DR2.0 looks, sounds and plays better. The fact that they havent even managed to straight port it to the new engine, with equal looks/sounds/features is a real shame. Yes the stages are better, but its really at the cost of everything else. Was it worth it?
What about the missing Telemetry/VR, The downgraded sounds, The terrible rain and snow effects, the terrible AI. It's certainly not the best blend of WRC and DR features that fans wanted@@Luebke2773
I was shocked when I realised how small your chanel is. The quality is amazing! You deserve way more then 1.5k subs and 100 views. Great video and I really enjoyed it!
PS5 too. This game is kind of a mess right now, but hopefully they will get it fixed with some updates. And it definitely doesn’t look next gen. Somewhat disappointed to be perfectly honest.
things just seem "flatter" in WRC generations. probably because they moved EVERYTHING to a new game engine and havent figured out how to get everything looking the right way like they have with Dirt Rally 2.0. I hope they get everything sorted out in the next art pass (i.e., reflective plastics, light bouncing inside the car, texture bumpiness, etc.)
Sorry but the first thing... Why codemasters had made wrc with the unreal4 engine and not with the unreal5?! And i really think that the codemasters "house-engine" EGO made a really better job in DR2.0... WRC actually don't looks like a finished developer job... It's not a round package, i think... Hope they fix it a little bit more in direction like DIRT RALLY 2.0...
I read in a comment section that Unreal Engine 5 was not released yet when they started developing this game so that is why it is in UE4. I also saw someone comment that the reason for the enige switch was that thier own engine was aleeady at it's limits with Dirt Rally 2. I am still dissapointed as well tho.
For some reason, I can't hear the gravel hiting the floor of the car when playing using the chase cam on the new WRC on Series X. It's only audible if I turn the engine sound way down, which I'm not going to do.
Trees and grass looks so fake and dead in the WRC. That’s a real shame, that they had to leave EGO and switch to UE4. Wonder why they didn’t go with UE5 if it was already available
@@pascalrofeldt7571 People wouldnt have been complaining if the graphics were on PAR. But instead we get a game that came out what, 5 years later? and looks far worse, while running EVEN WORSE than dirt rally 2.
I don't understand the hype around EA WRC. It looks like any other WRC to me and the handling looks slightly better than V Rally. EA has been paying influencers off left and right for this one.
Bingo. The hype was beyond crazy, huge sim racers who are normally very critical, gave this game a full pass with all sort of issues both performance and handling.
That's how it works. The big companies buy successful IPs. Then they push out half finished games as quickly as possible and give them huge marketing budgets. People preorder and buy at release because everyone online talks positively only to realize they bought an beta or even alpha for full price.
It's not better or equal to DR2. It has the stages and cars I wanted for the dirt series... just in an EA arcade rally racer with graphics to suit one... lighting is bad and DR2 was manageable with a controller, the roads in WRC don't allow a natural feeling drif... it's just not a next gen dirt quality game it's an EA game.
How you gonna so a sound comparison video with no track side shots?? The audio reflections, reverb, and echoes are what makes Dirt Rally unbeatable in the audio dept but you cant hear them from the chase cam (just like real life).
@@pascalrofeldt7571 Yes, it is. Miles better. Unless you enjoy screen tearing, frame skips, bland textures, horrid scenery pop-ups... Try to watch a TV cam replay to realize cars move like shopping carts. No sense of speed or momentum, just a clunky box with a car skin moving around the tracks.
wrc interior sounds are better, dirt exterior sounds are better, dirt has far better graphics, wrc has far better maps. wrc has better handling for tarmac, idk which wins for dirt/gravel surfaces opinions seem mixed. wrc has better campaign. Was really looking forward too this game, and will still prob pick it up at some point but really sucks that the visuals are not up to par. Graphics matter to me and graphics degradation from a newer released title is doubly bad. Maybe not 100% fair in this case since it's not technically dirt rally 3 but as far as i'm concerned it should be treated as such.
It's kinda weird that some wrc stages actually have better graphics than DR2, but there are more stages with bad graphics than with good graphics. Some stages in this WRC look like old dirt 3 graphics. The cars also have greater detail in WRC than DR2. I think the game released with many stages not fully finished graphics-wise because of some stupidly short deadlines EA gave the devs. For example look at this stage at 15:31 vs this at 16:45. The difference in graphics is like 2023 vs 2015
wrc italy looks really good while mexico looks like it could be in dirt rally 1 also while stages are better in wrc the actual road surfaces are far too smooth making the game feel quite arcadey and easier to drive
I actually re-installed WRC Generations again last night. I did a one on one comparison on PS5 and WRC looks significantly better. BUT…..not better than DIRT Rally 2.0!!!!! WRC is apperently next gen only. It looks worse than a previous incarnation on lesser hardware on a previous generation though. Dirt Rally 2.0 to Dirt Rally was even a large graphical step forward in the same generation. This is a five year development cycle and new, much improved hardware and it looks inferior in many ways. What bothers me even more is that I find the track layouts uninspiring, barren, boring and generic. For instance Monte Carlo is almost a.i. generated like it is done with the trackbuilder in Dirt5. The uphill righthand corners keep repeating themselves in exactly the same way. It is like driving the same road for 17 km’s. Trackside details, elevation (like the Turkey track in Kileton’s efforts) etc. are all substantially lesser implemented than in Generations and even Codemasters’ own Dirt Rally 2.0.
They had it spot on in the first Dirt Rally all they had to do was work on the aero physics 2.0 wasn’t that good imo. The cars were too floaty, they were like a bar of soap in a wet sink
I have this exact feeling. Dirt 1 was a masterpiece, but something was off in Dirt 2.0. For me, even ea wrc is more enjoyable tha dirt 2.0, even being more arcade.
@@ThisVersusThat Yeah, I know, but it isn't easy to access on some platforms, especially phones. Even on a PC, I'm constantly hovering my mouse over the progress bar to see the time stamps. Just include some captions, bro. Or maybe you want to stay a small channel.
@@ThisVersusThat It's not funny. I'm giving you constructive feedback on how you can streamline your product and improve your channel. The first rule in business is not to disparage your customers. If you plan on being a serious content creator, perhaps you could consider rising above the banter and taking responsibility for any potential flaws associated with your brand. A successful business strategy relies on monitoring and responding positively to public reception of a product. A skill issue? Sure, I can keep tapping my phone or smart TV remote every few seconds so the TH-cam progress bar appears, allowing me to view the time stamps, but what if I want to sit back and watch the video without distractions and constant interaction with the device? People just want to watch videos and enjoy the full-screen experience without complications. I'm supposed to be a viewer, not a participant. I also don't want to see TH-cam overlays when critically analyzing graphic fidelity. I'd much prefer your polished editing skills displaying onscreen logos instead. Many other videos compare the same thing, but are presented in more professional formats. Please provide any reasons you may have to explain why I should continue supporting your channel, given the current state of your content, and your condescending attitude towards your fan base.
Someone found chat gpt😭 Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback. I genuinely appreciate your insights and understand your concerns about the viewing experience and the quality of my content. Firstly, I apologize if any previous interactions came across as dismissive. It was not my intention to disparage anyone. I value each and every one of my viewers and their input is crucial for the growth and improvement of this channel. Regarding your specific points: Viewing Experience: I understand the frustration with needing to interact frequently to see time stamps. I'm exploring ways to improve this, such as including more visible on-screen cues during key moments in the videos to help with navigation without disrupting the viewing experience. Full-Screen Experience: Your point about the importance of an uninterrupted full-screen experience is well taken. I'll look into minimizing unnecessary overlays and finding better ways to present information cleanly and professionally. Content Presentation: I am continuously working on refining my editing skills and the overall presentation of my videos. Your suggestion to include polished on-screen logos and a more professional format is something I will prioritize moving forward. The whole video has a format: first EA WRC, then Dirt Rally a normal person would notice that. I have used captions in some of my older videos, as seen here: th-cam.com/video/CXgkAnsXqGQ/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/tkqhDYkWtBU/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/ALTW_Aul4iI/w-d-xo.html I chose not to include captions in this particular video, but I can certainly add them in the future to help everyone stay on track. Here's how much of a constructive feedback you gave me. Comment 1: "Thanks for telling us which one is which.🙄" Issues: Sarcasm and Disrespect: The sarcastic tone and eye-rolling emoji indicate frustration but do not provide clear, actionable feedback. Lack of Specificity: The comment doesn’t specify what the issue is or how it could be resolved. Comment 2: "Yeah, I know, but it isn't easy to access on some platforms, especially phones. Even on a PC, I'm constantly hovering my mouse over the progress bar to see the time stamps. Just include some captions, bro. Or maybe you want to stay a small channel. Issues: Disrespectful Tone: Phrases like "Just include some captions, bro" and "Or maybe you want to stay a small channel" come off as condescending and dismissive. Negative Assumptions: The comment assumes the creator is either lazy or uninterested in growing their channel, which is unhelpful and demotivating. Vague Solution: While the comment does mention captions, it lacks detailed suggestions on how to implement them effectively. Why These Comments Aren’t Constructive: Negative Tone: Both comments use sarcasm and condescension, which can be discouraging rather than helpful. Lack of Specificity: Constructive feedback should be clear and specific about what the issue is and how it can be improved. Absence of Encouragement: Constructive feedback should balance criticism with positive reinforcement to motivate improvement. And yes this is funny.
![[Watch Party] RoV Pro League 2024 Winter | with Moowan ( Bacon Time Vs Talon )](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/CCEDhu6dPN8/mqdefault.jpg)
DR2.0 looks, sounds and plays better. The fact that they havent even managed to straight port it to the new engine, with equal looks/sounds/features is a real shame. Yes the stages are better, but its really at the cost of everything else. Was it worth it?
Yes, it was. Stages are much better. Not as good as in generations, but better. Dirt 2.0 was really bad handlingwise. Way to fast gameplay.
What about the missing Telemetry/VR, The downgraded sounds, The terrible rain and snow effects, the terrible AI. It's certainly not the best blend of WRC and DR features that fans wanted@@Luebke2773
it....doesn't.
@@Luebke2773for me they're actually more fun than in generations. Generations had some stages that were unnecessarily hard and insanely dangerous
Interior sounds are more realistic now
I was shocked when I realised how small your chanel is. The quality is amazing! You deserve way more then 1.5k subs and 100 views. Great video and I really enjoyed it!
And my favorite is def Dirt Rally.
Thanks for your kind words.
The screen tearing on the Series X Is crazy in WRC 🥹
PS5 too. This game is kind of a mess right now, but hopefully they will get it fixed with some updates. And it definitely doesn’t look next gen. Somewhat disappointed to be perfectly honest.
So glad I didn’t pre order and still lovin dirt 2
new WRC looks like game from ps3
you mean from PS2 lol 😂 😂
The problem is not the game, is youre eyes.
@@gamixccc5117 are you sure? i see both and in my opinion dirt 2.0 graphics looks way ahead wrc
@@gamixccc5117buhahaha..... go and play Dirt 2 on wet and ea wrc in wet and come back to me..... yoooo
Please look up how bad games looked in 2009
things just seem "flatter" in WRC generations. probably because they moved EVERYTHING to a new game engine and havent figured out how to get everything looking the right way like they have with Dirt Rally 2.0. I hope they get everything sorted out in the next art pass (i.e., reflective plastics, light bouncing inside the car, texture bumpiness, etc.)
this isn't wrc generations
@@ph-fi7qo i have no idea how i managed to type that and not notice
Sorry but the first thing... Why codemasters had made wrc with the unreal4 engine and not with the unreal5?!
And i really think that the codemasters "house-engine" EGO made a really better job in DR2.0...
WRC actually don't looks like a finished developer job... It's not a round package, i think...
Hope they fix it a little bit more in direction like DIRT RALLY 2.0...
I read in a comment section that Unreal Engine 5 was not released yet when they started developing this game so that is why it is in UE4. I also saw someone comment that the reason for the enige switch was that thier own engine was aleeady at it's limits with Dirt Rally 2. I am still dissapointed as well tho.
Old engine was not enough for longer stages as the new one from Chile (30kms)
For some reason, I can't hear the gravel hiting the floor of the car when playing using the chase cam on the new WRC on Series X. It's only audible if I turn the engine sound way down, which I'm not going to do.
Trees and grass looks so fake and dead in the WRC. That’s a real shame, that they had to leave EGO and switch to UE4. Wonder why they didn’t go with UE5 if it was already available
Who cares while driving? Its a rally game, man. But yeah, go look for bad graphics when you crash
@@pascalrofeldt7571 People wouldnt have been complaining if the graphics were on PAR. But instead we get a game that came out what, 5 years later? and looks far worse, while running EVEN WORSE than dirt rally 2.
@@fennex7575 people complained about the physics after seeing a 4 second teaser.
Whats bad exceptfor flat bushes you only see when you crash? :D
@@pascalrofeldt7571Particles, foliage density, overall textures quality, object diversity. It looks like Ps3 game
@@xen1465 which ps3 game?
I don't understand the hype around EA WRC. It looks like any other WRC to me and the handling looks slightly better than V Rally. EA has been paying influencers off left and right for this one.
Bingo. The hype was beyond crazy, huge sim racers who are normally very critical, gave this game a full pass with all sort of issues both performance and handling.
Whats wrong with the handling?
That's how it works. The big companies buy successful IPs. Then they push out half finished games as quickly as possible and give them huge marketing budgets. People preorder and buy at release because everyone online talks positively only to realize they bought an beta or even alpha for full price.
It's not better or equal to DR2. It has the stages and cars I wanted for the dirt series... just in an EA arcade rally racer with graphics to suit one... lighting is bad and DR2 was manageable with a controller, the roads in WRC don't allow a natural feeling drif... it's just not a next gen dirt quality game it's an EA game.
GT4 on PS2 ! How are things not WAY better two generations later.
How you gonna so a sound comparison video with no track side shots?? The audio reflections, reverb, and echoes are what makes Dirt Rally unbeatable in the audio dept but you cant hear them from the chase cam (just like real life).
The sense of speed in Dirt 2.0 ist better
No its not
@@pascalrofeldt7571
Yes, it is. Miles better.
Unless you enjoy screen tearing, frame skips, bland textures, horrid scenery pop-ups... Try to watch a TV cam replay to realize cars move like shopping carts. No sense of speed or momentum, just a clunky box with a car skin moving around the tracks.
So they spent 4 years to develope a game that looks the same as the older one but requires 5 times more powerfull hardware.
Si pero las etapas duran un 25% más...
You need to be talented to achieve something like that 🤣🤣🤣
@@Protato666 cuando quieras pruebas mi talento...en que plataforma juegas....
Eh ?@@rodrigoperezserrano9595
Gotta sell those GPUs!!!!!
Dirt rally 2.0 still slightly better sound wise, and noticeably better in graphics.
Whats better about the graphics?
wrc interior sounds are better, dirt exterior sounds are better, dirt has far better graphics, wrc has far better maps. wrc has better handling for tarmac, idk which wins for dirt/gravel surfaces opinions seem mixed. wrc has better campaign.
Was really looking forward too this game, and will still prob pick it up at some point but really sucks that the visuals are not up to par. Graphics matter to me and graphics degradation from a newer released title is doubly bad. Maybe not 100% fair in this case since it's not technically dirt rally 3 but as far as i'm concerned it should be treated as such.
It's kinda weird that some wrc stages actually have better graphics than DR2, but there are more stages with bad graphics than with good graphics. Some stages in this WRC look like old dirt 3 graphics.
The cars also have greater detail in WRC than DR2.
I think the game released with many stages not fully finished graphics-wise because of some stupidly short deadlines EA gave the devs.
For example look at this stage at 15:31 vs this at 16:45. The difference in graphics is like 2023 vs 2015
wrc italy looks really good while mexico looks like it could be in dirt rally 1 also while stages are better in wrc the actual road surfaces are far too smooth making the game feel quite arcadey and easier to drive
Awesome 2.0 Absolute 🥰🥰🥰
I actually re-installed WRC Generations again last night.
I did a one on one comparison on PS5 and WRC looks significantly better. BUT…..not better than DIRT Rally 2.0!!!!!
WRC is apperently next gen only. It looks worse than a previous incarnation on lesser hardware on a previous generation though.
Dirt Rally 2.0 to Dirt Rally was even a large graphical step forward in the same generation. This is a five year development cycle and new, much improved hardware and it looks inferior in many ways.
What bothers me even more is that I find the track layouts uninspiring, barren, boring and generic.
For instance Monte Carlo is almost a.i. generated like it is done with the trackbuilder in Dirt5. The uphill righthand corners keep repeating themselves in exactly the same way. It is like driving the same road for 17 km’s. Trackside details, elevation (like the Turkey track in Kileton’s efforts) etc. are all substantially lesser implemented than in Generations and even Codemasters’ own Dirt Rally 2.0.
What is inferior exceptfor the flat bushes tjat you only see when you crash your car? :D
Real life is uninspiring, barren, boring and generic too. Thats why we play video games.
I'm omly missing the random events, more racing lines from other drivers and of course a update for the performance .
Which game is your favorite so far?
The performance issues are annoying for me, so maybe dirt rally 2 right now. If they fix performance issues mainly stuttering, then I don't know.
Wrc is a new game with new tracks. I'll play it because rally is fun
They had it spot on in the first Dirt Rally all they had to do was work on the aero physics
2.0 wasn’t that good imo. The cars were too floaty, they were like a bar of soap in a wet sink
I have this exact feeling. Dirt 1 was a masterpiece, but something was off in Dirt 2.0. For me, even ea wrc is more enjoyable tha dirt 2.0, even being more arcade.
I can't 100% tell which is which ngl
Is the new game more arcade or simulation compared to dirt rally 2.0?
I would say it's pretty similar to Dirt Rally 2.0, but physics feel more realistic in WRC.
Looks more arcade to me. Easier at least. Much easier.
@@krocodeal6919 then how does real onboard footage look to you? You guys dont know rally
Showing order is WRC then Dirt 2.0 ? Some caption / overlay would go a long way for those not that familiar XD
Done. I can't add overlay but I did add timestamps more with game names.
Ea wrc the reason to play wrc 10 from 2 years before.
what happened to the 2001 impreza ??
Nice ❤❤❤
2:33 the sound design is so flat, there is no rawness in it.
Great comparison video. Prefer WRC to be honest. DR2 is prettier but looks very "gamey" WRC is uglier bit looks more real.
Why does DR look much better than WRC in my eyes? What's the point I miss?
Dirt rally 2.0 is a sim
This is a sim- cade but very fun to drive
WRC looks better. More realistic lighting and foliage. Everyone that thinks dirt rally looks better must like the over saturated cartoon look more.
Dirt is wilder. Like taming a stallion
Dirt2 sound👍🤘
Thanks for telling us which one is which.🙄
The video description has timestamps: WRC Means EA WRC and DR means Dirt Rally 2.0
@@ThisVersusThat Yeah, I know, but it isn't easy to access on some platforms, especially phones. Even on a PC, I'm constantly hovering my mouse over the progress bar to see the time stamps. Just include some captions, bro. Or maybe you want to stay a small channel.
Lol, skill issue!
@@ThisVersusThat It's not funny. I'm giving you constructive feedback on how you can streamline your product and improve your channel. The first rule in business is not to disparage your customers. If you plan on being a serious content creator, perhaps you could consider rising above the banter and taking responsibility for any potential flaws associated with your brand. A successful business strategy relies on monitoring and responding positively to public reception of a product.
A skill issue? Sure, I can keep tapping my phone or smart TV remote every few seconds so the TH-cam progress bar appears, allowing me to view the time stamps, but what if I want to sit back and watch the video without distractions and constant interaction with the device? People just want to watch videos and enjoy the full-screen experience without complications. I'm supposed to be a viewer, not a participant. I also don't want to see TH-cam overlays when critically analyzing graphic fidelity. I'd much prefer your polished editing skills displaying onscreen logos instead.
Many other videos compare the same thing, but are presented in more professional formats. Please provide any reasons you may have to explain why I should continue supporting your channel, given the current state of your content, and your condescending attitude towards your fan base.
Someone found chat gpt😭 Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback. I genuinely appreciate your insights and understand your concerns about the viewing experience and the quality of my content.
Firstly, I apologize if any previous interactions came across as dismissive. It was not my intention to disparage anyone. I value each and every one of my viewers and their input is crucial for the growth and improvement of this channel.
Regarding your specific points:
Viewing Experience: I understand the frustration with needing to interact frequently to see time stamps. I'm exploring ways to improve this, such as including more visible on-screen cues during key moments in the videos to help with navigation without disrupting the viewing experience.
Full-Screen Experience: Your point about the importance of an uninterrupted full-screen experience is well taken. I'll look into minimizing unnecessary overlays and finding better ways to present information cleanly and professionally.
Content Presentation: I am continuously working on refining my editing skills and the overall presentation of my videos. Your suggestion to include polished on-screen logos and a more professional format is something I will prioritize moving forward. The whole video has a format: first EA WRC, then Dirt Rally a normal person would notice that.
I have used captions in some of my older videos, as seen here:
th-cam.com/video/CXgkAnsXqGQ/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/tkqhDYkWtBU/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/ALTW_Aul4iI/w-d-xo.html
I chose not to include captions in this particular video, but I can certainly add them in the future to help everyone stay on track.
Here's how much of a constructive feedback you gave me.
Comment 1:
"Thanks for telling us which one is which.🙄"
Issues:
Sarcasm and Disrespect: The sarcastic tone and eye-rolling emoji indicate frustration but do not provide clear, actionable feedback.
Lack of Specificity: The comment doesn’t specify what the issue is or how it could be resolved.
Comment 2:
"Yeah, I know, but it isn't easy to access on some platforms, especially phones. Even on a PC, I'm constantly hovering my mouse over the progress bar to see the time stamps. Just include some captions, bro. Or maybe you want to stay a small channel.
Issues:
Disrespectful Tone: Phrases like "Just include some captions, bro" and "Or maybe you want to stay a small channel" come off as condescending and dismissive.
Negative Assumptions: The comment assumes the creator is either lazy or uninterested in growing their channel, which is unhelpful and demotivating.
Vague Solution: While the comment does mention captions, it lacks detailed suggestions on how to implement them effectively.
Why These Comments Aren’t Constructive:
Negative Tone: Both comments use sarcasm and condescension, which can be discouraging rather than helpful.
Lack of Specificity: Constructive feedback should be clear and specific about what the issue is and how it can be improved.
Absence of Encouragement: Constructive feedback should balance criticism with positive reinforcement to motivate improvement.
And yes this is funny.
Wrc looks so bad
You guys...just hated the game before it came out. Or your oc cant handle it on high settings, who know.
The EGO engine was DECADES AHEAD OF SHITTY UNREAL 5
Then why does wrc feel more like a real car?
@@pascalrofeldt7571 any engine can do that, that's up to physics Improvements int he engine, not WHICH engine moron
@@pascalrofeldt7571The new game has transplanted Ego physics.