Hugely important discussion, vital context, and encouraging conclusion. It has been said, if the gates of hell cannot prevail against the church, how will the bishops? 'When the tyrant dies his reign is over. When the martyr dies his reign begins'.
drj0hnashfieId315 assuming y0u are n0t speaking metaph0ricaIIy can y0u teII me, are the gates 0f heII metaI ? bearing in mind they need t0 be fire pr00f/retardant, w00den 0nes is a n0 n0 0bvi0usIy "it has been said" I0I y0ur credibiIity as a thinker 0r a gr0wn up evap0rates and y0u exp0se y0urseIf as guIIibIe and creduI0us when y0u menti0n the idea heII has gates are we aIs0 t0 assume the reign 0f the september 11 attackers began the sec0nd they hit the t0wers ? pathetic
A wonderful interview with this great shepherd🙏 It was such a great encouragement to meet this wonderful Bishop in Dublin last week🙏 Thank God there are other Bishops standing up also but there need to be a lot more🙏 We must cling to the Cross and trust that this evil at the heart of our Church will pass🙏
Greetings, Archbishop! I entered The Church via RCIA from a fundamentalist background. I received your wonderful Catechism a few days ago and love it already! I had been saving a pretty leather journal ~ I’m always taking notes ~ My notes from your book are going in my lovely journal, I’m sure I will be referencing it as I continue on my path. 🙏🏻🕯️💜🕯️🙏🏻 Blessed Be ~~~ I Bid You Peace ~~~
Reading Bishop Schneider's book Credo. Excellent. Every Catholic family should have a copy. Will potentially make up for the lack of catechesis we have experienced in the last 60 years. Thank you!
A wonderful and encouraging interview with a great shepherd, whose voice we listen to, understand and follow! We were very happy to have His Grace Bishop Scneider in Croatia last year and with great joy we keep him in our prayers!
Great question related to VII. When you divert from the core elements of the fath, it will not end well. It only takes one drop of poison to make a glass of water unfit to drink.
I live in Sydney Australia and it therefor follows , that I must apparently wait until March next year (2024) for for this much anticipated book to arrive ? Thank you both for bringing this conversation to the public square and may God continue to bless you both.
Thank you but for me it has not been so straight forward...My address keeps " rearranging " its self on their system ? I have contacted them but so far they have not replied..@@Knight-s2o
There has been a dramatic decline in standards of sexual morality in the World over the last fifty years. I can remember Princess Margaret coming on the wireless and announcing to the nation that, mindful of the teaching of the Christian Church, she would not be marrying Group Captain Peter Townsend. Now, in the Sunday Times this week end, we have an article by those who, while married, have agreed with their husband or wife that they might sleep with other people. I am pleased to say, though, that the response of most people in the comments section underneath to this sort of arrangement was “yuk” or words to that effect.
This conversation leaves out the reality of purposeful, malicious infiltration of Church governing bodies and living magisterium by her enemies. Who concretely are these people and/or organizations, what mechanisms are they using and what is their goal?
Dr Ashenden have you read Dr E Michael Jones’s book “Libido Dominandi: Sexual Liberation and Political Control.” The term is taken from Book 1 of St Augustine’s City of God. His book is the history of the sexual revolution from 1773 to the present. LD shows how sexual revolution was from its inception a form of control. From the book, “Those who wished to liberate man from the moral order needed to impose social controls as soon as they succeeded because liberated libido led inevitably to anarchy.”
And that catechism is deficient and contains many ambiguities. In catechesis I have always used either that of Trent or Baltimore. I will now be adding the Athanasian Catechism to my priestly work.
Gavin Ashenden says that anybody who cares for the Church as an institution would elect aa a Pope somebody who exemplifies the strongest things in the faith. You would think that that would be the case. You would hope that that would be the case. Yet many (most?) of the Cardinals appointed by Pope Francis do not seem to do so. So the question has to be asked; to what extent do they care even for the continuation and thriving of the Catholic Church as an institution? A further possibility is that the Cardinals will elect a Francis Mark II, thinking that they are electing a very different kind of Pope. How many of the Cardinals who voted for Jorge Bergoglio really understand what they were voting for? Francis has been very careful to avoid the Cardinals getting to know each other well. Furthermore, the next Pope could be someone who speaks clearly and avoids confusion but his clarity is the clarity of the ‘progressive’ agenda. That is probably Francis’s hope.
Why do we need another Catechism when we already have the Catechism of the Catholic Church Is this Catechim complied by Bishop Schneider complementary to the Catechism of the Catholic Church? I would be much obliged and grateful if the Bishop can provide an answer
These forms of address are complicated. For example, in Court, a High Court Judge is always “My Lord” but it would be great social faux pas to address him in private otherwise than simply as “Judge”. Similarly, while at the most formal level, a Duke is still “Your Grace”, once again, in a social setting, he would, only ever by addressed as “My Lord” and more usually, simply as “Duke”. For anyone who knows a Bishop reasonably well, he would address him simply as “Bishop”.
It is interesting, as you say, that Cardinal Parolin was able to send his letter to the German Bishops. It is not within his remit. As Cardinal Secretary of State, he is responsible for the foreign affairs of the Vatican City State and, in a general way, of the Apostolic See. He is not responsible for matters of doctrine or discipline within the Church. In sending a letter which, clearly, Cardinal Fernandez, as Prefect of the Holy Office, should have sent, he is, perhaps, sending a message to the whole Church and to the other Cardinals, in particular. Don’t vote for Cardinal Fernandez at the coming Conclave. He can no more be relied upon to uphold the doctrine of the Faith than Pope Francis. What is surprising is that his letter must have been authorised by the Pope - he would not have dared to send it on his own responsibility alone. Or, possibly, the Pope did know that he was about to send the letter and gave an ambiguous response to Cardinal Parolin’s request for approval, which he can, eventually, if it suits him, deny, using lack of authority for the letter as an excuse to remove Cardinal Parolin.
Thank you very much for this video, I have just one question: in which sense do you think the 2nd Vatican Council was ambiguous? I mean, could you be more precise with regard to specific texts or expressions? Thank you again!
Such a statement, made by a bishop in public, is a very serious thing, regardless of whether it is a lecture or not, and can do much good or much harm to the Church. As a catholic, I love and protect the Church
As you probably know, one of the works of mercy is to teach the unlearned. I would be very grateful for any references @@littlerock5256 , I would really appreciate, thank you!
My husband was a broadcaster and in his profession they had a saying “ keep it simple stupid” I am not being rude please , but read the Bible for yourself, Preferably the New Testament and I would recommend you start by reading the Gospel of of Matthew and then the Gospel of John If you are encouraged and being blessed with your eyes being opened go the The Acts of the Apostles, The Apostle Paul gave an excellent account of the works of the Early Church , Jesus said “ If you seek me with ALL YOUR HEART YOU WILL FIND ME, Trust in the Lord with ALL YOUR HEART ACKNOWLEDGE HIM IN ALL YOUR WAYS ABD He will direct your Path, men can confirm the Truth to you, BUT JESUS IS THE Truth ✝️He said I AM THE WAY THE TRUTH AND THE LIFE NO MAN COMES TO THE FATHER but through ME
“226. Then human dignity is not the same in all persons? No. The human person loses his dignity in proportion to his free choice of error or evil; e.g., the dignity of Adolph Hitler and St. Francis of Assisi are not the same.” Weird circular reference to Hitler.
Faith comes by hearing the Word of God as written in the Bible and nothing else other than that! Read Romans Chapter one it warns of the sin of marriage other than between a man and a woman , complicating it is twisting the TRUTH as written in the Bible,read also Johns Gospel chapter three IF YOU ARE TRULY SEEKING Truth ✝️
@@CC-cr1oz It is Schneider who has twisted the definition of a schismatic. According to Canon Law and Attwater's Catholic Dictionary, a schismatic is one who refuses to submit to the authority of the pope. Schneider changed it to those who refuse to recognize the Supreme Pontiff.
if you become so popular to catholic people you may be dismissed by the pope dear bishop as this papacy does not like to have any sort of person making statements concerning their deviant views of the deposit of faith.
Let’s examine the public record of Archbishop Vigano relative to the actions of Pope Francis: Accusation #1 by Archbishop Vigano [abbr.=AV]: The so-called “church” of Bergoglio does not hesitate to close churches, arrogating to itself the wicked right to deny God public worship and to deprive the faithful of the grace of the Sacraments through a wretched connivance with civil power. AV, to begin with, refuses to recognize that "Bergoglio" [the pope's family name] has been legitimately elected by the College of Cardinals. His official title is "Pope Francis." AV, consequently, is disrespectful and arrogant in not recognizing the office that he holds in the RCC. #2 AV accuses Pope Francis of "deny[ing] God public worship" and of "depriv[ing] the faithful of the grace of the Sacraments." What AV fails to tell us is that Pope Francis has, after due consultation, closed the churches of Vatican City temporarily in order to prevent further transmission of the coronavirus. Hence, there is neither "arrogance" or "wickedness" involved. On the contrary, it would be "wicked" and "irresponsible" NOT to take prudent measures to safeguard human lives. We are living in the time of a pandemic-a fact that AV wants to avoid. For more details, see www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-italy-rome-churche/rome-catholic-churches-ordered-closed-due-to-coronavirus-unprecedented-in-modern-times-idUSKBN20Z3BU Accusation #3 by AV: Pope Francis "tampers with the sublime and inviolable words of the Prayer which the Lord Himself taught us." AV fails to note that the "sublime and inviolable words" are written in Greek and that the New Testament has two very distinctive versions of the Lord's Prayer. The contemporary Our Father comes from a translation of the longer Greek version found in Matt 6:9-13. #4 AV also fails to tell us that the Church, as a faithful interpreter and transmitter of Christ, needs to create suitable translations into modern languages (e.g. Italian) in order to enable the faithful to pray in words they understand and in words that do not give them wrong ideas. Here are the facts of the case: Pope Francis has risked the wrath of traditionalists by approving a change to the wording of the Lord's Prayer. Instead of saying “lead us not into temptation”, it will say “do not let us fall into temptation”. The new wording was approved by the general assembly of the Episcopal Conference of Italy last month [Jun 6, 2019]. The new wording, it has to be assumed, is in modern Italian, and the changes apply only to the churches of Italy. Pope Francis, in collaboration with biblical and linguistic experts, changed the phrase "lead us not into temptation" to "do not let us fall into temptation," as mentioned in the gospel of Matthew 6:13, because the original translation implies that God induces temptation. The change, officials said, is closer to the original intent of the prayer. All in all, Archbishop Vigano shows himself to be incapable of fairly interpreting Pope Francis. Judging from just these four accusations, the reader can see that Archbishop Vigano clearly has no sympathy for Pope Francis and his prejudice leads him to make judgments that are neither accurate nor just. Great caution, therefore, should be taken by those who depend upon Archbishop Vigano to guide them in these matters. Be prudent. Be watchful. Make an investigation yourself. Don't be caught up in a scheme where "the blind are leading the blind." Jesus, Mary, and Joseph, pray for us, Prof. Aaron Milavec P.S.: At the Last Supper, Jesus said, "Take and eat. . . ." This implies that Jesus handed his disciples the Eucharist. They took it and ate (they chewed it). According to AV, he imagines that Jesus said, "Take this on your tongues while you are kneeling and let the Eucharist dissolve on your tongue without biting it. . . ." AV and his allies say: "The body of Jesus can only be received on the tongue and only from the consecrated hand of a priest. Amen." Such persons know nothing of the history of the Church. They imagine that the rubrics of their youth go all the way back to Jesus. What a mistake! It saddens me that an archbishop of my Church would peddle such nonsense. Receiving communion in the hand was the common practice of the Church in both East and West for the first 800 years of Christianity, and it was certainly considered reverent by the Fathers. In North Africa (including Egypt) the practice is mentioned by Tertullian,[1] Cyprian,[2] Augustine,[3] Cyril of Alexandria,[4] and John Climacus.[5] In Jerusalem, we have the mystagogical catecheses of Cyril of Jerusalem (or perhaps of his successor, John).[6] In Syria (what we now call Turkey and surrounding regions) it is witnessed by Basil the Great,[7] John Chrysostom,[8] Theodore of Mopsuestia,[9] John Damascene[10] and the Council of Constantinople in Trullo (also called the Quinisext council).[11] In East Syria (what we would now call the Middle East) we have evidence from Ephrem the Syrian[12] and Narsai.[13] In the far-flung regions of the empire-Gaul (modern-day France and Spain) we have the witness of Caesarius of Arles[14] and the council of Auxerre,[15] and in England, we have the Venerable Bede.[16] Liturgical evidence from Rome is always sparser than one would like, but Eusebius preserves a mention of communion in the hand in a letter written from Dionysius of Alexandria to Sixtus I, bishop of Rome,[17] and in a letter of Cornelius, bishop of Rome.[18] URL=
The Catechism of the Catholic Church, as published in its final and definitive form by Pope St John Paul II, is, essentially, sound. However, Cardinal Fernandez (as he now is) requested the Pope, some time ago, to alter the teaching on the death penalty, so that it now contradicts the teaching of the Sacred Scriptures, the Tradition of the Church and the Council of Trent. It was a very clever move, of course. Who would want to argue in favour of the death penalty? However, as the Pope explained to the Jesuits when he met them in Lisbon recently, the approach which he takes is that, if the Church, for two thousand years, was wrong in teaching the admissibility of the death penalty, it might just as easily have been wrong in other teachings, particularly in the area of sexual morality. The falsification of the Catechism in respect of the death penalty was the “thin end of the wedge” intended to open the way for the introduction of further, and more serious, falsification, in the future. Given the openly admitted approach of His Holiness in this respect, we do need to be on our guard. However, buying an original edition of the Catechism, as approved by Pope St. John Paul II, should be enough.
so “enlarging your tent” means to get rid of cardinals like burke and bishops like strickland and embrace a path of utilitarian synodality in keeping with a Hollerich and Martin idea of sexuality as “the church got it wrong on homosexuality”. no repentance or prayer required. love is love and this is the new fraternity. but get rid of those faithful distinguished prelates as they are not in the nee fraternity.. through their actions you will know their intentions.
I understand - personally I think the celibacy requirements and thinking are the strength of the position. - also the language is less polarising and as people are keen to trigger as an escape from life…..absence of triggering surely worth a mention. Francis is a tricky guy. Lovely interview sadly I wasnt in the loop here in Ireland but I expect our Monseigneur was Lets face it , whatever ones concerns about frantic Francis - homosexuality (for all genders) is hardly unknown in the Church and in the Jewish/Roman world of Christ and The Nazarene. Sin is sin and celibacy is celibacy - its not complicated and after thousands of years should have figured out something GIVEN ITS ‘PREVALENCE’ in the very Church its self. Blessing relationships of many natures, is an open issue - we Bless battleships and Soldiers at the doff of a cap - surely blessing efforts of human commitment comes easier to The Body of Christ than the hypocrisy of blessing the military accoutrement’s of tyranny and genocide Not all of this is worth getting frantic about or dying for. In Gods Name - 20,000 Palestinians, many Christians both Catholic & Orthodox and other denominations have been given their final solution by the demonic actions of ZionistSettler ideology - so wrongheaded that its going to bring disaster on the idea of Israel - the global rejection of zionism for a generation - exposing global Jewry to concern and sadly fear as well as crucifying 20,000 in Gaza. Soon the issue of "equity" will seem like a luxury if we arent very prayerful
The episcopal consecration also includes obedience and lotalty to Peter and the Magisterium. Schneider seems to lack understanding of the mind of Pooe Francis, who has never denied the Truths taiught by the Church. The listening to the people is about HEARING their worldly problems so as better to communicate the Truth to them. This bishop also may have a language problem. How are his Spanish and Italian. I see and hear no confusion from Rome. You have to listen carefully. +
*$2 million trade contract gotten our lord Jesus is my saviour. I was homeless, I had nothing to offer, always sleeping on the street, until Jesus sent me a friend who helped me... I got a job & was managing till I melt a friend who helped me introduce me to MR MARK HITCHINSON... Hechanged my life and now I have a home, a wife, a lovely daughter and a new identity... HALLELUJAH*
Wow I'm shocked you mentioned Mr Hutchinson’s services, I also trade with him and my family is happier than ever, I get to pay my son tuition fees and students loans.
God bless Pope Francis. He has introduced JESUS, as a human being, to the world. Nothing has changed. MERCY is what he wants the Clergy and laity to understand
I am Greek orthodox but love is an abused devalued word. Christ loves the woman taken in adultery. He loved the Samaritan woman at the well, but to all he said go and sin no more. Not that it does not matter what ever you do as long as it's love.
MERCY is 100% dispensed from the TOP of an extreme power gradient, to the vanquished. 2000+ of the most Holy have been shown a Peronist level of vindictive Mercilessness. By their fruits ... he has actually introduced Worldliness (Eartha) to human beings. JESUS introduced himself 2 millennia ago Deus Vult
It's very sad that some, like Schneider, have been driven into the weird world of the SSPX, anti Vatican II nuttiness and associated weirdness. In a way, you cannot blame them because Pope Francis is such a loon, but on the other hand, going overboard the opposite way is not the answer either. Schneider is a relatively minor figure who is only an AUXILIARY bishop. He does not even rise to the level of being given charge of a diocese, even in Kazakhstan. Plus, he is Austrian. So figure that one out. He constantly backs the SSPX and fruity notions that really do not hold up under scrutiny. It is extremely strange for a AUXILIARY bishop to issue his own Catechism, implying that the catechism of the Catholic church is not adequate. That is a level of hubris that no bishop should approach. On Larry Chapp's channel, he analyzes the sometimes critical errors Schneider includes in his "catechism". I admire Schneider's deep desire to keep the Catholic faith, but it is possible for Catholics to lose their minds and endanger souls by going to far off the deep end.
Agreed except for comment about Pope Francis (let's keep it charitable). As for Bishop Schneider, this type of action actually increases confusion rather than mitigate it.
The deep end is not to throw shade on the SSPX, who are the remnants of the faithful, but to acknowledge the mass (literally and figuratively) that has been FORCED upon the world is a sham.
Bishop Schneider to you. Show some respect. As to your preoccupation about whether he is prominent enough, Jesus was not prominent in His own time. In fact, when He was dying on the Cross most people considered Him a loser.
Larry Chapp is a fan of Balthasar who was under the influence of a medium who was under the influence of the angel appearing to Muhamnad under the name of Gabriel. Apokastasis is a form of apostasis. David's kingdom will be rebuilt, but the godless shall and will surely perish forever. Basically to say, the church has never condemned apokastasis, therefore you can hold to it, is fraudulent, for the exegesis you have to apply relies on assigning meaning to words they usually do not have at this time and context. For example: Second temple Judaism believed in only two aions: the first ending with the messiah, the second lasting forever. IfJesus tells his contemporaries, a sin will not be forgiven in this age to come, it means: it will never be forgiven, because the age is lasting forever. To argue with the fact of the second meaning of long age for aion is false, because it can not overrule the context of the first listeners, whose understanding is to be taken into account for true exegesis: what wanted Jesus tell the people in his time??
Hugely important discussion, vital context, and encouraging conclusion. It has been said, if the gates of hell cannot prevail against the church, how will the bishops? 'When the tyrant dies his reign is over. When the martyr dies his reign begins'.
drj0hnashfieId315
assuming y0u are n0t speaking metaph0ricaIIy can y0u teII me, are the gates 0f heII metaI ?
bearing in mind they need t0 be fire pr00f/retardant,
w00den 0nes is a n0 n0 0bvi0usIy
"it has been said" I0I
y0ur credibiIity as a thinker 0r a gr0wn up evap0rates and y0u exp0se y0urseIf as guIIibIe and creduI0us when y0u menti0n the idea heII has gates
are we aIs0 t0 assume the reign 0f the september 11 attackers began the sec0nd they hit the t0wers ?
pathetic
An incredible conversation that reminds me of the “old days” of traditional beliefs and clarity. Really, quite uplifting!!
It is so good to listen to you, Your Excellence. Clarity/Truth is so needed right now.
A wonderful interview with this great shepherd🙏
It was such a great encouragement to meet this wonderful Bishop in Dublin last week🙏
Thank God there are other Bishops standing up also but there need to be a lot more🙏
We must cling to the Cross and trust that this evil at the heart of our Church will pass🙏
Won’t pass. Unfortunately.
Oh how we need this hope especially in Germany where i live.
Greetings, Archbishop!
I entered The Church via RCIA from a fundamentalist background. I received your wonderful Catechism a few days ago and love it already! I had been saving a pretty leather journal ~ I’m always taking notes ~
My notes from your book are going in my lovely journal, I’m sure I will be referencing it as I continue on my path.
🙏🏻🕯️💜🕯️🙏🏻
Blessed Be ~~~
I Bid You Peace ~~~
Reading Bishop Schneider's book Credo. Excellent. Every Catholic family should have a copy. Will potentially make up for the lack of catechesis we have experienced in the last 60 years. Thank you!
Thank you Gavin. God bless you both 🙏
It gives a feeling of pleasure and strength to hear this message of hope from Bishop Schneider. Thank you!
Thank you so much for this Dr Ashenden. Really enjoyed your Thoughtful Questions!
Great observation: While great men give their lives for the truth, no man is willing to die for ambiguity.
Thank you so much Bishop Schneider for expounding the Truth.
Thanks to both of you for this discussion.
Good Bishop! Good show Thanks Drr. Ashenden
So very lovely and reassuring 🙏
I see an anchor of the Catholic faith - Thank You 👍
Two giants of The Remnant. Their contribution to Truth will be remembered
Two extraordinary men. Bless you both. Bless you Bishop Schneider I literally praid for a cathechism I could trust.
☀️💛I was encouraged by this video. Thank you.
A wonderful and encouraging interview with a great shepherd, whose voice we listen to, understand and follow! We were very happy to have His Grace Bishop Scneider in Croatia last year and with great joy we keep him in our prayers!
Papal ambiguity can cost the loss of souls. That is why we need a traditional pope in the See of St. Peter, to save souls by teaching with clarity.
thanks for the conversation
Interesting seeing these two classical men interact.
Great 👍 thank you
Great question related to VII. When you divert from the core elements of the fath, it will not end well. It only takes one drop of poison to make a glass of water unfit to drink.
Thank God Pope Francis can recognize love in any situation and desires to bless love.
Thank You!
"...and this is the beautiful sign that the church is divine that we are one body and this church is ultimately indestructible..."
I live in Sydney Australia and it therefor follows , that I must apparently wait until March next year (2024) for for this much anticipated book to arrive ? Thank you both for bringing this conversation to the public square and may God continue to bless you both.
Thank you but for me it has not been so straight forward...My address keeps " rearranging " its self on their system ?
I have contacted them but so far they have not replied..@@Knight-s2o
Not so straight forward here in Sydney ( trust me ) .@@Knight-s2o
Move to Melbourne, perhaps? Dame Edna rated it as the cultural and academic centre of Australia.
Dear Dr. Gavin ... next time please ask for a blessing Lovely interview
I met the Bishop after Mass and only asked him for a blessing, you're correct.
Basic and Direct
Thank you.
TRUTH will set you free! Ambiguity, as Pope Francis is practicing, leads chaos and darkness.
Amen
The true Remnant is known to God and is drawn from every culture, every denomination and every place on Earth.
Syncretism. Heresy.
There has been a dramatic decline in standards of sexual morality in the World over the last fifty years. I can remember Princess Margaret coming on the wireless and announcing to the nation that, mindful of the teaching of the Christian Church, she would not be marrying Group Captain Peter Townsend. Now, in the Sunday Times this week end, we have an article by those who, while married, have agreed with their husband or wife that they might sleep with other people. I am pleased to say, though, that the response of most people in the comments section underneath to this sort of arrangement was “yuk” or words to that effect.
Thank God Gavin is catholic
….and not only that, he is also now a Catholic with a big “C”.
This conversation leaves out the reality of purposeful, malicious infiltration of Church governing bodies and living magisterium by her enemies. Who concretely are these people and/or organizations, what mechanisms are they using and what is their goal?
Modernists at Vatican II. I highly recommend the books "The Rhine Flows Into the Tiber" and "Iota Unum."
@@littlerock5256 thanks! Keep fighting…
Dr Ashenden have you read Dr E Michael Jones’s book “Libido Dominandi: Sexual Liberation and Political Control.” The term is taken from Book 1 of St Augustine’s City of God. His book is the history of the sexual revolution from 1773 to the present. LD shows how sexual revolution was from its inception a form of control. From the book, “Those who wished to liberate man from the moral order needed to impose social controls as soon as they succeeded because liberated libido led inevitably to anarchy.”
yes
We already have a Catechism of the Catholic Church
@@Mi-bi6ezexactly, so people want to follow the right one
And that catechism is deficient and contains many ambiguities. In catechesis I have always used either that of Trent or Baltimore. I will now be adding the Athanasian Catechism to my priestly work.
Great
Gavin Ashenden says that anybody who cares for the Church as an institution would elect aa a Pope somebody who exemplifies the strongest things in the faith. You would think that that would be the case. You would hope that that would be the case. Yet many (most?) of the Cardinals appointed by Pope Francis do not seem to do so. So the question has to be asked; to what extent do they care even for the continuation and thriving of the Catholic Church as an institution? A further possibility is that the Cardinals will elect a Francis Mark II, thinking that they are electing a very different kind of Pope. How many of the Cardinals who voted for Jorge Bergoglio really understand what they were voting for? Francis has been very careful to avoid the Cardinals getting to know each other well. Furthermore, the next Pope could be someone who speaks clearly and avoids confusion but his clarity is the clarity of the ‘progressive’ agenda. That is probably Francis’s hope.
They don't care. If anything, the cardinals and Francis are working to subvert the faith. But this began at Vatican II.
Why do we need another Catechism when we already have the Catechism of the Catholic Church
Is this Catechim complied by Bishop Schneider complementary to the Catechism of the Catholic Church? I would be much obliged and grateful if the Bishop can provide an answer
and maybe the secretary of state Parolin will be on the block next 😂😂😂😂
Has anyone read his book ?
Should be excellency shouldn't it? Eminence is for a cardinal or so I thought
These forms of address are complicated. For example, in Court, a High Court Judge is always “My Lord” but it would be great social faux pas to address him in private otherwise than simply as “Judge”. Similarly, while at the most formal level, a Duke is still “Your Grace”, once again, in a social setting, he would, only ever by addressed as “My Lord” and more usually, simply as “Duke”. For anyone who knows a Bishop reasonably well, he would address him simply as “Bishop”.
It is interesting, as you say, that Cardinal Parolin was able to send his letter to the German Bishops. It is not within his remit. As Cardinal Secretary of State, he is responsible for the foreign affairs of the Vatican City State and, in a general way, of the Apostolic See. He is not responsible for matters of doctrine or discipline within the Church. In sending a letter which, clearly, Cardinal Fernandez, as Prefect of the Holy Office, should have sent, he is, perhaps, sending a message to the whole Church and to the other Cardinals, in particular. Don’t vote for Cardinal Fernandez at the coming Conclave. He can no more be relied upon to uphold the doctrine of the Faith than Pope Francis. What is surprising is that his letter must have been authorised by the Pope - he would not have dared to send it on his own responsibility alone. Or, possibly, the Pope did know that he was about to send the letter and gave an ambiguous response to Cardinal Parolin’s request for approval, which he can, eventually, if it suits him, deny, using lack of authority for the letter as an excuse to remove Cardinal Parolin.
Thank you. That’s a very helpful contribution.
If you don't "rely" on the Pope to uphold Catholic doctrine, I don't see how you can consider yourself a faithful Catholic.
Thank you very much for this video, I have just one question: in which sense do you think the 2nd Vatican Council was ambiguous? I mean, could you be more precise with regard to specific texts or expressions? Thank you again!
Yes, I would love to hear the answer to your question. It is the very same question that came to my mind.
This is a 26 minute interview not a lecture series!
Such a statement, made by a bishop in public, is a very serious thing, regardless of whether it is a lecture or not, and can do much good or much harm to the Church. As a catholic, I love and protect the Church
This is easy to find with a search. Many have outlined the errors and ambiguity of Vatican II.
As you probably know, one of the works of mercy is to teach the unlearned. I would be very grateful for any references @@littlerock5256 , I would really appreciate, thank you!
My husband was a broadcaster and in his profession they had a saying “ keep it simple stupid” I am not being rude please , but read the Bible for yourself, Preferably the New Testament and I would recommend you start by reading the Gospel
of of Matthew and then the Gospel of John
If you are encouraged and being blessed with your eyes being opened go the The Acts of the Apostles,
The Apostle Paul gave an excellent account of the works of the Early Church ,
Jesus said “
If you seek me with ALL YOUR HEART YOU WILL FIND ME, Trust in the Lord with ALL YOUR HEART ACKNOWLEDGE HIM IN ALL YOUR WAYS ABD He will direct your Path, men can confirm the Truth to you, BUT JESUS IS THE Truth ✝️He said I AM THE WAY THE TRUTH AND THE LIFE
NO MAN COMES TO THE FATHER but through ME
AMEN. kris ETHIOPIA
“226. Then human dignity is not the same in all persons? No. The human person loses his dignity in proportion to his free choice of error or evil; e.g., the dignity of Adolph Hitler and St. Francis of Assisi are not the same.”
Weird circular reference to Hitler.
Faith comes by hearing the Word of God as written in the Bible and nothing else other than that!
Read Romans Chapter one it warns of the sin of marriage other than between a man and a woman , complicating it is twisting the TRUTH as written in the Bible,read also Johns Gospel chapter three IF YOU ARE TRULY SEEKING Truth ✝️
I am told that Schneider changed the definition of schism in his catechism. How can he do that?
Are you twisted?@ littlerock.
@@CC-cr1oz It is Schneider who has twisted the definition of a schismatic.
According to Canon Law and Attwater's Catholic Dictionary, a schismatic is one who refuses to submit to the authority of the pope.
Schneider changed it to those who refuse to recognize the Supreme Pontiff.
At least we have evolved their use to be a lot of bloodletting historically so yes and no not so bad now only feelings are hurt now
if you become so popular to catholic people you may be dismissed by the pope dear bishop as this papacy does not like to have any sort of person making statements concerning their deviant views of the deposit of faith.
Most modern Bishops like an easy life - the Pope might find it difficult to persuade any of them to go to Kazakhstan to be an auxiliary Bishop there.
Let’s examine the public record of Archbishop Vigano relative to the actions of Pope Francis:
Accusation #1 by Archbishop Vigano [abbr.=AV]: The so-called “church” of Bergoglio does not hesitate to close churches, arrogating to itself the wicked right to deny God public worship and to deprive the faithful of the grace of the Sacraments through a wretched connivance with civil power. AV, to begin with, refuses to recognize that "Bergoglio" [the pope's family name] has been legitimately elected by the College of Cardinals. His official title is "Pope Francis." AV, consequently, is disrespectful and arrogant in not recognizing the office that he holds in the RCC.
#2 AV accuses Pope Francis of "deny[ing] God public worship" and of "depriv[ing] the faithful of the grace of the Sacraments." What AV fails to tell us is that Pope Francis has, after due consultation, closed the churches of Vatican City temporarily in order to prevent further transmission of the coronavirus. Hence, there is neither "arrogance" or "wickedness" involved. On the contrary, it would be "wicked" and "irresponsible" NOT to take prudent measures to safeguard human lives. We are living in the time of a pandemic-a fact that AV wants to avoid. For more details, see www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-italy-rome-churche/rome-catholic-churches-ordered-closed-due-to-coronavirus-unprecedented-in-modern-times-idUSKBN20Z3BU
Accusation #3 by AV: Pope Francis "tampers with the sublime and inviolable words of the Prayer which the Lord Himself taught us." AV fails to note that the "sublime and inviolable words" are written in Greek and that the New Testament has two very distinctive versions of the Lord's Prayer. The contemporary Our Father comes from a translation of the longer Greek version found in Matt 6:9-13.
#4 AV also fails to tell us that the Church, as a faithful interpreter and transmitter of Christ, needs to create suitable translations into modern languages (e.g. Italian) in order to enable the faithful to pray in words they understand and in words that do not give them wrong ideas. Here are the facts of the case:
Pope Francis has risked the wrath of traditionalists by approving a change to the wording of the Lord's Prayer. Instead of saying “lead us not into temptation”, it will say “do not let us fall into temptation”. The new wording was approved by the general assembly of the Episcopal Conference of Italy last month [Jun 6, 2019]. The new wording, it has to be assumed, is in modern Italian, and the changes apply only to the churches of Italy.
Pope Francis, in collaboration with biblical and linguistic experts, changed the phrase "lead us not into temptation" to "do not let us fall into temptation," as mentioned in the gospel of Matthew 6:13, because the original translation implies that God induces temptation. The change, officials said, is closer to the original intent of the prayer. All in all, Archbishop Vigano shows himself to be incapable of fairly interpreting Pope Francis. Judging from just these four accusations, the reader can see that Archbishop Vigano clearly has no sympathy for Pope Francis and his prejudice leads him to make judgments that are neither accurate nor just.
Great caution, therefore, should be taken by those who depend upon Archbishop Vigano to guide them in these matters. Be prudent. Be watchful. Make an investigation yourself. Don't be caught up in a scheme where "the blind are leading the blind."
Jesus, Mary, and Joseph, pray for us,
Prof. Aaron Milavec
P.S.: At the Last Supper, Jesus said, "Take and eat. . . ." This implies that Jesus handed his disciples the Eucharist. They took it and ate (they chewed it). According to AV, he imagines that Jesus said, "Take this on your tongues while you are kneeling and let the Eucharist dissolve on your tongue without biting it. . . ."
AV and his allies say: "The body of Jesus can only be received on the tongue and only from the consecrated hand of a priest. Amen." Such persons know nothing of the history of the Church. They imagine that the rubrics of their youth go all the way back to Jesus. What a mistake! It saddens me that an archbishop of my Church would peddle such nonsense.
Receiving communion in the hand was the common practice of the Church in both East and West for the first 800 years of Christianity, and it was certainly considered reverent by the Fathers.
In North Africa (including Egypt) the practice is mentioned by Tertullian,[1] Cyprian,[2] Augustine,[3] Cyril of Alexandria,[4] and John Climacus.[5] In Jerusalem, we have the mystagogical catecheses of Cyril of Jerusalem (or perhaps of his successor, John).[6] In Syria (what we now call Turkey and surrounding regions) it is witnessed by Basil the Great,[7] John Chrysostom,[8] Theodore of Mopsuestia,[9] John Damascene[10] and the Council of Constantinople in Trullo (also called the Quinisext council).[11] In East Syria (what we would now call the Middle East) we have evidence from Ephrem the Syrian[12] and Narsai.[13] In the far-flung regions of the empire-Gaul (modern-day France and Spain) we have the witness of Caesarius of Arles[14] and the council of Auxerre,[15] and in England, we have the Venerable Bede.[16] Liturgical evidence from Rome is always sparser than one would like, but Eusebius preserves a mention of communion in the hand in a letter written from Dionysius of Alexandria to Sixtus I, bishop of Rome,[17] and in a letter of Cornelius, bishop of Rome.[18] URL=
What about the Catechism of the Catholic Church John Paul II?
Is not this catechism used by you ??
The Catechism of the Catholic Church, as published in its final and definitive form by Pope St John Paul II, is, essentially, sound. However, Cardinal Fernandez (as he now is) requested the Pope, some time ago, to alter the teaching on the death penalty, so that it now contradicts the teaching of the Sacred Scriptures, the Tradition of the Church and the Council of Trent. It was a very clever move, of course. Who would want to argue in favour of the death penalty? However, as the Pope explained to the Jesuits when he met them in Lisbon recently, the approach which he takes is that, if the Church, for two thousand years, was wrong in teaching the admissibility of the death penalty, it might just as easily have been wrong in other teachings, particularly in the area of sexual morality. The falsification of the Catechism in respect of the death penalty was the “thin end of the wedge” intended to open the way for the introduction of further, and more serious, falsification, in the future. Given the openly admitted approach of His Holiness in this respect, we do need to be on our guard. However, buying an original edition of the Catechism, as approved by Pope St. John Paul II, should be enough.
@@Mark3ABEvery good answer 👍🙏😇
so “enlarging your tent” means to get rid of cardinals like burke and bishops like strickland and embrace a path of utilitarian synodality in keeping with a Hollerich and Martin idea of sexuality as “the church got it wrong on homosexuality”. no repentance or prayer required. love is love and this is the new fraternity. but get rid of those faithful distinguished prelates as they are not in the nee fraternity.. through their actions you will know their intentions.
I understand - personally I think the celibacy requirements and thinking are the strength of the position. - also the language is less polarising and as people are keen to trigger as an escape from life…..absence of triggering surely worth a mention. Francis is a tricky guy.
Lovely interview sadly I wasnt in the loop here in Ireland but I expect our Monseigneur was
Lets face it , whatever ones concerns about frantic Francis - homosexuality (for all genders) is hardly unknown in the Church and
in the Jewish/Roman world of Christ and The Nazarene. Sin is sin and celibacy is celibacy - its not complicated and after thousands of years should have figured out something GIVEN ITS ‘PREVALENCE’ in the very Church its self.
Blessing relationships of many natures, is an open issue - we Bless battleships and Soldiers at the doff of a cap - surely blessing efforts of human commitment comes easier to The Body of Christ than the hypocrisy of blessing the military accoutrement’s of tyranny and genocide
Not all of this is worth getting frantic about or dying for.
In Gods Name - 20,000 Palestinians, many Christians both Catholic & Orthodox and other denominations have been given their final solution by the demonic actions of ZionistSettler ideology - so wrongheaded that its going to bring disaster on the idea of Israel - the global rejection of zionism for a generation - exposing global Jewry to concern and sadly fear as well as crucifying 20,000 in Gaza.
Soon the issue of "equity" will seem like a luxury if we arent very prayerful
Bishops are Excellency, not Eminence.
Vatican 1 are not all saints . The nuns where horrible my mother said. Not much love in abiedence.
The episcopal consecration also includes obedience and lotalty to Peter and the Magisterium. Schneider seems to lack understanding of the mind of Pooe Francis, who has never denied the Truths taiught by the Church. The listening to the people is about HEARING their worldly problems so as better to communicate the Truth to them. This bishop also may have a language problem. How are his Spanish and Italian. I see and hear no confusion from Rome. You have to listen carefully. +
Pooe Francis?
Francis has publicly been accused of heresy a number of times, by those in the post Vatican II church.
You are very greatly deluded I am sorry to say.
Francis? A false teacher, sitting as an imposter in the Chair of Peter, spouting heresy.
One of The Truth of The Roman Catholic Church. Outside of The Church there is no Salvation.
*$2 million trade contract gotten our lord Jesus is my saviour. I was homeless, I had nothing to offer, always sleeping on the street, until Jesus sent me a friend who helped me... I got a job & was managing till I melt a friend who helped me introduce me to MR MARK HITCHINSON... Hechanged my life and now I have a home, a wife, a lovely daughter and a new identity... HALLELUJAH*
*Mr Mark Hitchinson trading services changed my Life, I and his trading services have come a long way investing and cashing out weekly*
Wow I'm shocked you mentioned Mr Hutchinson’s services, I also trade with him and my family is happier than ever, I get to pay my son tuition fees and students loans.
My neighbour also trade with him and mr Mark Hutchinson services helped him pay his rent and utilities including his family loans.
Can you aid me on how to connect with him??🙏
👇🏻
God bless Pope Francis. He has introduced JESUS, as a human being, to the world. Nothing has changed. MERCY is what he wants the Clergy and laity to understand
His mercy is very selective.
With all due respect your 1st 2 sentences cancel each other out absolutely.
I am Greek orthodox but love is an abused devalued word. Christ loves the woman taken in adultery. He loved the Samaritan woman at the well, but to all he said go and sin no more. Not that it does not matter what ever you do as long as it's love.
You are severly deluded if you really believe that!
MERCY is 100% dispensed from the TOP of an extreme power gradient, to the vanquished.
2000+ of the most Holy have been shown a Peronist level of vindictive Mercilessness.
By their fruits ...
he has actually introduced Worldliness (Eartha) to human beings.
JESUS introduced himself 2 millennia ago
Deus Vult
It's very sad that some, like Schneider, have been driven into the weird world of the SSPX, anti Vatican II nuttiness and associated weirdness. In a way, you cannot blame them because Pope Francis is such a loon, but on the other hand, going overboard the opposite way is not the answer either. Schneider is a relatively minor figure who is only an AUXILIARY bishop. He does not even rise to the level of being given charge of a diocese, even in Kazakhstan. Plus, he is Austrian. So figure that one out. He constantly backs the SSPX and fruity notions that really do not hold up under scrutiny. It is extremely strange for a AUXILIARY bishop to issue his own Catechism, implying that the catechism of the Catholic church is not adequate. That is a level of hubris that no bishop should approach. On Larry Chapp's channel, he analyzes the sometimes critical errors Schneider includes in his "catechism". I admire Schneider's deep desire to keep the Catholic faith, but it is possible for Catholics to lose their minds and endanger souls by going to far off the deep end.
Agreed except for comment about Pope Francis (let's keep it charitable). As for Bishop Schneider, this type of action actually increases confusion rather than mitigate it.
The deep end is not to throw shade on the SSPX, who are the remnants of the faithful, but to acknowledge the mass (literally and figuratively) that has been FORCED upon the world is a sham.
Bishop Schneider to you. Show some respect.
As to your preoccupation about whether he is prominent enough, Jesus was not prominent in His own time. In fact, when He was dying on the Cross most people considered Him a loser.
Larry Chapp is a fan of Balthasar who was under the influence of a medium who was under the influence of the angel appearing to Muhamnad under the name of Gabriel. Apokastasis is a form of apostasis. David's kingdom will be rebuilt, but the godless shall and will surely perish forever. Basically to say, the church has never condemned apokastasis, therefore you can hold to it, is fraudulent, for the exegesis you have to apply relies on assigning meaning to words they usually do not have at this time and context. For example: Second temple Judaism believed in only two aions: the first ending with the messiah, the second lasting forever. IfJesus tells his contemporaries, a sin will not be forgiven in this age to come, it means: it will never be forgiven, because the age is lasting forever. To argue with the fact of the second meaning of long age for aion is false, because it can not overrule the context of the first listeners, whose understanding is to be taken into account for true exegesis: what wanted Jesus tell the people in his time??
@@--Mar i was going to say the same. Very disrespectful.
Schneider? Really? This channel has sunk to new depths.
Bishop Athanasius Schneider? This channel has risen to new heights!
He is such a holy man.
@@Mark3ABE Bishop Athanasius Schneider. Let's not confer on him honors he doesn't have, but yes, he's a great asset to the channel, God bless him.
@annawild7117
No. Just another
Latin Mess ponce.
@@dwpjoyceHe seems learned enough to be an Archbishop, however, as you point out, he isn’t.