Discussion on Bridge the Divide Podcast (James Tour Debate)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 มิ.ย. 2023
- Dave appears on Bridge the Divide to discuss his recent debate with James Tour.
Originally streamed 5/26/23 on the Bridge the Divide channel: • Bridge the Divide Live...
Watch my other debunks/debates/discussions: bit.ly/ProfDaveDebunk
EMAIL► ProfessorDaveExplains@gmail.com
PATREON► / professordaveexplains
Check out "Is This Wi-Fi Organic?", my book on disarming pseudoscience!
Amazon: amzn.to/2HtNpVH
Bookshop: bit.ly/39cKADM
Barnes and Noble: bit.ly/3pUjmrn
Book Depository: bit.ly/3aOVDlT
![Yoshi Rinrada - 'มาทำไม' [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/r41xbfRLkLs/mqdefault.jpg)
![[FULL EP.13] เซียนหรั่ง พา ไททศมิตร ลงเรือฝึกสกิลหว่านแห | เฮ็ดอย่างเซียนหรั่ง | One Playground](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EWFuf2Av0K0/mqdefault.jpg)
![[풀영상] 2024 김연경 초청 세계여자배구 올스타전 "팀 스타 VS 팀 월드" [유료광고 포함] #김연경 #국가대표 #배구 #배구올스타전 #팀스타 #팀월드](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/SUKUgH1ltng/mqdefault.jpg)
It was an honor to have you over for this discussion, Dave, and my gratitude for your generosity in reposting. All the best and can't wait for the next one!
It was great watching the debate live in your channel. Had a good time. Kudos!
Great interview and great questions!
I think nothing represents science miscommunication more than the sound of Tour yelling MR. FARINA!! Makes me giggle thinking about it
I have that sound etched into my brain lol
Aron Ra ALWAYS showing up is the best part of literally every big creationism-science debate. It's so funny to know that Christians probably think that Satan actually showed up.
Aron is a beautiful soul (metaphorically speaking :P)
I appreciate Aaron Ra separating himself from R/atheist and R/christianity types. And seeking to debate with relevant theologically educated people. Far too often I see a condemnation of the entire concept of religiosity without any actual analysis and Aaron brought nuance to an age of internet atheism that I can very much appreciate.
It's funny hiw you generalise all Christians as "science-denying sheeple". Thank you for reinforcing the Reddit atheist stereotype. It's also weird how you only seem to target Christians and not other religious groups 😂😂
Aron's consistency and compassion are so admirable.
I wouldn't know Ra (or his voice) if I saw (or heard) him; from what I've read about him though suggests he's pretty laid back & would find you guys kinda creepy.
Dave brings up some good reasons why not to debate--the time is too short to get an decent explanation across. It's about theater, not about ideas.
Exactly. Some of the chemistry involved is way beyond most people and it would take longer to explain the basics than the entirety of the debate time. Heck even for most people that have undergrad degrees in chemistry wouldn’t have enough knowledge to fully understand everything discussed, I know I am one of those people.
Yeah if your interlocutor isn’t acting in good faith the format is prone to gish galloping.
That's why when someone cries they wanted to learn you can tell they are lying. No one learns in a debate, it's all about entertainment. That's why debate "shows" really don't care about moderating.
@@NinjaMonkeyPrime You can learn about techniques in rhetoric if you haven't seen some before.
Honestly though, not even sure what the moderators are for if the debate doesn't intend to uphold truthfulness of arguments presented.
@@NewNecro Moderators in debates are just like a referee in a pro wrestling match. They are just decorative.
I hadn't heard of Bridge the Divide before this, but I found him to be a rather remarkable interviewer here. Hopefully after sharing your discussion on your much larger channel more of your audience will check him out, like I did!
I been subbed and participate at JL's channel Bridge the divide for a while now and he truly is an amazing person. I might catch you over there in the next live chat.
I discovered him when he streamed the debate and it was a pleasant surprise!
I haven't heard of the channel either but I knew about JL a long time ago, he's a cool dude
Hey Dave, first, LOVE the JT debate! You crushed it. Any chance of doing more debates like this?
I certainly would, though I'm not sure I could find another apologist opponent willing to do it after they saw what I did to James.
@@ProfessorDaveExplainsIn my opinion, sir, the only job of an Apologist is to be seen as arguing against the proposition in question.
Not to answer, not to discuss, not to convince, nor to persuade, but only to allow believers to assure themselves that the question has been addressed, so they can safely dismiss it.
So in the sense that James Tour was seen by his followers opposing you, he succeeded.
In the best case, your information might have penetrated some nascent doubters, so that weighs in the plus column.
@@antondovydaitis2261 I would say tour's "im going after people who dont read the literature" will be a gem for posterity against his followers, just like ham's _no evidence will change his mind._
@@jstevinik3261
Debating is just a theatrical act. Anyone who does full time every day is a fiend.
@@Bollibompa Or not broke. Also, Dave really exposed Tour. He should go after others.
As a water treatment professional and operator I truly appreciated Dave’s piece on water. He is very good at every aspect of making a thorough lesson on this stuff.
I am so mad I took a flight down there from NYC to be at the Debate and because he "reserved" so many seats I couldn't get in I was a few people behind Aron Ra glad he got in love your work Dave you are great I listen to all your stuff while working and gaming my wife thinks I am weird that i listen to your science stuff alot lol
Thanks for introducing me to this podcast, Dave! Found a lot of cool channels this way.
Dave touched on this around the 28 min mark but I feel like he needed to hammer this point way harder. The whole strategy was God of the gaps. If Dave showed a paper showing successful side chain creation at whatever perfect ratio needed, they would have moved on to the next thing we didn't know.
The moderator even demonstrated this to an absurd degree when he mentioned how we havnt been able to synthesize the different types of mRNA.
Anyway love your work Dave, I just feel like you have to focus on their bad faith strategy itself, as the science is way over almost everyone's head
What a great interviewer ❤Thanks for introducing his channel Dave. ❤
Awesome content dave, I began the journey into the flat earth rabbit hole almost a year ago. You pulled me out and inspired me to study some physics, thank you. Stay awesome 👍
Hearing Dave say he’s got 4 more in the chamber when it comes to the DI makes me very excited.
Thanks for platforming JL, Dave, he truly deserves it....
He embarrassed himself in the debate. The lack of intellectual engagement was astonishing. How does Dave have any fans after that?
@@jwatson181embarrased himself how?
@@luchalegend2185 confusing insults with engaging the arguments.
@@jwatson181 🤦♂️
@@luchalegend2185 agreed. It was embarrassing.
Tour: " phospholipids! Clueless!"
Dave: " here's a paper that precisely explains exactly that."
Tour: " it's not Prebiotic!!!"
Dave: " yes, they accounted for that, see these methods."
Tour: " on the chalkboard!!"
It was insane
The issue with the chalkboard stunt that Dr James Tour did was that it was a 17 to 18 step process to properly diagram all the chemistry needed to get the results and it would have taken Dave more time to draw the results than the debate actually lasted.
His use of the blackboard was so obviously a slimy Tactic rather than something to be helpful. It was infuriating how he got away with it.
Watching them tear into Tour makes my day
Also, Tour seems like he knows that Dave is right. He is just also a pathological liar who uses his faith as a weapon and lies about the science he knows is true.
Tour: DO YOU HAVE A REFERENCE ON THAT?!!
Dave: Yeah I have papers
Tour: DAVE CAN'T ADDRESS THE PAPERS!! HE DOESN'T KNOW CHEMISTRY!!
Dave pulling up to the debate: Well here, I have a bunch of pap--
Tour in the debate: NOO YOU HAVE TO DRAW IT ON THE BOARD!!!!
I really appreciate how you've exposed the Discovery Institute.
Some of Tour's defenders seem to be legitimately credulous (rather than creationist stooges). I hope that those people become curious enough to look into the DI, so they can recognize the tactics being used by Tour, and why he decided to target abiogenesis specifically.
The embarrassment from his outbursts likely shocked a few to be a little more critical.
@@HH-ru4bjwere you no embarrassed for Dave?
@@jwatson181 why would I be? I made the comment about some of tours students potentially being embarrassed because they had an investment with being at the debate to support your. I have no relationship with Dave to be embarrassed by.
@@HH-ru4bj I am embarrassed for James as well. With that said, Dave was probably a bit worse with the personal attacks. It was a bad look for organized debates. Did you not have a problem with the personal attacks?
@@jwatson181 I did have a problem, which is why I didn't watch it past the opening until later in the evening.
I really like this guy, fantastic interviewer.
It's hard to debate against someone who gish-gallops in front of people who don't know any better because as they say, "a lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is still putting It's boots on".
That "moderator" was as fake as his rug.
Certain science denial conspiracy types are just moronic on the surface. But James Tour's stuff is particularly malicious because he's a legit chemistry professor and he can sound to the uneducated like he knows what he's talking about by throwing out all the jargon and go over people's heads - people who already have a religious objection to abiogenesis and are predisposed to just accept it all at face value at the outset.
Fun interview, thanks!
How does that guy still keep arguing with science? I mean this is just incredible, I give him that!
It pays
At this point it might be fair to say Dave's job is to embarrass Tour and THEN science communication lol. Keep fighting the good fight Dave.
I like this interview very much. Thanks for it & best wishes from Munich!
loved your jt debate, been a viewer since 3 years and love your videos
just bumping your algorithm , great job as always
We need more Daves. Desperately. Science ignoring theocrats have always been a problem, but nowadays we get science hostile journalism and politicians which is plain dangerous. Don't ever shut your mouth and keep speaking up!
Oh wow, J.L. has a dazzling smile.
The crazy thing about flat earthers having an issue with you, is that they want to believe their crap without actually learning anything. Some people just love learning and value education. I'm a student of Psychology and soon Biology, but I still learn about most subjects because i love learning. I have watched your tutorials on several subjects and never thought twice about how you cover so many topics. You have not ever made any reservations about how experts and doctoral graduates are writing your tutorials. You're an educator. Not a lying grifter like James Tour. That guy is a narcissistic nutjob.
Thank you for all you do, and for introducing another excellent content creator to support (JL).
Inellectually dishonest people are ready to call themselves experts in any subject with a couple google searches and then get upset with Dave for refusing to call himself an expert even though he knows more than them.
The honesty from people who properly represent science comes across as not being sure about the topic.
JL aka Bridge the Divide is a legend.
I was surprised that the debate organizers, and presumably Tour, agreed to this as the debate question.
Even if we have some clue, we are not clueless. Takes just above zero evidence to not be clueless.
Stupidity is an essential ingredient of creacrap.
Hey Dave, quick answer on that prion question near the end: a prion is a protein that is, essentially, contagiously misfolded. The sequence of amino acids remains the same, but secondary structures (on up) are altered, and altered in such a way that when the prion isoform encounters a normal molecule of that protein it will force the normal molecule into the prion form. Atop that, at least some are resistant to proteases, which is just great. As you might expect, the conversion can continue exponentially, with each new prion capable of inducing the misfolding of more normal proteins. This also means that they're transmissible; if not sufficiently denatured, eating prion-contaminated meat (etc.) can cause you to "catch" it. Naturally, mad cow (bovine spongiform encephalopathy) is strongly suspected to have originally occurred spontaneously in a cow or sheep and then to have been spread due to being made into bone meal (etc.) and fed to other cows.
Two bonus fun facts: First, there is one protein involved with mad cow, scrapie, and most other examples of prions we've discovered, and it is actually named "major prion protein" (or PrP) thanks to that; it's not the only protein that can become a prion but it's a standout. Second, thanks to our evolutionary similarity (i.e. the presence of a PrP homolog in humans), "mad cow" is apparently transmissible from contaminated beef into humans; the resulting disorder is called "Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease", which comes with psychiatric problems, pain, changes to behavior, and about a 13-month life expectancy once symptoms start arising. (And, as an inference, because Tour's particular brand of psychiatric problems have been going on for longer than 13 months mad cow is probably not to blame.)
Dave you should do a detailed video on one of those OoL papers for the benefit of Tour's students.
I was gonna call my podcast Bridging the Divide but I guess I can’t do that anymore lol.
JL @Bridge the divide is a stand up dude. Watched the debate live over there and great to see this interaction. Thanks Dave
I love how research isn't evidence but writing an equation and shrieking about how it could happen is. James was running out the clock at best.
awesome!
This is excellent! A few months ago Nobel laurate and OOL leading researcher Dr. Jack Szostak gave a lecture at Arizona State University on the current state of OOL research. The YT vid can be found at
*The Origin of Life: Not as Hard as it Looks? Jack Szostak, Spring 2023 Eyring Lecturer*
I'd love to see blowhard Tour address all the recent discoveries Dr. Szostak presented, but he won't. 🙂
Have you ever read Tour's apology to Sosztac for calling him.a liar? It's a hilarious study in passive aggressive language, and then Tour goes into some multi-page diatribe with the same debunked talking points as the lecture, sorry, sermon, that got him in trouble in the first place.
Yes I remember seeing that the date all he wanted you to do was write on the board wasn’t showing any evidence And all he was doing was yelling
Hey, Dave. Saw the debate with James Tour. It is appalling how completely unprofessional he, the audience, and even the moderator were. You definitely handled yourself far better than any of them did. It's great seeing scientists like you and Forrest Valkai completely tearing down all the pseudoscience, science denial, and blatant lying about science by creationists and flat earthers alike.
To be sure, dave is an educator, not a scientist. Tour is a scientist, but is also a liar
@thomasneal9291 it's an embarrassing state of affairs (specifically for people like Tour) when they try to use THEMSELVES as an authority, but yet are completely clueless about what they're saying.
That "debate" was like three bullies dogpiling on one victim at once - only to be trounced by that "victim"...
@@juhanipolvi4729 my thoughts exactly. Dave was the definitive victor of this debate. Everyone else was disqualified due to their unprofessional and immature conduct.
@@thomasneal9291 Oh for sure, I know Dave has also said something similar as the following, that is that his (Dave's) job is easier to defend as he doesn't need to do as much as he just need to present what actual authorities says is the current best/most likely explaination. Tours on the other hand, have to show that the research is wrong and why it's wrong.
辛苦了 : ) from Malaysia
Dave… that was the best “Rope-A-Dope” I’ve ever seen in a science setting.
Tour was raging like a drunk in a dive bar wanting to fight with pool cues and you just kept your cool and didn’t take the bait.
LOL
So we are legalizing racial discrimination based on belief now?
Hi professor Dave, I was wondering you could do some videos on AI? I have some trouble understanding it, your expositions are always thourough and nice.
Jews have been saying the creation myth is allegory for thousands of years. It’s not difficult to believe in God and accept science. It’s just remarkable how absurd these apologists are.
Hey, Dave, could you make a series analysing Jonathan Mclatiche's response to your Michael Behee video?
He wrote an article or something titled
"Answering Farina on Behe’s Work: Bacterial Flagella"
And likely other such documents on you Michael Behee video
So, could you make a video on those documents ?
Don't worry I will. Any asshat over there who tries to debunk me will be exposed.
@@ProfessorDaveExplains Thanks man, and take care.
JL is a great guy and a great interviewer. Thanks Professor 🤙 love you bro.
I still think your debate with dave weiss (flat earth dave) was more fun to watch than the tour debate. The tour debate was kind of difficult to follow at some times, while everything flat earth dave said was just obviously and hilariously stupid.
it gave us gems like "daylight is not from the sun", and "spectroscopy needs to be in a container"
While not a science highlight, my favorite part was when Dave dropped his first F-bomb and five old, pinched faced religious nut job plants got up and walked by me muttering, “he’s just awful… I can’t listen to this” before one caught sight of my “Not Today Jesus” shirt.
Because it was so packed, my wife and I had to sit apart. She ended up next to two more religious plants, that were more pleasant, but had been asked to be there by their pastor.
Totally stacked audience and not at all representative of Rice. Actually, the heckling towards Tour was coming mostly came from students.
Hey Dave, I've got high definition videos of erupting volcanoes if you wanna use some. Even have drone video!
I think there is one major logical error Tour and others do in these exchanges. They basically want you to recreate a process which took billions of years and many, many different molecules and wildly varying conditions in drastically shorter time (days to a few years) under lab conditions. This is obviously impossible at the current time and IF they understand it, completely dishonest. The only way we can research such long and gigantic processes is by reconstructing stages and steps of the whole which are the clues that it could have happened this way or similarily.
right off the bat “oh didn’t know you could steal someone’s stuff.” lol
James isn't wrong BECAUSE he is a liar. He is wrong AND he is a liar.
James is a liar BECAUSE what he is saying is wrong and he isn't stupid enough to think that what he is saying is not wrong.
Dave, your guess about the currency RON was right! It's Roman lieu
Hey Dave. Has Cameron Betruzzi taken you up on your offer to do a live discussion with you and that scientist he had on that "reviewed" the Tour debate?
He and Rimmer both declined. Cowards.
@@ProfessorDaveExplains Yeah. I guess those creationist numbskulls don't want their audience to see what incredulous liars they are. That's apologists for ya.
@@ProfessorDaveExplains of course they did. They know they purposely misrepresented the entire thing, and they have no defense to that.
I'd really love to hear more about the lessons Dave picked up from comedy performers, if he ever wants to share. Mash in how music relates to his influences, or the way it's influenced by his other practices. Would love to hear how he developed bc I admire how straightforward, blunt, & balanced (as in fair-minded, but also with tone/code-switching to match or counter escalating behaviour like Tour's) Dave is, without losing either the big picture or nanoscopic details of his argument vs the other person's argument + tactics. As an invertebrate aspiring to grow a spine, I feel I'd learn as much from that Prof Dave video as I do with all Prof Dave videos.
It was a 100% win for Professor Dave! Tour was only crying like two six years old kids which are debating about pokemon strength...
Never heard of JL, but I'm glad I did. Seems like a great guy!
Do you know of the Hibbeler Production doc, "Level With Me?" Seeing that debunked would be very satisfying.
Pretty sure scimandan does a debunk of that.
Unable to find it
I had no clue Knodel had died until now.
Looking forward to watching this! Prof Dave, you should debate RFK Jr. on Joe Rogan's podcast! It would be amazing to see you smash that fraud.
I'd like to see that too
Yes, he is dangerous. His antivax views are harming people.
Actually, yeah, that'd be pretty good.
Enjoyed the debate and this follow-on, Dave. All I can say about J. Tour is that he, like so many other apologists, epitomize the concept of Confirmation Bias. They know what they believe, they don't care what you can prove otherwise. They will cherry-pick and quote-mine anything they can that seems to confirm their beliefs. Yes, I agree with your point that religion deforms the growth of science and rationality in society. All cults do.
You should have seen the ID vs Science debate at the AMNH. Bill Dumbski was reduced to stammering.
Dave, what are you going to do with the artwork Tour gave you?
@Bridge The Divide is one of the best channels on TH-cam. JL has some of the best arguments against science denialism, young earth creationism, and fundamental religion. Plus he has a huggable character.
yep, he cool
55:45 the thing with "rocks dont reflect light" is just as stupid as the vacuum should suck the atmosphere argument; their only context for the phenomenon of reflection is a mirror so they literally dont know diffuse reflection is a thing..as a grown up person
They don't know how eyes work... something children learn.
I watched the hovind documentary and liked it so much that i have it downloaded in case i lose cell service for a while
Maybe have an online course presenting strategies when debating science denying "experts."
Wait, the moderator is a Young Earth Creationist? Because that would be ridiculous.
He's also a friend of Tour's
@@_Omega_Weapon Sounds like Tour wanted the debate to be as rigged as possible.
The best interviewer is the one who asks short questions.
Professor Dave is great though.
Dave makes Ahegao face at 47:36 🥴
To Tour I quote the priest Abbe Boureois 'there is no such thing as a biblical chronology. It is the business of science, to establish the date upon which man 1st appeared on the earth.'
Tour seems a little mentally ill
"Your thoughts, real quick, on that moderator. And not that thing he shot out in the woods on his head." 🤣 I had completely forgotten about that. I legit felt bad for the guy because whoever provided him with it and said it looked fine did him a huge disservice.
Then he opened his mouth and said things I could verify weren't true with 30 seconds of search engine use, so I didn't feel so bad.
As much as I kind of figured why you were largely ignoring his chalkboard requests, I think it would have been nice to physically point out how ridiculous it was. Like, pull up any paper and show the complex schemata involved in the chemical reactions and how ludicrous it would be to write it out in a five minute response. Just drive that point home to the audience that may not understand and interpret you as 'not being able to'.
Experimental for determining the magnetic field in the space outside straight
conductors
Apparatus
• Current conductor
• Clamping device
• Power supply
• Digital Teslameter
• Hall probe
• Current transformer
• Digital multimeter
• A meter scale
• Barrel base
• Support rod
• Connecting cords
PLE CAN YOU GENERATE A CIRCUIT DIAGRAM FOR SUCH AN EXPERIMENT GIVEN ALL THIS APPARATUS🙏🙏🙏
I still invite an open criticism of my black hole theory. Available on the channel of my posts, right here on TH-cam.
Just to set the tone, Wee Jimmy Tour is a prat. I suspect he's probably also a young earth creationist (but keeps it quiet to keep Rice off his back), and for all I know could even be a flat earther!
He is, he admited it in a video made by the DI that "he was not sure about the age of the earth, science says something but he has not checked".
Dunno about flat earth.
I think he's just a grifter who knows he's lying to the audiences he panders to
@@Julian0101 Ah, ok. He doesn't make a meal of it, though, I guess he knows it would paint him as the total whackaloon he is!
@@TasTheWatcher I think all creationists know they are lying about the science evidence. Most don't even know what it is.
11:09 Wouldn't be suprised if james tour decideds to make another video and take this out of context. xd
Regardless of Daves background, he have knowledge of so many topics, like 20 times more than normal dude. And his understanding of scientific papers over different fields and the way he explains this stuff, even he's honest his expertise he really understands what he's talking about. And many times straight from his head. This equals: prof Dave is very smart guy, every time I watch his videos, I learn a lot.
Those idiots who questioned Daves level of knowledge, they don't stand a chance to debate with him, nor they are not qualified even wash Daves underwear. 🙂
Keep up great way to spreading scientific real information 👍
Mikael from Finland 🇫🇮
Part of get educated in science is to learn how to understand things systematically (this is the part which sadly isn't taught at school early enough). So if rather new knowledge like "gender is not sex" comes along, people like Dave can engage with it. Even when disagreeing with it, this would happen on a different level than just refusing to understand it. This makes the case of Tour so interesting: He clearly had this ability but at some point decided to become an old and stubborn man and to be above that mental flexibility. For a university that should be the point to recognize that even an accomplished researcher with huge impact crossed his "best before..." date.
@@Schmidtelpunkt
I think Tour have lost it(mentally), he thinks only he knows stuff, putting down fellow scientists who have dedicated their lives for some fields, Tour thinks he can out smart everyone, no matter what qualifications others have.
There's word for this kind of behavior..?
And shouting to other and making fun of him, front of his own students, chalk in hand like it is a rod ful of power/info.
It was sad to watch he rage to Dave and being dishonest.
And if you are educated academic guy you wouldn't act like that front of bias class, and for sure should never attack anyone like he did. He's drunken by imagnitery power.
J Tour should not teach anything and if he is to senile to keep his act together, he should leave stage for good.
Farina is great and polite if needed, talking about facts.
And my opinion is, good to see someone exposes these weirdos.
Prof Dave rocks..
@@mikaelkaris9273 Tour is a raging narcissist who can never be wrong about anything, ever. The same mental incompetence shown by Trump.
Cthulhu funko!
I got a Pinhead myself.
What do we want, immunology! When do we want it? Now!
It's his favorite word because his last name is IMax.
RON (aka LEI) is Romanian currency
I will admit that I wasn't able to watch the whole debate. One reason is that due to a chronic illness, I have a rather limited amount of energy. Between not really understanding most of the technical terms -- I've never studied chemistry -- and therefore struggling to follow what was being said, and all the yelling by James Tour, I got to a point where my body said that's enough. Actually I did last until partly through the question period. I liked that there was one person who addressed the over-talking and yelling.
I'm glad that I did watch this video, because I did have a negative take on Dave's opening remarks in the debate. I didn't understand why he felt it necessary to criticize Tour's character. Of course that became somewhat clearer as the debate progressed. Or should I say, as Tour's demeanor regressed? But now that I understand Dave's motivation a bit better, it makes more sense to me.
One thing I don't like about debates in general is that they seem to be a very ineffective way to ascertain the truth of any given proposition. It always reminds me of two guys in a bar going out to settle their differences by physically fighting. In the end, the winner has not shown that he was right all along, only that he is a better fighter, at least on that particular day.
Now I see that Dave's main goal appears to be to show that Tour doesn't know what he is talking about, while at the same time bringing up what is actually going on in abiogenesis research. Viewed in this light, I can say that I believe that Dave succeeded. With a lot of help from James Tour, himself.
Thanks Dave. And thanks to all the other TH-camrs out there -- such as J L -- trying their best to combat the anti-science being spewed on the internet. Because of you, this Boomer is learning stuff nearly fifty years after graduating from high school.
Pretty sure that Tour was forced to apologise in some fashion in the student paper.
Yha but he didn't send it to Dave
@@211aonscratch4 💯% correct.... I'm pretty sure he had to apologise for his behaviour too.
The globebusters debacle was probably one of the best ever. There are other globe science channels that have done some great work going into detail about the ins and outs of how we know Earth is a sphere. But Dave's particular direct style on the subject was smart and hilarious.
Not sure if Dave knows about the famous blunder where Bob Knodel purchased a ring laser gyro to "prove" that there was no Earth rotation? If Earth rotates as described by current knowledge, the gyro should show a 15°/hr drift and that's exactly what it showed. Bob proceeded to try to come up with ANY other explanation than the Earth is simply a sphere that rotates. Unbelieveable 🤣
Thanks Bob. RIP.
@@thepapschmearmd His tombstone is gonna read - Bob "Thanks Bob" Knodel - 🤣
Before, there was a week gap between your zoology videos, but now they take FOREVER to be released.
sorry working on a bunch of different stuff, lots more coming soon i promise
@@ProfessorDaveExplains I just really like zoology, and I want to swallow any obscure piece of information that I can find.
@@billyr2904SAME
@@billyr2904 Same here
#NotClueless 😁👍
i watched the debate, i thought you were winning right up until he wrote clueless on the board.
And then you *knew* Dave was winning? 😁
Could you please debunk Joe dispenza
JL was great here
Just regret you didn’t ask J Tour if he had signed a statement of faith and if in his view The Bible has authority over scientific evidence! That would have exposed his bias in front of the audience or force him to “betray” his team.
hello
Dave, would you consider doing a rebuttal to Vaush’s ‘critiquing Professor Dave Explains “Let’s All Get Past This Confusion About Trans People”’ video? He’s a lefty who tries to argue the basis for trans being a social construct and thinks it’s a logically valid and sound position.
I don't think they even really disagree in the broad strokes so much as Vaush is talking about Sociology and Dave is talking about genetics and neurochemistry.
It would be interesting to hear them have a dialog, but I don't know that shooting refutations back and forth would be particularly useful for anyone.
That said, I'd be curious to hear what Dave thinks of Sabine Hossenfelder's take on science as it pertains to transgender issues.
Vaush is the dude that told an African-American woman that she was being racist, right? Dude is not really the sharpest knife in the kitchen.
Dave is always cordial until you start to insult him and I don't blame him I would never like to be made a fool of by somebody so I would go after them too if I was able... And Dave is pretty rock solid with science stuff so you can't BS science and not expect Dave to be able to break it down and make you look it like an idiot. If anyone who's denying science have any brains whatsoever they would be hiding from Dave.
I can hardly wait for the next DI takedown! 😂
Watching the debate you just know that Tour only wanted Dave to write complex diagrams on the board so he could swoop in on any mistake and claim it as evidence of Dave's "cluelessness."
Funny thing is James had a typo in the formula that went unnoticed until after.
@NinjaMonkeyPrime Well yeah, even a professor who has probably written amino acids on a chalkboard a million times will make a mistake now and then, right?
I'm just proposing that Tour was hoping Dave would make such a mistake so he could play at, "Look! Dave drew the molecule wrong! He's dumb! Ignore him!"
@@shassett79 Without a doubt James wanted to try and link Dave to the status of OoL research, which of course is silly.
@@NinjaMonkeyPrime Yep. Tour and his clown army want desperately to paint this as Tour vs. Dave Farina when it's actually *Tour vs. the entire OOL scientific community.* Tour knows he has no science to stand on which is why he refuses to publish his anti-OOL bull in any science journals. The game now seems to be damage control and keep trying to convince his idiot fans Dave Farina is really Satan's spawn. 😜