What Caused the Worldwide Flood of Noah's Day? - Dr. Andrew Snelling
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 ส.ค. 2024
- This video segment is from "Beyond Is Genesis History? Vol 1 : Rocks & Fossils," the follow-up to our feature-length film where we explore the impact of the global Flood on the Earth. Check it out on our website: bit.ly/BIGH-1.
Geologist Andrew Snelling explains how the scale of geologic processes, such as volcanic eruptions, was much larger in the past than is observed in the present. He then shows how Catastrophic Plate Tectonics explains how the entire planet was deluged with water in the days of Noah.
Dr. Snelling completed a BS in applied geology at the University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia, graduating with first-class honors in 1975. His PhD in geology was awarded in 1982 by The University of Sydney for his research thesis titled “A Geochemical Study of the Koongarra Uranium Deposit, Northern Territory, Australia.” Dr. Snelling worked for six years in the exploration and mining industries in Tasmania, New South Wales, Victoria, Western Australia, and the Northern Territory, variously as a field, mine, and research geologist. For over ten years, Dr. Snelling was a research consultant to the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organization for an international collaborative research project funded by the U.S. Department of Energy which involved university and government research scientists from the USA, UK, Australia, Japan, Korea, Sweden, Austria and Belgium.
For more information on Dr. Snelling, please go to bit.ly/2zIzOFZ.
----------------------------------------------------
✨ Looking to learn more about Genesis and Creation?
🦕 Visit our blog for helpful articles: bit.ly/3d306R1
🍃 Free Videos: bit.ly/3e1HRgc
🌌 Questions & Answers: bit.ly/3d0EG6T
🔬 Help support the advancement of creation science: bit.ly/genesis...
![[UNCUT] “อภิสิทธิ์” ครม.อุ๊งอิ๊ง แย่งเก้าอี้กันฝุ่นตลบ “ทักษิณ” บงการเอง Iคนดังนั่งเคลียร์I 21ส.ค.67](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/a_b-kItw2jY/mqdefault.jpg)
![[TH] 2024 PMSL SEA W2D2 | Fall | เครื่องร้อน พร้อมลุย](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/JO2_bLow_1Y/mqdefault.jpg)
My reading of the descriptions of the flood in the Bible made it perfectly clear that there were geological cataclysms. This is the best explanation I've ever heard.
The Flintstones cartoon: In one episode Fred and Barney taking their wives on vacation, and Fred and Barney and their wives are standing next to a tiny stream a few feet across with a sign "The Colorado River future site of Grand Canyon". Fred looks at Barney and says: "Why did we stop here? There's nothing great about this tiny stream". Barney replies: "Geologists say in the future it will turn into something really special".
I really wish I could give this more then one thumbs up. Thank you for this presentation. Praise the Lord for godly people who seek and share truth.
Mom 4 Christ
The Bible was never meant to be taken literally...
@@marcocappelli5124 And just which one of the 70 or so authors of the Bible told you that? Perhaps you learned that from one of those highly accurate History Channel specials.
@@gregm6894 The Bible speaks of magic. You don't believe in magic, do you? You don't blindly believe in things just because they are written in a book, do you? You ask for evidence before accepting such things, right?
@@marcocappelli5124 I believe it was meant to be taken literally. What is not meant is for us to make assumptions to fill in the missing parts of the story. That was Professor Hammond's mistake in Jurassic Park. (though tech support I.T. character in the movie believed it was Hammond not paying him enough)
Here are a few examples:
Gen 1:1 God created the Earth. Assumption: He created it from nothing.
Gen 2:7 God created man. Assumption: God also created man's spirit.
Exodus 3:2 Bush burned but not consumed. Assumption: There is a Greek or Hebrew word or character for illuminate.
Thank you, gentlemen. I'm glad I'm not in school these days, I'd be in the office, for sure, bringing this to the classroom.
May our Gracious Father bless you all.🙏🕊️
Thank you for sharing this. It’s wild to think of the forces the earth can bring about and how violent the flood really was.
I don't like wind, storms, or rain. It likely was quite unpleasant aboard the Ark. But at least it provided essential protection.
I imagine Noah and his family would have loved to borrow "inertial dampeners" from _Star Trek._
In the muchinga escapement in Zambia, there is a place in the hills where stones small in size appear to have been polished in a tumbler, they are so smoth and round, as if they were flowing for some time along a with a river, but there is no river. The stones are in a kind of sandwith mixture of gravel, atones, sand, etc .These features are part of what they call the great eidt valley, that exlains the formation of lave vixtorial, lake Tanganyika if you are familiar with this part of adrica you can visit and you might learn a lot of things about that valey
an example of confirmation bias at its best
Love this guy, he explains well.
it is hilarious comedy, I give you that
Wow is it strange that I have believed the exact same thing as this guy ? I’m not a scientist or a college graduate but as a result from reading the Bible and looking a hard core evidence but,I’m on the same page as him
You said your not a scientists so how could you look at and evaluate real scientific evidence ? The bible is not a scientific book, its a book of magic and mythicism and is not supported by science, pseudo science from the two presenters has no real value because they are trying desperately to make science fit an absurd story.
@@jim2003sound revelation. If you believe in God I believe a brilliant mind will have revelations of truth from God if you believe in him. Has to do with faith in something not seen
@@jim2003sound Jim, how would you describe the modern landscape and how it was shaped?
@@bellablue118 We know exactly how the modern landscape was shaped, its not a mystery and hasn't been a mystery for well over a hundred years since we have knowledge and evidence of its evolution and magic is not included. The earth is not an ideal habitat for humans since its a death trap for millions of its inhabitants, it is more suited for marine life because most of it is covered by water.
@@gregkoenig9200 Thank you for responding, may I suggest that faith is not a pathway to truth, you can believe anything on faith as evidenced by the vast number of faiths that abound. Any God that demands worship is hardly worthy of it. The God of the bible is not a particularly good candidate for worship since he has a record of Genocide, he condones slavery and is a vengeful, a narcissistic character who likes to play mind games and is very good at playing hide and seek. No thanks, keep your admiration for those that can cure you when you are ill and feed you when you are hungry, yes your fellow humans who are real and do exists.
I would totally pay to see a computer model of the continents moving and showing what he is discribing.
The Precession of the north star (crossing the galactic plane) causes our climate cycles of continental glaciers with lower sea levels Dwarka atlantis's brought on by E-W Global tsunamis that freeze onto the continents.
Every 13 thousand years our solar system crosses over our galaxies electromagnetic gravitational equator causing E-W Global tsunamis that freeze into the continental glaciers lowering sea levels.
The last time we crossed the galactic plane was the geological younger dryas layer or the hen Gobekli Tepe was buried by 19 different global tsunamis spanning MILLENNIA.
The Galactic Milankovitch cycles cause our Climate Cycles.
Covid like co2 is a lie built upon an inconvenient truth.
The baby boomers who were born enmass 75 years ago are starting to die from the usual suspects of seasonal FLU pneumonia and old age.
Revelations 13 16-18
NO BUYING OR SELLING
Unless you wear the covidiot MASK of the beast. With the mask being a pretext for the final solution heavy metal vaccine.
Jesus loved all races because there is only one race the HUMAN race with only one minority the individual human.
There is one on utube. Hydroplate theory.
You may not have to, oct 2024 you might just witness it first hand. There’s a chance the sun will blast earth with A micro nova. Causing a reset of humanity just like Noahs arc
@@sandersson2813 There was a global flood 4,266 years ago! You can ask God about it when you die!
@@terrenceking5855 4,267 years... get your fucking facts right!
I worked in a cave in Western Pennsylvania in the USA where we dug up fossils in a bed of rock called the Aimes Limestone high on the westernmost ridge of the Appalachian Mountains. There were small shells, trilobites, sea fans, etc. Funny, but there was never any terrestrial animals or human bones or debris as you would expect to find from deposits made from a large scale flooding event. What's more, these life forms appear to have lived in a warm, shallow and calm ocean much like you would see in the tropics today, not in a raging torrent of destruction. Assuming that Noah & co. didn't need to bring marine organisms onto the ark since they were already submerged in water, please explain to me how all the life forms mentioned above which were already in water before the flood have all gone extinct? Plus, how did the limestone itself get formed or other types of metamorphic rocks like marble, how did it get inclined at a 30 degree angle and how did other rock layers like sandstone which can only form in low lying areas get deposited on top of the fossil beds that have no fossils in them at all??
Massive super volcanoes, tectonic plate shift caused by the Chixalub meteor (size of Manhattan) 1 mile deep crater, 5000 ft tsnami, millions of tons of ejecta.
Your limestone layers were put down by the mega sequences (one of 5 that went across N America) marine organisms are first to settle to bottom.
Slam a continental plate into a coastal shore and you get one hell of a collision and uplifting (30%) aint much compared to other mountain ranges.
Step back and put this stuff together, there was one huge global event that hugely changed the surface of the earth
John McNulty - Great questions! Here is something else to ponder... Try to find a single example of limestone forming, INCLUDING THE PART WHERE IT IS TURNING TO STONE, in a shallow, cool sea ANYWHERE ON THE PLANET. It isn't happening anywhere. Where we can find MID-PROCESS COAL forming in the world today? Nowhere. SALT DOMES? OIL DEPOSITS? ORGANIC MATTER BEING LITHIFIED? Resin turning to AMBER?? DOUBLE-TERMINATED CRYSTALS?? PETRIFIED WOOD?? The list goes on and on. NONE of these things are happening or forming anywhere on the face of the planet. How can that be??
These were all processes or products of processes that happened during conditions that only existed during the Global Flood. You cannot find ANY of them happening now. That should bother you and everyone else who was taught that many of these are ongoing processes. They are not. It's a huge assertion! If I'm wrong, it should be easy to prove. If not, maybe everyone needs to start asking more and better questions about the SCIENCE we're being indoctrinated with.
Oh, yeah.. Try to find out how sand actually turns to SANDSTONE. Only explanation?? Miles-deep water and high heat.
@@freemind.. freemind, seriously, stay free and use your mind pls.
@freemind. You are right about oil, coal and limestone deposits not forming on the earth any more. But your reasoning is false. Oil deposits occurred in the early oceans because there was a lack of organisms to consume the dead marine organisms that descended to the sea floor. Millions of years later, a similar circumstance occurred when big tall trees and other flora piled up in swamps before evolution developed organisms that would break down this material. There are places that experienced gigantic flooding like the scab lands of eastern Washington and the massive lake that broke at the end of the ice age in the Great Lakes region. Nowhere is there any evidence that tremendous flooding causes the conditions to form oil, coal, limestone or other deposits like marble or petrified wood which take millions of years to form. Some rocks like sandstones and volcanic rocks do indeed still form today, btw.
@@freemind.. spend some time on the Mt St Helens eruption and the aftermath that ensued. Fossils and coal already in the making as well as a mini grand canyon. Be sure to read the explanations as well
There is no evidence to suggest there was a global flood. None. There is plenty of evidence that we are living on the cooling and dangerous crust of an insignificant rock, orbiting around an insignificant star in a vast and hostile universe. So lets be kind to each other.
You are incorrect. The evidence for a worldwide flood is everywhere.
Open your eyes and look for yourselves good people.
Don't always crack me up that people assume that science and The Bible cannot agree on things and they often point to it took God 7 days to create the Earth but who is to say how long god's day is and then The Bible has been written numerous times reinterpreted from dead languages and written by people with probably some agenda that doesn't necessarily mean it's wholly true it doesn't necessarily mean it's wholly fictional but it is the most red book ever written
And for J. BROWN God created everything in 6 days
and Rested on the 7th which is the Sabbath, he said in the 10 Commandments, on the 4th Commandment he said "Remember the Sabbath day to keep it Holy,
and God days were 24 hour days, It is written For in six days the LORD made the Heavens and the Earth, the Sea, and all that is in them, and rested the seventh day.
Therefore the LORD blessed
Sabbath day and hallowed it. So in other words he made the seventh day HOLY.
He God was using a 24 hour day. There is more in Genesis that Moses explained that God created day and night it all points to our 24 hour day. So don't take my word do your own
Studying and you will see.
Human imagination has always created the quickest easiest answer, and the lack of has always created the quickest and easiest acceptance.
@@NetsarimTheWatchman Great come back. That atheist jerk wants to defend his non theory of the canyon but all he's got is ,"you're wrong & I'm write nanner nanner boo boo".
So...how'd noah forget every type of dinosaur? Also this "geologist" hasn't published a peer-reviewed journal article in 31 yrs? How did black panthers, cougars and kangaroos leave the ark and travle 1000s of miles on land PLUS swim 1000s of miles w/o leaving traces? Where'd noah put food for 2 of every kind of animal? How'd ocean-based life survive if the salt concentration changed? How'd freshwater life survive suddenly salty water? How'd the water salinity change in the ocean and rivers such that life didn't end after the rains?
Every one of your questions has been answered if you'd care to investigate further. My guess is that you aren't looking for the truth. Your worldview is challenged by these SCIENTISTS, so you must attack them.
First off none of the questions are answered. These are no scientists, these are religious whackos lying and deceiving to sell a bronze age fairy tale.@@robbysguitars8223
He needs to identify his presuppositions. Why do you assume Noah forgot every type of dinosaur? Whats the value of a peer reviewed article when all the “peers” are presupposing the same things? How does that advance science when all the scientists are maintaining the same presuppositions?
Literally zero evidence for an ark to begin with much less dinosaurs being alive 5000 yrs ago. Also in science, which the video creator and you clearly do not understand, outcomes are based upon evidence and data. You don't understand your belief in an imaginary cloud daddy has no basis in reality and is devoid of any evidence to back up scientific scrutiny? You don't realize you're presupposing an imaginary friend? You loons are so bad at basic science.@@tacticalant3841
They dig up dinosaurs in places that are not frozen and they have skin,veins,muscle tissue and fat still attached so the time line is a bit off I’d think... so ya they made it thru.
Peer reviewed papers don’t proove anything lol they are a way to silence anyone that steps out of line by discrediting them. How do we have all the invasive species that we have today? I’m talking trees,plants,bugs,animals and fish? 🤦♂️
It happened don’t fight it man because there is nothing wrong with accepting it other than accepting that you have been lied to your whole life.
The amount of energy needed to be released to quickly move the continents would destroy everything on Earth. It could never happen the way he is describing.
In the speculative world everything is possible
Since the timeline for our Earth's cataclysms, Earth's expansion, the timeline for our continents, oceans, mountains, broken and subducted tectonic plates, massive water erosion, the stratified layers of the Grand Canyon, the eruption of dozens of supervolcanoes as thousands of smaller volcanoes erupted all in one night across five continents, the cataclysms known as the Siberian and Deccan Traps, Eltanin and Nuuanu, etc., are all documented in hundreds of historic documents, written in over a dozen languages from all across our Earth - since this timeline is corroborated by thousands of other sources such as the maps of sonar images of landslide debris on the seafloor that displaced massive volumes of seawater which launched colossal tsunami waves that decimated the lands and since this destruction is recorded in old literature and in old documents, speculation, theories, wild imaginings, guessing games, etc., are unnecessary. Those too lazy to do the research deserve to be exposed as the pompous idiots they are.
@@WhirledPublishing I cant tell,....you don’t actually believe all the drivel that guy was spewing, do you???
Just viewing continental shapes can give one a clue of continental drift idea... I love this channel. Fascinating!!
Do you want to be more amazed??? Ok, The Appalachian Mountains are not geology. What Google earth shows is a huge Serpent Dragon same as the one in Morroco but with no legs. Btw it is been written about in the past. Isaiah talks about the one in Morroco fighting the fish and the one on the east coast is the plumed serpent.
@@andreshenriquez3087 Mudfossil University?
Thank you Dr. Snelling for your compelling arguments for a global, catastrophic flood.
This parallels arguments made earlier by young Earth creationists Whitcomb and Morris.
The Genesis Flood: The Biblical Record and its Scientific Implications is a 1961 book by young Earth creationists John C. Whitcomb and Henry M. Morris that, according to Ronald Numbers, elevated young Earth creationism "to a position of fundamentalist orthodoxy."[
Yes, I just recently realized that the 'geologic column' is completely above sea level, yet at the bottom of the column it contains animals that were supposed to be on the sea floor. How could the sea level get that high without a flood?
@@micheleh5269 Good grief!! You fil on even the basic knowledge of geology and how the sea floor can be raised to great heights. The is no flood needed, just the forces of nature.
Where did the water go when the flood was over?
Go to the seacoast. You'll see the water right there.
It must have drained off a flat Earth.....lol
My wife's bath
Psalm 104
Waters have been discovered in lg. amts in depths under the land. ?How deep is wells/groundwater?
I’ve been saying for years, that you can plainly see that the eastern coast of South America, fits like a puzzle piece into west Africa, once being connected.
Actually, look again. It doesn’t fit. North America and Africa another matter. Turn South America 90 degrees and then it fits. It rotated in the flood impact.
@@doctorofart You can plainly see that it does, with much of the edges eroded away.
it was all connected "pangea".
South America actually goes into Antarctica's Ross Sea, while the southern portion of Africa goes into the Weddell Sea. United States still connects to northern Africa though.
@@L2FlyMN You can see that it does. But youve got to be mental to believe that less than 6000 years ago these continents were racing around on the globe . I'm thinking schizo spectrum
Why is it that people living in other areas of the earth have no record of a flood at the time Noah is claimed to have lived.
😂😂😂
Didn't the flood kill everyone else on earth at that time according to the bible?? 🤔
There IS reportedly evidence of flood stories carried down via other cultures, groups of people who traveled and settled the other continents.
The flood is known in 290+ cultures around the world, who doesn't know about it?
I was a Geo-Science major in college. I made good marks in Geology. I understand the schools of thought in Geology, right. However I now totally believe in this “ new/old” presentation. I believe that Genesis is 100% correct.
@@ramptonarsecandle The scientific evidence accumulated over the past twenty or thirty years correlates with the Book of Genesis.
So, as more and more evidence accumulates, the more the Bible looks like a historical account of actual events.
If the Genesis account is applied, it explains numerous geological features that cannot be explained by conventional geological theory, such as the formation of the grand Canyon.
@Lynn Powell So you were a Geo-Science major, eh. And what do your clients think about your views on a 6,000 year old earth? Or is it advisable that, like Dr Snelling, you don’t discuss those particular views with your paying customers,
Sooo I wonder why they ignore literal human writings and depictions that are over 6000 years old and directly speak and show mountains existed well before the Noahidic flood story.
Here is one example. There are Native American examples that show several of our mountains and volcanoes existed well over 7000 years ago.
So here in America we had specific locations that at the time they recorded their information of places that stood over 10,000 or even 12,000 feet of elevation.
So, please do us a favor and go back to the drawing board and figure out how mountains and other locations that were of such high elevations were covered by a flood within even the last 10 to 100 thousand years.
Especially locations we have physical evidences that have been dry deserts for longer than 10,000 years.
And there is also chronological records of historicity made by humans that extend well before the flood story narrative timeline and well far after it... non stop.. how did these people manage to never saw it or experienced it.
you are assuming the dating methods are not being forced to support an older-earth narrative
@@apollo5751 check out some of the more scientific lectures by Kurt Wise ex vid ID xCdt6LjvFvA
Geo-physics and Genomics are destroying the religion of evolution and old-earth fantasy
@@sandersson2813 keep your head in the hole in the ground bro, The study of the human genome already shows that ALL of the human race can be traced back to about three males and less than 10,000 years of generations. The religion of evolution is falling apart
@@sandersson2813 LOL, you can't even explain how random proteins came together much less simple cells becoming complex. Your religion of evolution is amazingly ridiculous to those that scrutinize the details and use common sense
Read the book "Cataclysm!" by Allen & Delair (1997).
It does an excellent job of explaining what happened, & when.
Also, this was a GLOBAL Event! There are OVER 700 stories from around the world about The Flood. One fact they ALL have in common is it was a GLOBAL Flood.
s mc
There's absolutely no evidence of any global flood happening, specially just a few thousand years ago.
@@marcocappelli5124
So then the Grand Canyon was caused by a leaky faucet?
But, ..... who ? ... aside from the eight people that according to the tale, were said to be the ONLY survivors, would be around to record anything, anywhere ???
Also, there were record keeping civilisations scattered across the globe before, during and after this alleged mountain topping flood who it seems did not notice it.
@@PerryMarshallScott
To what fake-history are you referring? Or is it some reference to falsified dating of history to try to make evolution theory look more plausible?
If we start with the 8 survivors of the Great Flood, then that would mean that a lot of the historians came afterward?
So did these historians conveniently use the Pope Gregory (Gregorian) calendar to make our dating easy?
Why is there such deception resistance to the idea seen plainly on my Jewish calendar, that Creation occurred approximately 5784 years ago? No doubt that is probably plus or minus a few years. But nothing like "millions and billions" evolution nonsense.
That is because for any tribe, one of the most frightening events is a flood, which generates legends which are remembered forever. And as the legends are passed from generation to generation they are exaggerated.
Think about a tribe living along the Columbia river when a Missoula Flood ripped through.The legends will last forever.
Tribes living 4000 years ago had no comprehension, about a "globe". And that tiny area they lived in was everything that was. So if they had a flood, the whole world had a flood, because their local area was the whole world
Remember, Adam and Eve were the start of "the whole world", yet when Cain need to leave, he goes to a far land and finds a wife........ ???????
You are concentrating upon things in the Bible which have no value, and likely missing the wisdom you could glean from it
What caused the Grand Canyon and Great plains to rise out of the ocean bottom to a mile high above sea level ? Consider the longevity of man before the flood . The thick clouds above the earth blocked radiation from the sun which limits your lifespan. After the flood , life spans tapered off because the radiation barrier of clouds became sparse .
Paraphrasing the fundamentalists, I say'nothing in the Bible sustains what you say about man's longevity and the sea level.
the term you need, Friend, is "Firmament" 😇🙏 a Dome which covered the sky like a crystal and it sang radio waves in the mist of the morning 🎼🎵
There were likely no clouds preFlood. see also Genesis 2:6 "but a mist went up from the earth and watered the whole face of the ground" ...previously in vs.5 "..it had not rained.."
it was a perfect subterranean sprinkler system which rose from below!
subsequently, those are the pockets of water that The Lord God made burst forth at The Great Flood.
to your question "what caused the Grand Canyon?" is discussed by Dr Wise in another video. but to summarize; During the first sequence of the Flood, layer upon layer upon layer was layed down by monster repeated Mega-tsunami. then rain ash and clouds form, saturating the crystaline "Firmament", expanding it into hydrogen and oxygen and it fell upon the earth in a catclysmic Deluge. covering the tallest Mountain! as the flood waters quickly run off the Canyons like the Grand Canyon and earths current topography form.
see, also, Dr. Carl Baugh and The Creation Science Museum, Glen Rose, TX for a thorough study on this. their website is absolutely full of much needed info for All!
So interesting I love how the Bible always wins
it won NOTHING, lol.... maybe if you idiots read from more than just one book. you wouldn't look like such morons to rational minds.
@@governmentcheese7726 There is another way to look at that.
@@googlesucks2907 no there truly is not. It's wrong, period and only half wits and morons would argue anything else
@@governmentcheese7726 the Bible is made up of many books and accounts of many authors inspired by God. Including the son of God. I’m very fortunate to have my eyes open and can see the big picture. We are all a part of the great story of Jesus Christ. The one perfect being that sacrificed himself for humankind. All we have to do is choose him. This life is nothing more than a resume for the next life. I hope God reveals himself to you in a miraculous way. God bless
@@1jw298 In what sense is this story a real sacrifice if there was no permanent death and it was engineered? The contradictions are mind blowing. And this god will destroy everything so that human souls (the only thing of lasting value) can live in eternity. In what sense is your religion therefore not a nihilist death cult?
YT is messing with subscribers
The dome cracked as well, where do you think all the water came from and where it went?
Audible yawn.
True
Yes sir, the great firmament. The waters above as the waters below. Flat Earth.
Oh yeh the dome ha ha ha 😂
@@johnkiebler963 ha ha flat earth here we go
Man's sinn! The same thing today causes all the consequences of sinn. The great tribulation is very near.
No such thing as sin. No tribulation coming either. Get out there and volunteer and actually make a difference instead of sitting on TH-cam spouting revenge fantasy.
Is it sinn or sin. Another Mandela effect maybe.
God bless you brother sin has indeed wrecked our Earth will be without sin in heaven
@@sandersson2813 the devil has decieved you
have you determined the difference between a cult and religion like Christianity
but fear not it is indeed the only true one. It proves it self pray for revelation friend.
You're in crashing plane and you need your parachute my pal call upon Jesus to show who he is grab your Bible read it
Any moment could be your last we have all broken the commandments and done evil in this world
This is established in your heart
@@sandersson2813 you have a lot of anger for the Lord what's going on with that I promise he loves you.
God can't show you himself because you will just die from seeing him. God doesn't answer prayers at will like my servant
he is master of the universe my prayer is a plea from an adopted son being adopted through christ
The bibles truth can be proven because it predicted history before it even happened in detail do many times it's mathematically ridiculous.
Look up the historicity of the bible most trusted book on our planet the Lord has preserved his word.
Don't trust the bible? Better stop reading Plato Aristotle and Socrates
Scientifically accurate, Genesis states the bottoms of the oceans split open causing the flood; naturally it rained as well.
Scientifically accurate? You must have witnessed it.😂😂😂😂😂
@@davehendricks4824 must be anothee flat earth researcher
Dave Hendricks - Scoffer? What science can you contribute to rebut Snelling or Austin or other PhD geologists? Paradigm shifts in understanding are always met with skepticism.
gmailuser - "obviously just a silly story". The only thing obvious here is that you've never read the story in the four chapters of Genesis 6 to 9. You can choose to disregard it, but you cannot do two things: 1) convince anyone it is "silly", and 2) scientifically discredit it.
gmailuser - "the legend was taken from other older fairytales". Prove it. Since no Babylonian, Chaldean, Persian, Egyptian, or any other culture pre-dates the descendants of Noah, those legends and myths you talk about are falsified knock-offs of the original, historical account of Noah. If you compare Genesis 6-9 with any of the ancient flood myths, the difference is immediately obvious to all but the most diehard atheists.
How does the Younger Dryas Impact figure into that explanation? The Younger Dryas Impact vaporized 20,000 cubic miles (for an impact effect 100 miles across, on two-mile thick ice) of ice in the North American ice sheet into the atmosphere. Could it have been the "Trigger Event" for what you described?
Now you're talking. This was most likely the trigger event of the flood. Multiple impacts from a comet hitting the mile thick ice sheet in the polar area. The impacts created the Carolina and Nebraska bays with thousands of huge ice blocks. The impact created Saginaw Bay. Temps dropped precipitously and huge animals froze in the arctic in a matter of hours with digestible food still in their stomachs. Many of the large mamals in NA went extinct at the same time. The world sea levels rose, water flooded into the Mediterranean and across the Bosporus into the Black Sea. There are NO worldwide simultaneous sediments that would explain a world wide flood but the huge rise in sea levels, levelling of coastlines, and devastating climate change can explain the Biblical floods.
You assume that there was ice preflood and not that the ice sheets were caused by the flood processes.
How will temperature be affected by 40 days and nights of rain ?? Ark came to rest on a mountain,why not in a valley?
@@dorothygrube5314
The flood was the result of global tectonic activities, heating the oceans, spewing fine particles and increasing humidity which fell as torrential rain on land.
As the warmer air came into contact with the cooler land masses, snow storms resulted.
The Earth may have also titled to its current axis.
These creation scientists have models on these things.
Finally one of these videos that brings up the Oceanic ridge and Pacific ring of fire. The "fountains of the great deep" are so obvious. I would really like to learn more about the break up of the Pangea. I believe that, subduction and mantle flow is the real key to understanding all of this. I dont think the tectonic plates drifted or sprinted. I think the mantle flow caused constant rocking and crashing because of the virtual creation of the "New" Atlantic Ocean. Pellegrini was right!
Somewhere I saw something about how the continents fit together better _on a smaller Earth._ If so, the evil elitists who hate God, might try to suppress that idea, because it reeks of "divine intervention", as how else could it be explained away? We can not explain via conventional atheism-based models, how a planet could just change in size dramatically by naturalistic processes.
If that much material had suddenly come from outer space at the time of The Great Flood, the Ark would not have survived the heat of the event.
Dr Snelling's narration would be even more awesome as the backdrop for an action movie-type video. I listen and can see what he is describing. Thanks for this video - good stuff.
What is a Noah? Which day is His? and Why does it Matter?
Oh, and There has NEVER, in the history of the planet, been a World Wide "FLOOD" !
Oh ?? Then why is it in most cultures in various parts of the world ?
@@incognito-yj4gu Because humans like to seetle in areas prone to local floods, so they would end up making stories about massive floods. Why do all flood stories share only the concept of a flood, but are completely different about everything else?
rskeyesful, I don't believe you are old enough to declare the "history of the planet"
@@robertthompson3447 The evidence clearly shows there's never been a global flood. It would be pretty obvious if that had happened.
@@marcocappelli5124 you mean like the grand canyon is obvious?
This would be tremendously funny if it weren't so sad. :(
It's worse than that... it would be sad if it weren't so funny... :)
The "fountains of the deep" I think referred to water fountains as well as volcanos. Scientist have found layers of rock deep in the mantle which are saturated with water. They think a LOT OF WATER. Like oceans worth of water. A major tectonic cataclysm could basically "shake the soda can", then "pop the top" when the rock layer cracked open to the surface. Releasing enough water to flood the Earth.
So the flood myth comes from when the Mediterranean Sea first closed off. believed to be an earthquake that closed it off . Then 5k years later or so when more ice melted and sea levels went up . As that was happening the Mediterranean was evaporating and lowering . Then once the sea levels got high enough it filled the Mediterranean Sea back up . Now since the Mediterranean was evaporating for thousands of years people moved closer and closer to the shore line . That’s why so many villages and cities are now underwater around the globe . PBS Eons has a great video on it
Dr. Snelling is very passionate; but why not, he is discovering data that others have overlooked and or ignored because it doesn't fit into their worldview (that there is no need of a God).
And what he doesn’t mention is the accelerated decay rates and the extraordinary increase in the ocean temperatures that were required to support his findings. The planet would have been uninhabitable. Which is why his findings have been thoroughly debunked. The sad thing is that he is still touting these false claims and providing false hope to those who want to see the Bible fulfilled by actual science. He is a charlatan.
Thank you for getting right to it!! I was immediately drawn in!! Great info!
@@WildPhotoShooter ha! You will soon find out what is truth and fake. I get it though it’s hard to see. I will pray for you!
@@flyinbryan7151 Is it the glass half full thing? Some people think," man slithered from the sea & started building cars in Detroit", is a perfectly logical explanation.
@@WildPhotoShooter any evidence of a animal evolving a completely new anatomy ?
@@WildPhotoShooter well it would be if it was evolution 😂😂👎🏾
@@WildPhotoShooter convincing yourself doesn’t work. Sorry son but no , it’s not evolution! Lol man oh man, I feel sorry for idiots like you.
Great explanation
Foolishness to unbelievers. Perfect sense to a Christian with their eyes open.
Same here,,👍
More like, “wishful thinking” to Christians who demand a literal reading of the Bible.
eyes open , blinders on
I would like to hear your input on asteroids… there is proof that they did indeed hit earth in the past… where does this all fit in?
Could be what cracked the earths crust and got the process started. I think the book "Lucifers Hammer" by Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle actually understates the effects of a collision with a comet.
Ancient societies also record Venus as being a comet. They talk about the planets (particularly Jupiter and Saturn) getting out of alignment and reestablishing orbits.Neptune is also said to be "tipped over on it's side". Was the asteroid belt that's between Mars and Jupiter a planet? Is it now an asteroid belt because "Venus" hit it while coming into the inner layers of the planetary orbits.
Now the idea that Venus actually may have been a comet holds some interesting possibilities looking at the nature of that particular body. Venus is the only planet that rotates in the opposite direction of every other planet. Venus is the only planet with the dense (believed to be) sulfuric atmosphere. Venus's atmosphere is so dense that we actually have very little information on the topography of the planet's surface.
It's also believed that ice on comets and asteroids is one source of planetary water supplies. Which if Earth actually had "less water" before it was hit with asteroids that contained ice. Yeah, now it would have "more water". Scientists also believe there was water on Mars at one point. Both Mars and the moon are pocketed by being pelted with asteroid debris. And of course since Mars pretty much has no atmosphere to "hold water in" any water supplies that would have collected on that planet would have quickly evaporated from exposure to the electromagnetic energy waves that come off the sun.
Now another interesting element "in the mix" here is the role the Van Allen Belts play in the protection of the earth. Today most asteroid material is either deflected away from or burns up in Earth's atmosphere. An early 20th century Russian scientist had hypothesized that the property of space outside of Earth's atmosphere (including the Van Allen Belts) is actually hot not cold. Well the Soviets did likely prove his theory when they sent Sputnik-2 and that poor dog Laika into orbit. Australian data recorders had actually picked up the signals from Sputnik-2 and this is how we know what actually happened to that poor dog. Laika was the only life form on earth that ever got that close to the Van Allen Belts and Sputnik-2 burned up. Laike's blood vaporized and she died a horrendous death. Now of course this raises all kinds of questions about the moon landing; particularly seeing how NASA is now saying that in order to get humans to Mars; we have to figure out how to get through the Van Allen Belts. (Wait a minute guys... you allegedly did that in 1969???) Yet NASA is now saying that they "lost" all the Apollo flight data and "accidentally" taped over the original records. (Ehhh.... humanity's greatest scientific achievement??? .... Yeah!)
Any ways: We know activity from the sun (numbers and sizes of solar flares) will "add layers" to the Van Allen Belts. And obviously if catastrophic events within the solar system were at least partially responsible for Noah's flood. Even at so; God was certainly careful to ensure life on Earth survived the devastation. The flood is a sobering glimpse into the future destruction of this cosmos whence Judgement Day arrives.
I totally agree with this I've been looking into this a little lately and don't really have any insight to where it fits in but I think it is very important to ask questions. So many people think it's wrong to ask why and question something I believe finding the truth and all things is exactly what our heavenly father wants us to do he wants us to ask questions.
@@NNaadah You follow any of the Electric Universe Theory publications?
@@km9248 No it couldn't have been. The tectonic plates have always been moving. Do you have any idea how incredibly tiny even a large asteroid is comparee to the earth??
Genesis 6:5-8 ~ Then the LORD saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every intent of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. And the LORD was sorry that He had made man on the earth, and He was grieved in His heart. So the LORD said, "I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth, both man and beast, creeping thing and birds of the air, for I am sorry that I have made them." But Noah found grace in the eyes of the LORD.
It didn't happen. Just like most of the drama in the Bible.
It did happen, just like all of the drama in the Bible.
That's quite the presumption. Prove it didnt happen.
Picking and choosing his science.
If you are going to accept tectonic movement why disregard the dating of mountain chains your own scenario uses?
8:39 We already date that collision to around 480 million years ago. So Noah's flood was 480 million years before all evidence of Homo sapiens existence. Glad we got that settled.
There isn’t enough ice in BOTH polar caps to raise the water to the level depicted in the Bible. The notion of the great flood is ridiculous and impossible.
A flip of the earth can do it try seartch Suspiciousobservers
The video never implied it had anything to do with polar ice. Did you watch the video? The guy explains quite a different reason.
The guy in the video is a strange chap. Snelling is a bit of a laughing stock to be perfectly frank. When he's not publishing geology papers regarding 1.8 million year old rock he spends his down time telling people that the earth is only 6,000 years old.
Lol there wasn't ice at that time lol
The ice at the polar ice caps is over 3 million years old.
Please share the Love of the Son of God, He spoke Truth Forever
Please write His Words in your Heart, and share them. Please Forgive, and Pray for everyone. Immanuel, God with us... Peace
Wonderful words thank you for sharing Amen
To assess 40 days of rain flooding the world would not be scientifically possible. If the bottoms of the entire ocean floor erupted, as the Scripture states, massive flooding of the world would be possible. Equal weight is given to that fact, rather than just rain.
when i visited the Grand Canyon having the Biblical perspective of the floods runoff from the catstrophy made the sight all the more overwhelming!
Amazing how God brought together all the various dinosaurs on the ark, just to have them all go extinct! Amazing too, that fossil fuels like oil and coal so rapidly formed and buried so deep under layers of many different kinds of rocks. Hey, can't wait till you explain how all the different races of the earth descended from Noah and his three sons..
Geneticists must love explaining how only one breeding pair of a species can make a healthy repopulation. You see, there's this thing called inbreeding. In today's world, you need about 40 healthy pairs of a species to reproduce and repopulate effectively. I love how you people can throw an entire science like genetics under the bus just to fit your dogmatic narrative!
@@johnmcnulty4425 Eve was created to carry the eggs of all races. Noah's sons were each married to wives of a different race. Gotta think outside the box. The possibilities are endless!
Yep, think outside the box. Think god magic.
The great flood has been described in many cultures. Dating thousands of years back all have similar stories.
@@sandersson2813, I think you're confused about the origins of the Flood legends and the Bigfoot/Yeti legends. Studying the Flood Legends shows us a collective memory, with striking similarities to one another. The Bigfoot/Yeti legends have been found to have stemmed independently within the cultures in which they are found (and they are NOT "all over the world", as you have claimed). The Bigfoot legend has been around only a mere 60 years. The Flood Legends predate pretty much all the history that the average human knows about.
Easy on the category mistakes next time.
Was there a less than great great flood…I think that is the one I believe in…more local than global…also seems pretty difficult to have so many cultures explain it if they were underwater in cement slippers
@@sandersson2813 SA…that’s not nice, please do not insult my family
@@Williamb612 simple, as the few that survived propagated and spread over the earth over the following centuries, they passed along handed down accounts of the global destruction event along with the drastically changed landscape to prove it. During the global event, most had cement slippers and didn't make it.
@@sandersson2813 you ASSume uniformity. Why wouldn't the mountain ranges be lifted during and towards the end of massive continental shift and plates moving at meters per second from huge meteors slamming the earth causing supervolcano's, mile high tsunami's and mega-earth quakes, etc.
Plainly, observably TRUE.
What about the meteor craters. The one in the yucatan peninsula caused an extinction level event. When did that happen? Before the flood?
There's no evidence of a global flood but there's evidence of a meteor impact in the Yucatan peninsula.
Great information. Was there just a single great flood? Also, did the flood subside when the continental drift slowed?
The amount of water in the oceans, is easily enough water to flood the entire earth, if only the earth was flatter, or more of a perfect sphere. Genesis says that the waters assuaged. I understand that the oceans became deeper and the mountains rose, giving the water a place to go to. So then the waters of The Great Flood are still here, they just are not covering the land anymore.
Yes, the entire world was flooded. That is why Noah had to spend a century building the Ark. There was no high land to flee to. But rather than God destroying the earth, God saved humanity, as without God's intervention, humanity was already doomed to self-destruction.
Well before God created Adam and Eve the world was covered in water. The flood of Noah's time was the only time God flooded the whole earth after man was created.
Very informative fantastic job explaining the magnitude of the flood
I always thought the Columbia River gorge of basalt was fascinating. Lived nearby. And in some areas there is petrified forests & those tree trunks were huge in diameter. Yes, I think that basalt came from a fissure, not a mtn or cone type eruption.
¹⁹ And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven, were covered.
²⁰ *Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail;* and the mountains were covered.
*-Genesis 7:19-20*
Royal Cubit = *20.6"*
20.6" × 15 = 309" ÷ 12" = *25.75'*
So, what caused the WW flood?
What historical event? A meteorite impact, maybe.
The video does not answer this question.
But the arguments given for a catastrofical view are convincing.
God made the flood happen
@@kirkkuykendoll9507 God has superpowers, he can do that. Kill the whole world minus one family. Only because he wants to.
Even using this discussion, the Biblical flood cannot have happened within the time frame of 6300 years (or whatever the current Creationist guesstimate is). The erosion forces we have seen take longer than 6300 years. The age during which Pangaea split into the continents is much more than 6300 yeas ago. The tumultuous (catastrophic) tectonics theories aren't instantaneous. And the Ark (as described in the Bible) would not survive. Its flexibility at the given length would be enough for it to snap into pieces.
The animals would have asphyxiated before starving.
And extreme evolution would have had to occur after for there to be as many species as there are today.
Professing to be wise they became fools-you should really take time to understand this.
So a lot of factual information ignored because of religion
The new definition of science is "the belief in anything as long as its not in the Bible".
@@theodoremartin6153 sorry to burst your bubble science has always been about proving the truth, the bible is about magic
@@ronaldharris6569 - Nope. Theodore is correct. The only ones trying to insert MAGIC into the conversation are the bumbling atheists.
@@freemind.. you must have been commenting on another thread.athiesm is the answer to one question do you believe in God? If you answer no then you are an atheist. Whatever the individual believes in after that is up to the individual
@@ronaldharris6569 - _"athiesm is the answer to one question do you believe in God?"_
*I wasn't answering a question. I was making a factual statement.*
The earth's poles reversed and it's rotation switched direction causing a washing-machine-like backwash (tsunami) of immense proportions - This major shift is cyclical and due to happen again.
²⁶ Moreover the light of the moon shall be as the light of the sun, and the light of the sun shall be sevenfold, as the light of seven days, in the day that the LORD bindeth up the breach of his people, and healeth the stroke of their wound.
*-Isaiah 30:26*
He’s wrong on this one... preconceived ideology of continental drift is false... If the continents are continually moving, then why do thousands of ancient structures still line up with its celestial object to this very day? It would be off in just a few years.
A very good point. Ty
Because he's not making the point that the continents **continued** to move at that rate, but that they did as part of that catastrophic event. That event - which coupled incredible earthquakes with unprecedented vulcanism - ruptured the earth's surface all over, leading to a vastly swifter motion during the course of that event than at any other time, more so than was the case prior to them and certainly more so now when we are geologically "calm" by comparison.
Did you not hear the part towards the end of the video when he spoke about the continents moving at meters per second or walking speed? Then discussed the continents moving at a speed similar to the growth of a fingernail?
The ocean floor was most likely dry land, and all of the water was under the land, once the water that was under the land is now on top, then the land would sink, creating ocean floors. Even this man that believes in creation, isn't thinking that the world hasn't always been how it is today, IE oceans always being there.
Dbeaumount Resident
And what makes you think the ocean floor was dry land? How did you get to this conclusion?
@@marcocappelli5124 As a theory, it would explain how the waters would be under insane amounts of intense pressure, enough to crack the floating mantle, and erode away the ever increasing cracks. Once the weight of the water was on top of the land (the water having been evacuated) created a void which the land then fell, our "ocean floors" today. I tend to believe that the waters were stored under the land. That's a theory I've heard, that I tend to believe makes best sense. Thanks for asking Marco.
All this just shows the POWER OF OUR GOD and his GLORY. Everything belongs to GOD for his word existed before the creation of the WORLD. People spend their time trying to find the Garden of Eden for it was destroyed in and during the Flood . But GOD did say that the WHOLE WORLD will be the Garden of Eden again for a new heaven and a new earth will be when he returns and justice is served up. Blessed be our LORD GOD.
The specificity this guys goes into is pretty incredible.
@@sandersson2813 He based his conclusions on the same circumstantial evidence as geologists who don't subscribe to the cataclysmic flood narrative. The difference is that this man gave explanations for certain things like the Grand Canyon that seem to have more cohesion. So if you think his conclusions are invalid, why aren't the mainstream conclusions invalid? You're also assuming a lot considering the amount of information he's explaining in a 20 minute video. I'm going to dig for some of his lectures to get more depth on his theory. But to be dismissive of his conclusions with a simple statement such as yours is unscientific and pure conjecture. Science asks questions regardless of what beliefs may be held mainstream. Even if we were to assume that eventually he turned out to be wrong, being able to explain why something is not true gives a deeper understanding of a subject. That is science. If you have any videos that explain the contrary points well, feel free to link them and I'd love to watch. Otherwise, this comments section appears to be riddled with people making very general statements that this man is incorrect, and none of them actually address the substance of his propositions.
@@sandersson2813 Everyone presenting a narrative about the geologic history of plate tectonics is theorizing because nobody was there. Hard "proof" isn't a thing when it comes to these sorts of things. It's based on >>the same circumstantial evidence
Yes specific enough that he must know he is wrong.
@@TheCho22
What makes you unscientific is that you are unwilling to give up your beliefs.
Darwin was a trained theologian that was going to a clergyman after his ocean voyage.
He kept an open .mind.
And ultimately made no real difference in Science. He was accused of plagiarism because some else had written the same basic ideas.
If Darwin had became a clergyman and never wrote his theory then it would have been Wallace or someone else.
The Theory of Evolution is what the evidence supports.
@@sandersson2813 - _"The grand canyon isn't proof of a global flood."_
*Yes it is. You argue from ignorance.* There is nothing in modern geology that can explain the Grand Canyon other than the *combined forces of an EARTHQUAKE and receding floodwaters ---- both on a scale never before witnessed.*
*The lack of erosion on the canyon walls* shows that it didn't happen over millions of years and was not caused by simply wind and water. Additionally, the *Cardenas Lavas confirm the combination of the quake and the flood...*
*Do you believe that little river eroded out all of that earth and removed it from that giant canyon?* If so, you will need to explain the biggest shortfall of all erosion theories.. *THE MISSING ENORMOUS DELTA* at the end of the Colorado River; *it does not exist.* Where did the washed away sand and eroded material go? There is *no explanation* for the disappearance of the sediment, which would have been *one of the largest sediment transport events on the planet.*
Let me clarify... *there IS a delta, but NOT the delta that SHOULD be there.* The existing delta is NOT reflective of one of the largest material transport events in Earth history. It *should be one of the largest found,* and it *should consist of the red sandstone particles* that were supposedly carried to it for eons. But *eroded red sandstone does not exist along the river or in the Sea of Cortez,* except in incidental quantities related to current river flow activity.
What caused the flood-one word-GOD!
Wickedness
@@Omegaej1 Plagiarising a fictional story from 1000 years previous.
Well making that flood must have knackered him out because he's done bugger all since
Astroids. Space.
@@Davidanderson-zu9wn So, what does that have to do with anything?
Spectacular work you guys, Advancing God's word and truth
truth, lmao!
Genesis 2:10-14 indicates that the geography of Mesopotamia was not entirely different before the flood as after. Moses names four rivers, two or three of which are still identifiable today, and presumably all of which were identifiable in Moses’ day. He also describes surface-level gold and mineral deposits that were present both in his own day and at creation. How do we evaluate that passage, if the flood was truly so catastrophic as to destroy the whole geography of the world? What is the purpose of the passage in the first place, if not to locate the pre-flood Eden according to Moses’ post-flood geography? Honest questions, thank you!
It's crucial for one to recognize that Africa and South America do not fit together when observing both of their continental shelves that extend much further out in the Atlantic Ocean as seen in "Floor Of The Oceans" maps. There is no way they (continents) both ever fit together when taking that in to account, and that must be seriously considered by any "true" geologist.
I would like to hear the explanation or evidence for how various animals disbursed across the continent after the flood
The sea level was lower
@@karjala. Not as low as that of your comprehension.
Ice Bridges between certain continents because after the flood was the Ice age and the others probably by human boats like Noah did at first
According to apologists there have been volcanic trampolines that made the platyplusses jump to Australia-
@@magickennyj there was not an ice bridge from Mt. Ararat to Australia , that's nearly 8 thousand miles. That would be an ice bride twice as wide as the Atlantic Ocean.
Dr. Snelling is always funny to me. Every time you try to assess the energies released by some of the stuff he says the earth dies. Atmospheres hotter than the ignition temperature of human flesh, global molten hellfire, or in my favorite cases when the earth just gets vaporized.
Nothing. There was never a worldwide flood. It's a myth that has roots in Mesopotamian and Sumerian mythology which substantially predates the Hebrew version of that myth. A worldwide flood would have been news to the Egyptians who were established as a civilization at that time and yet have no record of any kind of worldwide flood as their civilization was not affected by a worldwide flood at any point in their history.
Sorry, the Egyptians were not an established civilization until after the flood. Hundreds of cultures have accounts of a global flood, including ancient Egypt.
@@dooglitas
The flood would have happened during the early Egyptian civilization and they have no record of any such event. There's evidence for many ancient local flood events, but not for a worldwide event. There's also no evidence for a Jewish slave revolt and exodus from Egypt and no evidence of any group of people wandering the Sinai Desert for forty years. Also, there's no evidence that Abraham, Issac and Ishmael ever existed either. The Hebrews adopted it all from the mythology of earlier civilizations and changed the details and the names. The very underpinnings of the three major so called "Abrahamic religions" is clearly based in the mythology of previous cultures and does not appear to align with reality.
@@Reno_Slim I don't know where you get your information, but it is nonsense. First of all, if the flood happened during "early Egyptian civilization," that civilization would have been wiped off the face of the earth. There would be no Egyptians to record anything. However, there is a flood story in Egyptian mythology. Your claims about the exodus is not true. If you would apply the same degree of skepticism to your atheistic nonsense, you would change your tune.
There's not a drop of scientific sense in all he is saying. The problem arises from the fundamentalists sects point of view of taking what is written in the Bible in a literal sense.
That is an easy one GOD CAUSED THE FLOOD
I have always thought about this event being linked to the breaking up of the Continent's.
I also do not believe the Grand Canyon was carved by the Colorado River, To many mass ejection points, A river would have filled them with sediment.
(Edit)Adding another thought:Hypothesis. The Sloshing water helps explain how the Polar Ice Caps formed
It also explains earths wobble.
@Joseph Blough Said who? Were you there?
@Joseph Blough - He means that you spout supposition as though it is proven fact. Since you are so sure that you are correct, tell us WHY Pangaea broke apart? What was the actual cause and mechanism? Be sure your answer also explains the incredible difference in composition and thickness between the oceanic crust and the continental crust.. because, if the crust simply cooled from a ball of convecting magma, it should be relatively consistent in makeup and thickness across the globe -- but it is most definitely NOT.
@Joseph Blough And Same to you, The evidence is in plain sight.
This is like 6 th grade science class stuff man. Sky fairies had nothing to do with it. I promise.
@Joseph Blough Ok so the fact we are in the perfect zone for life not to cold not to hot our sun/Star has a unique radiation signal/frequency compared to all the others out there our moon is larger than other moons in planet moon size comparison The fossil record evidence is overwhelming the grand canyon has evidence of a massive flow due to acres of pits that could only be done by a massive flow of water and archeologists keep digging things up related to the dead sea scrolls in the middle east.
Its ABC, easy as 123.
Bye now
I wish I kept the newest research about the interior world. It's nothing like old schools teach. There is an inter ocean inside the earth. Go and read the sumarian history about the flood also, it explains how water came from with in.
Most people would say water, but I would say man's lawlessness, wickedness and godlessness is the main reason
The interesting thing is that the sediment layers were deposited first and then the continents broke apart… one hundred years after the global flood, according to the Bible.
@@sandersson2813 You lack evidence since the evidence is of a global flood. All the evidence is from the global flood. Populations genetics historical records calendars geology genealogies all are the result of the global flood. Look into it.
@@JungleJargon Ice cores document hundreds of years into the past, and at no point is there any evidence for a global flood. All of the things you mentioned are also evidence against the flood myth.
@@marcocappelli5124 Ice cores occurred after the deposition of sediment layers, on top of the sediment layers. Ice cores are the most unreliable method for determining when an event occurred.
@@marcocappelli5124 You don’t know what the evidence is.
@@JungleJargon Check the article "The GISP2 Ice Core: Ultimate Proof that Noah’s Flood Was Not Global".
The different independent methods for counting the annual layers all point to the same ages, all match each other. They point with great accuracy to volcanic eruptions of known ages. How could that be?
When Noah brought two of every animal (even the one's from Australia and Galapagos that would have taken months to travel too)
How many extra zebras did he take, lions get awfully hungry after a few days. I still can't believe no one else had a boat back then.
The animals came to Noah; he didn't go out and round them up. Before the Flood, and for a few hundred years afterward, the continents were still undivided. Pangaea didn't divide hundreds of millions of years ago. The animals could walk, slither or fly all the way to Noah, and all the way home afterward. Ask yourself why the claim of 175 million years ago for the breakup of Pangaea? What is it based on? Then ask this..: *If the Earth's surface simply formed from cooling magma, why is the oceanic crust so different from the continental crust in both composition and thickness..?* Do those who claim 175 million years for Pangaea have a good answer? Do they offer a reasonable cause and mechanism for the breakup in the first place??
I know right.. The Koala only walks about 4mph and is only awake for about 4 hours a day.. It eats very specific food too. Believing this stuff now is just for crack pots.
we have been brainwashed far too long that something can come out of nothing...and any other alternative explanation is pseudo science...so guess who has a narrow mind
It seems your question is more of a final statement of unbelief. From a secular point of view this would make sense. It’s has been taught in our public schools for a long time, but on the other hand if you believe in a God who so far beyond us, who could call the universe into existence in a moment without even trying, who knows the thoughts and intentions of the heart of every human being who has ever lived, is living now, or those yet unborn all at the same time, makes me think that the idea of how the animals got to Noah seem absurd.
@@sandersson2813 Of course it’s against the law. The truth has been under fire for a long time.
The Antarctic ice shelf broke away into the ocean causing a massive wave that swept around the planet and causing massive storms...
And the ice age is still melting technically we still are in an ice age
Absolutely, until the Antarctica is tropical again we're still coming out of the mini ice age.
It amazes me that people take this literally. If there was a flood it was a local event not worldwide.
that is a very uneducated statement. A few years ago, geologists mapped the Chixalub meteor that hit the Yucatan. It was the size of Manhatten.
They computer modeled the impact and the results were global extinction of that side of the globe.
Ejecta, heat blast, super volcanoes, and about a 5000 ft tall tsunami (almost a mile high)
it is almost unanimous that this was the dinosaur killer.
The water was miles-deep. That can't be isolated to any local area. So, you'll say, there was never that much water on the Earth.. Do you know the actual process for creating quartz? It is an aqueous process with massive heat and pressure requirements. Now realize that the fossilization process that turns organic material into crystallized, quartz-based stone, is the same process. This is why there are NO organic fossils being lithified anywhere on the planet today. Every last one of them that exists was created during the biblical Flood. The pressure requirement is equal to being under 5 miles of water. There was no other time when the conditions would allow for it to happen.
Please let this nonsense go. The Bible is so much more rich morally/wisdom than to make peti arguments on fiction being fact.
Like god supporting suicide attacks? Or murdering children? or Cannibalism? You can take that moral superiority delusion and shove it up your jumper.
I'll have to make this brief, for now. Do you consider that the Genisis "Gap Theory/Proposition" has validity and, if so, do you take it into account in your investigations of ancient cataclysmic Earth changes? Thank you.
Nibiru is the cause
I have been enjoying learning more on this theory of how the Earth was flooded and how the waters receded. What I would love to know more about is how the hot waters coming from the deep cooled down enough before hitting the ark. The waters coming from the deep had to be pretty hot, right? Wouldn't those waters bake everything in the ark?
Melissa, this is the best example of the Flood, that I've come across.
Keep questioning.
The word of the Lord is true. Many have popularized the great flood as being produced by rain which fell for "forty days and forty nights," but they simply missed the part that talked about the waters coming upward. It's important to remember this did not happen by itself. God did so in his judgement of a rebellious and unbelieving world.
There is not "word of the lord".
Everything you've aver read, that is attributed as "the word of the lord", was written by people.
@@jusfugly And the people's comment on the matter is in Matthew 8:27 "Even the winds and the sea obey him!" KJV AV 1611
@@jusfugly Are we to believe the God who spoke the entire universe into existence cannot inspire a human to put his word down as he wills it? The God I worship is not so limited. Also conisder that Jesus was a human too, but surely that's no basis for ignoring the entire story of the gospel. He was born and lived as human, and yet the only perfect life without sin...and his resurrection proved that he was also much more than human.
@@nuancolar7304 No, we are not to believe that your imaginary friend spoke the universe into existence, as there is absolutely no evidence that such thing could ever happen.
There's no explanation as to how that could even happen.
Your fantasy stories lack a great deal of detail on methods.
"The god you worship", only exists in your imagination and nowhere else.
There is no evidence that your imaginary god exists.
You cannot consider that jesus was a human, or anything else.
There is zero evidence that jesus ever existed.
There is no evidence that any of the stories from the gospels ever happened.
Stating that he was born and lived as a human, is a massive assumption that is not backed by any evidence.
Sin is simply a construct made up by your religion and has no meaning in the real world.
There is no evidence of a resurrection as there is no evidence that he ever existed.
So, this god of yours, is supposedly "all powerful".
How was it, that he only managed to make himself known to one small group of desert dwellers.
He didn't manage to to make himself known anywhere else in the world.
All other countries and ethnic group had their own beliefs.
Some belief systems didn't even have gods.
Why didn't your god, make himself known in Japan or China, where the population was at least generally literate.
Your so called, all powerful god was landlocked and had to rely on word of mouth and military conquest to spread "his word".
It took more than 1400 years for "his word" to reach the Americas.
It took more than 1700 years for "his word" to reach the Australian Aborigines.
Why?
Didn't he like them.
According to people like you, he supposedly created them.
Did he forget where he put them?
@@jusfugly
God is real. He created the earth, and he gave you your life and he gave me mine. His wish is not for me, or you, to perish. Give his word a chance. Because every knee will bow to him one day, and every tongue shall call him LORD.
I will do that....and you will do that, too.
i've greatly enjoyed many hours of Dr Snelling and Dr Wise's fantastic, "Is Gen. His.", presentations about what happened during and after the cataclysm but never what actually started it. i'm left to imagine it's God's Hand of Judgement literally cracking earth open like breaking the shell of an egg. or did God literally force the ejection out from the center of the earth which aligns more with "[first] the great springs from beneath burst forth"
If a tectonic plate has a subduction zone where it is losing material on one side and adding material on the other side, what makes anyone think the shapes have changed and or moved?
They move at different rates, as a whole, relative to one another; and also on their own opposite sides.
@@tohellorbarbados7119 100% illogical.
Good question. It (tectonic plates) seems to indicate the assumption of separate floating continents. All lands are connected under the ocean hence the seabed.
@@tohellorbarbados7119 Move where? and how? All the lands are connected via the seabed. They are not floating independently.
@@EZHostglo The subduction rate at one plate boundary is not equal to the construction rate at a different plate boundary. Hence a build up of pressure or a stretching within the elasticity of the plate between.
DO YOU HAVE A DVD I CAN BUY?
Talk about total gullibility.
@@jusfugly to believe what mainstream pseudo science tells you without doing your own critical thinking and investigation is total gullibility.
@@ITPalGame Okay then, present your "scientific" evidence that your imaginary god exists.
Obviously, a critical thinker, like yourself, would not believe in anything for which he had no evidence.
That would be gullibility.
This should be good.
@@jusfugly
Clearly you haven't done anything since you wrote, otherwise you would have presented the things you have learned from the contributing scientists instead of bringing the usual avoidance and table turning.
@@ITPalGame There have been no scientific findings that confirm any of your myths.
I don't bring avoidance and table turning, that is usually practiced by deluded believers.
I simply bring facts.
Talking about avoidance, what is this evidence for your imaginary god?
The giants were 30 feet tall. God was furious with the fallen angels & mans evil behavior. They were all breeding with everything. Fallen angels with daughters of men. And the animals. And just like the Tower of Babel God broke up the continents I think to separate mankind when the earth replenished.
The book of enoch most people only believe in what they have been indoctrinated into believing, works out good for the Devil on not knowing what to expect whats coming... as it was in the days of Noah so shall it be in the coming of the son of man.
Well the separation didn't work very well did it. Humans got everywhere and now we're all mixing and travelling again. Not very godly.
I'm not worried about your beliefs, my uncle Ron Wyatt found most of the big event of the bible and has physical evidence to back it up, this was found back in tbe 80s, you should be asking why the power that be keep teching you lies!!!! Wow unto the and habitats of the earth for the Devil is come down to you with great wrath and power. Your teacher good luck with that!!!! What came first the chicken or the egg?
@@sandersson2813 he found Noahs ark, Turkey has officially announced and declared it as the official site of Noah's Ark where real scientist have been studying it.... he also found the red sea crossing where god parted the red sea. so if God can part the red sea he most certainly can flood his creation. Perhaps you should go to his Museum and sea the evidence for yourself... celebrated we will see whos celebrating when they meet God face to face.
Can I use this has a script for a movie.
This would fit in with the theory of a meteor strike on Earth about 12,600 years ago as proposed by Randall Carlson.
The impact is believed to have caused the Earth's crust to rotate around its molten core; one of the effects of this would be both Antarctica and Siberia rotated from the tropics to their frozen locations now.
The impact would have vaporised huge quantities of water which by convection moved north and south where they came down as snow to cause the ice sheets of the Younger Dryas period.
In addition, the crustal rotation would have caused the crust to crack open and release the hot lava under the oceans, causing the water to boil and causing the massive tsunamis which would have spilled over the continents. One manifestation of this would have been the flood over the Channeled Scablands in Washington State.
This flow of water would also have scoured out the Grand Canyon.
Also this splitting and movements of the crust would have caused the formation of the new mountain ranges such as the Himalayas and the Andes.
All of this still has some holes in it, but overall it explains the earth's geological history a lot better than the nonsense we were taught in geology classes.
You seem to be conflating quite a few differing theories. Like invoking Randall's name but immediately straying away from his work.
Yes he is a proponent of YD impact theories. But when has he ever gone to crustal rotation? Or formation of the entire Grand Canyon in any one event?
There's plenty of solid science on the Scablands that makes great sense and doesn't need to go anywhere near boiling ocean tsunamis.
@@yodieyuh It is called using your brain.
Data has been accumulated by numerous different scientists in different specialities; Randall Carlson is just one of those.
Using your brain requires that you draw together different data and hypotheses from varying sources and firing off a few neurons to construct an overall coherent theory that seeks to explain phenomena.
I realise that this is a novel concept for those whose primary ability is the mindless regurgitation of what they memorised in school.
But give it a try, you may learn something.
@@MelbaOzzie Feel free to link data on the Grand Canyon being formed 12.5kya. Or on boiling seas. Or on Andes and Himalayas not being dated properly. Etc.
Bravo. This was a process, many times, many layers. Jeremiah 4: 23 - 27.; Isaiah 14: 12 - 17.
I've always been curious if The fountains of the deep refer to the amount of water trapped in the Earth's crust? Scientists say it's more than the amount of water on the Earth's surface.
It sounds like they believe it's a combination of just such waters perhaps - probably? - with magmatic activity.
Is it possible the taklamakan desert in China had something to do with the flood? somehow the pattern in the landscape looks like something big happend there, as if water from within came out there
Imagine the world being covered with more land and less water. Also the land is flatter than today. The upper crust is really very thin. Like the covering on a globe. The mantel cracks open and the waters of the deep gush out with lots of force, so strong it shoots up into the upper atmosphere. The force of this erodes everything around it and land masses are pushed and destroyed like a wet piece of paper on that globe. The whole world is then covered in water with violent eddies, waves and torrential rain. It destroys and moves everything. Afterwards, where it eroded the most the water drains to those places. (the oceans, seas, lakes and rivers) It took about a year. Yes there is still wwater in the depths of our planet and I imagine very important to our water cycles. The earh is very thick in comparison to our crust. Dr. Walt Brown has a video on this theory. Also Kent Hovind shows it in one of his videos. The short video shows and explains it quite well.
you can easily look up the amount of water in the Earth's crust and do some basic maths. You will find that if you brought it all up top, it would be the tiniest fraction of the amount need for that worldwide flood. It seems like a little research would be the first honest reaction.
There is 10.5 million cubic miles of water in the crust. The oceans are 70% of Earth's surface. About 140 million sq miles. If all water came up top and ran into the oceans, the sea levels would raise only 400 ft
There are 321 million cubic miles of water in Earth's oceans. So the water underground is only 3% as much as in the oceans. And there is other water also on the surface. You might pull the wool over the eyes of gullible people, but you wont pull the wool over my eyes.
I would certainly love to meet those "scientists". Note, "creation scientists" are not scientists, they are snake oil salesmen, who serve no good purpose
The Bible says waters above & waters below. We live on a flat earth on four pillars my bible says.
You know some of the bible is metaphor right? And your supposed to use your discernment to figure out which is which.
If I understand the bible correctly its not what but rather who
Yes, a description of God's creation and interaction with mankind culminating in Christ's sacrifice for our salvation. Science is the investigation of God's creation, which God doesn't speak about in the Bible. Basing all these theories on the flood is just not sufficient to explain the creation.
One day the Lord will take me back in the spirit to the day the Flood came. I want to see this as it happened. It's fascinating to imagine the absolute titanic forces that wrenched and ruptured the crust of the earth so incredibly violently in this cataclysm.
In studying the depth of the layers of sediment in one video, I learned that although great earthquakes were observed to create layers of sediment inches to a foot thick, the layers of sediment that were several yards thick would have required earthquakes of unimaginable power and size many magnitudes greater than anyone has ever seen, except those who died in them during the Flood.
there was no worldwide flood…and no multiple cubit ship housed all species in twos
There was a worldwide flood, though. And I think you're confused about how many animals were actually just in the Ark. There was every kind of creature, not all species of creatures. So there was a horse kind, a dog kind, a cat kind, etc., from which all the variations of horses (i.e. zebras, donkeys, etc), dogs (i.e. wolves, foxes, coyotes, the dingo, etc.), and cats (i.e. lions, tigers, jaguars, etc.) descended.
@@juilianbautista4067 what about sloths and a platypus
@george vcelar GV…when we reply to these it takes us down a whirlpool of superstition, folklore, and mythology…the message of these fantastical stories is brilliant and very relevant anytime, however literally did not happen
it cracks me up how folks will hold on tooth and nail to preserving the idea that the bible is completely literal…it isn’t. Some parts are allegories, some myths, some metaphors, and others actual. Ultimately it is an amazing feat of literature, part documentary, part biography, and part fiction…but was created for a beautiful and noble purpose: to organize, civilize, and elevate society from the mud.
@george vcelarWhat is wild GV is that these attempts to explain our reality are not very good…you and I in a basement with a bong could do better
How I wish you guys would open dialog with Walt Brown.
Better answers could be found, don't bother telling me why you're superior,
I've heard it before. God bless you all.
Stop calling it world wide. The aboriginals in Australia have zero record of their land being completely underwater. And they have been there for 50,000 years.
How do you know they've been there 50,000 years? I don't think any people have survived 50k years bro..
Could anyone please guide me what was the geological time for global flood?