+Jack Nicholl ''Prepare for a future battle''. If that's even a legit quote. It wont be scifi but it better be little different than that modern stuff that has been the same since 2005.
+Shaquille Shaw but the difference is that when 2142 was released it was new. it's been a future setting in games for so damn long now that a lot of people are getting tired of it. back when 2142 was released it was refreshing :)
And totally agreed. I mainly see future settings haters, just like me, so if they care about their customers (which they probably don't), they wouldn't make it futuristic..
+MrBasinator this is stupid, on my part i want to see futuristic things "but they don't care about their customers" (wich is true) so they are going to set it in the past you are hating on something you don't even know just making a point
+David Scarbrough I feel like they hinted it will be World War II because look at the picture for Battlefield 1942www.battlefield.com/games/battlefield-1942
Gentlemen, I was merely expressing my hopes for a realistic and more authentic game. Hopefully, Dice steers clear of the future trend. In my opinion, a game set in the past would make a good profit.
+Monkeytacular We'll see attack and defend like we've never seen before, with one side defending a team of construction workers while they build a wall as the opposing team tries to stop them.
Viral Slash It wasnt disappointing. There were 20 Songs in that Album. 5 of which i didnt like but the 15 which i loved. He talks about his achievements, which only TRUE Drake fans will understand because not every song of his is full with bass and rapping fast blah blah. That would desynsitise you to his music or any type of artists' music if you listen to it again and again. Which is why he talks about different subjects and has different melodys
For a second, I was very confused. How could this be a video about the release of Battlefield 5 if this video came out two years ago? But then, I understood.
I think the Battlefield franchise is the only FPS series that I would be able tolerate futuristic settings if done correctly. Battlefield 2142 was a phenomenal game. If they were to go down the futuristic route though, they'd better not milk it, or it'll be just as generic and cringeworthy as every other FPS game.
+Haytham Kenway I feel like the only people that are complaining about the future settings and themes are COD fans. I get it, COD has done futuristic settings forever or that they suck and maybe even oversaturating. But that doesn't mean that BF shouldn't do it because BF hasn't had a futuristic setting since BF 2142 which was 10 years ago. It's also unfair to not want a future BF just because COD has done it, that does not automatically mean that is going to be bad and there are plenty of BF fans that want a future BF since it's been so long for the franchise. I just don't want the direction of BF influenced by COD fans, especially if it's not even there favorite franchise and especially if they just going to drop the new BF and never touch it again as soon as the next COD comes out.
Most people don't seem to realize that BF has ventured into sci-fi before. 2142 was a futuristic game, but infantry movement was boots-on-the-ground. Hopefully they won't be adding jetpacks as a base movement option. It could work as a gadget with either a recharge or limited "ammo".
+ThatDarnSkag It will be bug and lag free after the seventh or eighth patch.. EA will release it when they want to get it out no matter what state its in. Im hoping for a present day or past setting.. I have never been into futuristic shooters but thats just me..
+Rick We need a fucking WW2 battlefield because none of these games can create an AAA big game with big campaign, big maps, levolution and destruction. Its a fact, they dont have that money. Thats why people want WW2 Battlefields. They want games like the old CoD2 but with now tecnology.
+Francisco Garay Exactly, I feel like with the current engines (future at this matter) WWII could be revamped and people will realise that it would actually be pretty cool.
Current war, not previous, current. COD 4 Al asad and Imran Zakhaev, that kinda campaign style. It was brilliant and you got immersed, I for one can remember the mission where halfway through a large rocket takes off, it felt so atmospheric.. I played through the advanced warfare campaign and I can't even remember any of the main characters names ha!
+Xur Agent of the Nine I would LOVE a WW2 shooter; tiger tanks, pershings, messerschmitt planes, and maybe even battleships like USS North Carolina. Think about it, wouldn't that be awesome? Iconic maps like Normandy, Kursk (Great Tank Superiority map) and so on..
+Jake Carlson Yeah, its a joke setup, M16 (which he hates for some reason), holo, (which he dislikes) and M26 MASS (the most sweaty tryhard attachment in the game.....)
+lol yeah seriously, online isn't that good. story was good but online is to please those who buy shark cards and/or modders that havent been caught.. shit's expensive in online.
Chainlink is probably my favourite gamemode on Battlefield 4... Hopefully they don't put it in the next one though... It matches perfectly with Dragon Pass...
I can't wait for this and It doesn't matter if its Battlefield 5, Battlefield Bad Company or perhaps a WW2 era. As long its not a bloody Call Of PUSSY game, im good.
+GoWildLikeHelloKitty Why is everything just likened to CoD? Jesus fuck, they only started the future stuff a few years ago in that series. Battlefield going future does not equal CoD! Heck, Battlefield did future before CoD did...
seems like battlefield has a time line seen with the last stand dlc where we can see vehicles used in 2142 I'm thinking maybe its the wars leading up to it
+Chicka Litta you didnt play 2142 then so stop saying the future is the part that is bad. because its not, its not the gay movement shit that is unrealistic that makes it bad
+Tyler D. Yep. Pretty much. What always makes me laugh is when you have advertisements for games which don't show actual gameplay footage but scenes created with the game engine itself, having detail similar to that of films when they don't in reality. But that's not what really gets to me. What gets to me is the fact that they don't show actual gameplay footage, so you don't really get much of an idea of what the game will be like. I always do a little research about each game before I buy. That way I don't get duked as often. I read the details of gameplay and the reviews both negative and positive and then decide for myself based on the info I've gathered. To be honest though I don't much care about Battlefield anymore. I used to love it, now I just can't play it anymore. I can't play a game where I have a steep learning curve and when the game is updated I have to learn it all over again. It's frustrating. And I also hate being kicked by admins on rented servers for no good reason. If they can't even be bothered to put the rules up how am I supposed to know what they are!? DICE and EA seems to keep up the official hosted servers for about a year and a half or two years down the line and then they take them down, leaving you with crappy rented servers. Half the time I get the impression these admins kick me just because I've killed them a few times in a match. I play like I normally do. I don't spawn camp, I don't use glitches and flaws in the game to win. I win on fair terms. I kinda feel like the game has turned its back on me and I'm just not willing to go through all of it again. If having buggy, unstable launches isn't enough already, then EA and DICE have to use BS tactics like that. Wait to kill a game before all the game breaking stability, bugs and glitches have been ironed out. That's why I have gone elsewhere to sate my FPS appetite. EA and DICE need to get their act sorted if they want to actually compete with other FPS games out there. Oh and nothing against the people who like this game. I respect your preferences. I just don't like the BS I have to put up with this game.
+DBZfan380 You'd be surprised, Battlefield 2142 is one of the best in the series. The far futuristic setting also left room for some really cool game modes. Besides, future could mean anything. Both Battlefield 3 and 4 were set in the "future" from the point of their release, where 3 is set in 2014 and 4 is set in 2020. 5 could be 2025 or something.
I think CoD might have ruined your idea of a futuristic fps. The wall running etc isn't for everyone and definitely not me. BF2143 if done correctly would be glorious.
+Shivam Vashisht STFU! There are too much Futuristic shit! BF2143 was also shit! I want to play an Modern Combat Game like: NATO, RUSSIA and CHINA fighting against IS, or an WWII Game...
This video showed up in my recommended lol, the funny thing is the actual battlefield V is being announced in less than a week so i thought it was a current video until i started watching and realized it was from the time prior to the battlefield 1 announcement. Can't believe it's been 2 years already
im really really hoping for a better rush mode as well , those were the games that made your heart stand still when the bomb is defused 1 second before it detonates
+AkaZeo God I hated it when dice nerfed Rush all around in BF4. Shit amount of tickets, only infy game play. It's like, what the fuck is this, give me my scout copters and stuff back
Please don't be Advanced Warfare, Please don't be Advanced Warfare, Please don't be Advanced Warfare! It's been a while since we stormed battle-scarred europe, and I'd love to go back to bolt action iron sights, but I'm fine with it being Bad Company or present day BF5 again. Anything but but fucking Advanced-bullshit-lasergun-jumparound-jetpack-shitygadget-Warfare.
+Rawr Bawr I agree that WW2 would be freaking amazing!! Imagine Omaha Beach or El Alamein with Frostbite, legendary!! Though with the whole Future = COD stuff, i say this. 2142.
+jibcano no lol, ww1 was boring, and how is it more team based when the main objective would to be to seamlessly run at the enemy trench, which 90% of the time led to failure. WW1 was a very boring war and look at Verdun for example, its fun for a bit with the historical accurateness but at the end of the day its the same old defending and attempting to take trenches.
I really would like to see the Vietnam war in the next battlefield. Im tired of the modern military setting and I think that it is a great middle point for the people that want WW2 and the people that want a more modern battlefield. They cant go wrong with the Vietnam setting because it covers both groups of people.
Yeah i agree Vietnam is a good setting but why i think they might stay modern is that they really know what they're doing with it so it'll turn out really well, i really could care less as long as they put effort in the game, if you look at planetside 2 they have a great jetpack system and no one seems to complain
THIZZED Im Canadian. I have no relatives that served in Vietnam and it is the best possible setting to please the Modern crowd and the WW2 crowd. The futurist crowd can fuck off!
+bloodravenist I could settle for either one and we know BF could easily do either on updated Frostbite. Although I have contemplated if Dice were to do 2143 and I could be all for that. Either way, it will be a vastly superior title to COD: Supply Drops.
+henehan1 No, trumps gonna challenge Mexico to the biggest game of Jenga ever, have them set up the board. And then when they're finished, trumps just gonna say, "I don't want to play anymore"
+Itai Pendler dude JohnnyEthco is appsro real name n his own channel.... I have been following these guys since before they had even 70k subscribers i think
+Josh Berroth I prefer this Battlefield Formula he one I've been playing for years. BUT I wouldn't be made if BC3 came out just for the people who like the BC run.
I'd be perfectly fine with another modern military still battlefield. I feel like the ww2 one would be too risking for bf to come back onto the market after 3 years.
+Ronny Mendez things such as Uniforms, Camo's, Attachments are all part of Customization, how many Camo's and Uniforms do you think there are in WW2 and not to mention the vehicle skins!
+KFCinMAHBUTT wrong with the weapons too. Their were a bunch of variations of weapons and even a few prototype weapons so their would be more then enough weapons for a ww2 tileset.
Aku-12 Stubby Grip Medium Range-Aku-12 x 2 Hunter Camo Secondary:M-9 No attachments Camo of your choice Gadget 1:Smaw Gadget 2: Repair Tool Hey LevelCap I've been watching your videos for a while and just now subscribed.Keep the vids coming!
I'd love if Bf5 became WW2 because I'd really love to storm Normandy in with Battlefield 4 graphics, or fight in a quite urbanized environment just like Stalingrad with the Frosbite engine. Or at least they should work on Bad Company 3!
as long as the game is grounded, aka no jetpacks or wall running or shit. i rather it be set in the past or maybe a battlefield 2143 that would be nice. but if its set in the past im fine, dont care which war either, give me bolt action guns at a war zone i've been taught about (did history so thats alot) like the dday from bf 1942 that would be nice. i just want battlefield do something completely different to the new cod, but if they want to follow cod and remaster the bad company games, im DEFIANTLY not going to complain about that
look up battlefield 5 on google scroll down until you see the "game" without clicking anything and the release date says 4.2/5 the 4.2 meaning 1942 and the 5 meaning battlefield 5
+TNT Gaming Jack Frags told me personally that the next Battlefield wont be futuristic. IM NOT LYING. I talked to him on PSN. I was playing Bf4 and I noticed a guy running around with a Dice LA camo and I thought " Holy shit how did that guy get that?" So i sent him a message. He said that he was jack frags. I replied and said " But Jack would never play battlefield on Ps4." He responded and said that he was at a mates. So I asked him "will the next battlefield be futuristic?" He said this. Im reading this straight from my Ps4 messages. " I cant tell you much but it isn't going to be futuristic :). SO there you go im serious I actually talked to him. The dice LA camo gave him away.
+Yuki Terumi I completely agree with you, we are a dying and rare breed my friend, no one cares about Bad Company anymore, they have all forgotten about Haggs, Sweetwater and Sarge, we will remember them, we will be the ones to carry on their memory. Ive been waiting for years for Bad Company 3, but our chances are looking not too bright my friend :(
+sAy wHAAt? Sure, if you enjoy playing the same shooter games over and over that are over 10 years old. I can't think of a single triple A game in the past few years that wasn't modern or futuristic. The last 4 Battlefield games were modern.
the day that EA comes out with the trailer and game reveal is the same day as VE day which stands for Victory in Europe. Possibly hinting that it would take place around 1944 and 1945 in the European/Atlantic theater of WW2.
+Just a Moose totally agree that's what I've always loved about Battlefield games it's enjoyable and demands teamwork and especially the longevity of each match.
What is up with all the future hate in the comments? Until now I was under the impression that 2142 had a pretty good reputation and 2143 was something usually awaited with good hopes.
BFassassinwithswag yeah but all the ww2 is completely outdated. I never said I wanted ww2, just anything but future. In fact alternate history, but still in a similar timeline, would be most interesting to me
+Michael J. Cabose I think a lot of people assume bf4 is "meh" because it was broken at launch, now I think it's just below bf3 in how much I like it because now it's a solid game. Hardline sucks #ftw
It would be cool if they added 10 different time zones and weather for multiplayer maps. So for example, you could play siege of Shanghai in the middle of the night while it's raining and the next time you play it could be at dawn with clear skies.
Oh god almighty please no more hardline bullshit, no more futuristic crap, and please for the love of god no broken Multiplayer at launch. I hope they don't fuck it up like cod did.
DaBuzzkeel They literally said it their self. But what can you expect out of a Clinton supporter? And one that questions things... bit hypocritical if you ask me.
fingers crossed it isn't some future bullshit
+Jack Nicholl Battlefield - Advanced warfare
+Jack Nicholl yyyep
+Daniel battlefield infinity warfare XDDD
i will fist fight ea if it is haha
+Jack Nicholl ''Prepare for a future battle''. If that's even a legit quote. It wont be scifi but it better be little different than that modern stuff that has been the same since 2005.
am i the only one that's nervous?
I really REALLY hope they didn't fuck it up with future shit
2142 was more futuristic then any cod game and that was damn near a decade ago...
+Shaquille Shaw and it was great
+Kid Desu every game is going that way and it's getting boring
It won't necessarily be bad if it's a futuristic game but it would be kind of a shame since everyone is doing that right now.
+Shaquille Shaw but the difference is that when 2142 was released it was new. it's been a future setting in games for so damn long now that a lot of people are getting tired of it. back when 2142 was released it was refreshing :)
Lol the actual battlefield 5 is in 2018 😂 and this 2 year old vid comes in my recommended
New-Being tube SAME
Lol, ikr.
I was happy for a moment after I saw the thumbnail 🤣🤣🤣
Revealed in May, Released in November, Won't work until March.
most likely
+Ron Laudadio You're optimistic about March hahahaha
lmfao
+Ron Laudadio still better than cod
+Der_Jaeger Damn straight. BF4 still doesn't run well on my PC.
Do you know what would be hilariously disappointing?
Battlefield: Hardline 2
don't even fucking say it
LMAO...fuck no XD
I hope I didn't jinx it
please man don't even put that scenario in my head, that's just fucked up
hard line was a shitty money maker anyways
took me 3 minutes to realise that this video wasn't about Battlefield V and that its 2 years old...
KrillGaming lmao I know mate, I thought it was Battlefield V too
Set it in the future so i can save $60
Man don't fucking talk to me I'm here to train even better
Haha nice one
And totally agreed. I mainly see future settings haters, just like me, so if they care about their customers (which they probably don't), they wouldn't make it futuristic..
MrBasinator its upto them set it in the past or present day and alot of people will buy set it in the future and il happily save my money
+MrBasinator this is stupid, on my part i want to see futuristic things "but they don't care about their customers" (wich is true) so they are going to set it in the past
you are hating on something you don't even know just making a point
If its WW1, 2 or narm BF5 has already won 2016
+Invective I'm hoping for nam.
If it's Bad Company 3, they won the decade.
Nam or future for me
What is NAM?
Why do so many people want a ww2 setting?
Imagine Battlefield 5 Afghanistan or Battlefield 5 Vietnam.
That would be lit
+David Scarbrough I feel like they hinted it will be World War II because look at the picture for Battlefield 1942www.battlefield.com/games/battlefield-1942
+Bacon_Sentry Yeah all the leaks take place around that era.
+Bacon_Sentry I hope not
David Scarbrough When you say Afghanistan is Soviets in Afghanistan?
I swear to god if it's in the future imma be pissed. Well if this goes futuristic then I'm all out of modern triple A shooters.
it says prepare for the future
+K Mag it will play after the final stand dlc and i whould even bet on it.
+pony_destroyer xboxwon It does but is it an official image?
I guarantee it will be
+K Mag *Unless* Battlefield 2142 returns
Please revisit the old days. No future bullshit
+Blackplague783 hes stating what he's thinking. don't take it so literal
Gentlemen, I was merely expressing my hopes for a realistic and more authentic game. Hopefully, Dice steers clear of the future trend. In my opinion, a game set in the past would make a good profit.
+The Lil Wolf battlefield : napoleonic war ??
+The Lil Wolf really the only think I would hate is modern since it has been done already
+The Lil Wolf look if it's futuristic I'm okay as long as people are not exo jumping it will be fine
Battlefield Trump: Border Patrol
+Monkeytacular I'M FUCKING WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAK
W
+Monkeytacular A Small Loan of a Million Dollars Shortcut Kit along with Make America Great Again DLC if you preorder it now.
+Monkeytacular We'll see attack and defend like we've never seen before, with one side defending a team of construction workers while they build a wall as the opposing team tries to stop them.
lmaoo
holy shitballs, cant wait to see this
Same
Woah you guys have the same pic
+SY Hapless lol
+brayden goodack Hahah yeah.
Haha Best Comment of today!
VIEWS FROM THE 6, BATTLEFIELD 5 OCTOBER'S VERY OWN DRAKE WARFARE CONFORMED
Confirmed
lol I love every word in that sentence
mw1 on ps4
views was disappointing
Viral Slash It wasnt disappointing. There were 20 Songs in that Album. 5 of which i didnt like but the 15 which i loved. He talks about his achievements, which only TRUE Drake fans will understand because not every song of his is full with bass and rapping fast blah blah. That would desynsitise you to his music or any type of artists' music if you listen to it again and again. Which is why he talks about different subjects and has different melodys
For a second, I was very confused. How could this be a video about the release of Battlefield 5 if this video came out two years ago?
But then, I understood.
Dylan Rosen lmao yeah me too
please tell me it's not future setting
why not?
+matheusgc02 BF4 and other games cause the cod franchise is going futuristic and its going to shit
+matheusgc02 BF4 and other games because there is like other 7272663001666390171668377167828387 games like it
I think the Battlefield franchise is the only FPS series that I would be able tolerate futuristic settings if done correctly. Battlefield 2142 was a phenomenal game. If they were to go down the futuristic route though, they'd better not milk it, or it'll be just as generic and cringeworthy as every other FPS game.
+Haytham Kenway I feel like the only people that are complaining about the future settings and themes are COD fans. I get it, COD has done futuristic settings forever or that they suck and maybe even oversaturating. But that doesn't mean that BF shouldn't do it because BF hasn't had a futuristic setting since BF 2142 which was 10 years ago. It's also unfair to not want a future BF just because COD has done it, that does not automatically mean that is going to be bad and there are plenty of BF fans that want a future BF since it's been so long for the franchise.
I just don't want the direction of BF influenced by COD fans, especially if it's not even there favorite franchise and especially if they just going to drop the new BF and never touch it again as soon as the next COD comes out.
Battlefield Primal
Caves from the west Vs. Caves from the east!
Yeah!
Derp
+Crylhound Nobody would be able to complain about too man guns.
+Crylhound ehhhh bows and arrows? Na
The phantom bow... it was a sign... I knew all along
+sithan prak bows, arrows, bludgeons, spears, mammoths, sabertooths. Conquest is all about capturing that precious fire place.
Kappa
+erikmeteenk just imagine. The phant bow was really a sign to a prehistoric age with sticks and stones. Grenades as pidgeons and parrots
It’s funny how I got this on my recommended list 1 week before BF5 2K18
Battlefield 1944, please. Or Battlefield 1951.
EDIT: By 1951, I mean the *Korean* War
+InSanic 1951 would be pretty neat
+InSanic What happened in 1951?
+spartanB0292 Vitenam... i think.
+spartanB0292 cold war?
+spartanB0292 kino Der doten
Most people don't seem to realize that BF has ventured into sci-fi before. 2142 was a futuristic game, but infantry movement was boots-on-the-ground. Hopefully they won't be adding jetpacks as a base movement option. It could work as a gadget with either a recharge or limited "ammo".
Also, as long as it's a bug- and lag-free game with balanced weapons and fun gameplay, I don't care about the time period.
+ThatDarnSkag It will be bug and lag free after the seventh or eighth patch.. EA will release it when they want to get it out no matter what state its in.
Im hoping for a present day or past setting.. I have never been into futuristic shooters but thats just me..
battlefield 2018: hardline the overpriced dlc with its own dlc 2
+Omituinen Otus same I enjoy battlefield because it is in present day
Please don't be futuristic.. Please don't be futuristic..
I'd like to see a WWII battlefield again.
+WeightySpoon™ what's wrong with futuristic...
+Rick We need a fucking WW2 battlefield because none of these games can create an AAA big game with big campaign, big maps, levolution and destruction. Its a fact, they dont have that money. Thats why people want WW2 Battlefields. They want games like the old CoD2 but with now tecnology.
+Francisco Garay Exactly, I feel like with the current engines (future at this matter) WWII could be revamped and people will realise that it would actually be pretty cool.
Current war, not previous, current. COD 4 Al asad and Imran Zakhaev, that kinda campaign style. It was brilliant and you got immersed, I for one can remember the mission where halfway through a large rocket takes off, it felt so atmospheric.. I played through the advanced warfare campaign and I can't even remember any of the main characters names ha!
I really hope it's WW2.....
+Drayexe I wouldn't get your hopes up but by golly just imagine if it is
same, and not hoping to see a future battlefield
Probably not cause they kept on saying the word future
+Utku Akbas why? 2142 was great I'd love a sequel to that.
+Xur Agent of the Nine I would LOVE a WW2 shooter; tiger tanks, pershings, messerschmitt planes, and maybe even battleships like USS North Carolina. Think about it, wouldn't that be awesome? Iconic maps like Normandy, Kursk (Great Tank Superiority map) and so on..
Did anyone else notice he's using the 2x magnifier even though he said it's a useless attachment
That was from a loadout video
Old footage. Also I too use useless stuff sometimes. Know why? Because it's a fucking videogame and I like to switch it up once in a fucking while.
Who cares....
+Jake Carlson Yeah, its a joke setup, M16 (which he hates for some reason), holo, (which he dislikes) and M26 MASS (the most sweaty tryhard attachment in the game.....)
if it's during ww2 and it has the sw battlefront's graphics, I throw cod bo3 and gta5 in the trash
+Feno Rossi bo3 should already be there.
i understand bo3 in bin but gta5 seriously?
+lol yeah,ur right...
same tbh if its ww1 even more
+lol yeah seriously, online isn't that good. story was good but online is to please those who buy shark cards and/or modders that havent been caught.. shit's expensive in online.
i want DAMAVAND PEAK. AND RUSH, NOT FUCKING CHAINLINK
I really hope they'll bring back damavad peak
+PussyPounder69 best bf rush map
Chainlink is probably my favourite gamemode on Battlefield 4... Hopefully they don't put it in the next one though... It matches perfectly with Dragon Pass...
They NEED TO KEEP LEVOLUTIONS PLZZZZZ
battle field without levolution is like 360 no scope in cod
I swear if it's based in the future, it's gunna be Advanced Warfare
+Kevin Su (Kev) jumps suits , laser guns with no reload , supply drops , sounds like cod right but no this is becoming battle field
Just because cod fucked it up doesn't mean a futuristic game can't be done correctly
+maxrun 93 Please please please be BC3!
+Brandon Hand I liked advanced warfare
+Juba Mik good for you
I can't wait for this and It doesn't matter if its Battlefield 5, Battlefield Bad Company or perhaps a WW2 era. As long its not a bloody Call Of PUSSY game, im good.
I mean I wouldn't really mind a call for some pussy but call of shit I don't want
+VigilantAssassin Great joke m8, I r8 8/8 no h8. Appreci8?
+Christopher Grayson bars.
+X 13 2Legit2Quit.
oh god it's set in the future. plz no jump packs
+GoWildLikeHelloKitty true set in the future but still realistic would be nice
+GoWildLikeHelloKitty Why is everything just likened to CoD? Jesus fuck, they only started the future stuff a few years ago in that series. Battlefield going future does not equal CoD! Heck, Battlefield did future before CoD did...
seems like battlefield has a time line seen with the last stand dlc where we can see vehicles used in 2142 I'm thinking maybe its the wars leading up to it
+abel alfaro you mean 2143 lol
+Chicka Litta you didnt play 2142 then so stop saying the future is the part that is bad. because its not, its not the gay movement shit that is unrealistic that makes it bad
I hope they finish it BEFORE they release it.
***** Yeah that's EA. I haven't bought any of their games since bf4. They would need to produce a masterpiece for me to support their products again.
+SirGooglinMort Smith Blame EA
+Tyler D. Yeah, I thought that game would be stellar...got bored in 2 days.
someone called me -EA
+Tyler D. Yep. Pretty much. What always makes me laugh is when you have advertisements for games which don't show actual gameplay footage but scenes created with the game engine itself, having detail similar to that of films when they don't in reality. But that's not what really gets to me. What gets to me is the fact that they don't show actual gameplay footage, so you don't really get much of an idea of what the game will be like. I always do a little research about each game before I buy. That way I don't get duked as often. I read the details of gameplay and the reviews both negative and positive and then decide for myself based on the info I've gathered.
To be honest though I don't much care about Battlefield anymore. I used to love it, now I just can't play it anymore. I can't play a game where I have a steep learning curve and when the game is updated I have to learn it all over again. It's frustrating. And I also hate being kicked by admins on rented servers for no good reason. If they can't even be bothered to put the rules up how am I supposed to know what they are!? DICE and EA seems to keep up the official hosted servers for about a year and a half or two years down the line and then they take them down, leaving you with crappy rented servers. Half the time I get the impression these admins kick me just because I've killed them a few times in a match. I play like I normally do. I don't spawn camp, I don't use glitches and flaws in the game to win. I win on fair terms. I kinda feel like the game has turned its back on me and I'm just not willing to go through all of it again. If having buggy, unstable launches isn't enough already, then EA and DICE have to use BS tactics like that. Wait to kill a game before all the game breaking stability, bugs and glitches have been ironed out. That's why I have gone elsewhere to sate my FPS appetite. EA and DICE need to get their act sorted if they want to actually compete with other FPS games out there.
Oh and nothing against the people who like this game. I respect your preferences. I just don't like the BS I have to put up with this game.
Who's ready for the next big release! Battlefield: Primal! Take your bow or club and go kill the east tribe!
lol gg
that would be cool XD
East tribe 😂😂
All the tribes were at peace, until the East Tribe was attacked.
No THiS Is NOT PUDDiNG!! :D The powerful western tribe enjoys picking on its little cousin tribes from the south and north
a "future battle"? I hope they don't mean it's gonna be futuristic, battlefield will be shit if they do that.
no it wont
remember 2142?
+DBZfan380 You'd be surprised, Battlefield 2142 is one of the best in the series. The far futuristic setting also left room for some really cool game modes. Besides, future could mean anything. Both Battlefield 3 and 4 were set in the "future" from the point of their release, where 3 is set in 2014 and 4 is set in 2020. 5 could be 2025 or something.
I think CoD might have ruined your idea of a futuristic fps. The wall running etc isn't for everyone and definitely not me. BF2143 if done correctly would be glorious.
+Cyrmes totally agree! titan mode resulted in some epic battles!
+Shivam Vashisht STFU! There are too much Futuristic shit! BF2143 was also shit! I want to play an Modern Combat Game like: NATO, RUSSIA and CHINA fighting against IS, or an WWII Game...
Am i the only one who wouldn't mind a present day setting. Everyone is going for a WW2 setting.
I want it to be like bf3/4 aswell
+Hector the lll sams
Well pretty sure the games setting is set in stone now so our opinions dont matter too much bud
+iamjigaboojuan wow, you've made so many valid points as to why a modern setting would be better
+Sager Singh I would like the campaign to focus around Afghanistan and Iraq
This video showed up in my recommended lol, the funny thing is the actual battlefield V is being announced in less than a week so i thought it was a current video until i started watching and realized it was from the time prior to the battlefield 1 announcement. Can't believe it's been 2 years already
Ethan K. Lol
im really really hoping for a better rush mode as well , those were the games that made your heart stand still when the bomb is defused 1 second before it detonates
+AkaZeo God I hated it when dice nerfed Rush all around in BF4. Shit amount of tickets, only infy game play. It's like, what the fuck is this, give me my scout copters and stuff back
yeah bad company 3 would be awesome , you can not do a bad company without rush :P
Please don't be Advanced Warfare, Please don't be Advanced Warfare, Please don't be Advanced Warfare!
It's been a while since we stormed battle-scarred europe, and I'd love to go back to bolt action iron sights, but I'm fine with it being Bad Company or present day BF5 again. Anything but but fucking Advanced-bullshit-lasergun-jumparound-jetpack-shitygadget-Warfare.
+Rawr Bawr Why the hell do people think that future= jetpacks and wallrunning.
+NAMESII Right
+Rawr Bawr I agree that WW2 would be freaking amazing!! Imagine Omaha Beach or El Alamein with Frostbite, legendary!! Though with the whole Future = COD stuff, i say this. 2142.
+Shaquille Shaw Tell him again 😂
+NAMESII because every other game does it
only people that know almost 0 about WW1 want WW1 battlefield
^^
+Guilherme Velhote Seems to be the opposite that I've noticed. It would be a very team based game which is what battlefield is good at.
+jibcano no lol, ww1 was boring, and how is it more team based when the main objective would to be to seamlessly run at the enemy trench, which 90% of the time led to failure. WW1 was a very boring war and look at Verdun for example, its fun for a bit with the historical accurateness but at the end of the day its the same old defending and attempting to take trenches.
+Guilherme Velhote yeah i cant imagine it being easy to make lots of content for a ww1 game
jibcano
don´t forget it can´t be a copy of verdum
I really would like to see the Vietnam war in the next battlefield. Im tired of the modern military setting and I think that it is a great middle point for the people that want WW2 and the people that want a more modern battlefield. They cant go wrong with the Vietnam setting because it covers both groups of people.
Yeah i agree Vietnam is a good setting but why i think they might stay modern is that they really know what they're doing with it so it'll turn out really well, i really could care less as long as they put effort in the game, if you look at planetside 2 they have a great jetpack system and no one seems to complain
+Alex Page
Best of both worlds, modern with a Vietnam expansion pack like in bad company
Only U.S. players would want veitnam
THIZZED Im Canadian. I have no relatives that served in Vietnam and it is the best possible setting to please the Modern crowd and the WW2 crowd. The futurist crowd can fuck off!
+THIZZED Vietnam*
if its gonna be a future game we need to boycott IT
not me.
I want modern on past
Clearly you've never played 2142.
+Mark McCutcheon My thoughts exactly.
+Diego Arredondo or past I meant
It’s awkward when it’s 2 years later the next game is called battlefield 5 and it’s less than 1 week away
WW1 !!!! WW1!!!!!! i hope i want bolt actions, trench warfare, crapy tanks, questionable airplanes.
ill also settle for battlefield 2143
YES! WW1 I'd love it.
+bloodravenist 2143>
+bloodravenist I could settle for either one and we know BF could easily do either on updated Frostbite. Although I have contemplated if Dice were to do 2143 and I could be all for that. Either way, it will be a vastly superior title to COD: Supply Drops.
There's already a ww1 game on steam
I would prefer ww2 because there was a lot more guns, planes, tanks and a lot more happened during ww2
Battlefield 5: Trump's War, Nuke ISIS?
Build-A-Wall simulator
Mexico pays
+henehan1 You fucking thought . Mexico said already that we ain't paying for shit so fuck off
+henehan1 No, trumps gonna challenge Mexico to the biggest game of Jenga ever, have them set up the board. And then when they're finished, trumps just gonna say, "I don't want to play anymore"
+Shark24 You guys are just everywhere eh?
Who is against Trump?
Has anyone notice that Squad Rush is missing in BF4? It was one of the top 3 popular game modes in the BF franchise
See ya there! :D
OMG r u guys going to live stream O_O.... How many of you guys r going???? Please answer please
what!!!! bffs are gonna b there. there better be a video about it on neebs gaming. also did u guys get to do voice work for this one?
+Itai Pendler he is one of them -... One of the bffs -... Battlegasam
Damn it appsro y dont u people have a similar video 😢
+Itai Pendler dude JohnnyEthco is appsro real name n his own channel.... I have been following these guys since before they had even 70k subscribers i think
Really youtube got notification in 2017 what are you doing
Am i the only one that REALLY wants bad company 3? That would be awesome!
You are definitely not! :D
+Josh Berroth I prefer this Battlefield Formula he one I've been playing for years. BUT I wouldn't be made if BC3 came out just for the people who like the BC run.
+Josh Berroth miss the really big maps in BF:BC2
+Josh Berroth obviously not
I miss bad company
At least its not gonna be Hardline 2. THANK FUCKING GOD
I hope they keep some of the features that hardline added like the gun bench, if maybe changed slightly.
+AceDaMace agreed i like the money system to instead of the xp system in BF4 (but some guns have to stay that way might be better)
Dang I thought there was another one coming but it's eight months old it was in my recommended. smh TH-cam.
its going to be the Flintstones go to war with dinosaurs and when you get a kill your avatar will say yaba daba do.
why are games at the moment set at the future, what will future games be set at??????
+ThePolulos Future future
+ThePolulos MAKE ANOTHER WORLD WAR II GAME
+ThePolulos space future
+born2war1 that's what cod is doing.
TK Sysavattsysavat mabye go back to modern or world war
I just hope it stays modern day. I hope to see more factions added to multiplayer along with the US, RU, CN. I am hoping for the UK.
+luger700 modern day enough.. we have like way way way too much modern/futuristic games. ww2 more like it.
US
Russian Federation
China
EU
UK
Brazil
Argentina
India
+luger700 US RU, CN, + ALB GER pretty much all belkan countries i mean they started all world wars lol
+MrDarragh123456789 don't forget about au (Australia)
+MrDarragh123456789 Brazil and Argentina? hahah
If its futuristic im gonna be so pissed off
+marine12324 people be hatin
Battlefield in the future would be good not like cod. Battlefield can pull it off
+The Mansejj theyve done future battlefields before, 2142....
+CONSTIPATED OVERLORD the last dlc in bf4 kinda alluded to those games. (The tanks and mechs)
I'd be perfectly fine with another modern military still battlefield. I feel like the ww2 one would be too risking for bf to come back onto the market after 3 years.
no
In my opinion, if u do it in ww2 there wont be that much customization or maps
Many maps and a standard amount of customization
+Ronny Mendez things such as Uniforms, Camo's, Attachments are all part of Customization, how many Camo's and Uniforms do you think there are in WW2 and not to mention the vehicle skins!
+KFCinMAHBUTT wrong with the weapons too. Their were a bunch of variations of weapons and even a few prototype weapons so their would be more then enough weapons for a ww2 tileset.
Aku-12
Stubby Grip
Medium Range-Aku-12 x 2
Hunter Camo
Secondary:M-9
No attachments
Camo of your choice
Gadget 1:Smaw
Gadget 2: Repair Tool
Hey LevelCap I've been watching your videos for a while and just now subscribed.Keep the vids coming!
Make it Battlefield WW3 please !!! Many nations! Damn I need it!
Y did I get a notification for this
John Johnston I just got one too and watched it and was pretty confused
I just did, and I thought that it was actually BF5. I thought "damn, already?" but then I checked the date.
Josh C same :(
Josh C so much clickbait
Same as me, so confused
I'm seeing a lot comments saying what it would be like for the setting to be in the past and future, but no one mentions the present.
If BF5 is set in a past conflict or alternative past history conflict, I'm afraid my Destiny, CoD, and Fallout days are quite numbered...
I'd love if Bf5 became WW2 because I'd really love to storm Normandy in with Battlefield 4 graphics, or fight in a quite urbanized environment just like Stalingrad with the Frosbite engine. Or at least they should work on Bad Company 3!
Same and on a side note the graphics will be better that Battlefield 4! :)
Louis Tompkin yup!
Sean Rourke hmm then we should expect not urban fighting or many vehicles/weapons
Onyx Dragon actually there are tons, including SMG's and trench shotguns. Close quarters is very likely as well as long range
Nice can't wait it's 2021 and no battlefield I acknowledge has been released since bf4
I don't give a fuck about battlefield 5. I just want Badcompany 3 and then I can finally lay to rest.
1944 would be cool western front, eastern front, africa, italy
This video was released exactly 2 years ago... means we are so close to the Battlefield 2018 reveal apparently.
Is it going to be like Battlefield 2142?
We don't know yet
We'll find out may 6th
+Zelousmarineinspace | it's pre-2142, because old 2142 was included bipedal vehicular warfare that is already taken by TITANFALL 2...
2142 no way thats gonna happen we already going to have infinite warfare
Battlefield 5!!!!
Oh, battlefield 1
Majorivan7 lmao
Holy shit I thought this was for the 2018 battlefield 5. Well people from the past, its WW1.....
Spegy’s Snail me to😂😂😂
Hopfully we get a cold war setting
I wouldn't mind that actually.
***** Cold war bro.....
Vietnam, Sowjet Union, GDR.....
+Nicholas Perez He's trying to tell you that there was no fighting in the Cold War "bro". lol
+ImmortalPhoenix The Korean War could be considered fighting considering we fought against the Russian soldiers/North Koreans/Chinese
what is the big fuss about it, it's either set in future, or past or atlest in present. either of the 3. for sure.
+iceberg789 lol no other choices
+Evan R Garcia btw hardline is not battlefield so I don't even think about that monstrosity
What if it is a different universe and it takes place on a different planet
Iatesk8
there is already that, it's called battlefront.
iceberg789 yea but the new one is an embarrassment to the first and second one. Also I meant like a new universe not one already created
I'm watching this two years after the video was posted, and bf5 hasn't come out yet.
I'm fucking preying for world war 1, nam or world war 2
I Agree!!!
I want innovative gaming I could careless about world war anything...we've already had war games
+Aaron Edwards **Couldn't
Preying? Jeez you gotta kill over this? ;)
+Vape Nation same
Inb4 nvidia pascal revealed at battlefield event.
Past May 6th, no reveals trailer. LevelCap???!!!!
Joe M this video was 2 years ago bro.. he was talking about battlefield 1 in this video
Lmaoooo
Dammit. Im watching this in 2017 and I thought this was the BF after BF1
Fintan Cook lol same
What time is the stream? GMT time please
22:00 GMT
+ZekeMagnum Well, It won't be GMT as it's now BST. But it will be 6:00pm
+sandro sorrentino No it's 9pm BST... 10pm GMT
Yes, but in the UK were on BST (British Summer Time now) not GMT.
9pm GMT I believe
im here trying to find the livestream date for the new one and it took me a minute to realise this is the wrong one
Battlefield 5: Muslim Invasion
at least we can agree on something ;)
Battlefield 5: cyka blyat
Better than 2142
+Николай Сеченова yes we will invade you
+Youcef Mahdadi jajajajjajaja
as long as the game is grounded, aka no jetpacks or wall running or shit. i rather it be set in the past or maybe a battlefield 2143 that would be nice. but if its set in the past im fine, dont care which war either, give me bolt action guns at a war zone i've been taught about (did history so thats alot) like the dday from bf 1942 that would be nice. i just want battlefield do something completely different to the new cod, but if they want to follow cod and remaster the bad company games, im DEFIANTLY not going to complain about that
also can someone tell me what twitch channel or whatever this livestream will be on?
+Blitz i'm sure if you just go to twitch on the 6th it will be on the front page
+Blitz www.battlefield.com/event
Pozhinat thanks
Stop saying battlefield Is like cod
look up battlefield 5 on google scroll down until you see the "game" without clicking anything and the release date says 4.2/5 the 4.2 meaning 1942 and the 5 meaning battlefield 5
where can I watch this live stream? ?
+CityRatGames Gamespot
Dice Knows that the Gamers dont want futuristic settings They are clever they are probably not going to make the same mistake as call of duty made
+TNT Gaming Jack Frags told me personally that the next Battlefield wont be futuristic. IM NOT LYING. I talked to him on PSN. I was playing Bf4 and I noticed a guy running around with a Dice LA camo and I thought " Holy shit how did that guy get that?" So i sent him a message. He said that he was jack frags. I replied and said " But Jack would never play battlefield on Ps4." He responded and said that he was at a mates. So I asked him "will the next battlefield be futuristic?" He said this. Im reading this straight from my Ps4 messages. " I cant tell you much but it isn't going to be futuristic :). SO there you go im serious I actually talked to him. The dice LA camo gave him away.
+Kieran R the dice la camo is only for the developers of the game frags is only a you tuber that does vids on battlefield
+Kieran R nice try liar
+Kieran R I have dev tags and camps but I'm not a dev. so this could be fake.
+Kieran R DICE LA camo anyone can get...lol
will it be on twitch
God please be Bad Company 3
WW2
Yuki Terumi we haven't had a ww2 game in years
+Yuki Terumi I completely agree with you, we are a dying and rare breed my friend, no one cares about Bad Company anymore, they have all forgotten about Haggs, Sweetwater and Sarge, we will remember them, we will be the ones to carry on their memory. Ive been waiting for years for Bad Company 3, but our chances are looking not too bright my friend :(
Battlefield Buddy tell me about it, God i miss that trio.
We need real information! Damn announcement of an announcement. Ugh
Someone who works for Dice, just admitted to me it is not Bad Company 3. And he has proved he works for Dice many times on a forum over many years.
GET THE HYPE TRAIN READY!!!!!!!!!!
CHU CHU!
Chu chu !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
🚂CHU CHU🚂
Choo choo
+Tactical Turtle COOOWWWWAAAAAAAAAAARRRRDDDSSS *edit:* wrong game...
chu chu!!!! 🚂
no modern/future bs. hopefully the rumors are correct about Battlefield 1944.
how is modern bullshit? I can see future but we don't need another ww2 shooter we have had to many
+jamesyak52 Everyone was circlejerking for 2143, now everyone wants 1944, like what the fuck?
+sAy wHAAt? Sure, if you enjoy playing the same shooter games over and over that are over 10 years old. I can't think of a single triple A game in the past few years that wasn't modern or futuristic. The last 4 Battlefield games were modern.
+xeno's compilation of strategies and other CS things over saturation of future titles. Everyone wants a change.
I would love to see a future title in bf..just because cod fucked it up doesn't mean battlefield can't do it
the day that EA comes out with the trailer and game reveal is the same day as VE day which stands for Victory in Europe. Possibly hinting that it would take place around 1944 and 1945 in the European/Atlantic theater of WW2.
I honestly don't care about the theme. As long as they make it work and make it enjoyable.
+Just a Moose totally agree that's what I've always loved about Battlefield games it's enjoyable and demands teamwork and especially the longevity of each match.
I seriously hope battlefield goes back in time to previous wars instead of the futuristic bullshit
+Steven v they're running out of wars, bruh... and I don't think anyone wants to play battlefield: napoleonic wars
+Birthday Songs , Vietnam and WWII would be good.
Gavin Yong I'd be just as excited for WW2 on Frostbite 4 as the next guy, but I have a feeling they aren't gonna do a war they've already done
georjan velas you do know the first like 3
battlefields were in the past, right?
Heard there may also be a remastered BF1942 coming our way. My prayers have been answered.
What is up with all the future hate in the comments? Until now I was under the impression that 2142 had a pretty good reputation and 2143 was something usually awaited with good hopes.
I wouldn't mind a future setting but no walls running or Exo crap
+mergele1000 it's because the market is inundated with future crap right now
+herobrine_trolo Yeah its like the robot suit craze is the new Zombies
+herobrine_trolo it also was full of WW2 at some point you know?
BFassassinwithswag yeah but all the ww2 is completely outdated. I never said I wanted ww2, just anything but future.
In fact alternate history, but still in a similar timeline, would be most interesting to me
battlefield 3 was awesome, bf4 was meh and hardline was pretty much bf4. I hope bf5 (or bad company 3 :0) will be comparable to bf3
+Michael J. Cabose I thought BF3 was very good, and thought BF4 was fucking awesome.
BF2 was the best
+Michael J. Cabose I think a lot of people assume bf4 is "meh" because it was broken at launch, now I think it's just below bf3 in how much I like it because now it's a solid game. Hardline sucks #ftw
agreed
No BF4 was fun. Hardline doesn't amount.
It would be cool if they added 10 different time zones and weather for multiplayer maps. So for example, you could play siege of Shanghai in the middle of the night while it's raining and the next time you play it could be at dawn with clear skies.
Oh god almighty please no more hardline bullshit, no more futuristic crap, and please for the love of god no broken Multiplayer at launch. I hope they don't fuck it up like cod did.
This is EA were talking I'm 100% sure the game will be released just like bf4
Its not going to be hardline they said it. Hardline was made by a different company than all the others so ea could focus on bf5 and other games.
+Donald Trump Why would we believe YOU? xD
DaBuzzkeel They literally said it their self. But what can you expect out of a Clinton supporter? And one that questions things... bit hypocritical if you ask me.
Donald Trump Lol it was a joke, just like you
WHy the hell did I get a recommended notification? Dice please!
you were lying it's bf1
This came out 6 months ago...
its battle field 1..xD
No shit sherlock
Jack and Matimio's same video announcements eft
left
Hope they really get invited to the event cause they both deserve it.
+xKarma _ jack definitely will and matimio has gone to the others. As in bf4 and hardline. He should be at it alongside the entire group
another year playing battlefield 4.
that game never gets old man.
never mind its bf1 lmfao
Miranda Gamer I know lmao
guys stay tuned for BF Hardline 2 xD
Jesus I hope not
+Ben Doherty same dude😹
when I heard there was free dlc for hardline i was like. no thanks.
Back to WW1.
That's pretty awesome.