Combat-Greyhound BF4 does amazing for models... if the setting wasn't so damn convoluted it would have been incredibly immersive. Shooting at obscured shapes in the distance...
Yeah i know it sounds like battlefield is more realistic but thats not true because sounds are more muffled and heavy and they dont spread through the enviroment.
The guns from bf4 look to floaty in their animations, insurgency has a crispness and snap to theirs, both games are good. Sounds really depend because insurgency had sound mods
Now THIS is a competition. I have to go with BF4 because of the firing sounds and how lackluster Insurgency's animations are. But they both have amazing animations.
The sound are exactly the same in bf4 and the bf4 animation is so shitty and robotic... how can you say that insurgency have more shit animation than bf4?!
@@mrgreenfr6216 Bf4 sounds depend on location and its not that robotic. BF4 is more arcady and its hard to implement varying levels of dexterity with getting things like mags and inserting it into guns to make it feel more human so I'm fine if its robotic
Insurgency's animations are slow, like the soldier isn't in a combat situation. He thinks he has all day to reload the weapon. The Battlefield animations look very quick, practiced, and appropriate for the situation.
@@EvanG529 no its actually a good reaload animation realistic even in a combat situation, bf4 animation are sooooo robotic (and too fast for a slow moment) ...
One thing that's always bothered me about your videos is that you showcase the Battlefield 4 weapons on that beach. At that location, you lose a lot of the echo effect from the gunshot. Which makes them sound very short and puny. Overall I love all of your videos but I just wanted to make that point.
Well at least you can hear the sounds in that place. If you ever watched pc gaming videos he records the sounds for BF4 on that Pakistan or whatever it was map in the city In the open road and you literally hear only echo and almost not any sounds L I T E R A L L Y
Sorry but i just love too much the echo spreading trough the world and bouncing off ground or buildings even if they are immaginary, and the change between different areas... it so satisfying to hear a second clap after you fire. And the fact that some guns are so loud that your ears get slightly deaf for half a second is a nice touch. Even the animations are too calm in insurgency even if they are of better quality, in reality you don't slowly drag your hand to carefully reach for the mechanism you just quickly put your hand there.
since both games are very accurate with sounds in the way they record them, so it's not a proper comparison if one is shooting long range into the ocean and one is shooting point blank into dirt.
I'm a bit confused by SKS and it's magazine in both games... afaik, SKS is feeded by stripper clip, and can be converted to use modified AK mags or brand new mags designed for use in SKS... None of those were in any of games, especially in Insurgency, the mag looks like ordinary AK mag... Am I missing something?
I don't know how people say that insurgency is better... The graphics sounds and animations are way better and more realistic Edit: just because insurgency is louder doesn't make it better
Gameplay wise, Insurgency is honestly loads better. Realistic recoil and manual player input to compensate for it, slower animations make people think twice before dumping rounds on someone. If louder doesn't make it better, then graphics don't make it better either.
Some guns are also portrayed better in Insurgency. The EBR in Insurgency shows the bolt locking back after the last shot, or how the bolt-actions reload an extra round if reloaded midway through the clip (e.g. reloading at three rounds makes the operator load three rounds instead of two as the chambered round is ejected)
With battlefield 4, the reloads are so unsatisfactory with how smooth they are and I feel like insurgency does a better job with them. They make it rougher and more firm, which adds on a sense of realism to it. Although shooting the guns on the other hand, it's an entirely different story. I feel like they both do a great job with how the guns look and feel while shooting, and the sound design in both games are very well done. The graphics, reflections, and lighting are much much better in battlefield 4, although for insurgency, the testing was done in a desert area, so I don't entirely know how to compare The graphics with a wetter-seeming area to a completely dry wasteland. The sounds in battlefield, however, I feel are superior because of the echo and clarity of the gunshots. In insurgency, the M249 was just loud and annoying. Most of them sounded as if you were in more of an enclosed space than if you were outdoors. Although, I do love what insurgency did with the explosives, because in the audio you could hear your player make a cut off shout as if they were flinching because they were too close to the explosive, such as a grenade. I absolutely love the attention to detail they have put in. Although dice has put that feature in Battlefield 1, it's number 4 that we're comparing. Overall, both games have great qualities that make both games seem realistic in their own way. I see what both have achieved, and if all of the great qualities came together in one game, I would consider it a masterpiece.
Why thr fuck are you even comparing a new gun like an AK12 with an old AK74? Why are you comparing an newer SKS with an older SKS? AK12U vs AK74U? Whats the purpose? Why?
Хуйня ентот ваш сандсторм. Как подвезут оптимизацию звоните. А так на 1050 ti еле как на средних 40 ФПС это никуда не можно. И кстати ходе мой воркшоп!? Брайтсайда на вас неть! А где ББ и экспансивки!?
San Disk well the maps and everything else look 100x more realistic than insurgency anyways. insurgency has the realistic damage mechanics and gun recoil but graphically the maps and everything lack massively..
Honestly I just like BF4's animations better. Quick, precise, and a little flashy. Realistic isn't always satisfying. Edit: Also I don't like the idea of the part that's supposed to rest on your shoulder literally being on your chin.
Battlefield 4 & Insurgency
M9 0:01 & 0:16
M1911 0:37 & 0:50
UMP-45 1:11 & 1:31
M16A4 1:56 & 2:14
M4 2:43 & M4A1 3:02
M39 EMR 3:27 & M14 EBR 3:50
SKS 4:14 & 4:38
AK-12 5:03 & AK-74 5:24
AKU-12 5:50 & AKS-74U 6:13
M40A5 6:38 & M40A1 7:00
M249 7:32 & 7:56
RPK 8:42 & 9:04
RPG-7V2 9:38 & RPG-7 9:53
M320 10:02 & M203 10:12
Frag Grenade 10:29 & 10:38
Thank you
Nope
Vladimir Makarov Uhhhhhh No Russian?
Funny
u guys meant insurgency is better by gun sounds right ?
Animations: Insurgency
Sounds: Battlefield
Agreed.
Not all of the animations are better in insurgency tho I'd say it's
50/50
Sounds are much realistic in insurgency but that doesn't make em better or much satisfying
@Dance of the dragons and The storm of swords bruh stop it I get that a lot...
I'll fucking change my name already
Both are great games
Nice work the best weapon showcases and comparisions and evolutions on yt
Insurgency animations are really smooth but I love battlefields animations because the way the gun sways and shakes.
I looooove battlefield, but insurgency is waaaaaay Better
in what way
Lol and because it's realistic it means it's better?
Loooooool
it's his opinion
@@axb3542 it's a weapon combarison, so yeah it does mean that it's better.
Insurgency is not more realistic.
Insurgency: ultra realistic(hardcore)
Battlefield: competitive(Normal)
Insurgency got that real recoil.
BadPokemon Productions because it’s a tactical realistic shooter
Bf4: Sounds and Textures
Insurgency: Animations
The models are some times better in BF4 sometimes in Insurgency. So both wins :D
Combat-Greyhound BF4 does amazing for models... if the setting wasn't so damn convoluted it would have been incredibly immersive. Shooting at obscured shapes in the distance...
Insurgency & Battlefield
9/11-"Too Much Guns"
-IGN
Yeah i know it sounds like battlefield is more realistic but thats not true because sounds are more muffled and heavy and they dont spread through the enviroment.
The guns from bf4 look to floaty in their animations, insurgency has a crispness and snap to theirs, both games are good. Sounds really depend because insurgency had sound mods
I like both!
Now THIS is a competition. I have to go with BF4 because of the firing sounds and how lackluster Insurgency's animations are. But they both have amazing animations.
The sound are exactly the same in bf4 and the bf4 animation is so shitty and robotic... how can you say that insurgency have more shit animation than bf4?!
@@mrgreenfr6216 Bf4 sounds depend on location and its not that robotic. BF4 is more arcady and its hard to implement varying levels of dexterity with getting things like mags and inserting it into guns to make it feel more human so I'm fine if its robotic
Insurgency's animations are slow, like the soldier isn't in a combat situation. He thinks he has all day to reload the weapon. The Battlefield animations look very quick, practiced, and appropriate for the situation.
@@EvanG529 no its actually a good reaload animation realistic even in a combat situation, bf4 animation are sooooo robotic (and too fast for a slow moment) ...
Too fast for a slow moment? It's a first-person shooter! There are no slow moments! The "robotic" animations of BF4 are quick and precise.
One thing that's always bothered me about your videos is that you showcase the Battlefield 4 weapons on that beach. At that location, you lose a lot of the echo effect from the gunshot. Which makes them sound very short and puny. Overall I love all of your videos but I just wanted to make that point.
Well at least you can hear the sounds in that place.
If you ever watched pc gaming videos he records the sounds for BF4 on that Pakistan or whatever it was map in the city
In the open road and you literally hear only echo and almost not any sounds
L I T E R A L L Y
@@axb3542 Nah you can hear the sounds but the echo from the dense city amplifies the echo
@@axb3542 pakistan? Really?
@@100500daniel I meant shangai
I haven't played the game in a long time
Insurgency got the fire rate for the M4 wrong
Sorry but i just love too much the echo spreading trough the world and bouncing off ground or buildings even if they are immaginary, and the change between different areas... it so satisfying to hear a second clap after you fire. And the fact that some guns are so loud that your ears get slightly deaf for half a second is a nice touch. Even the animations are too calm in insurgency even if they are of better quality, in reality you don't slowly drag your hand to carefully reach for the mechanism you just quickly put your hand there.
Like your work man it's amazing
Our supreme lord, Mr.Brightside, we are not worthy of your greatness !
To be honest i dont think comparing semi-auto/burst to full-auto weapons is a good idea..
since both games are very accurate with sounds in the way they record them, so it's not a proper comparison if one is shooting long range into the ocean and one is shooting point blank into dirt.
When Battlefield and Tarkov love each other very much...!
I'm a bit confused by SKS and it's magazine in both games... afaik, SKS is feeded by stripper clip, and can be converted to use modified AK mags or brand new mags designed for use in SKS... None of those were in any of games, especially in Insurgency, the mag looks like ordinary AK mag... Am I missing something?
Both of those magazines were correct. Also, it's "fed", not fucking "feeded"
Bf4:models,some of the sounds,and graphics
Insurgency:animations and some other
Insurgency frag effects are a way better
Insurgency certainly has the sweeter reload animations and associated sounds. The weapon fire sounds are up for debate 🤔
The only problem is they reuse the pistol sound from the previous games. And all pistols sound the same despite the caliber.
what
@@a.hauptmann8798 yeah the bf animation and sound are so robotic and weak...
There are sound mods for the game and are easy to get from the steam workshop, I've seen entire sound conversion packs for bf4 sounds lol
I don't know why I started liking insurgency more than battlefeild 4 and 1 after watching some insurgency videos
Insurgency had better accuracy to the actual weapons, but battlefield looks better.
Both are good
All of my pants are white from Insurgency's reloads. They are so goddamn sexy.
These are my two favorite games.
why youre testing sniper rifle without scope?
Because the actual gun dont have a scope on it...
Insurgency recoil is crazy
'cos it's tactical realistic shooter
Masliny Poimal but it‘s too extreme
+Tkcb 2799 play pubg the recoil is even crazier
Yolo Team Yeah Ik😂😂
@@yoloteam9513 wtf dude. Pubg recoil is too ez. What do you mean?
BF4 has more style put into those reload animations and for some reason, I mimick those animations on my fucking school stationaries.
I need help.
Insurgency recoil is bit exaggerated in some weapons.
Both are really good games but B4 recoil kinesthetic still better in my opinion.
To me it seems like in bf4 they do a little recoil control, but in insurgency they do nothing.
Insurgency in animation and reloads. Good ass shit. Battlefield 4 is better in weapon models and sound though, but I prefer animations over anything
you are the best TH-camr.Support tou
Insurgency=Can't ride vehicle
Battlefield=can ride vehicle
S a n d s t o r m
@@Govrin. R P G
I don't know how people say that insurgency is better... The graphics sounds and animations are way better and more realistic
Edit: just because insurgency is louder doesn't make it better
depends on realism.
Gameplay wise, Insurgency is honestly loads better. Realistic recoil and manual player input to compensate for it, slower animations make people think twice before dumping rounds on someone. If louder doesn't make it better, then graphics don't make it better either.
Some guns are also portrayed better in Insurgency. The EBR in Insurgency shows the bolt locking back after the last shot, or how the bolt-actions reload an extra round if reloaded midway through the clip (e.g. reloading at three rounds makes the operator load three rounds instead of two as the chambered round is ejected)
GUNS OF GAME BLACK PS2
PREACH THE GOSPEL OF OUR LORD AND SAVIOR BLACK FOR XBOX!
With battlefield 4, the reloads are so unsatisfactory with how smooth they are and I feel like insurgency does a better job with them. They make it rougher and more firm, which adds on a sense of realism to it. Although shooting the guns on the other hand, it's an entirely different story. I feel like they both do a great job with how the guns look and feel while shooting, and the sound design in both games are very well done. The graphics, reflections, and lighting are much much better in battlefield 4, although for insurgency, the testing was done in a desert area, so I don't entirely know how to compare The graphics with a wetter-seeming area to a completely dry wasteland. The sounds in battlefield, however, I feel are superior because of the echo and clarity of the gunshots. In insurgency, the M249 was just loud and annoying. Most of them sounded as if you were in more of an enclosed space than if you were outdoors. Although, I do love what insurgency did with the explosives, because in the audio you could hear your player make a cut off shout as if they were flinching because they were too close to the explosive, such as a grenade. I absolutely love the attention to detail they have put in. Although dice has put that feature in Battlefield 1, it's number 4 that we're comparing. Overall, both games have great qualities that make both games seem realistic in their own way. I see what both have achieved, and if all of the great qualities came together in one game, I would consider it a masterpiece.
strong disagree i like the smoothness
Nice man awesome
It's ok, these weapon could be same or not!
Bf4 weapons sounds 👍
Insurgency weapons are better, but Battlefield viewmodel is better, it looks that actually he is aiming, not firing from the hip like Insurgency.
Because you are shooting from the actual hip in Insurgency
I love Battlefield 4 but many of the guns in Insurgency are better looking and sounding, especially with the reloads
which is rather embarrassing since it's on source
Remember kids, nobody gives a shit if you're first!
Why thr fuck are you even comparing a new gun like an AK12 with an old AK74? Why are you comparing an newer SKS with an older SKS? AK12U vs AK74U? Whats the purpose? Why?
BF4 is robotic
Kalifta it's an old game. Calm your tits
Old game? Lmfao you're acting like the game is from 2003/2004
It's actually from fucking 2013 how old is it?
>2013
>Old game
First Far Cry from 2004 feels better...
Insurgency is lackluster.
@@EvanG529 and you are a nonsence bf fan kiddo
insurgency looks 2008 bf4 still has good graphics compared to todays newest games
MouldyUsername well look at insurgency sandstorm it’s way more realistic and a upgrade to the original insurgency btw insurgency was made in 2014
MouldyUsername insurgency was made with the source engine
Sandstorm !!!!
this isn't sandstorm
Zavau.X dumbass..
Хуйня ентот ваш сандсторм. Как подвезут оптимизацию звоните. А так на 1050 ti еле как на средних 40 ФПС это никуда не можно. И кстати ходе мой воркшоп!? Брайтсайда на вас неть! А где ББ и экспансивки!?
Insurgency by a mile, I like your videos also
Insurgency vs insurgency (the mod)
The mod is crazy is good
Animations insurgency but sounds bf4
Darude "Insurgency" Sandstorm
gun sounds and reloads are better in insurgency and its polish game,but bf have best gameplay!
Just no... its just random bullshittery
What'Battlefield 4 100%?
Clearly BF4 has better graphics, but as usual, the NWI game wins in sound design.
Insurgency wins cause it don't need dlc's to be a great game
Better Than COD
Im playing bouth of the games and i love them bouth😍
Insurgency all the way.
Holy shit realistic game v.s realistic game
BF4 a realistic game
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL.
@@Simon-dd7rh well...not that much but still kinda...a bit..just for their guns. Wouldnt say realistic for the rest
BF4 is semi realistic lol
@@m4j0r3x bf4 is not even realistic... AT ALL
San Disk well the maps and everything else look 100x more realistic than insurgency anyways. insurgency has the realistic damage mechanics and gun recoil but graphically the maps and everything lack massively..
Honestly I just like BF4's animations better.
Quick, precise, and a little flashy.
Realistic isn't always satisfying.
Edit: Also I don't like the idea of the part that's supposed to rest on your shoulder literally being on your chin.
insurgency's gun models and sounds are better but all other graphics are poopy
Probably because its on a 2004/2003 engine(source)
too much echo in bf
Insurgency better animation while bt4 has better sound
Sound are all the same in bf4... how could you say that sound are better
i think Insurgency is harder
In insurgency u get shot 1 bullet u ded lol thats way insurgency is realistic in COMBAT
Insurgency is sexy
*NOW EFT!*
Insurgency look more realistic
remember, insurgency made by source engine from half-life 2
Insurgency is like anime - watch it one time, can't stop anymore
Should’ve done bf3 instead, would’ve match the maps as well
NotificationSquad
Chevere
Slatemate
Go warface
Bf4: tskikikikikikikikikikiki
Insurgency: BURATATATATATATATATATA
THats the differrnce
BF4 sounds depend on location like irl
I hate the UMP-45 in BF4..
bf4 win
4th comment
Steveus Prime literally no one gives a shit, you failed abortion
R/whoooosh.
It was about time I use this stupid fucking comment on some triggered boi
Bf best game
No... its just a random bullshittery with absolutely no sence
@@mrgreenfr6216 Battlefield better that stupid game
Squad is waaaaaay better than both of them
Thanh niên đi đâu cũng gặp :v
để t lên pornhub hay xnxx xem có gặp không nhé, chờ đấy.
An tâm, ko có :v
yeah right
@@player_1907 its a fact