Canon R100 vs iPhone | Can a $479 Entry Level Camera Beat a Smartphone?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 ก.ค. 2024
- Grab my new ESSENTIALS Lightroom Preset Pack! 📷 foxtailshop.com/products/esse...
The R100 is Canon's newest mirrorless camera, and it's now the cheapest interchangeable lens camera that they sell. But is it worth picking up to upgrade from a smartphone? It depends...
Purchase the R100 Here 👇
geni.us/ej0ihE5
Get the 50mm f/1.8 Here 👇
geni.us/d1gi0
Purchase the R50 Here 👇
geni.us/4LRU
R100 Best Photo Settings: • Canon R100 Best Photo ...
R50 review: • Canon R50: The BEST Be...
Check out my other channel! / @adamharig
Follow me on Instagram: / adamharig_
Get Great Deals On Used Camera Gear at KEH! shareasale.com/r.cfm?b=236844...
Get TubeBuddy To Grow Your Channel: www.tubebuddy.com/FOXTAILWHIPZ
For sponsorship, product reviews, and collaboration, you can email me here: foxtailwhipz@gmail.com
Gear I Recommend:
Cameras Under $100: • 5 Awesome Cameras Unde...
Cameras Under $500: • 5 Amazing Cameras For ...
Cinema Cameras Under $500: • Best Budget Cinema Cam...
Cinema Cameras Under $1000: • Best Budget Cinema Cam...
Favorite Budget Camera: amzn.to/3OpWFbD
Favorite Budget Lens: amzn.to/43VtFOP
Great Wireless Mic: amzn.to/3KuaZPl
Do-It-All Tripod: amzn.to/3qgZRyt
My Gear:
Cameras
My TH-cam Camera: amzn.to/3Dkd0Ln
Secondary TH-cam Camera: amzn.to/3OpWFbD
My Photo Camera: amzn.to/3B7pKSx
Lenses
My A Roll Lens: amzn.to/3Dffnz1
Wide Angle Lens: amzn.to/3U1GByK
Portrait Lens: amzn.to/3RRTdXt
Other Gear
Tripod: amzn.to/3ElcFaX
Travel Tripod: amzn.to/3xHI6YZ
Mini Tripod: amzn.to/3SaEAin
Microphone: amzn.to/3qy7gWo
Editing Computer: tinyurl.com/mvy2az6w
Headphones: amzn.to/3B5Kvyf
Mouse: amzn.to/3RPp1fC
Gimbal: amzn.to/3L5wsgp
Main Studio Light: amzn.to/3xdfB5M
Accent Lights: amzn.to/3xfqNPf
AFFILIATE DISCLOSURE: Some of the links used in the description are affiliate links, so if you purchase through them I may be compensated.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Time stamps
0:00 - Intro
2:35 - Photo Comparison
3:52 - Video Comparison
5:02 - R100 + 50mm f1.8
6:11 - Sharpness Comparison
6:58 - Recommendations
#r100 #iphone #canon
Grab my new ESSENTIALS Lightroom Preset Pack! 📷 foxtailshop.com/products/essentials-preset-pack
The title should be "can 1500$ phone beat 500$ camera?"
In my opinion, iPhone photos look over saturated and artificially (over)sharpened (because they are. I hate that every phone manufacturer is doing that). On the other hand R100 videos look like crap.
I'm sorry,it looks like you don't know how to use the camera.
Iphone photos sure,look great. But are they clear when you zoom in? they are only good for instagram photos.
Try shooting an actual wedding with an iphone , u’ll know why real camera still rules haha
Or architecture photography. It was hellish experience
@@MaiElizabeth indeed hahaha... or any indoor low light venue
Stop crying soon mobiles will take over your real cameras😂😂
@@BruceLee-go2vy keep dreaming... let apple collect money from ppl like u so that they can build bigger park hahahaha
iphone tele lens very worst.
I just using r10(apsc)with kit lens is better so much.
If you want better dof, full frame camera with 50mm1.8 is very enough!
The R100 will beat cheap smart phones every time and more expensive ones in the right hands. I have the iphone 14 pro and it has its uses, but it over-processes pictures as in your examples.
I've been taking product shots for my wife's bakery on a Canon 7D and it knocks the socks off the iPhone 14 pro I have.
@@chasing-liberty I am not surprised :)
I recently got an older M50 and noticed that it took better pictures across the board with the kit lens when compared to my galaxy s23 ultra. I only got the M50 to learn how to shoot in manual and I prefer taking pictures a lot more with the canon.
The M50 still remains a gem to this day!
Hey Adam, nice video! I would love to see a video about pro-mist filters and the Tiffen alternatives that are out there. I know you are a big fan of the Tiffen pro-mist but i would like to know if the (often cheaper) solutions by other brands can keep up.
Thanks for the great video as always :)
I don't really know photography but how is this possible? How much does the camera used in the iphone cost or is it mainly to processing power?
What of cannon D77 do you think is a good buy or I should buy an iPhone 13 Pro Max?
would it be better with raw plus lightroom edits?
I have an iPhone 13 mini and a Canon R100. I mainly shoot in "portrait" for still photos and "cinematic" for video on my iPhone 13 mini. As for my R100 I have two lenses being a 100mm and a 24-105mm zoom lens. I prefer my iPhone for 4K video and I much prefer my R100 for photos. I use a mount adapter to mount my EF lenses to my R100. The mount adapter costs $130. My EF 100mm lens cost me $600., used. And my 24-105mm lens I goes for $130., used. I recommend spending the $130., to get the used 24-105mm lens over the kit lens for the R100. The iPhone 14 Pro is great. I look forward to the iPhone 15 Pro Max with it's 7 focal length in one lens, but it cost's $1200. I would rather get a nice full frame Canon camera body for $1200. That i've experienced two nice lenses on my R100, those two lenses blow my iPhone 13 mini camera out of the water. I am a hobby photographer. I mainly shoot flower n foliage photos.
Great video... Crisp and clear
If you know how to use manual mode any aps-c sensor no matter the brand will out perform the iPhone 14 max or the Samsung galaxy ultra 23. The only thing that those phone do like an expensive camera is the low light performance.
They will both do significantly better macro than the kit lenses, or most non macro specific lenses, that’s the benefit of scale in a small sensor size
Thank you so much! I was looking at this camera but I have the 14 Pro Max and my husband has the Pro, so we will stick with our phone until we can afford a more expensive line. I'll be looking at more videos to see if you have other comparisons with mirrorless cameras that are more effective than our phones! Love the side by sides!
This applies to all cameras out there. Even the $1500 R7 image quality is going to look exactly the same as the R100 in auto mode. So if you prefer the iPhone images in this video, stick to the iPhone forever.
This video is a bit misleading tho and the R100 image quality is much better even in the samples shown in the video. Over-sharpening and over-saturation of the iPhone is NOT a good thing for real photographers.
If you want the biggest jump in both photo and video quality, the $1200 R8 is the best value PRO camera you can get rn.
Also, DON'T get the kit lens no matter what camera you purchase.
Try printing anything bigger than A4 with a camera phone , picture starts to look over processed . Camera phones are great for putting pics and videos on social media sites .
I wonder how the r100 images would look with a L series lens
Very helpful video.
I’m glad it helped!
Thank you for saving money for some new people waiting huge different from the camera.
Are you aware there’s a lot of processing from the iPhone photos? The moment you take it and sometimes even before you click you can actually see all the processing and computing happening. So when you say “no edits” then I say that’s untrue.
Yeah but I don’t have to do any of those edits or think about them. Idk why camera people are weird when it comes to phone cameras. Like honestly it’s crazy how smartphones are basically better than most starter cameras.
Underrated channel.
Thanks for this video comparison.
Of course can. Even my entry level EOS 2000D beats the best smartphone cameras now. And I know you can take very good photos with phone cameras also. And also, why it seems like those US prices always seem cheaper than for example the prices we have here in Finland. Lucky Americans?
Less taxes = cheaper goods
The kit lens is 380€ and with a 50mm F1.8 it’s 500€ on 淘宝. It’s very cheap but it doesn’t serve the porpoise of totally replacing my smartphone… I wish it would also take selfies
Thanks for this video! It’s the content I love and need 😌I’m honestly not sure what was the point of canon making this model when they made the R10 and R50. Everyone already thinks the R50 is the M50’s replacement so I’m just a little stumped about why this guy exists? Is it supposed to be an even more entry level camera?? Also I stopped believing in the kit lenses so when I upgraded I just got the body and use a sigma lens!
Yeah i agree with you, i guess to replace the rebel lineup with mirrorless? I mean it's 2023 and this thing still has a fixed display (professionals camera too like 1D but people that buy that can buy a monitor too)
It's basically to make the eos R50 a more compelling choice.
Companies like Canon really shoot themselves in the foot by including kit lenses like this. Maybe it was fine back in the day, but the average first-time naive consumer is going to compare it to what they know (their phone) and rightfully conclude it sucks. They'd be better off including a fast 35 and relying on digital zoom only.
That's why I think Fuji tend to be more popular with the younger crowd, something like a Canon looks like "you buy this to get better photos" then it just doesn't, whereas Fuji looks like "you buy this for a unique experience" and it does just that. Of course a more experienced photographer could get superior photos even out of the kit lens, but that's not generally who is buying kit-lens entry-level ILCs.
Please do a canon r50 vs iphone 15 pro max.
Interesting comparison but it is quite clear that all smartphone vendors rely on heavy postprocessing to output the image. I don't quite see the comparison as valid. 🙄
The iPhone pics and video were over saturated and slightly off color. In auto mode the pics did seem to be comparable sharpness wise but the Canon obviously out does the iPhone when you manually adjust it yourself. I think the Canon still wins here even in auto mode because the colors are more true.
Another thing to note is that the iPhone will automatically edit your picture while the r100 will not, I’m sure once you edit the picture it would look better than the iPhone.
Good video. I see some people miss the point. I use cameras, in fact I allways carry a camera with me. I shoot raw and process my pictures in Lightroom. I know phones overprocess the pictures (fake sharpness, fake saturation and fake bokeh) and I don't like it. But that's me, most people I know will never copy their pictures to a PC nor print them, they are just fine letting their phones process their images. The R100 will not improve their output in a meaningful way for them.
Doesn't a 10 year 100D (Rebel) with a nifty fifty still beat the latest iphone ?
I’ll be interested once the modding community make custom firmware for the R100 because that’ll probably fix the 4k with 60FPS
Doubt it'll happen anytime soon, canon locked their cameras down after magic lantern was released.
please make videos on Panasonic cameras... they are amazing..
How many camera's do you have!? :-D
You got to give it to Apple iPhone's for taking nice pictures. The video looks great on the 14 Pro too. The color reproduction and ease of just taking a camera out of your pocket, it's going to be hard to beat. Getting the better F1.8 lens on the R100 is the way to go for sure though. Seems a crime to use the kit lens. lol Really interesting to see how image quality is progressing from both phone and entry level camera's these days. Really awesome stuff.
I’m scared to count at this point haha. I’m amazed with how good phone cameras are getting, but I’m really excited to see what happens when cameras start to get all of the computational photography that phones have!
I think it's a matrer of purpose. While smartphones goal is to take a photo and immediately share it to social media. No time waste editing. Cammeras on the other hand, aren't thought to share images right away. So they don't put so much effotr on embedded colour procesing. It would be much fair to take the images to a processing software amd trying to "work" them.
Mkbhd did an entite review using the iPhone and the quality looked dope to me. Seaech Prius 2023 MKBHd 😊
Yall should now realized phones have lense but they also have built in filters so thats why they look good but a camera is better because it can shoot raw photos natural instead of filters on a phone and he didn’t edit the photos another reason why
How much is an iPhone?
I’m sorry broski but u need to know how to operate the camera because ngl I could retake all photos better with a 2000D, the camera is definitely better than the phone
Who uses auto mode with a dedicated camera on their hand? I never do that, I try to use the full potential of my camera and cameras will always beat smartphone photos if you use it right. Smartphone technology is not yet there to beat a camera.
Let alone the cameras, that dude at the pic in minute 3:06 looks mad af 😂
Just looks like your saturation is turned up on your pricey phone. Didn't compare movement & low light? Phone has a tiny sensor.
Bro im not judging you but it seems you can't set the best settings on your camera cause the photos with r100 are look like the photos of samsung galaxy a10 then a mirrorless camera honestly or you don't know anyting about camera raw filter
There's a reason Android based OSes and iOS/iPadOS default camera programs have such heavy post-processing (use Open Camera for unprocessed out-of-camera image and video). Even if dynamic range was improved past 2005, lens diffraction and ISO performance is a physical limitation due to basic physics. If you think images and video from phone cameras are anything but terrible to it'll do... Dunning-Kruger effect. No, 1-inch sensors aren't good enough and never were in the first place regardless of whether it's in a point and shoot, DigiCam, phone or a bridge camera.
The kit is on sale for 349€, so I had to pull the trigger on it. Wouldn't call it a good camera, but I just want to get something better than a smartphone with the ability to change lenses
What any dedicated camera can do and no smartphone camera can (there may be more, but this list is just off the top of my head):
- Fast action shots (sport, wildlife, bird-in-flight)
- Remote external flashes (professional portrait, real estate)
- Tilt/shift
Saying that most people would be very happy with their latest iPhone camera as it is more than good enough for family and travel photos.
Please at least is Chinese smartphone, iphone so worst.
iPhone has stopped improving since the 5 or 6 generation
Ever heard of LOG pics and color grading!? Kid Cameras are meant for proffessional stuff with proffessional grading as the next step.
i just think that the dynamic range on the iphones now since the iphone 11s are just questioning if having a dedicated camera is necessary these days for some people.
Hi boy. Just use yr jeronimo for that.
Smartphone brands are increasing their sensor size day by day😂..they know only ai will not help,physics also important.
You should know you cant really compare a phone camera with a real camera theres to much processing from the phone this video is misleading you can make the ohotos look like the iphone in lightroom
Iphones extreme hdr and over sharpening looks terrible next to canons images. Image quality still miles ahead with canon if you care about it.
finally! all the other videos compare the iPhone to like a 10k camera, I wanna see something that's realistic for me :P
3:40 but really? I thought iPhone looked meh worse a lot of the time. it's so overshapened and fake and lacks detail in some ways?
the color is also almost always more pink/red or greenish
video how ever is pure trash on the r100 IMO
In a camera like this it’s the lens not the camera
3:22 it seems iPhone 14 pictures are best result but what about my new purchase this R100 ???
❤️❤️❤️
Even my old 7d with my 70-200 f4 would beat any iPhone anytime. I have thrown the shit on mud, water, Rain, weddings, anything you can think of. 😂
I have bought yesterday EOS R 100 after watching this iPhone 14 picture comparison I’m feeling bad
Should I return it ???
No, keep it and learn to use it, try different lenses
Bruh just raise levels on photoshop and r100 are equally same as iPhone 😂
R10 wins, iphone oversharp + none of these photos are edited
How could you even think of comparing a shitphone camera with a Literal CAMERA
There are 300$ cameras, maybe even 10 years old. And iPhone does way better than them. Doesn’t mean if its called a camera it’s automatically better
@@Dogma100 making a person yellow doesn't mean doing way better
Well, to me it looks like the shitphone camera won both in video and photo. Maybe if you know photoshop and have couple of hours to edit your camera photos it's worth it, otherwise, the raw images are simply more pleasant from the iPhone.
😂 Gotta laugh. Dogma, dude, tx for that, I needed a good laugh. A guy once made the mistake of telling me his Iphone can take better photos than my 12mp Nikon D300s. I slapped on my 70-200 & we compared images. It wasn't even close. So yeah, you tell yourself your Iphone is better than my old camera, just because Apple tells you it is. 😂
The iphone tiny sensor compressed shitty photos are not comparable to a real camera. I have one.
Wow, the pictures of the Canon R100 are drastically WORSE. It's a different class! Gotta hand it to Apple.
Ok, let's see how those images print at A0. It's one thing to look at images on a screen, but it's a different story when you go to print. This is why I always laugh at these pointless comparisons.
3:35 No. That just isn't true and it is a myth that is spread all over TH-cam and in people's heads. I am the last one to defend Canon because I hate them for their politics on artificial feature restriction, but in this case I can't do anything else.
The iPhone isn't "sharper", it is just more processed. Shoot a real RAW with it (not ProRAW) and you will see that huge difference. Often it is processed so heavily that colours and detail really suffer. See the grass in your photos at 3:34. That's not even close, no grass that you can find outdoors will look like on the iPhone. People who don't see this have to make an appointment at their local doctor's.
Very smart that you excluded any editing from the test setup in the beginning because by that, you eliminate the whole advantage of having a real camera. And that is not even referred to postprocessing and RAW in any way, I just have in mind that you can select once before starting how you want your camera to process the images - a big advantage you don't have with your iPhone where you have to take what you get, something between okayish and nightmare. You can set any camera to sharpen more or add saturation and contrast by very simple sliders. Then go and shoot. No witchcraft in it, but million miles better than the restrictive approach that iOS still delivers.
R100 win's big in the right hands. The iphone uses Ai to process image.
Lol, the iphone pictures look so un natural. But you do you.
in my opinion (of course after seeing a video comparing photos taken by different phones) google phones take the best photos and apple was only tenth on that list. 😂
Buying a camera has nothing to do with the camera - the actual investment is in lenses. The only brands I would invest in lenses in 2023 is Sony and Nikon. Sony if you want a wide selection of potential camera options to fit a variety of specific needs and Nikon if you want a brand playing a technologically spectacular game of catchup (and actually surpassing Sony) in many ways.
I agree with the glass comment, but don't disregard Canon RF glass.
the iphone images look horrible, over saturated, horrible sharpening
the r100 looked natural and realistic. and thats on auto
Looks like someone has bought Canon R100 😂
Let them believe their Iphone is better. 😂
Stop comparing real cameras with phone cameras please.
Apple looks so artificial
Phones will never pass cameras in detail .
I got an old Panasonic SZ10 camera. I like its rendering in broad daylight but my Samsung S20 FE gets far more detail, accurate white balance, and by night its usability without a tripod to even handheld night shots is just magic. Cellphones indeed destroyed the market of compact cameras, and although an aps-c camera can get more detail, with the smaller sensor of cellphones you get more in focus, while with big sensor cameras you have to resort to f8 or f11, tripod, timer, hyperfocal, and praying for no wind, and even so not everything will be in focus except if you use tilt-shift lenses.
@@ReinoldFZright now I'm looking at a nightscape taken on my old Nikon D7000 with an 18-105 kit lens. It was a windy evening & yet the details are crisp & clear on an A1 size print. You see, it's one thing to look at something on a screen. It's quite another once it's printed.
R50 is best don't buy r100
No sense.
You compare plumbs with nuts.
iPhone is better. Entry level SLR/Mirrorless Camera is loser.
Never thought I would need to watch such videos comparing a Smartphone with a Camera🫠😗😂
Bruh 14 pro… okay thx for info 🫨
I’ll be interested once the modding community make custom firmware for the R100 because that’ll probably fix the 4k with 60FPS