Wonderful explanation. I am very much thankful to you Sir, for giving me the very concept of structural dynamics and helping to understand the design of structure for earthquake forces.
hello sir thank you so much for the explanation and how wonderful it is , i had one note that you may double check it for me please which is the participation factor related to the P3 where my results gives something different than whats shown so i hope you can correct me if im mistaken with a clear calculations for it
Thanks sir, your explanation techniques are wonderful. My question is, is there any printing mistake in finding out time period form Eigen Values?? (Lambda1)
Wonderful explanation. I am very much thankful to you Sir, for giving me the very concept of structural dynamics and helping to understand the design of structure for earthquake forces.
Its shame that this channel have only 6k subscribers
thank you sir
explained very well
hello sir
thank you so much for the explanation and how wonderful it is , i had one note that you may double check it for me please which is the participation factor related to the P3 where my results gives something different than whats shown so i hope you can correct me if im mistaken with a clear calculations for it
Thanks sir, your explanation techniques are wonderful.
My question is, is there any printing mistake in finding out time period form Eigen Values?? (Lambda1)
Dear Hashmi,
They are correct. You may want to look at the calculation of the same. th-cam.com/video/ZGgSyVmEA0E/w-d-xo.html
regards,
SD Team
How you found SD from given time period?
where is the response spectrum? its not available?
if there were infill walls in the example, then we can assume them as diagonals and change the stiffness matriix?
Yeah
thank ypu sir
sd value from ???
Response spectra of particular GM.
regards,
SD Team
@@structuraldynamics466 which GM....response spectrum isn't given right?
at the end...U3=3.090 m ??!!
You are correct those are in 'cm'.
regards,
SD Team
Ref. 16.03 instance
Participation factor 1.22 kaise aa gaya sir ji
Please do manual calculation to verify it.
regards,
SD Team
@@structuraldynamics466 sir I did manual calculation, I think its not 1.22
👍🏻