(as one who for 8yrs. taught classroom CAD & co-wrote user guides) Really, really well done! smooth pace, good example & diagram, articulate easy to understand audio, even the very thoughtful 'quiet' jazz in background, further putting the listener at ease and makes the mind open. another 'like' & new subscriber here.
Finally, someone whose accent I can understand. Thank you very much, I am subscribed. The teacher is very important, we can't all learn from the same style of teaching.
@@RDeanOdell I meant your enunciation is American and I can understand Most videos are from India and can not understand their pronunciation I am pretty much tone deaf i guess.
@@RDeanOdell All speakers have accents ;), only that we consider our personal accent as default, and other accents as 'accents'. Love your video, thanks for the simple explanation!
If you're only interested in the gap, you don't need to include the outer dimensions. You can eliminate 4, make 5 just from one end of the pocket to the other end, and eliminate 6.
Great video. Lets say the nominal clearance is 1mm if the positive direction to right. By shifting the positive direction to left then the nominal clearance gives -1mm. So, how to determine the direction because the sign changes for the nominal clearance which depends of the positive direction.
Thanks mate i just started a new job and what you are learning me is much better information than the old dudes in the measurements department ever could have teach me 😂
Ur the best. I have learned the concept just with 2 videos. Definitely you don't have many views for your valuable videos because people are not interested in valuable content their interest is always on tiktok. Don't get dissatisfied please educate us
1.please explain with reference to Worst case and RSS method. 2.What is Assembly shift in stack-up 3.How to use cp and cpk process capability. for tolerances 4.How to create vector loop (Shorter loop with examples) 5.What is ppm Rejection how to understand it 6.What to do in case if tolerances are not equal bilateral Thanks for your Efforts appreciated.
Thanks a lot for your hard work to explain it in such a simple way, also the inspection check which you do hands on really makes it easy to understand GD&T, really really thanks a lot for your efforts, please do make such videos which makes understanding engineering so easy and fun. Thanks a lot!!!
Thought he was going show the RSS calc that has worst case interference situation very improbable. For each part the MMC condition is ~2% probable. For them all to be at MMC simultaneously is much much less.
Hi, yes this is just simple worst case analysis. It is very unlikely everything comes in at worst case, but in my opinion, this gives some room for error in the stackup. If something is not accounted for, there is so much conservatism built in already that it should be okay.
Hi Mr. Odell. Can you recommend a resource if I want to learn to calculate a automotive wheel bearing and hub, the effects of circular runout on the overall hub runout ?
Hi, I use bilateral equal tolerances to save a step in calculation. If I use a unilateral dimension I would have to convert it into an bilateral equal tolerance to “fit” into the table to do the arithmetic.
I'm curious - In order to remove the external dimensions and reduce down to 4, how would this affect the assembly of other parts? I feel like this would be done by changing the datum to one of the internal edges of the channel, correct? And if that's the case where you need to change the datum, would you then want to make the datum based on which part being manufactured requires the tightest tolerance?
Is there a reason why the slot dimension at 4:44 is +/- 0.2 rather than +/- 0.4? My thinking is that the two ends of the slot both have +/- 0.2, so regardless the gap must be +/- 0.2 from both end stops - so 0.4?
Well, no, at 3:40 when you say "this part wouldn't work" - that's not true, statistically this part would work / not work HALF the time. Tightening the tolerances doesn't it just "might not meet the requirements" it's entirely identical.
The phase of your explanation meets my understanding speed, thanks a lot for your time in making people learn what you gained. Awesome work 🙏🏽
Thanks so much!
(as one who for 8yrs. taught classroom CAD & co-wrote user guides) Really, really well done! smooth pace, good example & diagram, articulate easy to understand audio, even the very thoughtful 'quiet' jazz in background, further putting the listener at ease and makes the mind open. another 'like' & new subscriber here.
Finally, someone whose accent I can understand. Thank you very much, I am subscribed. The teacher is very important, we can't all learn from the same style of teaching.
Great to hear! I wasn’t aware I had a particular accent, but I’m happy the video works for you.
@@RDeanOdell
I meant your enunciation is American
and I can understand
Most videos are from India and can not understand their pronunciation
I am pretty much tone deaf i guess.
@@RDeanOdell All speakers have accents ;), only that we consider our personal accent as default, and other accents as 'accents'. Love your video, thanks for the simple explanation!
Thank you so much for making this video. Four years of college and you explained it in under 7 minutes
You just blew my mind. I'm not a native speaker, but I understand everything you explained in detail. Thank you.
Thanku sir i am from India 🇮🇳 it's very important knowledge for us i am working in R&D department in world top 10 tractor manufacturing company thanks
I've been a working engineer work several years and your videos are still helpful to reference! Thank you
U made it so simple. Thank you for doing this.
The clean and clear explanation can you do more videos in assembly-oriented stack-ups...
Thank you! I’ll get some more tolerance stack up videos out soon.
Best video on WC analysis ever! Good job mate! Thanks for this video!
Thanks so much!
Dude you made it more simple for worst case, thank you
If you're only interested in the gap, you don't need to include the outer dimensions. You can eliminate 4, make 5 just from one end of the pocket to the other end, and eliminate 6.
What a simplified way of explanation 👌
Great video. Lets say the nominal clearance is 1mm if the positive direction to right. By shifting the positive direction to left then the nominal clearance gives -1mm. So, how to determine the direction because the sign changes for the nominal clearance which depends of the positive direction.
Thank you for this real world demonstration.
You’re welcome, thanks for watching!
The way of explanation is very simple and understandable. Lots of things to learn from you. Kudos!
Thanks so much!
This dude is Tarzan with an engineering degree
Lol, I’ll take it. Thanks for watching.
Thanks for your teaching. Really appreciate
You are very welcome, thanks!
Thanks mate i just started a new job and what you are learning me is much better information than the old dudes in the measurements department ever could have teach me 😂
Great to hear! I’m glad you find my content useful at work.
Ur the best. I have learned the concept just with 2 videos. Definitely you don't have many views for your valuable videos because people are not interested in valuable content their interest is always on tiktok. Don't get dissatisfied please educate us
Thankyou so much! I'm thrilled my videos are helpful!
1.please explain with reference to Worst case and RSS method.
2.What is Assembly shift in stack-up
3.How to use cp and cpk process capability. for tolerances
4.How to create vector loop (Shorter loop with examples)
5.What is ppm Rejection how to understand it
6.What to do in case if tolerances are not equal bilateral
Thanks for your Efforts appreciated.
Hi,
Let me see what I can do to address some of your questions.
Thanks a lot for your hard work to explain it in such a simple way, also the inspection check which you do hands on really makes it easy to understand GD&T, really really thanks a lot for your efforts, please do make such videos which makes understanding engineering so easy and fun. Thanks a lot!!!
You would make a killer joker with that voice 😎
But in all seriousness, thanks for the clear teaching video.
Great explanation. Easy to understand.
Thanks!
Very helpful video sir 🎉🎉🎉
Superb explanation
thank you for this informative video.
You are so welcome! Thanks for watching.
Really good video. Thank you for that!
Music a bit too loud
There is no need for background music but the content is great. Thanks
Thought he was going show the RSS calc that has worst case interference situation very improbable.
For each part the MMC condition is ~2% probable.
For them all to be at MMC simultaneously is much much less.
Hi, yes this is just simple worst case analysis. It is very unlikely everything comes in at worst case, but in my opinion, this gives some room for error in the stackup. If something is not accounted for, there is so much conservatism built in already that it should be okay.
Holly fuck this guy is smart
Hi Mr. Odell. Can you recommend a resource if I want to learn to calculate a automotive wheel bearing and hub, the effects of circular runout on the overall hub runout ?
How is this beneficial over just using a unilateral tolerance such as 3.000 +.100 -.000 or a min/max dimension?
Hi,
I use bilateral equal tolerances to save a step in calculation. If I use a unilateral dimension I would have to convert it into an bilateral equal tolerance to “fit” into the table to do the arithmetic.
I'm curious - In order to remove the external dimensions and reduce down to 4, how would this affect the assembly of other parts? I feel like this would be done by changing the datum to one of the internal edges of the channel, correct? And if that's the case where you need to change the datum, would you then want to make the datum based on which part being manufactured requires the tightest tolerance?
Can apply RSS to calculate with 6 sigma...
I was just wondering if we could change 5+/-0.02 to 5.13+/-0.02, it seems also meet the requirement
what if you made it 3.08 instead of 3.09? The max will be 0.16 and min will be 0, so zero interference.
Can you pls share one case study...
Is there a reason why the slot dimension at 4:44 is +/- 0.2 rather than +/- 0.4?
My thinking is that the two ends of the slot both have +/- 0.2, so regardless the gap must be +/- 0.2 from both end stops - so 0.4?
Well, no, at 3:40 when you say "this part wouldn't work" - that's not true, statistically this part would work / not work HALF the time. Tightening the tolerances doesn't it just "might not meet the requirements" it's entirely identical.
great tutorial, but the background music is so distracting
Perfect!!
Thanks so much!
Simple and precise
Thankyou!
THanks a lot
Great
Thanks!
Hello
I'm using it for unilateral Tolerance but not working, plz suggest me the solution.
Can I use it for bilateral unequal Tolerances?
Hi,
Unilateral tolerances must be converted to bilateral equal tolerances to do the arithmetic in the stackup.
Great video, would've been even better if it was in metric lol
Sir why we are using mmc and lmc in drawing
Cant watch with loud background music.
I agree. Very good instructor and lesson. But why the background music?
What about hole to hole basic dims not called out from the datum? Stack error