Reacting Fluorine with Caesium - First Time on Camera

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ธ.ค. 2012
  • In preparation for the 2012 Christmas Lectures Dr Peter Wothers heads off to the University of Leicester to conduct an extraordinary experiment - reacting the most reactive metal in the periodic table (Caesium) with the most reactive non-metal (Fluorine).
    Due to the extreme reactivity of the two elements, Fluorine expert Professor Eric Hope is on hand to enable the experiment to be conducted safely.
    We believe this is the first time the reaction has been caught on camera.
    The Ri is on Twitter: / ri_science
    and Facebook: / royalinstitution
    and Tumblr: / ri-science
    Our editorial policy: www.rigb.org/home/editorial-po...
    Subscribe for the latest science videos: bit.ly/RiNewsletter
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 1.1K

  • @TheRoyalInstitution
    @TheRoyalInstitution  6 ปีที่แล้ว +238

    Thank you, our Swedish friend, for translating this video into one of our favourite Nordic languages. Tack så mycket!

    • @secondthought2320
      @secondthought2320 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The Royal Institution , please explain what each element is actually used for, thanks.

    • @HMan2828
      @HMan2828 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      But but but what are the reaction products?! This was nice but a bit too short IMO, some details about the reaction would have been nice.

    • @user-pd5uz2eu4x
      @user-pd5uz2eu4x 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I represent a Lithuanian company, which sells cesium 99.99 we are looking for buyers. if you find a buyer you are from the sale
      get a percentage.
      If you have any other questions, please feel free to ask them.

    • @mathskafunda4383
      @mathskafunda4383 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@HMan2828 It's obviously Cesium Fluoride(CsF)

    • @shadow_rune6178
      @shadow_rune6178 ปีที่แล้ว

      Francium has a half life of 22 minutes. Nuff said.

  • @xander1052
    @xander1052 6 ปีที่แล้ว +232

    And now, You have created one of the most stable compounds, Caesium Fluoride, good luck freeing the caesium again without a lot of hard work from that, though I have to say I have always wanted to see this reaction. Made my day.

    • @thetaintpainter5443
      @thetaintpainter5443 2 ปีที่แล้ว +38

      Actually, CsF is so ionic and the differential in charge is so great that is not that stable

    • @xander1052
      @xander1052 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@thetaintpainter5443 huh, interesting

    • @sinewave1578
      @sinewave1578 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      There is a simple answer to that - electrolysis.

    • @Lucius_Chiaraviglio
      @Lucius_Chiaraviglio ปีที่แล้ว +28

      Lithium fluoride would be even more stable, because lithium is much smaller, so the ions can get much closer together and therefore be held together more strongly by their opposite charges. Lithium fluoride has a standard enthalpy of formation -616 kJ/mol as opposed to cesium fluoride having a standard enthalpy of formation -553.5 kJ/mol. (I would have given the Gibbs free energy of formation, but I couldn't find it off the bat for lithium fluoride; for cesium fluoride it isn't very different from the standard enthalpy of formation.) And lithium fluoride binds to itself so well that it doesn't dissolve very well in water, whereas ridiculous amounts of cesium fluoride dissolve in water.

    • @blindandwatching
      @blindandwatching 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Cesium iodide?

  • @calumcookson740
    @calumcookson740 8 ปีที่แล้ว +441

    "Why have I come up to Leicester?" Not the first person to ask that question I'm sure...

    • @arbitermatt
      @arbitermatt 8 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      To see champions league football I should think.

    • @ITILII
      @ITILII 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      A question often asked, yet, alas - can never truly be answered ......

    • @rohithpeddi
      @rohithpeddi 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      for anyone searching for the music, it’s decisions by kevin macleod.

    • @georgewhitehead8185
      @georgewhitehead8185 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      To see the body of King Richard III who was found by Ms. Philippa Langley. Congratulations, and all honor forever to her. Doctor George Whitehead

    • @DavidCowie2022
      @DavidCowie2022 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The board gaming convention Manorcon is in Leicester. A niche reason is still a reason.

  • @TheRoyalInstitution
    @TheRoyalInstitution  11 ปีที่แล้ว +322

    Although it sounds counter-intuitive, Caesium is actually more reactive than Francium. Caesium actually has a lower ionisation energy than Francium (~392.811 kJ/mol for Francium and ~375.7041 kJ/mol for caesium). This is thought to be due to relativistic effects - have a google search around the subject, very interesting!

    • @DaughterofRevenge
      @DaughterofRevenge 6 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      The Royal Institution The pattern has also been observed between Barium and Radium.

    • @ITILII
      @ITILII 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      The internet is NOT the property of google; just say do an internet search, don't assign any proprietary terms to it, thank you

    • @nihilongongo
      @nihilongongo 4 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      @@ITILII no

    • @E_Rico
      @E_Rico 4 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      ITILII you got offended by nothing

    • @Drakoneiros
      @Drakoneiros 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@ITILII I mean, do you call a tissue a Kleenex or a copier a Xerox? Is soda Coke to you? If so, you're a hypocrite.

  • @ThePaulPyro
    @ThePaulPyro 10 ปีที่แล้ว +673

    Now it has to be like mythbusters and upscale the reaction to 10kg cesium and 20L fluorine gas :p

    • @BloodSoul2
      @BloodSoul2 9 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Mythbusters is rookie science, dude

    • @petersonwagner4671
      @petersonwagner4671 9 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      BloodCrisis BloodSoul Zombie Feynman disagrees with you. xkcd.com/397/

    • @BloodSoul2
      @BloodSoul2 9 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Yeah, but brainless experiences lead to nowhere. I'm not a fan of theoretical science only; but they are not true scientist just artists, and you can see many of they experiments aren't well conduced.

    • @petersonwagner4671
      @petersonwagner4671 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      BloodCrisis BloodSoul Did you click the link?

    • @BloodSoul2
      @BloodSoul2 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      You're right, but as you say only "the beginning"

  • @theq4602
    @theq4602 7 ปีที่แล้ว +129

    At Clemson University in South Carolina a fluorine chemist has lost an arm and several fingers during his grad days working with fluorine. According to my teacher when she went there she could often here explosions coming from the fluorine lab.

    • @user-yb5cn3np5q
      @user-yb5cn3np5q 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      "Hexanitro? Say what? I’d call for all the chemists who’ve ever worked with a hexanitro compound to raise their hands, but that might be assuming too much about the limb-to-chemist ratio."
      blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2011/11/11/things_i_wont_work_with_hexanitrohexaazaisowurtzitane

    • @bhoomipurohit_nd5_em802
      @bhoomipurohit_nd5_em802 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Poor scientist :'-(

    • @celtc7875
      @celtc7875 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      hear*

  • @blarg2429
    @blarg2429 8 ปีที่แล้ว +766

    Could this be considered a reaction video? :P
    I'll show myself out.

    • @sevgadagenty9229
      @sevgadagenty9229 8 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      +blarg2429 Fine bros: It still counts! TAKE IT DOWN

    • @xenofurmi
      @xenofurmi 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... very good.

    • @CEO__155
      @CEO__155 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Good meme

    • @nosirrahx
      @nosirrahx 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Like for dad joke.

    • @us89na
      @us89na 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Dr Wothers himself makes the joke (unintentionally) at 1:16 "What was your first REACTION when I said..."

  • @jamesnw
    @jamesnw 9 ปีที่แล้ว +489

    260 people were hoping for a big explosion, and perhaps a bit of injury. ;)

    • @ModMINI
      @ModMINI 8 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      +James Wilkins I was surprised - I though it would explode. Cesium is extremely violent when dropped into water. It goes "bang." I thought fluorine might go "BANG!"

    • @TheWizardGandy
      @TheWizardGandy 8 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      +Mod MINI The bang comes form the hydrogen gas released that then combusts with oxygen in the air. The cesium is just really effective at tearing the oxygen away from the hydrogen in water, which generates heat which then in turn ignites the hydrogen.

    • @km5405
      @km5405 8 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      +lockerboy13 recently disproven - its actually a coulombic explosion

    • @TheWizardGandy
      @TheWizardGandy 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Kevin Miedema Huh, wonder if that's something that my chemistry teachers have always just glossed over.

    • @km5405
      @km5405 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      +lockerboy13 nah its a relatively unknown phenomena, simply put the chemical reaction shouldn't create a rapid explosion (as thunderf00t showed in his videos) its only recently been well observed exactly how this happens

  • @TheRoyalInstitution
    @TheRoyalInstitution  8 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    To the person who just translated this, and a whole bunch of our other videos, into Portuguese, obrigado!!!! Thanks so much, we really, really appreciate it!
    If anyone else wants to contribute translations, to help make our videos available to more people around the world, please jump right in: th-cam.com/users/timedtext_cs_panel?c=UCYeF244yNGuFefuFKqxIAXw&tab=2

    • @LuisBrudna
      @LuisBrudna 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      You're welcome :-)

    • @HMan2828
      @HMan2828 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      So, was the product of the reaction analyzed? Did you end up with cesium fluoride? What was the yield? At what pressure would CsF3 be possible? So many questions, so little money to pay for university....

    • @dereksavastano
      @dereksavastano 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@HMan2828Not many people get to use it unfortunately, even past university I’ve heard. It’s a bit too reactive unfortunately.

  • @TheRoyalInstitution
    @TheRoyalInstitution  11 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    There wasn't any audible noise produced from the reaction - just the beautiful light given off! They needed a pure sample of Cs for this experiment and it can be quite difficult to isolate because it is so reactive - it's makes it quite dangerous to handle as well!

    • @bhoomipurohit_nd5_em802
      @bhoomipurohit_nd5_em802 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Just like sodium and potassium are stored in kerosene, was caesium also stored in kerosene???

    • @lucascheng6674
      @lucascheng6674 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@bhoomipurohit_nd5_em802 no, its stored in a glass capsule, in a vacuum coz it can melt at slightly above the room temperature

  • @alexandriariley5209
    @alexandriariley5209 8 ปีที่แล้ว +75

    May I just say that both of you professors are absolutely insane for doing this. With that said, that was interesting.

  • @PaulMontgomery1492
    @PaulMontgomery1492 9 ปีที่แล้ว +195

    Thirty years ago I worked for a company that among other things bought military surplus. The boss had gotten this strange ball made of stainless steel about the size of a softball, It had some fittings and rods coming out of it and looked a lot like the Sputnik spacecraft, It was obviously hollow and had some liquid in it. He and another employee got to work trying to cut it open. After a lot of hack sawing on the thing, they cut through and a silver liquid metal started pouring out. This surprised them and they tried to catch it in their hands thinking it was mercury. There was not much, about what the video showed. It started burning their skin and smoking. They ran to the sink to wash it off with water. When the water hit the metal, now stuck to their hands, it caught fire and exploded in small pops and fizzes. We later learned that it was caesium. Their hands healed after a few weeks.
    Later I did some research and to my best guess, the ball was indeed a satellite that the military used as a target in orbit to aim high energy xray beams at. This one never made it to space and ended up being sold (most likely by accident) at a surplus sale.

    • @piotrjoniec9179
      @piotrjoniec9179 9 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Well, that wasn't very smart.

    • @PaulMontgomery1492
      @PaulMontgomery1492 9 ปีที่แล้ว +59

      Wasn't very smart to sell a ball full of caesium or to get it on your hands? I must admit I was a little amused by the whole thing. I did not like my boss very well.

    • @piotrjoniec9179
      @piotrjoniec9179 9 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      To get it on your hands. There was an accident in Brazil I think, where a man has found a weird looking metal cylinder. After opening it (it took some time) he noticed there is a blue glowing metal inside. Long story short, it circulated between tons of people and it happened to be radioactive, causing tons of deaths.

    • @soylentgreenb
      @soylentgreenb 9 ปีที่แล้ว +53

      Piotr Joniec Ah, the Goiânia accident.
      It wasn't a metal, it was a radioactive caesium chloride salt that had been used as a gamma source for radiotherapy in a hospital.
      It wasn't tonnes of people who died, it was 4. Which might be surprising since it contained 93 grams (!!!!!) of ceasium-137 chloride and it was handled with a kind of unfathomable recklessness that seems surreal still today.
      He took the source in its container from it's shielding and brought it into his house and invited everyone to come and see it. Then they took turns using a screwdriver to chip out several rice-grained sized chunks of caesium-salt as well as scraping out dust and _shared it around with friends and family_. The person who found it _intended to make a ring of it for his wife_. One of the kids rubbed the stuff all over her arms so that she sparkled. His brother _painted a cross_ on his stomach using the dust. Some of it was _eaten_ by mistake. It ended up on bed clothes and every where else. It wasn't until 15 days later that the source was transported to a hospital so that it could be examined, in a plastic bag, _without shielding_, using _public transportation_.

    • @jamesroseii
      @jamesroseii 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Piotr Joniec Co60 I'm sure.

  • @SikanderkhanPTI
    @SikanderkhanPTI 9 ปีที่แล้ว +137

    The most electronegative element with the least one.

    • @venomoussloth5092
      @venomoussloth5092 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Wait, I'm a beginning chemist and maybe some of the stuff i've been taught is false, but isn't Francium the least electronegative?

    • @darkgreninja8349
      @darkgreninja8349 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@venomoussloth5092 no

    • @sanathkumar6526
      @sanathkumar6526 4 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      @@venomoussloth5092 Just studying the trends won't help....There are some anamolous properties in the groups and periods... Mostly because of their electronic configuration and their half/full symmetric configurations

    • @illya.ruslanovichshevchenk4106
      @illya.ruslanovichshevchenk4106 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@darkgreninja8349 Why no, Francium is the least electronegative

    • @bhoomipurohit_nd5_em802
      @bhoomipurohit_nd5_em802 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@venomoussloth5092 maybe because Francium is radioactive and it decays. Idk honestly as I'm a 10th grade student :-)

  • @devc.4322
    @devc.4322 5 ปีที่แล้ว +65

    Who else came here immediately after learning about periodic trends? I’m here but I need to study for my chem final:p

    • @bhoomipurohit_nd5_em802
      @bhoomipurohit_nd5_em802 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Me too! I study in 10th grade. What's your grade?

    • @Nexus-rt1bm
      @Nexus-rt1bm 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Well, this is an interesting coincidence.

    • @hamonthunder2740
      @hamonthunder2740 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ya

    •  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well, it’s quite counterintuitive for cesium to have a lower electronegativity than francium, despite it being above francium

  • @shreevathsacs
    @shreevathsacs 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    I was a student at Leicester. The video brought back great memories of those buildings! Amazing!

  • @RalphDratman
    @RalphDratman 10 ปีที่แล้ว +199

    That was quite a light.
    Now you are become death, the destroyer of labs.
    Did you measure anything? Anything at all?

    • @carlbailey7106
      @carlbailey7106 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      clever wordplay 😂

    • @guythat779
      @guythat779 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Qualitative measurements

    • @the-iter8
      @the-iter8 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      well, It was just a small qualitative experiment. The quantity was not In the spotlight.

  • @Parasmunt
    @Parasmunt 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This is true love in the periodic table, yin and yang.
    The one that wants the electrical charge most and the one that wants most to give it's charge away.

  • @TheRoyalInstitution
    @TheRoyalInstitution  6 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Thanks to our amazing French friend, you can all now enjoy this video with French captions. Merci beaucoup!

  • @mrburke4194
    @mrburke4194 9 ปีที่แล้ว +104

    01:25 am I the only one who thinks one of them should have said "No pun intended," after he says "That'd probably be most people's reaction?"

    • @nollie_ollie8358
      @nollie_ollie8358 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I thought the same thing xD

    • @benzenereactions1635
      @benzenereactions1635 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +MrBurkeGames WOW that's fuckin weird. Haha.

    • @nollie_ollie8358
      @nollie_ollie8358 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Benzene Reactions I like your name :D

    • @HalcyonSerenade
      @HalcyonSerenade 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +MrBurkeGames When he asked "what was your reaction...?" I was expecting the professor to respond with something like, "nothing compared to what we're about to see."

  • @anderudp
    @anderudp 10 ปีที่แล้ว +47

    Cs + F= CsF + A lot of f'ing heat, photons, and other good stuff. :)

    • @Mmouse_
      @Mmouse_ 10 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      This is what I was looking for amongst the comments... TH-cam comments are such a cesspool.

    • @stormonmormon14
      @stormonmormon14 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Don't forget fluorine is diatomic :)

    • @anderudp
      @anderudp 9 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      stormonmormon14 Rou're god damn right! 2 Cs + F2 => 2 CsF + Two times the lot of f'ing heat, photons, and other good stuff... :)

    • @richardwilliamsiii3951
      @richardwilliamsiii3951 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      2Cs + F2 = 2CsF

    • @DANGJOS
      @DANGJOS 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      And creates one of the most ionic compounds!

  • @toastbusters7797
    @toastbusters7797 7 ปีที่แล้ว +80

    The concept of this reaction makes me cringe in fear. Watching it done makes me even more scared. Thank you for performing it so that I didn't have to! I kind of enjoy being alive

    • @purplecharmanderz2975
      @purplecharmanderz2975 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      well hey we get a salt out of it... halogens and alkali metals make salt right... or at least a type of salt not necessarily NaCl

    • @purplecharmanderz2975
      @purplecharmanderz2975 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Shishlord k thanks all i knew when i posted that was alkalia metals and halogens make salts

    • @TheProCactus
      @TheProCactus 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Judging from this video. Anything could be going on. It might not have even been the chemicals mentioned :\
      bad video.

    • @zbrooo
      @zbrooo 7 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      It's exactly the same compound. Reacting caesium with fluorine gives caesium fluoride. You do not have to have an acid-base reaction to make a salt.

    • @aviator696
      @aviator696 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Fluorine, chlorine, bromine, and iodine (all of column 17 of the periodic table) are called halogens. The word "halogen" is Latin for "salt maker". The vast majority of salts are going to be fluorides, chlorides, bromides, and iodides.

  • @lukemich12
    @lukemich12 8 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    thats what light sabers are made out of

  • @kolisaksham
    @kolisaksham ปีที่แล้ว +6

    i'm a 12th grade student, i love chemistry, however i wondered how would the reaction look like and this bought me here... feels so satisfying🤗🤗

  • @zachreyhelmberger894
    @zachreyhelmberger894 8 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    Did anyone take a spectrum of the light? That would have been pretty cool!

    • @RWBHere
      @RWBHere 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Or hot?

    • @mykeprior3436
      @mykeprior3436 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I'd bet at least some UV, would hope for X-ray but I doubt it :P

    • @dustinbrueggemann1875
      @dustinbrueggemann1875 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      x-rays are at least 3-4 times the energy per photon than even the most energetic chemical reactions can emit. The energy of emitted photons can never exceed the energy of a single electron transition in a reaction.

    • @foracal5608
      @foracal5608 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Fluoralantimonic acid the nope acid

    • @williamsteveling8321
      @williamsteveling8321 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dustinbrueggemann1875 even so, that would allow some pretty hard UV to be created. It would be fairly impressive.

  • @andreyv116
    @andreyv116 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Based on the intense violet white, I'm wondering what the emission spectrum was since there was almost certainly a substantial UV component

  • @hanbuwalda8126
    @hanbuwalda8126 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This video should be called EPIC. Fior me in my teaching practice it is a breakthrough. Peter and team thank you so much. You all really rock chemistry demo's. Please introduce more questions at the end for students to wonder and think and structure their knowledge on this type of reaction.

  • @nick4819
    @nick4819 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Holy hell Im in love with that periodic table at the beginning. Its so cool to actually be able to see each element.

    • @absurdengineering
      @absurdengineering 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The biggest “wow” for me was that the periodic table has a vial of fluorine. Someone must have spent a lot of time making that happen. You can’t just put fluorine into a vial - it’ll eat its way out. That glass must have been treated so that there’d be a passivated layer that had some self-healing properties. Kudos to whoever pulled that off. It takes lots of care. Contaminants will act as bridges that will cut through passivation and make a hole in the glass eventually (or quickly, depending on what the contaminant is). This is the sort of stuff where plain old dust from the air can mess things up.
      Unless it’s just a vial filled with air. Should be easy to test - fluorine has lots of absorption lines in the visible spectrum, a hand held spectrophotometer should be enough to tell perhaps. Even stronger lines in IR if I recall right.

  • @spacelem
    @spacelem 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    As a kid doing chemistry at school in the late 90s, this is the reaction I wanted to see!

  • @CapitalistCrusader
    @CapitalistCrusader 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Chemical reactions happen more slowly at cold temperatures. I'd love to see what happens when a pin made of cesium is slowly pushed into a small disk of frozen fluorine while all this is submerged in liquid helium. Would it react with a simple touch? or would a little twisting of the pin be needed?

    • @torydavis10
      @torydavis10 ปีที่แล้ว

      that sounds like boom

    • @circusitch
      @circusitch 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It would create the molecule CsFHe. That’s what they make that impervious super tough plastic used to seal any household product that you can never open.

  • @TheRoyalInstitution
    @TheRoyalInstitution  11 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Dr Wothers made a comment about this on Twitter stating: "Before anyone asks, francium is not as reactive as caesium. Cs has lowest ionization energy of all elements"

  • @Auriam
    @Auriam 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Incredible! You earned another subscriber!

  • @MrInitialMan
    @MrInitialMan 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love that line: "I thought you were totally and utterly mad."

  • @acronus
    @acronus 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    The most electronegative combined the least electronegative, producing the strongest bond?

  • @stagdragon3978
    @stagdragon3978 9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    2:18 "we all know how hard it is to cause this to react with the oxygen in the air" (actually it's pretty damn simple)
    "imagine how easy it would be if it was fluorine."
    (some people just want to watch to world burn...)

  • @rajshuklarajshukla8470
    @rajshuklarajshukla8470 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank u very much for making this video

  • @Oldmankingspiffy
    @Oldmankingspiffy 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Cody has the been research into caesium fluorine reaction jets?

  • @Franciumflourine
    @Franciumflourine 9 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    caesium is the most reactive? first a spelling mistake I've had to live with for the past ten years and now this

    • @Franciumflourine
      @Franciumflourine 8 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      +Matty Brumby im not sure what im meant to be getting over...

    • @johnyboytown
      @johnyboytown 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      +smzig he called it alumium first.

    • @ModMINI
      @ModMINI 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +Matty Crumby It's also pronounced Leister. :-)

    • @ModMINI
      @ModMINI 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +Matty Brumby I didn't know and many others are probably surprised as well.

    • @robertafettuccine
      @robertafettuccine 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Actually it's pronounced Lester

  • @sharpfang
    @sharpfang 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Now that you got cesium fluoride, does it make the most non-reactive substance ever, considering there's nothing more reactive to displace any of the ions?

    • @mikatshow3932
      @mikatshow3932 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      a great question out here!

    • @joshuasamuel2122
      @joshuasamuel2122 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @sharpfang No, but I think it makes it the most ionic compound in the world. As for reactivity, I bet it would still react with water to produce some hydrogen fluoride, so it's far from unreactive.

  • @mcmh9523
    @mcmh9523 11 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Beautiful.
    I've never seen this before and it's so amazing.

  • @ViewingInterests36
    @ViewingInterests36 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Could there be some useful application for this reaction? Could this be used in rocket propulsion (once in space)?

  • @InDeepPudding
    @InDeepPudding 8 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    ITS FLUORINE NOT FLURINE GODDAMNIT

    • @nightangel7239
      @nightangel7239 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      It's a lift, not an elevator.

    • @iTracti0n
      @iTracti0n 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Night Angel That's a dumb name for something that elevates you. You would think you'd all it a "lifter" because it lifts you but no.

    • @xenofurmi
      @xenofurmi 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You know, tomacco tomacco.

    • @BaddaBigBoom
      @BaddaBigBoom 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Potayto potahto. tomayto tomahto ...let's call the whole thing off.

    • @RWBHere
      @RWBHere 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It's a footpath, not a sidewalk.
      It's a road, not a pavement.
      It's a car, not an automobile.
      It's an aeroplane, not an airplane.
      It's a torch, not a flashlight.
      It's a shop, not a store.
      It's English. Spoken by English people. U/S citizens usually speak American English.
      Therein lies the truth; we're two nations, separated by a common language. Arguing about it is pointless, and will cause ill-feeling and xenophobia.
      We're all human beings, and our languages should be used for communication, not for dissent.

  • @thelanner22b
    @thelanner22b 10 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Can someone explain why some people say Cesium is more reactive than Francium? I know Francium is radioactive and decay so fast but that's not the reason. Cesium has less ionization energy than francium (that may be the cause)

    • @dancingq1729
      @dancingq1729 10 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      It might not be. Its just we can't really make enough francium for long enough to do anything with it.

    • @dancingq1729
      @dancingq1729 10 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Alternatively, relativistic contractions in this low area of the periodic table lead to a shrinking of the increase in atomic radii expected down the group, slightly reducing reactivity.

    • @dancingq1729
      @dancingq1729 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I am, well aware of that. Though I would link it more to a relatavisitc effect caused by the electrons in a 7s orbital having a non zero probability at the nucleus combined with a high nuclear charge and the electrons moving close to the speed of light causing a contraction. The lanthanide contraction is more appropriate to the 6p elements, as by 7s they have become basically core-like.

    • @Sam-vg4rj
      @Sam-vg4rj 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Isobel Priest i'm a little bit confused, can't the decay be stopped if it doesn't have contact with certain substances, e.g if it was left in a vacuum?

    • @dancingq1729
      @dancingq1729 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Decay of what? The fact its less reactive is a physical property, the orbitals of the electrons are set. Radioactive decay: also no, half-life is a property of the molecule, and not generally reaction dependent.

  • @wrichik_basu
    @wrichik_basu 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    really interesting. will it be possible to record a spectrum of the emitted light? I would like to see what frequencies are emitted other than the visible light.

    • @MrMoriarty100
      @MrMoriarty100 ปีที่แล้ว

      Er... Isn't that the reason Leicester has a similar mutant population to the Chernobyl fallout zone?! 🤔

  • @secondthought2320
    @secondthought2320 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What are the two elements actually used for?

  • @aviator696
    @aviator696 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I admit I am surprised at how anti-climactic that was. I expected a violent explosion from those two. Granted, I am grateful for the video. I've always wanted to try it, but I expected to blow my face off so I haven't.

    • @Zincoshine-
      @Zincoshine- 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The reason why there's no explosion is because there is no hydrogen being produced as is the case when you drop a period 1 element into water.

  • @Blockio1999
    @Blockio1999 9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Such...a...beutiful...flame...

  • @SwagDawgz
    @SwagDawgz 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    what equipment do you need

  • @toamaori
    @toamaori 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    it looked like tiny lightning bolts right at the beginning... would that be electrons moving between the Cs and F atoms?

  • @iamthescrub3709
    @iamthescrub3709 9 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Skip to 4:10 for actual reaction.

    • @MichaelTheRead
      @MichaelTheRead 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      So the first 4 minutes of the video are completely unnecessary. Typical.

    • @JamesFreedmanIsVeryCool
      @JamesFreedmanIsVeryCool 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MichaelTheRead i found them pretty interesting

  • @HomeDistiller
    @HomeDistiller 8 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Wow dumb it down some more! Why not go though a little bit of theory at the end.. Like what compound did it make and why

    • @1luv4j
      @1luv4j 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +HomeDistiller Cs+F=CsF

    • @PaulA-pd2fe
      @PaulA-pd2fe 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      +1luv4j
      2Cs + F2 => 2CsF*

  • @ij4868
    @ij4868 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I was expecting a explosion like g1 metals reacting with water. Could this caesium with fluorine reaction be done with a bit of pure oxygen mixed in.

  • @elgaen555
    @elgaen555 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video, thanks for the demonstration! :)

  • @toolman4441
    @toolman4441 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    WOW Fluorine and Caesium are pretty salty when they meet each other

  • @AM-id5ry
    @AM-id5ry 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    3:59 You’re welcome

  • @blindandwatching
    @blindandwatching 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    what does the Cesium flouride look like?

  • @timothypryor7952
    @timothypryor7952 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    So 2 questions, what do these elements turn into after the reaction, and how much heat energy is produced by the reaction?

    • @jennatolls175
      @jennatolls175 ปีที่แล้ว

      First question - CsF, caesium fluoride

  • @Nahh13579
    @Nahh13579 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Is francium just a theory or does it actually exist?

    • @ReubenLL28
      @ReubenLL28 8 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      +Jermaine Lee Of course Francium exists, there couldn't just be a random gap in the periodic table.

    • @canis_majoris
      @canis_majoris 8 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      +Jermaine Lee Francium only has a half life of like 45 minutes. If you need Francium, you have to get some radioactive Thorium. As it decays, it turns into Francium briefly and then that Francium turns into other things. Not terribly useful!

    • @stagdragon3978
      @stagdragon3978 8 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      +Jermaine Lee essentialy it exists but it's one of those elements that just doesn't like to exist.

    • @EpicB
      @EpicB 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Jermaine Lee It exists. Technically.

    • @rwrunning1813
      @rwrunning1813 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It exists, technically and literally. You just won't be able to find much.

  • @saqibrehmat9384
    @saqibrehmat9384 10 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Periodic table is made brilliantly

  • @JoeA1974
    @JoeA1974 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Absolutely fascinating. Thank you

  • @Okaythankyoubye
    @Okaythankyoubye 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The grin on my face while i was watching this. Priceless!!

  • @douglascheng9794
    @douglascheng9794 8 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    rt if u came here after googling francium and fluorine

  • @hex6t6
    @hex6t6 8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Y'all better hope the FineBros aren't watching...

  • @vinylsingleman
    @vinylsingleman 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    What I'd like to see in the reaction between solid cesium and solid iodine. Will the two generate enough heat on mere touch to react and explode?

  • @WildBillCox13
    @WildBillCox13 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow! Thanks for posting!

  • @peterpan260983
    @peterpan260983 7 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    The tube didn't even explode. Lame.

    • @DGFishRfine1
      @DGFishRfine1 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      peterpan260983 to be fair, they planned it that way... Escaping fluorine has a good chance of turning to gaseous hydrofluoric acid, and caesium more-or-less blows up on contact w/moisture, so escaping reagents here could've very easily been deadly.
      (I do agree, it looked a bit anticlimactic, however)

  • @allencrider
    @allencrider 10 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    It didn't blow up!

    • @taicanium
      @taicanium 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      D:

    • @fft2020
      @fft2020 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      I was actually expecting that too...

  • @owlredshift
    @owlredshift ปีที่แล้ว

    Oh, how I do wish you captured spectra! Wonderful regardless

  • @acidstar11
    @acidstar11 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    What happens when you take the most electronegitive and positive elements florine and cesium and combined "bond" it with the most symmetrical anchor of carbon 12 rather then trying to get a reaction with out the carbon atom present? On the molecular level of course or well atomic level I suppose.

  • @WizKid2409
    @WizKid2409 11 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The longest half-life of any isotope of francium is about 22 minutes. It's likely that a few people that have studied it in depth have seen a milligram, but not too many. At any given time, there is approximately 20-30 grams naturally in the entire world.

  • @BaddaBigBoom
    @BaddaBigBoom 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I wonder if the end product contains something that could be called 'caesium fluoride' and if so, I'd be curious to find out its properties.

    • @doggo8730
      @doggo8730 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      BaddaBigBoom halogens do create salts when they react with metals, so hypothetically yes, cesium flouride would be a salt.

  • @buddhistandcatholic
    @buddhistandcatholic 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dr. Wothers i loved this video. I only have 1 complaint. How much cesium in grams was that sample?

  • @ayeshashakeel2094
    @ayeshashakeel2094 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    can any one tell me that alkali metals or halogens which one is the most reactive group?

  • @KororaPenguin
    @KororaPenguin 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Would those safety procedures be enough for a cesium-FOOF reaction?

  • @jordanwilliams5849
    @jordanwilliams5849 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does anyone know the wavelength of light produced?

  • @highgroundproductions8590
    @highgroundproductions8590 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent video quality

  • @Hozay1234
    @Hozay1234 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    what were the by-products of the reaction

  • @HighlanderNorth1
    @HighlanderNorth1 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    So what was the result of the reaction? What compound are you left with?

  • @DevilDolphin734
    @DevilDolphin734 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Are those electrons jumping between the two elements at the start of the reaction?

  • @hamishwearmouth1036
    @hamishwearmouth1036 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    really enjoyed this video

  • @jadynfriio7119
    @jadynfriio7119 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    this helps a lot with my project

  • @drrocketman7794
    @drrocketman7794 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    A genuine, honest-to-goodness mad scientist!

  • @WildBillCox13
    @WildBillCox13 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    For curiosity's sake: what quantities were involved?

  • @MasterShot-ke1mr
    @MasterShot-ke1mr 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    How aboot cesium 137? use that in yer reaction.

  • @KineticHyperion
    @KineticHyperion 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is the symbol and word equation for this reaction?????

  • @andrewdavis5386
    @andrewdavis5386 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What are the products of the reaction? I'm surprised they failed to mention that.

  • @dinosaurcomplaints2359
    @dinosaurcomplaints2359 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is the product of the reaction? What are it’s properties? What could it be used for?

  • @tutentDotCom
    @tutentDotCom 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Curious (and perhaps showing my inexperience) but what's stopping the Cesium from reacting with the glass tube it came in? Was it also in a vacuum?

  • @DeltaEpsilon7787
    @DeltaEpsilon7787 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I've just realized something. This music when they were setting up the caesium, it's used in SpaceChem as the background music.

  • @saket174
    @saket174 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video!

  • @Sovereign01
    @Sovereign01 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I was expecting something a bit more spectacular between the two elements that would most readily react with one another, I'd always wondered what it would look like.

  • @chandramanidhamala9598
    @chandramanidhamala9598 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice explanation

  • @marccoffey291
    @marccoffey291 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    what is the product of the reaction? If it follows the same trend as the alkali metals and chlorine gas then I would guess at cesium fluoride? Also Its a bit of topic but my teacher has been unable to answer this question and I can't find a straight answer on the internet. What would be the reaction products of elemental boron with either elemental bromine and elemental fluorine? Thank you.

  • @Metal_Master_YT
    @Metal_Master_YT 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This video really deserves more attention and likes.

  • @scottlarson4407
    @scottlarson4407 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is final product? CsF?

  • @abhijithlakshman9654
    @abhijithlakshman9654 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks a lot! This was a reaction i really wanted to see :)

  • @RONWOLPA
    @RONWOLPA 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    How much was the temperature of this reaction ?

  • @norvillerodgersspeaks
    @norvillerodgersspeaks 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you explain why francium is less reactive than ceasium, and then do some francium with the fluorine anyway just for shits and grins?

    • @PelycheeaceRA
      @PelycheeaceRA 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      1) Francium is less reactive due to relativistic effects. The electrons in very heavy elements reach significant fractions of the speed of light. This leads to them "orbiting" closer to the nucleus, and consequently they react less easily.
      2) Francium is extremely radioactive. It decays so quickly that its impossible to collect enough of it to do such an experiment.

  • @mymessyworkbenchneedstobec4689
    @mymessyworkbenchneedstobec4689 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wonderfull example of more energy is released when a bond is make, than a bond being broken.

  • @tokajileo5928
    @tokajileo5928 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    what is the music at the end?

  • @artman40
    @artman40 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    How stable is caesium fluoride?