Hollywood is so over: The INSANE progress of AI videos
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ก.ค. 2024
- AI video generation reaches new limits.
#runwaygen3 #aivideo #ainews #ai #agi #singularity
Thanks to our sponsor Video to Blog. Convert TH-cam videos into high-quality, SEO-optimized blog articles in seconds
www.videotoblog.ai/?via=ref
Newsletter: aisearch.substack.com/
Find AI tools & jobs: ai-search.io/
Support: ko-fi.com/aisearch
Here's my equipment, in case you're wondering:
Dell Precision 5690 dell.to/4cAYjSZ
GPU: Nvidia RTX 5000 Ada nvda.ws/3zfqGqS
Mouse/Keyboard: ALOGIC Echelon bit.ly/alogic-echelon
Mic: Shure SM7B amzn.to/3DErjt1
Audio interface: Scarlett Solo amzn.to/3qELMeu - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
![กินอาหาร ถูก vs แพง!! จานละ 500,000 vs จานละ 50!! [Ver. 2024]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/FF_HppKg4vs/mqdefault.jpg)
![The moment we stopped understanding AI [AlexNet]](/img/n.gif)
Thanks to our sponsor Video to Blog. Convert TH-cam videos into high-quality, SEO-optimized blog articles in seconds
www.videotoblog.ai/?via=ref
Number 2 is AI generated 0:28
You know dude, you can made your videos without insulting the hard work people put onto their craft, thinking they will be replaced by you writing a prompt, please dont do this in your videos is really offensive and indignant.
You really went on a tangent on the later part of the video that was really unnecessary, this is why people still hate ai bros.
feel free to use anything from my account as an example bro im a sub.
This is what happens when you tease something like Sora and forget we're in the middle of an "AI arms race"
have to censor it so you cant have trump twerking!!
well said
It's so funny that we benchmark AI's improvement via prompting Will Smith eating spaghetti 😂
It should be will smith slapping spaghetti instead ;)
based-on this; when Morpheus ask Neo
"what is real?" has aged flawlessly, and is up
Googleplex‼️🥶
OpenAI all thought sora would never release because of how good it is but all they did was get their competition to start working on ai videos, they are gonna release it with no limitations at this point because everyone else already has
Did they say this or is it just speculation? i don't get why they would assume that , I think they just thought they were ahead , not that no one would ever do it...
Hollywood is like that guy whose wife left him for some guy named AI, and he thinks that once she has her fun, she will run back to him, but she never will.
Called it a while ago. Hollywood is toast, everybody will create their own movies at home and share them on youtube or elsewhere.
Same with games, books, music, truth
@@dasistdiewahrheit9585 People can already do this with books. Using AI, while it still takes a long time. Is not as dreadful and painful.
@@ThanosDestroyeryearsago A long time? I get at least 20 token per second out of locally running 8B models.
i don't think hollywood is over; hollywood as we know is over
Hollywood is rapidly changing, or at least certain parts of it are rapidly changing. Video creation apps will be a major help to film makers, especially the ones who cannot afford to pay millions for special FX.
It will give power in the hands of indie producers.
Just imagine what kind of memes awaits for us!
I'm an electronic music producer and we spectated the same situation in 2000s when $1 billion cost mixing consoles in a special buildings were replaced by $200 cost software at your bedrooms.
In a 2010 you had complete symphonic orchestra under your fingertips.
And now you have even singing software which sounds extremely natural for just $150 and free LLM which can generate unlimited lyrics in seconds.
Yes, lots of jobs will disappear.
Some people (who explore new technologies and opportunities) will become very famous which wouldn't be possible for them without these technologies.
It's just how nature and the evolution works: people invent new tools and competition becomes more hard.
The difference is just in speed of changes. It took a centuries at the ancient times, but it takes just a year at present.
It's just a life ...
indeed , people just have to invest in their ability to anticipate and adapt , i know it's not simple but we don't have a choice really....
I'm here for augmentations and robo-prosthetics, the rest will fade just as quick as it appeared. The era of media consumption is going down faaaast.
@@user-fr2jc8xb9g ►people just have to invest in their ability to anticipate and adapt◄
Unfortunately, that's not the case.
We have a huge limitation on learning and the evolution of AI is so fasta we have no chance "adapting" and "learning new stuff" as any new thing you might learn AI can do better, faster and cheaper.
I agree with ya
Most of the AI video generators are slow-mo, so the 2 minutes in reality is 1 minute if you speed it up to normal speed
I haven't seen the video yet, but the pianist doesn't wear a ring on his/her left hand but the mirroring image of the hand does.
good catch!
And the reflections of his hand occasionally move trough the wood onto the real keynotes.
2025 is about to be wild
indeed
Rest of humanities future after the singularity. A new era.
Somebody gotta work hard to make 2025 wild
No camera, no artist, no director, no big cost, professional videos can be created by ai. At first, all this may seem very interesting and beneficial. But whoever you said earlier to avoid (camera, director, artist, crew... etc.), it is a community with them that helps the economic and social survival of this earth.
If the human is not able to maintain interest and interest in the work being done, then the work will be unpleasant for him, same is the life of the contents created by AI. The way you support ai so much shows your true taste and interest in art. Very difficult.
You know how long people will enjoy you and your content, but by then things will have gone out of people's hands.
And the future of our society will be so fckin stupid💀
I remember when the Will Smith spaghetti video had people speechless
The generational leaps have been wild
Makes you wonder what they aren't showing us.
I knew it was real because of the mole on her chin driving
yes! AI characters won't have these flaws
The mole on her chin was driving?
@@UlyssesDrax She was driving with her chin, dummy.
Eye movements were my clue
@@UlyssesDrax if you feed it enough, yes
Gymnastics when you fly on your job application
I have nearly 100% right. There are always small problems in the AI videos. For example does the hand in the mirror of the Piano sometimes reach out of the mirror. Faces often have glitches that don't feel right. Often reflections are to perfect, like in the spaceship. The only thing that really impressed me was the fireworks.
Thanks for sharing!
Just wait a year
@@DG123z Just wait a few months
@@Cznh Facts 💯 I was just trying to be conservative
The worst it's gonna be. Only getting better 🤯
My goodness! This is going break so many industries if this keeps up.
legal firms likely won't let that happen
i have yet to see ai do much beyond stock footage. When you can prompt human interaction at an emotional level things will become interesting.
Oh, so in a few months then?.
You already can
Things are going so crazy... In the near future, most people will believe that nothing is real.
How cute that people a few years ago were saying actors will soon be obsolete. We're talking about the entire industry being obsolete soon. It just hit me that this may create even more of an echo-chamber effect with ideas and communication. We thought social media was bad. Wait until everyone will be able to create their own Hollywood movie based on their own personalized sense of values, ideals and ethics. I fear nobody is going to adapt and change with the times. Why would you when everyone can create their own reality? Scary scary thought! This is going to fuel isolationalism that probably may lead to even more conflict amongst those that have learned to be uncompromising through this technology.
Yup
shows grandma with skin crawling around her face :is this real ?
At this point, you're being one of my most important sources to AI news!
Your commentaries and thoughts about the field are always on point
Thanks!
No camera, no artist, no director, no big cost, professional videos can be created by ai. At first, all this may seem very interesting and beneficial. But whoever you said earlier to avoid (camera, director, artist, crew... etc.), it is a community with them that helps the economic and social survival of this earth.
If the human is not able to maintain interest and interest in the work being done, then the work will be unpleasant for him, same is the life of the contents created by AI. The way you support ai so much shows your true taste and interest in art. Very difficult.
You know how long people will enjoy you and your content, but by then things will have gone out of people's hands.
This comment took the words out of my mouth, I think so too, or rather, it took my fingers off the keyboard, right?
@@veenasuresh7054 They said the same thing when cars were replacing horses. Or when agricultural machines were replacing farmers. It turned out that the human productivity exponentially multiplied itself.
"Hollywood is over" is the new "Tesla is over, here comes competition."
Hollywood is not just "create video clips."
For a second there I thought you were identifying every black man eating spaghetti as Will Smith. 😄
These AI generators often have policies to not generate real people, so people are generating the closest thing to Will Smith eating spaghetti.
Hollywood has been in decline for many years, and I think that this could mean it's final end. For far too long, Hollywood has dominated the viewpoints that are presented in society merely because it has access to the massive infrastructure that making films traditionally required. But now that films can be made by anybody with access to a computer, I think we're going to see a much wider variety of films made for many different viewpoints and tastes.
This was exactly why all those Hollywood peeps went on strike a few months back and insisted on AI be locked out out of content creation.
Nice to see that they will be completely discarded as both obsolete and expensive.
I don't believe it will replace traditional film making. These tools will complement existing methods. But they will vanish many jobs in the field of advertising.
Give it 5 -10 years, entire movies from single prompts.
Ad agencies are done. All marketing and visuals are already starting to be done internally.
THAT'S THE POINT!!!!!!
@@richardbergin If you want mediocre slop then sure. The whole idea of a film being made from a single prompt is incredibly ignorant of how great films are made.
@@TheCreativeNickwith the right tools and prompt, your words will mean nothing soon. Always remember that this is as bad as AI is ever going to be
The first two were pretty easy to tell the sci-fi room was also easy to tell because AI typically likes to move the camera around like that. The girl in the fireplace was easy to tell because AI typically uses the same smile format when creating these kind of images, The concert was actually realistic until the last part were cloud made it look fake. The fakest one of them all was a sunflower girl and the old wrinkly lady. I caught the real ones because I feel like there was some reverse psychology going on and you pick something that would look easier for AI to generate
thx for sharing!
Idk I’m scared
Be scared if they just use it for BS like this such as art/entertainment, Be optimistic if they pull their finger out and actually use A.I. properly for research to find cures for diseases.
YEA! YOU SHOULD BE.
@@livlaughlove4646 you’re clearly a killer AI robot trying to warn me
Don't worry I'll hold you we'll get through this together
This technology is really impressive and I'm curious to learn more about how these models work, including how they were trained (we cannot forget about the actual artists whose work made these kinds of models possible in the first place!)
However, I disagree about how this will change Hollywood and traditional filmmaking in general. What many fail to realize is that the process of making art is just as, if not more important than, the result. They want to go from A to C as fast as possible, that they forget about B.
Traditional film-making is deeply rooted in artistic intention and vision. For instance, take music videos, which you pretty frequently in this video. The dance choreography is created by experts with actual intention in mind to match the song's rhythm, lyrics, and the artist's message. In narrative filmmaking, every single character expression, environment, piece of dialogue, keyframe, etc is made with purpose and direction. Directors and cinematographers carefully compose each shot, set designers build environments that help reflect the tone of the scene, and actors will refer to sensitive, personal experiences to better bring out dialogue. Even in animation, every keyframe is deliberately placed to convey even the most nuanced of emotions. Filmmakers and artists in general pour their personal experiences, emotions, and unique perspectives into every aspect of their work.
You could argue that using detailed prompts to "direct" the AI is the same as directing a team of actual filmmakers. However, unlike humans, AI lacks personal experiences, emotional attachments, or genuine understanding of the world. It's literally a machine, incapable of drawing from lived experiences or emotional depth to inform its creations. When a director asks an actor to convey a complex emotion, the actor draws from their own life experiences. Generative AI, no matter how sophisticated the prompt, cannot replicate this level of depth of human experience and emotion.
And I think portraying the need to hire actors, cinematographers, etc as a bad thing is pretty close-minded. We often forget how beneficial a collaborative environment can be. Working with people who all specialize in various fields allows everyone to pitch in their own ideas, their own experiences, and own spin to the film in a cohesive way. And if you just want to make a film all by yourself, you still can! You don't necessarily need to hire a whole team of people to make good films; there's numerous solo films on TH-cam that rival fully-fledged Hollywood blockbusters. It's more important about whether or not you're willing to learn and put in the work. If you don't want to put in any effort, don't expect a good result. I find the idea of relying entirely on a machine honestly quite sad, especially when you are more than fully capable of learning it yourself.
With that being said, AI just seems like a mock-up tool at best. There can definitely be valid use-cases for AI as an ASSISTIVE tool, but outright replacing all artists is simply unrealistic. Even then, a great filmmaker may only need a rough, 15-second storyboard drawing to envision it on the big screen (such as Rian Johnson's infamous Knives Out storyboard drawing!).
Also, the last thing I want is to have TH-cam be flooded with automated AI music videos or films made by people who just want to make a quick buck.
Always remember! It's not what it can do now, it's what it can do in 6 months from now!
They all look like AI other than some landscapes.
16/17 no way i got the last one wrong :(
When you know there is a possibility of an AI generated content its super easy to spot it, but if you just showed me those videos without context i would not be able to tell at all
thx for sharing! the last one is tricky
Definitely i have lower score, but last one i started to thought about AI by looking on boots. For me it's was kinda weird motion blur.
me trying to find a chinese friend but not finding one.
😭
There was a glitch in the old wømen when she moved that gave that one away, some others too had something that gave them away but overall these were extremely believable. I’m doubting ppl that say they got them all right, at least if you just watched the videos once.
The second video (the young guy near a beach) has a glitch with the water. AI doesn't animate water well.
And the fireworks video was not seamless.
The "high cost," as you pointed out, is relative. A box that could run Adobe Premiere used to run into the thousands. These new tools offer creative capabilities that are several orders of magnitude greater in scope. What all of this will do is GREATLY lower the barrier to entry in the field.
You can still tell to a degree with elements of unrealistic or repeated motion . Hair & clothing for example.
Not gonna lie, this had the “all of the above” vibe 😂
I think movie industry is going to evolve, and not erase jobs but rather let the cream rise to the top. I’d be terrified if I was in a position that wasn’t earned by true talent or skill
We are a maximum of 12 months from naked eye perfect AI generated video. We are approaching "good enough" video even more rapidly. The biggest threat is to those creatives who make up the most routine parts of the creative craft. Those 60k-75k jobs that are held by the persistantly mediocre are under threat.
Realistically, I think actual legit music videos could be highly subsidized with AI video by next year. And before the decade is over, individual in-home directors could rival hollywood on the full length movie/TV show front.
Regardless of how real individual shots look, for a prolonged movie with multiple shots, scenes and dialogue, you need consistent characters and objects to behave the way you want them to (anything from staging positions in a house to a car chase through a city), having consistent clothes on, in a consistent environment with consistent lighting and consistent camera angles, with at least believable mouth movement for the dialogue. I think it's going to be a while still, but not like decades away, just maybe 3 years or so.
No camera, no artist, no director, no big cost, professional videos can be created by ai. At first, all this may seem very interesting and beneficial. But whoever you said earlier to avoid (camera, director, artist, crew... etc.), it is a community with them that helps the economic and social survival of this earth.
If the human is not able to maintain interest and interest in the work being done, then the work will be unpleasant for him, same is the life of the contents created by AI. The way you support ai so much shows your true taste and interest in art. Very difficult.
You know how long people will enjoy you and your content, but by then things will have gone out of people's hands.
I wish you explained how much a real shoot costs more than just three times. Now, if you miss it three times, you still don’t have a clue.
i think it would be cheaper to build a agi agent let it use the other gen ai tools and media tools to create final product, instead of hoping single gen ai model to create full length movie at once.
*I see why you have so many subs, you came in with the sauce. You mentioned all of the websites and how to use em, very detailed for novices. Thanks*
5:07 Elon making an ahegao face is one nightmare fuel and a half 🥶
I hope that over time the competition will improve its quality and the prices for generating videos will be lower or the videos will be longer.
No camera, no artist, no director, no big cost, professional videos can be created by ai. At first, all this may seem very interesting and beneficial. But whoever you said earlier to avoid (camera, director, artist, crew... etc.), it is a community with them that helps the economic and social survival of this earth.
If the human is not able to maintain interest and interest in the work being done, then the work will be unpleasant for him, same is the life of the contents created by AI. The way you support ai so much shows your true taste and interest in art. Very difficult.
You know how long people will enjoy you and your content, but by then things will have gone out of people's hands.
My issue is, it doesn't seem to do what I ask it to do.. and each generation goes towards your credits whether it's what you asked for or not. It's like asking for a pizza at a restaurant, getting a small tyre instead, and still being charged for the tyre.
Yeah but the issue with that is, if you can say meh don't quite like this one and then get a refund everytime... that wouldnt work. And with a limir on the refunds; that still would cost more compute and thus the price per credit would be higher so customer wouldn't really gain anything
"Move the dancer on the left to the right by 2 ft. and change the center dancer"s shirt color from blue to orange. Have her kick her left foot to waist height. Leave all other elements and movements the same." Small changes, constantly a part of commercial production, just don't happen yet.
15:17 lmao this caught me off gaurd
The AI videos are pretty easy to pick out for the most part if you know what to look for. There were a few I wasn't sure about and one or two I guessed wrong on, but AI video still has a way to go to be indistinguishable like AI art can be now.
This will obliterate the world of stock videos.
Making movies is a whole different beast, it's cheaper and more effective to shoot it on camera.
In that case, AI will be a tool like many for manipulating the images, not a substitute for acting.
The Kling web side is now live, and the maximum time has been extended to three minutes, with support for image-generated videos.
However, you still need to apply for the beta to use it, and while many people have already obtained it (including me), the official reservation site shows that there are still about 500,000 accounts in the queue
What I'm not satisfied with Kling is that the generation of character faces seems to be only a few cases, and is still unsatisfactory for high-speed movement, fight scene is basically a tangle of limbs.
Ai videos tend to have really high quality, almost movie professional levels to them. Thats how i know if something is AI or not, for now. Obviously the options to tone them down is gonna available in the future.
the problem with AI is consistancy in charekter creation. I would be hard to do follow up sceens with exactly the same people that dont look any diffrent, or just have their clothe changed for the next sceen. Also either you go full AI or you just use CGI because u cant really use Tracking in AI yet. So making a background with a realistic forground with camera movement is close to impossible in AI. Also I know you can make realistic 3D models with AI, but they lack quality and the AI has to learn on it, you are better off using photogrametry at that point ans use tracking for making the virtual charekter move, instead of solving AI. If you dont have money AI is ok. But it will get corney really quick and we are far from making movies with a good story and full AI charekters that dont look like ass.
at 15:18
AI: "Peace", without batting an eye proceeds to slyly lower the first finger as it pans over, looking you straight in the eye the whole time.
I wasn't sure whether to laugh or be creeped out. lol
Also, great video!!
I knew the first aerial shot was real because AI wouldn't put people in the video
all you need to spot difference between AI generated content and real photos, is that AI almost always miss details and logic at back plane, and obviously hands, temporal coherence and quick context switching.
am I the only one that guessed it all correctly? like there's so many clues in there.
I got one wrong, the woman driving , only because looking out the window objects appear but agreed, soooo many clues
remember, you are fully focused on getting it right with hindsight of a test, others will not pick up on it that aren't as primed
8:41
the message reads: "i will be back later, i went to explore the backrooms."
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Totally!!
Do you think AI will fully replace traditional filmmaking, or will it become a tool to enhance it? Curious about everyone's thoughts!
Ai videos look like ALOT of ai generated pictures mashed togather into a very fast slideshow
But its fefinately gonna improve
When it comes to people you can tell it’s AI as the motion looks like it was filmed in reverse.
The firework one impressed me the most 😂
With all honesty...YT ate all the quality, the video looks like poop.
I've noticed a lot of issues, but the the one that freaked me out is the piano one. If you pause the video, you will notice, that reflected hand is too close to the original hand, so it's not in the reflected space anymore.
Merchant Ivory films were some of the best ever.....good stories about humans, zero special effects
3:22 how's real? How? Her nose tip moves out! Literally, you can check it by yourself!
4:24 Reflection touching the real keys, that must be real
Maybe she moved a muscle that did that, also the reflection of the ring isnt showing with the piano guy
4:24 no ring on the hand while there is a ring in reflection.
@@Ultimine1 If was only for the ring, it literally goes toward the "real" keys to play ahhaha
If you guys show this video to your parent, they will probably believe this is a real video
Hollywood will only be over when faces and people are consistent and can be directed. Otherwise this is and immensely powerful tool.
The speed with which advances are happening, I'm guessing it could literally be a few months when this is solved.
Absolutely! One year is all that's left.
I prefer the older AI video generators. Funny as hell and at least people could distinguish what's AI or not. Today most people can't distinguish and go on flaming artists that create art manually, spending a lot of time, blood, sweat and tears but are mistaken by AI and get threats because of it
Close shots of people are easy to detect if it's AI or not. I guessed all correctly because real person is still a real person, probably because of the eyes.
I guessed 11 of 17 right. The 6 ones where I made errors were nature/areal shots/big venues. Humans are still not very convincing. But the progress is amazing anyway!
Many of the videos were low res so it was hard to tell the details. Also the real videos were slowed down.
These look mostly real, but can see some weird morphing happening and unnatural movements, almost like it's breaking physics. Is it just me?
People are used to watching fantasy movies and watching cartoons. Things that simulate, exaggerate, or distort reality. So I think people will also get used to the fact that the video was created by A.I.
Imagine some hollywood director sitting at his desk trying to generate consistent videos across whole scene, where framing, lighting, performance and the set would be perfect... They already have done movies with full cgi, or just used actors face from the set (ironman cough cough) Using already available tools, you can pretty much do anything you want and how you want and not be dependent if machine follows some prompt... But AI will be available to generate assets into these programs.
It is like a party all the time! Because they come up with different themes like: deep tech week, gen AI week, open source week. I have been to Cloudflare, Notion, Gusto, Coinbase, Microsoft reactor, MindsDB, Cleanlabs. And all of them have speakers from Transformers paper like Ilia Polosukshin. Out of them all I want to meet Mira Muratti, marry her and have kids with her! 😂❤
Luckily it's still not complicated to distinguish real videos from AI generated. Details like missing ring on the finger of the piano player, which is visible in the reflection, or a unnatural fingers of the Asian guy, or the shaky skin of the elder woman's face in the close up, further away it looks like cartoon anyway, or unnatural movement of waves, if you are familiar with the sea. Not talking about that monster show in the background of the fashion presentation. All that secondary details are still instantly visible if it's important to you to understand if it's fake or not. In real videos you also see details, which AI would never think of, for example slightly visible spit between the teeth of real people, skin, reflections, all that is also still clearly visible. However, it's a big question how long yet the AI will ignore those details. It all is a question of time.
It's scary that I got 3 mistakes on identifying which is real or AI. Months ago I can easily tell them apart but now, I doubt myself.
oww btw, I got numbers 4, 5, and 13 wrong
The drone shot with the city in the top right and the electricity pilons that run out of view behind the hill, I knew that was real because I don't see AI knowing they're connected. The fireworks are probably the most insane, look at how the clouds linger between flashes and dark.
Can't wait for the Terminators who can access anyone's post history and find out if they were an AI hater, then respond accordingly.
"Are you @SarahConnor1982, your opinion is wrong!"
The only ones I got wrong was the second areal shot with the city in the background by the water, at the middle of the screen (thought the first was ai, and second was real) and then the fireworks one as well. I was really surprised by how good that was. It even managed to keep smoke trails between explosions!!! That second concert almost got me, but the very fast smoke at the end broke the illusion for me. I am watching at 360p on a phone in another country while I'm on vacation. So I'm using data saving quality to well, save data. At this resolution some of them were really tough to tell.
I only got 11 correct, but soon it will be much more difficult to tell.
That comparison fucked me up a lil bit lol
😃
There are still a lot of artefacts I guessed almost all of the ai generated videos
Got the river wrong as it was too blurry. Most are obvious if you understand where to look. Devil is in the details.
The physics. Always watching the physics.
The prompt scenes are only good as brainstorming.
Anyone that say ALL of that was real...... turn off your device, step outside and look around for an hour.
AI videos have very perceptible warping; especially if it has a lot of movement. The aerial landscape shots and firework footage was very hard to discern.
The Old woman was the most obvious AI video.
I just got number 5 wrong I thought it was AI, the other ones I got right.
AI still hasn't gotten past the uncanny valley with humans. Parts move that aren't supposed to.
I'm guessing that in the future, the film industry will consist of "specialists" instead of "generalists", i.e. actors who are good with emotions. Like, the partial but big point of why people watch movies or series is to relate to the characters when going from A to Z. This requires human emotions, which is something I seriously doubt AI can achieve (if it can then we should probably be worried about Age of Ultron shenanigans instead).
Another contender would be high-action mapping, when specific motions is needed, the specialist would key-frame a stick figure then let AI cover the rest based on the template.
I almost got all of them right except for the fireworks, close up of the curly haired woman, the rive scenery, the close up of the woman driving, and the fashion show runway.
The resolution/detail level of these video generators needs to improve before these they are ready for professional use. Kling may output 1080p videos but the resolution looks nearer to 480p. Other video generators produce content that sometimes looks closer to 360p. You could of course use a video upscaler like Topaz to try to improve on the quality but that will add considerably to the cost.
Am I the only one who is not interested in closed source AI tools?
Kinda tired of paying to create legal training data for such companies. Especially when they do not share research papers.
And I must add that to create something actually usable with AI - you need to have actual skills and experience in that field.
Good for exploring concepts - bad as final output, and terrible if you need to change even a small detail.
Imagine in a few years ...100% of the content created by Ai, no more scripts, no editing, no cameras, no microphones, and no Monetization... "Amazing" ?
Dead internet theory moment
There is still a quality that I see in AI videos that looks too perfect. But I was fooled a couple of times in this set. We are definitely at the cusp of not knowing what is real.
I got the woman driving and aerial shot right and thought the rest is AI, so pretty close. I can't quite explain it but I can generally tell a really real video when I see one. The ones I'm not sure about are the likes that would've always felt off to me regardless of whether it was AI generated.
We definitely haven't reached the platou yet but I have reason to believe we will, AI as it stands is doomed to give diminishing returns, artifactual life is the way forward. But until we do hit it I hope we improve enough to make full length movies with audio and stuff