One of the best descriptions of the process I've seen. it would be nice to see it done with bilateral dimensions. I'm not a fan of min max, because I would rather manufacturing know the dimension I really want, without them having to do the math.
I’m not sure that you can calculate the standard deviation like you did, unless you consider that the CP for each “components” is 1. Then you can apply the formula that you did.
At about 14.34 time in video I see 3 times SQRT of 0.0017 = 0.125 ///// When I do ( SQRT 0.0017 times 3) I get 0.12369 on my TI36. Just checking . Great video am I reading it wrong ?
![SAFEPLANET - ดาวเคราะห์ [ THE PLANET ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/4X1XL3I_k3c/mqdefault.jpg)
![[#2024MAMA] BIGBANG (빅뱅) - 뱅뱅뱅 (BANG BANG BANG) + FANTASTIC BABY | Mnet 241123 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EQsYfiPR9uM/mqdefault.jpg)
One of the best descriptions of the process I've seen. it would be nice to see it done with bilateral dimensions. I'm not a fan of min max, because I would rather manufacturing know the dimension I really want, without them having to do the math.
I’m not sure that you can calculate the standard deviation like you did, unless you consider that the CP for each “components” is 1. Then you can apply the formula that you did.
Great video! Can you perform stack up analysis for one part that has both a chain and baseline dimensions?
extremely well explained concepts, thanks a lot. please make more videos. thanks again
sigma methodology has been demonstrated very nicely
Very well explained. Thanks for making this video.
John, Thank you for making and sharing this Video.
Very Informative!
Thank you!
Quite Easily Explained :-), great job John
Great lecture . Thank you.
At about 14.34 time in video I see 3 times SQRT of 0.0017 = 0.125 ///// When I do ( SQRT 0.0017 times 3) I get 0.12369 on my TI36. Just checking . Great video am I reading it wrong ?
John, can you please share the presentation?
This helped out quite a lot.
thank you
Very clear explanation thank you sir....
Hi Sir,
can you explain the cumulative effect of tolerance based on Sure fit law and truncated normal law
Yes, that is an error it should be 0.124.
+John Jackman His tolerances used in this course are to .000", so he rounded as such
In the video (13:39) how do you get the numbers for the SD: .0167; .0333
Kenneth Younger divide by 6 because he is using 6 sigma
Thanks bro.
What is a good book to study about this stuff ?
Well explained
Thanks
Thank you, its good
Good Video. please improve your audio quality.
Well done, this lecture made stack ups more understandable. Thanks
I know I'm pretty randomly asking but does anyone know of a good site to watch newly released movies online ?
@Deshawn Ahmir I would suggest Flixzone. You can find it by googling =)
@Deshawn Ahmir i watch on Flixzone. Just google for it :)
Why +/- 3 Sigma total addition to dimn 8 and why not +/- 6 sigma total...???
and some times there isn't a tolerance at all; it just has to manually be made a certain size.
Very nice explanation
Very Useful
Easy to understand. Tthank you
How did you find 8 as a value for 6sigma..i'm sorry but i didn't understood..
tHX!
+Marian Silian (8.2+7.8)/2 = 8
7:11
б .@ бб