. جزاكم الله خيرا for spreading this message, but regrettably, most people claiming to be muslim are blindly following their desires and and do not free themselves from shirk and its people, but we have to keep distinguishing truth from falsehood. Some naseehah, as you rightfully mentioned about that picture poster, but not only that, all forms of tasweer of animate souls are impermissible, including digital, photography and video making, as all these types fall under the hadeeth كل مصور في النار يجعل له بكل صورة صورها نفس يعذب بها في جهنم The word كل "every" is broad and general, and in order to allow any type of picture, there must be a clear exception, which there isnt, all those who allow one type of tasweer over the other base this on opinions and blindly following them over the clear evidences prohibiting it. It is regrettable that the ummah has been trialed by this great munkar, to the point that some scholars have fallen into allowing this, but we follow the evidences over the people. So we must be careful not to fall under this hadeeth, even if we are doing dawah or some other good. When these images appear on devices or any form of media, we must try to blur out or cover them. الله يبارك فيكم
May Allah reward you for the advice brother. I thought Video was allowed as its a moving motion and capturing the moment (Many schoars did allow video - Ibn Baz, Ibn uthaymeen etc and many salafi schoars and MJHdeen.
@thedawahvan baarakallaahu feekum, it was reported that shaikh ibn uthaimeen retracted his opinion allowing it shortly before he passed away accirding to a student of his, may Allaah have mercy on he shaikh. Shaikh ibn baz rahimahullaah and others also changed their opinions either for or against it. However, when we are faced with ikhtilaf, we go back to the evidences. As for videos, some scholars have said they are worse since they are many separate, individual still photos put together and are even more realistic when that is done. Allaah knows best, and may He show us the truth as truth and to follow it, and baatil as baatil and to stay away from it
So the question here is why do you live in a democracy and take advantage of all it offers. Hypocrisy comes to mind, or ignorance, or both, maybe Wahhabism, maybe you should live in a theocracy, maybe just reset your thinking! tell me when you're unwell you use secular medicine hospitals, doctors? Reverting back to the middle ages is why this belief system is anachronistic at best, and dangerous at worst. Please comment but keep it civil!
Are you Muslim or not? Just so i know how to answer you. If you are Muslim you didn't provide one evidence from quran or sunnah for shirk in hakimeeyah. If you not Muslim, we pay our taxes and we are entitled to everything we get. Living under a democracy does not mean we have to participate in its elections. Even in democracy law people are excluded from voting due to religious reasons, some Christians and Jews don't vote in a democracy also due to religious reasons.
@@thedawahvan The issue is one of unity and togetherness, I understand that the view of voting to some Muslims as well as other ideas in the Koran and hadith are viewed as not acceptable, My overall position is that change be, that Islamic reform of certain beliefs as some brothers believe can only be a positive in acceptance of Islam in the wider community. I respect your position in relation to man made laws, but change in a political sense can be achieved through voting (although I at times doubt it)
May Allah reward you i totally understand your position. The argument i got from the Scholars is that, we can only bring victory through what is allowed in the quran and sunnah. Even though other ways might seem good as well, but Islam is superior, so to refer to anything else is less superior and waste of time. Especially when shirk is involved, shrik is not allowed no matter how great the results might seem. Also we have seen in the last few decades no benefits has came from democracy. Is a lie.
I agree with you for not voting for muslims in the western political non muslim system but I disagree with you for making the rejection excuse is DEMOCRACY ...
Democracy, or majority rule by men casting votes, is kufr (disbelief) Allaah azza wa jalla said, إِنِ الْحُكْمُ إِلَّا لِلَّهِ ۚ أَمَرَ أَلَّا تَعْبُدُوا إِلَّا إِيَّاهُ ۚ ذَٰلِكَ الدِّينُ الْقَيِّمُ وَلَٰكِنَّ أَكْثَرَ النَّاسِ لَا يَعْلَمُونَ Indeed, the hukm ( ruling, command, judgement) is for none but Allah. He has commanded that you worship none but Him (i.e. His Monotheism), that is the (true) straight religion, but most men know not. 12:40 إِنِ الْحُكْمُ إِلَّا لِلَّهِ عَلَيْهِ تَوَكَّلْتُ وَعَلَيْهِ فَلْيَتَوَكَّلِ الْمُتَوَكِّلُونَ Verily! The hukm (decision, ruling, command) rests only with Allah. In Him, I put my trust and let all those that trust, put their trust in Him." 12:68 These aayaat prove that Allaah Almighty is the One with sovereign authority to legislate, not people. We must follow His legislation, not make up our own laws. This is a form of worship to Him. Disobeying His legislation is sinning and disobedience, and if one believes it is permissible to disobey or disregard His legislation or replace it with another legislation, this is disbelief. So if we do try to participate in voting, parliament, and democracy, it is a form of shirk (polytheism), as one is aiding those trying to be a rival to Allaah azza wa jall. Democracy in different forms was practiced before and during the time of the prophet sallalaahu alayhi Wasallam and the sahabah, and it was rejected as a form of government by them as well. So we must call the people to tawheed and leaving off shirk, and sunnah and leaving off innovations.
@@nomadbiker4040 My bro , you went so far away by interpreting those verses unfortunately ... Those verses are stating that the constitution rule(s) are only by Allah so what Allah have ruled then it should be followed perfectly... The problem of western democracy is in 2 parts ; #1 , the base voters will elect the head which is not within Islamic government system but only the ( Shorah ) which the top head leaders of muslims will elect their prince among them only !... #2 , The western democracy system is forcing both participant sides to follow the winner in the election which is in-line with Islamic system but the problem is if the winner is not a muslim , what will happen now ?1... Muslims are ordered not to follow but only muslim leaders and this is the main rejection excuse for muslims not to participate in the voting unless they are 100% that a muslim guy will win so to follow and this is very rare to happen in the west since muslims are very minority... Got it now bro ?!...
@ahmedalshalchi no, it does not matter if it is a muslim or non muslim country, all types of democracy is kufr, and the proofs are clearly in those aayaat. As far as shora or shura, this is not the same as democracy, as the shura (consultation) does not go against the sharee'ah, and the shura members are muslims and knowledgeable, and the leader can still go against their recommendations or advice afterwards, where in democracy, the total opposite happens, the voters are the masses of people, the sinner (taalih) is equal by vote to the righteous (saalih,) and they help the system change the laws which go against islam. So for instance, even if muslims were in the lands of disbelief and a candidate who claims to be a muslim runs for office and say i will help islam and i will ban alcohol and drugs etc, this is still shirk, because Allaah azza wa jall Only has the authority to say what is halal ana haram, so now these people unjustly grant themselves this authority either by voting for the law in sonething already legislated by Allaah, the Sovereign Legislator, or voting for candidates who will change the laws, so this is setting themselves up as rivals to Allaah ta'ala. See the following hadeeth: The Messenger of Allah recited this Ayah; ﴿ ٱتَّخَذُوٓاْ أَحۡبَارَهُمۡ وَرُهۡبَـٰنَهُمۡ أَرۡبَابً۬ا مِّن دُونِ ٱللَّهِ ﴾ (9:31) (They took their rabbis and their monks to be their lords besides Allah). `Adi commented, "I said, `They did not worship them.''' The Prophet said, « بَلَى إِنَّهُمْ حَرَّمُوا عَلَيْهِمُ الْحَلَالَ وَأَحَلُّوا لَهُمُ الْحَرَامَ فَاتَّبَعُوهُمْ فَذَلِكَ عِبَادَتُهُمْ إِيَّاهُم » (Of course they did. They (rabbis and monks) prohibited the allowed for them (Christians and Jews) and allowed the prohibited, and they obeyed them. This is how they worshipped them.) So no to democracy, no matter what its disguised to look like. We ask Allaah azza wa jalla for safety
I'm a simple man. I see abu ousayd, i like.
Mashallah. May Allah reward you brother for the support :-)
Me too 💯
.
جزاكم الله خيرا
for spreading this message, but regrettably, most people claiming to be muslim are blindly following their desires and and do not free themselves from shirk and its people, but we have to keep distinguishing truth from falsehood.
Some naseehah, as you rightfully mentioned about that picture poster, but not only that, all forms of tasweer of animate souls are impermissible, including digital, photography and video making, as all these types fall under the hadeeth
كل مصور في النار يجعل له بكل صورة صورها نفس يعذب بها في جهنم
The word كل "every" is broad and general, and in order to allow any type of picture, there must be a clear exception, which there isnt, all those who allow one type of tasweer over the other base this on opinions and blindly following them over the clear evidences prohibiting it. It is regrettable that the ummah has been trialed by this great munkar, to the point that some scholars have fallen into allowing this, but we follow the evidences over the people. So we must be careful not to fall under this hadeeth, even if we are doing dawah or some other good. When these images appear on devices or any form of media, we must try to blur out or cover them.
الله يبارك فيكم
May Allah reward you for the advice brother. I thought Video was allowed as its a moving motion and capturing the moment (Many schoars did allow video - Ibn Baz, Ibn uthaymeen etc and many salafi schoars and MJHdeen.
@thedawahvan baarakallaahu feekum, it was reported that shaikh ibn uthaimeen retracted his opinion allowing it shortly before he passed away accirding to a student of his, may Allaah have mercy on he shaikh. Shaikh ibn baz rahimahullaah and others also changed their opinions either for or against it. However, when we are faced with ikhtilaf, we go back to the evidences. As for videos, some scholars have said they are worse since they are many separate, individual still photos put together and are even more realistic when that is done. Allaah knows best, and may He show us the truth as truth and to follow it, and baatil as baatil and to stay away from it
May Allah bless the dawah , the van & the man
Never give up
Amin. May Allah reward you Uncle for your kind support. :-)
Never give up ignorance and backward revisionist thought, wow I recommend Richard Dawkins to help with your mental health illness
@@DG5466 I recommend the aboriginal black pudding 3 times a week for 2 month with sprinkle of democracy & then come back to assess your condition
@@almowahideen8949 Wow talk about Islam and racism or is that Islam and intolerance. Inshallah
Salam alikum akhi where can we get these pamphlets from? Me and a friend were looking for something like this
You can pick up from our centre in Bankstown or we can send you the pdf
@@thedawahvan I was to looking to get physical copies I’m from Michigan though is there a way I can order them online or something
No sorry, we have physical copies but only within Australia
We can sent you the pdf and maybe you can print it out yourself.
@@thedawahvan okay send it to me please and thank you. How do you want to send it email or what?
yes. plesae messege us on facebook dawahvan and sent me your email
So the question here is why do you live in a democracy and take advantage of all it offers. Hypocrisy comes to mind, or ignorance, or both, maybe Wahhabism, maybe you should live in a theocracy, maybe just reset your thinking! tell me when you're unwell you use secular medicine hospitals, doctors? Reverting back to the middle ages is why this belief system is anachronistic at best, and dangerous at worst. Please comment but keep it civil!
Are you Muslim or not?
Just so i know how to answer you.
If you are Muslim you didn't provide one evidence from quran or sunnah for shirk in hakimeeyah.
If you not Muslim, we pay our taxes and we are entitled to everything we get. Living under a democracy does not mean we have to participate in its elections.
Even in democracy law people are excluded from voting due to religious reasons, some Christians and Jews don't vote in a democracy also due to religious reasons.
@@thedawahvan The issue is one of unity and togetherness, I understand that the view of voting to some Muslims as well as other ideas in the Koran and hadith are viewed as not acceptable, My overall position is that change be, that Islamic reform of certain beliefs as some brothers believe can only be a positive in acceptance of Islam in the wider community. I respect your position in relation to man made laws, but change in a political sense can be achieved through voting (although I at times doubt it)
May Allah reward you i totally understand your position.
The argument i got from the Scholars is that, we can only bring victory through what is allowed in the quran and sunnah. Even though other ways might seem good as well, but Islam is superior, so to refer to anything else is less superior and waste of time. Especially when shirk is involved, shrik is not allowed no matter how great the results might seem. Also we have seen in the last few decades no benefits has came from democracy. Is a lie.
@@thedawahvan Yes I tend to agree with you on the issue of democracy and capitalism.
I agree with you for not voting for muslims in the western political non muslim system but I disagree with you for making the rejection excuse is DEMOCRACY ...
elaborate
Democracy, or majority rule by men casting votes, is kufr (disbelief)
Allaah azza wa jalla said,
إِنِ الْحُكْمُ إِلَّا لِلَّهِ ۚ أَمَرَ أَلَّا تَعْبُدُوا إِلَّا إِيَّاهُ ۚ ذَٰلِكَ الدِّينُ الْقَيِّمُ وَلَٰكِنَّ أَكْثَرَ النَّاسِ لَا يَعْلَمُونَ
Indeed, the hukm ( ruling, command, judgement) is for none but Allah. He has commanded that you worship none but Him (i.e. His Monotheism), that is the (true) straight religion, but most men know not. 12:40
إِنِ الْحُكْمُ إِلَّا لِلَّهِ عَلَيْهِ تَوَكَّلْتُ وَعَلَيْهِ فَلْيَتَوَكَّلِ الْمُتَوَكِّلُونَ
Verily! The hukm (decision, ruling, command) rests only with Allah. In Him, I put my trust and let all those that trust, put their trust in Him." 12:68
These aayaat prove that Allaah Almighty is the One with sovereign authority to legislate, not people. We must follow His legislation, not make up our own laws. This is a form of worship to Him. Disobeying His legislation is sinning and disobedience, and if one believes it is permissible to disobey or disregard His legislation or replace it with another legislation, this is disbelief. So if we do try to participate in voting, parliament, and democracy, it is a form of shirk (polytheism), as one is aiding those trying to be a rival to Allaah azza wa jall.
Democracy in different forms was practiced before and during the time of the prophet sallalaahu alayhi Wasallam and the sahabah, and it was rejected as a form of government by them as well. So we must call the people to tawheed and leaving off shirk, and sunnah and leaving off innovations.
@@nomadbiker4040 My bro , you went so far away by interpreting those verses unfortunately ...
Those verses are stating that the constitution rule(s) are only by Allah so what Allah have ruled then it should be followed perfectly...
The problem of western democracy is in 2 parts ;
#1 , the base voters will elect the head which is not within Islamic government system but only the ( Shorah ) which the top head leaders of muslims will elect their prince among them only !...
#2 , The western democracy system is forcing both participant sides to follow the winner in the election which is in-line with Islamic system but the problem is if the winner is not a muslim , what will happen now ?1... Muslims are ordered not to follow but only muslim leaders and this is the main rejection excuse for muslims not to participate in the voting unless they are 100% that a muslim guy will win so to follow and this is very rare to happen in the west since muslims are very minority...
Got it now bro ?!...
@@ammar6937 I have answered you too with @nomadbiker4040 , just read below replies ... thank you ...
@ahmedalshalchi no, it does not matter if it is a muslim or non muslim country, all types of democracy is kufr, and the proofs are clearly in those aayaat. As far as shora or shura, this is not the same as democracy, as the shura (consultation) does not go against the sharee'ah, and the shura members are muslims and knowledgeable, and the leader can still go against their recommendations or advice afterwards, where in democracy, the total opposite happens, the voters are the masses of people, the sinner (taalih) is equal by vote to the righteous (saalih,) and they help the system change the laws which go against islam. So for instance, even if muslims were in the lands of disbelief and a candidate who claims to be a muslim runs for office and say i will help islam and i will ban alcohol and drugs etc, this is still shirk, because Allaah azza wa jall Only has the authority to say what is halal ana haram, so now these people unjustly grant themselves this authority either by voting for the law in sonething already legislated by Allaah, the Sovereign Legislator, or voting for candidates who will change the laws, so this is setting themselves up as rivals to Allaah ta'ala.
See the following hadeeth:
The Messenger of Allah recited this Ayah;
﴿ ٱتَّخَذُوٓاْ أَحۡبَارَهُمۡ وَرُهۡبَـٰنَهُمۡ أَرۡبَابً۬ا مِّن دُونِ ٱللَّهِ ﴾
(9:31)
(They took their rabbis and their monks to be their lords besides Allah). `Adi commented, "I said, `They did not worship them.''' The Prophet said,
« بَلَى إِنَّهُمْ حَرَّمُوا عَلَيْهِمُ الْحَلَالَ وَأَحَلُّوا لَهُمُ الْحَرَامَ فَاتَّبَعُوهُمْ فَذَلِكَ عِبَادَتُهُمْ إِيَّاهُم »
(Of course they did. They (rabbis and monks) prohibited the allowed for them (Christians and Jews) and allowed the prohibited, and they obeyed them. This is how they worshipped them.)
So no to democracy, no matter what its disguised to look like.
We ask Allaah azza wa jalla for safety