Tolerance Stackup: Simple Assembly

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 69

  • @Kamabushi999
    @Kamabushi999 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Finally, someone whose accent I can understand. Thank you very much, I am subscribed. The teacher is very important, we can't all learn from the same style of teaching.

    • @RDeanOdell
      @RDeanOdell  2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Great to hear! I wasn’t aware I had a particular accent, but I’m happy the video works for you.

    • @Kamabushi999
      @Kamabushi999 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@RDeanOdell
      I meant your enunciation is American
      and I can understand
      Most videos are from India and can not understand their pronunciation
      I am pretty much tone deaf i guess.

    • @ninadgadre3934
      @ninadgadre3934 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@RDeanOdell All speakers have accents ;), only that we consider our personal accent as default, and other accents as 'accents'. Love your video, thanks for the simple explanation!

  • @MPKFPV
    @MPKFPV 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    The phase of your explanation meets my understanding speed, thanks a lot for your time in making people learn what you gained. Awesome work 🙏🏽

    • @RDeanOdell
      @RDeanOdell  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thanks so much!

  • @danc1279
    @danc1279 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    (as one who for 8yrs. taught classroom CAD & co-wrote user guides) Really, really well done! smooth pace, good example & diagram, articulate easy to understand audio, even the very thoughtful 'quiet' jazz in background, further putting the listener at ease and makes the mind open. another 'like' & new subscriber here.

  • @praveenmuduli9255
    @praveenmuduli9255 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    U made it so simple. Thank you for doing this.

  • @pratikbabhulkar2295
    @pratikbabhulkar2295 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you so much for making this video. Four years of college and you explained it in under 7 minutes

  • @darkside2326
    @darkside2326 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You just blew my mind. I'm not a native speaker, but I understand everything you explained in detail. Thank you.

  • @nishantbhosle1268
    @nishantbhosle1268 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Best video on WC analysis ever! Good job mate! Thanks for this video!

  • @ajayramm1315
    @ajayramm1315 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Dude you made it more simple for worst case, thank you

  • @joshuasaha5068
    @joshuasaha5068 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I've been a working engineer work several years and your videos are still helpful to reference! Thank you

  • @Gulam360
    @Gulam360 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanku sir i am from India 🇮🇳 it's very important knowledge for us i am working in R&D department in world top 10 tractor manufacturing company thanks

  • @srose899
    @srose899 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

    If you're only interested in the gap, you don't need to include the outer dimensions. You can eliminate 4, make 5 just from one end of the pocket to the other end, and eliminate 6.

  • @harikrishnan-ur2mf
    @harikrishnan-ur2mf 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The clean and clear explanation can you do more videos in assembly-oriented stack-ups...

    • @RDeanOdell
      @RDeanOdell  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Thank you! I’ll get some more tolerance stack up videos out soon.

  • @HurstNidec
    @HurstNidec ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you for this real world demonstration.

    • @RDeanOdell
      @RDeanOdell  ปีที่แล้ว

      You’re welcome, thanks for watching!

  • @ketandeshpande6149
    @ketandeshpande6149 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The way of explanation is very simple and understandable. Lots of things to learn from you. Kudos!

  • @nguyentri5467
    @nguyentri5467 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for your teaching. Really appreciate

    • @RDeanOdell
      @RDeanOdell  ปีที่แล้ว

      You are very welcome, thanks!

  • @argentosebastian
    @argentosebastian 2 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    There is no need for background music but the content is great. Thanks

  • @imrghulam1
    @imrghulam1 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video. Lets say the nominal clearance is 1mm if the positive direction to right. By shifting the positive direction to left then the nominal clearance gives -1mm. So, how to determine the direction because the sign changes for the nominal clearance which depends of the positive direction.

  • @anilkumarpasala
    @anilkumarpasala 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ur the best. I have learned the concept just with 2 videos. Definitely you don't have many views for your valuable videos because people are not interested in valuable content their interest is always on tiktok. Don't get dissatisfied please educate us

    • @RDeanOdell
      @RDeanOdell  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thankyou so much! I'm thrilled my videos are helpful!

  • @larsjustesen297
    @larsjustesen297 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks mate i just started a new job and what you are learning me is much better information than the old dudes in the measurements department ever could have teach me 😂

    • @RDeanOdell
      @RDeanOdell  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Great to hear! I’m glad you find my content useful at work.

  • @rhranjithkumar34
    @rhranjithkumar34 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very helpful video sir 🎉🎉🎉

  • @vinaysalvi8203
    @vinaysalvi8203 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks a lot for your hard work to explain it in such a simple way, also the inspection check which you do hands on really makes it easy to understand GD&T, really really thanks a lot for your efforts, please do make such videos which makes understanding engineering so easy and fun. Thanks a lot!!!

  • @MechInvent
    @MechInvent 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You would make a killer joker with that voice 😎
    But in all seriousness, thanks for the clear teaching video.

  • @IndiTechValves
    @IndiTechValves 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great explanation. Easy to understand.

    • @RDeanOdell
      @RDeanOdell  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks!

  • @DustinFletcher-gi1nx
    @DustinFletcher-gi1nx หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm curious - In order to remove the external dimensions and reduce down to 4, how would this affect the assembly of other parts? I feel like this would be done by changing the datum to one of the internal edges of the channel, correct? And if that's the case where you need to change the datum, would you then want to make the datum based on which part being manufactured requires the tightest tolerance?

  • @handsnow
    @handsnow 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I was just wondering if we could change 5+/-0.02 to 5.13+/-0.02, it seems also meet the requirement

  • @learnkartmechanical1309
    @learnkartmechanical1309 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    1.please explain with reference to Worst case and RSS method.
    2.What is Assembly shift in stack-up
    3.How to use cp and cpk process capability. for tolerances
    4.How to create vector loop (Shorter loop with examples)
    5.What is ppm Rejection how to understand it
    6.What to do in case if tolerances are not equal bilateral
    Thanks for your Efforts appreciated.

    • @RDeanOdell
      @RDeanOdell  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi,
      Let me see what I can do to address some of your questions.

  • @connerg019
    @connerg019 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Holly fuck this guy is smart

  • @jojolicos3717
    @jojolicos3717 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thank you for this informative video.

    • @RDeanOdell
      @RDeanOdell  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You are so welcome! Thanks for watching.

  • @owaindavies7145
    @owaindavies7145 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is there a reason why the slot dimension at 4:44 is +/- 0.2 rather than +/- 0.4?
    My thinking is that the two ends of the slot both have +/- 0.2, so regardless the gap must be +/- 0.2 from both end stops - so 0.4?

  • @davidnguyen8045
    @davidnguyen8045 3 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา +1

    great tutorial, but the background music is so distracting

  • @mvmcali6900
    @mvmcali6900 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This dude is Tarzan with an engineering degree

    • @RDeanOdell
      @RDeanOdell  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Lol, I’ll take it. Thanks for watching.

  • @ud4458
    @ud4458 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi Mr. Odell. Can you recommend a resource if I want to learn to calculate a automotive wheel bearing and hub, the effects of circular runout on the overall hub runout ?

  • @andrehansen2488
    @andrehansen2488 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Really good video. Thank you for that!
    Music a bit too loud

  • @jon-williammurphy9780
    @jon-williammurphy9780 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well, no, at 3:40 when you say "this part wouldn't work" - that's not true, statistically this part would work / not work HALF the time. Tightening the tolerances doesn't it just "might not meet the requirements" it's entirely identical.

  • @mfatih1068
    @mfatih1068 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Perfect!!

  • @deathwrenchcustom
    @deathwrenchcustom 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How is this beneficial over just using a unilateral tolerance such as 3.000 +.100 -.000 or a min/max dimension?

    • @RDeanOdell
      @RDeanOdell  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi,
      I use bilateral equal tolerances to save a step in calculation. If I use a unilateral dimension I would have to convert it into an bilateral equal tolerance to “fit” into the table to do the arithmetic.

  • @Reapwhatsown
    @Reapwhatsown ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thought he was going show the RSS calc that has worst case interference situation very improbable.
    For each part the MMC condition is ~2% probable.
    For them all to be at MMC simultaneously is much much less.

    • @RDeanOdell
      @RDeanOdell  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi, yes this is just simple worst case analysis. It is very unlikely everything comes in at worst case, but in my opinion, this gives some room for error in the stackup. If something is not accounted for, there is so much conservatism built in already that it should be okay.

  • @OMR-ed4qs
    @OMR-ed4qs ปีที่แล้ว

    what if you made it 3.08 instead of 3.09? The max will be 0.16 and min will be 0, so zero interference.

  • @yonnileung
    @yonnileung 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Can apply RSS to calculate with 6 sigma...

  • @raghavendrapalekar6739
    @raghavendrapalekar6739 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can you pls share one case study...

  • @josephtan7720
    @josephtan7720 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Simple and precise

  • @leak-proofengineeringindia2084
    @leak-proofengineeringindia2084 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hello
    I'm using it for unilateral Tolerance but not working, plz suggest me the solution.
    Can I use it for bilateral unequal Tolerances?

    • @RDeanOdell
      @RDeanOdell  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi,
      Unilateral tolerances must be converted to bilateral equal tolerances to do the arithmetic in the stackup.

  • @DuduHan-s7w
    @DuduHan-s7w ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great

  • @Farshad-Parvin
    @Farshad-Parvin ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video, would've been even better if it was in metric lol

  • @giridharpalvai7516
    @giridharpalvai7516 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir why we are using mmc and lmc in drawing

  • @Kpax72
    @Kpax72 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What about hole to hole basic dims not called out from the datum? Stack error

  • @barnardjoubert9849
    @barnardjoubert9849 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cant watch with loud background music.

    • @fernandob4956
      @fernandob4956 ปีที่แล้ว

      I agree. Very good instructor and lesson. But why the background music?