@@MathiasVIKING0403 _"Narrative driven"_ Ah, so you're bitter that your precious Bible-despising, Darwin-cheerleading, God-hating narrative did not drive it.
@@MathiasVIKING0403 Narrative driven... just like Darwinism, Covid policy, Climate Crisis, Eugenics, ESG adoption, DEI policies, and all things anti-farming, anti-mining, ant-drilling, anti-population, and anti-life?
@@alltimeislikethepresent who's bitter? You got all that emotion from two words? Your assumptions that you accertainned are needless to say, incorrect!!! From your statement,one could assume that you think I'm an atheist?
@@mattk6719 wow you people are thick! I posted a two word comment and got multiple messages assuming that I'm referring to the (religion narrative) 😂! How about try asking someone what angle they are coming from, instead of jumping to conclusions that you could not possibly know? I'm a very proud Christian Man! Deacon, Bible study leader. ! THE NARRATIVE WOULD BE GOVERNMENT DRIVEN !
Otzi the Iceman was buried under a glacier, he had died in the spring and was only the fact when he fell , it was in a bit of a hole or depression in the ground. Thus the reason he wasn’t crushed to pieces by the glacier then after the glacier melted he was found perfectly intact, most of the damage to him was done by the people digging him out. I always ask the Climate Change Alarmists Who was there first? Otzi or the glacier? They get all twisted up in knots trying to explain something that they know they can’t without destroying their own narrative
Er, no. Otzi died on top of a glacier and was subsequently covered with snow which turned to ice and preserved him where he fell. He wasn't covered by or moved by the glacier. The interesting thing is his body, clothes, wooden handled tools all date to approx. 3200 BC which is 800 years *before* the supposed Noah's Flood. I wonder why the Flood which destroyed the whole surface of the globe somehow missed this poor soul? 🙂
@@ababbit7461 From scientific studies of Otzi and his belongings. A good overview is the recent paper *[The Iceman : Life scenarios and pathological findings from 30 years of research on the glacier mummy "Ötzi"]* The original is in German but English translations are available online. Where did you get the 12,500 to 13,000 year ago dates for the Flood? Just curious too. 🙂
@@samburns3329well I can point out places across the world that are proof of a flood. Look at the Dinosaurs bone beds out west. Meters and meters thick with articulated Dinosaurs and jumbled up bones by the thousands. A secular scientists wrote a paper about articulated Dinosaurs and hoe they had to have drown as that mechanism is not only what preserved the bones but caused the articulation of the body. The death spasm as it tried breathing but died caused the muscles to actuate or draw up to that nice circle. That area extend half the size of the continent of north america The have the same type thing over seas as well. Huge areas of bent Rock layers that when looked at under a microscope don't show extreme heat and pressure formed it. So it had to be put down wet. Trees and fossils that go through multiple layers, that were supposed to be put down over millions of years. Dinosaurs soft tissue that is from 65 to 500 million years old lol. We know by experiments the proteins in the soft tissue cannot last for more then a few thousand years period. No mechanism exists to allow them to last millions of years. If you really look at the facts and read them without presuppositions you'll come to a smart conclusion. Academia has lied and pushed off beliefs that don't fit with the facts. You have a lot of waking up to do. You need to actually look at the evidence on both sides of the argument not just what supports your beliefs. There are far more inconsistencies with a no flood argument then there are with a flood.
@@vikingskuld There are lots of places in the world with evidence of local floods, even big ones. What you *don't* have is evidence all these local floods *happened at the same time* only 4400 years ago. 🙂
@@francisbusa1074 The Planes Of Fame Air Museum in Chino is an amazing place. The big difference between them and lots of other aircraft museums is most of their planes are still in flying condition. They do a big airshow every year and you can see all sorts of rare warbirds - WW1, WW2, Korea, Vietnam. Lots of non U.S. planes too. Worth a trip if you're ever in the L.A. area.
@@settledown444 _"What in the world does Bill Nye have to do with this??"_ Um, Bill Nye is a popular, Bible-despising detractor of young-earth creationism, no? And this creationist video presents information inimical to his anti-creationism ideology. The OP seems to have been sarcastically pointing out the shameful fact that many nowadays revere people like Bill Nye, a propagandist of so-called "science", and wait on such a Darwin cheerleader's pronouncement as to how they should think about the information presented in this video.
This also explains why climate cultists very selectively cherry pick locations, time periods, and data points. My son’s science book showed a rocky area in Greenland or Iceland. I found it on Google Earth and when zooming out saw it was a small, isolated area in an area absolutely covered with ice with 1,000 miles of ice in every direction. It was likely bare due to wind erosion.
I remember seeing a few of the salvaged parts from "Glacier Girl" when she was fresh out of the ice. They brought her, in pieces, to EAA that year and had her on display. And then to see her restored and flown at EAA several years later is wonderous. The whole Glacier Girl story is very cool. Look it up!
+@maritvansanten The little corner of Greenland where the planes came to rest gets a lot of lake-effect snow from the ocean every winter. So the snow accumulation for that area averaged six feet a year, and this would have put a lot of compacted ice on top of the aircraft over time.
Absolutely brilliant. Just goes to show how Anything can be cherry picked, wilfully misinterpreted and misrepresented to support anyone's particular superstition. Ardderchog 🏴
Seriously? The "Lost Flight" of two B-17s and six P-38s in Greenland crash landed very close to the coast in an area which gets 1-2 m of snowfall a year. Ice cores from Greenland Ice Core Chronology project (i.e GICC21) are taken far inland where the average snowfall is 7cm a year and seasonal summer dust bands are highly visible in the core samples.
Not true at all snow and precipitation fluctuate every year and there is no way one can say that precipitation remains the same over 500 to 4000 years, don't fool yourself
@@settledown444 _" What do Greenland's name and the many dozens of validated scientific methods for determining age have to do with one another??"_ Have you "scientifically validated" any claims, or are you just parroting claims made by anti-creationism talkers whom you, being their co-devotee against creationism, reverently call "science"?
If you take a huge block of ice and set it on a metal grate in a freezer,it will eventually pass thru the grate as if the grate were not even there. This is because the pressure of the ice actually causes the ice to melt slightly,just like ice under the blade of an iceskate,which eventually leads to the block of ice going completely thru the grate seemingly unchanged....now put the mass of a huge plane on a frozen ice shelf...same principle...the plane's weight melts the ice slightly and the plane sinks slowly, refreezing the ice as the plane sinks deeper. This is science fact. Do Your Own Research as this "phenomenon" is well documented. MYSTERY SOLVED LET THAT SINK IN 🔥🔥🔥😎
Hmm. With that logic, the planes should have passed upwards through the ice. You're talking about ice moving downwards, not the metal grate moving downwards. Try again. You must have gone to college to learn that.
I think someone doesn't understand the density of glacier ice. Curious though if that were the case, there should be an obvious disruptive trail through the ice above it in terms of displaced sediments and whathaveyou that the plane would have had to move through. Science would dictate it would have left a plane shaped path of newer ice between it and the surface.
@@hikingphotog Actually,the science behind this phenomenon dictates that it happens over a long enough of a period that (as indicated in the ice block experiments where the block passes thru unchanged)it happens so slowly that no wake or eddy currents are created to leave any perceptible changes. When the plane was dug up,they weren't looking for any confirmation or dismissal of this phenomenon,they were interested in other observations. They do however retain the original ice cores from the area above and around the site. You could easily contact those involved and request them to examine those cores in further pursuit of this debate or it can easily be settled here by the Occam's Razor principle....the simplest explanation is generally the most correct explanation. 🔥🔥🔥😎👍
Agreed,thermodynamics.Any source of compression generates proportional heat,where any manner of expansion causes cooling.The mass of the plane would lower the melting point of the ice,liquifying a layer immediately below.This would add to sinking rate,compounded by additional snows over the decades.
I find it amazing to hear Christians buy into cosmic evolution and biological evolution, neither of which are in the Bible. Imagine if you will a God who is powerful and wise enough to create the entire universe, and all the diversity of life, using literally nothing other than speaking. Now imagine such a wise God forgetting how He created the universe because Big Bang. There is no center position. Pick a lane. I choose God because the real science keeps pointing to God.
Amen. You'll never hear evolutionists mention even a possibility of God but some alleged Christians will compromise and try to shoehorn evolution into Genesis because of social pressure. Not me. Genesis 1:1 explains it all.
Still waiting for your analysis on thousands of feet of flood basalts around the world, lying ABOVE fossil bearing sedimentary layers. Timing??? Gotta have an answer. What is your theory?
How in the world did this guy go from "the Gulf current supplies moist air to southern Greenland causing 5 feet of snow a year to fall" to "this was *global* and was responsible for all the deep ice we see everywhere"??? Talk about your disconnected non-sequiturs.
During the Flood the volcanic activity heated the ocean . When the land was lifted after the flood and the ocean basins formed the land was cooler than before , warmer oceans = more precipitation . Cooler land masses = means snow hung out for longer periods until a 4000 foot ice sheet covered parts of the Northern Hemisphere. When things regained their equilibrium and temperatures warmed up , the melting ice carved the features like Grand Canyon through the wet sediment
You wrote: _"How in the world did this guy go from "the Gulf current supplies moist air to southern Greenland causing 5 feet of snow a year to fall" to "this was global and was responsible for all the deep ice we see everywhere"???"_ Vardiman said (2:02): _"[T]his is a small-scale event that would produce a five-fold increase in the amount of precipitation _*_in just that southern part of Greenland,_*_ and accumulate that amount of ice."_ See what he said? "IN JUST THAT SOUTHERN PART OF GREENLAND". Clearly, he did _not_ say that the fifty-year, post-WWII, southern-coast-of-Greenland-localized event he was describing was (to quote _your_ (not Vardiman's) words) _"responsible for all the deep ice we see everywhere"._
@@alltimeislikethepresent Why did the video claim this was a *GLOBAL* phenomenon unless he was implying it was responsible for all the post-Flood snow?
@@jwsanders1214 Nice story completely unsupported by any scientific evidence and disproven by virtually everything we know about geology and meteorology. 🙂
@@samburns3329 _"Why did the video claim this was a GLOBAL phenomenon unless he was implying it was responsible for all the post-Flood snow?"_ Claim WHAT "was a GLOBAL phenomenon"? Specify exactly what you are referring to by your pronoun "this".
Is this like the Onion in which the narrative is so absurd that it’s laughable? I love how he thinks that this one incident is evidence of a global phenomenon.
Theists want their fairy tail to be so true they'll go to all sorts of ridiculous lengths to try and prove their belief. I still believe that if a heaven, an after life, was never part of this story, way less people would want to believe it. If you ask me, heaven sounds just as bad as hell. All those bloody relatives you have to meet and indulge in boring conversations with. Out of curiosity, how far back on the family tree do you go in heaven? Do you eventually meet our original mother and father, Adam and Eve?
Beyond ridiculous - An Aeroplane hitting the ice is likely to penetrate a fair distance into the ice, and then sink further over time (Lightnings being made of metal) so its not a surprize its found deep in a glacier. Any geologist worth his salt understands how the layers of snow compress into ice over time, and if as this incredulous video is trying to suggest hundreds of feet of ice were actually laid down over the last 80 years, we would have noticed the incredible increase in snowfall required......in these times of warming climate and receding glaciers. Epic fail would be too kind, this is wilful deceit, but we'd expect nothing less from these people.
@@thegrindeveryday9408 details apart, the point of this video is to hoodwink the gullible into thinking the Glacials were a recent phenomenon rather the multi-event cycle of the last 2 million plus years, which fits not well with an organisation trying assert the Earth is only six thousand years old.
@@thegrindeveryday9408 The ones who missed all the details are these muppets in the video. This was a Kent Hovind claim that I researched. The ice cores that go back 600,000 years are on the continent and are correlated using numerous other methods than just counting feet or rings.
Roy, if "Glacier Girl" (as the aircraft is now known) had penetrated deeply into the snow, how did its crew get out? How did its structure survive well enough to be repairable (it's now restored and it has been flown)? The evidence doesn't support a deep burial during the crash landing, but rather a deliberate emergency landing with the landing gear raised, allowing it to slide to a stop, remaining largely at the surface until after the crew were found and rescued (cooling to sub-freezing would've been complete within a few hours, so after that, any further deepening of the aircraft would've only been from its own weight (minimal effect due to the large surface area taking the weight, resulting in low surface pressure, and very little compaction of the snow under the aircraft after the landing), and snow being deposited over the aircraft. The fact that many feet of ice formed above it is indicative of large amounts of snowfall in the area where it was ditched. It doesn't necessarily mean there was a comparable amount of snow deposited all over Greenland (as someone else has pointed out, inland there's considerably less snowfall per year). Sorry, but your comment only shows that you don't know what you're talking about.
Wow, great analysis. Really provides a good example that current "accepted" ice age and global heating models are grossly inadequate.
Narrative driven
@@MathiasVIKING0403 _"Narrative driven"_
Ah, so you're bitter that your precious Bible-despising, Darwin-cheerleading, God-hating narrative did not drive it.
@@MathiasVIKING0403 Narrative driven... just like Darwinism, Covid policy, Climate Crisis, Eugenics, ESG adoption, DEI policies, and all things anti-farming, anti-mining, ant-drilling, anti-population, and anti-life?
@@alltimeislikethepresent who's bitter? You got all that emotion from two words? Your assumptions that you accertainned are needless to say, incorrect!!!
From your statement,one could assume that you think I'm an atheist?
@@mattk6719 wow you people are thick! I posted a two word comment and got multiple messages assuming that I'm referring to the (religion narrative) 😂!
How about try asking someone what angle they are coming from, instead of jumping to conclusions that you could not possibly know?
I'm a very proud Christian Man! Deacon, Bible study leader. !
THE NARRATIVE WOULD BE GOVERNMENT DRIVEN !
Otzi the Iceman was buried under a glacier, he had died in the spring and was only the fact when he fell , it was in a bit of a hole or depression in the ground.
Thus the reason he wasn’t crushed to pieces by the glacier then after the glacier melted he was found perfectly intact, most of the damage to him was done by the people digging him out.
I always ask the Climate Change Alarmists Who was there first? Otzi or the glacier?
They get all twisted up in knots trying to explain something that they know they can’t without destroying their own narrative
Er, no. Otzi died on top of a glacier and was subsequently covered with snow which turned to ice and preserved him where he fell. He wasn't covered by or moved by the glacier. The interesting thing is his body, clothes, wooden handled tools all date to approx. 3200 BC which is 800 years *before* the supposed Noah's Flood. I wonder why the Flood which destroyed the whole surface of the globe somehow missed this poor soul? 🙂
@@samburns3329 Noah's flood happened 12,500 to 13,000 years ago, not less than 5100 to 5200 years ago.. Where did you get 3200 BC? Just currious.
@@ababbit7461 From scientific studies of Otzi and his belongings. A good overview is the recent paper
*[The Iceman : Life scenarios and pathological findings from 30 years of research on the glacier mummy "Ötzi"]*
The original is in German but English translations are available online.
Where did you get the 12,500 to 13,000 year ago dates for the Flood? Just curious too. 🙂
@@samburns3329well I can point out places across the world that are proof of a flood. Look at the Dinosaurs bone beds out west. Meters and meters thick with articulated Dinosaurs and jumbled up bones by the thousands. A secular scientists wrote a paper about articulated Dinosaurs and hoe they had to have drown as that mechanism is not only what preserved the bones but caused the articulation of the body. The death spasm as it tried breathing but died caused the muscles to actuate or draw up to that nice circle. That area extend half the size of the continent of north america The have the same type thing over seas as well. Huge areas of bent Rock layers that when looked at under a microscope don't show extreme heat and pressure formed it. So it had to be put down wet. Trees and fossils that go through multiple layers, that were supposed to be put down over millions of years. Dinosaurs soft tissue that is from 65 to 500 million years old lol. We know by experiments the proteins in the soft tissue cannot last for more then a few thousand years period. No mechanism exists to allow them to last millions of years. If you really look at the facts and read them without presuppositions you'll come to a smart conclusion. Academia has lied and pushed off beliefs that don't fit with the facts. You have a lot of waking up to do. You need to actually look at the evidence on both sides of the argument not just what supports your beliefs. There are far more inconsistencies with a no flood argument then there are with a flood.
@@vikingskuld There are lots of places in the world with evidence of local floods, even big ones. What you *don't* have is evidence all these local floods *happened at the same time* only 4400 years ago. 🙂
The P-38 that was salvaged was lifted out of the ice and restored. Later she was named "Glacier Girl".
Recovery of a second P-38 "Echo" started in 2019 but was sidetracked by various technical/money issues. To my knowledge the effort is still on hold.
I was lucky enough to see Glacier Girl fly in an air show at Chino CA. about 15 years ago. Magnificent machine!
@@settledown444
You were VERY fortunate, my friend. I have yet to see one myself.
@@samburns3329
Hadn't heard of that. I sure hope that eventually they will get her out. They're a real treasure now.
@@francisbusa1074 The Planes Of Fame Air Museum in Chino is an amazing place. The big difference between them and lots of other aircraft museums is most of their planes are still in flying condition. They do a big airshow every year and you can see all sorts of rare warbirds - WW1, WW2, Korea, Vietnam. Lots of non U.S. planes too. Worth a trip if you're ever in the L.A. area.
Yes, but how many "millions of years down" does Bill Nye think those planes were?
What in the world does Bill Nye have to do with this??
Bill is “ The Science Guy “ not the scientist
@@settledown444 _"What in the world does Bill Nye have to do with this??"_
Um, Bill Nye is a popular, Bible-despising detractor of young-earth creationism, no? And this creationist video presents information inimical to his anti-creationism ideology. The OP seems to have been sarcastically pointing out the shameful fact that many nowadays revere people like Bill Nye, a propagandist of so-called "science", and wait on such a Darwin cheerleader's pronouncement as to how they should think about the information presented in this video.
@@alltimeislikethepresent So the answer is *absolutely nothing.* 🙂
@@settledown444 @settledown444 : _"So the answer is absolutely nothing. 🙂"_
So long as the question is: _"What does @settledown444 know?"_ 😃
This also explains why climate cultists very selectively cherry pick locations, time periods, and data points. My son’s science book showed a rocky area in Greenland or Iceland. I found it on Google Earth and when zooming out saw it was a small, isolated area in an area absolutely covered with ice with 1,000 miles of ice in every direction. It was likely bare due to wind erosion.
Well done the "ice age" is the cover story for the great flood.
No, the Ice Age was a real event that was caused by the Flood.
I remember seeing a few of the salvaged parts from "Glacier Girl" when she was fresh out of the ice. They brought her, in pieces, to EAA that year and had her on display. And then to see her restored and flown at EAA several years later is wonderous. The whole Glacier Girl story is very cool. Look it up!
At the Ark Encounter in Kentucky they have a little diorama of this. It’s amazing.
They also have a diorama of Eve feeding carrots to some velociraptors. AE has an adversarial relationship with reality. 🙂
The Ark Encounter. Dear oh dear. Such a good resource of information for the deluded.
You didn’t even mention that there were HUNDREDS of “annual” rings above them… I thought that was the whole point of the story.
Annual rings in a glacier??
It was a 2 minute video, what were you expecting?
I just came to see if there were any comments or such about finding a man in a blue spandex uniform and a shield with a star on it found
And scrolling for a bit...I wasn't disappointed. Thank you...still humor in the Internet and not all doom and gloom, outrage videos
How many dust/ice layers were found over the aircraft?
Have we documented the changes of the earth during its precession? Just theories?
Thanks for your work👍
Saw the parts of this plane in kissame FL. 20 years ago the supper charger laid on the floor. It was neat to see parts that was 15 feet below the ice
Did it have Steve Rogers on board?
If nobody answers, I'm smelling a cover-up.
Aw, you beat me to it. Captain America was my instant reaction. Good on you. 👍🏻
Love your videos!
I'm very curious how old the ice on southern Greenland is according to scientist...
+@maritvansanten The little corner of Greenland where the planes came to rest gets a lot of lake-effect snow from the ocean every winter. So the snow accumulation for that area averaged six feet a year, and this would have put a lot of compacted ice on top of the aircraft over time.
One of the P-38s was recovered, and fully restored (I believe) and is now Glacier Girl. Many thanks to that wealthy Texan (who else?) who funded this.
It's truelly amazing how mother nature works.
God my friend, God.
Ty..interesting!
This seems to refute the global warming propaganda.
Absolutely brilliant.
Just goes to show how Anything can be cherry picked, wilfully misinterpreted and misrepresented to support anyone's particular superstition.
Ardderchog 🏴
So if global warming is now making this thing visible, how low was the ice when it crashed?
Seriously? The "Lost Flight" of two B-17s and six P-38s in Greenland crash landed very close to the coast in an area which gets 1-2 m of snowfall a year. Ice cores from Greenland Ice Core Chronology project (i.e GICC21) are taken far inland where the average snowfall is 7cm a year and seasonal summer dust bands are highly visible in the core samples.
Not true at all snow and precipitation fluctuate every year and there is no way one can say that precipitation remains the same over 500 to 4000 years, don't fool yourself
@@ankhenaten2 Look up the meaning of the word *average.* Let us know what you find, OK? 🙂
Didn't Greenland get its name from its condition in the recent past. At best we can now conclude all ages are wild guesses
@@johnglad5 What do Greenland's name and the many dozens of validated scientific methods for determining age have to do with one another??
@@settledown444 _" What do Greenland's name and the many dozens of validated scientific methods for determining age have to do with one another??"_
Have you "scientifically validated" any claims, or are you just parroting claims made by anti-creationism talkers whom you, being their co-devotee against creationism, reverently call "science"?
This WWII airplane was found in a glacier.
I'll bet the crew was hungry.
Did they find capt steve rogers inside with a tesseract inside of it? Askin for stan lee
Sorry I can't help it ,,, any sign of Captain America in the p38 ?
Someone had to say it, thank you.
If nobody answers, I'm smelling a cover-up.
Was Captain Rogers in it???
If you take a huge block of ice and set it on a metal grate in a freezer,it will eventually pass thru the grate as if the grate were not even there. This is because the pressure of the ice actually causes the ice to melt slightly,just like ice under the blade of an iceskate,which eventually leads to the block of ice going completely thru the grate seemingly unchanged....now put the mass of a huge plane on a frozen ice shelf...same principle...the plane's weight melts the ice slightly and the plane sinks slowly, refreezing the ice as the plane sinks deeper.
This is science fact. Do Your Own Research as this "phenomenon" is well documented.
MYSTERY SOLVED
LET THAT SINK IN 🔥🔥🔥😎
Hmm. With that logic, the planes should have passed upwards through the ice. You're talking about ice moving downwards, not the metal grate moving downwards. Try again. You must have gone to college to learn that.
I think someone doesn't understand the density of glacier ice. Curious though if that were the case, there should be an obvious disruptive trail through the ice above it in terms of displaced sediments and whathaveyou that the plane would have had to move through. Science would dictate it would have left a plane shaped path of newer ice between it and the surface.
@@hikingphotog Actually,the science behind this phenomenon dictates that it happens over a long enough of a period that (as indicated in the ice block experiments where the block passes thru unchanged)it happens so slowly that no wake or eddy currents are created to leave any perceptible changes. When the plane was dug up,they weren't looking for any confirmation or dismissal of this phenomenon,they were interested in other observations. They do however retain the original ice cores from the area above and around the site. You could easily contact those involved and request them to examine those cores in further pursuit of this debate or it can easily be settled here by the Occam's Razor principle....the simplest explanation is generally the most correct explanation.
🔥🔥🔥😎👍
@@hikingphotog P.S. Ice density plays no role in this phenomenon.😎
Agreed,thermodynamics.Any source of compression generates proportional heat,where any manner of expansion causes cooling.The mass of the plane would lower the melting point of the ice,liquifying a layer immediately below.This would add to sinking rate,compounded by additional snows over the decades.
Hi, very interesting!!!!
Another cold case solved even though the investigation moved at a glacial pace
I find it amazing to hear Christians buy into cosmic evolution and biological evolution, neither of which are in the Bible.
Imagine if you will a God who is powerful and wise enough to create the entire universe, and all the diversity of life, using literally nothing other than speaking.
Now imagine such a wise God forgetting how He created the universe because Big Bang.
There is no center position. Pick a lane. I choose God because the real science keeps pointing to God.
Amen. You'll never hear evolutionists mention even a possibility of God but some alleged Christians will compromise and try to shoehorn evolution into Genesis because of social pressure. Not me. Genesis 1:1 explains it all.
Did they find Steve Rogers in it that actually would be cool, Captain America is back
What was this video’s point? Must have missed it.
Science is way off on telling time by ice layers nd by radio carbon dating.
I have only started watcing this video and already figured out the point.
I sure wish they would go back and get the B17s.
ONE GLASS OF WATER TURNED INTO
FOG CAN SHUT DOWN AN AIRPORT 🌧️
Did they find captain America too?
Was captain America in it?
Ignorance is bliss until ⚖️day we all will have to answer to the Creator 🤔
Was captain america in it😃
Kids there isn’t a god , parents do lie . Ask them to prove it with real evidence.
bUt glAciERs taKe mILlioNs oF yeARs tO fOrM...
But but,.... Global warming
Still waiting for your analysis on thousands of feet of flood basalts around the world, lying ABOVE fossil bearing sedimentary layers. Timing??? Gotta have an answer. What is your theory?
How in the world did this guy go from "the Gulf current supplies moist air to southern Greenland causing 5 feet of snow a year to fall" to "this was *global* and was responsible for all the deep ice we see everywhere"??? Talk about your disconnected non-sequiturs.
During the Flood the volcanic activity heated the ocean . When the land was lifted after the flood and the ocean basins formed the land was cooler than before , warmer oceans = more precipitation . Cooler land masses = means snow hung out for longer periods until a 4000 foot ice sheet covered parts of the Northern Hemisphere. When things regained their equilibrium and temperatures warmed up , the melting ice carved the features like Grand Canyon through the wet sediment
You wrote: _"How in the world did this guy go from "the Gulf current supplies moist air to southern Greenland causing 5 feet of snow a year to fall" to "this was global and was responsible for all the deep ice we see everywhere"???"_
Vardiman said (2:02): _"[T]his is a small-scale event that would produce a five-fold increase in the amount of precipitation _*_in just that southern part of Greenland,_*_ and accumulate that amount of ice."_
See what he said? "IN JUST THAT SOUTHERN PART OF GREENLAND". Clearly, he did _not_ say that the fifty-year, post-WWII, southern-coast-of-Greenland-localized event he was describing was (to quote _your_ (not Vardiman's) words) _"responsible for all the deep ice we see everywhere"._
@@alltimeislikethepresent Why did the video claim this was a *GLOBAL* phenomenon unless he was implying it was responsible for all the post-Flood snow?
@@jwsanders1214 Nice story completely unsupported by any scientific evidence and disproven by virtually everything we know about geology and meteorology. 🙂
@@samburns3329 _"Why did the video claim this was a GLOBAL phenomenon unless he was implying it was responsible for all the post-Flood snow?"_
Claim WHAT "was a GLOBAL phenomenon"? Specify exactly what you are referring to by your pronoun "this".
"Global" ..... and here I thought you guys believed the Bible
Dunning Krueger on full display
Is this like the Onion in which the narrative is so absurd that it’s laughable?
I love how he thinks that this one incident is evidence of a global phenomenon.
Lies Lies lies
Theists want their fairy tail to be so true they'll go to all sorts of ridiculous lengths to try and prove their belief.
I still believe that if a heaven, an after life, was never part of this story, way less people would want to believe it.
If you ask me, heaven sounds just as bad as hell. All those bloody relatives you have to meet and indulge in boring conversations with. Out of curiosity, how far back on the family tree do you go in heaven? Do you eventually meet our original mother and father, Adam and Eve?
Guess you will never know .
Good news for you. You don't have to go to Heaven. Everyone wins.
Old, heavy set ministers standing in mountain snow is funny. Come on brothers, let’s find a setting that is realistic
Beyond ridiculous - An Aeroplane hitting the ice is likely to penetrate a fair distance into the ice, and then sink further over time (Lightnings being made of metal) so its not a surprize its found deep in a glacier. Any geologist worth his salt understands how the layers of snow compress into ice over time, and if as this incredulous video is trying to suggest hundreds of feet of ice were actually laid down over the last 80 years, we would have noticed the incredible increase in snowfall required......in these times of warming climate and receding glaciers. Epic fail would be too kind, this is wilful deceit, but we'd expect nothing less from these people.
Watch it again. You obviously missed all the details while you were typing this comment.
@@thegrindeveryday9408 details apart, the point of this video is to hoodwink the gullible into thinking the Glacials were a recent phenomenon rather the multi-event cycle of the last 2 million plus years, which fits not well with an organisation trying assert the Earth is only six thousand years old.
@@thegrindeveryday9408
The ones who missed all the details are these muppets in the video. This was a Kent Hovind claim that I researched.
The ice cores that go back 600,000 years are on the continent and are correlated using numerous other methods than just counting feet or rings.
Roy, if "Glacier Girl" (as the aircraft is now known) had penetrated deeply into the snow, how did its crew get out? How did its structure survive well enough to be repairable (it's now restored and it has been flown)? The evidence doesn't support a deep burial during the crash landing, but rather a deliberate emergency landing with the landing gear raised, allowing it to slide to a stop, remaining largely at the surface until after the crew were found and rescued (cooling to sub-freezing would've been complete within a few hours, so after that, any further deepening of the aircraft would've only been from its own weight (minimal effect due to the large surface area taking the weight, resulting in low surface pressure, and very little compaction of the snow under the aircraft after the landing), and snow being deposited over the aircraft. The fact that many feet of ice formed above it is indicative of large amounts of snowfall in the area where it was ditched. It doesn't necessarily mean there was a comparable amount of snow deposited all over Greenland (as someone else has pointed out, inland there's considerably less snowfall per year). Sorry, but your comment only shows that you don't know what you're talking about.
@@AutoEngineerVideos Without being there we can only guess at what is likely. The pilot of the lightning will have used his parachute one would guess.