Certainly, the guests are in a difficult situation, and San Francisco's policies have worsened the rental housing situation. However, it is likely that the guests themselves were initially seeking a bargain and purchased a property with existing tenants (probably acquired at a significantly lower price through lowball offers, perhaps at least $200,000 below market value). That's why they were willing to settle for $50,000 to $80,000 as a starting point. This indicates that "problematic properties with tenants" should never be bought or considered. If you intend to rent out a property, it's better to target either international students or young professionals working downtown. It's preferable to have tenants for a few years, until their visas expire or they purchase their own homes, and then find new tenants. It's crucial not to randomly select tenants and expect them to rent from you for a lifetime, especially families with children who have legal status. Such families are looking to stay indefinitely, and that should be avoided.
This indicates that" problematic properties with tenants" should never be bought or considered.Interesting video your way of expressing and intonation is amazing.
It's a poignant reminder of the complexities and struggles that can arise in the rental market, and the importance of fair and equitable regulations for both landlords and tenants.
It's preferable to have tenants for a few years, until their visas expire or they purchase their own homes, and then find new tenants. It's crucial not to randomly select tenants and expect them to rent from you for a lifetime, especially families with children who have legal status. Such families are looking to stay indefinitely, and that should be avoided.
Your friend was asking for trouble. Back in 2010, the owner of an house that I was interested in was willing to lower the price by $150k. I spoke to a lawyer and she said it would take at least $150k to get rid of the tenant with two old folks who had not been paying rent and electric bills for months, and she talked us out of the "deal".
I think the previous owner might have offered him a "huge bargain" and he thought it was easy to get rid of the tenant in SF. I experienced it before, and my lawyer talked us out of the deal(It was a $150k bargain for a $700k house back in 2010).
回答一些视频里面没讲的问题：
1. 房客怎么被赶走了？ 房客去年主动和房东和解要求今年这个月搬出去，要求是给搬迁费，因为旧金山让房客搬走需要给搬迁费. 当时房东和租客签了协议.
2. 当时为什么要租给他们？
房东买房子的时候这个租客已经在里面了，所以是上一届的房东租给他们的. 而且没有任何合约之类的，口头协议. 所以导致后来驱赶也格外困难.
3. 为什么不让律师在旧金山法庭递交驱赶案件？
有尝试过，没成功，法院偏向弱者，因为他们有老人什么的，法院保护他们怕他们成为流浪者.
哈哈哈😆
垃圾政府
垃圾法律
去尼玛 民主国家
假大空
Wow
加州的法律真是誇張了!!! 難怪會把美國最精華的城市搞成像第三世界國家似!!!
民主党干的事😂
租霸罪恶滔天！
趕租客太麻煩了，加州選租客一定要查信用，非常重要
查信用沒有記錄，除非贏了官司，房客需要付錢，少付一分都報催繳公司才会在信用報告有記錄
信用可以作假，需要仔细看
租客都能很容易的避免驱逐令的，
好恶劣，希望他们没好下场，还害老人家。真开眼了。法律真该改一下。
租客很坏的!
在有租客保护的国家和地区，带租客的房产买卖打折很厉害。以荷兰为例，带租客做房产估值要打15%的折扣起。有见过阿姆市区里半价挂售的例子。
所以买带租客的房子前要权衡好得失。
在上一篇“房子是你的，但你却无法赶走我这个租客”中，小唯带大家感受了美国法律对租客的偏袒所带来的无良租霸的风险，很多房东读者在后台留言说感
有租客的房子千万不能买，前房主很有可能就是因为租客的原因卖房子的，不过这样的房子也会便宜很多，就看你觉得值不值了。
知道有租客为什么还要买? 没有任何警惕性吗?
买房子的时候就不要买带租客的。或问问前房主租客的情况，还要让前房主多交5万块在你的escrow帐户，用于支付未来租客的遣散费。
是华人租客？不是涉及种族，只是看写的字是中文，如果是，想想华人“败类”更可怕。
对，华人租客
@@hikevin 真是大跌眼镜，华人很少做得这么绝的，一般租房子租给华人或东亚裔的比较省心，这家租客真是败类中的垃圾。
一定要查background
败类是不分种族的
Certainly, the guests are in a difficult situation, and San Francisco's policies have worsened the rental housing situation. However, it is likely that the guests themselves were initially seeking a bargain and purchased a property with existing tenants (probably acquired at a significantly lower price through lowball offers, perhaps at least $200,000 below market value). That's why they were willing to settle for $50,000 to $80,000 as a starting point. This indicates that "problematic properties with tenants" should never be bought or considered. If you intend to rent out a property, it's better to target either international students or young professionals working downtown. It's preferable to have tenants for a few years, until their visas expire or they purchase their own homes, and then find new tenants. It's crucial not to randomly select tenants and expect them to rent from you for a lifetime, especially families with children who have legal status. Such families are looking to stay indefinitely, and that should be avoided.
应该打restraining order 这样多少方圆内不能靠近受保护的人 这样子他们就必须搬了 不搬 就是违反禁止令 就可以被逮捕
双方的律师都不是笨蛋，这么简单的办法能解决问题谁会等四年？
This indicates that" problematic properties with tenants" should never be bought or considered.Interesting video your way of expressing and intonation is amazing.
It's a poignant reminder of the complexities and struggles that can arise in the rental market, and the importance of fair and equitable regulations for both landlords and tenants.
旧金山的法律是保护罪犯的法律。 这是不对的
民主党干的好事，这个🐷党毁了加州
就这样，华人还是选民主党。真是匪夷所思！
现在华人之中也有租霸
@@Rosemary-uc6ws 多了去了，我法庭上看到华人租霸，东湾，年纪轻轻的小夫妻，还要求一再延期，等孩子生下来，猪狗不如的畜生。
Great content and discusses an important issue
Thanks, enjoyed watching
第一次聽到這麼惡劣的租客，真的是太誇張了
很多!特别是兰州
当然嘉宾很可怜，三藩的政策更有病，让租房更难。但是嘉宾一开始肯定也有贪便宜，低价买了本身有租客的房子（估计同一条街上low ball了至少20w刀买到的）。所以才愿意一开始就给5-8万来解决。说明这种“含租客的硬伤房“ 一定不能买、不能碰。买房之后，想出租 就要么租给国际学生、要么downtown工作的young professional。宁可出租几年，他们身份到期、或者人家自己买房了 换一个租客，也不能瞎找 去指望一户人租你一辈子，尤其不能租给带孩子开火做饭 一家都有身份的老华人家庭。这种家庭 他们就是冲着在那儿赖一辈子去的
我最近伦敦看房，前两天看到一个tenant in situ的房子，那个租客从2010年起就没付过房租。我只能说那个房主真的在做慈善。
或者软弱。
伦敦也有这样的吗？
买房子时可以让租客走的，没走是不是有新租住合同或者延续就的租住合同？
民主党是慷别人之慨
这些职业租霸团伙在纽约市已经有十几二十年的历史了，见惯不怪什么肤色的人都有
So fantastic and great content ❤
Thank you so much for such educational video, I learned so much.
你找的律師不行,這種情形你要找刑事的律師而不是房仲的律師，而且要找好的，律師好壞差很多。
十分對
大部分人欺软怕硬，房东太弱了！如果我是他爸，既然来日不多就拖他们一家点背！
租霸有政府撑腰，斗地主分田地就是加州现状
这样算下来不如不租，那点租金多的都去了。那如果租给留学生是一个好方案吗？
我有个问题 你给他断水断电是不合法的 但是utility company是可以断的 房东租房之前可不可以安装高能耗设备 一旦欠租就启动 一个月utility给他干到2000刀 然后他付不起被断水断电 只能自己离开
It's preferable to have tenants for a few years, until their visas expire or they purchase their own homes, and then find new tenants. It's crucial not to randomly select tenants and expect them to rent from you for a lifetime, especially families with children who have legal status. Such families are looking to stay indefinitely, and that should be avoided.
Great content and discusses an important issue 😁
香港都試52個月租金收唔到，因為租左比間有限公司
这种带租客的房子尽量别买。都是以前的房东不喜欢租客又轰不走才买的。
你这种行为就是助长租霸的嚣张气焰，可以按照法律规定给搬家费，法律之外的不给
your video is really beautiful ...and i enjoyed a lot of your presentation ..thanks for this
因該seller 叫他们走
In the closing escrow
真懷疑政府的作用？不是包容是縱容。
法官的薪水就永远有保证了！
房東是不是也有問題
你真有病
以提告rent control board?
For damaged?
旧金山带租客的房子就是这个结果哦，能赶走的话前房主早就赶走他们了，带租客的房子骨折也卖不掉的。
为什么不把租客的东西丢出去
投资有风险，靠出租房生活也有风险，美加法律不支持靠出租房赚钱，仍能出租房子的华人勇气可嘉，
看來在了。美加不宜當房東
I think this is a great video keep it up
Interesting content, your way of expressing and intonation is amazing and adding more spice to it
Nice content and discusses important discussion,well done keep it up I appreciate your efforts thanks for sharing this video ❤️❤️❤️.
太夸张啦，太恶心了，作为同时美国华人给他的这种做法感到羞耻
哇，你说给五万或者八九万，是美金还是人民币？
美国用美金
great video
Thank you for the video it's really educative I like it❤
You are delivering good lecture your way of talking is very nice
不是我地域歧视，可以透露下是国内哪个省的人吗？
Squatter 住进我在 Palo Alto 的房子， 这个 squatter 找免费 lawyers， 我用8个月才赶走
在德州，我房子两个月赶走
德州好像是共和党州
是华人租客？不是涉及种族，只是看写的字是中文，如果是，想想华人“败类”更可怕。
主持人一直说废话，房东最后如何解决都没说
难怪许多人都要逃离加州😓
建议付钱给一大堆毒虫去骚扰他，要不然就是找烂仔解决他好了。
太恐怖了
以往有日本代表被迫瘋而選擇用極端方法把全家做掉再算~😱😱
是要買insurance cover rental lawsuits
W ins company
It’s cover 100%, beside fire insurance.
As landlord.
Or umbrella coverage w 1M
Or 2M.
难怪都去外州买房
明知有房客在那屋里你应该要前房东清走租客才去买，不然就不买，但你还是坚持去买就是你自己的愚蠢。或者你买时前房东便宜些卖给你，你是贪便宜而买下，那是你自已自找苦吃。
Great content
好多案例讲加州赶租客居然还要付搬迁费？！什么奇葩操作
所谓同情弱者，保护弱者，避免让他们无家可归，然后让可怜的房东买单，而不是实行法案的政府买单.
左派政客提出的租客保護法案雖然都立意“良善”（其實他們都只是爲了選票），然而就像俗話所言：通往地獄的道路往往是由善意鋪成的。@@hikevin
整个人都不好了，这比恐怖电影恐怖一千倍😢
It's America . What can we expect 😅 . Money is everything for every single move . You have to pay rent or stay in street
為什麼不查信用？
买房的时候已经在里面了
@@hikevin 喔 是前房主的租客。那前房主可能就是因此才賣房
@@peterequations 也有可能的，这个没具体问.
如果这事在中国，是不是又可以抱怨村领导了？
华人偏袒败登太离谱
Fantastic 😍 and Great 👍 Content
你没说重点，你通过法院，向租霸索要租金，房屋损坏费，法院怎么回复你的？ 如果法院同意你了，对方拒绝支付，后面的房东都知道他是祖霸，那等待他的命运就是无家可归
通常D租霸唔会同屋主去上法庭的.
因会留下底的
@@kitchow5317 不去直接判负啊，照样有案底
太恐怖了，竟然有这么坏的人！
Your friend was asking for trouble. Back in 2010, the owner of an house that I was interested in was willing to lower the price by $150k. I spoke to a lawyer and she said it would take at least $150k to get rid of the tenant with two old folks who had not been paying rent and electric bills for months, and she talked us out of the "deal".
Great informative video for me.good contact
为什么恐吓，毁坏房屋 警察都不管呢？
每天都有人biubiubiu 警察都管不过来，你这种小事
堕落的城市案件太多。
So fantastic, i like it
I really like this video the atmosphere is very good
一刀子的事情，你用了4年。
One of the reasons why striped knitted pants have become so popular. Bully Ray gives insight into Christian s heel work on AEW Dynamite.
Interesting vedio.
贺锦丽就是旧金山出来的
Verry intersting.....
主持人一直说废话，房东最后如何解决都没说
去年某天房客自己找他要求给他们钱同意搬出了，我猜估计他们自己也要买房子了吧？ 出去之前可以再敲一笔
租給他們之前，不做背景調查嗎？ 不查他們的信用嗎？
华人出租房子很多人就一个口头协议，有时候甚至都没有一纸协议来保护彼此. 这个租客时当时买房子时已经在里面了.
你這說不對的，我是一個租客，你有錢別人沒有錢你賠錢就是
Nice
Wow! What an advice to desire to be❤
I love this.
裝變態色呸子樣？有用嗎？
中国人抄房也太夸张
Intersting video your way of expressing and intonation is amzing❤
Thanks for sharing
制造事故， 一枪下去
我觉得非常奇怪？你买房前没有看房子的吗？那里只有这个房子买？你几年损失了多少钱？我只能说你是为了拍视频在吹逼或你脑袋有问题？我买房子前也有旧租客，跟旧房东说，成交可以，旧租客要搬走，是不是恶租霸我不管，钱在自己身上的，我现在出租给十个人住，没有黑，白人，都是新来在搞身份。
I think the previous owner might have offered him a "huge bargain" and he thought it was easy to get rid of the tenant in SF. I experienced it before, and my lawyer talked us out of the deal(It was a $150k bargain for a $700k house back in 2010).
这租客还是华人😵
这个博主还在笑，你在笑别人的痛苦吗？
我想如果闹到这种程度，肯定不单单是一方面的原因啦
你真是有毛病
美國是我完全沒興趣的國家
那就不要看啊。
警察是干什么吃的
警察说是民事. 其实也在侧面照顾所谓“弱者”
@@hikevin实际效果在鼓励犯罪。