It's fascinating the way she describes curiosity. If I hear someone say something that I do not respect, the strongest reaction I can have is to lose curiosity for them and their ideas.
Great interview. Interestingly, the recording starkly highlights Amy’s point that women are less likely to speak up even when they have something useful to say. Not one woman asked a question,
At 26:20, it's interesting that after asking a question about gender differences -- which almost always put women at a disadvantage in the workplace -- the interviewer stops listening to Dr. Edmonson's response and starts a silly, distracting nonverbal interaction with an audience member. The look of irritation on her face, though momentary, is unmistakable. Would he have dared do that with a male guest of similar status? It doesn't make him a villain. But, as she points out earlier in the video, our task is to build self awareness of our impact.
9:20 "Make it discussable." She is speaking as an authority when she is merely looking through the window and talking about what she is seeing. Take the Toyota example when the senior person expressed a level of dialogue to help free the manager to open up to discuss problems they could help him with. The senior person abandoned his hierarchy authority of power and acted in a peer to peer manner. "Make it discussable" is a command and control approach. The senior person acted heterarchically in a peer to peer fashion.
The problem is that most of what she says is correct AND implemented already. As the problem keeps growing we may wish to consider a complete different complementary view
After a 30 minutes video on the topic of psychological safety, where the guest speaker is a Harvard Business School professor, you comment about how average the interviewer is?
@@ninjananorick precisely, having being afforded the privilege of interviewing a Harvard Business School professor, you would think one would take the time to do their homework on the topic in order to ask semi-intelligent questions. Its a mark of respect.
![แฉกลโกงงานวัด 2024 [ โกงมั้ยครับ ep.106 ] | DOM](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/taC5dpP3HXA/mqdefault.jpg)
![[UNCUT] เก็บ "สจ.โต้ง" เอี่ยวมาเฟีย รู้ตัวคนบงการ ก่อนสั่งลั่นไก I คนดังนั่งเคลียร์ I 13 ธ.ค.67](/img/n.gif)
It's fascinating the way she describes curiosity. If I hear someone say something that I do not respect, the strongest reaction I can have is to lose curiosity for them and their ideas.
Great interview. Interestingly, the recording starkly highlights Amy’s point that women are less likely to speak up even when they have something useful to say. Not one woman asked a question,
At 26:20, it's interesting that after asking a question about gender differences -- which almost always put women at a disadvantage in the workplace -- the interviewer stops listening to Dr. Edmonson's response and starts a silly, distracting nonverbal interaction with an audience member. The look of irritation on her face, though momentary, is unmistakable. Would he have dared do that with a male guest of similar status? It doesn't make him a villain. But, as she points out earlier in the video, our task is to build self awareness of our impact.
I saw that too.
A main message I take from this interesting interview is: being nice is not a profession
9:20 "Make it discussable." She is speaking as an authority when she is merely looking through the window and talking about what she is seeing. Take the Toyota example when the senior person expressed a level of dialogue to help free the manager to open up to discuss problems they could help him with. The senior person abandoned his hierarchy authority of power and acted in a peer to peer manner. "Make it discussable" is a command and control approach. The senior person acted heterarchically in a peer to peer fashion.
Excellent interview
The problem is that most of what she says is correct AND implemented already. As the problem keeps growing we may wish to consider a complete different complementary view
the interviewers does not fit the context
Interviewer is pretty average
After a 30 minutes video on the topic of psychological safety, where the guest speaker is a Harvard Business School professor, you comment about how average the interviewer is?
@@ninjananorick precisely, having being afforded the privilege of interviewing a Harvard Business School professor, you would think one would take the time to do their homework on the topic in order to ask semi-intelligent questions. Its a mark of respect.
Totally Agree - his body language is quite distracting to be honest and he doesn't seem fully invested in the speaker
@@malvikaassija2702 snowflake (this comment is disappointing). I mean, what would you have the guy do... stare?
@@malvikaassija2702 So true
2020? no masks?
Early early... in 2020. It was either January or February and soon, indeed, it would have been impossible...
Teamwork can be used to build a team or harm others using junk team spirit.
th-cam.com/video/3EY0Qpr-k8U/w-d-xo.html