from another universe" and we will never be able to see it because it is in our past? It's a total non sense I know just curious and ignorant.
Great episode.
~ A blackhole that has no spin or charge is basically neutral/static, it basically consists only of a mass constituent.
A neutral/static blackhole is essentially a wormhole without an E.M. energy jet stream.
~ A blackhole that has spin or charge has motion due to induced energy, so it is not a neutral blackhole but instead a dynamic/energetic blackhole.
It is essentially becoming a wormhole that has both motion & spin because of centripetal & centrifugal forces that are caused by induced energy, with more prominent Grav. blackhole & E.M. jet stream characteristics.
~ The more extreme the mass of the Grav. blackhole vs the more energetic the E.M. energy jet stream, the more prominent & extreme their mass/volume (density) characteristics become.
~ A neutral wormhole has a Grav. mass accretion disk & E.M. energy volume jet stream which are both in balanced density equilibrium.
The matter mass vs energy volume ratio is balanced/equilibrated.
A stable wormhole supports a peaceful existence for life.
Our solar system is close to being in this state, therefore it supports life as we know it.
~ Inertial Permittivity x Potential Permeability = Static/Dynamic Kinetics.
~ (Grav. Mass Accretion Disk Blackhole) / (E.M. Energy Volume Jet Stream) = Static/Dynamic Density Wormhole.
*Takes plunge into black hole*
God I wish that were me.
Is grad school taking your will to live, Andrew
when is physics memes coming back
@@schokoladenjunge1 any college does. Brainwashes you into a raging liberal if you're not careful......🤦♂️
Cannonball!
@@theg.c.142 That's the most unlikely place to find echo to anti-intellectual rants, I'm afraid. But do go on, tell us about how liberalism has ruined everything by giving you the right to freely rant against it... * yawns *
Last time I was this early, all fundamental forces were unified
Theo Dixon I sat here trying to think of something clever along these lines to no avail. Nailed it man!
They still are. Problem is, we evolved this corpus callosum...
David Lloyd-Jones so you’re asserting that in fact spontaneous symmetry breaking didn’t happen when the cosmos cooled shortly after the big bang but rather that it happened when human brains evolved a few millions of years ago? Is this more of a symbolic metaphorical statement? I love DMT as much as the next guy but I think filling in a few more blanks for us readers would help get the point across better.
@@samsungtelevision695 I think he is referencing to our time perception, but I don't know what it has to do anything with corpus callosum.
@@samsungtelevision695 you don't need to be on psychedelics to acknowledge the anthropological has as much significance as the cosmological. after all, we are the locus of understanding
What does it mean to "fall" and "inside" mean when one crosses a black hole event horizon where, what was a space dimension intersecting the singularity, is now a time dimension that I presume now intersects the singularity?
Ergosphere surface and event horizon diagrams are almost correct. The event horizon is the spinning sphere that we are contained in crumpled up inside. You learn how all of them are contained based on their spin and angels should line on at one point within our galaxy. Somehow I believe the forces line in some orientation towards or away from the great attractor. That is one of my crazy ideas.
Penrose has also recently extended the diagrams to the left and right, in the Conformal Cyclic Cosmology model. Are we going to have an episode on that?
It looks implied that the left and right side extend infinitely. Again, it’s a donut
What if the Penrose donut ring was the ring around a black hole like Matt explained in his video which is inside a black hole. That would be mind blown!
@@ATX_Engineer mmm donut. Which means that The Simpsons is really on that time travel business
yes let's do!
Z Hud it’s 10pm and now I want a donut
“When your balls rebound...let’s push a little harder” - not a TOS violation, I swear!
C O C K A N D B A L L T O R T U R E
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia at www.wikipedia.com/CBT
Deadpool: breathes a sigh of relief at his balls rebounding out of the Ring Singularity
In the best scenario, it goes in a loop, and it's still infinite, but it ends up back in our universe at some point. Also, the thing about space and time switching roles creeped me out. I had dreams about it. Thankfully, I'm glad the ergosphere gave me a boost out of there in those dreams.
When a topic on this show has a black hole and Matt talks about space and time switching. The end should be time-space instead of space-time
Ahhahahahahahhaha exactly
Nobody warned me that we need drugs to watch this episode.
John Grey this one is the drug lol
Anirban Chakrabarti bruh you’re making me jealous stoppp
@Anirban Chakrabarti I'm _also_ thoroughly jealous. You know the rules, you need to bring enough to _share with the entire class._
Dude. That’s every episode.
@@mrmccranky _Dude._ You have a great point. Duuuuuuuuuude.
...I'm intoxicated and making fun of the word rather than you, and I even like the word, just adding that disclaimer since I know many people are 🦆ing awful, especially on TH-cam comments. It's almost like they've never watched and accepted the words of our Lords and Saviours, the Wyld Stallyns. *Be excellent to each other!*
Well, had to watch that one twice. Wow. Fantastic explanation. Thank you.
I BLOODY LOVE SPACETIME!!! You guys are brill!
Just to clarify, this concept of “multiverse” has NOTHING to do with the multiverse predicted by quantum physics, right? If there are two universes, one with the alive, and the other with the dead cat, I cannot use a black hole to travel from one from the other, because that is an entirely different concept, only the naming is similar.
Yes. "Many worlds" is the rationalization to explain the paradox of a literalist Copenhagen interpretation of superposition. Where as the relativistic multiverse is.... bending math to prove that hypothetical "other universes" exist. Both are effectively just mental exercises that don't exist.
Goaltender Interference
I don’t know, ask Matthew McConaughey. He saved the whole world by doing that.
@Goaltender Interference awww why not ?
@Goaltender Interference i would
On the map, the multiverse you're referring to I suspect is represented by the "parallel universes", while the multiverse mathematically accessible is represented by "new universes".
"Now you're thinking with portals"
VERY eye opening video. Thanks 😊 I totally forgot about penrose diagrams...
Your explanation of complicated science would make a great setting for star trek episodes
i'm totally imagining a sci-fi civilisation that teleports "singularity-mills" directly past the inner horizon to extract energy from the inner rotation, which would somehow be entangled to some turbines outside the black hole to make energy
None of it really make sense but it sound too cool so I need to create some lore around that. The madness of physics is just so much of a infinite well of inspiration
Not exactly this idea, but Kurzgesagt has a video on how to extract energy from black holes
You hit the nail on the head. This is all science fiction. For people who believe only in the physical world, this takes a bit too much faith for me
We’re about 50 iterations off the Finite Central Curve.
Say what?
Oh right
PA broken universes
Huh
It's videos like these that make me love the Universe and it's rules because you can exploit them to do all kinds of weird things
Can we please get a shirt with the full Penrose diagram? Instant buy.
Question: As black holes are said to evaporate (something that I assume also applies to Kerr black holes), and space and time switch places beyond the event horizon, would the effect of passing through the event horizon effectively be the process of this evaporation? As you (a 3 dimensional object) pass through the Kerr black hole and are annihilated by these incredible forces, some of this energy and information is deposited in the form of energy during evaporation. So the white hole is actually a mathematical representation of this process of energy conversion.
In essence, the question I am asking is how much of this changes when not dealing with an eternal black hole? Is it simply interpretational or is it possibly completely different?
Interesting
I think it's probably completely different. All of these models are purely general relativity, you only get Hawking radiation when you start to mix in quantum mechanics. Adding in QM probably changes a lot of other things from these models but I bet we'd need a much better description of quantum gravity to know for sure.
No.
There's a reason they add eternal to the description for the equations, the equations don't solve a blackholes beginning, or its eventual end through Hawking radiation. For one, it came about before it could even solve for the second.
Sup dude, hawking radiation is the result of matter-antimatter particle pairs popping into existence right at the event horizon. Normally these pairs instantly annihalate eachother, but at the event horizon one particle is pulled in while the other particle is ejected. I forget how this ties into the black holes mass, but I know these pairs come from the mass of the black hole.
The Penrose diagram image at :40... I want that as a black light poster please.
I'll sell you one for 120
This is among the trippiest videos I've ever seen . . .
This is... absolutely crazy. Spacetime/timespace-based reality...
And thus, the opposite of gravity is intertia.
And velocity is the quintessential component of existence - as a passionate driver, I love that.
A note on the mass inflation instability:
Out of the two perpendicular inner horizons in the diagram, only one has the instability if the black hole is not eternal. I.e. in a realistic scenario of a black hole which appears due to gravitational collapse, you can (sometimes) cross one inner horizon and get to the singularity without worrying about mass inflation. Also, at the horizon with the instability, backreaction seems to result in what is called a "weak" null singularity, "weak" because there are no divergent tidal forces and the geometry is extendable beyond it, so again not too much of a problem.
I was about to ask, these diagrams are for eternal black holes. Spinny ones, yes, but still unrealistic. I suppose Penrose diagrams are hard to make for non-eternal black holes of any variety...
None of the real black holes are eternal. So how are the Penrose diagrams for real black holes
I understood none of this so I guess this may be a legitimate physics talk.
@@timh.6872 They are not hard at all. Just take the bottom half of a Minkowski (flat) diagram and connect it to the top half of the black hole diagram. The line which separates them would be the surface of the collapsing matter distribution. Make sure that surface starts from a past timelike infinity of both diagrams, since you usually want its trajectory to be timelike.
How much of the weirdness is actually weirdness, and how much is the math being broken? Because the whole "closed timelike curves" thing usually means math is broken.
IMO the “multiverse” part already means that math is broken. I mean, rotating black hole is something you can _make_. Assuming there are multiverses reachable from black hole, does it mean that you can actually make infinite multiverses by creating a black hole of arbitrarily small size? Sounds implausible.
@@eugenekozlov1504 implausible, but not contradictory. Closed tulimelike curves on the other hand are an open door to all sort of time travelling paradoxes.
It is only broken to the human mind , at some point our hardware cannot venture into.
@@eugenekozlov1504 I think it's more of a black hole connecting two universes together.
Drkwll but it is impossible. You cannot “open” black hole into existing universe. All universes you can possibly travel to contain exactly one eternal black+white hole. Therefore, these universes do not exist until this black hole forms.
Exactly: above the limited event horizon of physics is the spectacular ergosphere of Philosophy!
so..when does Hollywood make a movie inspired by this episode?...what a wild ride that would be!
>”or maybe hufflepuff”
If this guy isn’t ravenclaw, ravenclaws don’t exist.
I don't know, he does seem to be a great finder of spacetime content.
Wizard smarts seems different from Muggle smarts...consider what Hermione says..."Books, cleverness..." (Sic) She's in Gryffindor...Luna Lovegood is in Ravenclaw...🤔 Hermione is good at logical thinking and solving puzzles...that's muggle smart...Luna is Wizard smart...seems more a type of empathic intelligence...with an understanding of the weird rules of magic...anyway...anyone who watches this channel regularly is a nerd to begin with...🤔😁
Ravenclaw 110%
Well, um... Ravenclaws don't exist.
Sooooo technically i can with my trusty map get "back" to the origin universe by going forward until i find a replia of it due to being able to go forward to new universes for as long as i want ... Got it....
Thought experiments aside, how would all this look like if we hold to our "knowledge" of not being able to exceed the speed of light in the torus on the other side of the ring singuularity, does it only do away with the time travel or the entire white hole part?
@CRIMNALSNEAK I loved this answer. If it weren't for you I would just say that we would die (ripped atom by atom) basically instantly before getting anywhere close to the singularity, that famous name that makes me want to go to my nearest italian restaurant
If the human mind is unable to visualize multiple universes, can a computer visualize multiple universes? It is simply a simple trick.
One of the most interesting Concepts have had the pleasure to think on. Thank you..
Wow, super interesting! i've been thinking about this video for several days now
SPACETIME! Day saved!
Edit: This broke my brain. More than any other PBS Space Time episode. I will have to re-watch tomorrow.
These episodes tend to assume you have a baseline knowledge of know these things work
Its why most people leave these videos utterly confused
Don't feel bad for having to rewatch multiple times or refer back to older episodes. Its part of the learning process friend
Yeah, seriously. Outside of most of the equations I tend to understand more than I would expect to of a lot of what Matt says, but for some reason he lost me so many times in this one. Definitely gonna have to come back again tomorrow too.
@@dustinjames1268 I would like to think I have a decent understanding on the intuitive level and thought visualisations that you need, to be able to follow most other Space Time episodes. This one just took, basically, all those previous videos about Penrose diagrams and black-holes and all the other spacetime breaking stuff and quick-fired them in a constant stream, while intertwining it all with each other.
I don't have a formal education in astrophysics, so all PBS Space Time content only gives me that "visual imagination" and "intuitive feeling" about how the universe works. The method hasn't failed me before this video. And even though the equations do make good sense to me, if you would ask me to rewrite them and use them in practice, I would not be able to. .... Yet...
Regarding this video, it is just a question of taking the time to sit down and break the events down in segments, and understand them one by one, and then chain the whole chain of events together. Across the multiverse style. ;)
But thanks for the encouragement.
@@semaj_5022 Exactly. ^^
This video turned me into an unstable genius
Show me what you got.
Amith Ramsumair ...of the 10-26 dimensions thought to exist so far, depending which string theory you chose, one of them belongs to ideas and concepts. If ideas and concepts have their own dimension, then they could very well have their own form of “ecosystems”. That very well could be us. If we are the ecosystems for ideas and concepts, then we are simply reemergent algorithms and doppelgängers aren’t just physical...
Corporations call ideas and concepts “creatures”. We face one that religious scholars identify as “The Beast”. It’s a thought algorithm that, by its nature, seeks to end all life on earth. It’s supported by a movement known as “Zionism”.
What this all leads to is a challenge of creation. If there is no sentient life to gauge the existence of the universe, does the universe exist to begin with?
Unstable genius that...
🙃
Also, intelligence is relative as everyone is stupid in their own ways. I figured all this out by applying objective laws to political theory, and low beyond, the objective laws emulates physics..
Kudos to the guy that went out and mapped the multiverse for us to see.
No need to map it when you just emc2itup like a cool kid
Wow, this video is so well done !
This time I really do think you made everything up.
Those were the other times
When you think you understand, then you have to start watching all of the videos in the series again to figure out where you got lost.
Just got back from there. Nothing helped with "space and time switch". Was literally yelling wait! wait! at my phone while I was queuing the previous video. Lol
It's nice to have followed up all the videos leading to this one and joyfully understand 1% of this one.
This is funny because when I saw the Penrose Diagram the first time I thought "If time turns 90° doesn't it turn again coming out?" and wondered if that would be covered at some point. Here we are!
I've always been a time traveller. Going at a steady pace of one second per second.
You're in the wrong newsgroup. You want reasonable-and-intelligent. Two doors down on the left.
Y'know, relatively speaking given the close proximity to Earth.
That's a chimo joke you just made
happiest moment of my day: seeing a notification from this channel
If watching this in a ringularity you would be watching time space instead of space time
Great cartography skills. Recognized my home stright away just from the thumbnail!
P.
S.
I believe i was lost once outside that map.
... *outside the map?*
13:56 Almost forgot! Thanks for reminding.
Lets take a moment to appreciate everything Penrose has done for the advancement of our understanding of space-time, and the surprises that he might still have up his sleeve in his ever-ongoing research.
Nice tiles. But does that make up for his "consciousness" nonsense?
David Lloyd-Jones Is this nonsense only from when he’s at Rogans podcast or does he say this somewhere else?
@@Fleurlean4
I don't know anything about Rogan's podcast. I'm thinking of his claim about microtubules being the seat of consciousness for some sort of totally hocus-pocus reason, which I probably read about in some Scientific American, Martin Gardner, columns thirty years ago...
Purest lunacy.
David Lloyd-Jones Very strange.
Been waiting for this episode a long time; seems you guys have a lot of stuff on your mind!
Great video, by the way.
Also, can you please print this map on posters? I would totally buy it, and so would other spacetimers.
Edit: Also please print it on a towel as quite a few people want it.
_(Insert reference to A Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy here)_
You seem like a real hoopy frood.
You already bought it 42 times and you just don't know it yet.
Dave Cotterill
Thanks :)
mindbogglingly conceptual yet, startlingly intuitive
I figured something similar out more than a decade ago........that the negative spacetime region gives birth to infinite negative mass energy and the positive region gives birth to infinite positive mass energy. As negative mass pushes outwards the result is indeed a big bang/white hole. I'm glad i've found someone who has reached the same conclusion.
Sam: "DESTROY IT!"
Kerr: "No."
Criminally underrated.
@@onemadscientist7305 indeed
Destroyed god and kept going
GG
At every horizon is associated a Temperature, since Kerr (and Reissner-Nordström) Black Holes have two horizons an observer in the region between these two horizons does see both radiating?
I would think the inner horizon would only radiate inwards, since time-like paths can't travel out from it.
6:09.. THAT'S ENOUGH. GOOD WORK.. MADE ME WALK AROUND AND LOOK AT THE SKY.. THERE ARE PEOPLE NOW ON THE STREET.
I've been really looking forward to the penrose diagrams, to mapping beyond the event horizon-your episode 'how blackholes spin spacetime' was a favourite of mine. So lucky to have this exceptional quality science channel available for free-thanks to sponsors. This channel and fermilab are the only ones I watch, with the latter always beginning with mathematical equations on a chalkboard-with a university lecture feel to it. PBS spacetime deals with more higher concepts-taking physics equations to their absolute extremes, and seeing what happens, in a way that is both accessible yet not watered down like other channels do-you include the meaty details incl equations. You amazingly achieve presentations that undergraduate and graduate physics students enjoy, amateur physics lovers, the complete astrophysics novice with reasonable intellect level,and ive even seen professors of physics to enjoy them. unfortunately like with fermilab there are always the few idiots who will write to fermilab every week claiming they have found something that proves special relativity wrong e.c.t. yet lacking the rigorous scientific education or ability to apply rigorous scientific method to even be in the discussion. Such people should be humble and engage with these high concepts with a childlike awe and wonder, with a desire to learn, reading up on more basic scientific principles-for example i am eager to have an intuitive grasp of the mathematical equations that come up in these video presentations and in the science journal papers i read every week, the latest being arxiv.org/pdf/1312.2007.pdf, and arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/0105101.pdf, that latter one is my favourite current physicist Yakir Aharanov.
so i want to start calculus one, which physicist isaac newton is famed at having invented-allowing him to write his laws of motion, including his 'universal gravitation' and before that i am currently reading a comprehensive book on algebra, geometry and trigonometry-pre calculus to ground myself, as my maths level is embarrassingly low-maths is a use it or lose it skill, like foreign languages. an eight year would beat me at any maths in a test right now. My primary 'obsession' is with spacetime geometries, and the nature of time and time travel using quantum physic and SR plus GR.With the sudden surge in disinformation, a tactic for example disinformation is the primary technique deployed by the russian federation under president putin to toy with the west, with its russian state newspaper inventing a story about hitler's
'mein kampf' being more popular in latvia than harry potter. and this was payback for latvia being now a part of the west, a part of nato, which russia hates, and feels encroached by. And disinformation is rife from the American and British governments during this coronavirus pandemic. and from religious fundamentalists. That is why getting science from authoritative qualified sources is essential.
Arkadaş bu kadar uzun yazı yazilirmi...kısa kesin. lütfen..işimiz gucumuz var...
"Order of Hermes, or maybe Hufflepuff."
Man, if you thought the Mage RPG folks were coming for you before...
He’s a Void Engineer, if anything. :-)
That line cracked me up
True. He runs a Virtual Ecstactic show for... the Order of Hermes? What?!
Question: What would happen if an entangled particle fell into a singularity. Would we be able to receive measurements from it?
yes, but we could never confirm if we did or not, so no.
how about sending mire then?
@@nmarbletoe8210 Why are you such a nob ? The answer is No. Not some weird.....well, yes, but no, but yes, but maybe but ive no idea....The answer is a simple NO.
Pretty sure that you can't use measurement data from entangled paticles without measuring both by definition.
@@Mernom what do you mean by "use" measurement data?
"I've always thought of myself as more Order of Hermes"
17 min talking about black holes, relatively and the multiverse, not even a passing mention of sympathetic links, destiny or the spirit planes: You're not fooling anyone, Technocrat.
Keep up the good work, though, this was very enlightening!
Ring singularity leading to the Bizzaro-verse...
I freaking love this guy!! LOL
Does this mean that I can now get in my spaceship and start my promising career as a space cartographer?
You can but there's no room in the capsule for that big box of crayons.
@@TheDavidlloydjones oh man, I'll have to bring my small box instead. Do you think I'll be able to refill my crayolas in future universes?
the best part is you can keep selling your maps to people in the new universes and just hop into a black hole and go on to scam the people in the next universe with maps that they'll never be able to use
@@Ethan-gb3zh They could still use them to confirm models and ideas about how universes work in general, as you would see entire lifetimes of entire universes each time. But as a map, quite useless, unless they figure out a way to travel faster than light by using the ring singularity.
@@josephsalomone
According to the best information available on the subject, Crayolas are the dominant lif form on 0.00072917...% of ~iverses out there. In there. Wherever there. Also life forms. Too.