Metamodern Spirituality | UTOK and Metamodern Alchemy (w/ Gregg Henriques)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 9

  • @GerhardHoeberth
    @GerhardHoeberth 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Transjective ontology is a fascinating and necessary step in order to understand knowledge and being as a dynamic process that sees subject and object in a deeper, mutual relationship. This perspective opens up new possibilities for thinking about reality and cognition that go far beyond the classical subject-object thinking. I find it particularly impressive how it counteracts the reductionist tendencies of many traditional models of thinking and creates space for a complex, evolutionary view. It is inspiring to see such approaches from several sides, developing in a direction that I believe offers a necessary basis for a deeper understanding of our world and our consciousness. I myself have advocated similar approaches in my books and find it stimulating to compare my view with like-minded people. The challenges of the 21st century require alternative perspectives on reality.

    • @InterfaceGuhy
      @InterfaceGuhy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Totally! It’s the Unified which comes before any Theory

    • @InterfaceGuhy
      @InterfaceGuhy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This was phenomenal gents. Congrats on the book..
      I hear familiar songs in your stories, Gregg.
      Thanks for the explicit nod at 21:50 😉

  • @JasenRobillard
    @JasenRobillard 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Conforming grip ✅. Well done both of you - I’m looking forward to reading UTOK in this beautiful tome.

  • @IsaiahF22
    @IsaiahF22 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Greg and Brendan, this is fantastic - felt it 'click' and felt my affective field light up with meaning as reality cohered in an inclusive, transjective onto-epistemological frame. Love it, and have ordered the book to get more into it. This is definitely needed for so many people, and would alleviate so much suffering if this became more established and metabolised.
    I spoke about this recently to someone reputed for his 'wisdom', and realised that night (which was somewhat sleepless because of it) how nihilistic his fundamental relation to reality was - fundamentally, he didn't believe reality could be contacted, and used that as a way, I think, to justify not taking responsibility in his life. I don't know why I'm bringing this up in relation to the above, but it seems to fit - as this is where a lot of intellectual types are at. Below that (not that it's really hierarchical), you get the masses who just don't want to think about these issues - but I think eventually even knowing there is a frame for reality, that it *can* be known, will provide them comfort, in the same way religion typically does.
    It is a frame that thus affords people precisely the amount of participation with reality they want to have.
    So beautiful, Greg - thank you for your work.

  • @macwildkat4917
    @macwildkat4917 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Enjoyed this. Very interested in learning more. (Got the book, too.)

  • @zemiFTW
    @zemiFTW 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is so great

  • @eqapo
    @eqapo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    28:58 square up 🦍