Two Scientists Are Building a Real Star Trek 'Impulse Engine'

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 พ.ค. 2024
  • Space may be the final frontier, but we can't go far on rocket fuel. Now, two scientists are working on a device that may one day make the "impulse engine" from Star Trek real.
    For more information about the MEGA Drive concept:
    www.researchgate.net/publicat...
    www.nasa.gov/sites/default/fi...
    #Moonshot #Science #BloombergQuicktake
    --------
    Like this video? Subscribe: th-cam.com/users/Bloomberg?sub_...
    Become a Quicktake Member for exclusive perks: th-cam.com/users/bloombergjoin
    Subscribe to Quicktake Explained: bit.ly/3iERrup
    QuickTake Originals is Bloomberg's official premium video channel. We bring you insights and analysis from business, science, and technology experts who are shaping our future. We’re home to Hello World, Giant Leap, Storylines, and the series powering CityLab, Bloomberg Businessweek, Bloomberg Green, and much more.
    Subscribe for business news, but not as you've known it: exclusive interviews, fascinating profiles, data-driven analysis, and the latest in tech innovation from around the world.
    Visit our partner channel QuickTake News for breaking global news and insight in an instant.

ความคิดเห็น • 4.8K

  • @yourdeadfeet
    @yourdeadfeet 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2407

    “A society grows great when old men plant trees in whose shade they shall never sit.”

    • @andrewmaperson
      @andrewmaperson 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      yes

    • @jaymac7203
      @jaymac7203 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Ricky Gervais to Karl Pilkington. Lool 😂

    • @eventfulnonsense
      @eventfulnonsense 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      A beautiful quote ♥️

    • @PaulTheSkeptic
      @PaulTheSkeptic 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      That's a beautiful quote but you never gave anyone credit for it. Is it anonymous? Is it you?

    • @tisrettamton153
      @tisrettamton153 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      @@PaulTheSkeptic Greek Proverb

  • @MrFlexNC
    @MrFlexNC 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2950

    I have a soft spot for old scientists devoting their lives to one particular question

    • @solver55
      @solver55 2 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      🤣rick

    • @Qwerty-qy9oj
      @Qwerty-qy9oj 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      Wabalabadubdub

    • @shaun906
      @shaun906 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      pickle Rick...🥒
      actually it reminds me of SABRE and skylon in the uk

    • @willymakeit5172
      @willymakeit5172 2 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      Don’t know about these other replies, but I’m in your corner.

    • @justkiddin1980
      @justkiddin1980 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      It also can be a problem if it turns out the science is bust...

  • @johnhiggs5932
    @johnhiggs5932 2 ปีที่แล้ว +608

    Real science happens at the edge and it requires a person bold enough to risk being wrong. No matter the outcome, I applaud these daring people!

    • @Piddlefoots
      @Piddlefoots 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      This will go no where. This is just a scam for funding. That could have been spent on better things.

    • @Pelletajuton1
      @Pelletajuton1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      @@Piddlefoots Could you explain? Frontier science is always difficult to justify before the effects of a possible discovery are understood.. If the theory would turn out true, it could probably be applied to a huge variety of other fields than space travel, even though efficient space travel itself could result in moving some of our destructive behaviors off the planet we're currently destroying.. i myself don't really believe that this kind of inertial drive would be made to work, but i've been wrong before, and would like nothing more than to be proven wrong about something like this. My belief that it wouldn't work is nothing more than a belief, neither is yours. Even if you tried this same thing and didn't get it to work, it only proves that YOU didn't get it to work, not that it's impossible.

    • @Piddlefoots
      @Piddlefoots 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Pelletajuton1 In short, it requires negative energy densities, which can't be strictly disproven but are probably unrealistic; the total amount of energy is likely to be equivalent to the mass-energy of an astrophysical body; like EARTH, the ENTIRE Earth, burnt as fuel, following, and the gravitational fields produced would likely rip any ship to shreds. Sean Carrol's estimate of the likelihood we will ever be able to build a "warp drive" is much less than 1%. And the chances it will happen in the next hundred years I would put at less than 0.01%.
      But they are very pretty pictures! Would look great in a movie.

    • @belken117
      @belken117 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Absolutely well said!

    • @Piddlefoots
      @Piddlefoots 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Pelletajuton1 Some of us in the real world have a scientific degree, and we know how hard real science can be, and the limits of the laws of physics are not something we can just break willy nilly with sci fi fantasy, like negative energy, in our world, we REQUIRE real testable evidence to confirm such facts......Less it not be a fact........Following ?

  • @clanpsi
    @clanpsi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +493

    Even if it turns out to not work, I'm still really proud that there people like these guys who are pushing the boundaries. True pioneers.

    • @dingdong2103
      @dingdong2103 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      What's interesting is that many times scientists draw inspiration from science fiction and actually manage to make it work. It's like fiction predicts the future. We should all start to write about amazing things in the hope of making them true one day :)

    • @michaelarnold1672
      @michaelarnold1672 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      The works of this man & men will live on for 1,000's of years as people cook off of Woodward's Recipe's ,

    • @kathleenmann7311
      @kathleenmann7311 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Imagination is just as important as knowledge.

    • @ianp3112
      @ianp3112 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@kathleenmann7311 only if you can differentiate between fact and fiction, fantasy vs reality!

    • @ianp3112
      @ianp3112 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      So in your view, scam artists are pioneers just because you wish it so!

  • @Ohmriginal722
    @Ohmriginal722 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2475

    I hope this 79 year old at least gets to see his idea tested in space. If it gets debunked like the EM drive, and I expect it will, so be it, but often science is all about finding 99 ideas that won't work before you find 1 idea that does, but those 99 ideas still taught you something, and I hope this teaches us something as well.

    • @gracialonignasiver6302
      @gracialonignasiver6302 2 ปีที่แล้ว +93

      I doubt it will work, but I really hope he gets to see his idea tested in space.

    • @cedriceric9730
      @cedriceric9730 2 ปีที่แล้ว +55

      @@gorgthesalty and engineers have found that it could even be used to create enough negative matter for a wormhole
      By disconnecting a body completely from inertia the body's electrons act as negative matter
      You don't even need that much mass to begin with due to some wierd quantum effect
      That mass can hold a wormhole throat open as long as you can maintain it!
      That's even better than a warp drive since Even at Mach 10 of light it still takes too much time on a cosmological scale to reach bodies of interest

    • @OktavianiFriska
      @OktavianiFriska 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      Agree, this is what we should learn on school. Even we learn about theory, they should push us to make another theory or technology

    • @chrisbraid2907
      @chrisbraid2907 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      If it does work I hope that they can scale it to useful size …. We really won’t know until we try …

    • @TheBreezus
      @TheBreezus 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@chrisbraid2907 I share the same sentiment. We should try. We won't know until we try.

  • @LukePuplett
    @LukePuplett 2 ปีที่แล้ว +538

    I need to pull that quote out by Mike McDonald, "Science isn't a tool that gets dirtied by use" because that's just as important in business as it is in theoretical physics.

    • @PHlophe
      @PHlophe 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      When i read that, i just went " Whew ! Chile, you took me out ".

    • @FBandSpin
      @FBandSpin 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      It’s a great, truthful liner! Applicable is so many fields. I loved everything he said.

    • @gregorygolando
      @gregorygolando 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      But scientists do.

    • @tonysamaniego7875
      @tonysamaniego7875 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Not sure about that...in business you have to be conscious of costs, so you can’t just experiment away with every idea. It might not get dirty but it sure gets expensive.

    • @dakinmaher4522
      @dakinmaher4522 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Agreed

  • @greggwilliamson
    @greggwilliamson ปีที่แล้ว +85

    I love the researcher's attitude!! That is exactly the way Real Science is done. I don't know who said it (sorry), but I've heard it quoted, "Great discoveries are not always the experiments intended outcome. It's when the Scientist looks at the results and thinks, *that's odd*"

    • @schubertuk
      @schubertuk 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I think that was the late, great Isaac Asimov: “The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not 'Eureka! ' but 'That's funny…'”
      The quote says "that's funny" rather than odd, but meant as 'peculiar' rather than funny-ha-ha

    • @alanmalcheski8882
      @alanmalcheski8882 หลายเดือนก่อน

      well that makes me... a really great discovery, then. The best kind.

  • @peppeddu
    @peppeddu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +109

    We built the International Space Station *specifically* to study these kind of things.
    Why not send a prototype over there and study it over a period of months and see if it actually works?
    I'm sure it's better than growing peppers, torturing insects or sending people to make movies.

    • @jamiemezs9891
      @jamiemezs9891 2 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      Because that would make sense and you know the politicians would never go for it.

    • @MrFujinko
      @MrFujinko 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Almost all of the science made in the ISS could have been done in specialized satellites for a fraction of the cost. The ISS existence is largely political. And it has been an absolute success in this regard.
      Regarding science, it effects are net negative. The biggest cost is to maintain humans alive in space. As many experiments do not need humans per se, they could have been realized in crafts not human rated.

    • @edwardj.coxjr.3031
      @edwardj.coxjr.3031 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      NRL and NASA get this going ASAP!

    • @jessepollard7132
      @jessepollard7132 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      but much less profitable than the movies.

    • @tapewerm6716
      @tapewerm6716 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MrFujinko How has it been an absolute success when the U.S. and NATO are engaged in a proxy war with Russia?

  • @Zorlof
    @Zorlof 2 ปีที่แล้ว +629

    Never mind the drive, this 79 year old man is the treasure.

    • @OktavianiFriska
      @OktavianiFriska 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Agree, what if his brain and Einstein brain is communicating on giant vial and talking about gravity and stuff, we already on the space like on jupiter or even several lightyears

    • @ForgeMasterXXL
      @ForgeMasterXXL 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Total agree and his dedication, even if it does not work is amazing.

    • @steady3459
      @steady3459 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      COMMON WE HAVE ZERO POINT ENERGY THE CABAL ARE HORDING !

    • @pjm760
      @pjm760 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      And his speech is made of gold

    • @igkslife
      @igkslife 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The drive is possible, and will work.

  • @CarlosMercadoINIGTDY
    @CarlosMercadoINIGTDY 2 ปีที่แล้ว +882

    These guys are real scientist. Sceptical to the core, as a scientist should always be.

    • @leaguemastergg3647
      @leaguemastergg3647 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      though I wonder if this will be another 3x+1 rabbit hole that isn't provable or disprovable

    • @dijasom
      @dijasom 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      He's looking for the resonant frequency of gravity, he just doesn't seem to understand that yet.
      When you use sound, to vibrate Crystal to shattering, that is a runaway resonant chain reaction.
      The same can be done with pretty much any material, just the effect is different.
      For instance, in a liquid, it would create a wave, that would then come back, and be propelled again away, etc, etc.
      Do this right, and you have propulsion.
      Gravity is everywhere, so it would be really, really hard to find it, as its hard to make something, prefer a direction, when all directions oppose the system.
      Think of gravity as water, though we have no idea, where the shore is for testing what its like without it.
      What he's doing, can't be disproven, as he is right...
      though, his instrument, isn't likely built correctly, and that particular instrument, could be disproven.
      It would go a much farther way, for him to prove, he could create a Water based "Thruster" with no "moving" parts, rather than gravity... as that is orders of magnitude harder, as its Far, less viscous.

    • @imengaginginclown-to-clown9363
      @imengaginginclown-to-clown9363 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@leaguemastergg3647 It is unknown if the Collatz conjecture is independent of ZFC.

    • @Antebios
      @Antebios 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@leaguemastergg3647 Ah, I see you're a Veritasium person as well.

    • @zyansheep
      @zyansheep 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@leaguemastergg3647 It's a different kind of provable / disprovable. With math, we invent the framework, the rules for how it works. With physics we are testing things out to see if our models are accurate or not.

  • @MichaelGalt
    @MichaelGalt 2 ปีที่แล้ว +106

    I love seeing old scientists like that still working and trying to and making significant contributions. It's too bad he probably won't see it make it to the real-world application phase... but hopefully he has children/grandchildren who will.

    • @warrencurtis7442
      @warrencurtis7442 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Hopefully he'll get some credit.

    • @baogiangtran1647
      @baogiangtran1647 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I felt the same

    • @alanmalcheski8882
      @alanmalcheski8882 หลายเดือนก่อน

      you must be saying that because you're not clear on what they're saying or how it works. I believe that if you were, you'd know that it's entirely possible and there's no reason that it shouldn't have been done already, and probably was. Piezo is a technology that was used in "fake" spaceships 80 years ago. Sure it had bigger crystals but it's piezo. You wanna know how a substance can change mass? the Higgs field, it exists. Not a secret if you study, just one of those things nobody will admit publicly.

    • @alanmalcheski8882
      @alanmalcheski8882 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ... and I said Field, not particle. Big difference. If you won't take the time to look into quantum physics, the power of the universe will never be revealed to you. money.

  • @timmo971
    @timmo971 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    I found it interesting that whoever built the graphic of the boat rowing @3:55 doesn’t even know which direction a rowing boat goes.

    • @2019inuyasha
      @2019inuyasha 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      normally the person rowing moves backwards. there is a system that can installed that changes the normal paddling direction to move you forwards however.

  • @taithai8726
    @taithai8726 2 ปีที่แล้ว +681

    This level of devotion is just insane. Much respect!!

    • @thewealthand_health
      @thewealthand_health 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      You have to be insane to comprehend the science 🧪 🔬⚙️

    • @OktavianiFriska
      @OktavianiFriska 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@thewealthand_health LeL, like what Einstein say

    • @chrishayes5755
      @chrishayes5755 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      can tell all that studying and working the the laboratory took a hard toll on his health and body. guy deserves a lot of respect for his sacrifices, even if his devices never ends up working to the extent he wanted.

    • @Ottee2
      @Ottee2 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@chrishayes5755 , I hope he lives to see his theory vindicated by proof.

    • @ClaytonBigsby01
      @ClaytonBigsby01 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@chrishayes5755 working on a passion project fully funded at a university took a toll on his health and body 😅 lol don't make me laugh kid

  • @business
    @business  2 ปีที่แล้ว +486

    "I'm 79-years-old. I don't know how long I'm going to live. Maybe I'll see something in space, maybe I won't. If I live longer than that, I'm pretty sure I will see something in space. Science fiction will be vindicated as transformed into science fact in that regard." - Professor Jim Woodward
    To learn more about the MEGA Drive concept, read the white paper here:
    www.researchgate.net/publication/269207998_Theory_of_a_Mach_Effect_Thruster_I

    • @polychoron
      @polychoron 2 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      Best of luck, Jim. Live long & prosper.

    • @pedoboybear3792
      @pedoboybear3792 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Do everything to bring your body outside of the planet earth to see the reality beyond your body vs the Spirit/Consciousness if they separated by Death and no hades can restrained on you after you escaped on to god's curse within this planet I try hard to Discover the God's truth but ended up in the Devils traps same like Judas failed on its own and don't succeeded until the right time.

    • @nixl3518
      @nixl3518 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Fun With Minerals what does "cor" mean?

    • @nixl3518
      @nixl3518 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Fun With Minerals he obviously has some health issues.

    • @nixl3518
      @nixl3518 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      ​@Fun With Minerals I don't really understand your comment. Nobody here is discussing the aging process or what happens when you're over 30. This man does not look like a man of 79 but a man with severe health issues that make him appear to be over 100 years old! You obviously have no experience with older people to make a comment of this kind.

  • @goldiz1978
    @goldiz1978 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    It would be interesting to see something like this tested in zero gravity.

  • @oeliamoya9796
    @oeliamoya9796 9 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    When I see these old scientists dedicating their entire life to one topic of research, I wish these great men had longer lifespans to keep pushing the limits of our knowledge

  • @Ash-yh5yn
    @Ash-yh5yn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +529

    "Gee guys, I'm really sorry. You know, it wasn't real after all." The fact that he's willing to own up to being wrong if he's proven wrong makes me adore this guy. I hope this works out for him :)

    • @rogerjamespaul5528
      @rogerjamespaul5528 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Obviously not a Trumpian.

    • @harrier331
      @harrier331 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @MichaelKingsfordGray And neither is yours... how does that make him a hypocrite...

    • @bongo3997
      @bongo3997 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@rogerjamespaul5528 whats a Trumpian?

    • @Ash-yh5yn
      @Ash-yh5yn 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@harrier331 You know, my initials are actually A.S.H.

    • @mr.zafner8295
      @mr.zafner8295 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      You hope it works out for him? I hope it works out for all mankind

  • @fancyIOP
    @fancyIOP 2 ปีที่แล้ว +520

    Jim should be relaxing at home at his age but he doesn’t wanna let his knowledge relax and die out. Big ups to the old people who are still active to make a change.🙌🏿👊🏿

    • @esecallum
      @esecallum 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      MOST PEOPLE OVER THE AGE OF 25 ARE DISMISSED AS TOO OLD.

    • @fancyIOP
      @fancyIOP 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@esecallum haha I hear you but you can see that Jim still has a mind of a 20yr old… he doesn’t wanna give up, he loves what he’s doing. So I guess it’s the drive within that keeps us going and he has a lot of it.

    • @esecallum
      @esecallum 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @Peter Evans with people like YOU we would still be in the caves.

    • @phildavenport4150
      @phildavenport4150 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@esecallum And this is relevant to the topic - how?

    • @fancyIOP
      @fancyIOP 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @Peter Evans indeed buddy, indeed.

  • @nemy_z1989
    @nemy_z1989 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    It's so amaze me that the old scientist are able to study and devoting this engine better than young gen today.

    • @RyanFranny-xb4uq
      @RyanFranny-xb4uq หลายเดือนก่อน

      Young gen is worried about gender studies and inclusion

  • @arinallen
    @arinallen ปีที่แล้ว +11

    It's a great idea, how in general, an impulse drive might work. It does make sense. It is interesting that inertia is the force in focus here. If those crystals can deliver this I would certainly like to know how they increase and decrease mass in that manner.
    Thank you for your inspiring work!

  • @thastayapongsak4422
    @thastayapongsak4422 2 ปีที่แล้ว +557

    Well you're a scientist. You're supposed to explore hypothesis, not turn down things just because the consensus is "this can't work".

    • @nolimit3281
      @nolimit3281 2 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      You've got to understand that they cant possibly test all the wonky ideas people come up with, some may be so laughable they are akin to wasting time because none of the concepts of the device make any sense and the creator doesn't seem to understand the physics behind the device either

    • @paulus121212
      @paulus121212 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      he is young all scientific breakthroughs have allways been done by older ppl
      as they think outside the box the young like to stick by the book

    • @krashdown5814
      @krashdown5814 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@paulus121212 Tesla wasn't old, such a shame his research is held by the USA.

    • @cedriceric9730
      @cedriceric9730 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@nolimit3281 testing this is extremely low cost! They can do this test with 1% the cost of buying coffee for the baboons at ITER
      What the heck could you be complaning about

    • @meleardil
      @meleardil 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      There are MANY things which work fine on paper, but in reality they dont. Not because of the "idea" behind it is wrong, but because the complexity of reality thwarts it, or the actual result is so minuscule that no practical use is possible.
      This seems to be the same to me. The key is the "change in mass" principle. How big is that? Also, is there ANY other effect countering it? It must be proved that there is NO possible "external" source of inertia. So, the "engine" can REALLY move on its own.
      The experiment is not built to prove that, which I see as a problem.
      The PRINCIPLE must be proven first, and THAN you can work on the most practical use of it.

  • @JP13795
    @JP13795 2 ปีที่แล้ว +635

    The theoretical physics side of these ideas aren't always wrong, its the ability to engineer the equipment that can actually do it.

    • @michac3796
      @michac3796 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      New times, new materials, new possibilities, new Ideas, new possibilities, new materials, new times.

    • @BerryTheBnnuy
      @BerryTheBnnuy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Dude, this isn't a theory, it's not a part of theoretical physics. 5:24 How do piezoelectric crystals change their mass? This is literally not an observed behavior piezoelectric crystals have. The only sense in which "the ability to engineer equipment that can actually do it" is even remotely correct is in that if something is impossible, it is necessary that no one has the ability to engineer equipment that can actually do it.

    • @VSci_
      @VSci_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      @@BerryTheBnnuy The total mass of objects do change due to their motion. He is saying the relativistic mass of the crystals increases then they turn it off and keep the forward momentum. Im not sure about this idea I have to think about it more

    • @_____J______
      @_____J______ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      yeah yeah yeah, but you got to push theory further, if you will stomp the ground in one place -- you wont progress

    • @eventhisidistaken
      @eventhisidistaken 2 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      @@BerryTheBnnuy They do change mass - they gain relativistic mass during acceleration. Relativistic mass is established and uncontroversial science. Conceptually, this is easy to understand. You use a current to cause momentary acceleration of the crystal, and during that time, the total mass increases due to the relativistic aspect. You push that system while it momentarily weighs slightly more, and then the acceleration/deceleration stops, and you pull the system, which now weighs slightly less. The net effect is the acceleration of the the thing doing the pushing and pulling - the spacecraft.

  • @mrvolcada5355
    @mrvolcada5355 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I was always taught that there is no such thing as a bad idea. The bad thing about ideas is a lack of them. Even if you think an idea is bad it may stimulate thought or provide a nugget for a newer and better idea.

  • @ravd8082
    @ravd8082 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    great to see these scientist still have the motivation to create this concept

  • @quigonbond
    @quigonbond 2 ปีที่แล้ว +554

    I wish Professor Woodward a long life so that he may see fruition of his theory into applied science.

    • @Gabriel-um9hm
      @Gabriel-um9hm 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      it's fake

    • @earlmarshall6543
      @earlmarshall6543 2 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      @@Gabriel-um9hm how do you know? back in the 60's and 70's Cell Phone theory and technology was considered fake and the product of an over-exaggerated mind. Now today most everyone has one.

    • @poodtang2104
      @poodtang2104 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Agreed.

    • @bigd5899
      @bigd5899 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@Gabriel-um9hm i dont think nasa supports fake physicists

    • @arkvoodleofthesacredcrotch6060
      @arkvoodleofthesacredcrotch6060 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      I get what you meant but I don't think this dude needs any wishes for a long life, he already has that. Now he needs wishes for a sudden breakthrough/development in his work

  • @arfyness
    @arfyness 2 ปีที่แล้ว +86

    "science isn't a tool that gets dirty by use"
    i love that

    • @coreyc47
      @coreyc47 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      No but sometimes it's just dirty from the beginning! Not in this case though!

    • @ShifuCareaga
      @ShifuCareaga 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It gets dirty from corruption and abuse

    • @gmork1090
      @gmork1090 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The scientific method. Not necessarily science itself as that can get sullied and perverted. The scientific method, however, can be utilized in all branches of knowledge.

    • @DrRusty5
      @DrRusty5 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The history is littered with occasions where an incorrect understanding was accepted to the effect that to say otherwise was hearsay - for example Phlogiston Theory. Eventually scientists realised that the answer was oxidation but having held onto the existence of Phlogiston for so long it had the effect of actually holding back science.
      Scientists through history who have challenged the convention are inevitably dismissed and ignored - only for some to be proven they were on the right track years later (often after their death).
      The pursuit of scientific discoveries should not be inhibited by the bias of think we know how everything works.

  • @N1originalgazza
    @N1originalgazza 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    It's amazing to see a man of that age still devote his life to solving an, almost, impossible equation!! 👏👏👏👏👏👏

    • @nathanmoses1953
      @nathanmoses1953 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Which equation?

    • @N1originalgazza
      @N1originalgazza 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nathanmoses1953 The "equation" to tap in the the gravitational potential of the universe, the MEGA drive.

  • @brookestephen
    @brookestephen 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Speed is NOT the problem... avoiding collisions IS the problem. Even a speck of dust can go right through you and your ship, while a planet, star, comet or asteroid could be too big to avoid... cutting you and your ship into tiny pieces and a mushroom cloud. Forget speed - work on anti-collision and protection from energetic radiation.

  • @DanyCesc83
    @DanyCesc83 2 ปีที่แล้ว +130

    Mad respect to these scientist who’s worked on this his entire life, investing his own money! If they can make this work, the applications for use here on earth will be invaluable and then move to space use.

    • @DhrubajyotiRaja01
      @DhrubajyotiRaja01 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Should Give Priority to an American Company for Industrial Use if It's made Practically Usable .....

    • @KWifler
      @KWifler 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I can't help but draw a similarity between my quest to get a girlfriend and this old guy's quest....
      Someday that old guy will be me, still trying to get a girlfriend...

    • @Ryan-eu3kp
      @Ryan-eu3kp 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@KWifler Don't dwell on it mate, it will happen. But if your not doing anything to make it happen then nothing will change

    • @RickMyBalls
      @RickMyBalls 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That research really took its toll - he's only 30!

  • @joshuadaly1295
    @joshuadaly1295 2 ปีที่แล้ว +409

    I like that this piece encouraged skepticism while also given the proponents of the mega drive a chance to make their case. I sincerely hope something amazing comes from this, but I appreciate that the scientists and engineers involved are willing to be proven wrong.

    • @brianwright9514
      @brianwright9514 2 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      Science can never be fully realized if the people researching are so married to their ideas that they'll ignore contradictory results.

    • @coralreef909
      @coralreef909 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Meanwhile there are extraterrestrial craft zipping along through our skies. What do they know that we have the inability to see. Our brain power has hit a roadblock.

    • @TheJimtanker
      @TheJimtanker 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@coralreef909 I must have missed that on the news. Where have you seen that there are extraterrestrial craft zipping through our skies?

    • @thewizzard3150
      @thewizzard3150 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      but are their detractors and competitors willing to have them proved right. I don't think so!

    • @WCM1945
      @WCM1945 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      They still have a lot of explaining to do...

  • @blueplanetoff
    @blueplanetoff ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Amazing work, you all who are working on this project, have my respect. I take my hat off to you.
    I can't wait to the results of the Cubesat test, cuz if it will be working, we are on our way to stars.

  • @Wise4HarvestTime
    @Wise4HarvestTime หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The satellite failed before the march principal could be tested. It was a real long shot, so how long might it be before anyone tries again. Maybe they could rebuild it and hitchhike on a starlink launch

  • @worldcomicsreview354
    @worldcomicsreview354 2 ปีที่แล้ว +347

    "Captain's log: All the engines are down, but luckily we all got home by brushing our teeth"

    • @Djake3tooth
      @Djake3tooth 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      This comment is underrated

    • @gmork1090
      @gmork1090 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@Djake3tooth Nah, I rate this comment extremely top shelf.

    • @harrypothead4575
      @harrypothead4575 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Elaborate please?

    • @HoHhoch
      @HoHhoch 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@harrypothead4575 The crystals they're using are the same ones you can find in an electrical toothbrush.

    • @MIHMediaInc
      @MIHMediaInc 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Albeit: impulse 😅

  • @ManicPandaz
    @ManicPandaz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +320

    The hard question of science isn’t “what can I prove true?” real question is “what question am I going to devote my life to try and answer?”

    • @timokreuzer1820
      @timokreuzer1820 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Sadly these days science is most often not about answering a question, but to get a publication claiming to answer one.

    • @disgruntledwookie369
      @disgruntledwookie369 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      No, it's "how can I disprove this theory". Your comment is so typical of pseudo-science videos like this one. No surprise that the commenters don't understand the scientific method.

    • @TheRootedWord
      @TheRootedWord 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      No. The hard question is that question you are most afraid to ask. Second hardest is that question you would immediately dismiss as silly.

    • @ManicPandaz
      @ManicPandaz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@disgruntledwookie369 Dude, what’s your problem? Try reading the comment again... Spending your life tying to answer “is this wrong?” is also asking a question. I specially juxtaposed”answer a question” with “prove. After all “proof” is only useful in math, baking and alcohol.

    • @ManicPandaz
      @ManicPandaz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@TheRootedWord I hear what you’re saying and I understand how hard those are but I tend to disagree. Mostly because I see spending 30 years of your life trying to answer a single question as harder than simply asking any question. What you spend 1/3 of your life doing is a hard question for everyone, science entirely aside.

  • @mohit_hada
    @mohit_hada ปีที่แล้ว +2

    These guys are pushing boundries of engineering!! Salute !

  • @dantreadwell7421
    @dantreadwell7421 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    So the main issue that I have with the naming and how the video is put together is that Star Trek impulse engines are explicitly reaction drives. Specifically, they are torch drives, powered by fusion reactors.

  • @owenlaprath4135
    @owenlaprath4135 2 ปีที่แล้ว +174

    This needs to be tested in a vacuum, because there are acoustic and aerodynamic effects with what they are doing, that have to be excluded first!

    • @kenrolt8072
      @kenrolt8072 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      Agreed. The device uses piezoelectric transducers of the same type used in sonar. Testing in a vacuum would then avoid acoustic radiation pressure (a nonlinear effect) from the aluminum vibrating head.

    • @leoleony1
      @leoleony1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      I believe I saw some vacuum chambers in their lab and office. I didn't read the study, but I believe they've set up in one of those chambers.

    • @Gabriel-um9hm
      @Gabriel-um9hm 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      It's fake... It amazes me how they managed to con people into giving them money.

    • @regmigrant
      @regmigrant 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      @@Gabriel-um9hm you seem very sure, where is your data coming from?

    • @ramirowendler
      @ramirowendler 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Em drive flashbacks

  • @whiterottenrabbit
    @whiterottenrabbit 2 ปีที่แล้ว +96

    1:25:
    Narrator: "Nasa is taking the idea seriously"
    Video: shows Comic Sans
    Me: **facepalm**

    • @mms09
      @mms09 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It wasn’t just me 😅😬🤦‍♀️

    • @imstupid880
      @imstupid880 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Beat me to it

    • @al424242
      @al424242 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I went to a lecture by a visiting Nobel prize winner and they used comic sans, must be some sort of joke.

    • @bluelpgamers8509
      @bluelpgamers8509 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@al424242 I use comic sans out of spite

    • @o15523
      @o15523 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's how you know it's the *real NASA*

  • @Ashallmusica
    @Ashallmusica ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm picturing this story as a movie in my head - a great scientist put his whole life to came with a logical idea for building a next generation vehicle for the coming future generation to leave earth as it won't last long for survival. I really admire such elder scientists 💙

  • @NicholasNerios
    @NicholasNerios 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Imagine the possibilities of tapping gravitational waves. Wow.
    Hopefully a prototype could be tested either on the iss or the up coming moon base.
    I'd like to see some low gravity, and zero atmosphere experiments...

  • @passerby4507
    @passerby4507 2 ปีที่แล้ว +167

    "Are we collectively smoking something?" -- Professor Jim Woodward 2021

    • @inlustrismedia
      @inlustrismedia 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      I'll have what he's having.

    • @krashdown5814
      @krashdown5814 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Tesla was smokin in his Tesla cage.

    • @dmacpher
      @dmacpher 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Canada checking in - yes

    • @arson8582
      @arson8582 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Why yes. Yes we are.

    • @rogerjamespaul5528
      @rogerjamespaul5528 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Elon is one of those collective smokers who discovered a way to think outside the box, by learning to control what he smoked instead of being controlled by what he smoked. I assume.

  • @phxzedior6823
    @phxzedior6823 2 ปีที่แล้ว +128

    i like to imagine that in a parrarel universe, Jim is actually the father of the golden era of mankind, where he already invented this many years ago, leading to the expansion of the human race onto the cosmos.

    • @BerryTheBnnuy
      @BerryTheBnnuy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I like to imagine that in a parallel universe, I don't have to deal with a constant deluge of pseudoscience from deranged, hyperenthusiastic neophiles.

    • @fatalsyn
      @fatalsyn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@BerryTheBnnuy Is that... someone who's sexually attracted to the matrix series?

    • @kidyomu89
      @kidyomu89 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      in this universe, we'll have to wait and see

  • @Dragelf540
    @Dragelf540 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    They should test this in a zero-gravity environment. One factor that may be affecting the results of the experiment would be that they are being done in an environment with a great amount of gravity. What they are trying to do is affect space-time with gravity to generate potential energy to create a large amount of inertia that will be used to push the spaceship forward at high speed to reduce the time needed to reach other planets. What I don't get is if the device uses gravity, would testing the device in an area with a large amount of gravity cause the experiments to show negative results.

  • @keagaming9837
    @keagaming9837 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wish these people success in the making and testing of this drive.

  • @axem.8338
    @axem.8338 2 ปีที่แล้ว +137

    9 days before Wright brothers flew their aircraft, there was an article in newspapers saying human flight is impossible.

    • @JackTheMurderer
      @JackTheMurderer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      I still don't believe that humans will ever be able to fly.

    • @EleanorPeterson
      @EleanorPeterson 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Newspapers? Journalists? Bah! It's always conveniently overlooked, but Sir George Cayley achieved man-carrying human flight in 1853, exactly fifty years before the Wright peeps got airborne under power (they credited Cayley for his aeronautical research data and original development work).
      Cayley's flight was in an unpowered aircraft because there were no suitable engines available at the time, but whoever was writing for that newspaper should definitely have Googled 'human flight's already been done' before going to print. 😁

    • @graham1034
      @graham1034 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@JackTheMurderer On Earth anyway. But in the clouds of Jupiter in a specially designed suit? Maybe one day.

    • @agentredbone1667
      @agentredbone1667 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Just like "getting the jab saves lives"
      One week later "you can still get covid and die and also die from the jab "...."oh and mask up, do as we say, and rights? What's that?"

    • @carlrodalegrado4104
      @carlrodalegrado4104 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      People even said no aircraft could fly over the Atlantic ocean

  • @garrithsmith799
    @garrithsmith799 2 ปีที่แล้ว +78

    All that dedication wont go unnoticed. One day this research could be a catalyst for the next step into space travel. Very impressive!

    • @JosephDavies
      @JosephDavies 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It may also prove to be a dead-end, but the information gained is still valuable.

  • @roarkm.o.banjonjeffries3713
    @roarkm.o.banjonjeffries3713 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I took a while guess before you showed the device corkscrewing through space-time. My guess was tight waves projected in front surfing those waves or pulling them through the machine and flattening out the back. Flattening the curve.

  • @craigg4246
    @craigg4246 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Before you can ever go to the stars in a human lifetime, you will also need to develop star trek type navigational shields. You just cant go running in to interstellar dust at relativistic speeds

  • @pauljmeyer1
    @pauljmeyer1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +50

    No matter what the result, the endeavour is marvellous.

    • @alext5497
      @alext5497 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      So long as you aren't the one funding it

  • @jaredwsavage
    @jaredwsavage 2 ปีที่แล้ว +303

    "Guys, we were wrong. We made a bad assumption based on sketchy data and wasted a lot of your money. We're sorry. "
    - No politician in human history

    • @Durzo1259
      @Durzo1259 2 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      Kinda like the over $2 trillion and thousands of lives America spent on Afghanistan, now right back where it started.

    • @seamon9732
      @seamon9732 2 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      @@Durzo1259 Partially true, it was a BIG SUCCESS for the military industrial complex's corporate welfare scam.

    • @giin97
      @giin97 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@seamon9732 hey, at least they employed a lot of people in the meantime
      ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    • @user-tp5yb4hr4w
      @user-tp5yb4hr4w 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Yeah most politicians would rather use the excuse of.
      I have investigated myself and found no wrongdoing.

    • @jaredwsavage
      @jaredwsavage 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@user-tp5yb4hr4w That is genuinely the case here in Ireland!

  • @odbo_One
    @odbo_One 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I wish I'm smart as these scientists, I would love to continue their research with them. Time is of the essence here.

  • @SteveWindsurf
    @SteveWindsurf 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

    1) If E = m C^2, then an objects mass can be altered by it's equivalent energy, although the density (form) of mass/energy conversion is important to magnitude.
    2) If that energy can be displaced (within a close system, so, without using particles), then mass will have apparently moved achieving momentum without inertia (breaking Issacs first law).
    3) Suppose then, the objects are physically swapped (via particles), yielding a force, inertia could made to apply in one direction only.
    The effect is like cycling a space ships center of mass, front to back, using very different physics, such that it yields a net force in one direction.
    The big question is how is energy (preferably photons) converted to mass - How does energy concentrate to become subatomic particles?
    Perhaps I don't understand but then, breaking Newtons laws has me so easily confused.
    Nice to engage!

  • @dsdy1205
    @dsdy1205 2 ปีที่แล้ว +162

    Wow, didn't know Woodward was still working actively on this, mad respect honestly.

    • @Piddlefoots
      @Piddlefoots 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      ZERO Respect is what he deserves, he is in it for grant money, not to actually build a warp drive, learn the factual science, this is nothing more than a fantasy.......

    • @twixxtro
      @twixxtro ปีที่แล้ว

      Hope he still is hope hes sucessful🙏

    • @dlperk5035
      @dlperk5035 ปีที่แล้ว

      What do you mean by "mad respect"? Do you even know what it means...

    • @dsdy1205
      @dsdy1205 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@dlperk5035 It means I greatly respect him. That's it.

    • @god4943
      @god4943 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dlperk5035 lol what?

  • @marcobertoglio7729
    @marcobertoglio7729 2 ปีที่แล้ว +109

    Beyond the fragility of old age, keeping the dream and not giving up... That is Star trek.

  • @TheNewPhysics
    @TheNewPhysics 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    People don't discuss Mach's Principle because observations have proved it wrong. LIGO observations showed that gravity and light travel at the same speed. Hence, there is no non-local interaction (a body with the whole universe instantaneously).

  • @ComeonmenID10T
    @ComeonmenID10T 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    When Einstein came up with theory of Relativity, most all called him Nuts too, yet it turns out he was absolutely right

    • @YouTubeH8sMe
      @YouTubeH8sMe 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Actually, hes not right, but he advanced our understanding and our desire to understand better and more.

    • @Piddlefoots
      @Piddlefoots 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Except his theories could be proven. This one they propose, never will. We need a sun, 10 times bigger than ours in a very small bottle to even come close to the energy levels needed to curve space-time fabric, THIS is what these dreamers ignore and fail to mention....... E=Mc² tells us there is absolutely no way around this energy density problem.....So they toss things like exotic matter and negative energy around, as a way to fool people.......

    • @dodgedemonsrtx
      @dodgedemonsrtx 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Piddlefoots u don't know s hit

  • @williamjames9515
    @williamjames9515 2 ปีที่แล้ว +124

    The difficult part is getting enough Dilithium Crystals.

    • @Visbalalam
      @Visbalalam 2 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      That's for warp drive, not impulse 😀

    • @Lennis01
      @Lennis01 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Impulse drives are powered my fusion reactors. Another handy thing to have if we could actually build it.

    • @Saint.questions
      @Saint.questions 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Exactly

    • @MasterMayhem78
      @MasterMayhem78 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Lennis01 Some have been built and actually work but only for a short time. The problem is containment of the plasma.

    • @gordonpeacman2126
      @gordonpeacman2126 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Lennis01
      Fission ....

  • @lordnk3698
    @lordnk3698 2 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    if we ever build a first starship ... we gotta to name it after Jim Woodward

    • @saxmidiman
      @saxmidiman 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Could the first Interstellar Starship be a "Woodie"?🤣🙄😎

    • @garypeatling7927
      @garypeatling7927 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Jim enterprise

    • @calebclunie4001
      @calebclunie4001 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm definitely distantly related to Mr. Fearn, but yes Jim Woodward deserves the credit.

    • @MrJdsenior
      @MrJdsenior 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@saxmidiman Just couldn't let it go, could ya? Funny, though, in a pedestrian sort of way. :-) Thumbed.

  • @giantclam1822
    @giantclam1822 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nuts.....until years later someone builds on the work.
    We went from horse and buggy to the moon in 130 years.

  • @robb4044
    @robb4044 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very interesting. I hope his gadget works, and I hope somebody gets it working soon, not only so we can travel in space, but also so he can see that his idea was valid and that he was on the right track.

  • @mr.stand_by6316
    @mr.stand_by6316 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    So...its a vibrator, that moves itself in space? Fascinating. 😊

  • @smking100
    @smking100 2 ปีที่แล้ว +116

    The university moved Jim to a quiet corner rather than fire him, just in case his idea has merit. I mean, he got a small grant from NASA, and money is money.

    • @fancifulfilly
      @fancifulfilly 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Only he squandered most of his NIAC grant for that last project on new toys for his lab. There was a pittance left over to pay his "research team". Of course that panned out zero. I think this latest project he and Heidi are working on is new. I wonder if NASA would pony up again. If this Mach effect engine has a chance of happening, they need a team of engineers, not physicists. This is not really their field of expertise.

    • @scubaguy007
      @scubaguy007 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It’s funny how education administrations respond to money.

    • @westnblu
      @westnblu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@fancifulfilly I beg to differ. Physics is the driver of major engineering feats. Just sayin

    • @daos3300
      @daos3300 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@fancifulfilly they need to prove the theory first which certainly is a job for theoretical physicists. if they manage that they'll have an endless supply of engineers.

  • @lynnealuebben1967
    @lynnealuebben1967 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I listened to the young man from NASA speak about how that would be groundbreaking, but you could tell he did not think it was possible. However he is too young to remember just how far we have come, how almost every Star Trek idea has become real in our lifetimes.

  • @tobiasboon4597
    @tobiasboon4597 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What happens in interstellar space? There's less gravity further between spaces. At least until another stable gravity source occurs (another star?).

  • @nautilosad6024
    @nautilosad6024 2 ปีที่แล้ว +86

    You have to love geeks. All they need is an idea, no matter how extreme, they'll find a way to make it happen if it inspires them.

    • @cedriceric9730
      @cedriceric9730 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Imagination is what sets us apart from animals
      Yes it's a geek superpower
      There is absolutely nothing naturally impossible if you give us geeks enough time

    • @OktavianiFriska
      @OktavianiFriska 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Agree, just put us a lot of money and our idea would be next breakthrough innovation that maybe can beat Einstein

    • @nixl3518
      @nixl3518 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's quite a statement there @@OktavianiFriska !!! Didn't anyone teach u humility when u were growing up, or is that one of u're geeky attributes that keeps u away from civilized society?
      Perhaps, judging from ur avatar, u still have a ways to go!

    • @leek6927
      @leek6927 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      nick are you saying that being smart/ a scientist makes you uncivilized?

    • @nixl3518
      @nixl3518 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@leek6927 your logic escapes me!

  • @welinder01
    @welinder01 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    I remember about a decade ago when Jim Woodward was trying to raise $60k to further refine the Mach drive concept. The same year Kim Kardashian earned $50 million. Everything wrong with our species in one single observation.

    • @wambamit344
      @wambamit344 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Lol

    • @mirroredvoid8394
      @mirroredvoid8394 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The US military budget is 700 billion dollars imagine if they recieved a fraction of their budget.

    • @mirroredvoid8394
      @mirroredvoid8394 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wouldn't need a militay budget if you build a warp drive and move to another planet far far away.

    • @MrJdsenior
      @MrJdsenior 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@mirroredvoid8394 Not really, I think you misunderstand human nature 101. Moving people somewhere else will only move wars somewhere else.

  • @jamesh8862
    @jamesh8862 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Irrespective of whether the Woodward effect turns out to be a dud or not, you have to admire the guy for putting a large part of his life into developing it. He found his purpose & that's something which sadly far too many people ever manage to come across.

  • @dumitrulangham1721
    @dumitrulangham1721 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If they can prove this works this will be greatest discovery since the light bulbs! If we are going to into deep space then need to explore seriously which technology could be considered for infant of interstellar travel!

  • @Jezee213
    @Jezee213 2 ปีที่แล้ว +212

    It's people like this that will move our world forward. I love this story.

    • @Piddlefoots
      @Piddlefoots 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      People like that just sap funding from much better science projects....... We need a sun, 10 times bigger than ours in a very small bottle to even come close to the energy levels needed to curve space-time fabric, THIS is what these dreamers ignore and fail to mention....... E=Mc² tells us there is absolutely no way around this energy density problem.....So they toss things like exotic matter and negative energy around, as a way to fool people.......

    • @Piddlefoots
      @Piddlefoots 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      No they wont, they will do only ONE thing, drain your tax system of Billions for ZERO result, wake up, 50 years havent even been back to moon, you folks are just tripping to fall for this fantasy, get grounded in real science, not what BS theorists say, they dont do the experiments, go ask a CERN scientist about this, they will LAUGH at you and palm it off, yea theory doesnt always mean we can do it, will be there reply, there is a reason I know this......

    • @Piddlefoots
      @Piddlefoots 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Its people like this that will send our society broke, for nothing at all..... Wake up and get grounded in REAL SCIENCE, not this fantasy........

  • @ryanaiden
    @ryanaiden 2 ปีที่แล้ว +70

    Jim totally looks like he could be the great great grandfather of Jean-Luc Picard.

    • @geokon3
      @geokon3 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      If his idea works, he could become!!

    • @Dalicaruncho
      @Dalicaruncho 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      But the actual actor STILL playing Picard, Sir Patrick Stewart, is in fact older than him :)

    • @ryanaiden
      @ryanaiden 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Still… in the timeline that would unravel I. ST, he would be the elder and Picard yet to be born.

    • @Dalicaruncho
      @Dalicaruncho 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@ryanaiden My brain hurts now…

  • @paulneilson6117
    @paulneilson6117 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Guys, in 1908 Minkowski predicted the photon has more momentum in a dielectric proportional to its index of refraction. This is demonstrated by experiments with lasers passing through dielectrics bouncing off mirrors.
    The photon drive aka the EMdrive exploits the fact that if you place a high index of refraction material at one end of a microwave cavity, more momentum is deposited on that end via radiation pressure than the metal only side. This imbalance of momentum in the closed system causes motion towards the dielectric end. Using superconductive metal for the cavity walls increases the efficiency.gravitate.
    Edit: why has this been blocked?

  • @jean-jacquesferry3814
    @jean-jacquesferry3814 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Science doesn't break magic, it reveals it.Thanks Jim for this shared pleasure 🤙🙂

  • @vidalvasquez1123
    @vidalvasquez1123 2 ปีที่แล้ว +69

    I like the fact that these scientist and engineers are very humble about it.

    • @Piddlefoots
      @Piddlefoots 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Because they know its TOTAL BS..... But a grant for Billions would be nice........Mr tax payer.... ???

    • @blockhead1899
      @blockhead1899 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Piddlefoots As if the government cares about your pathetic excuse for tax payments

    • @Piddlefoots
      @Piddlefoots ปีที่แล้ว

      @@blockhead1899 Dude pay attention, you obviously cant read properly, the TAX is about YOU the tax payer, and corporations getting grants to do BS that will never go anywhere, are nothing but a tax rip off, corporations getting YOUR TAX MONEY for things they should not...... Get it now mate ? And if you think that's rubbish explain the Us military block mate...GAMEOVER your simply wrong...... 1/3 of US economy internal, is nothing other than Military corporations, all paid by TAX MONEY ya genius..... So YES governments absolutely DO CARE about tax payments, in both directions....... Inbound and outbound.

  • @nelsonvallin3535
    @nelsonvallin3535 2 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    Amazing!!! To pursue one vision even though it's extremely unlikely to succeed or bring any immediate gains. Is a level resilience I wish to attain one day.

    • @neeneko
      @neeneko 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      careful what you wish for, it is the same mental trap that makes things like Nigerian scams work. People do not like being wrong, and once enough energy is sunk into something, no amount of facts will convince a person that they are wrong because they have invested their very sense of self in being right.
      People like woodward are not to be admired. They are not resilient, they have tied their idea to their identity and are trapped, for failing to believe in their idea is so psychotically devastating they will do anything to avoid it.

    • @nelsonvallin3535
      @nelsonvallin3535 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@neeneko Only the crazy ones keep going when all the metrics and all the data is going against them. 99% of fail, only 1% are lucky enough to be right. Despite the odds. But the 1% are the ones that change our reality. Being an entrepreneur or scientist you have to be comfortable with the likelihood that you will not make it. But you want it so bad you will risk it all anyway.

    • @MrJdsenior
      @MrJdsenior 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@neeneko "failing to believe in their idea is so psychotically devastating they will do anything to avoid it"
      Wow, you must have watched a different video than I did. From what I could see he is a guy that believes there may be some physical property of the universe that might be utilized for space ship drive. And he pointed out several times he definitely has his doubts...who wouldn't.
      And I think you maybe meant psychologically rather than psychotically devastating.

    • @neeneko
      @neeneko 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MrJdsenior yep, psychologically. ah autocorrect on a small screen.
      It isn't just the video, it is having rubbernecked this guy for years now. He has long since been dismissed by domain experts but has a strong in the fringe crowd and from time to time hooks mainstream sources like this one,.. enough to keep him validated.

  • @RonZoscak
    @RonZoscak 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This looks suspiciously like the Dean drive, but with a piezoelectric transducer instead of a solenoid. I predict the only result will be the worlds most expensive vibrator and, possibly, a cease-and-desist from ViacomCBS.

  • @greggary7217
    @greggary7217 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    History is replete with unloved theory & experiment that are (sometimes much) later discovered to open the door to something new.
    Regardless of diligence Im not sure that a guy willing to place odds on the success or failure of a trial should be in charge of the trial.
    Unless of course he’s claiming to understand the workings of the gargantuan portion of the universe current science is completely mystified by.
    No matter outcome tho, all the respect to Woodward for his perseverance & gratitude to those who have joined the project.

  • @PhillipAmthor
    @PhillipAmthor 2 ปีที่แล้ว +93

    What a cool man doing all by himself and even paying for it. This is how the ideal grandpa looks like you may not like it but this is how peak performance and being badass looks like.

    • @steady3459
      @steady3459 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      COMMON WE HAVE ZERO POINT ENERGY THE CABAL ARE HORDING !

    • @RickMyBalls
      @RickMyBalls 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      What. What it looks like.

  • @Wolf88888
    @Wolf88888 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    It's not really an 'impulse engine' per 'Star Trek'; my understanding is that the impulse engines on starships in Star Trek were actually ion engines. This is more of a slow warp drive.

    • @JohnDlugosz
      @JohnDlugosz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      IF the impulse engines used any kind of normal Newtonian reaction, there would not be enough fuel on board as it would necessarily outweigh the ship.
      In an _early_ novel (1970's) the author explained that it's "I.M. Pulse" which indeed sounds more like this video.

    • @Wolf88888
      @Wolf88888 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JohnDlugosz I don't claim to know. I've been kind of a 'Trekkie' all my life, and my understanding has always been that the ion impulse engines were for relatively short, low-speed travel within a star system, while the warp engines were for true interstellar travel.

    • @alext5497
      @alext5497 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      There is nothing 'warpy' about this drive.

    • @ArchangelChi
      @ArchangelChi 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JohnDlugosz That's why they were equipped with hydrogen collectors to scoop hydrogen gas from open space to be available for the ion impulse engines and the secondary fusion reactors

  • @mariodasilva8729
    @mariodasilva8729 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    As an avid viewer of almost all the series of Star Trek movies and TV, it would be very advisable for the Space agencies involved in designing Warp engines to enable communications satellites at various Lagrange points in the Solar system to act as communication relays when craft finally experiment with these Warp engines. After any Warp experience is successful, these craft require to maintain communication that they were successful, otherwise the lack of confirmation of success will deem them Lost in Space!

  • @coreyc47
    @coreyc47 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Could the effect you're searching for be amplified if the vibration sources achieved resonance with the base they are mounted to as well as each other?? & by adjusting the frequency ever so slightly in front of & behind the resonant frequency I believe control of direction can be achieved as well! If fact you could stear the thing!

    • @jfrtbikgkdhjbeep9974
      @jfrtbikgkdhjbeep9974 ปีที่แล้ว

      help 'em out Corey ... get together with such a project

  • @Warrenwalker30
    @Warrenwalker30 2 ปีที่แล้ว +112

    They honestly need to bring in more people because when engineering something new there's one outlook or perception from each person if you bring an outsider in he can give a brand new perspective and ideas to the project that just might bring it to life

    • @MIHMediaInc
      @MIHMediaInc 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      With how science has been compartmentalised that's unlikely to happen.

    • @Warrenwalker30
      @Warrenwalker30 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@MIHMediaInc yep because your always ridiculed if your the one that comes up with the new theory or discovery until it's deeply proven correct ..but until then they call you crazy

    • @MIHMediaInc
      @MIHMediaInc 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@Warrenwalker30 right on

    • @fahimp3
      @fahimp3 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Warrenwalker30 But there is new tech that is always coming out... I don't think people dismiss this as much as the stereotype goes since they got a govt agency looking into it...

    • @lostgleammedia
      @lostgleammedia 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      more Women brought into these things.. who knows what will be discovered with an even more brand new perspective

  • @daniellynn3240
    @daniellynn3240 2 ปีที่แล้ว +82

    I love that even though he might not be around he's still trying to help out Humanity

    • @invertedxtrovert
      @invertedxtrovert 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      That’s how you get a wing of a University named after you.

    • @DJShadesUK
      @DJShadesUK 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Someone else posted this ancient Greek proverb, but its too apt not to repeat: "society grows great when old men plant trees in whose shade they shall never sit"

    • @mrbacchus6127
      @mrbacchus6127 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      For a scientist like him there would be no greater lifetime achievement.

  • @paddybm3245
    @paddybm3245 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

    People who have the courage to dream have my utter respect

  • @KorAllRBare
    @KorAllRBare ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I always imagined the Impulse drive being based on a rail Gun with a twist, The twist being the mass normally tethered to Earth is actually
    a collection of Modules briefly electromagnetically tied to repulse a given module with a reverse Pole to it, ergo thrusting it forward.
    So in a sense via flipping the electromagnetic Poles to several Modules, The main mass is shifted to accelerate one module that is flipped out of phase, Once Near to Light Speed is attained the entire set of modules electromagnetic Fields can be switched off.
    If you understand the above then an array could be utilised so that the entire Mass may be accelerated to any direction..

  • @sanjitdaniel4588
    @sanjitdaniel4588 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You can clearly see the generational divide here. The older guys are more experimental and bold. The young guy in the end is skeptical, restrained, a bit sarcastic and prone to going more theoretical. The later has given us very little over the past century while experimental physicists made huge progress in period before that. We have been stuck in a rut for a long time now with quantum physics, string theory etc which seem to have hit dead ends. The LHC is a refreshing move and unless we do more tinkering, more experiments we will never find the not-so-obvious. Trying to model everything is not the way forward.

    • @duality4y
      @duality4y 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Just because one Young guy is shown to be like that here means all of them are like that right.

  • @dial8702
    @dial8702 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    True people, devoting their limited lives to improve and evolve humanity so that the future ones can live as long as the universe exists. Not looking for profit, looking for eternity in a history book. A big cheers to them.

  • @Gargamoth
    @Gargamoth หลายเดือนก่อน

    Pulse engine sounds really cool, then warp engine,then the shields and tractor beams

  • @charleshawkins699
    @charleshawkins699 ปีที่แล้ว

    The term impulse was used on the Star Trek show. Because they were trying to emulate a sea voyage or the propeller on a ship. In most cases. It was a science fiction show trying to capture the essence of navy ship operations. In many respects.
    If you’re talking about impulse drives. In terms of making science fiction a reality. There are many different types of postulated theories. The most basic being stored mechanical energy in weights.
    Where a force and rapid stop can be applied in a zero G environment. The effect is like gently pushing a weight away from you attached to a rope. That is let out a significant ways away. Then rapidly reeled in. Giving a slight forward momentum towards the direction the weight was thrown.
    It’s something meant to move slowly in zero gravity. In an effort to move out of the way or towards something like another ship or space station.

  • @TheNefastor
    @TheNefastor 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Here's the thing : we _want_ to believe it's possible to travel to distant starts, but the universe is under no obligation to allow it. There is always the possibility that interstellar travel is in fact impossible (at practical speeds). That's what bums me out the most. On the other hand, it also means we can never be invaded by space aliens...

    • @incription
      @incription 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      well, not really. What is a practical speed? You get a fusion drive with some insanely efficient ion thruster and accelerate to close the speed of light, time dilation starts taking effect and your relative speed has now increased beyond the speed of light - you can go anywhere in the universe in a second if you are fast enough, but you dont have to break the laws of physics. And aliens could totally invade us, maybe they started a million years ago

    • @dschledermann
      @dschledermann 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, we definitely have to be most sceptical about the things we want to be true. Interstellar travel will never be a thing. At least not in the way it's portrayed in scifi. I find it plausible that civilisation (provided we don't exterminate ourselves within the next couple of centuries) eventually reach other stars and spread through the galaxy, but it will be a slow one way ticket.

    • @TexanUSMC8089
      @TexanUSMC8089 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@incription There was a time when scientists said it was impossible to go faster than the speed of sound. A hundred years ago my Iphone would have been beyond comprehension. I admire people that aren't satisfied with the status quo.

    • @deusexaethera
      @deusexaethera 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Interstellar travel is entirely feasible with current technology. The PROBLEM is that humans don't live long enough and also get bored too easily. We evolved on a ball of poop-covered-rock that a person could walk around at least once in their lifetime if they were well prepared and very dedicated, but that ball of poop-covered-rock is infinitesimally small compared to the universe, and our biology and psychology have not evolved any means of coping with it. Here's a fun fact: If Proxima Centauri were as close as the Moon is, the Moon would have to be 11.6 feet away -- close enough for you to bump your head on it if you climbed a ladder. That's how big the universe is.

    • @missingno2401
      @missingno2401 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@deusexaethera if proxima centauri was as close as the moon is a lot of people would die

  • @bluementor6466
    @bluementor6466 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    I thank Bloomberg and this Man for all of their hard work.
    Thank you.

  • @davehamrick5028
    @davehamrick5028 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Quack says the duck. Impulse drive in Star Trek was an ion drive. No new quackery needed

  • @ALARICFILMS
    @ALARICFILMS หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don’t really care if you are right or wrong: The simple fact of your persistence is a great achievement for Mankind already: Bravo! 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼

  • @brandonsmith3060
    @brandonsmith3060 2 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    Either way, this work will prove a path is viable or not…That is valuable to science.

    • @dbmail545
      @dbmail545 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      As "science" beclowns itself over Climate Change and the plan-demic, this kind of flat earth type BS is taken seriously by more people every day.

    • @brandonsmith3060
      @brandonsmith3060 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@dbmail545 so what do you do to make a difference for the future? Are you out contributing to make change or keep it the same and hide away in a bunker naysaying others sacrifice?

    • @brandonsmith3060
      @brandonsmith3060 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @Peter Evans the links to the research is in the description…Didn’t notice braces, but I’m sure a dentist can solve it. Still any person out there working to push science is a value to it…Especially when it comes to humanity expanding into space.

    • @brandonsmith3060
      @brandonsmith3060 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @Peter Evans it’s pretty impressive they made it to phase II thus far in an Innovative Advanced Concepts for NASA…How far has your R&D made it?

    • @JNCressey
      @JNCressey 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Peter Evans, "No mention of where this energy is coming from to power the crystal". They did mention where the energy comes from to power the crystal. At 9:20 they say a nuclear battery would be used to power them.

  • @Miked1332
    @Miked1332 2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    This is why I believe we take 1% if the US military budget to fund wild ideas like this.

    • @cruss4612
      @cruss4612 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We already spend more than 1% of the defense budget on research. That's only 6 billion. The defense budget isn't even the largest expenditure by the federal government. Health and Human Services spends 51% of the budget by themselves. Maybe we should take 1% of that and reallocate it. That'll be about 14-20 billion.

    • @ArchangelChi
      @ArchangelChi 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      They already spend WAY more than that, at DARPA and a plethora of black budget R&D projects

    • @davidowens9597
      @davidowens9597 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Much of the military budget does fund cutting-edge research like this.

    • @circlebodo991
      @circlebodo991 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@davidowens9597 yeah but they wont tell ya. so its useless

  • @mrnobody2873
    @mrnobody2873 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    It occurs to me that if you can attach a material that has a resonant frequency in multiples of the oscillation frequency, you could actually scale up the device and move it to an easier to detect range.

  • @RaymondBelec
    @RaymondBelec ปีที่แล้ว

    The "MAC principle" (Maximum Acceleration Constant) is a theoretical principle of gravity that suggests that the maximum acceleration that a spacecraft can withstand is constant, regardless of its size or mass. It proposes that the maximum acceleration that a human can withstand is 9.8m/s² (1g), and this limit applies to any spacecraft, regardless of its size or mass.
    The principle is used in the design of interstellar travel, specifically in the design of propulsion systems for interstellar spacecraft. According to the MAC principle, the maximum acceleration that a spacecraft can withstand is constant, so to accelerate a spacecraft to high speeds over long distances, the propulsion system must be able to provide a constant acceleration over a long period of time.
    It's important to note that the MAC principle is not a well-established one and it is not supported by mainstream scientific research. The human body is not able to withstand high acceleration for a long period of time, and the concept of a constant acceleration that applies to any spacecraft, regardless of its size or mass, is not supported by current scientific understanding of physics.
    Currently, there is no known propulsion system that would be able to accelerate a spacecraft to high speeds over long distances and overcome the limitations of special and general relativity, which would make interstellar travel impossible for humans, however it could be argued that we do have the technology to create a genetic/synthetic lifeform to pilot the craft. JMIO :)

  • @TalenGryphon
    @TalenGryphon 2 ปีที่แล้ว +63

    Video: "It's called the Mega Drive"
    My brain: S E G A

    • @NoSuRReNDeR001
      @NoSuRReNDeR001 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      I was thinking..."The Mega Drive, but Sega couldn't even get past Saturn" lol !

    • @guywithknife
      @guywithknife 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@NoSuRReNDeR001 hahaha genius

    • @MiguelAngelLS
      @MiguelAngelLS 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@NoSuRReNDeR001 but could cast dreams.

  • @PK-tt5kk
    @PK-tt5kk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    It always inspires me when I see people at his age working in science.

  • @crewtheaftermath4105
    @crewtheaftermath4105 ปีที่แล้ว

    ..I kinda teared up when it moved :) Im 54 and think i want to dedicate the rest of my life to their research! and I dont even know anything about it. Id just bring the coffee every day and learn till i caught up but I think they are actually onto impulse engines like for real. This isgood science!

  • @jumpieva
    @jumpieva 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    we need more guys like this. also why exactly is the smaller scale important?