Mig-35 Vs Su-35 - Why Does Russia Need The Mig-35S When They Already Have The Su-35S?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 31 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 52

  • @Roneck888
    @Roneck888 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The Mig35 is much less expensive because it does not have thrust vectoring but is easier to maintain.

  • @chadbernard2641
    @chadbernard2641 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The MiG 35 has greatly reduced maintenance that was one the main goals. Plus engine hours have increased from 2000 - 4000 hours.

  • @khondermnonborkeo9000
    @khondermnonborkeo9000 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thnx the speaker, you make me finish my education very soon

  • @lillyro8636
    @lillyro8636 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Mig 35.
    The aircraft has a length of 17.3 meters, a maximum take-off weight of 29.7 tons, a combat load of 7 tons, a maximum speed of 2.5 thousand km / h, and a practical range of 3,000 km. It is equipped with a "Zhuk-AE" radar with an active phased array antenna, and has an electro-station control system. It can detect the launch of an enemy missile and track its movement. Its radars are able to see an aerodynamic target at a distance of 200-260 km. The combat radius of such a vehicle is 1,000 km. In terms of climb rate, it has no equal - as much as 330 m/s.
    Armament composition: built-in GSH gun-30-1 30 mm, 10 suspension points, R-73, R-27, RVV-AE. The fighter is equipped with modern anti-ship, anti-radar missiles and the latest models of the air class. It also has adjustable bombs and aerial mines.
    Su 35.
    The length of the aircraft is 21.9 m, the maximum take-off weight is 34.5 tons, the combat load is 8 tons. The maximum speed is 2.5 thousand km / h, the non-stop distance is 3,500 km, the rate of climb is 280 m/ s, the combat radius is 1,800 km. The distance from which the target will be detected is 400 km. It uses the Irbis radar, SEIS, as well as an optical-location station. Equipped with electronic warfare and protection systems. It has sensors warning of a missile attack.
    Armament: aircraft gun GSH-30-1, 12 suspension units. Missiles: R-27, R-73, RVV. Equipped with the latest air-to-ground technology and precision-guided ammunition. Simultaneous firing is carried out by 8 missiles with an active homing head and 2 semi-active GOS missiles.
    They are only used for long-range combat. In addition, it is easier to sacrifice an inexpensive fighter in battle.

  • @josemunguia1883
    @josemunguia1883 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Great video 👍

  • @metalmadsen
    @metalmadsen ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video ❤

  • @Joshua_N-A
    @Joshua_N-A 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Mixed hi-lo is all I can say. Some countries maintain mixed fleets while others only maintain one type of fighter. The Fulcrum is supposed to be the jack-of-all-trades fighter while Flanker is designed for dominating contested airspace.

  • @alexandervocelka9125
    @alexandervocelka9125 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It’s competition and different design philosophies that make for top performance. Having a monopoly is inefficient, and this defense domain is still extremely important.

  • @mitchgingras3899
    @mitchgingras3899 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why do Russian aircraft fighters look like they can fly, while F-35's look like they were copied from Star Wars? Could it al be just about perception?

  • @zofe
    @zofe ปีที่แล้ว

    Wild-Weasel (SEAD/DEAD) rely on the climb-rate (aka turning radius) rather not on radar-performance. Thus the Mig-35 is important.

  • @johnbodman4504
    @johnbodman4504 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you Dung. I was wondering why Russia needed the two jets instead of one.

    • @Legion-xq8eo
      @Legion-xq8eo ปีที่แล้ว

      Why does the US need like 5?

  • @anwaribrahim3000
    @anwaribrahim3000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The best of MiG-35D & SU-35 FLaNkERs king of fighters in sky👍📡💣🛩

  • @zoopdterdoobdter5743
    @zoopdterdoobdter5743 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This becomes barely tolerable when sped up to 2.0x speed. Why are so many military channels run by slow-talkers!?!

  • @f1n98
    @f1n98 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Because they are both awesome no matter how. As simple as that.

  • @stonefree1911
    @stonefree1911 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I've always really liked the Mig 29 series as it was the first Russian fighter to really turn the heads of the West. But the SU 35 is a superior aircraft.

    • @sachsgs2509
      @sachsgs2509 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The first to turn heads was the 25

    • @4411825
      @4411825 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@sachsgs2509 Technically it was the MIG-15.

  • @alexs7189
    @alexs7189 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    the SU-35 is the latest evolution of the SU-27 after the su-30, while the MIG-35 and only an evolution of the Mig-29, are aircraft with prices and performances not comparable, a MIG-35 costs 50 million, menstre a SU-35 85 million, there are 35 million difference.

  • @dreamhunter2973
    @dreamhunter2973 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Good video!!!!Mr tran, can you plzz do a video on India's Nilgiri class future frigates??? You did one on the Shivalik class so please do one on the Nilgiri class too.
    Also can you do one video on the Mig 35 alone....you haven't done it tooo. Another one you haven't done is Russia's new nuclear destroyer tooo

  • @numeric.alphabet
    @numeric.alphabet 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Emang architecture bikin miniature nya doeloe..?

  • @ninonucaro8539
    @ninonucaro8539 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hey my dear brother, I am always happy to see your videos, every single one is great on it's own. You have a great pace on uploading new videos, thanks and go on the goof llllllllĺllway

  • @Hitichi100
    @Hitichi100 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome video! I bet your favorite letter in English is S. You sound like a hissing Sssssnake!! Good video keep up good work and ssssee you next time.

  • @numeric.alphabet
    @numeric.alphabet 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Aslinya itu teh bisa dua bukan tutupnya jembatan via duct

  • @clerus17
    @clerus17 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Ssssss is thisssss wasssss made by snakeee ssssss

  • @aramisone7198
    @aramisone7198 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    If the Mig 35 has an AESA radar it will be good, the first serial produced will not have it.

  • @AndrewMcFarlane_1
    @AndrewMcFarlane_1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Is a serpent speaking?

  • @samsah6447
    @samsah6447 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    hadirrr,,,,,,malaysia timur sabah♥️
    terbaik,mig35,su35,su57,su75♥️

  • @iHUNT3R
    @iHUNT3R 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Maybe in the future try to avoid the letter S 🤣🤣

  • @allgood6760
    @allgood6760 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome planes👍✈️

  • @gazaneagles
    @gazaneagles 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    loosen up the accent...it's bordering distortion.

  • @olivieryeung398
    @olivieryeung398 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    no understand what u say

  • @johndelong5574
    @johndelong5574 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wouldnt it be great if putin biult homes instead of weapons.

    • @4411825
      @4411825 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not when you have NATO spreading worst than COVID-19!

  • @arturasnesakysiu1684
    @arturasnesakysiu1684 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Russia needs mig. Cause su in general is bomber, while mig is long range interceptor.simple place mig vs su. Su wont even see him, will be blown from sky . Go look for generation beck and you will find su as frogfoot call full fledge bomber. Similar to a10. Yes a10 can have air to air, but against f16 its dead. Fact wont change if you develop it more roles .

  • @watcher5729
    @watcher5729 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mig35 s have been upgraded for better airframes and cost egfectiveness compared to the m29s.
    Likely sukhois prefered agter the cold vvar.
    Short take off and landable on rougher terrain.
    A rugged plane comparedcto many.
    Lovv costvmaintenance compared to many ADVERTISED ANYAY

  • @tukuldengkul6335
    @tukuldengkul6335 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    MIG - 35 S FIGHTER JET RUSSIA 💪💪💪💪

  • @tukuldengkul6335
    @tukuldengkul6335 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    FIGHTER JET RUSSIA 💪💪💪💪

  • @ossa60
    @ossa60 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    WHAT THE FU.. IS THAT VOICE???

  • @charliechan8063
    @charliechan8063 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is ownage doin the narrator lol

  • @nakdad
    @nakdad 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    New fan new subscriber. I love the Israeli Defense forces reviews without the sometimes hatred bias to it.

    • @nakdad
      @nakdad 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Also finally a video without a robotic voice

    • @DungTranMilitaryBlog
      @DungTranMilitaryBlog  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      thank you

  • @hardyanpajero69
    @hardyanpajero69 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    👍😎☕🍩✈️✈️