This is as good as any ted talk i've seen. You should submit it and get famous! Thanks for the lecture. I'm here for SEO and content architecture for my blog to please google. Thanks again.
This guy in the video has knowingly or unknowingly disrespected his as well as other cultures. But as the western culture implies - not knowing something cannot be accepted as an excuse. This video needs a few edits. If you're interested in knowing about those calculated reasons, write back. Because I fear western culture needs more knowledgeable, aware and respectful teachers than this guy in the video. But maybe teachers are also aligned with the culture they are born/grown up with.
Idea for record-store sort order: the average pixel colour of the album's cover, mapped to its position on the color spectrum. The store would be shaped as a rainbow, of course.
I've had multitudes of jobs where I am designing wayfinders, signage, retail spaces and displays, and now I work in UX/UI/Digital design. I've built a lot of websites. I'm quite obsessed with organizing things so people can find what they're looking for right away. Even how I organize my working files and name things is quite obsessive. And I do have a slight OCD. So.....maybe you're right! We are all on the spectrum. (Maybe I need to be an Information Architect!!)
12:36 FYI the prophet didn't write the Quran. the Quran was orally revealed by God to the final prophet, Muhammad, through the Gabriel (Jibril), incrementally over a period of some 23 years. How and when it was collected and made into a book is still debatable even among Muslims. And thank you for the great lecture!
I am not sure I am following the example of sorting the Koran. So, it is sorted by the length of the text (number of characters in the string) - how does that indicate that "everything is equally important"? Perhaps this was just the default value in the compiler's word processor. What makes the "because everything is equally important" interpretation more likely?
Hi! Actually, The Quran is not completely in length order - the 2nd chapter is the longest, and the last chapter is not the shortest, but it's more or less sorted by length of chapter. The chapters in the beginning are the longest ones and the ones at the end are the shortest ones. That said, I think the point the instructor in the video was making was that by not sorting chronologically like other religious texts, it implies that the content is important irregardless of how it's arranged and in which sequence it's mentioned.
"Hierarchy based on the bands they've spawned since." So I am assuming he meant how many more bands each of the player founded or played in after playing on that album.
Nope, it is an actual hierarchy. Yes, the common idea of colors is largely categorical (yellow, red, blue...). But when organising colors on a spectrum - which I assume you mean by that - you are dealing with hierarchy. You don't just put blues next to yellows and yellows next to blacks. Where do you put orange and purple books in this setup? And what about mostly red book with yellow font and mostly red book with blue font on the cover? See, every book will have a "logical" place on a rainbow spectrum. It cannot be singled out in a category with a clear boundary. So again, you are dealing with hierarchy here.
Just informing that Quran hasn’t listed to longest to shortest. Quran has 30 chapter (each chapter 20 pages) and 114 surah. First surah is 7 ayah(sentence) long and the second surah is 286 ayah. The arrangement of Quran goes like 7-286-200-176-120-165-206-75-129-109-123-111-43-52-99-128 and so on. My point is if you are getting out of your comfort zone and talk about religion you must do your research well, since its a big part of ux process. I totally admire the knowledge in this video but think its really useful. But after Quran topic I wonder what other misinformations he gaves.
This information organization classification (LATCH) is simplistic and incomplete. Basically you're saying you can put information into groups (whether with interconnected elements or not). But there are at least several more ways to organize information without putting it into groups. Here are several examples. Where does this information organization fits into your model? 1. A list of acquaintances for a particular number of people. 2. A map of websites with forward and back links to each other information? Location by your definition? But it's not aerial or spacial. 3. Processed information such as arithmetic done on numbers, I would argue that this is information organization (which we might disagree). But it for sure doesn't fit your model. Not having consistent and clear definition of information or data or organization is insane. Having lengthy discussions about terms that are not clearly defined is even more so.
This is as good as any ted talk i've seen. You should submit it and get famous! Thanks for the lecture. I'm here for SEO and content architecture for my blog to please google. Thanks again.
This guy in the video has knowingly or unknowingly disrespected his as well as other cultures. But as the western culture implies - not knowing something cannot be accepted as an excuse. This video needs a few edits. If you're interested in knowing about those calculated reasons, write back. Because I fear western culture needs more knowledgeable, aware and respectful teachers than this guy in the video. But maybe teachers are also aligned with the culture they are born/grown up with.
I do IA and this is the most succient and yet informative among what I've heard, read, or encountered.
Idea for record-store sort order: the average pixel colour of the album's cover, mapped to its position on the color spectrum. The store would be shaped as a rainbow, of course.
I love this, especially the exercise with organizing the music shop. And apparently I'm now an Information Architect! :)
These students didn't laugh nearly enough. Good lecture, and funny!
Easy to be understood. Really like the section that audiences shared their ideas.
That was beautiful. Using those examples to explain how IA works. Thanks!
So simple and fun way to explain IA. Post watching this video you certainly are qualified IA
I've had multitudes of jobs where I am designing wayfinders, signage, retail spaces and displays, and now I work in UX/UI/Digital design. I've built a lot of websites. I'm quite obsessed with organizing things so people can find what they're looking for right away. Even how I organize my working files and name things is quite obsessive. And I do have a slight OCD. So.....maybe you're right! We are all on the spectrum. (Maybe I need to be an Information Architect!!)
Happy to have found this presentation, well done.
Thanks for the lovely lecture🍷
12:36 FYI the prophet didn't write the Quran. the Quran was orally revealed by God to the final prophet, Muhammad, through the Gabriel (Jibril), incrementally over a period of some 23 years. How and when it was collected and made into a book is still debatable even among Muslims.
And thank you for the great lecture!
♥
Very good indeed. Thanks for sharing!
Buy tickets for UX Brighton 2024: UX & AI today uxbri.org/2024/?TsH8y5fbfX8&
I am not sure I am following the example of sorting the Koran. So, it is sorted by the length of the text (number of characters in the string) - how does that indicate that "everything is equally important"?
Perhaps this was just the default value in the compiler's word processor. What makes the "because everything is equally important" interpretation more likely?
Hi! Actually, The Quran is not completely in length order - the 2nd chapter is the longest, and the last chapter is not the shortest, but it's more or less sorted by length of chapter. The chapters in the beginning are the longest ones and the ones at the end are the shortest ones.
That said, I think the point the instructor in the video was making was that by not sorting chronologically like other religious texts, it implies that the content is important irregardless of how it's arranged and in which sequence it's mentioned.
Great speaker!
can anyone please tell me .. what type of hierarchy sorting the person suggested at time 19.57 ?
"Hierarchy based on the bands they've spawned since." So I am assuming he meant how many more bands each of the player founded or played in after playing on that album.
awesome!!
Let’s say you organize your books by colour, is that a 6th way or is it just a category?
I think that'd fall under category!
Color is a category.
Nope, it is an actual hierarchy.
Yes, the common idea of colors is largely categorical (yellow, red, blue...). But when organising colors on a spectrum - which I assume you mean by that - you are dealing with hierarchy. You don't just put blues next to yellows and yellows next to blacks. Where do you put orange and purple books in this setup? And what about mostly red book with yellow font and mostly red book with blue font on the cover?
See, every book will have a "logical" place on a rainbow spectrum. It cannot be singled out in a category with a clear boundary. So again, you are dealing with hierarchy here.
it says 10 minutes but the video is 21 minutes? :)
My question to this teacher is how he interprets the word 'respect' in his life?
Just informing that Quran hasn’t listed to longest to shortest. Quran has 30 chapter (each chapter 20 pages) and 114 surah. First surah is 7 ayah(sentence) long and the second surah is 286 ayah. The arrangement of Quran goes like 7-286-200-176-120-165-206-75-129-109-123-111-43-52-99-128 and so on.
My point is if you are getting out of your comfort zone and talk about religion you must do your research well, since its a big part of ux process. I totally admire the knowledge in this video but think its really useful. But after Quran topic I wonder what other misinformations he gaves.
This information organization classification (LATCH) is simplistic and incomplete. Basically you're saying you can put information into groups (whether with interconnected elements or not). But there are at least several more ways to organize information without putting it into groups. Here are several examples. Where does this information organization fits into your model?
1. A list of acquaintances for a particular number of people.
2. A map of websites with forward and back links to each other information?
Location by your definition? But it's not aerial or spacial.
3. Processed information such as arithmetic done on numbers, I would argue that this is information organization (which we might disagree). But it for sure doesn't fit your model.
Not having consistent and clear definition of information or data or organization is insane. Having lengthy discussions about terms that are not clearly defined is even more so.
the exotic beans is a problem with modern languages, it's probably