*Proof for logical/philosophical arguments in the Quran.* In the Qurʾān, Allah Taʿālā tells us: We shall show them Our signs in every region of the earth and in themselves, until it becomes clear to them that this is the Truth. [Sūra Fuṣṣilat 53] This method of logical deduction was the way of all the previous prophets and earlier scholars of this Umma. (See Sūras Hūd 28 and 32, Al-Anʿām 76 to 83, Al-Anbiyā 58, Al-Baqarah 258 and Al-Naḥl 125.) It is Allah’s command that we exercise our intellect in reflecting over His signs in order to repel any doubts that may arise in the mind. The science of ʿIlm al-Kalām seeks to achieve the same objective. A group of atheists once approached the great Imām, Abū Ḥanīfa with the intention of killing him. The Imām asked them what they would say about a person who claims that he has seen a ship laden with goods sailing on the sea transporting the goods from one shore to another. The goods are piled onto the ship automatically and are similarly off-loaded by themselves upon reaching their destination. The ship navigates the waves perfectly all by itself with no sailor to steer it. They replied that no sane human would accept such a nonsensical contention. Thereupon the Imām remarked: "Pity upon your intelligence. If a mere ship cannot sail smoothly without a sailor, how then can it be ever possible that this entire universe runs so perfectly without a controller?" Upon hearing this they were utterly embarrassed and immediately accepted Islam at the hands of the Imām. Someone once asked Imām Mālik to provide a proof of the existence of a Creator. The Imām indicated towards his face and observed that despite the face of man being so small, it consists of two eyes, a nose, two ears, a tongue, cheeks, lips and other parts. Notwithstanding this, no two persons’ facial features are identical. Likewise the voice, mannerisms, character and habits of every person is unique. This is proof enough that all of this is the work of a Supreme Creator.
Jazak Allahu khair for the work you done and keep doing for the ummah. You are to some degree under valued! May Allah grant you a long life with afiyah and a pious life.
I am a Sunni Ashari/Maturidi and I see no difference between you and me in Aqaid. I wonder how the pseudo-salafi critique react to your video ... ^ People like you with real knowledge are really appreciated. May Allah ta ala prolong your life and increase your knowledge in general and specifically in Islam. Keep up your good work. We love you for Allah ta ala.
You can tell he went to Nigeria! 😂 Big up to Hijab for repping my home land and going to Nigeria to give Dawah. May Allah continue to bless him and his family with goodness! Amin!
True, its that some ppl take ideas against Islam and call it common sense, like ppl who deny Allah's attributes and compare Allah to creation or assume comparison.
@matswessling6600 It's the duty of every sane and mature person to seek out the truth to the best of their capability by tapping into the numinous nature of our humanity and to make the use of reasoning to ask Allah for His guidance with sincerity in the heart.
I find many salafis as arrogant. For them everyone who disagrees with them is a deviant. I used to be influenced by salafis but this behaviour of many of the followers of "salaf" is very repulsive. So much bad feeling for brothers.
Agreed. I do agree with a lot of things which Salafis preach but at the end of the day, their take that anyone who disagrees with them is a deviant is really arrogant and just wrong on many levels.
Ibn Taymiya celebrated Mawlid, he is the reason why we muslim believe that the world is round and he is also the reason (mainly) why hashish is Haram. Because he did not like people who smoked it 🙄(that's actually the truth)🤣.
it’s called al-ghazali - he liked to say he was a deviant but LOVED USING many if his arguments for the oroof Allah (yes its Al Ghazali that masted the Kalam Cosmological Argument that we know today not ibn Sina)…….which many “salfists” call ghazali a deviant 😅 and its always taqlid which they are against because you can tell NONE of fhem DEF NEVER READ ANY OF HIS WORK
I really don't understand these neo salafis, they keep repeating the same nonsense but not willing to sit with mohammed hijab and discuss the issues. That shows their dishonesty.
I did read that book of ibn taimia long ago, Now i have a nostalgic feeling, to add the book is full of rational argument and philosophical responses, in that time i was reading a page more than three time to understand the idea, great book. Thanks akhi
@unknown no no I believe in the contingency argument. Lol. The concept of a God is a human construction. We have zero evidence otherwise. People believe in unicorns doesnt mean they exist. belief means nothing in reality. Reality is that a prophet named Mohamed was taken back to jannah on a flying horse and the moon was split in two seems very unlikely. Almost comical in this day and age to believe a God would be so sloppy with his message. Quran has no order and needs hadith after hadith to explain it. I mean what type of god operates in such a illogical fashion?
The hat looks great! It is used not only in Nigeria but the whole Sahel/Sahara. It is in Sudan, Chad, Niger Republic, Nigeria, Mali, Mauritania, etc. I think in the Nigerian local language of Hausa, they call it "Hula". Hausa is an Afro-Asiatic language just like Arabic, so they have no "P" in their language as well.
We have to agree with Ibn Taymiyyah who said "kalam sharpens the mind". Actually, it's directly observable in the example of brother Hijab When we exercise any science we can get wrong as human beings. It doesn't mean science is bad. I mean all kinds of science including religious ones; fiqh, tafsir, hadith et cetera. Exercising Kalam, Mantiq, or logic stimulates certain parts of the brain and causes the growth of neurons. I am sorry to those guys who denigrate the Aql/Intellect and the consequences of that are observable in them too
Imām Ibn Taymiyyah said: "And so let the knowledgeable believer reflect carefully on how this invented Kalām has divided the Ummah divided and sowed enmity and hatred in it." [Darʾ At-Taʿāruḍ (2/306)] You must understand. Just because something good goes forth from one thing it doesnt follow that the whole is good. are there asepcts which are quite beneficial in todays democracies? For sure. Does thaf make democracy itself good?
@@abumansaray7 did I say it’s a refutation of this video? Pay attention dear brother, I said it refutes the exact points mentioned in it, BarakAllahu feek.
@@abumansaray7 He is refutating Hijab and explaining the point of view of ibn Taymiyyah in the correct context. And I recommend you watch the video yourself instead of arguing with me about it.
MashaAllah. May Allah put barakah in your 'ilm. These pseudo salafis have a very shallow understanding of Deen. They'll pick and choose references to support their agenda and then hastily pass judgement on anyone who disagrees. If they just read the books they refer to, instead of regurgitating what their 'scholars' say, all will be solved
Ash-Shaafi'i said: "My judgment concerning Kalaam theologians is that they should be taken around the community and beaten with palm branches and slippers and it will be said to them: this is the punishment for leaving the Words of Allah and the words of the Messenger of Allah, sallallaahu 'alayhi wa sallam." Mohammed Hijab you are a disingenuous individual especially as you want to use Ibn Taymiyyah RH to back up your claims as some sort of authority but previously disregarded him and belittled him. You can't have your cake and eat it. Hijab you know what you’re doing is insincere and falsehood. The difference between ibn taymiyyah RH and people of your ilk is that he heard the arguments of the people of kalam and showed their error in their arguments l.e refuted their baatil and foolishness whilst you use kalam to prove Allahs existence and support your claims. That is not the same. Ibn taymiyyah RH never used kalam to prove Allahs existence or attributes. You are a liar and you should fear Allah swt. th-cam.com/video/10cvFb14IfY/w-d-xo.html
Again, a perfect example of cherry picking and misinterpretation to fit an agenda. And another example of regurgitation. Of course in any science there are those who transgress the limits. Even in the science of Hadith, there are those that lie. When we talk about 'ilmul kalaam we're referring to it's correct usage. Why assume the opposite? Just like when we refer to muhaddithoon, are we refering to those who lie about Ahadith? Imam Shafi'i is referring to the likes of the Mu'tazila etc. Not the scholars of ahlus sunnah who use it correctly. وكيف يكون كلام أهل السنة والجماعة مذموما عنده وقد تكلم فيه وناظر من ناظره وكشف عن تمويه من ألقىلى سمع بعض أصحابه من أهل الأهواء شيئا مما هم فيه? “And how could he [al-Shafi’i] consider the kalaam of Ahl al-Sunnah wal-Jama’a as criminal when he himself followed it, debating with those who debated [Kalaam] and the errors Uncovered doubts among some of his disciples?” (Manaaqibul Imam Shafi'i) This really just proves my point of having a very shallow understanding of Deen and hastily passing judgement...
Like how much calmer you're in this video. I think you're brilliant and in couple of years or so, will be one of the top scholars of Islam. Keep it up Hijab!
@@Radec913 Because that is what their scholars for dollsrs tell them to. They even brainwash them not to listen to anyone from the other side. They don't have any confidence on their approach. That is why they resort to threatening and outright extremism.
@@isaatturki8569 Asalām 'Alaykum. Barak Allāhu Fīk. You can read Al-Iqtidā' As-Sirātul Mustaqīm of ibn Taymīyyah (رحمه الله), there he has refuted them and has spoken ill of them. You can read the English version of which the PDF is available online if you can not read Arabic. He also a comprehensive treatise on the refutation of Mantiq (Logic), which is known as Ar-Rad 'Ala Mantiq if I'm not mistaken. As for his indulgence within philosophy, it was his studying the subject inorder for the achievement of the refutation. Similarly how a Muslim would study Christianity inorder to refute and call people towards Islām. That studying does not makes him a Christian.
I just wish both sides accept their different approaches and stop going back and forth. In my opinion both approaches are necessary. Different audiences.
@@Just_logic reconciliation is best. These guys like sajid imo dont get how important the work of muhammed hijab is for muslims who grew up in the west and have been going to school here and have been goong to university here. We get indoctrinated into the new age atheism from very early on and we dont even notice it. Muhammed hijab destroys that paradigm with his argumentation. I will be honest to say that i think without sapience institute and the dawah these guys give i maybe wouldve been an atheist now. But now, its inconceivable for me. Nobody can take my belief in allah away from me now anymore (except allah himself ofcourse).
The man who built the Titanic was asked, How safe would the Titanic be? With an Ironic Tone he said: "NOT EVEN GOD CAN SINK IT" & we all know what happened to the Titanic.. Tancredo Neves President of Brazil. During a campaign, he said he got 500,000 votes for his party, Not even God would remove him from Presidency. Sure he got the votes, but he got sick & died a day before being made President.. Cazuza Brazilian singer & poet. During a show, while smoking his cigarette, he puffed out some smoke into the air & said: "God that's for u". He died at the age of 32 of LUNG CANCER in a horrible manner.. Allah SWT says in Qur’an Al-Kareem "Do not walk proudly on the earth: your feet cannot cleave the earth nor are you as tall as the mountains". Surah Isra (17:37). Ya Allah don't take my soul away until you are happy with me: Ya Allah give me a death of a shaheed. Ya Allah let the last words of my life be the Shahadah. Ya Allah If I die in my sleep let My heart beat the Zikr of Allah. Oh Allah, the guider of the lost soul forgive the entire Muslim Ummah! Ya Allah Forgive my Parents, my Family, my Muslim Friends. Ameen Ya Rabb
I often try to understand the problem pseudosalafis have with philosophy and for most part I notice they make the claim that philosophy aside from using foreign words and explanations, it is difficult for people to understand and supposably Aqidah is simple and straightforward. This to me is very strange of a stance. The argument Hijab has several times mentioned is that even Ibn taymiyyah supported complex and detailed explanation because it is what some people find fulfilling. You see, the same can be said about any subject in Islamic sciences, laypeople wouldn't care about usulul Fiqhi or scrutiny details of analyzing Hadith and so forth because it is all difficult and complicated, they would want just the ruling or the Hadith. That doesn't make the sciences less true, necessary or profound. The same is with philosophy and rational exhaustion in abstract concepts. If pseudosalafis cannot fathom such issues, they better chill than going around making things Haram.
@@12HR818 shut up. People like you and cp are not worthy of anyone’s time. Grow up and start taking your salvation seriously. This is like asking hitler to share Judaism. Your manchild who talks behind a screen of anonymity is more than welcome to come to speakers corner or join an efdawah stream
Some wrote in the commentaries that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) invited atheists to Islam and that, therefore, scientific logic and philosophy are not necessary in calling to Islam. However, many of the people have confused former infidels with Darwinian atheists which are two different groups of infidels. Historically, from an Islamic perspective, there have always been (ideologically) two groups of people, believers and non-believers. Believers are those who obey Allah and His Messengers and this has been the case throughout history. There are many types of unbelievers, but they were divided into two groups. The first group of disbelievers are those who have not denied the existence of Allah but have opposed Allah and His Messengers by refusing obedience. The first of these is Iblis, the accursed Satan who became arrogant and refused Allah's command to to bow to Adam and thus became an unbeliever. All those who in any way reject obedience to Allah and His Messengers while at the same time affirming the existence of Allah are disbelievers. If they also fight against the truth, then the unbelievers are like a damn devil. The basis of this unbelief is the arrogance and envy that lead people and jinn to disobedience, rejection and ultimately to hostility towards believers. Another type of unbelievers are polytheists who believe in the existence of multiple gods. They are also divided into several types, but there are basically two. The first kind are those who believe that Allah exists and that He is the Creator and the main God but that there are gods beside Him, His partners who have a share in power and whom people worship expecting some benefit from them such as protection, provision or simply bringing them closer to Allah. This kind of unbelievers were Arabs in the time of the Prophet 'alaihis-salam'. The second type of polytheists are those who do not believe in Allah but believe in the existence of other gods such as the ancient Greek, Roman or Egyptian polytheists who had their own gods, completely independent of Allah.This group includes today's Hindus who do not believe in the existence of Allah but also believe in many other deities. Today, however, a new kind of unbelievers has emerged and they are atheists. Atheists are people who completely deny the existence of any kind of deity. They deny creationism and that man was created by creation but believe in the "accidental" or natural origin of life and its evolution from one cell to today's man. These people believe that the whole universe came into being out of nothing. This kind of unbelievers did not exist in the time of the Prophet 'alaihis-salam'. The approach to calling people to the right path depends on which group of unbelievers they belong to. It is not the same to call to the right path Jews, Christians, polytheists or atheists who deny the existence of God. There are separate arguments for each of these groups. Some need proof that the Quran is from Allah and that it is a revelation to follow. Some polytheists need proof of the absurdity of having multiple gods, while to many people today, the existence of God must be proved and that man was created by creation. These people demand three pieces of evidence. The first is that there is a God, second is that Allah is That God and that He deserves to be worshiped and the third is that Muhammad 'alaihis-salam' is the Messenger of Allah.
Hi- cool comment. As a former agnostic atheist, I have to weigh in here. The reality is atheists are not always as rational as they portray themselves to be. Maybe they started out sincere but it's often not the case for too long. If all they needed was a sound proof of God's existence and then logical deductions about who that God is and then prophets etc, alayhim asalaam, then I would see your point. However this is not how it works the majority of the time; their hearts are hardened by kufr and following their desires for so long and they are often dismissive when it comes to seeking the truth. My view on this would be that in dealing with new-age-atheists there are plenty of much stronger pieces of artillery we need to use before we even think about the contingency argument. As Mufti Muneer says, the cup needs to be emptied before clean water goes into it. They need to hear why the multiverse theory is not a valid scientific theory, why science is not a means to obtaining absolute truth, how skepticism is a contradictory standpoint when taken to its logical end and other issues with their thoughts. So in essence my view is that a very powerful thing to do is to simply learn their belief system ie all of their idols' claims to belittle the existence of a God and refute it by showing its internal consistencies. Once that is done, they should be exposed to the rational proofs of Islam such as the preservation of the religion, the many prophecies which have been proven, the moral and legislative consistency and perfection of the religion, and even statistical examples from past and present models of orthodox Islam which have shown to provide society with the best means of living in a society. I am not in a position to say that one should never use the contingency argument, however I do have to say I find the above approach much more enlightening and successful from my point of view. SalAllahu ala nabiyyina Muhammad
1 - Whoever says SubhanAllahi wa biHamdihi (Glory be to Allah and Praise Him) a hundred times during the day, his sins are wiped away, even if they are like the foam of the sea [Sahih al-Bukhari; #7:168, Sahih Muslim; #4:2071] 2 - whoever says SubhanAllahi wa biHamdihi, Subhan-Allahi 'l-`adheem (Glory be to Allah, and Praise, Glory be to Allah, the Supreme) Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) said: "Two words are light on the tongue, weigh heavily in the balance, they are loved by the Most Merciful One " [Sahih al-Bukhari; #7:67, Sahih Muslim, #4:2071]
Aslam alaikum Hijab! You are doing well, may Allah reward you abundantly. Amin I can see you have some information about Nigeria and that's great. I watched a TH-cam video "opposing views - Islam: The end of Europe and I was relieved in the way you gave a strong befitting analysis to same questions answered by Ayaan Hirsi. I watched the video actually not because of you but because of the misconception she gave in one TH-cam video I watched "Islam is a religion of peace" in which she opposed. Additionally, I am glad you did another analysis giving her fitting answer to some of her wrong claims.
Most of the Salafi Madkhalis of West London that I remember of 10 years ago have grown up and moved on. They're either completely of deen or have joined the mainstream Sunni Muslims. Shamsi and Jamal are the only ones still on that narrow worldview. Their followers typically fizzle out or grow up (you can't get much done in life obsessively hating on other people), while a very, very small handful cling to their narrow world view they end up becoming increasingly irrelevant and outright laughing stocks. Speakers corner is the only thing keeping Shamsi relevant!
The prophet never used greek philosophy in dawah so stop using it to impress people we're not here to impress we should directly refer to the Quran and Sunnah like all the companions did. Philosophy in dawah is not something of this deen.
*Difference between islam and christianity* *Jesus:* was sinless and said _"love your enemies"_ *The pedophet:* violated each and every commandment at least three times each to be sure and he said _"slaughter and enslave all the christians"_
He didn’t refute the use of logic only the presupposition of a philosophical world view but that’s nonsense and most Salafis believe Ibn Taymiyya had an axiomatic one
Ash-Shaafi'i said: "My judgment concerning Kalaam theologians is that they should be taken around the community and beaten with palm branches and slippers and it will be said to them: this is the punishment for leaving the Words of Allah and the words of the Messenger of Allah, sallallaahu 'alayhi wa sallam." Mohammed Hijab you are a disingenuous individual especially as you want to use Ibn Taymiyyah RH to back up your claims as some sort of authority but previously disregarded him and belittled him. You can't have your cake and eat it. Hijab you know what you’re doing is insincere and falsehood. The difference between ibn taymiyyah RH and people of your ilk is that he heard the arguments of the people of kalam and showed their error in their arguments l.e refuted their baatil and foolishness whilst you use kalam to prove Allahs existence and support your claims. That is not the same. Ibn taymiyyah RH never used kalam to prove Allahs existence or attributes. You are a liar and you should fear Allah swt. th-cam.com/video/10cvFb14IfY/w-d-xo.html
We do not need Ibn Taymiyyah to verify the permissibility of using rational arguements.we have a rich tradition of scholars who are ashari and maturidi like ibn hajar al asqallani,al baqillani,fakhar uddin ar razi,imam taftazani, imam alah uddin bukhari, imam bazdawi,imam nasafi,imam gazzali and so on.they were using quran, sunnah and logic in a balanced way to explain aqeedah.so called salafis can not just say that they are all deviant. They do not even read the quran carefully.Allah swt, he himself gave a lots of arguements and ispired us to think, to understand, so that we can know him. It is a ridiculous statement by the salafis.we need to know one thing that salafi aqeedah is not the aqeedah of the salaf.every deviant group gives evidence from quran and sunnah but they are devient, because they do not want to understand the meaning of the verse in the way that is indicated
Asharis and maturidis are grave worshipping innovators. Their only supporters are Pakistanis, Turkish, and Bosnians who cant get rid of their cultural baggage and acknowledge their ancestors were wrong. And I say this as a Bosnian who acknowledges that they were wrong. Alhamdullilahah im not a grave worshipping innovator. May Allah protect all Muslims from those things. Btw Muhammad Hijab is athari.
The thing is Ibn Taymiyyah had very good critiques of the asha'ira while not totally dismissing the intellect. It's not an extreme in either way (scripture/reason) even though he was athari.
@Etienne Newell I don't consider myself a liberal, and I live in a country that has its legal system based upon shariah. Yep, still bantering around with my mates about football at the moment. Wanna join?
@Etienne Newell What the hell is a liberal Muslim? A part-time "Muslim?" Someone who picks and chooses what to follow or what their secular liberal masters have decided they can follow?
followers of "pure" islam looking up to mubtadi ibn taymiyya 🙄 it's best to ignore these people because even if ibn taymiyya was a hardcore philosopher they would say "the shaikh was not infallible" or "he repented in his death bed" etc.
@@mughal_r9374 where is the evidence for when he repented? Also what did he repent for? Are you aware of the many misguided innovations and mind boggling statements of his? Specifically Anthropomorphism and Likening Allah Almighty to creation using symbolism and figurative speech
In the you'll realize that in this world nobody will ever concede that his intelligence is lower than somebody else's cause the existence of ego. However leading by example might be more beneficial specifically to its nature of piercing the ego and affect the personal unconscious directly. I sincerely believe the order of the ayah ud'u ila sabili rabbika pointed out how to deliver the message in the sense that hikmah doesn't necessarily involve contest of knowledge, but by being examplary according to the audience and the circumstances. May Allah keeps us united on the straight path
@John Wayne Please enlighten me where the prophet said you cant make an angry face. ''possession of exemplary conduct'' please explain where his profile picture not exemplary and I dont care about your oppinion respectfully but only the prophet (AS) so give me an example from him.
I don’t know if Imaam Shaafi’i is considered a “pseudo salafi” but he put it brilliantly may Allaah have mercy on him: "My judgment concerning Kalaam theologians is that they should be taken around the community and beaten with palm branches and slippers and it will be said to them: this is the punishment for leaving the Words of Allaah and the words of the Messenger of Allaah, sallallaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam."
Imam Ash Shaafi was not referring to the Ashari mutakalimeen who were not present at the time. Ash Shaafi position is in reference to the Muthazilites and Jahmiyya.
I have never seen; unless DawahMan is considered amongst them, the group of detractors, ever call to Islam publicly much less engage non Muslims in any type of dialogue. May Allah keep you on the straight path and forgive your shortcomings, and allow you to benefit us with beneficial knowledge.
Search a channel called, "One Message Foundation" with Uthman Ibn Farooq who is against Kalam. Think of me as a layman. I don't know which side is right, but I gave you the information.
Ramadan always comes at the right time! 👌🏻🌺 O Allah Help me in it to fast and to pray as it is worth, help me avoid its slips and sins, and grant me in it to continuously remember You with Your enabling, O One Who guides those who stray.. And Make my tongue remember You constantly and my heart enthralled by Your love! Ramadan always comes at the right time, and on its exact time.. It comes and life has completely exhausted us And our dreams exhausted us We have reached the end of tired running. He comes and the days have sucked our souls until we vanish completely. He comes to replace sadness with joy, pain with hope, and unhappiness with happiness He comes to rescue her from the pressures of life and rebuild us after our worries have destroyed us 🌙💛 duaa for Ramadan 🤲❤️ O Allah, we seek Your help and we seek Your forgiveness. We attribute all goodness to You. We are grateful to You and refuse to be ungrateful to You; we abandon and forsake all those who reject You. O Allah, You alone we worship, to You alone we pray; to You alone we prostrate, and for You alone we strive; and to You alone we flee for refuge. We hope in Your mercy and we fear Your retribution. Verily, Your punishment is bound to catch up with those who reject the truth. O Allah, do not let worldly affairs (dunya) be our principal concern nor the ultimate limit of our knowledge; do not make the Fire our abode, and make, O Allah, Paradise our home and final dwelling place, by Your Mercy, O Most Merciful of those who show mercy. 💛🌙
@@12HR818 You start with an insult. And this must be an invitation to debate Christian Prince. We have better things to do. For those who want to hear the truth let them come to us. If you don't want to hear the truth. Well, than you are the one who is losing.
@@12HR818 Don't play dumb with me. You didn't use the word Abdools in a respectable manner. We all know that Abdool is used to make fun of muslims. I never have seen muslims use this word in the way you use it.
If you want to value any product (in your case, philosophy) understand its purpose firt. If its purpose is justified just use 'cost and benefit' method. Every product has its advantages and disadvantages. Thats what i use and it works everytime.
Using the Qur'an and the Sunnah wouldn't be anyway controversial as using the so-called contingency argument would be. Allah didn't send ibn Taymiyya to us as a prophet. The fact that those who are using such an argument tend to deny the attributes of Allah is a enough a reason to steer clear of such a perspective in Dawah. May Allah keep us on the right path.
If you believe in attributes that contradictory so you believe in contradiction then it can be allah exist and doesn't exist in the same time But because allah doesn't say to you he doesn't exist so you don't believe in that Oooh mad people your thinking is ridiculous
Just because Ibn Taimiyah wrote about contingency argument doesn't mean he was suggesting to use that argument in dawah, and was saying disbelievers must be given Dawah using contingency argument and not with Qur'an as they don't believe in Quran. This was the point of br Saajid. He didn't say contingency argument doesn't exist, or is wrong, but he said those who think disbelievers must be given Dawah using contingency argument and cannot be given Dawah using Quran are making a mistake. Now if that's your stand point, then refute him and prove how your standpoint is correct. And if that's not your standpoint, then announce as such. In a nutshell, this is not a proper reply to br Saajid, and it's completely off track.
@XER-Islam did the prophet not give dawah to the atheists, and did he use contingency argument when doing so? Did the sahaba use it? Did any of the early scholars of Islam use it? If they didn't need it, and they are the best Muslims, we are better off not using it to give dawah to the atheists.
@@missilemahmood but the atheist of today don’t want to hear about Quran and Sunnah until u establish that there is a necessary being. I really don’t understand y this is a problem when giving dawah. If I make a person understand that there is a necessary being, then u can establish whether or not the creator communicated to his creation. Then sunnah and Quran is brought in leaving the person without any doubt there is a creator and has communicated with us.
@@MThre3 atheists and disbelievers of the past also didn't want to listen to the Quran. They would literally cover their ears with their hands when they would walk past someone reciting Quran.
@@missilemahmood Allah's knowledge is VAST and INFINITE (Quran 18, Verse 109), just because the Prophet didnt use the contingency argument doesnt mean that its not a valid and solid argument.
قال ابن القيّمِ رحمه الله : “ولا يَستقِرُّ للعبدِ قدَمٌ في الإسلامِ حتّى يَعقِدَ قلبَه وسِرَّهُ عَلى أنّ الدِّيـــنَ كُـلَّـه للهِ لا ربَّ سِــواهُ ولا مَتبوعَ غيرُه، وأنّ كلامَ غَيرِه يُعرَضُ على كلامِه، فإِن وافَـقَـه قبِـلـنـاه …وإن خالفه رددناه”. الصواعق المرسلة ٣٠٩/١ Ibn alqyeam said in book of sawaeq almorslah 309/1 : “And know that it is not established that the servant has set foot in Islam until he holds his heart to the fact that the religion is all for God, that guidance is God’s guidance, that the truth revolves with the Messenger of God, existence and non-existence, and that no one else is obeyed and no one else is followed, and that the words of others are presented to his words, and if it agrees with it, we accept it... and if it is against it, we don’t accept it”
My criticism of using Ibn Taymiyyah as a source is that he is NOT RELIABLE to me (ثقة) when it comes to his generalizations about what constitute the madhhab of the salaf, and especially his propensity to declare any position he adopts as being one that has the consensus of Ahlus Sunnah scholars (إجماع), which is not true, because by doing so he casually dismisses many Sunni scholars that have different opinions, and the blind followers like the Madkhalis don't have the wherewithal nor the will to double-check his claims of Ijma'. They just take his claims at face value. Still, if the Madkhalis were to take THE TOTALITY of his opinions and follow them blindly, that would still be acceptable, but the BinSaud mafia puts a filter on Ibn Taymiyyah's Fiqh and Aqeedah, and they pick and choose what the Madkhalis will then follow.
There are lotta people who dont agree with ibn taymiyyah But there is no reason to write this statement.. especially on youtube comment section. Just gonna make people argue.. If you comment something like this on a channel who don't agree with ibn taymiyyah that makes sense, But if you do it on a channel who takes from ibn taymiyyah.. it's unwise And there are no scholars that are perfectly reliable.. and what do u mean by reliable
Your "criticism" on this great scholar hahahahahaha, who are you even? a nobody. So we all due respect, please keep your "criticism" to yourself as it holds no value in the Islamic world.
Ibn taymia is not our prophet but he is one of the greatest ahlusunnah scholars. Of course he is a human and he errors, but his errors are small, and therefore he demands respect if you're main stream ahlusunnah and not extreme shia or suufi
I was also thinking about this and maybe even making a video on this. I feel like using philosophy in dawah is the same thing as Muslims who use christianity (The Bible) against Christians. Your just using their methodology against themselves in order to provide an argument for our methodology. Using philosophy and that way of thinking to prove islam against people who use philosophy is the same thing (imo lol). Very interesting what ibn taymiyyah said though.
@@Moath1277 he didn’t refute the points made here. He is saying don’t use philosophy to understand the deen but you can use philosophy to go against atheism.
@@petritkola Hypothetically, let's assume what you're saying is right. Is it not unhealthy for your heart to do da'wah with philosophy as your imaan will (unwillingly) be (partly or fully, 'audhu billah) reliant/based on them? Are you not training your own heart to base your own imaan on philosophical argumentation instead of actual 'ilm? Investing those hours to think like them, study their books, their way of thinking. Do you really think it won't infect your heart? It's different from studying the Bible because the line is clearly drawn between haqq and baatil (I.e., Quran vs Bible) while philosophy has a gray area because you accept to argue within the concepts laid forward and work within them, using Islamic concepts within the philosophical framework. So much so, that you will truly have to (start to) believe the rationalization/conversion of Islamic concepts to/within the philosophical framework. What will your heart do when you lose a debate defending Islam based on philosophy instead of 'ilm (which will never make you fall short)? It can't be as simple as "just losing a battle". I'm a nobody but in my opinion doing da'wah or debating with philosophy for Islam is a trap (in disguise) and may form the other party's understanding of Islam within their framework instead of Islam's own framework which it deserves. Just some food for thought/naseeha from one brother to another on a late Saturday :D
@@alfarq hahah I appreciate the Saturday (well Sunday here in madinah) advice. I get you, I think my thing is only those who have a good understanding of the deen and aqeedah should partake in it and not everyone should. But if there are some people who know Islam really well, are fully grounded in the proper aqeedah, and have a good teacher who can help them understand where the line should be drawn, then it wouldn’t be too bad Inshallah. That’s my opinion but I get what your saying
It is haram sport but lets hope through other things he can be instrumental to islam. Sometimes Allah uses a sinner to assist islam. -hadith in sahih muslim كما قال
dont forget ibn taymiyyah got ghazali allllll wrong but LOVED using his arguments respect the Hujjat al-Islam - and no Sina did a great job for the contingency argument but he got way into philosophy in some deviant ways - instead it was GHAZALI who mastered the kalam cosmological argument - read Iqtisad and then read the tahafut al falasfia where he brilliantly kept theology within shariah to prove the deviant ways of philosopher’s misconstrued and wrong, like sina - saying the world always exsisted with Allah (swt) etc…. smh Hijab I know u have a large “salafi” following but one of you finally need to give Ghazali credit - because I know you respect the heck out of him but barely bring him up - The great an-nawawi said if ALL scholarly books become lost but the ihya ulum ad-din survived, Islam would survive (he meant other than the beautiful Quran of course) WAS A MASTER IN USUL AL FIQH (some say the greatest ever…read the Mustafa…), THEOLOGY, PHILOSOPHY WITHIN THE BOUNDS OF THE SHARIAH, KALAM, etc …. the only thing he was not strong in was Hadith sciences but he finally AFTER ALL THE OTHER STUDYING began studying hadith - hence why is last works had all sahih hadith - the imam was one in a million
If any one believe that common sense (laws of reason) doesn't apply to allah or any thing then you are mad so if atheist says to you that the Qur'an have a contradiction don't defend
Ash-Shaafi'i said: "My judgment concerning Kalaam theologians is that they should be taken around the community and beaten with palm branches and slippers and it will be said to them: this is the punishment for leaving the Words of Allah and the words of the Messenger of Allah, sallallaahu 'alayhi wa sallam." Mohammed Hijab you are a disingenuous individual especially as you want to use Ibn Taymiyyah RH to back up your claims as some sort of authority but previously disregarded him and belittled him. You can't have your cake and eat it. Hijab you know what you’re doing is insincere and falsehood. The difference between ibn taymiyyah RH and people of your ilk is that he heard the arguments of the people of kalam and showed their error in their arguments l.e refuted their baatil and foolishness whilst you use kalam to prove Allahs existence and support your claims. That is not the same. Ibn taymiyyah RH never used kalam to prove Allahs existence or attributes. You are a liar and you should fear Allah swt. th-cam.com/video/10cvFb14IfY/w-d-xo.html
@@soulunknown1 It's a good thing we're not talking about the same kalam then. Ahmed bin Hanbal (RH) used philosophy in his arguments against the mutazila, you have no understanding of anything and have no business discussing it until you do.
Good work on the book. I would recommend it! Also good job by Hijab and co for providing the paperbacks for a very low cost, so no excuse. Go out and buy!
The contingency argument can only be used by people who accept the doctrine of divine simplicity. 1) If you say attributes are distinct from the essence you have contradicted the contingency argument There has to be a first component in the chain Once a distinction between attributes and essence is made, one must be contingent and the other can’t, if the essence is necessary then it wouldn’t have the attributes. If the attributes were necessary you wouldn’t have the essence. If you disagree with this you disagree with the contingency argument itself. The only way to get out of this is to affirm the attributes are identical to the essence. 2) All parts of a whole must have a finite quality to distinguish one part from another. There must be some sort of limitation for a part to be distinguishable from other parts. If God is composed of finite attributes that aren’t other than Him yet not identical then He has a finite nature. If He’s finite, then He’s not a necessary being.
I would just like to add that I’ve seen more of the video and ibn taymiyyah claims the attributes of god are necessary so going back to what I said, if the attributes of god are necessary then the essence is not since you can’t have 2 necessary things according to the contingency argument. If the attributes are necessary then the essence itself would never exist.
Ash-Shaafi'i said: "My judgment concerning Kalaam theologians is that they should be taken around the community and beaten with palm branches and slippers and it will be said to them: this is the punishment for leaving the Words of Allah and the words of the Messenger of Allah, sallallaahu 'alayhi wa sallam." Mohammed Hijab you are a disingenuous individual especially as you want to use Ibn Taymiyyah RH to back up your claims as some sort of authority but previously disregarded him and belittled him. You can't have your cake and eat it. Hijab you know what you’re doing is insincere and falsehood. The difference between ibn taymiyyah RH and people of your ilk is that he heard the arguments of the people of kalam and showed their error in their arguments l.e refuted their baatil and foolishness whilst you use kalam to prove Allahs existence and support your claims. That is not the same. Ibn taymiyyah RH never used kalam to prove Allahs existence or attributes. You are a liar and you should fear Allah swt. th-cam.com/video/10cvFb14IfY/w-d-xo.html
No it can’t only be used by those who accept ADS as we don’t believe the attributes can be separated from Allah or that He is like a Lego piece (nauzibillah) Any ADS clown who thinks this is straw-manning our beliefs. Mohammed Hijabs approach to this in that using the word piece in place of part to avoid confusion is a good thing.
52:35 أَمْ خُلِقُوا۟ مِنْ غَيْرِ شَىْءٍ أَمْ هُمُ ٱلْخَـٰلِقُونَ ٣٥ Or were they created by nothing, or are they ˹their own˺ creator? - Dr. Mustafa Khattab, the Clear Quran
This is exactly why we should learn Arabic. As long as we're ignorant of knowledge in Arabic books, we will constantly bicker amongst ourselves. Maybe these pseudo salafis should learn the language first.
the problem with muslims is when an ignoramous/students start critiquing the scholars….if our ancestors ulama developed Kalam to respond to Hellenic Philosophy, it is even more important for our contemporary ulama to respond to the current Western Philosophy using Kalam and its derivatives
Ash-Shaafi'i said: "My judgment concerning Kalaam theologians is that they should be taken around the community and beaten with palm branches and slippers and it will be said to them: this is the punishment for leaving the Words of Allah and the words of the Messenger of Allah, sallallaahu 'alayhi wa sallam." Mohammed Hijab you are a disingenuous individual especially as you want to use Ibn Taymiyyah RH to back up your claims as some sort of authority but previously disregarded him and belittled him. You can't have your cake and eat it. Hijab you know what you’re doing is insincere and falsehood. The difference between ibn taymiyyah RH and people of your ilk is that he heard the arguments of the people of kalam and showed their error in their arguments l.e refuted their baatil and foolishness whilst you use kalam to prove Allahs existence and support your claims. That is not the same. Ibn taymiyyah RH never used kalam to prove Allahs existence or attributes. You are a liar and you should fear Allah swt. th-cam.com/video/10cvFb14IfY/w-d-xo.html
Need to understand that alot of scholars were also misguided at the beginning, e.g. Al-Ghazali made tawba and accepted the Manhaj of Imam Ahmad, Imam Ahmad was following Ahlul Sunnah afaik and Ghazali died like this.
I am a Muslim Shia brother and I applaud your great improvement in Arabic. You grew up in the west so we gotta give credit where its due. I have seen your Arabic evolve substantially. Good job my dear brother in Islam👏👏
@@mumin9436 there are no sects of Islam… we don’t do sects so ascribing yourself to one shows there’s no such thing. People ascribing to sects are in the fire 🔥👍🏾
@@soulunknown1 u cannot find "sects" in books of religion....sects is formed when there is difference of opinion and group splits...muslims all around the world follow different ideologies/sects within islam . there are thousands of diff ideologies/sects within islam that was born in the past 1400 years . saying again. You cant deny reality. There is no one single entity thats "official" islam
@@mumin9436 Then you deny the messenger you claim to follow.. The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) stood among us and said: “Those who came before you of the people of the Book split into seventy-two sects, and this ummah will split into seventy-three: seventy-two in Hell and one in Paradise, and that is the jamaa’ah (main body of Muslims).”
May Allah swt unite the Muslims, with a sound part amongst them that accept the fact and right that there may be differences of opinion based upon legal evidence from our sources, Qur'an, Sunnah, Idjma'a Sahabah and Qiyas. Like how there is a consensus and sound understanding on the 4 Madhabs, which are accepted with their differences. May we learn to appreciate the vast wealth that a legal (valid) broad spectrum brings and how it is a mechanism that enables and underscores the practical capability of Islam to adress all aspects of human life, whatever we may encounter in regards to actions and things, whenever or where ever we may be. For the Deen is complete and Legislator has not left a single issue without a Hukm.
Ash-Shaafi'i said: "My judgment concerning Kalaam theologians is that they should be taken around the community and beaten with palm branches and slippers and it will be said to them: this is the punishment for leaving the Words of Allah and the words of the Messenger of Allah, sallallaahu 'alayhi wa sallam." Mohammed Hijab you are a disingenuous individual especially as you want to use Ibn Taymiyyah RH to back up your claims as some sort of authority but previously disregarded him and belittled him. You can't have your cake and eat it. Hijab you know what you’re doing is insincere and falsehood. The difference between ibn taymiyyah RH and people of your ilk is that he heard the arguments of the people of kalam and showed their error in their arguments l.e refuted their baatil and foolishness whilst you use kalam to prove Allahs existence and support your claims. That is not the same. Ibn taymiyyah RH never used kalam to prove Allahs existence or attributes. You are a liar and you should fear Allah swt. th-cam.com/video/10cvFb14IfY/w-d-xo.html
You linked a different book, "The deception of the new atheist"(which I will also be reading by the way 😂, let me know if that is not free) not the Burhan, please update the link, Jazakumulah khairan
A true representation of the Ayah in the Quran "Muḥammad is the Messenger of Allah. And those with him are firm with the disbelievers1 and compassionate with one another. You see them bowing and prostrating2 ˹in prayer˺, seeking Allah’s bounty and pleasure. The sign ˹of brightness can be seen˺ on their faces from the trace of prostrating ˹in prayer˺. This is their description in the Torah.3 And their parable in the Gospel is that of a seed that sprouts its ˹tiny˺ branches, making it strong. Then it becomes thick, standing firmly on its stem, to the delight of the planters4-in this way Allah makes the believers a source of dismay for the disbelievers.5 To those of them who believe and do good, Allah has promised forgiveness and a great reward." Al Fath, 29. Love your calmness with the Muslim brothers
Wow , so muhammad hijab can't actually defend the contradiction between the contingency argument and the hadiths and verses of allah's attributes? He can only resort to indirect "tu quoque" whataboutism by basically saying " well if there's a contradiction then ibn taymiyya is making the same error " . That isn't a defence, that's just dragging someone else into error with you. To try and make the problem go away by asserting that the attributes of allah , the body parts of allah for example, are necessary is plainly just untrue and unconvincing. How can you say it's necessary for allah to have the body part of a shin? where is the contradiction in allah not having a shin? to say something is necessary is to say that it is impossible to be otherwise. muhammad hijab himself gave the example that it would be ridiculous to say that a man having a moustache or wearing a hat is necesessay since there clearly is no contradiction to a man not having a moustache or a hat and so it's not impossible to be otherwise, and so not necessary. But clearly the same goes for allah having 2 right hands (why not only 1 hand? what would be impossible or logically contradictory about that? nothing) or a shin, or palms and fingers or any of the other body parts in hadith. OR even if you ignore this and just dogmatically assert to yourself that such body parts are necessary without reason, What about the hadith of allah descending into the lowest heaven every night or putting his foot into hell? that shows that allah has a position and this position changes. Clearly if his position is changing that means that it is possible for his position to be otherwise and so it is not necessary . How is any of this befitting of a logically necessary being? a being where it is logically impossible for it to be otherwise? obviously it isn't.
These people who are trying to work against hijab do not understand how important his work is for the muslim who grows up in the west. From very early on we get indoctrinated into the new age atheism paradigm. Hijab helped me see that that worldview is not the most reasonable worldview to hold and it contains a whole lot of blind faith. What hijab does is a counterattack to new age atheism. And these guys are sadly trying to cut him down. So that despicable beings such as AP then can say “oh look even the muslims are against hojab on this”. Im sorry to say to these so called paeudo salafis. But i cant just have faith like a christian does despite the contradictions. I need reasons built up from the ground.
*Proof for logical/philosophical arguments in the Quran.* In the Qurʾān, Allah Taʿālā tells us: We shall show them Our signs in every region of the earth and in themselves, until it becomes clear to them that this is the Truth. [Sūra Fuṣṣilat 53] This method of logical deduction was the way of all the previous prophets and earlier scholars of this Umma. (See Sūras Hūd 28 and 32, Al-Anʿām 76 to 83, Al-Anbiyā 58, Al-Baqarah 258 and Al-Naḥl 125.) It is Allah’s command that we exercise our intellect in reflecting over His signs in order to repel any doubts that may arise in the mind. The science of ʿIlm al-Kalām seeks to achieve the same objective. A group of atheists once approached the great Imām, Abū Ḥanīfa with the intention of killing him. The Imām asked them what they would say about a person who claims that he has seen a ship laden with goods sailing on the sea transporting the goods from one shore to another. The goods are piled onto the ship automatically and are similarly off-loaded by themselves upon reaching their destination. The ship navigates the waves perfectly all by itself with no sailor to steer it. They replied that no sane human would accept such a nonsensical contention. Thereupon the Imām remarked: "Pity upon your intelligence. If a mere ship cannot sail smoothly without a sailor, how then can it be ever possible that this entire universe runs so perfectly without a controller?" Upon hearing this they were utterly embarrassed and immediately accepted Islam at the hands of the Imām. Someone once asked Imām Mālik to provide a proof of the existence of a Creator. The Imām indicated towards his face and observed that despite the face of man being so small, it consists of two eyes, a nose, two ears, a tongue, cheeks, lips and other parts. Notwithstanding this, no two persons’ facial features are identical. Likewise the voice, mannerisms, character and habits of every person is unique. This is proof enough that all of this is the work of a Supreme Creator.
@Turkish Salafi just saying aristotilian logic isnt sufficient to discount it since knowledge can be sought from non muslims. The Messenger of Allah, ص, said, *“The word of wisdom is the lost property of the believer. Wherever he finds it, he is most deserving of it.”* Source: Sunan al-Tirmidhī 2687 Grade: Hasan
Assalamu-alaikum. Just because they didn't do something doesn't mean it's forbidden for us. For example, later generation of Muslims compiled the hadith books, but we know that the prophet and the sahaba never compiled the hadeeth into books. So should we get rid of hadith books??
Then how do u speak to an atheist about Quran and sunnah wen they don’t wat that brought into the argument because they don’t believe in it. But wen u established there is a necessary being, u can they argue whether or not the creator has communicated with his creation or not. The contingency argue opens the door for Quran and sunnah to be explained to the atheist. Mayb if u know of another way to speak to the atheist, please advise us on how that can be done…
@@MThre3 oh you don't think there are arguments for those in the Quran ?? Allah addresses atheists in many many ayahs and asks them to contemplate and think about the origin of the universe. We don't need any other source of dawah than the Quran and Sunnah they're complete you can convince them about the existence of a creator just by these two. Most atheists convert because of reading the Quran and contemplate in it not because of philosophy.
@@gajiburrahman7378 wa alaikum salam brother. The reason why they didn't comply books of hadith is because they had to use what was available at the time to write quran there wasn't enough material to support writing everything including the hadiths but the main and principal object was to preserve the Quran. Also, there's no means of comparison between that and using philosophy in dawah. All this philosophy brother hijab is talking about was there during the time of sahabas but they didn't use ilm kalam or greek philosophy in Dawah !
@@sarras444 And they didn’t use theophilosophical arguments because they didn’t have a need for it. Just like scientific method. We can use scientific method to explore the world and give dawah.
The truth is philosophy is very dangerous and many fatwas have prohibited studying philosophy except if you are forced to ( like in high school) or for dawaah to non Muslims that use philosophy. To the general public tho , why use philosophy???? Philosophy does not have limits, there is nothing that it can't question or has not questioned already. When you reference philosophy you implicitly accept it as a way of finding truth , whereas us as Muslims we should stick to the Quran and Sunnah. If a Muslim does not have a solid faith, delving into philosophy might make him or her even leave Islam. Using philosophy with the general public is dangerous. Ibn taymya does not explicitly say "contingency, a theory in philosophy ". He uses logic not philosophy, there is a fine line there. Philosophy is a filed of science now... it is no more just looking for the truth like Socrates defined it. When you reference philosophy to general public you low-key encourage them to read more which is perilous to non-scholars. May Allah bless you and guide us all towards haq. Love you hijab really as a brother in Islam. Please reconsider. Also,Sajid obviously only seeks out the truth ,he talks without having any grudge against anyone... the fact he talked about contingency which you obviously cherish doesn't mean he is your enemy. Why call him pseudo-salafi ?? Please check this detailed fatwa on studying philosophy : islamqa.info/en/answers/88184/ruling-on-studying-philosophy
Ya, the people who keep critiquing philosophy don't even know the basic definition of the term. They clearly conflate philosophy as a whole with Greek or Aristotelianism.
you need to talk to people in dawah in the language and manner they understand it .the prophet was given the quran in arabic that his people can knows it is the truth
Ash-Shaafi'i said: "My judgment concerning Kalaam theologians is that they should be taken around the community and beaten with palm branches and slippers and it will be said to them: this is the punishment for leaving the Words of Allah and the words of the Messenger of Allah, sallallaahu 'alayhi wa sallam." Mohammed Hijab you are a disingenuous individual especially as you want to use Ibn Taymiyyah RH to back up your claims as some sort of authority but previously disregarded him and belittled him. You can't have your cake and eat it. Hijab you know what you’re doing is insincere and falsehood. The difference between ibn taymiyyah RH and people of your ilk is that he heard the arguments of the people of kalam and showed their error in their arguments l.e refuted their baatil and foolishness whilst you use kalam to prove Allahs existence and support your claims. That is not the same. Ibn taymiyyah RH never used kalam to prove Allahs existence or attributes. You are a liar and you should fear Allah swt. th-cam.com/video/10cvFb14IfY/w-d-xo.html
I like the video before I've seen it and I don't follow the stream. This is a rare phenomena, which can be applied to Mohammed hijab videos. Jazakallahkhairan
I've known this for s long time that you can't take knowledge from the salafi because he will only cherry pick statements that back his claim... Rather follow true scholars who have given their entire life for ilm and they have a chain of transmission going back to the prophet... Books alone cannot give knowledge but sitting with true scholars is the sahabi way. ..I call salafis PDF shaykhs
It's enough for me that the prophet never used it in dawah nor his companions they always referred to the Quran and Sunnah. Shouldn't we follow him peace be upon him ? You don't know any better than him or his companions RA
Muhammad Qasin said in another comment which explains it nicely: Proof for logical/philosophical arguments in the Quran. In the Qur'an, Allah Ta'ala tells us: We shall show them Our signs in every region of the earth and in themselves, until it becomes clear to them that this is the Truth. [Süra Fussilat 53] This method of logical deduction was the way of all the previous prophets and earlier scholars of this Umma. (See Suras Hüd 28 and 32, Al-Anâm 76 to 83, Al-Anbiyâ 58, Al- Baqarah 258 and Al-Nahl 125.) It is Allah's command that we exercise our intellect in reflecting over His signs in order to repel any doubts that may arise in the mind. The science of "Ilm al-Kalam seeks to achieve the same objective.
Assalamu alaikum. Ibn Taymiyya is not bringing a new argument that was not understood by the Sahaba. He was simply explaining the fact that dependent things must exist by an eternal Creator. He was explicating this simple fact in technical terms which sophisticated people will find easier to accept. The arguments you should use depend on your audience.
@@sarras444 ALLAH even uses the western media of propaganda to spread Islam. ALLAH is not limited to any means by which HE guides his servants. U have a very narrow way of lookin at things…
Brother the argument is brilliant But you can't say Allah is partless, you can say instead that within the creation, everything that is made of parts is contingent. And the set of laws (including: parts->contingent) made by the creator are not to be applied to the creator. It stops within the creation
Ash-Shaafi'i said: "My judgment concerning Kalaam theologians is that they should be taken around the community and beaten with palm branches and slippers and it will be said to them: this is the punishment for leaving the Words of Allah and the words of the Messenger of Allah, sallallaahu 'alayhi wa sallam." Mohammed Hijab you are a disingenuous individual especially as you want to use Ibn Taymiyyah RH to back up your claims as some sort of authority but previously disregarded him and belittled him. You can't have your cake and eat it. Hijab you know what you’re doing is insincere and falsehood. The difference between ibn taymiyyah RH and people of your ilk is that he heard the arguments of the people of kalam and showed their error in their arguments l.e refuted their baatil and foolishness whilst you use kalam to prove Allahs existence and support your claims. That is not the same. Ibn taymiyyah RH never used kalam to prove Allahs existence or attributes. You are a liar and you should fear Allah swt. th-cam.com/video/10cvFb14IfY/w-d-xo.html
free book: sapienceinstitute.org/theburhan/
*Proof for logical/philosophical arguments in the Quran.*
In the Qurʾān, Allah Taʿālā tells us:
We shall show them Our signs in every region of the earth and in
themselves, until it becomes clear to them that this is the Truth. [Sūra Fuṣṣilat 53]
This method of logical deduction was the way of all the previous prophets and earlier scholars of this Umma. (See Sūras Hūd 28 and 32, Al-Anʿām 76 to 83, Al-Anbiyā 58, Al-Baqarah 258 and Al-Naḥl 125.) It is Allah’s command that we exercise our intellect in reflecting over His signs in order to repel any
doubts that may arise in the mind. The science of ʿIlm al-Kalām seeks to achieve the same objective.
A group of atheists once approached the great Imām, Abū Ḥanīfa with the intention of killing him. The Imām asked them what they would say about a person who claims that he has seen a ship laden with goods sailing on the sea transporting the goods from one shore to another. The goods are piled onto the ship automatically and are similarly off-loaded by themselves upon reaching their destination. The ship navigates the waves perfectly all by itself with no sailor to steer it. They replied that no sane human would accept such a nonsensical contention. Thereupon the Imām remarked: "Pity upon your intelligence. If a mere ship cannot sail smoothly without a sailor, how then can it be ever possible that this entire universe runs so perfectly without a controller?" Upon hearing this they were utterly embarrassed and immediately accepted Islam at the hands of the Imām. Someone once asked Imām Mālik to provide a proof of the existence of a
Creator. The Imām indicated towards his face and observed that despite the face of man being so small, it consists of two eyes, a nose, two ears, a tongue, cheeks, lips and other parts.
Notwithstanding this, no two persons’ facial features are identical. Likewise the voice, mannerisms, character and habits of every person is unique. This is proof enough that all of this is the work of a Supreme Creator.
Inshaa Allah will read the book
Jazak Allahu khair for the work you done and keep doing for the ummah. You are to some degree under valued! May Allah grant you a long life with afiyah and a pious life.
I thought to myself, what is that on his head? ^^
I wanted to watch the video just because of the hat ^^ so funny and stylish. Masha'Allah
I am a Sunni Ashari/Maturidi and I see no difference between you and me in Aqaid.
I wonder how the pseudo-salafi critique react to your video ... ^
People like you with real knowledge are really appreciated.
May Allah ta ala prolong your life and increase your knowledge in general and specifically in Islam.
Keep up your good work. We love you for Allah ta ala.
You can tell he went to Nigeria! 😂 Big up to Hijab for repping my home land and going to Nigeria to give Dawah. May Allah continue to bless him and his family with goodness! Amin!
Abduls...still someone who believe Allah kebab is not shatain👹 and Mou👹Mad is agent...I see how shatain works well.😂
Aamiin.
@@Mar-dk3mp I don't speak Cow turds, Pajeet. Speak English.
Salam from the African part of Nigeria!
@@Mar-dk3mp I repeat. I don't speak Cow turd gobbler language.
The Quran and Sunna doesn't forbid reasoning rather it evaluates these arguments and it lays down the basics for Iman while destroying falsehood.
True.
Allah tells mankind to reason many times in the Quran..
True, its that some ppl take ideas against Islam and call it common sense, like ppl who deny Allah's attributes and compare Allah to creation or assume comparison.
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543like for example ibn sina and similar figures.
"destroys falsehood"? how do you know?
@matswessling6600 It's the duty of every sane and mature person to seek out the truth to the best of their capability by tapping into the numinous nature of our humanity and to make the use of reasoning to ask Allah for His guidance with sincerity in the heart.
I find many salafis as arrogant. For them everyone who disagrees with them is a deviant. I used to be influenced by salafis but this behaviour of many of the followers of "salaf" is very repulsive. So much bad feeling for brothers.
Facts
same thing. I have kinda left that cult too, I incline more to the orthodoxy nowadays.
Agreed. I do agree with a lot of things which Salafis preach but at the end of the day, their take that anyone who disagrees with them is a deviant is really arrogant and just wrong on many levels.
@@kingsentertainment786 which is?
@@MuhammadWaqas-zv6qz like what do you agree and based on what?
Mashallah i never knew that Ibn Taymiya Rahimullah had such deep understanding of philosophy especially the contingency argument. Really eye opening.
He had a deep understanding of pretty everything ma sha'a Allah.
My fear is pro salafist will even call ibn Taymiahh (RA) a deviant.
Ibn Taymiya celebrated Mawlid, he is the reason why we muslim believe that the world is round and he is also the reason (mainly) why hashish is Haram.
Because he did not like people who smoked it 🙄(that's actually the truth)🤣.
it’s called al-ghazali - he liked to say he was a deviant but LOVED USING many if his arguments for the oroof Allah (yes its Al Ghazali that masted the Kalam Cosmological Argument that we know today not ibn Sina)…….which many “salfists” call ghazali a deviant 😅 and its always taqlid which they are against because you can tell NONE of fhem DEF NEVER READ ANY OF HIS WORK
.
I really don't understand these neo salafis, they keep repeating the same nonsense but not willing to sit with mohammed hijab and discuss the issues. That shows their dishonesty.
I’m very shocked specially with saajid I was not expecting him to be so confidence in attacking
Sheikh Abul Feda’s detailed refutation of the points brought up in the video: th-cam.com/video/e9jwa5Qs9Ck/w-d-xo.html
@@Moath1277 According to Sheikh Abul Feda what IT did what Haram then
@@coolsticks99 who?
@@Moath1277 IT Ibn Taymiyyah
I did read that book of ibn taimia long ago, Now i have a nostalgic feeling, to add the book is full of rational argument and philosophical responses, in that time i was reading a page more than three time to understand the idea, great book. Thanks akhi
Talking about منهاج السنة
If there was a God, there would be no discussion or debate. TAKBIR!!
@unknown if god existed you would not need a argument for it. Think about it. TAKBIR!!!
@unknown no no I believe in the contingency argument. Lol. The concept of a God is a human construction. We have zero evidence otherwise. People believe in unicorns doesnt mean they exist. belief means nothing in reality. Reality is that a prophet named Mohamed was taken back to jannah on a flying horse and the moon was split in two seems very unlikely. Almost comical in this day and age to believe a God would be so sloppy with his message. Quran has no order and needs hadith after hadith to explain it. I mean what type of god operates in such a illogical fashion?
@unknown here we go. You understand how evidence works right? Give me your very best evidence.
The hat looks great! It is used not only in Nigeria but the whole Sahel/Sahara. It is in Sudan, Chad, Niger Republic, Nigeria, Mali, Mauritania, etc. I think in the Nigerian local language of Hausa, they call it "Hula". Hausa is an Afro-Asiatic language just like Arabic, so they have no "P" in their language as well.
Ibn taymiyyah and all those great scholars from his time were wise.. unlike those neo salafi youtubers..
Who are the neo salafi TH-camrs? Pls tell me so I can avoid
Who are those neo salafi TH-camrs ?
@@TopStrikerMaverick Rule of thumb , avoid "Salafis" who attack Muslims and never do Dawah or even charity .
@@iklmn naseeha sessions?
@@TopStrikerMaverick he’s clearly talking about saajid Mohammed hijab has no animosity towards Imran from naseeha sessions
We have to agree with Ibn Taymiyyah who said "kalam sharpens the mind".
Actually, it's directly observable in the example of brother Hijab
When we exercise any science we can get wrong as human beings. It doesn't mean science is bad. I mean all kinds of science including religious ones; fiqh, tafsir, hadith et cetera. Exercising Kalam, Mantiq, or logic stimulates certain parts of the brain and causes the growth of neurons. I am sorry to those guys who denigrate the Aql/Intellect and the consequences of that are observable in them too
You compare the sciences of tafsir, hadith and fiqh with kalam?
Thafs why imam as safii called for those who practice kalam tl be flogged
Imām Ibn Taymiyyah said:
"And so let the knowledgeable believer reflect carefully on how this invented Kalām has divided the Ummah
divided and sowed enmity and hatred in it."
[Darʾ At-Taʿāruḍ (2/306)]
You must understand. Just because something good goes forth from one thing it doesnt follow that the whole is good.
are there asepcts which are quite beneficial in todays democracies? For sure. Does thaf make democracy itself good?
Jazak Allah khair brother Muhammad Hijab , i have benefited from this video , and may Allah guide those whom try to block the dawah and the truth .
Sheikh Abul Feda’s detailed refutation of the points brought up in the video: th-cam.com/video/e9jwa5Qs9Ck/w-d-xo.html
@@Moath1277 So he is refuting Ibn Tamiyaa, not Hijab. Lol, ok
@@Moath1277 And that video is 3 months old. How is it a refutation of this video?
@@abumansaray7 did I say it’s a refutation of this video? Pay attention dear brother, I said it refutes the exact points mentioned in it, BarakAllahu feek.
@@abumansaray7 He is refutating Hijab and explaining the point of view of ibn Taymiyyah in the correct context. And I recommend you watch the video yourself instead of arguing with me about it.
MashaAllah. May Allah put barakah in your 'ilm. These pseudo salafis have a very shallow understanding of Deen. They'll pick and choose references to support their agenda and then hastily pass judgement on anyone who disagrees. If they just read the books they refer to, instead of regurgitating what their 'scholars' say, all will be solved
they are also the people who go onto become isis and al q
Sheikh Abul Feda’s detailed refutation of the points brought up in the video: th-cam.com/video/e9jwa5Qs9Ck/w-d-xo.html
Ash-Shaafi'i said: "My judgment concerning
Kalaam theologians is that they should be taken
around the community and beaten with palm
branches and slippers and it will be said to them: this is the punishment for leaving the Words of Allah and the words of the Messenger of Allah, sallallaahu 'alayhi wa sallam."
Mohammed Hijab you are a disingenuous individual especially as you want to use Ibn Taymiyyah RH to back up your claims as some sort of authority but previously disregarded him and belittled him. You can't have your cake and eat it.
Hijab you know what you’re doing is insincere and falsehood. The difference between ibn
taymiyyah RH and people of your ilk is that he
heard the arguments of the people of kalam and showed their error in their arguments l.e refuted their baatil and foolishness whilst you use kalam to prove Allahs existence and support your claims.
That is not the same. Ibn taymiyyah RH never
used kalam to prove Allahs existence or
attributes. You are a liar and you should fear Allah swt.
th-cam.com/video/10cvFb14IfY/w-d-xo.html
@@soulunknown1 well said brother.
Again, a perfect example of cherry picking and misinterpretation to fit an agenda. And another example of regurgitation.
Of course in any science there are those who transgress the limits. Even in the science of Hadith, there are those that lie. When we talk about 'ilmul kalaam we're referring to it's correct usage. Why assume the opposite? Just like when we refer to muhaddithoon, are we refering to those who lie about Ahadith? Imam Shafi'i is referring to the likes of the Mu'tazila etc. Not the scholars of ahlus sunnah who use it correctly.
وكيف يكون كلام أهل السنة والجماعة مذموما عنده وقد تكلم فيه وناظر من ناظره وكشف عن تمويه من ألقىلى سمع بعض أصحابه من أهل الأهواء شيئا مما هم فيه?
“And how could he [al-Shafi’i] consider the kalaam of Ahl al-Sunnah wal-Jama’a as criminal when he himself followed it, debating with those who debated [Kalaam] and the errors Uncovered doubts among some of his disciples?”
(Manaaqibul Imam Shafi'i)
This really just proves my point of having a very shallow understanding of Deen and hastily passing judgement...
Like how much calmer you're in this video. I think you're brilliant and in couple of years or so, will be one of the top scholars of Islam. Keep it up Hijab!
Inshaa Allah he is a legend indeed
he became really more mature
I like it too but it could also be attributed to the fasting
Agree inshallah he will reach right path
Indeed Masha’Allah May Allah Azzawajjal preserved him for this Ummah Ameen Ya Rabbi
This discourse would be infinitely better if the laymen on the anti-philosophy side understood the concept of "defining terms".
I dont know why they cling so hard on “greek philosophy” thing.
Defining terms is a philosophy thing, so I guess..
@@Radec913 Because that is what their scholars for dollsrs tell them to. They even brainwash them not to listen to anyone from the other side. They don't have any confidence on their approach. That is why they resort to threatening and outright extremism.
We have to agree with Ibn Taymiyyah that he said "kalam sharpens the mind". Actually it's directly observable in example of brother Hijab
Ibn Taymīyyah was against Falsāfa, Kalām and 'Ilm Al-Kalām.
@@muhammadaaus105 no he wasnt 🤣🤣🤣
@@isaatturki8569
Asalām 'Alaykum.
Barak Allāhu Fīk. You can read Al-Iqtidā' As-Sirātul Mustaqīm of ibn Taymīyyah (رحمه الله), there he has refuted them and has spoken ill of them. You can read the English version of which the PDF is available online if you can not read Arabic.
He also a comprehensive treatise on the refutation of Mantiq (Logic), which is known as Ar-Rad 'Ala Mantiq if I'm not mistaken.
As for his indulgence within philosophy, it was his studying the subject inorder for the achievement of the refutation. Similarly how a Muslim would study Christianity inorder to refute and call people towards Islām. That studying does not makes him a Christian.
@@muhammadaaus105 its about the kalam of other sects not about kalam al ahlul sunnah
@@isaatturki8569
You can watch the video of Sheikh 'Uthmān ibn Fārūq regarding this subject.
You are always welcome to Nigeria brother.
I just wish both sides accept their different approaches and stop going back and forth. In my opinion both approaches are necessary. Different audiences.
The issue is one side is calling the other deviant.
@@Radec913 I am talking to both sides. I stand with M hijab’s position on this one. I am looking at the bigger picture. Unity.
@@Just_logic reconciliation is best.
These guys like sajid imo dont get how important the work of muhammed hijab is for muslims who grew up in the west and have been going to school here and have been goong to university here.
We get indoctrinated into the new age atheism from very early on and we dont even notice it.
Muhammed hijab destroys that paradigm with his argumentation.
I will be honest to say that i think without sapience institute and the dawah these guys give i maybe wouldve been an atheist now.
But now, its inconceivable for me. Nobody can take my belief in allah away from me now anymore (except allah himself ofcourse).
@@soulunknown1 stop ur copypaste
@@soulunknown1 you obviously don’t know know the definition of Elm Alkalam. Alkalam means logic superceeding shear’.
Thank you @MohammedHijab I consider myself a humble follower of Salafia and I appreciate what youve shared. Jaza kallahu khair!
Aren’t we all followers of Salafia
@@ukasxm8245 no
The cap u were on ur head, is our traditional cap. Wow it look beautiful to u brother, Masha Allah. May Allah bless u
The man who built the Titanic was asked, How safe would the Titanic be? With an Ironic Tone he said: "NOT EVEN GOD CAN SINK IT" & we all know what happened to the Titanic..
Tancredo Neves President of Brazil. During a campaign, he said he got 500,000 votes for his party, Not even God would remove him from Presidency. Sure he got the votes, but he got sick & died a day before being made President..
Cazuza Brazilian singer & poet. During a show, while smoking his cigarette, he puffed out some smoke into the air & said: "God that's for u". He died at the age of 32 of LUNG CANCER in a horrible manner..
Allah SWT says in Qur’an Al-Kareem "Do not walk proudly on the earth: your feet cannot cleave the earth nor are you as tall as the mountains". Surah Isra (17:37).
Ya Allah don't take my soul away until you are happy with me:
Ya Allah give me a death of a shaheed.
Ya Allah let the last words of my life be the Shahadah.
Ya Allah If I die in my sleep let My heart beat the Zikr of Allah.
Oh Allah, the guider of the lost soul forgive the entire Muslim Ummah!
Ya Allah Forgive my Parents, my Family, my Muslim Friends. Ameen Ya Rabb
Ameen!
Ameen
ALLAHUmma ameen
I often try to understand the problem pseudosalafis have with philosophy and for most part I notice they make the claim that philosophy aside from using foreign words and explanations, it is difficult for people to understand and supposably Aqidah is simple and straightforward. This to me is very strange of a stance. The argument Hijab has several times mentioned is that even Ibn taymiyyah supported complex and detailed explanation because it is what some people find fulfilling. You see, the same can be said about any subject in Islamic sciences, laypeople wouldn't care about usulul Fiqhi or scrutiny details of analyzing Hadith and so forth because it is all difficult and complicated, they would want just the ruling or the Hadith. That doesn't make the sciences less true, necessary or profound. The same is with philosophy and rational exhaustion in abstract concepts. If pseudosalafis cannot fathom such issues, they better chill than going around making things Haram.
@@12HR818 hey crosstian first of all tell your coward princess to come out of her mums drawer 😂😂
@@12HR818 then watch this how coward princess fool's the fools like you with paid callers lol th-cam.com/video/FnzuR6bxU6Y/w-d-xo.html
@@ABUBAKRABU-o1s which philosophers?
@@12HR818 shut up. People like you and cp are not worthy of anyone’s time. Grow up and start taking your salvation seriously. This is like asking hitler to share Judaism. Your manchild who talks behind a screen of anonymity is more than welcome to come to speakers corner or join an efdawah stream
@@ABUBAKRABU-o1s the sufist?
Some wrote in the commentaries that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) invited atheists to Islam and that, therefore, scientific logic and philosophy are not necessary in calling to Islam. However, many of the people have confused former infidels with Darwinian atheists which are two different groups of infidels. Historically, from an Islamic perspective, there have always been (ideologically) two groups of people, believers and non-believers. Believers are those who obey Allah and His Messengers and this has been the case throughout history. There are many types of unbelievers, but they were divided into two groups. The first group of disbelievers are those who have not denied the existence of Allah but have opposed Allah and His Messengers by refusing obedience. The first of these is Iblis, the accursed Satan who became arrogant and refused Allah's command to to bow to Adam and thus became an unbeliever. All those who in any way reject obedience to Allah and His Messengers while at the same time affirming the existence of Allah are disbelievers. If they also fight against the truth, then the unbelievers are like a damn devil. The basis of this unbelief is the arrogance and envy that lead people and jinn to disobedience, rejection and ultimately to hostility towards believers. Another type of unbelievers are polytheists who believe in the existence of multiple gods. They are also divided into several types, but there are basically two. The first kind are those who believe that Allah exists and that He is the Creator and the main God but that there are gods beside Him, His partners who have a share in power and whom people worship expecting some benefit from them such as protection, provision or simply bringing them closer to Allah. This kind of unbelievers were Arabs in the time of the Prophet 'alaihis-salam'. The second type of polytheists are those who do not believe in Allah but believe in the existence of other gods such as the ancient Greek, Roman or Egyptian polytheists who had their own gods, completely independent of Allah.This group includes today's Hindus who do not believe in the existence of Allah but also believe in many other deities. Today, however, a new kind of unbelievers has emerged and they are atheists. Atheists are people who completely deny the existence of any kind of deity. They deny creationism and that man was created by creation but believe in the "accidental" or natural origin of life and its evolution from one cell to today's man. These people believe that the whole universe came into being out of nothing. This kind of unbelievers did not exist in the time of the Prophet 'alaihis-salam'. The approach to calling people to the right path depends on which group of unbelievers they belong to. It is not the same to call to the right path Jews, Christians, polytheists or atheists who deny the existence of God. There are separate arguments for each of these groups. Some need proof that the Quran is from Allah and that it is a revelation to follow. Some polytheists need proof of the absurdity of having multiple gods, while to many people today, the existence of God must be proved and that man was created by creation. These people demand three pieces of evidence. The first is that there is a God, second is that Allah is That God and that He deserves to be worshiped and the third is that Muhammad 'alaihis-salam' is the Messenger of Allah.
Hi- cool comment. As a former agnostic atheist, I have to weigh in here. The reality is atheists are not always as rational as they portray themselves to be. Maybe they started out sincere but it's often not the case for too long. If all they needed was a sound proof of God's existence and then logical deductions about who that God is and then prophets etc, alayhim asalaam, then I would see your point. However this is not how it works the majority of the time; their hearts are hardened by kufr and following their desires for so long and they are often dismissive when it comes to seeking the truth.
My view on this would be that in dealing with new-age-atheists there are plenty of much stronger pieces of artillery we need to use before we even think about the contingency argument. As Mufti Muneer says, the cup needs to be emptied before clean water goes into it. They need to hear why the multiverse theory is not a valid scientific theory, why science is not a means to obtaining absolute truth, how skepticism is a contradictory standpoint when taken to its logical end and other issues with their thoughts.
So in essence my view is that a very powerful thing to do is to simply learn their belief system ie all of their idols' claims to belittle the existence of a God and refute it by showing its internal consistencies. Once that is done, they should be exposed to the rational proofs of Islam such as the preservation of the religion, the many prophecies which have been proven, the moral and legislative consistency and perfection of the religion, and even statistical examples from past and present models of orthodox Islam which have shown to provide society with the best means of living in a society.
I am not in a position to say that one should never use the contingency argument, however I do have to say I find the above approach much more enlightening and successful from my point of view.
SalAllahu ala nabiyyina Muhammad
Good input brothers. BarakAllahu feekum
yakhi, we NEED more content like this. Stay humble & may Allah forgive your sins.
1 - Whoever says SubhanAllahi wa biHamdihi (Glory be to Allah and Praise Him) a hundred times during the day, his sins are wiped away, even if they are like the foam of the sea [Sahih al-Bukhari; #7:168, Sahih Muslim; #4:2071]
2 - whoever says SubhanAllahi wa biHamdihi, Subhan-Allahi 'l-`adheem (Glory be to Allah, and Praise, Glory be to Allah, the Supreme)
Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) said: "Two words are light on the tongue, weigh heavily in the balance, they are loved by the Most Merciful One " [Sahih al-Bukhari; #7:67, Sahih Muslim, #4:2071]
سبحان الله وبحمده سبحان الله العظيم ❤
If you take away the name, and just bring the statement, they'd probably say he was a deviant
Aslam alaikum Hijab!
You are doing well, may Allah reward you abundantly. Amin
I can see you have some information about Nigeria and that's great. I watched a TH-cam video "opposing views - Islam: The end of Europe and I was relieved in the way you gave a strong befitting analysis to same questions answered by Ayaan Hirsi.
I watched the video actually not because of you but because of the misconception she gave in one TH-cam video I watched "Islam is a religion of peace" in which she opposed.
Additionally, I am glad you did another analysis giving her fitting answer to some of her wrong claims.
Most of the Salafi Madkhalis of West London that I remember of 10 years ago have grown up and moved on. They're either completely of deen or have joined the mainstream Sunni Muslims. Shamsi and Jamal are the only ones still on that narrow worldview. Their followers typically fizzle out or grow up (you can't get much done in life obsessively hating on other people), while a very, very small handful cling to their narrow world view they end up becoming increasingly irrelevant and outright laughing stocks. Speakers corner is the only thing keeping Shamsi relevant!
Salafism isn't the answer, it's so mislead.
@Turkish Salafi
Hijab is not deceptive at all, he makes a lot of sense. He's educated and debated with many people about Islam.
Facts
true, their cultish behaviour is the reason I incline to the mainstream orthodoxy more nowadays.
The prophet never used greek philosophy in dawah so stop using it to impress people we're not here to impress we should directly refer to the Quran and Sunnah like all the companions did. Philosophy in dawah is not something of this deen.
very measured, very logical and it leaves no doubt. just evidence no feelings . great Job Akhi
Sheikh Abul Feda’s detailed refutation of the points brought up in the video: th-cam.com/video/e9jwa5Qs9Ck/w-d-xo.html
*Difference between islam and christianity*
*Jesus:* was sinless and said _"love your enemies"_
*The pedophet:* violated each and every commandment at least three times each to be sure and he said _"slaughter and enslave all the christians"_
He didn’t refute the use of logic only the presupposition of a philosophical world view but that’s nonsense and most Salafis believe Ibn Taymiyya had an axiomatic one
oh
Ash-Shaafi'i said: "My judgment concerning
Kalaam theologians is that they should be taken
around the community and beaten with palm
branches and slippers and it will be said to them: this is the punishment for leaving the Words of Allah and the words of the Messenger of Allah, sallallaahu 'alayhi wa sallam."
Mohammed Hijab you are a disingenuous individual especially as you want to use Ibn Taymiyyah RH to back up your claims as some sort of authority but previously disregarded him and belittled him. You can't have your cake and eat it.
Hijab you know what you’re doing is insincere and falsehood. The difference between ibn
taymiyyah RH and people of your ilk is that he
heard the arguments of the people of kalam and showed their error in their arguments l.e refuted their baatil and foolishness whilst you use kalam to prove Allahs existence and support your claims.
That is not the same. Ibn taymiyyah RH never
used kalam to prove Allahs existence or
attributes. You are a liar and you should fear Allah swt.
th-cam.com/video/10cvFb14IfY/w-d-xo.html
We do not need Ibn Taymiyyah to verify the permissibility of using rational arguements.we have a rich tradition of scholars who are ashari and maturidi like ibn hajar al asqallani,al baqillani,fakhar uddin ar razi,imam taftazani, imam alah uddin bukhari, imam bazdawi,imam nasafi,imam gazzali and so on.they were using quran, sunnah and logic in a balanced way to explain aqeedah.so called salafis can not just say that they are all deviant. They do not even read the quran carefully.Allah swt, he himself gave a lots of arguements and ispired us to think, to understand, so that we can know him. It is a ridiculous statement by the salafis.we need to know one thing that salafi aqeedah is not the aqeedah of the salaf.every deviant group gives evidence from quran and sunnah but they are devient, because they do not want to understand the meaning of the verse in the way that is indicated
Asharis and maturidis are grave worshipping innovators. Their only supporters are Pakistanis, Turkish, and Bosnians who cant get rid of their cultural baggage and acknowledge their ancestors were wrong. And I say this as a Bosnian who acknowledges that they were wrong. Alhamdullilahah im not a grave worshipping innovator. May Allah protect all Muslims from those things. Btw Muhammad Hijab is athari.
He is trying to respond tbe the pseudo-salafis, they take ibn taimiyah as an authority.
allah is not everywhere
The thing is Ibn Taymiyyah had very good critiques of the asha'ira while not totally dismissing the intellect. It's not an extreme in either way (scripture/reason) even though he was athari.
6'5'' Hijab is 7' with that hat.
Lol
@Etienne Newell Nothing to do with Islam. It's a comment. Banter. We Muslim do that too. Surprise.
@Etienne Newell I don't consider myself a liberal, and I live in a country that has its legal system based upon shariah. Yep, still bantering around with my mates about football at the moment. Wanna join?
Bigger lion = louder roar
@Etienne Newell
What the hell is a liberal Muslim? A part-time "Muslim?"
Someone who picks and chooses what to follow or what their secular liberal masters have decided they can follow?
followers of "pure" islam looking up to mubtadi ibn taymiyya 🙄 it's best to ignore these people because even if ibn taymiyya was a hardcore philosopher they would say "the shaikh was not infallible" or "he repented in his death bed" etc.
They’re just extremists like the khawarij were. The Prophet pbuh warned us of people like the neo salafis.
Ibn taymiyyah actually did repent. Wonder what wahabis have to say about this!
@@mughal_r9374 "w*ahabis don't exist" 🤪
@@trappedinexistence “tHerEs NO sUch ThiNG AS WahaBI”
“WHO caLLS tHemSeLVeS WahaBI?”
@@mughal_r9374 where is the evidence for when he repented?
Also what did he repent for?
Are you aware of the many misguided innovations and mind boggling statements of his?
Specifically Anthropomorphism and Likening Allah Almighty to creation using symbolism and figurative speech
In the you'll realize that in this world nobody will ever concede that his intelligence is lower than somebody else's cause the existence of ego. However leading by example might be more beneficial specifically to its nature of piercing the ego and affect the personal unconscious directly. I sincerely believe the order of the ayah ud'u ila sabili rabbika pointed out how to deliver the message in the sense that hikmah doesn't necessarily involve contest of knowledge, but by being examplary according to the audience and the circumstances. May Allah keeps us united on the straight path
@John Wayne well I've never been bothered to tamper anything on my profile since I got it. Maybe I should comform and do it already huh
@@mutamirmukhzani1240 Nothing wrong with your profile photo bro. Dont litsen to this guy
@John Wayne Please enlighten me where the prophet said you cant make an angry face. ''possession of exemplary conduct'' please explain where his profile picture not exemplary and I dont care about your oppinion respectfully but only the prophet (AS) so give me an example from him.
I don’t know if Imaam Shaafi’i is considered a “pseudo salafi” but he put it brilliantly may Allaah have mercy on him: "My judgment concerning Kalaam theologians is that they should be taken around the community and beaten with palm branches and slippers and it will be said to them: this is the punishment for leaving the Words of Allaah and the words of the Messenger of Allaah, sallallaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam."
Imam Ash Shaafi was not referring to the Ashari mutakalimeen who were not present at the time. Ash Shaafi position is in reference to the Muthazilites and Jahmiyya.
@@mohamedshah5418
Ashariyyah and Maturidiyyah are both based on ilm ul Kalam.
I have never seen; unless DawahMan is considered amongst them, the group of detractors, ever call to Islam publicly much less engage non Muslims in any type of dialogue. May Allah keep you on the straight path and forgive your shortcomings, and allow you to benefit us with beneficial knowledge.
Search a channel called, "One Message Foundation" with Uthman Ibn Farooq who is against Kalam.
Think of me as a layman. I don't know which side is right, but I gave you the information.
@@everythingandroidois Sheikh Uthman is very respectful. He doesn't pounce on others like Shamsi gang. He is minding his own business.
Dawahman used to call to Islam publicly, he basically invented modern TH-cam street dawah
Ramadan always comes at the right time! 👌🏻🌺 O Allah Help me in it to fast and to pray as it is worth, help me avoid its slips and sins, and grant me in it to continuously remember You with Your enabling, O One Who guides those who stray.. And Make my tongue remember You constantly and my heart enthralled by Your love! Ramadan always comes at the right time, and on its exact time.. It comes and life has completely exhausted us
And our dreams exhausted us We have reached the end of tired running. He comes and the days have sucked our souls until we vanish completely. He comes to replace sadness with joy, pain with hope, and unhappiness with happiness He comes to rescue her from the pressures of life and rebuild us after our worries have destroyed us 🌙💛
duaa for Ramadan 🤲❤️
O Allah, we seek Your help and we seek Your forgiveness. We attribute all goodness to You. We are grateful to You and refuse to be ungrateful to You; we abandon and forsake all those who reject You. O Allah, You alone we worship, to You alone we pray; to You alone we prostrate, and for You alone we strive; and to You alone we flee for refuge. We hope in Your mercy and we fear Your retribution. Verily, Your punishment is bound to catch up with those who reject the truth. O Allah, do not let worldly affairs (dunya) be our principal concern nor the ultimate limit of our knowledge; do not make the Fire our abode, and make, O Allah, Paradise our home and final dwelling place, by Your Mercy, O Most Merciful of those who show mercy.
💛🌙
Abdools,
Christian Prince is going live today in 1.5 hours. 10:30 am NEW YORK TIME.
PLEASE COME DEFEND ISLAM.
@@12HR818 ask Christian prince to come and debate Mohammed Hijab or Zakir Naik... Not the other way round
@@12HR818 You start with an insult. And this must be an invitation to debate Christian Prince. We have better things to do. For those who want to hear the truth let them come to us. If you don't want to hear the truth. Well, than you are the one who is losing.
@@محمدبريداوي an insult? Aren’t you an Abdul to allah?
@@12HR818 Don't play dumb with me. You didn't use the word Abdools in a respectable manner. We all know that Abdool is used to make fun of muslims. I never have seen muslims use this word in the way you use it.
If you want to value any product (in your case, philosophy) understand its purpose firt. If its purpose is justified just use 'cost and benefit' method.
Every product has its advantages and disadvantages. Thats what i use and it works everytime.
Hijab brother It's refreshing to see you in a serious manner.please don't over do the comedy bits.it could water down your serious work
Using the Qur'an and the Sunnah wouldn't be anyway controversial as using the so-called contingency argument would be. Allah didn't send ibn Taymiyya to us as a prophet. The fact that those who are using such an argument tend to deny the attributes of Allah is a enough a reason to steer clear of such a perspective in Dawah. May Allah keep us on the right path.
so if someone used quran to blow himself up
we should not use quran ?
wow just wow
If you believe in attributes that contradictory so you believe in contradiction then it can be allah exist and doesn't exist in the same time
But because allah doesn't say to you he doesn't exist so you don't believe in that
Oooh mad people your thinking is ridiculous
Just because Ibn Taimiyah wrote about contingency argument doesn't mean he was suggesting to use that argument in dawah, and was saying disbelievers must be given Dawah using contingency argument and not with Qur'an as they don't believe in Quran. This was the point of br Saajid. He didn't say contingency argument doesn't exist, or is wrong, but he said those who think disbelievers must be given Dawah using contingency argument and cannot be given Dawah using Quran are making a mistake. Now if that's your stand point, then refute him and prove how your standpoint is correct. And if that's not your standpoint, then announce as such. In a nutshell, this is not a proper reply to br Saajid, and it's completely off track.
@XER-Islam did the prophet not give dawah to the atheists, and did he use contingency argument when doing so? Did the sahaba use it? Did any of the early scholars of Islam use it? If they didn't need it, and they are the best Muslims, we are better off not using it to give dawah to the atheists.
@@missilemahmood but the atheist of today don’t want to hear about Quran and Sunnah until u establish that there is a necessary being. I really don’t understand y this is a problem when giving dawah. If I make a person understand that there is a necessary being, then u can establish whether or not the creator communicated to his creation. Then sunnah and Quran is brought in leaving the person without any doubt there is a creator and has communicated with us.
@XER-Islam The prohibition is more than clear for those who know, or those who at lease want to know.
@@MThre3 atheists and disbelievers of the past also didn't want to listen to the Quran. They would literally cover their ears with their hands when they would walk past someone reciting Quran.
@@missilemahmood Allah's knowledge is VAST and INFINITE (Quran 18, Verse 109), just because the Prophet didnt use the contingency argument doesnt mean that its not a valid and solid argument.
Love to watch to tour videos, good argument and a calm attitude.
Salaam from the Netherlands
They Blessed you with a Nigerian Attire Ma Sha Allah…Suits you Mr Hijab!!
Love from Nigeria❤
May Allah bless you akhi....
قال ابن القيّمِ رحمه الله :
“ولا يَستقِرُّ للعبدِ قدَمٌ في الإسلامِ حتّى يَعقِدَ قلبَه وسِرَّهُ عَلى أنّ الدِّيـــنَ كُـلَّـه للهِ لا ربَّ سِــواهُ ولا مَتبوعَ غيرُه، وأنّ كلامَ غَيرِه يُعرَضُ على كلامِه، فإِن وافَـقَـه قبِـلـنـاه …وإن خالفه رددناه”.
الصواعق المرسلة ٣٠٩/١
Ibn alqyeam said in book of sawaeq almorslah 309/1 :
“And know that it is not established that the servant has set foot in Islam until he holds his heart to the fact that the religion is all for God, that guidance is God’s guidance, that the truth revolves with the Messenger of God, existence and non-existence, and that no one else is obeyed and no one else is followed, and that the words of others are presented to his words, and if it agrees with it, we accept it... and if it is against it, we don’t accept it”
As soon as I saw the thumbnail I KNEW you got that hat from my homeland 😂😂
My criticism of using Ibn Taymiyyah as a source is that he is NOT RELIABLE to me (ثقة) when it comes to his generalizations about what constitute the madhhab of the salaf, and especially his propensity to declare any position he adopts as being one that has the consensus of Ahlus Sunnah scholars (إجماع), which is not true, because by doing so he casually dismisses many Sunni scholars that have different opinions, and the blind followers like the Madkhalis don't have the wherewithal nor the will to double-check his claims of Ijma'. They just take his claims at face value. Still, if the Madkhalis were to take THE TOTALITY of his opinions and follow them blindly, that would still be acceptable, but the BinSaud mafia puts a filter on Ibn Taymiyyah's Fiqh and Aqeedah, and they pick and choose what the Madkhalis will then follow.
@@Uthopemus strawman.
There are lotta people who dont agree with ibn taymiyyah
But there is no reason to write this statement.. especially on youtube comment section. Just gonna make people argue..
If you comment something like this on a channel who don't agree with ibn taymiyyah that makes sense,
But if you do it on a channel who takes from ibn taymiyyah.. it's unwise
And there are no scholars that are perfectly reliable.. and what do u mean by reliable
Your "criticism" on this great scholar hahahahahaha, who are you even? a nobody. So we all due respect, please keep your "criticism" to yourself as it holds no value in the Islamic world.
Ibn taymia is not our prophet but he is one of the greatest ahlusunnah scholars.
Of course he is a human and he errors, but his errors are small, and therefore he demands respect if you're main stream ahlusunnah and not extreme shia or suufi
@@YMe-hp7hi well said
A salafi would argue with himself if he doesn't find anyone to argue with
@Check proofs of Islam in my playlists he was a hanbali a salafi didn't exist then .. the salaf are the first 3 generations
The problem to be honest not because I have something wrong with sajed but I have problem with him graduated from madina university not knowing this!!
From what Ive heard graduating in madinah is literally just learning to recite quran, its not a comprehensive education at all.
@@rijadhadzic3396 no, there are many Islamic studies in Madinah university but Sajid seems only just studied Arabic and Quran.
I am Nigerian and i feel so proud😊😊☺☺
I was also thinking about this and maybe even making a video on this. I feel like using philosophy in dawah is the same thing as Muslims who use christianity (The Bible) against Christians. Your just using their methodology against themselves in order to provide an argument for our methodology. Using philosophy and that way of thinking to prove islam against people who use philosophy is the same thing (imo lol). Very interesting what ibn taymiyyah said though.
Sheikh Abul Feda’s detailed refutation of the points brought up in the video: th-cam.com/video/e9jwa5Qs9Ck/w-d-xo.html
@@Moath1277 he didn’t refute the points made here. He is saying don’t use philosophy to understand the deen but you can use philosophy to go against atheism.
@@petritkola brother, the video is more than an hour long and you replied in 20 mins..
Please watch the video then reply
@@petritkola Hypothetically, let's assume what you're saying is right. Is it not unhealthy for your heart to do da'wah with philosophy as your imaan will (unwillingly) be (partly or fully, 'audhu billah) reliant/based on them? Are you not training your own heart to base your own imaan on philosophical argumentation instead of actual 'ilm? Investing those hours to think like them, study their books, their way of thinking. Do you really think it won't infect your heart? It's different from studying the Bible because the line is clearly drawn between haqq and baatil (I.e., Quran vs Bible) while philosophy has a gray area because you accept to argue within the concepts laid forward and work within them, using Islamic concepts within the philosophical framework. So much so, that you will truly have to (start to) believe the rationalization/conversion of Islamic concepts to/within the philosophical framework. What will your heart do when you lose a debate defending Islam based on philosophy instead of 'ilm (which will never make you fall short)? It can't be as simple as "just losing a battle". I'm a nobody but in my opinion doing da'wah or debating with philosophy for Islam is a trap (in disguise) and may form the other party's understanding of Islam within their framework instead of Islam's own framework which it deserves. Just some food for thought/naseeha from one brother to another on a late Saturday :D
@@alfarq hahah I appreciate the Saturday (well Sunday here in madinah) advice. I get you, I think my thing is only those who have a good understanding of the deen and aqeedah should partake in it and not everyone should. But if there are some people who know Islam really well, are fully grounded in the proper aqeedah, and have a good teacher who can help them understand where the line should be drawn, then it wouldn’t be too bad Inshallah. That’s my opinion but I get what your saying
Brother Hijab, I know you r a big fan of Khamzat. Hopefully, he wins tonight inshallah.
Ameen
@@abdullahahmad9300 MMA is haram. You’re saying InShaaAllah to haram things 🤦🏽♂️
@Mosaab نعم هو wishing ill on a fellow Muslim is haram. Shame on u.
@@Zzz-rm7zv I didn't say In sha Allah
I said Ameen
Ahahahah
It is haram sport but lets hope through other things he can be instrumental to islam. Sometimes Allah uses a sinner to assist islam. -hadith in sahih muslim كما قال
dont forget ibn taymiyyah got ghazali allllll wrong but LOVED using his arguments
respect the Hujjat al-Islam - and no Sina did a great job for the contingency argument but he got way into philosophy in some deviant ways - instead it was GHAZALI who mastered the kalam cosmological argument - read Iqtisad and then read the tahafut al falasfia where he brilliantly kept theology within shariah to prove the deviant ways of philosopher’s misconstrued and wrong, like sina - saying the world always exsisted with Allah (swt) etc…. smh
Hijab I know u have a large “salafi” following but one of you finally need to give Ghazali credit - because I know you respect the heck out of him but barely bring him up - The great an-nawawi said if ALL scholarly books become lost but the ihya ulum ad-din survived, Islam would survive (he meant other than the beautiful Quran of course)
WAS A MASTER IN USUL AL FIQH (some say the greatest ever…read the Mustafa…), THEOLOGY, PHILOSOPHY WITHIN THE BOUNDS OF THE SHARIAH, KALAM, etc …. the only thing he was not strong in was Hadith sciences but he finally AFTER ALL THE OTHER STUDYING began studying hadith - hence why is last works had all sahih hadith - the imam was one in a million
If any one believe that common sense (laws of reason) doesn't apply to allah or any thing then you are mad
so if atheist says to you that the Qur'an have a contradiction don't defend
I don’t know what this guy Is on about, but he Is spitting straight facts.
There is basically a internal conflict upon this matter as is this ilm al kalam or not
Lol
Ash-Shaafi'i said: "My judgment concerning
Kalaam theologians is that they should be taken
around the community and beaten with palm
branches and slippers and it will be said to them: this is the punishment for leaving the Words of Allah and the words of the Messenger of Allah, sallallaahu 'alayhi wa sallam."
Mohammed Hijab you are a disingenuous individual especially as you want to use Ibn Taymiyyah RH to back up your claims as some sort of authority but previously disregarded him and belittled him. You can't have your cake and eat it.
Hijab you know what you’re doing is insincere and falsehood. The difference between ibn
taymiyyah RH and people of your ilk is that he
heard the arguments of the people of kalam and showed their error in their arguments l.e refuted their baatil and foolishness whilst you use kalam to prove Allahs existence and support your claims.
That is not the same. Ibn taymiyyah RH never
used kalam to prove Allahs existence or
attributes. You are a liar and you should fear Allah swt.
th-cam.com/video/10cvFb14IfY/w-d-xo.html
@@soulunknown1 It's a good thing we're not talking about the same kalam then. Ahmed bin Hanbal (RH) used philosophy in his arguments against the mutazila, you have no understanding of anything and have no business discussing it until you do.
Lol 😂
❤️ This is what paradise will look like. In my latest 2min Video you will learn how Paradise is described.
okay
alright
thanks
❤❤
i will
Good work on the book. I would recommend it! Also good job by Hijab and co for providing the paperbacks for a very low cost, so no excuse. Go out and buy!
The contingency argument can only be used by people who accept the doctrine of divine simplicity.
1)
If you say attributes are distinct from the essence you have contradicted the contingency argument
There has to be a first component in the chain
Once a distinction between attributes and essence is made, one must be contingent and the other can’t, if the essence is necessary then it wouldn’t have the attributes. If the attributes were necessary you wouldn’t have the essence. If you disagree with this you disagree with the contingency argument itself.
The only way to get out of this is to affirm the attributes are identical to the essence.
2)
All parts of a whole must have a finite quality to distinguish one part from another. There must be some sort of limitation for a part to be distinguishable from other parts. If God is composed of finite attributes that aren’t other than Him yet not identical then He has a finite nature. If He’s finite, then He’s not a necessary being.
I would just like to add that I’ve seen more of the video and ibn taymiyyah claims the attributes of god are necessary so going back to what I said, if the attributes of god are necessary then the essence is not since you can’t have 2 necessary things according to the contingency argument. If the attributes are necessary then the essence itself would never exist.
Ash-Shaafi'i said: "My judgment concerning
Kalaam theologians is that they should be taken
around the community and beaten with palm
branches and slippers and it will be said to them: this is the punishment for leaving the Words of Allah and the words of the Messenger of Allah, sallallaahu 'alayhi wa sallam."
Mohammed Hijab you are a disingenuous individual especially as you want to use Ibn Taymiyyah RH to back up your claims as some sort of authority but previously disregarded him and belittled him. You can't have your cake and eat it.
Hijab you know what you’re doing is insincere and falsehood. The difference between ibn
taymiyyah RH and people of your ilk is that he
heard the arguments of the people of kalam and showed their error in their arguments l.e refuted their baatil and foolishness whilst you use kalam to prove Allahs existence and support your claims.
That is not the same. Ibn taymiyyah RH never
used kalam to prove Allahs existence or
attributes. You are a liar and you should fear Allah swt.
th-cam.com/video/10cvFb14IfY/w-d-xo.html
No it can’t only be used by those who accept ADS as we don’t believe the attributes can be separated from Allah or that He is like a Lego piece (nauzibillah)
Any ADS clown who thinks this is straw-manning our beliefs. Mohammed Hijabs approach to this in that using the word piece in place of part to avoid confusion is a good thing.
@@MrTrialandError you didn’t address what I said, all you have done is denied it
This hat is used everywhere in west central Africa, it's a hausa fulani hat
Lol. The hat is called zanna bukar. And was fashioned originally by the kanuri people of the north-east. Who also btw introduced Islam to Nigeria
Introduced islam to nigeria would mean they were muslim slave-traders?
Hijab looks like a African king haha
52:35
أَمْ خُلِقُوا۟ مِنْ غَيْرِ شَىْءٍ أَمْ هُمُ ٱلْخَـٰلِقُونَ ٣٥
Or were they created by nothing, or are they ˹their own˺ creator?
- Dr. Mustafa Khattab, the Clear Quran
Assalamu alaykum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatu. Hope you and your family are okay. Ramadan Mubarak
This is exactly why we should learn Arabic. As long as we're ignorant of knowledge in Arabic books, we will constantly bicker amongst ourselves. Maybe these pseudo salafis should learn the language first.
If you delete all of your videos and start reciting Quran, they will make videos against you. For they are jealous. Period.
"If you delete all of your videos and start reciting Quran"
So, are you admitting reciting Quran would be better than what he is doing right now?
@@liquidphilosopher1816 I don't know what you're smoking to come to this conclusion.
the problem with muslims is when an ignoramous/students start critiquing the scholars….if our ancestors ulama developed Kalam to respond to Hellenic Philosophy, it is even more important for our contemporary ulama to respond to the current Western Philosophy using Kalam and its derivatives
Ash-Shaafi'i said: "My judgment concerning
Kalaam theologians is that they should be taken
around the community and beaten with palm
branches and slippers and it will be said to them: this is the punishment for leaving the Words of Allah and the words of the Messenger of Allah, sallallaahu 'alayhi wa sallam."
Mohammed Hijab you are a disingenuous individual especially as you want to use Ibn Taymiyyah RH to back up your claims as some sort of authority but previously disregarded him and belittled him. You can't have your cake and eat it.
Hijab you know what you’re doing is insincere and falsehood. The difference between ibn
taymiyyah RH and people of your ilk is that he
heard the arguments of the people of kalam and showed their error in their arguments l.e refuted their baatil and foolishness whilst you use kalam to prove Allahs existence and support your claims.
That is not the same. Ibn taymiyyah RH never
used kalam to prove Allahs existence or
attributes. You are a liar and you should fear Allah swt.
th-cam.com/video/10cvFb14IfY/w-d-xo.html
@@soulunknown1 😢
The Cap made me click. I'm from Nigeria.
Need to understand that alot of scholars were also misguided at the beginning, e.g. Al-Ghazali made tawba and accepted the Manhaj of Imam Ahmad, Imam Ahmad was following Ahlul Sunnah afaik and Ghazali died like this.
Oh here we go again lol. No proof , just empty claims
I am a Muslim Shia brother and I applaud your great improvement in Arabic. You grew up in the west so we gotta give credit where its due. I have seen your Arabic evolve substantially. Good job my dear brother in Islam👏👏
No such thing as a Shia Muslim
@@soulunknown1 yes there is and its the second most followed "sect" in islam cos theres millions who follow shia islam . we cannot deny realitu
@@mumin9436 there are no sects of Islam… we don’t do sects so ascribing yourself to one shows there’s no such thing. People ascribing to sects are in the fire 🔥👍🏾
@@soulunknown1 u cannot find "sects" in books of religion....sects is formed when there is difference of opinion and group splits...muslims all around the world follow different ideologies/sects within islam . there are thousands of diff ideologies/sects within islam that was born in the past 1400 years . saying again. You cant deny reality. There is no one single entity thats "official" islam
@@mumin9436 Then you deny the messenger you claim to follow..
The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) stood among us and said: “Those who came before you of the people of the Book split into seventy-two sects, and this ummah will split into seventy-three: seventy-two in Hell and one in Paradise, and that is the jamaa’ah (main body of Muslims).”
May Allah swt unite the Muslims, with a sound part amongst them that accept the fact and right that there may be differences of opinion based upon legal evidence from our sources, Qur'an, Sunnah, Idjma'a Sahabah and Qiyas.
Like how there is a consensus and sound understanding on the 4 Madhabs, which are accepted with their differences.
May we learn to appreciate the vast wealth that a legal (valid) broad spectrum brings and how it is a mechanism that enables and underscores the practical capability of Islam to adress all aspects of human life, whatever we may encounter in regards to actions and things, whenever or where ever we may be. For the Deen is complete and Legislator has not left a single issue without a Hukm.
Ash-Shaafi'i said: "My judgment concerning
Kalaam theologians is that they should be taken
around the community and beaten with palm
branches and slippers and it will be said to them: this is the punishment for leaving the Words of Allah and the words of the Messenger of Allah, sallallaahu 'alayhi wa sallam."
Mohammed Hijab you are a disingenuous individual especially as you want to use Ibn Taymiyyah RH to back up your claims as some sort of authority but previously disregarded him and belittled him. You can't have your cake and eat it.
Hijab you know what you’re doing is insincere and falsehood. The difference between ibn
taymiyyah RH and people of your ilk is that he
heard the arguments of the people of kalam and showed their error in their arguments l.e refuted their baatil and foolishness whilst you use kalam to prove Allahs existence and support your claims.
That is not the same. Ibn taymiyyah RH never
used kalam to prove Allahs existence or
attributes. You are a liar and you should fear Allah swt.
th-cam.com/video/10cvFb14IfY/w-d-xo.html
You linked a different book, "The deception of the new atheist"(which I will also be reading by the way 😂, let me know if that is not free) not the Burhan, please update the link, Jazakumulah khairan
A true representation of the Ayah in the Quran "Muḥammad is the Messenger of Allah. And those with him are firm with the disbelievers1 and compassionate with one another. You see them bowing and prostrating2 ˹in prayer˺, seeking Allah’s bounty and pleasure. The sign ˹of brightness can be seen˺ on their faces from the trace of prostrating ˹in prayer˺. This is their description in the Torah.3 And their parable in the Gospel is that of a seed that sprouts its ˹tiny˺ branches, making it strong. Then it becomes thick, standing firmly on its stem, to the delight of the planters4-in this way Allah makes the believers a source of dismay for the disbelievers.5 To those of them who believe and do good, Allah has promised forgiveness and a great reward." Al Fath, 29. Love your calmness with the Muslim brothers
Referencing and fact checking is absolutely spot on. Great reply
Wow , so muhammad hijab can't actually defend the contradiction between the contingency argument and the hadiths and verses of allah's attributes? He can only resort to indirect "tu quoque" whataboutism by basically saying " well if there's a contradiction then ibn taymiyya is making the same error " . That isn't a defence, that's just dragging someone else into error with you. To try and make the problem go away by asserting that the attributes of allah , the body parts of allah for example, are necessary is plainly just untrue and unconvincing. How can you say it's necessary for allah to have the body part of a shin? where is the contradiction in allah not having a shin? to say something is necessary is to say that it is impossible to be otherwise. muhammad hijab himself gave the example that it would be ridiculous to say that a man having a moustache or wearing a hat is necesessay since there clearly is no contradiction to a man not having a moustache or a hat and so it's not impossible to be otherwise, and so not necessary. But clearly the same goes for allah having 2 right hands (why not only 1 hand? what would be impossible or logically contradictory about that? nothing) or a shin, or palms and fingers or any of the other body parts in hadith. OR even if you ignore this and just dogmatically assert to yourself that such body parts are necessary without reason, What about the hadith of allah descending into the lowest heaven every night or putting his foot into hell? that shows that allah has a position and this position changes. Clearly if his position is changing that means that it is possible for his position to be otherwise and so it is not necessary . How is any of this befitting of a logically necessary being? a being where it is logically impossible for it to be otherwise? obviously it isn't.
I thought to myself, what is that on his head? ^^
I wanted to watch the video just because of the hat ^^ so funny and stylish. Masha'Allah
These people who are trying to work against hijab do not understand how important his work is for the muslim who grows up in the west.
From very early on we get indoctrinated into the new age atheism paradigm.
Hijab helped me see that that worldview is not the most reasonable worldview to hold and it contains a whole lot of blind faith.
What hijab does is a counterattack to new age atheism.
And these guys are sadly trying to cut him down.
So that despicable beings such as AP then can say “oh look even the muslims are against hojab on this”.
Im sorry to say to these so called paeudo salafis.
But i cant just have faith like a christian does despite the contradictions.
I need reasons built up from the ground.
Love from Nigeria ❤
Is this in response to Sajid Lipman?
On my journey back to you Allah insha'Allah we all get to jannah 🤲🏻
But you are Liverpool fans
@@adonis9568 what do you mean brother?
@@micgreenson7308 nothing
@@adonis9568 ok, You'll never walk alone is our motto.. which is true because Allah is always here for us 🤲🏻❤️
@@micgreenson7308 #YNWA
Ibnu Taymiya used logic and not philosophy.
He used contingency argument which according to Wahabbis is philosophy.
*Proof for logical/philosophical arguments in the Quran.*
In the Qurʾān, Allah Taʿālā tells us:
We shall show them Our signs in every region of the earth and in
themselves, until it becomes clear to them that this is the Truth. [Sūra Fuṣṣilat 53]
This method of logical deduction was the way of all the previous prophets and earlier scholars of this Umma. (See Sūras Hūd 28 and 32, Al-Anʿām 76 to 83, Al-Anbiyā 58, Al-Baqarah 258 and Al-Naḥl 125.) It is Allah’s command that we exercise our intellect in reflecting over His signs in order to repel any
doubts that may arise in the mind. The science of ʿIlm al-Kalām seeks to achieve the same objective.
A group of atheists once approached the great Imām, Abū Ḥanīfa with the intention of killing him. The Imām asked them what they would say about a person who claims that he has seen a ship laden with goods sailing on the sea transporting the goods from one shore to another. The goods are piled onto the ship automatically and are similarly off-loaded by themselves upon reaching their destination. The ship navigates the waves perfectly all by itself with no sailor to steer it. They replied that no sane human would accept such a nonsensical contention. Thereupon the Imām remarked: "Pity upon your intelligence. If a mere ship cannot sail smoothly without a sailor, how then can it be ever possible that this entire universe runs so perfectly without a controller?" Upon hearing this they were utterly embarrassed and immediately accepted Islam at the hands of the Imām. Someone once asked Imām Mālik to provide a proof of the existence of a
Creator. The Imām indicated towards his face and observed that despite the face of man being so small, it consists of two eyes, a nose, two ears, a tongue, cheeks, lips and other parts.
Notwithstanding this, no two persons’ facial features are identical. Likewise the voice, mannerisms, character and habits of every person is unique. This is proof enough that all of this is the work of a Supreme Creator.
@Turkish Salafi Can you show fundamentally how contingency argument prefers aql over naql?!
@Turkish Salafi just saying aristotilian logic isnt sufficient to discount it since knowledge can be sought from non muslims. The Messenger of Allah, ص, said, *“The word of wisdom is the lost property of the believer. Wherever he finds it, he is most deserving of it.”*
Source: Sunan al-Tirmidhī 2687
Grade: Hasan
LIAR. Fear Allah.
@@HatRSol
I gave evidence. Wheres ur evidence that im a liar. *Seeing but they still blind. Shame.*
@Turkish Salafi copy and paste again. Hijab quoted ibn taymiyyah now u reject ur own scholar. *Your finished.*
good thing this video came on my feed...someone needs to send this to saajid lipham
Forget Ibn Taymiyyah the prophet peace be upon him and his companions never used philosohy in dawah just stick to their way !
Assalamu-alaikum.
Just because they didn't do something doesn't mean it's forbidden for us. For example, later generation of Muslims compiled the hadith books, but we know that the prophet and the sahaba never compiled the hadeeth into books. So should we get rid of hadith books??
Then how do u speak to an atheist about Quran and sunnah wen they don’t wat that brought into the argument because they don’t believe in it. But wen u established there is a necessary being, u can they argue whether or not the creator has communicated with his creation or not. The contingency argue opens the door for Quran and sunnah to be explained to the atheist. Mayb if u know of another way to speak to the atheist, please advise us on how that can be done…
@@MThre3 oh you don't think there are arguments for those in the Quran ?? Allah addresses atheists in many many ayahs and asks them to contemplate and think about the origin of the universe. We don't need any other source of dawah than the Quran and Sunnah they're complete you can convince them about the existence of a creator just by these two. Most atheists convert because of reading the Quran and contemplate in it not because of philosophy.
@@gajiburrahman7378 wa alaikum salam brother.
The reason why they didn't comply books of hadith is because they had to use what was available at the time to write quran there wasn't enough material to support writing everything including the hadiths but the main and principal object was to preserve the Quran. Also, there's no means of comparison between that and using philosophy in dawah. All this philosophy brother hijab is talking about was there during the time of sahabas but they didn't use ilm kalam or greek philosophy in Dawah !
@@sarras444 And they didn’t use theophilosophical arguments because they didn’t have a need for it. Just like scientific method. We can use scientific method to explore the world and give dawah.
The truth is philosophy is very dangerous and many fatwas have prohibited studying philosophy except if you are forced to ( like in high school) or for dawaah to non Muslims that use philosophy.
To the general public tho , why use philosophy????
Philosophy does not have limits, there is nothing that it can't question or has not questioned already. When you reference philosophy you implicitly accept it as a way of finding truth , whereas us as Muslims we should stick to the Quran and Sunnah. If a Muslim does not have a solid faith, delving into philosophy might make him or her even leave Islam. Using philosophy with the general public is dangerous. Ibn taymya does not explicitly say "contingency, a theory in philosophy ". He uses logic not philosophy, there is a fine line there. Philosophy is a filed of science now... it is no more just looking for the truth like Socrates defined it. When you reference philosophy to general public you low-key encourage them to read more which is perilous to non-scholars.
May Allah bless you and guide us all towards haq. Love you hijab really as a brother in Islam. Please reconsider.
Also,Sajid obviously only seeks out the truth ,he talks without having any grudge against anyone... the fact he talked about contingency which you obviously cherish doesn't mean he is your enemy. Why call him pseudo-salafi ??
Please check this detailed fatwa on studying philosophy :
islamqa.info/en/answers/88184/ruling-on-studying-philosophy
Superb explanation, if they have humility they will accept this, Insha Allah. ❤
Humility and salafis 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@Ebn_hawwa hijab claims to be a salafi too🤣
@@Ebn_hawwa ahl sunnet w el jame3a . salafist , are same thing , madkhalist are another thing
@@bmc508 these madkhalis are known as salafis in Indo-Pak
@@AlsharifMohammed hijab is hanbali as far I know.
Bless brother each time I’m laughing enjoying and learning may Allah bless you bro I can’t wait to meet you in speakers corner
Salafis pick and choose from whatever scholars agree with them and then they call their way the way of the Salaf
You do realize Mohammed Hijab identifies as a Salafi?
*Pseudo-salafi
@@ruslansheikh4780I would call him more of a Taymiyyan cause he uses a lot Imam Ibn taymiyya’s framework
@@sucatoe bruh that's not a sect
@@KingHawk4385 it’s not a sect, rather it a way to reconcile reason and revelation. Like the way of Imam Ahmad and the way of Imam Ashari,
Ya, the people who keep critiquing philosophy don't even know the basic definition of the term. They clearly conflate philosophy as a whole with Greek or Aristotelianism.
ISLAM was Given to the Prophet
Do ISLAM as the Prophet (sas) did
Do not start innovations
you need to talk to people in dawah in the language and manner they understand it .the prophet was given the quran in arabic that his people can knows it is the truth
Ash-Shaafi'i said: "My judgment concerning
Kalaam theologians is that they should be taken
around the community and beaten with palm
branches and slippers and it will be said to them: this is the punishment for leaving the Words of Allah and the words of the Messenger of Allah, sallallaahu 'alayhi wa sallam."
Mohammed Hijab you are a disingenuous individual especially as you want to use Ibn Taymiyyah RH to back up your claims as some sort of authority but previously disregarded him and belittled him. You can't have your cake and eat it.
Hijab you know what you’re doing is insincere and falsehood. The difference between ibn
taymiyyah RH and people of your ilk is that he
heard the arguments of the people of kalam and showed their error in their arguments l.e refuted their baatil and foolishness whilst you use kalam to prove Allahs existence and support your claims.
That is not the same. Ibn taymiyyah RH never
used kalam to prove Allahs existence or
attributes. You are a liar and you should fear Allah swt.
th-cam.com/video/10cvFb14IfY/w-d-xo.html
Please come to south india brother hijab , we are welcoming you with all our heart ❤️🇮🇳
Please
Accept this brother's request
We can make a big meet up
Tamilnadu??
Dude, Indian Muslims can't defend their women, hijab, mosques etc. Don't invite people and put them in trouble.
❤️
@@muhammadaqeel2203 Karnataka brother
I like the video before I've seen it and I don't follow the stream. This is a rare phenomena, which can be applied to Mohammed hijab videos. Jazakallahkhairan
I've known this for s long time that you can't take knowledge from the salafi because he will only cherry pick statements that back his claim... Rather follow true scholars who have given their entire life for ilm and they have a chain of transmission going back to the prophet... Books alone cannot give knowledge but sitting with true scholars is the sahabi way. ..I call salafis PDF shaykhs
Masha’Allah I see Hijab going somewhere big Insha’Allah. Keep striving Hijab, I see you being remembered if you keep it going in the same pace.
It's enough for me that the prophet never used it in dawah nor his companions they always referred to the Quran and Sunnah. Shouldn't we follow him peace be upon him ? You don't know any better than him or his companions RA
Muhammad Qasin said in another comment which explains it nicely:
Proof for logical/philosophical arguments
in the Quran.
In the Qur'an, Allah Ta'ala tells us:
We shall show them Our signs in every region
of the earth and in
themselves, until it becomes clear to them
that this is the Truth. [Süra Fussilat 53]
This method of logical deduction was the way
of all the previous prophets and earlier
scholars of this Umma. (See Suras Hüd 28
and 32, Al-Anâm 76 to 83, Al-Anbiyâ 58, Al-
Baqarah 258 and Al-Nahl 125.) It is Allah's
command that we exercise our intellect in
reflecting over His signs in order to repel any
doubts that may arise in the mind. The
science of "Ilm al-Kalam seeks to achieve the
same objective.
@@MThre3 I'm not talking about logic I'm talking about philosophy. This is not the way Islam was spread.
@@sarras444 If you say "did all this come from nothing?" To an atheist is that not logical? It's still philosophy.
Assalamu alaikum.
Ibn Taymiyya is not bringing a new argument that was not understood by the Sahaba. He was simply explaining the fact that dependent things must exist by an eternal Creator. He was explicating this simple fact in technical terms which sophisticated people will find easier to accept. The arguments you should use depend on your audience.
@@sarras444 ALLAH even uses the western media of propaganda to spread Islam. ALLAH is not limited to any means by which HE guides his servants. U have a very narrow way of lookin at things…
Brother the argument is brilliant
But you can't say Allah is partless, you can say instead that within the creation, everything that is made of parts is contingent.
And the set of laws (including: parts->contingent) made by the creator are not to be applied to the creator. It stops within the creation
Yeah what he said
Lol yh!
i've read the book, it's free to download, it's amazing and complete!
ما شاء الله جزاكم الله خيرا
Well put brother. Also love the Nigerian hat
That was beautiful Thank you
Ash-Shaafi'i said: "My judgment concerning
Kalaam theologians is that they should be taken
around the community and beaten with palm
branches and slippers and it will be said to them: this is the punishment for leaving the Words of Allah and the words of the Messenger of Allah, sallallaahu 'alayhi wa sallam."
Mohammed Hijab you are a disingenuous individual especially as you want to use Ibn Taymiyyah RH to back up your claims as some sort of authority but previously disregarded him and belittled him. You can't have your cake and eat it.
Hijab you know what you’re doing is insincere and falsehood. The difference between ibn
taymiyyah RH and people of your ilk is that he
heard the arguments of the people of kalam and showed their error in their arguments l.e refuted their baatil and foolishness whilst you use kalam to prove Allahs existence and support your claims.
That is not the same. Ibn taymiyyah RH never
used kalam to prove Allahs existence or
attributes. You are a liar and you should fear Allah swt.
th-cam.com/video/10cvFb14IfY/w-d-xo.html
Haba Akhi I’m from Nigeria 🇳🇬 .. no idea you came around