What was unexpectedly found in Dinosaur Bones, Coal and Diamonds? - Dr. Andrew Snelling
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 พ.ค. 2020
- Andrew Snelling continues discussing radioisotope dating, including whether excess heat would be a problem for accelerated decay rates. He then examines radiocarbon dating and determines whether carbon-14 has been found in dinosaur bones, coal and diamonds.
𝘐𝘴 𝘎𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘴 𝘏𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘺? is a documentary that features over a dozen scientists and scholars explaining how the world intersects with the history recorded in Genesis. From rock layers to fossils, from lions to stars, from the Bible to artifacts, this fascinating film will change the way you see the world. The film’s goal is to provide a reasonable case for Creation in six normal days, a real Adam and Eve, an actual fall, a global flood, and a tower of Babel. Dr. Del Tackett, creator of 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘛𝘳𝘶𝘵𝘩 𝘗𝘳𝘰𝘫𝘦𝘤𝘵, serves as your guide-hiking through canyons, climbing up mountains, and diving below the sea-in an exploration of two competing views…one compelling truth.
Watch the full film now:
• Is Genesis History? - ...
This segment is taken from 𝘉𝘦𝘺𝘰𝘯𝘥 𝘐𝘴 𝘎𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘴 𝘏𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘺?, which explores rocks and fossils, intelligent design, astronomy, and so much more! These fascinating segments are approximately 20 minutes each and include an incredible depth of material not included in the film. They are perfect for families, churches, schools, and homeschools wanting to learn how Genesis explains the world around us.
Watch the full series here:
• Rocks & Fossils | Beyo...
Dr. Snelling completed a BS in applied geology at the University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia, graduating with first-class honors in 1975. His PhD in geology was awarded in 1982 by The University of Sydney for his research thesis titled “A Geochemical Study of the Koongarra Uranium Deposit, Northern Territory, Australia.” Dr. Snelling worked for six years in the exploration and mining industries in Tasmania, New South Wales, Victoria, Western Australia, and the Northern Territory, variously as a field, mine, and research geologist. For over ten years, Dr. Snelling was a research consultant to the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organization for an international collaborative research project funded by the U.S. Department of Energy which involved university and government research scientists from the USA, UK, Australia, Japan, Korea, Sweden, Austria and Belgium.
For more information on Dr. Snelling, please go to bit.ly/2zIzOFZ.
----------------------------------------------------
✨ Looking to learn more about Genesis and Creation?
🦕 Visit our blog for helpful articles: bit.ly/3d306R1
🍃 Free Videos: bit.ly/3e1HRgc
🌌 Questions & Answers: bit.ly/3d0EG6T
The problem is science has turned into “what does this evidence tell us about evolution?” instead of “what does this evidence tell us?”
Geology is so incredibly fascinating. I can’t believe how much of a nerd I have become the older I get. Keep up the good work gentlemen.
There is a big difference between "science" and "scientism". Real scientists should follow the evidence wherever it leads them.
I agree. The issue is most scientists get money to fund their research. Most those donors want proof of evolution. Plus if your findings go against evolution your not allowed to publish in any "science" journal
I'm not a creationist or even remotely close but I appreciate your well put together videos so i can get a better understanding of what your point of view is on the subject. Thanks.
These videos are so well done I can’t get over them. The information is in depth but presented in a simple, straightforward manner. This is such a fantastic resource for presenting the creationist stance. We need more resources of this level. God bless you all for this!
Aaron Tullock The host of the show always asks the questions I'm coming up with during the previous answer! So he predicts what his audience needs to know
Thats why our faith still exist today, we have the evidence and truth on our side, if we didn't our faith would have been dead and forgotten long long long ago.
You don't need a "creationist stance." You either believe or you don't.
Really and truly. More of these inspired men and women! As with most popular science, groping in blindness rules the day. What is true is sure. God's Word is certain to prevail. An "anvil that has worn out many Hammers."
At Yellowstone National Park - specimen ridge - geologists had a sign that the ridge was millions of years old with multiple forests being petrified over ages. Then Mount Saint Helens blew up - and one forest was buried in mud flows - through multiple layers. It only took a few hours to reproduce what university geologists said took millions of years. I don't put any value on their dates.
No one should believe those that are atheist they are shamelessly teaching false science, all they do is observe from a distance and make a guess thats it, Christians actually explore the evidence.
...AHHH...!!!... @Periodic... Saw the same vid just today...!!!... and 30 years to observe the phenomena...!!!...
Yeah I saw that video from this channel. Very good information.
@Nemesis
Not sure we should hold too much against Darwin. He himself said that if complexity of design could be proven that he himself would reject his own theory. If he was alive today with the discovery of DNA and so much more, Darwin would likely not be an evolutionist.
@@njsongwriter very true unless he himself was a liar not unheard of
Near time 10:25 Snelling says that "after 90,000 years there should be no radiocarbon left in dinosaur bones." Radiocarbon will still be present after 90,000 years. About one part in 53,000 of the original radiocarbon will remain. The calculation is 90,000 years divided by 5,700 years (the half-life of radiocarbon). This gives 15.7 half lives. Then, take 2 to the 15.7th power to get an answer of approximately 53,000 which is the fraction of initial radiocarbon that will remain -- one part in about 53,000.
I'm an atheist, and I like your videos. Everything must be questioned. The modern public's unquestioning acceptance of the dictates of 'scientific authority,' as revealed truth, has definitely become a faith-based religion. That doesn't mean your religion is true. But it does mean we shouldn't have faith in 'science,' if we're claiming not to be motivated by faith.
Science is so faulty, so corrupted these days, so enmeshed with politics and money, and yet still so ardently believed. The scientists occupy exactly the position of the medieval Catholic clergy: that of the possessors of unquestionable truth, to be received and accepted on their authority.
If you ask for evidence, you're considered a 'conspiracy theorist,' a term that is used to means roughly 'heathen' or 'blasphemer,' for doubting their revelations.
Unlike so many other atheists one can encounter on the web, you really are an actual free thinker and have our respect for it. Never stop searching for the truth my friend. God bless.
Good comment. Your approach makes me wonder if you are truly an atheist, or a sincere agnostic. Wouldn't you have to have conclusive proof that God doesn't (or can't) exist to be a atheist? Doesn't atheism require a faith step of its own? This is truly not meant to be a slam of you in any way - just questioning...
(For the record, I am a Christian, but not opposed to rigorous scientific method - just opposed to dogmatic science... and dogmatic religion that requires faith without reasoning.)
If you look at the coding of DNA then you must realize that a creator was busy coding. This stuff cant create or evolve byitself. Imagine windows coding itself by evolution.
Bible is full of stuff talking of things we only discovered past few hundred years.
brindlebriar better hope your right... good luck with that
@Darth Quantum The part you ignored in his post. The foundations or benefactors supporting any research has no skin in the game on the outcome. If you believe that, you are merely brainwashed.
Thanks for bringing this up! We need brave scientists.
15:39 And this take away returns me to the first time I'd heard the 1st. lines of the Simon & Garfunkel sung song ''The Boxer'' written & 1st. sung by Bob Dylan...
I'm just a poor boy
Though my story's seldom told
I have squandered my resistance
For a pocketful of mumbles
Such are promises, all lies and jest
Still a man hears what he wants to hear
And disregards the rest.
album: "Self Portrait" (1970)
''For Teachers, Professors, & Politicians (Regurgitate Only) those things of which they're paid to eat.''
Any decent "investigator" in any aspect of life, will tend to look at the preponderance of evidence. Anyone that looks to manipulate evidence to fit their particular theory about it, is not a scientist or an investigator of ANY INTEGRITY.
I am SO enjoying this series.
THAT WAS AN EXCELLENT DISCUSSION.
What about the firmament canopy “windows in heaven” that once surrounded and protected the earth that fell also? Gen 6,7,8,9; 2 Peter 2,3 the earth standing in the water and out of the water?
The content on this channel is so compelling. I've never seen such a thorough, well produced and information packed series backing up Creationism with hard science.
While I already have faith in the Bible and Lord Jesus Christ these videos have really reinforced that faith.
I agree. I'm glad these guys are teaching the truth of the bible and the issues with evolutionism. I've been trying to do that on my channel as well for the past year
Radioactive decay not only proves we have a young earth the very atomic elements of it being but thousands of years old rather than millions, but also that the Genesis flood was indeed a universal one and not merely confined to some small locality.
When you say universal surely you mean global...🤔
It is so refreshing to learn science from an objective scientist who has the courage to acknowledge The Creator and take the evidence wherever it leads.
The power of paradigm, "if evidence doesn't fit with your paradigm, we have tendency to exclude, discard or ignore it."
Very compelling evidence of a young earth based upon the scientific method.
With all the respect in the world, aren't you really forcing square pegs into round holes until your belief system becomes the truth instead of the other way around?
Tom King, of course I do not believe in the Big Bang and a billions and billions of years old universe. The universe is indeed 6000 years old. BUT the scriptures say nothing about the age of the EARTH. In genesis account, clearly, the earth pre-existed the creation of universe.
So we cannot tell exactly how old is the earth. And since the radiometric methods of age measure is not reliable, we are at a dead end on the matter.
No it is not, nothing in this video is compelling, it just shows a deluded interpretation of what geologists are finding, he's cherry picking certain things that he can mold into a biblical interpretation yet he ignores the rest of the very revelent evidence that would scupper his claims. Plus he clearly is totally misrepresenting science when he discusses carbon 14 and his claims over its depletion.
@@genome616 "...Plus he clearly is totally misrepresenting science when he discusses carbon 14 and his claims over its depletion." Howso?
The problem is that there is no evidence to show what he is cherry picking. The scientific method involves more than what someone says. It involves evidence, where is the evidence for your God?
I suspect when an athiest claims they dont believe, more often than not what they really mean is "i dont want to believe".
Great video, makes me wish I had a science background so I could appreciate the evidence more fully.
It’s easy to
Follow ask for wisdom
Almost everything taught about Chemistry, Geology, Glaciology, Volcanology, Astronomy, Botany, etc., is a pack of lies.
Excellent presentation
Coal and petroleum contain no radioactive carbon C¹⁴ because there was no decay of N¹⁴ before the flood due to high amounts of protective water vapour in the stratosphere. This may also explain a too early dating for very ancient civilisations (like Karahan and Göbleki Tepe). The amount of C¹⁴ had to slowly build up first...
Stunning info! Thanks!
This series is so well done. So much great information and well produced. Thank you for your efforts!
I agree I devoted my channel to teach the bible and point out the issues in evolutionism. These guys make me happy I'm not alone.
Genesis 7:11. First time water, second time fire.
No one outside of his family listened to Noah, will we do any better this time?
and a third time when God returns it will be fire again.
I hope you're not praying for that! "Hate the sin, not the sinner! the saying goes!
And II Peter 3 - "By water also, the world of that time was deluged and destroyed. By the same word, the present heavens and earth are reserved for fire, being held for the day of judgment and destruction of ungodly men."
Thanks Del and Andrew . The DVD is Genesis History ? is excellent. It is good to see the full interviews that you did with the contributors to the DVD . Well edited Del. Also the extra interviews on the DVD are excellent too especially Douglas Kelly on church history collapse of Christianity and Larry Vardiman on the Ice Age . Diamonds and graphite are both essentially carbon ! God bless you both.
My people perish for lack of knowledge BECAUSE they reject knowledge Hosea 4:6
This is my favorite TH-cam channel! Please keep the lectures coming. I cannot get enough.
Sucks that we've been lied to all our lives about history, But what more amazing is how many still will believe the lie.
Same where you indoctrinated into this religion as well?
Daniel this is not religion. The Lord is greater than religion.
Thank you so much
I wish this was taught in school for the kids
Praying for our children to know the truth and to not be led stray by the devil
Thank you God for this
Is the soundtrack on the end credits available somewhere to purchase? Love it.
I took an anthropology class in university many years ago...EVERY example of fossils presented then as fact, have been proven to be false and not used by evolutionists themselves.
I admired my professor as l completed an essay entitled Creation vs. Evolution. He read it with an open mind and gave me a very fair grade. My concluding sentence stated that it takes more faith to believe in evolution than in creation...it is worthy to note that since that time, there has been much more creation evidence produced supporting creationism and a young earth...great video here...
do you still have that paper?
@Dugie Doogs The actual age of geologic formations has monumental implications. As Andrew Snelling mentioned in the video there is in fact a spiritual component in geology. It is the elephant in the room that many choose to ignore.
I don't think that all carbon 14 forms in the atmosphere. Some, yes. But not all.
Very little of "Accepted" Science has anything to do with what is true.
Then everyone clapped.
Do electo, magnetic, micro, xrays have an effect on the decay of radio activity?
Since there were 'waters beneath the earth', and lots of them, could there also have been life down there in the darkness as well? Cavers are always coming across 'new' life forms that live completely in the darkness.
Please, please, please continue to challenge the paradigm of the evolutionists!!!! 🙏 I love all the work that has gone into these videos. It has really strengthened my faith even more. I pray for all of you....that God will continue to reveal Himself through this beautiful world that He created!!
I always find it interesting when dogma gets replaced
The simplicity of truth is imply awesome! God is so awesome!!
Carbon 14 is produced from nitrogen. Nitrogen is present in some diamonds as a coloring agent. If exposed to radiation they could have carbon 14 in them.
Thanks again guys.
TRUTH HIDDEN IN PLAIN SIGHT❤❤❤❤❤
This explains so much. A branch of science thats had me scratching my head.
This is so, so incredible.
Once again thank you Del Tackett great video
awesome-thanks so much
I really appreciate these videos! Fantastic information!
Excellent !
Thank you, this is a good interview. Interesting
Interesting :) But one thing that I'm not sure I understood is how the carbon 14 came into the diamonds and why it helps the biblical time frame that they found carbon 14 in the diamonds?
I’m not a Rocket Scientist! I’m extremely glad that y’all are finally putting all these doubting Thomas’s to rest. And finally thinking outside the box. God Bless y’all for staying with what God said instead of Man.
Thank you, that answers some questions I had. Keep up the good work.
"in the beginning"...lets us know.."there will be an end as well"...good video to confound their science...
I agree. Isn't it funny that the most arguments come from genesis and revelation. 2 Peter 3 says in the last days there will come scoffers willingly ignorant of the creation, flood, and coming judgment
Theirs is not science, ours is.
On a side note: secular researchers have verified this. Light speed has SIGNIFICANTLY slowed since the first precise measurements.
awesome, I'd love to see a source for this so I can show others.
Who was the secular researchers you are talking about ?
@@12centuries Google, the Northern Cross, by Aquilla Fleetwood, youtube!
Htos 1av, we are waiting for a response!
Amazing!!!
The scientific method, like math, is a gift from God that humanity doesn't deserve. Thank you posting these videos. Science and faith in God compliment each other and in no way contradict each other.
Dinosaurs
6000 to 4.54 Billion you are way off.
@@slingslang2934 huh? Is that a question or the word of the day?
dragons,you call them dinosaurs,there are some still alive,you must research to find it,but true,also dragons are not millions of years old,this is also now proven,you must dig for it,do your own research, its there,right here on planet earth,while its still here for a short time,believe me,the colleges or mainstream media will never admit it until they are nailed to the wall
I like your videos, interesting theories. I would like to hear you do a video on the Astronomy problem for young earthers. Namely that Astronomers generally coordinate with old earth geological timelines. It's worth addressing and I would like to hear your side.
Thanks, very informative. God's peace be with you all.
Very interesting and compelling evidence. Even if secular scientists don’t believe in God, they should still be willing to accept the Creation Timeline when scientific evidence supports it.
Great video!
Ty brother, stuning. God bless
Great honest presentation, God bless you.
Incredible. You may need every platform available to get this out .
Great work guy's 👍
Excellent series!
....Finally some intelligent discussions on these topics....How many church pastors does the world have ??...vs....How many Christian scientists, looking at things without agnostic spectacles do we have ??...I say the ratio is lop- sided and we have needed Christian scientists immensely. I ran a Hewlett Packard gas chromatograph machine in college. I could easily see how data could be manipulated to serve an agenda...Take the agendas out, and you get truth....
I love the excuses "machine error" ,"contamination". They won't ever accept it. I wonder why evolutionist claim not to believe in miracles but use them more than any belief system on earth to explain the way they think. Ridiculous. But nothing is impossible for God. So I pray for them.
If it actually is "machine error" then how can they trust any data the machine produces. Throw it all out, its unreliable.
This is all conjecture. I believe in slow creation.
Well, maybe not...
Questions...
1. How much radio carbon is there in dinosaur fossils?
2. How much radio carbon is there in woolly mammoth bones found frozen in the tundra that are not fossilized but still have meat on their bones?
I'm curious as to what this difference would show...
Excellent.
Thank You 🙏🏻
Appreciate the content. So many variables for radioactive decay. Anyone who thinks dating of anything is reliable by radioactivity alone should reconsider that assertion.
But there is many more ways to date things, thereby no variables.
@@lutkedog1 All based on several assumptions and therefore not reliable.
Thank you so much for this series
Brilliant!
very interesting, thank you!
2 great men on a mission.
Great video and absolutely fascinating
"They will be willingly ignorant" - 1Peter
Very interesting presentation. I would like to understand more about the isotope dating in rocks explanation which this clip started on. What is meant by "accelerated decay" ?
Glad you enjoyed the video, @donkloos9078! The accelerated decay Dr. Snelling is talking about here is in reference to the decay of radioisotopes. You can see further discussion on this in the following video on our TH-cam channel: th-cam.com/video/fe75Gnv28sU/w-d-xo.html
Accelerated decay means decay that was accelerated -- speeded up. It means decays rates would have been much faster in the past than they are today.
I think it's a million times harder to believe that the earth is billions of years old than to believe in God . . .
I agree everywhere you look you see design
Diamonds are produced by man everyday.
I suppose we should be explaining the bigger picture in a different way, beyond on what might be assumed.
To see the earth as made without the change that has happened over the century’s, made in perfection by the God of love.i don’t need proof I take the scriptures as the truth,this is faith.
True, but how are you answering nonbelievers in your faith? Or are you keeping your faith to yourself and avoiding all other points of view?
Thank you !
Carbon14 is a reliable time-measurement method for creatures that have lived during X time. After a too long decay time the Carbon14 signal will "drown" in the background (radioactive) noise that is everywhere (signal to noise ratio). That is logical, regarding the test method and the half-value of decay time for Carbon 14 (half time is 5730 years). So when samples of (more than) 50000 years ago are tested on C14 decay they all show "the same time" That tells nothing about their age. Sorry, not a scientific approach here regarding this subject (decay C 14). 5 feb. 2021.
What geological timescale does it take for diamonds to develop?
Just wondering how do we account for the oil in the ground. Doesn’t that take millions of years to form?
Alan Olney Yes.
Scientific proclamation should be studied and questioned at all times, we must and should challenge it..
So the question of heat was brought up that should have happened during accelerated decay. The answer was that since the radio halos are still there/visible, there must not have been a lot of heat produced. Do we know how it is possible to have a lot of accelerated decay without heat? Couldn't it also be evidence that this accelerated decay then did not happen? I'm a creationist myself, but I'm just trying to figure out how this data is interpreted.
Mind Blown!!! :)
Exciting
It’s so fascinating that as we understand the ways of the world and every knew discovery, it seems to go only one direction, towards God/YEC.
It also reminds me of the Bible verse where God says that He will make the “wisdom of the world” look foolish.
A suggestion: use a Diamond from Arkansas
Excellent evidence!!!! 👍👍👍
The other problem with Dating methodology they use for something that old is the same as saying how long a candle has been burning. You have to first know how long the candle was before it was set on fire. Was it 6 feet or 6 inches long? You don’t know so they just say millions and billions to ease their minds.
Only thing that makes sense, brilliant just brilliant.
I agree these guys make me happy they are also teaching the bible and issues with evolutionism
How come there is no human in the fossil record? Please explain?
Thanks for this. Just more reasons for why I cannot figure out why we "need" billions of years as Christians, and why I would ever even take atheism seriously for a moment.
Are there any fossils of human bones mixed with dinozaur fossils or sea creatures from the time of flood? If humans and those animals lived and died together there should be some evidence of that, right?
Amazing content
Thanks for your good testimony of Genesis and the Biblical reminding! God and those truth-seekers will remember this even if some people have been willingly ignorant of this.
They did not give a "good testimony" - they did the same toxic idiotic demonic regurgitation of lies and lunacy that's been spoon-fed to them for decades - they are totally devoid of the truth.
One of your best.
Keep 'em coming.
Deep time worshipers must be puckering.
I love it, because the more ridiculous their beliefs become, the more bizarre their theories have to be ...
Like "Hopeful Monster" , "Punctuated Equilibrium" and (Har Har Har) Panspermia.
ROTFLMHO
Rob
my question is were these samples tested at diff labs with diff equipment. cuz if they were all tested on the same equipment, then the lab could have been contaminated or the equipment contaminated. if they r all yielding the same then I would want diff labs testing so I would know it wasnt juat contamination.