Patek Philippe Aquanaut Chronograph 5968A-001 Patek Philippe Watch Review

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ก.ย. 2024
  • Contact Team Mosso for pricing and availability.
    Email: tmosso@thewatchbox.com
    Shop all Patek Philippe watches: www.thewatchbo...
    SKU: 4929790
    The Patek Philippe Aquanaut Chronograph 5968A-001 is encased in 42.2mm of stainless steel surrounding a black embossed dial on a tropical rubber strap. Features of this Patek Philippe Aquanaut Chronograph include hours, minutes, small seconds, date and flyback chronograph. This Patek Philippe watch also measures 12mm in thickness and 50mm from lug-to-lug.
    For complete details, watch the full Patek Philippe Aquanaut Chronograph review.
    Please subscribe to our channel: www.youtube.co...
    WatchBox is now The 1916 Company. Learn more: www.the1916com...
    See our inventory, along with news and content from across the industry on our app: onelink.to/watc...

ความคิดเห็น • 22

  • @BenTramer
    @BenTramer 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    The inability to set the date at the crown is not acceptable. Tim did a great job of explaining the "why" behind it but I expect more from Patek.

    • @12345Sui
      @12345Sui 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ridiculous indeed. A „Patek“ 😉

    • @highnrising
      @highnrising 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You can advance the date via the crown--You just can't "quick-set" it that way.

    • @BenTramer
      @BenTramer 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@highnrising Got it. Thank you.

  • @thatmexicanguy2989
    @thatmexicanguy2989 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Wore one of these and when I took a closer look at the details on the dial the finishing was terrible in certain places 😂 the hands have uneven and flaky colours to them and rough edges…

  • @Nefville
    @Nefville 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The $130k this watch costs can get you so much more. Even within Patek Phillipe. Of course after you do shell out the $130k the orange strap that everyone wants on this costs $5,000+. No buckle. I don't get it but hey whatever makes people happy.

  • @lbco5229
    @lbco5229 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    ‘The 1916 Company.’ Is it too late to go back to the well known and descriptive ‘WatchBox?’

    • @BenTramer
      @BenTramer 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      1916 is a narcissistic and nostalgic change in my eyes.

    • @davidr2802
      @davidr2802 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@BenTramer Because you know most of their clients?

    • @BenTramer
      @BenTramer 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@davidr2802 fixed

    • @Nefville
      @Nefville 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@davidr2802 I'm curious what's going on in your life that makes you so miserable that you are always being nasty to people in the comments here. That's not normal, especially in a hobby where people are here to find enjoyment, not whatever negativity you're peddling.

    • @fmcdomer
      @fmcdomer 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      i think someone came in and invested in watchbox
      now they are the 1916 company

  • @tthrl
    @tthrl 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Could've inverted the colours on the date disc.

  • @onurkarli82
    @onurkarli82 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I loved it.

  • @JimJones762x39
    @JimJones762x39 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Non hacking is unforgivable in this day and age

  • @ozzy1154
    @ozzy1154 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The AQUAnaut… a luxury water resistant sports piece with screw down crown. The AQUAnaut chronograph… same screw down crown, but with virtually no water resistance?? Huh?? What a joke

  • @nickfilopoulos7428
    @nickfilopoulos7428 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Sorry I see $ 50 dollars watch looking much better then the one you are showing plus it has the 20 cents ugly rubber strap,

  • @vika0194
    @vika0194 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    One of their worst looking watches. Looks like it would cost less than $100.

  • @adadadatt
    @adadadatt 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Horrendous waste of good horology funds