ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 มิ.ย. 2024
- A Mini lecture on some interactionist and social theories of 2nd language learning. Theories covered include
Long's Interaction Hypothesis
Swain's Output Hypothesis
Van Patten's Input Processing
Carroll's Induction Learning
www.nyack.edu/content/TESOL_Home
Thank you Professor. Your personal examples of "language acquisition" moments brought clarity and authenticity!
Thank you Dr. Tuzi! Great explanation of these concepts. I was approaching information overload while reading my textbook on SLA and decided to give video a try. Lo and behold, this aided my uptake incredibly.
Dr. Tuzi, I was a student of yours at Nyack. Listening now because I am a current student at SU for grad school
Best demonstration so far. Well explained
That was a really good explanation of the theories:-)
Thank you so much!
Thank you for explanations
Easy to digest and personal life real world results helped comprehensional input.
Thank you very much! Very useful information and presentation.
Thank you!:)
hi can you help me in answering this question : how can we apply long 's theory of interaction in class?
What is your opinion regarding the application of second language acquisition to attain fluency in dialects defined by knowledge domains, such as Physics, Biology, or Sociology. I feel that students face similar problems in tackling primary sources in these fields, and thus remain dependent on professors. Could these principles be used to unlock meaning of difficult texts?
Can you please do a video on corrective feedback?
tell me about just interactionism of noam chomsky...
I have presentation on it so kindly help me..
can't seem to find the "krashen burns" article
www.angelfire.com/az/english4thechildren/krashen.html
CARL SHENK -- DECEMBER 2, 2018 AT 5:35 PM -- www.benslavic.com/krashen-burn/#comment-51424
If the Google searches I’ve done are correct, this article was written by Jill Stewart, a rather conservative columnist, for the New Times LA (now defunct) in 1998 prior to the passage of Prop 227, which essentially did away with bilingual education in California. On the same day in 2016 when President Trump was voted in, Prop 58 passed by 3-1, nullifying Prop 227 and giving California districts the right to decide whether to use a bilingual approach or not, based on what seemed best in individual situations. I agree, though, that the tone used by this reporter is overly acerbic. In the interim she has worked for Pajamas Media, now PJ Media, which bills itself as a chief source of information for the Tea Party, and prides itself on such things as bringing Dan Rather’s sins to the light of day in 2004.
On a related note, I’m wondering what this PLC thinks about Australian John Hattie’s research and publishing, especially as it relates to his disagreements with Krashen’s theories on the value of reading. I’m asking this, not knowing if this PLC has discussed this in the past. I encourage you to check out this website and would value your feedback.
www.evidencebasedteaching.org.au/3-reasons-why-more-reading-wont-build-kids-vocabulary/
Re: Krashen and "Krashenite"
Postby Le Baron » Mon Oct 03, 2022 8:12 pm
Chameleon wrote:
What does watching "incomprehensible gibberish" have to do with Krashen? Krashen advocates for comprehensible input.
I was about to say, it's less Krashen's fault than the Krashen-burns who invoke his name. In any case he mostly talks about reading. Nevertheless I think rdearman's point still stands. I'm sick of people pretending they learned languages merely by watching hours of Netflix, it's complete bollocks.
forum.language-learners.org/viewtopic.php?t=16995&start=380
Good! thank you
but please slow down, I can't catch up with you
stop clapping!