Battlefield 2042 vs Battlefield 5 - Direct Comparison! Attention to Detail & Graphics! PC ULTRA 4K
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 พ.ย. 2021
- Battlefield 2042 vs Battlefield 5 - Direct Comparison! Attention to Detail & Graphics! PC ULTRA 4K
In this video you will see a graphic and gameplay comparison between the new Battlefield 2042 and Battlefield 5.
Both games are being played on the PC at their highest graphical settings.
My PC SPECS:
MB: MSI Z390-A PRO
CPU: i7 9700K
RAM: HyperX Fury Black 16GB DDR4 3200MHz
GPU: GTX 1080 TI
SSD: ADATA Ultimate SU650 480GB
Thank you for watching!!!
#Battlefield5 #Battlefield2042 #Battlefield5vsBattlefield2042 - เกม
![THE TOYS x NONT TANONT - ดอกไม้ที่รอฝน (spring) [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/pPa1d5cC8M4/mqdefault.jpg)
i already knew bfv was gonna hold up. the attention to detail in that game was so fucking crazy
True, but not at launch. BF2042 has been out for only a few days, and it's being compared to a game that's been out for a few years. There is no comparison.
@@ScruffysServo the attention to detail was always in BFV launch though, dice only bug fixed and added weapons and maps after launch
@@ScruffysServo even on launch battlefield v was still a better game than battlefield 2042. Before they started messing with the visuals because of visibility complaints battlefield v maps looked one million times better than these battlefield 2042 ones
Yeah because a product should capitalize on the previous entry, the idea is to use the previous game as base and build on it, not completely rip it apart and start what seems from scratch. If a new game that is 3 years younger comes out looking worse than the last game then that's a problem
@@ScruffysServo watch bfv alpha
Now it's the same situation as CoD, a new game comes out, suddenly the previous one is better even though people hated it...
BF5 is a finished product.
BF2042 isn't.
BFV has had the time necessary for best possible gameplay and general quality of everything and I’m sure overtime so will bf2042 but it’s already of to a decent start if you ask me
But vanguard is way better than CW but I would rather be playing BFV or even Hardline
@product Yep and those games were buggy asf then afterwards it became a really good game
@product Hopefully.
Damn... Battlefield 5 truly had the best destruction yet. Sad how games are going back instead of forward...
Bad Company 2
@@antoniowhite2773 That games destruction is nothing compared to BF5...
If the maps were as destructive there would be no Cover at all. If you play Portal you can see that the engine is well able to get as good destruction
@@antoniowhite2773 that was the best destruction to date
@@catalyst9808 You can put C4 on the walls , explode and level a building killing everyone inside on BFBC2. Never gain.
I’ve loved bf5 from the beginning. If it had more gun customization it would have been perfect imo. I wish with 2042 they would have stuck with 64 players and just added and made that experience better
Tbf I wish they added, small conquest with 64 players or make it go fucking crazy and have small conquest with 128 player
@Bravo Six Only thing bad about BF5 gunplay is TTK is too slow especially at ranges. The damage drop off is insane.
But people complained about BF5 gunplay so they went back to BF1 mixed with BF4 random deviation lol
@@tobiashull1781 If they really want this game to suceed, they'll definitely make modes like that. Would be totally awesome.
Many BF games have added content after they fixed the bugs. BF3 had so many expansions.
yep, 128 sounded cool on paper but the way they executed it doesn't really work out too well
The animation of entering/exiting vehicle in BF5 makes it more immersive.
But hindered gameplay
I agree, but it should only stay with BF1 and BFV. It felt authentic there. By original BF game design, it shouldn't be in these modern era ones
@@shaunom8363 I disagree. BF1 was the first BF game that finally added those animations and I thought it would carryover ta latter games. Not sure why it shouldnt be in modern era ones. Very first Battlefield (1942) wasnt modern era and that didnt have vehicle entering animarions. So if they could added it to WW2 era (where BF originated in the first place) I dont see why it shouldnt also be in modern era ones.
@@Marko-ij4vy it’s because people hated it for competitive gameplay
Entering is ok . But not exit
BFV slaps the game in the face in terms of attention to detail
Problem of every "old is gold" folks!
Not completely though they have the same amount of detail tbh and I much prefer the way bullets impact the ground in 2042 and how much more realistic the grenade marks are
@@callmegamer2168 cap
and natural
@@callmegamer2168 granades marks on BFV are more realistic
Love it that people are complaining BFV was such a horrible game, and now suddenly they are praising it when they got their hands on BF2042. LMAO
Predictable, really.
why was it awful? I really enjoyed it ... except the content they gave up on bringing
I dont remember people complaining about bf5s details tho
@@angelot.7935 All BF has awful launches tbh. Like BF4, people seems to forgot how broken this game the 1st year after its launch.
Now after some patches and new contents were added, it became one of the best BF games out there.
Like BFV, it became great after some updates. Played over 400+ hrs on this game and totally enjoyed it.
@@jfygt2623 Unfortunately I can't know what the first year was like having taken it 1 year later ... But it made me very angry that although we improved it, They did nothing to bring new content such as the Soviet Union, Italy, and other axis countries ...
People begin to notice how good BF5 looks.
I played BFV, and I fricking loved it.
Especially the grand operations.
Hell yeah bfv was good af
Went back to it after the 2042 beta, it's way more immersive. In 2042 I feel like just playing to get kills, but in BFV it feels like trying to win a war and not just rake kills.
I never got to experience grand operation. For some reason there's 0 server on Asia
BF 5 looks good minus the trees.
@@aweeeeh5255 check at peak times like 7 - 11 pm. that's when people come home from work and start playing
BFV was not the BF i played the most....but it clearly looks sharper than 2042
Hands down, BFV looks better. The lighting, textures, details, and overall ambience is far better. Comparing the two, BFV has a much more "clear" look to it. Pretty sure BF2042 was dumbed down for cross play which imo, was a massive mistake.
That was not the reason, it was dumbed down because a lot of the frostbite engine devs left Dice because they didn't agree with EA and the game EA wanted them to develop. There were just not enough people that understood how to get the most out of the engine and it clearly shows. EA wanted a battle royale and just copy whatever was popular (apex, fortnite etc), devs didn't like that so they left. EA just doesn't care about the battlefield community, but they don't see that battlefield games have been successful because battlefield stood out, not because it was "just another shooter". battlefield 2042 is a joke and will not be improved to what we hoped it could have been. And from what I can see, we don't need to wait for the next battlefield because they only want to expand on the specialist bullshit and storytelling, the next battlefield will be an even bigger joke, made by people that aren't allowed to think, managed by a company with managers that don't know anything about making games and don't understand that basic marketing tactics don't work if the product sucks.
@@MrSkyl1ne Yep. Since I commented I've seen more stuff surface about development. They result is a combination of inexperience and not enough time. Dice isn't Dice anymore.
Heres a person with the head in the ground. Nextgen consoles holds up with amazing graphics, have a look at the new matrix game.
This situation is created by lazy devs that just want a big cashgrab.
@@OGNovemberSix Did you seriously say I have my head in the ground and then proceed to compare a video game that is hardly multiplayer aside from Co-op compared to bf2042 which is hosting games with 100+ players?
That will easily create a disparity in performance when you start including more players. 2042 still needs better optimization and was rushed but your argument makes no sense.
he has rendered or recorded them in a dumbed down version. The weapons and skins look much better in 2042 than before.
Im not a big fan os BF but i prefer BFV in terms of details.
What a wasted opportunity with BF V.
With the right customizations and not stuff like elite soldiers or batman outfits and golden weapons would have been probably the best ww2 arcade
It's sad they stopped the support early to focus on 2042, and they now have 2 half-baked games. V is amazing right now, and it's missing half it's content...
So you think COD vanguard is much better than BFV?
@@Ellie-qv4pu vanguard is amazing, it may be missing half its content but it has all the same modes we see every year with the new patrol mode which is so innovative along. The game is amazing because it try’s nothing new at all aside from feeling faster paced and the amazing 12 attachments feature put in just to support the guns in warzone!
Moving from BFV to 2042 I am disappointed at first. I live how gunfire, destruction & teamwork of the old game works.
bf5 way more immersive and attention to detail
2042's graphics look very unnatural for some reason I can't put my finger on exactly one specific but it just looks fake like you're playing in a toy town.
I did notice that it's only 50 to 60GB in size so that's not much of an upgrade from the past battlefields bar V
it's as if it's getting harder for devs to upgrade their engines competently.
Yea battlefield 5 4 and 1 have 90% more color n graphics than 2042
2142 got better graphics than this game
@@Almightydubzz Yeah I think colour accuracy does have something to do with the off feeling, it's one of many things though for sure.
I knew I wasn't going crazy. Not sure what it is but I don't like how the game looks and I don't know what it is
It’s a cross platform game, which is unfortunate because it means they have to save frames for last Gen players. It happens and in a game like Battlefield it’s noticeable
To be honest if Battlefield V had cross play and Control support on PC I’d be playing it much more then 2042 for some reason the maps where more memorizing.. and let’s not forget the animation & detail! don’t get me wrong 2042 is & was a great experience it’s completely beautiful but it’s missing a lot. and I’m glad battlefield is back with a Big Bang glad I’ve been playing for years but the maps just don’t give me the enjoyment BFV did.
Battlefield have 4 days online. You need to chill out
@@MiguelXABI14 no its bad, glitches, bugs and the lack of content makes it a unfinished product even more so that you can have better performance playing bf5 on 4k than bf2042 on 1080p.
@@MiguelXABI14 if the game had launched with a decent amount of content it would be "good" but in it's current state is just boring/uncomplete
people complained about bfv having horrible maps and here you are saying the maps were great lol this community is cancer
@@thepizzaelf apart of 2 maps most bf5 maps are great, the community had a content problem not enough maps is not the same as bad maps.
Thats why modern era destruction cannot compete with older era destruction.
Now, buildings are made by strong material that minimise destruction.
Oh that makes more sense now and it's the future
Yep.
Yehhh but it's still a videogame and people want to see shit blow up. It's not like Battlefield adheres to realism in other ways.
@@chrisp2588 It kinda does, and acting like a concrete wall should explode and crumble like it's made out of wood is just silly, it's not an excuse to say that it should be more destructive because it's simply a bf game or just a game in general, there is a balance.
@@raionshishi8290 I'm not saying it should crumble like wood, but concrete also crumbles more satisfyingly in older Battlefield games. There seems to be a lowering in the modularity of the destruction in 2042.
2018 and 2016 were the platinum age of the games we had best games in story , gameplay, graphics and very strong realistic details like
1/Red Dead Redemption 2
2/Battlefield v
3/Batman Arkham Collection
4/The Amazing Spiderman
5/Ratchet And Clank
6/Uncharted 4
7/Titanfall 2
8/God of War
9/Injustice 2
And there are many masterpieces games in different years and strong games like these games but 2018 and 2016 had many masterpieces games but the other years had masterpieces games not as much as 2016 and 2018
You forgot about fortnite hah.
@@iPolaho 😂😂😂yeah you are right 😂idk how people love this baby game i hate it so much
@@Mafia_l. bruhhh lol you are right rdr 2 is dad and bfv is mother and fortnite is their baby
@@Sourish_Editz8769 Yeah bro 😂👍👍
Bf5 had all this detail in craters and destruction because they wanted it to be a more bloody, dirty war like experience. 2042 is more arcade like and sandboxy
The cars blowing up in 2042 look really good. The smoke and the gasoline combusting are really well done!
They are electric cars
@@ottovonbismarck8460 Well, the future in this game is based on the results of global warming, so maybe it's just fuel powered cars that look futuristic (It is the year 2042 in the end). Besides, i'm not sure if electric cars can blow up like that after burning up.
I disagree. When you shoot a bazooka in 2042 the car simply sets of fire first but the car is still intact which is not as realistic as bf5 when the cars is blown to pieces iand shoots all over in the air.
@@webz2k sure, but the burnout that is caused still looks good. Of course, it is weird how it takes so long to explode.
@@ottovonbismarck8460 Oh then the fire ball should be crazier lol
Bf2042 on ps4 looks like a mobile game. What a disgrace! Bf1 in 2016 looks and feels so much better
PS4? I would suppose so with those low specs.
@@minisithunknown5568 yes low specs compared to pc or a ps5. There’s no reason for bf2042 to look worse than BF1 which was released 5 years ago!
BF1 had great immersion, bf5 had less of that and now bf2042 has even less.
BF 1 tem o peso dos bonecos muito realistas, o suporte ele anda lento porq carrega coisas pesadas, o sniper corre mais rapido etc !
O BF V ele é mais realista na parte da munição, de você depender do dos outros te da munição e cura, isso é muito massa.
esse BF novo as texturas principalmente de cosias feito com ferro, parece ser muito mal feitas!
The 128 player count in this game is kind of a marketing gimmick at this point. The maps are so massive that it makes basically no difference to the gameplay at all from 64 players with previous games.
The 64 player count in this game is kind of a marketing gimmick at this point. The maps are so massive that it makes basically no difference to the gameplay at all from 32 players with previous games.
@@SW-uy1kr bro no other BF game has made changes to the map size like 2042 has. You just don’t like that I’m critiquing the game so you’re acting like a child lol not to mention that many players on a server is where this games performance issues are coming from. It’s a stupid trade off, and the only purpose it served was marketing this game.
@ShahOfIran bruh everybody complaining about the bugs and gameplay, you’re talking about maps size and players capacity?? are you dumb?? some people wants bigger warzone, jets feels not awkward too when playing on bigger maps. If you wants to play small caps players and smaller maps then go play cod instead.. it’s literally based from the title “BATTLEFIELD”
@@arrafi204 think about it 64 players with previous games but the maps were smaller, 128 players on bigger maps mean the gameplay dynamic isn’t changed at all for god sake it’s a stupid trade off and was just for marketing to get people hyped about buying the fucking thing.
@@ajuiceboxxx You are just pulling stuff from your behind, firestorm has a massive map and 64 players (though, not anymore, barely any players) and it didn't have any kind of performance problem compared to the usual conquest maps. Don't make up excuse for a poorly made game, with the mediocre graphics of 2042, is should run like butter.
2042 feels so empty and "unreal" compared to V
I have to say that BFV is still my favourite game till these days.
Honestly the fact that they let you personalize the Axis with even buyable skins blow me away at the time (I was coming from COD WW2) and looking at Vanguard now I am really happy that BFV is still alive and appreciated.
2042 is a shame, a mess... it's even less interesting than hardline
Ah ah brother take it easy, I'm sure you don't even have the game
True, I downloaded the game early with ea play and it's literal dogshit
@@dr_emmz But he is right.
@@dr_emmz Playing bf2042 makes me want to play all the previous games again. 2042 can't be called a battlefield game at all
@@dr_emmz I took the EA pro for 15 euros to try it in unlimited for 1 month.
I played 3h and deleted it.
Bf5 is just better in all aspects honestly and thats not saying much. 2042 is such a disappointment
2042 is amazing wdym lol
Then don't play the game
@@nnss2421 sums up almost all COD fans who had no PC. Hatin on a game they did not play.
Tfw BF V looks and plays better while it also has MUCH better performance ( I have already pre ordered BF 2042 tho so no i'm not a blind hater)
Me to, already waiting for my preorder
Lmao you must be blind. BF 2042 is graphically better in every way than BFV
@@mrfoldmyshirt4404 battlefield 2042 definitely has improved lighting effects minus the parts of every map that needed shadows disabled for the sake of optimization
@@mrfoldmyshirt4404 Alright
@@mrfoldmyshirt4404 nah bruh ... Dont talk $hit .... Both looks good ... Bc 2042 is newer dosent mean it looks better 🤡
Wow, you are right. Battlefield 2042 almost looks blurry in comparison. I suppose they sacrificed graphics detail for making unnecessarily large (and incredibly bland) maps.
Fully agree that 2042 just feels like a massive leap backwards. Seems they forgot who their player base is
is BF2042 going backward when it comes to graphics?
You need to take a step back somewhere else, to allow us go forward elsewhere
Thank you for this Video Comparison. I thought that there was something wrong with my TV or Game settings when installed 2042 but nope it's the quality that was produced so sad, returning tomorrow and sticking to 5
Se possível, compara os veículo do 1942 no Portal com os do BFV
También lo quiero.
Ah claro, em todo canto do mundo tem que ter um brasileiro kkkkkkkkk
Speak english, this is an video in english
@@bebedor_de_cafe3272 i don´t me importo about the idioma of the video, I speak the way I quero and whenever I quero
@@bebedor_de_cafe3272 ahora dilo sin llorar
the funny thing is, i can actually see the large technical improvements made on DICE's new version of the Frostbite engine. but there is just absolutely no art design to back it up. i guess thats what happened when it takes a year and a half to change engines instead of just half a year like planned.
I think what was the most entertaining about 2042 was when you shoot a pile of pallets with a gun, it causes all the surrounding stacks of pallets to explode. Gotta love that half ass attention to detail...
Yeah that looked really bad
Does anybody thinks BFV and BF1 looks better then 2042?
why the bf2042's tank color all wahsed out ? is it for realism ? in my eyes bf v tank color is more immersive and better.
imMeRsIvE tANk cOlOr
@@EnormousDuck2 He is damn right you should just use your eyes kiddo
@@Chadowgon5 the material of the current tank does not shine because it is matte; in real life too. You can't compare a shiny tank to one that doesn't pretend to be shiny. Mental
BF5 Visual, Animation, Gunplay >>>>>>>>> BF2042
Battlefield 2042 is what people thought Battlefield V was going to be after the initial trailer.
For me BF2024 is lacking details…
ok but BF5 is a finished product, BF2042 isn't. They said that on the 19th there will be a patch to fix bugs / glich and optimization. Of course they will correct again if needed ...
@@Alessandro-06 wtf kind of excuse is that you pay $60 for a finished fucking game not to wait down the road for it to all be fixed this is why AAA gaming is trash because the communities mindset is like yours.
@@sethhauck1283 What the hell?! I guess you do it on purpose to say the opposite of what I mean...
Obviously you have never played a Battlefield, for example look at the beta of Battlefield 4 and its first months of life, the game was practically unplayable, after they solved all the problems the game was great.
You probably don't get there and think with the brains of Cod players, but I leave you convinced with your nonsense thoughts 🤦♂️
@@Alessandro-06 battlefield 5 still has better graphics when it came out and better gameplay compared to 2042 another cash crab game
@@Almightydubzz ok, then play bf5 again, nobody forbids you
The graphics and the lightning in battlefield 2042 are closer to real life than bf5 . But the attention to details in bf5 are better
I much prefer the lighting in bf 5
It's not that. BF2042 has this horrendous blurry/hazey affect which makes everything look terribly unsharp and clean.
@@djtc2093 You can turn off filters for for that in options, like in every game. Unless your on consoles, companies think console players still like less options.
@@minisithunknown5568 Na man. It's not a filter. It's the game, I am playing with those filters off at ultra 1440p. It's the way they made the game because of the large maps, they don't want to render all the detail.
How the hell does a sedan take an rpg round and not instantly blow up
2042 man, shits made out of kevlar and diamond
With vehicles on fire, BF5 is so much more accurate. Battlefield 2042 is just a fire animation on the vehicle, with metal on fire. But with BF5 it accurately shows the engine and so much more.
Every one was hating bfv , and suddenly it became uncomparable .
Because it brought many great mechanics that's considered one of the best in BF history especially in regards to teamwork, it was redeemed by Pacific update and showing the potential that it can reach once team started pouring more effort into it, last but not least adding authentic cosmetics and adding more weapons/gadgets.
So what's not to love about this masterpiece?! Many of us were hoping that they'd carry over the great changes & enhancements from BF5 to BF2042 but in a modern setting, it would have been perfect.
@@MajdiJarrar Could not have said it better
Probably the bad thing about BF2041 is many of its effects were scripted and not naturally react to the environment, like when you shoot the wood, the entire wood blows up, unlike in BF5 which the wood fence is gonna got damage in specific area where it's being shot. Or when you shoot a window glass, it counts till certain number of shots till it breaks the entire glass in BF2042. The physic in BFV almost seems to be as the same as in RDR2, where environment can react to gun shot using AI (?) that has been coded to the script. So environment can react randomly to whatever action being done to it.
i always supported BFV even during its darkest times, and now its sad to see that BF2042 is nowhere to it.... well gonna play BF1 and BFV and BF4 forever i guess
Yep I dropped £80 on 2042 and I have already gone back to bf5
@@webz2k same BF5 is such a better game
@@ShaunReddick222 no, bf 5 is mid C-tier at best
@@Frosty_V0 but it’s better than 2042 but then again a steaming pile of dog shit served on a plate is better than 2042 so idk.
@@ShaunReddick222 yeah, even vanguard is better than 2042, it’s sad to see how far it’s fallen. It could’ve been great.
I saw a video where they showed the animation of a btf5 character that when colliding with obstacles the character reacted by losing his balance. does anyone have a link to that video?
They really ignored and disgraced everything senior devs had built for over a decade.
I think they had to sacrifice some details and graphics in 2042 in order to make the games peformace somewhat playble and make it run on last gen.
Yet it both looks and runs worse than BF5
@@Megoover it has 128 players and maps are a lot larger.
@@lemmyface2907 is it worth it?
@@lemmyface2907 Last gen is 64 players bro
If any of you guys aren't satisfied with bf2042 and haven't played bfv I highly recommend installing it and giving it a try !
thanks
im re-installing BF5 again now
miss the fun i had there
Bf v Looks way better. Sorry. And I'm not only talking about the destruction
The details feel more subtle in 2042 than bfv which makes them more obvious and micheal bay-esk
you should show the other rifles in 2042 which have much better textures than other games in the series. You can see an example with the M5 recoilless.
BfV honestly looks better than BF2042, but I understand why since there are bigger maps and now there are 128 players in one match. It would have been too difficult to optimize the game if it had better graphics. Besides the graphics still look awesome.
no its just bad optimization even portal maps 64 players is performing like shit.
Optimization with 64 players feels better for me, even though my PC isn't that powerful.
BF5 has been out longer with updates and optimizations. 2042 is just getting started. They can update there maps for more detail if they want.
BFV has alot of stuff wrong with it don't get me wrong, but it atleast felt like a sequel to BF1 and a modern return to form.
2042 on the other hand I chasing trends (even more so then BFV did), and is really more of MW2019 Lite. Yeah portals is neat, just ask yourself how long will it truly last?
Things that 2042 only has:
- fired M44 bullets have a little mark on them
- M44 has the ring of fire thing
- trees react to helicopters
- small and big Vegetation reacts even to small grenades
- Tornado changes color when it goes from sea to land
- Tornado is a different sized in different maps.
- when you fire into the ground mud splashed into your screen
- sprinkles can create raindbows
- Vehicle leaves tire/tread marks into more surfaces than previous games
- shockwaves are visible in big explosions
- soldiers sneeze when AFK
- Soldiers starts to tremble in cold maps
- air resistance in jets (fog)
As someone who played both on PC/Ultra, I think BF 2042 graphics feel crispier. The anti-aliasing method they used on BF5 is worse, even BF1 is better in this regard. And not all maps have the same graphics quality, for example the peak level of BF5 is Rotterdam. It's Manifest for 2042 imo.
Bfv is more of an arcade, they seem to not have found a good relation between an arcade and more realistic
Imagine we have all the texture and effect details from BF5, vehicles and weapons from 2042, color and lighting from BF1 and mechanics and environment from BF4
My wet dream for battlefield
Battlefield 5 feels more like a movie. Battlefield 2042 on the other hand... well...
I don’t get why they made a step back on some good decisions bfV made like the squad scoring thing system and the movement and the attention to detail the series has become known for
I like the animations and effects in bfv it seems like 2042 has less of it tho. But i can understand why people dont want them to me 2042 just seems kinda bland
Something had to be sacrificed to allow us play in these big AOW 128 mayhems that bf2042 has to offer us
Amount of kills that i got by simply shooting roofs with Bazooka in BF5 is quite insane, 2042 took it away.
Also loved making my own paths in BF5 blowing up walls, there is kust no map in 2042 when you can use it in any way.
The funny part is that BFV in terms of FPS is so much better too
BFV graphic details are so much better than 2042, i feel like the 2042 environmental details are so empty...
Destruction in 2042 is a joke compared to BF5. Even in BF3 it looks better. Guns sound and feel like toys in 2042. Overall sound is bad. Graphics are good, but textures look unnatural. Not to mention dozens of good features that are missing. But useless features like ammo resupply zone indicator is there, as if before no one knew they should be near ammo crate to resupply.
Why they removed the crouch sprint?
Reload animation feels stiff on BF2042 and a whole lot other issues, they still have time to fix this.
They don't. And FOR SURE they won't
Why all maps in 2042 looks empty as fuck? Like theres little to no cover for players? Its always like an empty field, so strange
Re downloaded bf5 today after playing 2042 since it’s release cause I felt like going back to some ww2 times and imo it’s far better from the graphics to the gameplay to the immersion the intensity of the battles are wayyyyy better it’s a lot more exhilarating don’t get me wrong 2042 is fun but BF5 is dramatic
Going backwards instead of toward and especially on better hardware
I really hope one day they will back to BFV and start making East line soviet VS german
And then you compare BF5 to BF1 and you realize there was yet another downgrade lol...
I feel like Battlefield lost its indentity. Other studios should do it or something to show EA how it should be done ... too bad Modern Warfare Ground War mode wasnt a bit different
Lmao. Other studios can't unless they want the optimization to be absolutely horrendous for players. The frostbite engine DICE uses simply outclasses everything else.
Ground war? The cod cheapest copy of battlefield's conquest mode?
i see your giggity BF copying MW so called “tac sprint”
I feel like this is a battlefield game.
its upsetting that even with so many graphical improvements, they removed so many immersive details
BF2042 they added more polygons to everything, but skimped on the lighting effects. Lighting is more important.
It's just me or Does anyone else notice that Battlefield looks more and more like COD?
it does, look at the animations , how basic the guns sound... they have lost me, i will not buy another BF game again
Every battlefield game has had a rough launch but if bf4 and bf3 are anything to go by 2042 will smash it !! Its could be really bad , could be stuck playing COD vangard 🤣
SEE YOU ON THE BATTLEFIELD 👍
( just because some people are confused im a battlefield fan boy and saying about vangard was comparing that game to battlefield just for the confused people)
What ?
@@bingolos9063 ? What you confused about mate
This launch isn’t even that bad tho at least it’s playable (I’m on ps5 btw idk about pc and ps4)
@@ibrahimh.1840 its a bit buggy but what battlefield ain't at the start im on the ps5 and had no issues
BFV for BF game was a combination of meh and good, but the animations, prone mechanics, visuals, and the character customization steals the show and I wish they make a comeback in 2042. 2042 is missing alot of cool features alongside the ones I mentioned above: the levolution level of destruction from BF1, BFHL, & BF4 are gone, the behemoth vehicles from BF1 are not there, the classic modes like TDM & Squad TDM are not there, manual leaning aswell.
Portal has all of that, maybe not animations and art styles. But hopefully they add more support for it, Bad Company 2 map has the destruction.
This makes me sad. Like so many others have said. Why are developers going backward in game development? Literally, all they had to do was take bf5 and skin it to 2042 and it would have been a better game. I feel ripped off.
I would never buy that game. I did not like the movement in it or the TTK. Hell I wanted my server listings back.
BFV is a masterpiece
Mjm….the masterpiece that ended the saga BF’s
@@spraizz-7498 Not I really dont understand why everyone hates on it is a great games, yeeeahhh hacker and stuff but cmon he aint killing you everytime
1:30 IRL this can result in the bullet turning into a spinning top.
I knew battlefield 2042 would be a joke I loved battlefield 5 and still do to this day favorite shooter IMO
How its possible tthat I'm getting 120 fps in Bf V and 30 in 2042??? Both games basically have the same graphics...
How is yhe game optmization? I just played the beta, don't know how the actual game is
Still too much stuttering mate
So when battlefield 5 was the main game in the series people shit on it but now that 2042 is out people love it for some reason
May be we were very harsh to BFV. I admit I still enjoy playing BFV a lot.
In my battlefield v tanks don't leave tread marks, anyone know why they don't?
BF V = 110 GB
BF 2042 = 45 GB
Bf v had a single player and lots of content was added later on, I'm sure 2042 will have a larger size with all the new maps and contents
Size doesn’t matter. Quality does
Bf2042 looks so unpolished compared to the previous games
It’s miles ahead of BF4 and BF3 at launch.
It’s below BF1 and BFV (even in BFV had more bugs)
I don’t think so .. generally 2042 is very good and have a lot of content
Y'all people always complain about something
Nah
@@moisessoteldo592 agree
I think crossplay is the reason they turned down details on BF2042 which is a massive step backwards compared to BFV. Sadly this will not change and makes BF2042 look like a BFV on lower settings then settings low in BFV. This was a wrong decision imo.
Why would crossplay hold them back?
CAN EVERYONE STOP CAPPING ABOUT YOUR LOVE FOR BF5? Bro it was a fun game but yall are acting like yall werent pissing shitting and moaning over every little thing with that game. I hate the gaming community bruh just have fun with whatever you have fun playing. Earlier i saw some old head say "sigh guess imma keep playing bf 2 cause there hasnt been a good one since." BET! Do that! I dont care! If anything yall, im glad that battlefield has been consistent at keeping the content fresh. No battlefield is the same as the last. AND THATS OKAY! otherwise itll be the same as cod or ubisoft titles. I commend dice for even trying to switch it up with every title. Anyways whatever bro good vid.
As much as I love Battlefield 5, 2042 just has the atmosphere that I love. The futuristic vibe is something that I have been waiting for in a battlefield game for a very long time. I think people see these videos and make their opinion without even playing the game. Anyone that says "This doesn't feel like a battlefield game" has never played it because holy shit it does
1:00 so you basically just get teleported out the tank???
The efficiency of the workforce prior and during the pandemic. 😅
Never realized BFV was so gorgeous
That’s the difference of details between Old Dice and New Dice
After dropping £80 on 2042 full of hope I have already reverted back to bf5 and cut my losses on this one for now.
The hud in 2042 is really bad and makes the game look even cheaper. Probably the reason why its turned off in this video
Yhe that green color is awful
"128 players" is the big mistake.
We lost a lot....
O problema do BF foi não ter as DLC pagas, igual BF1 que teve premium, não me importe de pagar por DLC !!